Category Archives: WW2

World War 2 saw the airplane rise to even greater importance than in the first World War. Air superiority became a crucial component of battlefield operations and air forces were massively expanded during the conflict.The Allied and Axis sides of the war developed enormous war machines, capable of developing and rolling out unprecedented numbers of advanced new military equipment in rapid response to changing conditions on the battlefield, as well keeping up with the technological advances of adversaries.

High altitude bombing raids and night fighting were hallmarks of the War for Europe, whilst aircraft carrier battles pitched the American and Japanese fleets against one another. The technology of the day was pushed to it’s limit with the use of superchargers in aircraft engines, the introduction of radar, and the rapid development of the jet engine by the war’s end.

The period ended as the Nuclear Age and subsequent Cold War were ushered in by the tremendous and tragic blows to Japan’s wearied people.

Fiat G.50 In Finnish Service 

Finnish flag Finland (1940-1944)
 Fighter – Number operated: 35

In late 1939, the rapid expansion of the Soviet Union in Eastern Europe caused great alarm in Finland. As a politically isolated nation with limited funds, Finland struggled to equip its military for a potential war with the Soviets. Despite the challenges they faced, they achieved some limited success in finding the equipment they needed. While the Finnish armed forces lacked for many modern weapons, they possessed a small number of advanced fighter aircraft, though not enough in the face of a Soviet invasion. To address this, they approached the Kingdom of Italy and acquired 35 Fiat G.50 Freccia fighters. While the G.50 was not an exceptional fighter in terms of overall performance, it was sufficient for the Finnish Air Forces and remained in frontline service until 1944.

The Fiat F.50 in Finnish service. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiat_G.50_Freccia

Finland’s Early Struggle to Survive 

Following the collapse of the Russian Empire, and the subsequent Civil War, Finland emerged as an independent state. While it did not have great relations with the neighboring Soviet Union, Finland’s first two decades of independent existence proved to be mostly peaceful. This changed drastically on 27th August 1939, when a secret meeting between German Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop and Soviet Foreign Minister Vyacheslav Molotov resulted in the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. This non-aggression pact had secret protocols dividing Eastern Europe into spheres of influence, which directly affected Finland. As part of the agreement,  Germany agreed to let the Soviets occupy former territories that had belonged to the Russian Empire. By September, the Soviets were in the process of occupying the Baltic states under the pretext of defending against a possible German attack. These countries were mostly too small to offer any real resistance to the Soviet demands.

Fearing a potential war with the rapidly expanding Soviet Union, Finnish military officials sought to acquire as many weapons and as much material as possible, including aircraft. As part of this, a delegation was dispatched to Italy. This delegation visited Turin in 1939, where new G.50 fighter was being tested. The Finnish representatives were impressed with the aircraft’s performance and promptly placed an order for 35 brand-new G.50s.

In November 1939, while testing the G.50’s capabilities, Finnish pilot Tapani Harmaja took a sharp dive from an altitude of over 3.5 km, reaching a remarkable speed of 830 km/h during his descent. Ironically, this was the highest speed achieved by any Italian aircraft up to that date.

Purchasing the 35 aircraft was the easy part; transporting them to Finland proved to be a much more challenging task. By then, the Second World War had already begun in Europe with the German invasion of Poland. With limited options, the aircraft were disassembled into smaller parts and transported by train to northern Germany. From there, they were loaded onto ships bound for neutral Sweden. Due to various delays, the first aircraft was not fully assembled until mid-December 1939, and the last of the 35 ordered fighters did not arrive in Finland until June 1940.

In the hope of acquiring more modern fighters Finland purchased 35 new Fiat G.50 fighters from Italy. Source:  airpages.ru

The Fiat G.50, a Brief History

During the 1930s, the Italian Ministry of Aviation (Ministero dell’aeronautica) was interested in adopting a new, all-metal monoplane fighter and ground-attack aircraft for the Italian Air Force (Regia Aeronautica). In April of 1935, engineer Giuseppe Gabrielli began working on a new low-wing, all-metal aircraft designated G.50. On 28th September 1935, Gabrielli submitted his project to the Ministry of Aviation. Military officials were impressed by the design and ordered him to proceed with his work. As Fiat’s production capacities were overburdened, work on this new project was instead moved to the Costruzioni Meccaniche Aeronautiche (CMASA) works at the Marina di Pisa, which had been a part of Fiat since 1931. By 1936, Giuseppe Gabrielli had completed his last drawings and the list of needed materials and equipment in.

The prototype was completed in early 1937 and was transported to the city of Turin for further testing. The prototype, under registration number MM 334, made its first test flight on 26 February 1937. Once accepted for service, the Fiat G.50 would become the first Italian all-metal monoplane fighter. Between 1938 to 1943, some 774 to 791 G. 50s would be built. These saw combat service starting from 1938 in the Spanish Civil War, until 1943 when the few surviving aircraft were reassigned to secondary roles.

G.50s flying in formation with a German Bf-110, possibly during the Battle of Britain Source; Wikipedia

In Finnish Service

While the G.50 proved to be a fairly modern fighter, they arrived too late and in too few numbers to have any real impact in the Winter War. The Soviet Union then demanded territorial concessions from Finland, particularly the lease of the Karelian Isthmus and other areas near Leningrad. The Finns were reluctant to comply, leading to unsuccessful negotiations. When diplomatic negotiations failed, the Soviet Union launched a military offensive against Finland on 30 November 1939. Despite being outnumbered and outgunned, the Finnish military, with their knowledge of the terrain and effective guerrilla tactics, inflicted significant casualties on the Soviet forces. The harsh winter conditions also worked to Finland’s advantage.

With the gradual arrival of the G.50, these aircraft were assigned to the  Lentolaivue 26, or shortened, LeLv 26 (REng. 26th Fighter Wing). This unit was based at Haukkajärvi. Although the G.50s arrived late, they still saw significant action. Between February and March 1940, Finnish pilots flying these aircraft managed to shoot down 11 Soviet planes, losing only one of their own.

There is some disagreement among sources and authors regarding the use of the Fiat G.50 during the Winter War. According to P. Vergnano (Fiat G.50), the aircraft was deployed in this conflict. However, other authors, such as G. Cattaneo (The Fiat G.50), state that 14 aircraft reached Finland by February 1940, and were assigned to the 26th Fighter Wing, but they did not see action until after March 1940. D. Monday (The Hamlyn Concise Guide to Axis Aircraft of World War II), simply mentions that they arrived too late to participate in the Winter War.

Despite the Finns’ valiant resistance, they were eventually forced into peace negotiations with the Soviets. The war concluded with the signing of the Treaty of Moscow on 12th March 1940. Though brief, the conflict was costly for both sides, and Finland was compelled to cede roughly 10% of its territory to the Soviet Union, including the Karelian Isthmus. Finnish military officials, however, recognized the need to prepare for future conflicts.

Camouflage And Marking

Initially, the G.50 would use camouflage of Italian origin, featuring a combination of green, brown, and sand backgrounds. In 1941, at the insistence of the Germans, the original Italian camouflage colors would remain unchanged for the Finnish planes. However, the Italian paint was prone to peeling, so ground crews used whatever was available to repair the damage. After 1942, most aircraft were repainted with Finnish camouflage colors, such as black, olive green, and light blue.

The first aircraft that arrived in Finland was designated with the code SA-1. This was later changed to FA-1 (up to FA-35) in late January 1940, with the capital ‘F’ standing for Fiat.

The standard Finnish Insignia was a Hakaristi cross, commonly referred to as a swastika, on either side of the fuselage. The Finnish Hakaristi is often conflated with the swastika used by Nazi Germany, however, the Hakaristi was not derived from the German swastika and had been used in Finland since 1918, drawing from much older cultural use. The Hakaristi markings were blue with a round shape and a white background.

Additionally, commanding fighters often had large numbers painted on their tails. The first squadron fighter leader’s aircraft had a light blue number, followed by a black number with yellow trim for the second, and a yellow number for the third. After 1942, the light blue color was replaced by a simpler white.

The first G.50 (initially marked as SA-1 later changed to FA-1) reached Finland. This aircraft used for initial testing and crew training. Source: en.topwar.ru
The standard Finnish roundel was a Hakaristi cross which as painted on the fuselage sides. Source: ww2aircraft.net
The first squadron fighter leader’s aircraft had a light blue number, followed by a black number with yellow trim for the second, and a yellow number for the third. After 1942, the light blue color was replaced by a simpler white. Source: ww2aircraft.net

Continuation War 

While not fully aligned with Nazi Germany, Finland did allow the Wehrmacht access to Northern Finland. Finland later signed the Anti-Comintern Pact, which was initially an anti-communist pact between Germany and Japan, with other minor nations signing throughout the war. Prior to this, relations had already been previously established, which was convenient for both nations, as Germany could stage their military in Lapland, and other areas of Finland, for Operation Barbarossa. In turn, Finland would be granted the military assistance they needed. However, this ended all support, both material and political, from the Western Allies. On the 22nd of June 1941, Germany’s invasion of the Soviet Union began, assisted by some Finnish forces. Three days later, the Soviets staged air raids against nearby Finnish cities, thus beginning the Continuation War. Finland never sought to gain any additional territory from the conflict, only to regain control of what was initially lost during the Winter War.

Just before the outbreak of the Continuation War, the Finns observed that the newly arrived G.50 aircraft were somewhat ill-suited for operating in the harsh Northern climate. This was not entirely unexpected, as the aircraft had been designed in Italy, a much warmer region, and the designers had not anticipated the need for the G.50 to function in colder parts of the world. In response, the Finnish Army attempted to modify the G.50 to enhance its effectiveness in these conditions.

The G.50s that the Finns received were from the first production series, which featured enclosed cockpits. This design element was not well received by Finnish pilots, leading to the replacement of the enclosed cockpits with open ones. Additionally, the aircraft’s variable-pitch propeller mechanism had a tendency to freeze in low temperatures, risking critical component failure. To address this issue, the Finns turned to Sweden for assistance, importing Swedish propeller spinners that were better suited for cold climates. These spinners were originally used on Swedish-imported CR.42 and J11 biplanes, which had faced similar issues.

Further modifications included replacing the original G.50 fins and rudders with improved versions. Finnish engineers also experimented with the installation of landing skis for use in snowy conditions.

To avoid freezing of some parts of the propellers, Finish engineers added a new Swedish propeller spinner, as seen here. Source: P. Verganano Fiat G.50

When the war resumed, the 26th Fighter Wing, stationed at an airfield near Utti, was tasked with defending the area around Lake Ladoga, where they saw the bulk of their action. From the outset, Finnish pilots operating the G.50 achieved remarkable success. On the first day of the conflict, the six G.50s managed to shoot down ten Soviet bombers without suffering any losses. One pilot, Oiva Tuominen, alone shot down four of these bombers within a matter of minutes. Tuominen would go on to become one of Finland’s top fighter aces, credited with a total of 23 air victories (though some sources claim 33 or even 43), with around 15 of these achieved while flying the G.50. For his service, he was awarded the Mannerheim Cross, Finland’s highest military decoration at the time. In 1941, following the German invasion, the number of Soviet aircraft on this front sharply declined.

In late August 1941, they successfully shot down nine Soviet fighters. By the end of the war, pilots of the 26th Fighter Wing had achieved approximately 88 air victories, with the loss of 11 G.50 aircraft. Of these, only two were downed by Soviet fighters, one was lost to anti-aircraft fire, and eight were lost due to accidents or mechanical failures.

By 1943, the introduction of newer Soviet fighter models and better-trained pilots forced the Finnish Air Force primarily into a defensive role. At this point, the G.50 was clearly obsolete as a frontline fighter, but due to a lack of alternatives, it remained in service until 1944. After May 1944, the surviving aircraft were withdrawn and relegated to secondary roles, such as training. However, by the end of the war, several operational G.50 fighters remained in use, with some continuing to serve until 1947.

Technical characteristics

The G.50 was a single-seat, low-wing, all-metal fighter plane. The fuselage was made from four angular longerons. The wing construction consisted of a center section which was made of a steel tube connected to the lower fuselage and two metal spars connected with ribs. The fuselage, wing, and tail were covered with duralumin sheets. The only fabric-covered parts of the aircraft were the movable control surfaces in the wings and the tail. The G.50 was powered by the 840 hp (626 kW) Fiat A 74 RC 38, a 14-cylinder radial piston engine, which drove an all-metal three-blade propeller produced by Fiat.

The G.50 was equipped, like most modern aircraft of the time, with inward retracting landing gear, but the rear tail wheel was fixed. In later improved versions, the rear tail wheel was changed to a retractable type as well.

The armament consisted of two forward-firing 12.7mm Breda-SAFAT heavy machine guns, with 150 rounds of ammunition for each gun. The guns were placed behind the upper engine cowl and were synchronized in order not to damage the propeller.

In Finnish service, these aircraft received several modifications as mentioned earlier. This included an open pilot cockpit, enlarged tail control surfaces, and propeller spinners which protected the variable pitch mechanism from the cold climate.

The Finnish version could be easily identified by the open cockpit and the use of an engine spinner, Source: www.militaryimages.net

Conclusion

The acquisition of the Fiat G.50 provided Finnish pilots with a more modern fighter aircraft. While the design was not exceptional from the start, the Finns managed to put it to good use, achieving relatively good success against the Soviet Air Force. The G.50 remained in service well into the later stages of the war.

Specification G.50 Fighter
Wingspan 35 ft 11 in / 10.9 m
Length 26 ft  3 in / 8 m
Height 10 ft 7 in / 3.28 m
Wing Area 196.5 ft² / 18.25 m²
Engine One 840 hp (626 kW) Fiat A.74 RC.38, 14 cylinder radial piston
Empty Weight 4,353 lbs / 1,975 kg
Maximum Takeoff Weight 5,324 lbs / 2,415 kg
Fuel Capacity 316 l
Maximum Speed 292 mph / 470 km/h
Range 267 mi / 445 km
Maximum Service Ceiling 35,100 ft (10,700 m)
Climb speed Climb to 19,700 ft (6,000 m) in 7 minutes and 30 seconds
Crew One pilot
Armament
  • Two 12.7 mm Breda-SAFAT heavy machine guns

Illustration

Credits

  • Article written by Marko P.
  • Edited by  Henry H.
  • Illustration by Haryo Panji

Sources 

  • V. Nenye (2016) Finland At War  The Continuation And Lapland Wars 1941-45, Osprey Publishing
  • V. Nenye (2015) Finland At War The Winter War, Osprey Publishing
  • P. Jowett and B. Snodgrass (2006) Finland At War 1939-45, Osprey Publishing
  • D. Nesic (2008)  Naoružanje Drugog Svetsko Rata-Italija. Beograd
  • C. Shores (1979) Regia Aeronautica Vol. I, Signal publication.
  • D. Monday (2006) The Hamlyn Concise Guide To Axis Aircraft OF World War II, Bounty Books.
  • V. Nenye (2016) Finland At War The Continuation And Lapland Wars 1941-45, Osprey Publishing
  • V. Nenye (2015) Finland At War The Winter War, Osprey Publishing
  • P. Jowett and B. Snodgrass (2006) Finland At War 1939-45, Osprey Publishing
  • P. Verganano (1997)  Fiat G.50, La Bancarella Aeronautica
  • A, Brioschi (2000) I Colori Del Fiat G.50, La Bancarella Aeronautica
  • G. Cattaneo The Fiat G.50, Profile Publication

 

Me 261

Nazi flag Nazi Germany (1938)

Type: High endurance experimental, reconnaissance aircraft

Number built: Three prototypes

Before the outbreak of the Second World War, the Luftwaffe (Eng. German Air Force) was undergoing a massive expansion. Numerous new aircraft designs were either being introduced into service or undergoing testing, with many being integrated into the military for various roles. A number of newly developed aircraft were also primarily used for evaluation and experimentation, and, there were also several designs created specifically to set records. One such aircraft, the Me 261, was built specifically at the request of Adolf Hitler to set long-range records. Due to its specialized role, and the fact that it was not initially ordered by the Luftwaffe, only three prototypes of the Me 261 were built.

The rather obscure Me 261 long-range transport and recconaissance aircraft. Source: alternathistory.ru

History

With the rise of Nazis in Germany, substantial financial resources were allocated to military projects. The Luftwaffe was founded, and saw massive expansion and the introduction of new aircraft designs. However, not all these designs were intended for pure military service. Some projects were mainly aimed at experimentation, and among these were aircraft designed solely to showcase technological advancements and break world records. This trend was quite common in the years leading up to the outbreak of the Second World War in Europe. For example, the Messerschmitt Me 209 was created to set a world speed record, with little to no concerns made over a possible military application.

Speed was not the only record to be pursued, there were others, such as long-range flight. This particular challenge fascinated Hitler, who in 1937, initiated the development of a long-range monoplane. Aside from the many things that might be learned from the experiment, Hitler envisioned this aircraft undertaking the long-range flight from Berlin to Tokyo for the 1940 Olympic Games, carrying the Olympic Torch from Germany over Asia. To meet this requirement, the initial requirements specified that the aircraft needed to have an operational range of over 13,000 km.

The Reichsluftfahrtministerium (RLM), or German Air Ministry, selected the Messerschmitt company for this task. Despite being a relatively small enterprise at the time, Messerschmitt had achieved great success with the Bf 109, one of the best fighters of its era. The official contract was signed on the 18th March, 1938. Under the designation P.1064, Messerschmitt presented a proposal to Hitler for a new aircraft. This aircraft was to be operated by a crew of five within a rather cramped, and elongated fuselage. Due to the aircraft’s specific role, the fuel load was prioritized over crew comfort. Hitler approved the proposal and ordered the construction of three prototypes. The project was subsequently renamed Me 261. Due to Hitler’s keen interest, the aircraft was nicknamed Adolfine by its crew.

In 1939, work began on the three Me 261 prototypes. Despite Hitler’s ambitions, the Me 261 was given low priority, and construction proceeded slowly, and anticipating a war with Poland, work on these aircraft was halted. However, recognizing its potential for long-range reconnaissance and the valuable information it could provide, work resumed in 1940.

The first prototype, Me 261 V1 (BJ-CP or BC-CP, depending on the sources), was flight-tested by Karl Baur in December 1940. The following year, the second prototype, Me 261 V2 (BJ-CQ), was tested. The V2 featured a glazed observation dome on the dorsal fuselage, replacing the rear dome used on the V1. The construction of the third prototype, Me 261 V3 (BJ-CR), faced delays and only completed its test flight in 1943. This version was distinct from the earlier prototypes, featuring a larger crew capacity of seven and being powered by two 2,950 hp DB 610 engines. On the 16th April, 1943, Karl Baur conducted a ten-hour test flight with the V3.

 

The last of the Me 261 was the V3 prototype, which was powered by stronger engines. Source: airpages.ru

Technical characteristics

Unfortunately, since the Me 161 did not progress beyond the prototype stage. It was designed as an all-metal, long-range transport and later as a reconnaissance aircraft. The fuselage was slim but cramped, made of metal, and covered in duralumin.

The wings of the Me 261 were constructed using a metal frame with a single spar. They were then covered with flush-riveted, stressed-skin metal panels. Notably, the section of the wing closest to the fuselage had a thick profile, which tapered to the wingtips. This design was intentional, as it allowed for a large fuel storage area. The aircraft also featured a twin-rudder tail at the rear.

For its long-range flight operations, the Me 261 had a crew of five: a pilot, co-pilot, radio operator, navigator, and flight engineer. The pilot and copilot sat side-by-side in the cockpit with the radio operator in a central compartment, and the flight engineer and navigator seated in the rearmost compartment, where the aircraft’s bunks were also located.

The first two prototypes were powered by twin 2,700 hp DB 606A/B twenty-four-cylinder engines. These engines were essentially two twelve-cylinder DB 601 engines coupled together to drive a single shaft, requiring two separate radiators and oil coolers. Each DB 606A/B engine was housed within a large nacelle and used four-blade propellers with a diameter of 4.6 meters.

The Me 261 DB 606A/B twenty-four-cylinder engine consisted of two coupled twelve-cylinder DB 601 engines. They worked well on the He 261 and no major issue was reported with it. Source: oldmachinepress.com

Despite frequent mentions of the aircraft being overburdened, sources do not specify a consistent maximum takeoff weight. Additionally, the total fuel capacity is also unspecified. Depending on the sources, the operational range varies from 11,000 to 13,200 km.

To accommodate the aircraft’s weight, it required large-diameter landing wheels that could retract up to 90 degrees into the wings. In addition to these, it had a fully retractable tail wheel retracted towards the front of the aircraft.

The Me 261 was designed as an all-metal, long-range transport and later as a reconnaissance aircraft source: Wikipedia
The first two prototypes were powered by twin 2,700 hp DB 606A/B twenty-four-cylinder engines. To cope with their weight, it was provided with two large-diameter landing wheels. Source: planehistoria.com
Side view of the second prototype. Source:  alternathistory.ru

Fate

Despite demonstrating some potential for long-range reconnaissance, the Me 261 was ultimately rejected from service due to the additional equipment requirements that would have further strained its already overburdened airframe, thereby compromising its flight performance. Despite its cancellation, the V3 prototype (and possibly the other two prototypes) saw operational use as reconnaissance aircraft during the war. In July or April of 1943, the V3 suffered an accident during landing that heavily damaged its landing gear. Although repaired and returned to service, the V3 was eventually scrapped by order of the RLM.

The V1 aircraft was lost during an Allied bombing raid on the Rechlin test center in September 1944, while the V2 was captured by the Allies at the same location in April 1945. Neither prototype survived the war; the captured V2 was scrapped a few weeks after its capture.

The V3 aircraft was damaged during a landing accident but was repaired and put back into service. Source: www.destinationsjourney.com
The V2 was captured by the Allies and was eventually scraped. Source: planehistoria.com

Conclusion 

The Me 261 was an aircraft that was not ordered by the Luftwaffe as a military aircraft and thus received low priority. Despite its initial potential for use as a reconnaissance aircraft, it quickly became evident that it would not be feasible for adoption in this role due to its considerable weight. Ultimately, only three were built, and none of them survived the war.

Me 261 V3 Specifications

Wingspans 26.9 m / 88 ft 1 in
Length 16.7 m / 54  ft 9 in
Height 4.72 m /  15 ft  5 in
Wing Area 76 m² /  817.8 ft²
Engine Two 2,950 hp DB 610 engines
Endurance 24 hours and 36 minutes
Maximum Speed 620 km/h / 385mph
Cruising speed 400 km/h / 248 mph
Range 11,000 km / 6,831 miles
Maximum Service Ceiling 8,250 m  / 27,060 ft
Crew 1 pilot
Armament
  • None

Illustration

Credits

  • Article written by Marko P.
  • Edited by  Henry H.
  • Illustration by Oussama Mohamed “Godzilla”

Source:

  • D. Herwig and H. Rode (2000) Luftwaffe Secret Projects Strategic Bombers 1935 to 1945, Midland Publishing
  • D. Nesić  (2008)  Naoružanje Drugog Svetsko Rata-Nemačka. Beograd
  • D. Monday (2006) The Hamlyn Concise Guide To Axis Aircraft OF World War II, Bounty Books.
  • J. R. Smith and A. L. Kay (1972) German Aircraft of the WW2, Putnam

 

ANT-2

USSR flag USSR (1923)
All-metal passenger aircraft – five Built

Following his successful first attempt to develop an aircraft, Andrei Nikolayevich Tupolev felt confident in his ability to attempt the design an all-metal aircraft. Although some European nations had already tested or built such aircraft during the First World War, this concept was still novel in the burgeoning Soviet Union of the early 1920s. With the advent of duralumin production in the Soviet Union, and the experimentation with various construction methods, Tupolev began work on the aircraft known as the ANT-2 in 1922. After a period of testing and evaluation, five aircraft of this type were constructed.

Tupolev ANT-2 was the Soviet first operational all-metal aircraft. Source: P. Duffy and A. Kandalov Tupolev The Man and His Aircraft

History

The success of the ANT-1 (standing for the initials of Andrei Nikolayevich Tupovlev) test aircraft prompted Tupolev to advocate for the development of fully metal-constructed aircraft. The harsh weather conditions in many parts of the Soviet Union caused wooden materials to decay quickly. Metal alloys, on the other hand, offered numerous advantages over wood: they were stronger, more durable, and allowed for overall more resilient aircraft designs. Tupolev saw the use of wood in modern aviation as an obsolete construction material.

His view was shared by others in the burgeoning Soviet aviation industry. In 1922, a commission at the Central Aero/Hydrodynamics Institute (TsAGI) was formed under the leadership of Andrei Nikolaevich. Its purpose was to spearhead the development of factories and facilities capable of producing duralumin. One such production center was already operating in Kolchuginsk, near Moscow, where the production of duralumin, nicknamed “Kolchugaluminium”, began in September 1922. This development enabled Tupolev to start working on an all-metal aircraft.

Tupolev established his design bureau with 15 supporting members. However, the initial phase was challenging, as the new technology required skilled workers who needed training in this new field. Additionally, many components used in all-metal aircraft construction had to undergo extensive testing. Tupolev, being a cautious man, did not want to risk any pilot’s life before he was certain that the new all-metal aircraft would perform as intended. Consequently, he spent considerable time refining various designs, mostly using speedboats and gliders. In 1921, Tupolev spent some time testing his ideas and designs using speedboats from his base of operations in Crimea. The experience he gained there greatly helped him in his further work.

Work On the ANT-2

As soon as Tupolev was sure that all crucial components were sufficiently tested, the work on the new all-metal aircraft, designated ANT-2, began in 1923. The design was largely driven by the requirements of the Soviet UVVS-RKKA (Directorate of the Air Fleet of the Workers and Peasants). This was the first official request for a new military aircraft, one capable of transporting two passengers, armed with two machine guns, and would most importantly, be inexpensive to build. Tupolev and his team established a small workshop in Kolchuginsk.

Initially, there were problems as the Kolchuginsk factory was only known for producing duralumin, not for shaping it into the various forms needed for aircraft construction. Time was needed to train the workers to effectively shape duralumin into the necessary parts.

During this period, while working on various proposed designs, Tupolev had the opportunity to inspect a Junkers K16 transport aircraft. The German company Junkers, wanting to avoid the sanctions on arms and aviation development imposed by the Allies, sought cooperation with the Soviets. They even managed to set up a small production plant in the Soviet Union.  The Soviets, in turn, were eager to acquire new technologies. The Junkers K16 featured a high wing and an open cockpit, design characteristics that Tupolev incorporated into his ANT-2 project.

The Junkers K16 served as inspiration for the ANT-2 Source: Wiki
The ANT-2, when compared to the K16, exhibits many similarities in overall shape. While Tupolev drew inspiration from the K16, he did not merely replicate it. Instead, he used it as a foundation to experiment with many of his own design elements, particularly in its wings. Source: en.topwar.ru

The prototype was completed in 1924 and underwent its first flight test in late May of that year, piloted by Nikolai Petrov. To simulate the weight of two passengers, two sandbags were used, as Tupolev did not want to risk any lives at the prototype stage. Further flight tests were conducted on May 28 by a Soviet military delegation. Starting from June 11, the ANT-2 was tested with two, and occasionally three, passengers inside its fuselage. Overall, the performance was deemed sufficient, though a significant modification was required for the rear tail assembly. The rudder and stabilizer size had to be increased, subsequently improving the aircraft’s performance. To conduct further tests, four more aircraft were built. By 1930, at least one of these aircraft was equipped with a more powerful 200 hp Wright Whirlwind engine.

Fate

A total of five ANT-2 aircraft were produced. While these were used for various tests, their specific operational roles are not well documented. The anticipated military variant, which was to feature a new cockpit positioned behind the wings and be armed with one or two machine guns, was never built. The first aircraft has been preserved and can be seen at the Aviation Museum in Monino, near Moscow. The fate of the remaining aircraft is unclear, but they were likely scrapped at some point.

The only surviving ANT-2 can be seen at the Aviation Museum Monino near Moscow. Source: Wiki
In recognition of its significant role in Soviet aviation history, the ANT-2 was featured on a Soviet postage stamp. Source: stock.adobe.com

Specification

The ANT-2 was designed as a high-wing, all-metal monoplane. Tupolev chose a triangular shape for the fuselage, with the sides sloping inward from top to bottom. This triangular design provided excellent structural integrity, reducing the need for additional fuselage struts. The fuselage was divided into three sections: the front section housed the engine, the open cockpit, followed by a small passenger compartment. The compartment could accommodate two passengers seated opposite each other. Although the aircraft was intended for three occupants, this was generally avoided due to weight limitations. Passengers entered the aircraft through a door on the left side of the fuselage.

The wing was located just behind the cockpit. It was constructed with two spars connected by 13 ribs on each side and covered with duralumin. Tupolev designed the wing with a curved, concave underside. The entire wing assembly was then attached to the top of the fuselage using four bolts. To accommodate the cockpit, part of the central section of the wing was cut off. Additionally, two handles were added to the ends of the wings on both sides, allowing the ground crew to maneuver the aircraft on the ground. The rear tail assembly consisted of a metal frame covered with duralumin.

The landing gear featured two fixed road wheels mounted on vertical struts, equipped with shock absorbers to ensure smoother landings. At least one aircraft was instead fitted with skis. A pivoting tail skid was used at the rear.

It was powered by a Bristol Lucifer three-cylinder engine producing 100 horsepower. With it a maximum speed of 170 km/h could be achieved. This engine, however, had some difficulties due to its significant torque, which could occasionally damage the engine mounts. Topolev, aware of this issue, designed a strong mount to counteract this problem. To allow access for repairs, the engine cover was secured with a few bolts. The engine drove a wooden two-blade propeller with a diameter of 2.2 meters. Fuel was stored in two 36 kg tanks located in the wings.

The cockpit was open, and to enter, the pilot used a small footrest on the left side of the fuselage. The cockpit was equipped with the basic and necessary controls and indicators, such as fuel level, RPM counter, and oil pressure gauge.

The ANT-2 was powered by a Bristol Lucifer three-cylinder engine producing 100 hp with a wooden two-blade propeller with a diameter of 2.2 meters. Source: Wiki
At least one aircraft was fitted with skis. Source: en.topwar.ru
The wings were constructed using two spars connected by 13 ribs on each side and covered with duralumin. Source:  en.topwar.ru
A good view of the real tail assembly. Source: www.valka.cz
The small passenger compartment was located inside the fuselage. Source: Wiki
Top view of the pilot’s open cockpit. Source:  en.topwar.ru

Conclusion

While the ANT-2 did not enter mass production, this was less important as it showed that the concept of using metal for the construction of a fully functional aircraft was feasible. It was the first stepping stone of the new, and slowly rising, Soviet aviation industry. It was the first such aircraft to be successfully tested by the Soviets, and paved the way for further Tupolev’s research and work, which enabled him to develop, in time,  more advanced designs. In addition, it was the first aircraft that was officially ordered by the Soviets for limited production.

ANT-2 Specifications

Wingspans 10.45 m / 34 ft 3 in
Length 7.6 m / 24 ft 11 in
Height 2.12 m / 6 ft 11 in
Wing Area 17.9 m²  / 193 ft²
Engine One
Empty Weight 523 kg / 1,153 lb
Maximum Takeoff Weight 837 kg / 1,846 lb
Maximum Speed 170 km/h / 106 mph
Range 750 km/ 466 miles
Maximum Service Ceiling 3,300 m / 10,926 ft
Crew 1 pilot
Armament
  • None

Illustration

 

Credits

  • Article written by Marko P.
  • Edited by  Henry H.
  • Illustrations by Oussama Mohamed “Godzilla”

Sources:

  • Duško N. (2008)  Naoružanje Drugog Svetsko Rata-SSSR. Beograd.
  • Y. Gordon and V. Rigmant (2005) OKB Tupolev, Midland
  • P. Duffy and A. Kandalov (1996) Tupolev The Man and His Aircraft, SAE International
  • B. Gunston () Tupolev Aircraft Since 1922, Naval Institute press

 

Dewoitine D.520 in Regia Aeronautica Service 

italian flag Kingdom of Italy/Italian Social Republic  (1941-1945)
Fighter – Approximately 60 Airframes Received

The Dewoitine D.520 was an advanced French fighter aircraft of the Second World War, which had been employed in large numbers during the Battle of France. After the French Campaign, the German forces captured dozens of Dewoitine D.520s in working order, of which 60 were delivered to the Italian Regia Aeronautica (Royal Air Force) in two separate batches of 30 planes.

Leftovers

Of those, some were never retrieved from the French airports they were left at, and others were disassembled, and cannibalized for spare parts. For these reasons, and the absence of data in Italian official documents, many of their stories have been lost to time.

Prior to being supplied any D.520 by the Luftwaffe, the Italian Regio Esercito (Royal Army) had captured about 30 Dewoitine D.520s during its involvement in the Battle of France. These were almost immediately delivered to the Regia Aeronautica. According to the official documentation, the first three specimens were assigned to 2° Stormo Caccia (Eng: 2nd Fighter Wing), even if it is not clear when they were delivered and to which squadron.

Regia Aeronautica D.520 of an unidentified squadron. The planes have by this point received Italian markings, such as the cross and the white band, but the base camouflage appears to remain the one featured on the original French planes, with the exception of the red propeller hub. Source: Pinterest

The command of the 2° Stormo was based at the Turin-Mirafiori airport after the 20th of January 1941, with 68 pilots and 119 mechanics, a total of 12 FIAT C.R. 42, and waiting for the new Macchi M.C. 202. For two months, they defended the largest industrial centers in northern Italy, such as Turin, Milan, Genoa, and Savona. At the end of February, the first Macchi M.C. 200 and some CR 42s arrived, bringing the department’s equipment to 62 MC 200s and 22 CR 42s, but with no mention of the Dewoitines.

There appear to have been three D.520s available. Due to a lack of spare parts and 20 mm ammunition (the Hispano-Suiza did not fire the same 20 mm cartridges produced in Italy), these were rarely used by pilots, except for training to fight against the French aircraft.

A Regia Aeronautica D.520. This picture is referred to as having been taken either in France, before the aircraft was transferred to Italy, or on an airfield in Southern Italy. Source: Pinterest

The remaining Dewoitines captured by Italy were kept at the airports of Montélimar, Orange, Istres, and Aix-en-Provence, and at the Toulouse factory until the beginning of 1943, when some Italian pilots, including Pilot Sergeant Luigi Gorrini (19 kills and 9 probable) had the task of transferring them to Italy.

Of these new D.520s taken over by the Regia Aeronautica, 8 went to equip the 22° Gruppo Autonomo Caccia Terrestre (22nd Autonomous Terrestrial Fighter Group) in late February 1943 at the airport of Capodichino. The French aircraft were deployed alongside the Macchi M.C. 202, the Reggiane Re. 2001, and some pre-series Reggiane Re. 2005. These aircraft were used to intercept the American B-24 bombers which increasingly hit the city of Naples.

The Dewoitine proved to be very efficient in this task, managing to damage several bombers, often causing the bombers to abort their missions. They were helped by their powerful 20 mm cannon, which at the time had no equivalent on the Italian fighters of the unit (except for the Re. 2005). This is not particularly surprising, as the cannon firing through the propeller hub, a feature of the D.520, and in general most French fighters of the era, was found to be highly accurate in most situations, though limited by a magazine of only 60 rounds. The Italian planes, such as the Macchis and the FIATs, were less precise, but had increased magazines that guaranteed the possibility to commit to several attacks.

On March 1st, 1943, Major Vittorio Minguzzi, commander of the 22° Gruppo Autonomo Caccia Terrestre, and a Reggiane Re. 2005 veteran, shot down a B-24 in the middle of a  bombing run over Naples with a D.520. This kill, considered probable for a long time until the discovery of the bomber’s wreck, was the first recorded victory by a D.520 of the Regia Aeronautica, even if it is likely some Allied aircraft had already fallen victim to Italian D.520s in the previous weeks.

Details of the nose of a D.520 during the plane’s showcase to General Mazzucco, 19th of May 1943. Source: Pinterest

On 19th May 1943 in Littoria, the 371ª Squadriglia Caccia Terrestri (371th Terrestrial Fighter Squadron) officially presented the French fighter to General Renato Mazzucco, commander of the 3ª Divisione Aerea (3rd Air Division), who had come to visit their airbase. This confirms that the 371ª Squadriglia Caccia Terrestri also had a certain number of Dewoitines in service.

On 21st May 1943, the Regia Aeronautica delivered 39 Lioré et Olivier LeO 451 bombers previously captured in the SNCASE factory in Lyon’s Ambérieu-en-Bugey to the Luftwaffe in exchange for the delivery of 30 French Dewoitine D.520s captured by the Germans and apparently never used after the French surrender.

Apparently, these aircraft were delivered without ammunition, without any spare parts, and with evident damage to the weapons and equipment on board. It is supposed this damage was sabotage performed by French pilots, before their aircraft fell into Axis hands during the Battle of France.

After Italian mechanics disassembled some of them to cannibalize the spare parts, these Dewoitines were supplied to the 161° Gruppo Autonomo Caccia Terrestre (161st Autonomous Terrestrial Fighter Group) based at several airports in southern Italy. The numbers are not known, but they were used by the 163a Squadriglia Caccia Terrestri (163rd Terrestrial Fighter Squadron) in Grottaglie, 162a Squadriglia Caccia Terrestri (162nd Terrestrial Fighter Squadron)  in Crotone, and 164a Squadriglia Caccia Terrestri (164th Terrestrial Fighter Squadron)  in Reggio Calabria together with a force of Italian fighters.

Other units that used the D.520 were the 355a Squadriglia (355th Squadron)  and the 370a Squadriglia (370th Squadron), with both units receiving three each, under the 24° Gruppo Autonomo Caccia Terrestre (24th Autonomous Terrestrial Fighter Group).

The 232a Squadriglia Caccia (232nd Fighter Squadron) of the 59° Gruppo Bombardamento Terrestre (59th Terrestrial Bombardment Group) received an unknown number of D.520s for escort duties alongside Savoia Marchetti S.M. 79 three-engine bombers. An unspecified number were used by the 167º Gruppo Autonomo Intercettori (167th Autonomous Interceptor Group) based in Guidonia with the specific task of defending the city from bombers. It is also known that  D.520s were used by the 60° Gruppo Bombardamento Terrestre (60th Terrestrial Bombardment Group), and the 13° Gruppo Caccia (13th Fighter Group), the latter being stationed at the Arena Metano Airport near Pisa.

According to official records, on July 31st, 1943, the Regia Aeronautica still had 47 Dewoitine D.520s in service, which were used mostly in the role of bomber interceptors.

In the confusion that followed after the armistice of 8th September 1943, the departments of the Royal Italian Army parted ways. Some, continuing to fight for the Axis, became part of the Aeronautica Nazionale Repubblicana or ANR (Republican National Air Force). The Aeronautica Cobelligerante Italiana (Italian Co-belligerent Air Force) fought for the Allies, but did not use the D.520.

Many Dewoitines were destroyed by pilots and mechanics, or were captured by the Germans, who re-used them in the Luftwaffe.

The ANR took possession of three D.520s previously in service with the 24° Gruppo Autonomo Caccia Terrestre. These three aircraft were assigned to the recently established 101º Gruppo autonomo caccia (101st Autonomous Fighter Group) in Turin-Mirafiori for training tasks with Macchi M.C. 200 and FIAT C.R. 42 and, disbanded some time later, without ever taking part in combat.

Italian Evaluation 

The Italian judgment of the Dewoitine D.520 was not entirely positive for two reasons. The first is to be found in a nationalist perspective, which gave a negative perception for the foreign D.520. Secondly, pilots such as the ace Luigi Gorrini, who had the opportunity to test it in simulated combat against other fighters, did not consider it agile enough compared to contemporary aircraft, such as the Macchi M.C. 200. Italian pilots considered the D.520 inferior to the Macchi in all areas except armament.

However, the spacious cockpit, the very efficient communication system (when not tampered with), and the 20 mm cannon were praised. These would only be introduced on Italian aircraft starting from 1943. Against US bombers, the guns made a marked difference even if the little ammunition on board was often a limiting factor. The same had been found by French pilots during the campaign of France, who often had to rely on the machine-guns if the mission went on for too long; this was more of an issue against the more robust bombers which were being fielded by 1943.

Italian camouflage and markings 

The typical camouflage used on the Italian planes was similar to the original French one. The coat of arms of the French Air Force was covered with new layers of paint, adding a band on both sides of the wings and one on the fuselage with white paint. The Croce di Savoia was painted on the rudder, a distinctive symbol of Italian aircraft since June 1940. An interesting note is that the Croce di Savoia on the Dewoitines was painted without the coat of arms of the Italian royal family.

A Dewoitine D. 520 of the 24° Gruppo Autonomo Caccia Terrestre with its distinctive coat of arms. Olbia, Sardinia 1943. Source: Pinterest

At least one specimen was painted in an aluminum color (since the photo is in black and white, for a long time, it was believed to be in Olive Green). It had the typical coat of arms of Italian fighters, the Fasci Littori, on the sides of the cockpit and the ‘Fasci Littori Alari’ symbol of the Regia Aeronautica on the wings. This unique example was painted on the occasion of General Mazzucco’s visit to Guidonia.

The 59° Gruppo Bombardamento Terrestre aircraft received the standard camouflage used in North Africa by the Royal Italian Air Force, khaki with dark green spots. These D. 520s were painted with the Savoia royal family coat of arms.

The ANR specimens were painted in light gray with dark gray spots, a tricolor on the fuselage and rudder and the ‘Fasci Littori Alari’ on the wings. According to evidence, at least one specimen remained in the classic French camouflage, perhaps being repainted into the ANR camouflage at a later time.

Conclusions 

Despite the little information on the operational history of the Dewoitine D.520s in Italian service, we can suppose that it was appreciated by the Italian pilots, even for their rancor against all aircraft of foreign origin. The limited numbers received and deployed by the Italian units did not permit a great service of these French aircraft by the Regia Aeronautica. For much of their service, these planes were held at airports for maintenance.

Dewoitine D.520C-1 specifications

Wingspan 10.18 m
Length 8.75 m
Height 2.55 m
Wing Area 16 m²
Engine Hispano-Suiza 12Y-45
Power at Critical Altitude 935 hp at 4,200 m
Max RPM 2,400 RRM
Propeller Three-bladed Ratier or Chauvière (3 m diameter)
Empty Weight 2,050 kg
Maximum Takeoff Weight 2,740 kg
Wing Load 195 kg/m²
Fuel Capacity 400 liters standard

640 liters with wing fuel tanks

Time to Altitude 4,000 m in 5’13”

6,000 m in 7’57”

8,000 m in 13’24”

Maximum Speed 425 km/h at sea level

535 km/h at 6,750 m

Cruising Speed 400 km/h
Stall Speed 125 km/h
Range Around 900 km with a standard fuel load

1,500 km at max fuel load (equipped w/ wing tanks)

Maximum Service Ceiling 11,000 m /
Crew 1 Pilot
Armament 20 mm HS-404 firing through the propeller hub with 60 rounds

4x MAC34M39 machine guns with 675 rounds per gun in the wings

Number Completed 60 officially delivered to Regia Aeronautica unknown used in active service

Illustrations

Credits

  • Written by Arturo Giusti
  • Edited by Henry H.
  • Illustrations by Oussama Mohamed “Godzilla”

Sources

 

Me 309Zw (Me 609)

Nazi Germany (1944)

Proposed Fighter Design

During the war, Messerschmitt endeavored to find potential successors to their existing aircraft models. This quest yielded several aircraft proposals, one of which was the Me 309, which they sought to replace their older Me 109 fighter with. Despite Messerschmitt’s hopes for its success, the Me 309 proved to be unreliable and mechanically flawed, leading to its rejection for adoption. Undeterred by this setback, Messerschmitt persisted with the project, eventually turning their attention to a new twin-fuselage fighter, often referred to in various sources as the Me 609.

Artistic 3d model of the “Me 609” . Source: www.3dcadbrowser.com

A Brief History of Germany Twin-Fighter Program History

In the early stages of the war, the Messerschmitt Me 109 emerged as an exceptional fighter, arguably one of the world’s best at the time. However, despite its prowess, there remained ample room for improvement in its design. By the early 1940s, engineers at Messerschmitt began exploring avenues to enhance its overall flight performance. Among the considerations was the idea that while one engine delivered outstanding results, pairing two engines might yield even greater capabilities, bringing an increase in operational range and top speed. This notion laid the groundwork for a bold project: combining two Me 109s into a single aircraft, designated as the Me 109Z, with the ‘Z’ representing the German word “Zwilling”, meaning twin. The concept aimed to harness the power of dual fuselages and engines to significantly enhance both performance and firepower, envisioning the aircraft as either a formidable destroyer or a fighter bomber.

In theory, the design was relatively straightforward: merging two fuselages along with a central wing. The cockpit would be positioned within one of the fuselages, along with modifications to the landing gear. Despite the unconventional approach, a functional prototype utilizing two Me 109Fs was successfully constructed in 1942. However, the evaluation and test flight process extended until 1943, during which the prototype was either lost or severely damaged in one of the numerous Allied bombing raids.

Amidst the pressing demands of concurrent projects, such as the development of the Me 262, the Me 109Z initiative was ultimately abandoned, reflecting the shifting priorities and challenges faced by German engineers during the Second World War .

An Me 109Z drawing. Source: www.luft46.com

A Second Option 

Another Messerschmitt project aimed at enhancing the performance of the Me 109 was the Me 309. This new endeavor sought substantial improvements, integrating several new features such as enhanced armament, a pressurized cockpit, a tricycle undercarriage, and retractable radiators. Initiated by Messerschmitt in 1940, the project faced reluctance from the German Aviation Ministry (RLM), leading to significant delays. It wasn’t until the end of 1941 that actual work on the project began. Despite these challenges, the first Me 309 V-1 prototype was completed in June 1942, followed by a few more test models. However, the project encountered various mechanical issues that remained unresolved, including engine overheating, the problematic landing gear which caused the aircraft to crash onto its nose should the nose gear fail, and flight instability, among other issues. As a result, the RLM showed little enthusiasm for the Me 309, prioritizing increased production of the Me 109 instead. Introducing another fighter design would also inevitably lead to production delays. Moreover, refining the Me 309 design would likely necessitate additional time, possibly extending into months or even years. Consequently, a decision was made to abandon the development of the Me 309 entirely.

The Me 309 was an attempt to develop a completely new fighter to replace the Me 109. Given its many mechanical flaws, it did not go beyond the prototype stage. Source: /www.luftwaffephotos.com

However, Messerschmitt hoped that proposing a new variant of the twin-fuselage fighter based on the Me 309 might renew interest from the RLM. Unfortunately, this strategy didn’t yield the desired results. Despite some initial drawings, the aircraft designated as the Me 609 was abandoned at the beginning of 1944 in favor of the Me 262.

A drawing of the proposed “Me 609” aircraft. Source: D.Sharp Luftwaffe: Secret Designs of the Third Reich

Technical characteristics

Given that it was a paper proposal, and no working prototype was built, its overall technical specifications are rather obscure. In essence, the Me 609 consisted of paired Me 309 fuselages which were joined together by a central wing section. Given this fact, in theory, most of the components for this aircraft would be available and reused from the Me 309. The Me 309 was conceived as a single-seat fighter, featuring an all-metal construction with a low-wing design. So we can assume that the new Me 609 would also follow a similar construction.

The two fuselages were connected with the new inner wing section. Besides this, it also served to house the two main landing gear units. The nose wheel was located under the engine, and retracted to the rear. The pilot’s pressurized cockpit was located on the left fuselage, while; the right-sided fuselage had its cockpit covered.

The Me 309 used an unusual, at least for the Germans, tricycle landing gear unit. Source: www.luftwaffephotos.com

Depending on the source it was either powered by a  Daimler Benz 603 or 605 or a  2,000hp Jumo 213E june engine. In the case of the latter, the estimated maximum speed was to be 760 km/h. All of which were inverted V-12 engines.

The main armament was to consist of two 3 cm MK 108 and Two MK 103 cannons. Including either two 250 kg or one 500 kg bomb. Two more cannons could be mounted under the center wing section.

The Truth of it

The information as previously mentioned, however, may not be entirely accurate. According to various sources such as D. Herwing and H. Rode (Luftwaffe: Secret Projects Ground Attack and Special Purpose Aircraft), as well as several internet sources, it is asserted that the twin-fuselage Me 309 variant was designated as the Me 609. Contrary to this, D. Sharp (Luftwaffe: Secret Designs of the Third Reich) argues that this designation was incorrectly assigned to the project. The actual designation for it was Me 309 Zw (Zw standing for Zwilling, meaning twins). Claiming, the Me 609 was unrelated to this project. Sharp supports this assertion by citing surviving Messerschmitt documentation salvaged after the war, in which the projects are referred to as 309 Zw. Thus, the twin-fuselage fast bomber/destroyer based on the Me 309 existed only as a proposal, albeit under a different name.

Now, what about the aircraft bearing the Me 609 designation? Simply put, it did not exist. In reality, it was a designation that Messerschmitt applied to describe the Me 262 twin-engine fighter. Why this designation was used remains unknown, but it may have been employed to deceive the intelligence offices of the Western Allies

The evidence for the claim of the wrong designation lies in the old Messerschmitt documentation salvaged after the war. Here we can see the Me 262 which was for an unknown reason referred to as Me 609. Source: D. Sharp Luftwaffe: Secret Designs of the Third Reich

Conclusion 

The Me 309Zw project was an intriguing endeavor aimed at enhancing the overall performance of German fighters by integrating two fuselages. However, it failed to progress beyond the prototype stage, leaving us unable to determine its feasibility.

Me 309Zw Estimated Specifications

Wingspans 16 m / 52  ft 6  in
Length 9.52 m / 31 ft 2 in
Height 3.24 m / 10 ft  7 in
Wing Area 26.755 m² /  288 ft²
Engine Two 2,000hp Jumo 213E
Empty Weight 5,247 5kg / 11,660 lbs
Maximum Takeoff Weight 6,534kg / 14,520 lbs
Maximum Speed 760 km/h / 472mph
Crew 1 pilot
Armament
  • Two MK 108 and Two MK 103
  • Bomb load two 250 kg or one 500 kg

Illustration

 

Credits

  • Written by Marko P.
  • Edited by Henry H.
  • Illustrations by Oussama Mohamed “Godzilla”

Source:

  • D. Nesić  (2008)  Naoružanje Drugog Svetsko Rata-Nemačka. Beograd.
  • D. Monday (2006) The Hamlyn Concise Guide To Axis Aircraft OF World War II, Bounty Books.
  • J. R. Smith and A. L. Kay (1972) German Aircraft of the WW2, Putnam
  • D. Myhra (2000) Messerschmitt Me 209V1, Schiffer Military History
  • M. Griehl () X-planes German Luftwaffe prototypes 1930-1940, Frontline Book
  • D.Herwing and H. Rode (2002) Luftwaffe: Secret Projects Ground Attack and Special Purpose Aircraft, Midland
  •  D.Sharp (2018) Luftwaffe: Secret Designs of the Third Reich, Mortons

 

CR.32bis in Austrian Service

Austria (1936)

Biplane Fighter: Number operated 45

In the search for more modern fighters, Austria acquired some 45 CR.32bis biplane fighters from Italy. These were some of the best biplane designs in the years before the war, but were quickly deemed obsolete once they encountered more modern fighters. In Austrian hands, these would only have a limited service life, as two years later this country would be annexed by Nazi Germany.

Austrian-operated CR.32bis biplane fighter. Source: https://www.airhistory.net/photo/304058/177

History

Following the end of the First World War, the once mighty Austro-Hungarian Empire ceased to exist. Its territories were taken by its neighbors, or given to newly created states that emerged following the war. What was left of Austria was deprived of its military force and sounded by not-so-friendly countries.

To acquire some modern aircraft for its air force, an Austrian delegation visited Italy. After examining various designs, the Austrian Federal Ministry of National Defence agreed to buy 45 CR.32bis biplane fighter aircraft at the start of 1936. These were better-armed and slightly improved versions, with two additional machine guns positioned in the wings. Once in Austria, they were used to equip  Jagdgeschwader II stationed at Wiener Neustadt.

In total, Austria acquired 45 of the CR.32bis from Italy in early 1936. Source: forum.axishistory.com

A Brief CR.32  History

The success of the CR.30 prompted the Italians to further improve this design. A prototype of the improved CR.32 was completed and flight-tested in April 1933. Following the successful test trials, the aircraft was accepted to service and put into mass production, proving to be one of the better biplane designs that arose just before the Second World War. It achieved great export success as it was sold worldwide such as in China, Hungary, Spain, Venezuela, and Austria. While it performed well during the Spanish Civil War, the days of the biplane fighter were gone, replaced by the more modern single-wing fighter. Thus the Cr.32s in service by the Italian Air Force suffered heavy losses when they encountered more modern fighters.

The Italian CR.32 biplane fighter. Source: Wiki

In Austrian Service

As mentioned, the CR.32bis was allocated to the Jagdgeschwader II. this unit was divided into three squadrons (Jagdstaffeln) 4/II, 5II, and 6/II. Their service life within the Austrian Air Force was rather limited and besides some military exercises, they did not see any combat action.

Austria was never in a good geopolitical situation. From the north, they were constantly under pressure from Nazy Germany, who tried several times to direct the Austrian government to its side. For example, in 1934 Nazis organized the assassination of Austrian Chancellor Engelbert Dollfuss. While this did not change the political situation to Germany’s favor, due to Italian intervention, the Austrian government remained in a great crisis. By 1938, the relationship between Germany and Italy was improving, determining the fate of Austria. In March 1938, the German Army moved into Austria and essentially took over the country in an event known today as the  Anschluss.

The equipment of the Austrian Army and Air Force were captured by the Germans. The Jagdgeschwader II was renamed to I.Gruppe – Jagdgeschwader 138 and was relocated to Aspern. The Germans never tried to incorporate the CR.32 into their forces, they were only briefly used as training aircraft. Eventually, the 36 available CR.32 aircraft would be sold to Hungary which already had this aircraft.

A total of 45 CR.32 were allocated to the Jagdgeschwader II. Source: /fighters.forumactif.com
In German service, the CR.32 would see quite limited service as a training aircraft. Seeing no proposal to operate them any further, these would be sold to Hungary. Source:acesflyinghighthesurvivors.wordpress.com
At least one CR.32 would be damaged during a landing accident by the new owners. Source: Pinterest

Camouflage and Marking

The Austrians used a combination of silver paint and natural metal for this aircraft’s liveries. In addition, the wings struts were painted in black.  Regarding national marking, they added an Austrian flag which was painted on the aircraft tail. On the fuselage sides, a red circle with a white triangle was painted followed by a vertical red stripe.

The Austrians added a red-white-red flag which was painted on the aircraft tail. On the fuselage sides, usually a red circle with a white triangle was painted followed by a vertical red stripe. On occasions some aircraft such as this one received additional markings. Source:  fighters.forumactif.com

Technical Specification

The Fiat CR.32 was designed as a biplane, mixed-construction fighter. The fuselage frame was made using four longerons connected to a triangle-shaped framework. The fuselage was covered in sheet metal, except with some minor parts which were covered in fabric. Wings were made of two spars connected with a duralumin tube and then covered in fabric. The landing gear consisted of two forward-mounted wheels which were connected to the fuselage and a tail wheel. The armament consisted of two 7.7 cm (0.3 in), or two 12.7 cm (0.5 in) machine guns. The ammunition load for the former was 750 and the latter 350 per machine gun. Both of these were mounted above the engine compartment.

The CR.32bis was a slightly improved version that incorporated the addition of two lower-wing positioned machine guns. Source: acesflyinghighthesurvivors.wordpress.com

Conclusion

The CR.32bis was the best available Austrian fighter aircraft. Unfortunately for them, the geopolitical situation in this part of Europe was not in their favor. The rising Nazi Germany for years tried to annex this small country, which they eventually achieved in 1938. The annexation of Austria also meant the end of their short-lived Air Force.

CR.32bis  Specifications

Wingspans 9.5 m / 31  ft 2  in
Length 7.45 m / 24 ft 5  in
Height 2.63 m / 8  ft 7  in
Wing Area 22.1 m² / 238 ft²
Engine One 600 hp Fiat A.30 RA bis 12-cylinder piston engine
Empty Weight 1,400 kg / 3,086 lbs
Maximum Take-off Weight 1,970 kg / 4,343 lbs
Maximum Speed 350 km/h / 217 mph
Range 680 km / 422 miles
Maximum Service Ceiling 8,800 m / 28,870 ft
Crew 1 pilot
Armament
  • Two 12,7 mm or two 7.7 mm machine guns in the upper fuselage
  • Two 7.7 mm in the lower wings

Illustration

 

Credits

  • Written by Marko P.
  • Edited by Henry H.
  • Illustrations by Oussama Mohamed “Godzilla”

Source:

  • D. Nesic  (2008)  Naoružanje Drugog Svetsko Rata-Italija
  • (1996) CR 32 Ali D’ITalia, La Bancarella Aeronautica Torino
  • G. Cattaneo (1965) The Fiat CR.32, Profile Publication
  • G. punka (2000) Fiat CR 32/CR 42 In Action, Signal publication
  • D. Monday (2006) The Hamlyn Concise Guide To Axis Aircraft OF World War II, Bounty Books

 

 

 

Me 309

Nazi Germany (1943)

Fighter: Four prototypes Built

The Messerschmitt Me 109, although an outstanding aircraft, still had room for improvement. Its most noticeable shortcomings included a rather small operational radius, significantly reducing its combat potential in prolonged engagements. To address this, Messerschmitt initiated the development of a successor model designated as the Me 309. However, from the outset, this new fighter was plagued with numerous mechanical faults that could not be resolved in the foreseeable future. Consequently, only four prototypes were built before the project was ultimately canceled.

The Me 309 first prototype. Source: https://www.luftwaffephotos.com/lme2091.htm

History

At the onset of the Second World War, Germany relied heavily on the Me 109 as its primary fighter aircraft. Renowned for its exceptional performance and cost-effectiveness, the Me 109 outmatched most of the enemy fighters it encountered over Europe. Following the fall of France in June 1940, Germany launched a significant bombing campaign against the UK. This prolonged engagement highlighted a critical issue: the Me 109’s limited operational range prevented it from carrying out long-range fighter sweeps, or being usable as a bomber escort.

Recognizing the urgent need for enhancements, Messerschmitt began experiments on improving the performance, and range, of the Me 109. Initial assessments underscored the necessity for substantial improvements, including an 85% increase in operational range and a minimum 25% boost in maximum speed. Additionally, there were aspirations to augment its firepower, introduce a pressurized cockpit, implement a tricycle undercarriage, and incorporate retractable radiators. Before commencing work on a completely new fighter, Messerschmitt opted to experiment with these features by modifying an existing Me 109F

Some of the changes such as the tricycle undercarriage were first tested on one Me 109. Source: https://militarymatters.online/forgotten-aircraft/the-messerschmitt-me-309-redundant-beauty/

The new fighter project was initiated by Messerschmitt in 1940. However, the German Aviation Ministry (RLM) was not enthusiastic about it, after significant delays. Actual work on the project didn’t commence until the end of 1941. The project, designated Me 309, was led by Woldemar Voigt and Richard Bauer. It’s worth noting that Messerschmitt’s previous attempt to develop a fighter, based on the record-breaking Me 209, failed because its airframe wasn’t suitable for military purposes. Despite the RLM’s initial skepticism towards the Me 309, they eventually ordered nine prototypes.

The side view of the Me 209V1 prototype. While initially used as a speed record-breaker, Messerschmitt tried to adopt it for the military role but ultimately failed in this. Source: ww2fighters.e-monsite.com

The first Me 309 V-1 (GE-CU) prototype was completed in June 1942, and immediately underwent ground trials at the end of that month. However, almost from the outset, a major issue became apparent, the new landing wheel configuration proved difficult to control on the ground. Subsequent flight tests revealed additional challenges, including strong vibrations at high speeds. In July 1942, after a series of modifications, the prototype underwent flight testing once more, only to encounter new problems with the landing gear. The hydraulic retraction system was found to be inadequate, and issues with engine overheating and aerodynamic instability persisted. On one occasion, test pilot Karl Baur was forced to abort the flight after just seven minutes in the air.

Addressing these issues required further modifications, including redesigning the tailplane and improving the hydraulic system for the landing gear. Despite these efforts, subsequent test flights did not yield significant improvements in the overall flight performance of the Me 309. Messerschmitt’s test pilot, Fritz Wendel, expressed dissatisfaction with the aircraft, noting that its flight characteristics were not markedly superior to those of the Me 109. He criticized the high landing speed and the poor design of the control surfaces.

Not ready to abandon the Me 309 prematurely, the first prototype underwent evaluation at the Rechlin test center for further assessment. On the 20th of November 1942, a report was issued deeming the overall performance of the Me 309 unpromising, even inferior to the new Me 109G. Consequently, the RLM reduced the initial production order from nine prototypes to just four. Initially, the RLM had little enthusiasm for the Me 309, and still preferred instead to prioritize increased production of the Me 109. Introducing another fighter design would inevitably cause production delays. Compounding the industrial challenges, perfecting the Me 309 design would likely require additional time,  months if not years of work.

Despite these setbacks, the development of the Me 309 continued at a sluggish pace. The first prototype was initially equipped with a 1,750 hp DB603A-1 engine. It would later be replaced by a 1,450 hp DB 605B engine instead during the testing phase. During one landing, the front landing gear collapsed, causing the aircraft to nose down. Fortunately, the damage sustained was minor. However, the same couldn’t be said for the second prototype (GE-CV), which underwent flight testing on November 28, 1942. Upon landing during its maiden flight, the front landing gear failed, resulting in a hard impact on the ground. The force of the impact nearly split the aircraft into two parts, rendering it extensively damaged and subsequently written off. Despite this setback, two more prototypes were constructed during 1943.

The Me 309 had a troublesome landing gear and a tendency to flip over the nose. In one such accident, the second prototype was lost. Source: https://militarymatters.online/forgotten-aircraft/the-messerschmitt-me-309-redundant-beauty/

Technical characteristics

The Me 309 was conceived as a single-seat fighter, featuring an all-metal construction with a low-wing design. There is limited information available regarding its overall construction. The fuselage was of an oval shape, while the wings were characterized by a dihedral angle with rounded tips, accompanied by automatic leading-edge slots for better maneuverability at low speed. Notably, the wings also incorporated large flaps extending from the wing roots to the ailerons’ end. The canopy was fully glazed, affording excellent visibility of the surroundings.

There is some disagreement among available sources regarding the precise engine used in this aircraft. According to J.R. Smith and A.L. Kay in (German Aircraft of WWII) it was initially powered by a 1,750 hp DB 603A-1 engine, which enabled the Me 309 to achieve a maximum speed of 733 km/h at an altitude of 8,500 meters. This claim is supported by B.C. Wheeler in (Aviation Archive: German Fighters of WWII)  although Wheeler does not specify which DB 603 engine was used. On the other hand, Jean-Denis G.G. Lepage, in (Aircraft of the Luftwaffe) mentions that the Daimler-Benz DB 603G engine model was used, with the same maximum speed being achieved. The DB 603G is the likely most correct engine used on the Me 309, considering it was an experimental high-altitude model that never entered mass use.

The later prototypes were powered by a smaller 1,450 hp DB 605B engine. Even the first prototype was eventually reequipped with this engine. As a result, the overall performance dropped significantly to 575 km/h, according to D. Nesić (Naoružanje Drugog Svetsko Rata-Nemačka).

With a fuel capacity of 880 liters, its operational range extended to 1,400 km. Equipped with a retractable ventral radiator positioned under the fuselage, the aircraft’s landing gear retracted inward into the wings. A notable departure from convention was the absence of the standard tailwheel; instead, it featured a nosewheel, retracting rearward into the fuselage’s front section.

The Me 309 was initially tested with the DB 603A-1 engine with which it achieved a maximum speed of 733 km/.h. Source: http://www.luftwaffephotos.com/lme2091.htm
Rear view of the Me 309. Source: http://www.luftwaffephotos.com/lme2091.htm
The Me 309 incorporated some new features such as the new landing gear and a retracting radiator both of which can be seen here. Source: airpages.ru

Fate

Despite the considerable investment of time and resources into the Me 309 project, its overall flight performance fell short, ultimately leading to the project’s demise. By the beginning of 1943, the RLM had lost interest in the aircraft, prompting the cancellation of the project after the completion of four prototypes. Despite the cancellation, Messerschmitt proceeded to develop two additional prototypes.

One of these, the Me 309V-3 (CA-NK or CA-CW), was intended as a replacement for the lost V-2 prototype. Its maiden flight took place in March or April of 1943. The fourth prototype marked a significant milestone as it was the first to be equipped with offensive armament, including four 13 mm MG 131 (300 rounds), two 20 mm MG 151 (150 rounds), and two 30 mm MK 108 (65 rounds) cannons. Alternatively, it could be outfitted with two 15 mm MG 151 cannons and three 13 mm MG 131s. Although these armaments were primarily experimental and not used operationally, they were essential for various testing purposes.

Unfortunately, the fate of the last two prototypes remains unclear, with records suggesting they were lost during Allied bombing raids in 1944.

Despite the Messerschmitt hope the Me 309 would not be adopted for service, and the few built prototypes would be mainly used for various testing and evaluation. Source: http://www.luftwaffephotos.com/lme2091.htm

Even before the official cancellation, Messerschmitt officials were hopeful for a larger production order. To this end, they presented several variant proposals for the Me 309. The Me 309A was designed as a fighter variant, equipped with one MG 151 cannon and two MG 131 machine guns. The Me 309B was intended to serve as a fighter-bomber variant, armed with two 250 kg (550 lbs) bombs. As for the Me 309C, it was designed as a destroyer, featuring three MG 151 cannons and up to four MG 131s. An intriguing proposal was the Me 309 Zwilling (Eng. Twins), which involved two aircraft joined together in a configuration reminiscent of the post-war US F-82, but ultimately, this concept did not materialize.

A drawing of the proposed Me 309zw aircraft. Source: D.Sharp Luftwaffe: Secret Designs of the Third Reich

 

Interestingly in 1944 Japan expressed interest in its design and asked for plans and drawings of the Me309V-3 aircraft. But nothing came of this in the end.

Prototypes

  • Me 309V-1 – First prototype powered by a  1,750 hp DB 603A-1 engine
  • Me 309V-2 –  Second prototype lost during the first test flight
  • Me 309V-3 – This prototype was built in early 1943 as a replacement for the second prototype
  • Me 309V-4 – First prototype to be armed.

Proposed Variants

  • Me 309A – Proposed fighter variant
  • Me 309B – Proposed  fighter-bomber variant
  • Me 309C –Proposed destroyer variant
  • Me 309zw- Proposed twi-aircraft configuration

Conclusion 

The Me 309, despite the investment and the hope that it would be an adequate successor to the Me 109, proved to be a troubled design and pulled down by wartime pragmatism. From the start, it was plagued by various mechanical problems that were never resolved. The fact that RLM was never interested that much in such a project did not help either. As it would take considerable time to fully remediate all the noted issues, the project was abandoned in favor of the latter Me 262.

Me 309V-1 Specifications

Wingspans 11.04 m / 36  ft 2  in
Length 9.46 m / 31 ft 1 in
Height 3.4 m /  ft
Wing Area 16.55 m² /  178.08 ft²
Engine One 1,750 hp DB 603A-1
Empty Weight 3,530 5kg / 7,784 lbs
Maximum Takeoff Weight 4,250 kg / 9,371 lbs
Maximum Speed 733 km/h / 455 mph
Cruising speed 665 km/h / 413 mph
Range 1,400 km / 870 miles
Maximum Service Ceiling 12,000 m  / 39,360 ft
Climb to 8 km In 10 minutes
Crew 1 pilot
Armament

Illustration

Credits

  • Written by Marko P.
  • Edited by Henry H.
  • Illustrations by Oussama Mohamed “Godzilla”

Source:

  • D. Nesić  (2008)  Naoružanje Drugog Svetsko Rata-Nemačka. Beograd.
  • D. Monday (2006) The Hamlyn Concise Guide To Axis Aircraft OF World War II, Bounty Books.
  • J. R. Smith and A. L. Kay (1972) German Aircraft of the WW2, Putnam
  • D. Myhra (2000) Messerschmitt Me 209V1, Schiffer Military History
  • M. Griehl () X-planes German Luftwaffe prototypes 1930-1940, Frontline Book
  •  D.Sharp (2018) Luftwaffe: Secret Designs of the Third Reich, Mortons
  • Jean-Denis G.G. Lepage (2009) Aircraft Of The Luftwaffe, McFarland & Company, Inc
  • B. C. Wheeler (2014) Aviation Archive German Fighters of WWII, Kelsey Publishing Group

 

 

Me 109 in Independent State of Croatia Service

Independent State of Croatia flag Independent State of Croatia (1944-1945)
Fighter –  15 to 30 Operated

Following the collapse of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia after the Axis invasions in April of 1941, the Nezavisna Država Hrvatska (Eng. Independent State of Croatia) was created. It immediately began forming its military, including an air force. This air force, while managing to acquire a few hundred aircraft of various types, always lacked fighter planes. Nothing major was done to improve them in this regard up to 1944, when finally, Germany agreed to send a small group of Me 109’s to the NDH to bolster their fighter force.

An Me 109G in NDH Service. Source: www.britmodeller.com

History

After Italy’s unsuccessful invasion of Greece, Benito Mussolini was forced to ask his German ally for help. Adolf Hitler agreed to assist, fearing that a possible Allied attack through the Balkans would reach Romania and its vital oil fields. In the path of the German advance towards Greece stood Yugoslavia, whose government initially agreed to join the Axis side. This agreement was short-lived, as the Yugoslav government was overthrown by an anti-Axis, pro-Allied military coup at the end of March 1941. Hitler immediately gave an order for the preparation of the invasion of Yugoslavia. The war that began on 6th April 1941, sometimes called the April War, was a short one and ended with a Yugoslav defeat and the division of its territory between the Axis powers.

With the collapse of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, Croatia, with German aid, was finally able to declare independence, albeit becoming a fascist puppet state. It was officially formed on the 10th of April 1941. The new state received a significant territorial expansion by annexing most of western Yugoslavia, including Bosnia, parts of Serbia, and Montenegro.

While the conquest of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia proved to be an easy task for the Axis, holding these territories proved to be much more difficult. This was mainly due to two major resistance movements that were actively engaged in sabotage, destroying railways and bridges, and attacking isolated occupation units’ positions and strong points. Despite attempts to suppress these attacks, the resistance movements, especially the Communist Partisans, grew rapidly, forcing the Germans and their Allies to introduce ever-larger occupation forces. The NDH forces were especially targeted by the resistance as they committed numerous war crimes, including mass murders and deportations to concentration camps. Thanks to German help, they managed to form a small air force that had in its inventory all kinds of obsolete, and in rare cases, modern equipment. By 1943, it was in the process of reorganization, and the NDH officials during this period often asked their German overlords for more modern aircraft. Sometimes they even portrayed their own Air Force as being weaker than it was in the hope of getting military aid. Eventually, near the end of the war, several dozen Me 109s were sent from Germany to NDH.

A Brief Me 109 History

The Me 109 was Willy Messerschmitt’s response to the German Air Force’s request for a modern fighter in 1934. Despite being a completely unknown aircraft designer, his aircraft, thanks to its simplicity and performance, easily beat the competition. Soon after it entered mass production in 1936. It was quite an advanced design for its time and superior to most fighters around the world. Over the years various versions were built, each introducing various modifications. Some were even specially made for various other roles, such as training or reconnaissance. By the end of the war over 30.000 were built making it the second most produced military aircraft in history. Given the sheer number of produced aircraft, it should not be surprising that many were sold or given to various nations in Europe.

One of the most iconic fighters of the Second World War was the Me 109. Source: Wiki

The Need of the NDH Air Force

Following the collapse of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, the NDH began organizing its newly created armed forces. Its air force was created on the 19th of April, 1941. Immediately, work began on creating an adequate structural organization, acquiring manpower, and procuring equipment. Initially, plans for arming this Air Force were ambitious and included acquiring the newest German aircraft design. For example, the main fighter aircraft was to be the Me 109E. A single fighter group would consist of 22 such aircraft. The Germans on the other hand decided to ignore this request, as these planes were needed for the upcoming invasion of the Soviet Union. They also did not fully trust the NDH officials. As a compromise, the NDH air force was to be equipped with the stockpiles of captured Yugoslavian aircraft. The Germans, once again disappointed in the state of their air force, gave the NDH only those aircraft that were mostly obsolete while transferring the better aircraft, like the Hurricanes, to Romania instead.

Prior to the war the Kingdom of Yugoslavia operated a number of modern Me 109E fighters. Despite the NDH’s constant requests to the Germans to deliver at least some of these nothing came of this. Source:  www.paluba.info

Under German Command

While the Germans did not provide the NDH with the Me 109, the Croatian pilots still got the chance to fly on them. While receiving no major import of equipment from their ally, the NDH still wanted to have a good relationship with the Germans. When the massive invasions on the Soviet Union were launched, while the NDH did not directly participate in this attack, its government issued a proclamation for volunteers at the start of July 1941. It called for volunteers among the Croatian population to join the German Army. The NDH Air Force also contributed to this voluntary enlisting. While it lacked equipment, it did not have shortages of personnel willing to go and fight the Soviets.  For this purpose, the 4th Air Force Regiment was formed. It consisted of the 4th Air Force Fighter Group and the 5th Air Force Bomber Group. The 4th Group had in total over 200 members. Once assembled, the fighter group was transported to Furth in Germany where their training was to commence. The training officially began on the 19th of July 1941. For this purpose, the Germans provided some Bu 133, Ar 96, and even some older Me 109D planes. During the training process, one pilot was killed in an accident. During this period the 4th Group was divided into two newly created 10th and 11th squadrons

At the end of September 1941, elements from the 10th Squadron were sent to fight on the Eastern Front. They arrived on the 6th of October and were allocated to the Jagdgeschwader (Eng. Fighter wing) 52. They were to pilot five allocated Me 109Es, with six more being expected to arrive later. Their first combat flight mission occurred on the 9th of October.  They were patrolling the area around Ahtijevka-Krasnograd when the unit spotted a lone Soviet aircraft. It was engaged and shot down by a German pilot who served as a liaison officer in this unit. The following month saw the unit mainly tasked with patrolling and protecting the German airfields in this region. On the 2nd of November, the first air victory was achieved by Croatian pilots. Seven days later another victory was scored. On the 16th of November, the German liaison officer  Lieutenant Baumgarten managed to achieve another victory. He died two days later when he collided in mid-air with a Soviet Aircraft. At the end of November, a Soviet I-16 fighter was shot down. At the start of the following month, the first Croatian pilot, Ivan Karner, lost his life in an accident.

During December they were stationed in the Azov area. During January, pilots from this unit managed to shoot down some 23 Soviet aircraft. By April 1942, 12 more enemy aircraft were shot down over the Kerch Peninsula. In May, the whole unit was renamed to Jagdgruppe Džal (Eng. Fighter Group Džal) which was a common thing for the Germans to name particular military groups for their commanders, in this case, Colonel Franjo Džal. By that time the unit operated the older Me 109E and requested the delivery of newer models. In July 1942, the first Me 109G-2 version began to reach this unit. July and August were quite successful for the Croatian pilots who achieved many air victories, some 137 at that point, against various types of Soviet aircraft, despite being used mainly for support missions.

The Croatian pilots returned to the NDH at the end of 1942 for rest and recuperation. By this point, they had achieved 164 confirmed air victories over 3,300 flights. The best fighter ace of this unit was Cvitan Galić who was credited with 24 air victories, plus 7 more that were not confirmed. The unit was not without casualties as six pilots were lost.  After a few months spent resting, they returned to the Soviet Union in February 1943. They were stationed in Crimea and saw heavy action there. Interestingly they encountered Allied-supplied Spitfires and P-39s. While they continued bringing down many more Soviet pilots, the rapid deterioration on the frontlines caused some of these pilots to second-guess their place in the war. In May and June, at least three pilots defected to the Soviet Union. Fearing that more would follow, the Germans prohibited any further flights by Croatian pilots. The unit commander was temporarily removed from this post but reinstated later in September 1943. In late October more combat flight patrols with new pilots were initiated. The 4th Group in October had only 8 fully operational aircraft.

The 4th Group mainly operated the Me 109E with a better model arriving later into the war. Source: www.destinationsjourney.com
In July 1942 first Me 109G-2 fighter versions began to reach this unit, followed by many more different versions. Source; T. Likso and D. Čanak The Croatian Air Force In The Second World War

This unit would remain active on the Eastern Front in 1944. In September 1944, two more pilots defected to the Soviet Side, forcing the Germans to once again forbid the remaining Croatian pilots from flying. In November, the unit was disbanded and its personnel received infantry training.  In early 1945 these saw action as standard infantry in Poland. After March 1945 those that survived were sent back to the NDH. In total the 4th Group that served over four years on the Eastern Front was credited with the destruction of over 300 enemy aircraft.

Despite being a small unit the 4th Squadron pilots managed to claim 300 enemy aircraft. Source: T. Likso and D. Čanak The Croatian Air Force In The Second World War

In NDH service

It was not until early 1945 that the first Me 109 began to arrive in the NDH itself. These included the G-6, 14, and 10 variants. These aircraft were acquired for the 4th Fighter Group (11th and 12th Squadrons). While nominally part of the NDH Air Force, the 4th Fighter Group was actually under the direct control of the Germans. While 15 aircraft were to be delivered, 5 of them never reached Croatia as they were lost during the transit. These numbers are according to T. Likso and D. Čanak. (The Croatian Air Force In The Second World War). However, both authors expressed their doubts about the precise number of delivered aircraft. They believe that that number was actually higher and that more than 15 aircraft were delivered.

Author V. V. Mikić (Zrakoplovstvo Nezavisne Države Hrvatske 1941-1945) gives a different account. According to him, some 30 Me 109s were allocated to the NDH service. The first 10 aircraft arrived at the end of November 1944. The second group of 10 aircraft reached NDH  at the end of 1944. The last 10 were to arrive in January 1945. On transit flight two of them accidentally collided, with one more benign heavily damaged during the landing.

In The Balkans 

Given that these fighters arrived late into the war, there is little surviving documentation that mentions their use in combat. In March, two Me 109s were used to attack a partisan airfield Smrdan but without any success.

During March and April 1945, some of these newly arrived aircraft were used for crew training.  These flights mainly lasted between 10 to 15 minutes, and the older Me 109G-6 was used for this purpose. On the 26th of March, and later on the 2nd of April, ground attacks against Partisan-held airfields were made.

By 1945, defections from the NDH’s forces became a common occurrence, and they were having a hard time keeping the Army intact. The Air Force was not an exception to this, as its pilots often managed to escape either to the Allies in Italy, or the Yugoslav Partisans. On the 16th of April 1945, while flying a patrol mission, two Me 109s escaped to Italy and surrendered to the Allies. These were piloted by Josip Ceković, flying aMe 109G-10, and Vladimir Sandtner, in a Me 109G-14. The first pilot escaped to Falconara and the latter to Ancona. Allegedly, these two fighters had acted as a guard to a secret NDH delegation that was to fly to Italy and ask the Allies for peace, and possibly even switch sides.

In late April 1945 pilot Josip Ceković while flying a Me 109G-10 escaped to Falconara in Italy and surrendered to the Allies. Source: www.britmodeller.com

Two more pilots deserted with their aircraft, both flying Me 109G-10s, on the 20th of April. These were part of a group of four Me 109s that were tasked with attacking Partisan ground targets. Instead, two pilots defected and flew to the city of Mostar, which was at that time in Partisan hands. They were immediately put into partisan service after the NDH symbols were repainted. On the 7th of May, they saw action against the retreating Axis ground forces.

On the 23rd of April 1945 while on patrol, two NDH Me 109s spotted two Allied  P-51s. The Me 109 pilots managed to fly at a close range of some 80 meters and opened fire. One of the P-51s caught fire, and while the pilot tried to escape a second burst of cannon fire from the Me 109 brought it down. They were intercepted by two more P-51s. The NDH aircraft, despite receiving many hits, managed to damage another P-51. As more Allied fighters began to approach this engagement, the Me 109s began to fly away toward their base of operation, managing to escape the pursuers.

The few remaining Me 109s were used in the last days of the war. They tried to defend the Axis positions at the Sermian Front in the Eastern part of Croatia. This was a vital defense line for the remaining Axis Forces that was for some time besieged by the advancing Partisans. During this time, the Me 109 participated in a few skirmishes with the Partisan-operated Yak fighters. The NDH Me 109s generally avoided direct fights as they were severely outnumbered.

In the last days of the war, many of the Me 109 escaped to Austria. It is believed that up to 17 aircraft made this flight, and they were left abandoned, later to be put to use by the advancing Partisans

Camo and markings

The NDH Me 109s were left in German late time war-type camouflages. This usually consisted of  Dunkelgrun (Eng. Dark green) and Grau  (Eng. Grey) on the upper aircraft surfaces, and  Hellblau (Eng. Sky Blue) on the lower surfaces. A yellow-painted ring followed the black nose. To the rear, the usually yellow-painted band that goes around the fuselage was repainted in green. A standard Croatian white and red checkerboard coat of arms was painted on the tail unit. Starting from 24th February 1945 the NDH Air Force introduced the use of a black trefoil that was painted on the aircraft fuselage sides or wings.

A good view of the NDH Me 109 side view, notice the large black trefoil that was painted on the aircraft fuselage sides or wings. Source: falkeeins.blogspot.com

Technical Specification

The Bf 109 was a low-wing, all-metal, single-seat fighter. To keep the production of this aircraft as simple as possible, Messerschmitt engineers decided to develop a monocoque fuselage that was divided into two halves. These halves would be placed together and connected using simple flush rivets, thus creating a simple base on which remaining components, like the engine, wings, and instruments would be installed.

In order to provide room for the retracting landing gear, Messerschmitt intentionally used only a single wing spar which was positioned quite to the rear of the wing. This spar had to be sufficiently strong to withstand the load forces that acted on the wings during flight. The wings were connected to the fuselage by four strong bolts. This design enables the wings to have a rather simple overall construction with the added benefit of being cheap to produce. During the Bf 109’s later service life, the damaged wings could be simply replaced with others on hand. The wings were also very thin, which provided the aircraft with better overall control at lower speeds but also reduced drag which in turn increased the overall maximum speed

The cockpit was placed in the center of the fuselage. It was a fully enclosed compartment that was riveted to the fuselage. The Bf 109 cockpit itself was quite cramped. The Me 109 possessed quite an unusual landing gear arrangement. The landing gear was mainly connected to the lower center base of the fuselage, which meant that the majority of the weight of the aircraft would be centered at this point. The two landing gear struts retracted outward towards the wings.

As the production of this aircraft went on for years, various modifications and improvements were carried out to improve the flight performance. This included its overall shape, engine, armament, and instrumentation. For example, the Me 109B-1 which was introduced before the outbreak of the war in Europe, was powered by a 635 hp Jumo 210D engine and armed with three 7.92 mm MG 17 machine guns

The later Me 109G-6 which was introduced to service in early 1943 was powered by a much stronger  1,475 hp DB605A engine. In addition, the armament was improved with either one 30 mm (1.18 in), or two 20 mm (0.78 in) cannons and additional two 13 mm (0.51 in) machine guns  It was a mass-produced fighter aircraft that stayed in service up to the end of the war. There were several sub-variants of the G-6 some of which were the R-2 reconnaissance, R-3 with larger fuel load, and R-6 with stronger armament in the wings.

The G-14 variant incorporated some minor changes mainly intended to standardize some parts of the Me 109 series. This includes using the erla haube type canopy, a larger tail fin, and standardized the use of methanol-water injection. The G-14 was an attempt to consolidate all of the modifications that had accumulated with the G-6 into a common variant, the G-10 was converted from old airframes to get the newer DB 605D engine into service faster.

The G-10 (essentially modified G-14/G-6) was an attempt to increase the overall flight speed and high-altitude performance by introducing the new DB 605D engine equipped with a larger supercharger. In addition, this variant received several modifications such as a reinforced, lengthened tail wheel strut, using wider front wheels, somewhat larger wings, etc. It was introduced to service in late 1944 and saw relatively limited combat action due to this.

Conclusion

The Me 109 was the best NDH fighter during the war. Unfortunately for the NDH, these began to arrive at the end of 1944. It is way too late and in too few numbers to have any meaningful impact on the war in Yugoslavia. Lack of fuel, the Allied air supremacy, and the rapidly collapsing Axis resistance meant that these stood little chance to effectively fight back.

Me 109G-6 Specifications

Wingspans 9,92 m / 32  ft 6  in
Length 9 m / 29 ft 7  in
Height 2.6 m / 8  ft 6  in
Wing Area 16.2 m² / 175 ft²
Engine One 1,475 hp DB605 AM
Empty Weight 2,700 kg / 5,950  lbs
Maximum Take-off Weight 3,200 kg / 7,055  lbs
Maximum Speed 620 km/h / 373 mph
Range 600 km / 620 miles
Maximum Service Ceiling 11,550m / 37,895 ft
Crew 1 pilot
Armament
  • One 30 mm (1.18 in), or two 20 mm (0.78 in) cannons and two 13 mm (0.51 in) machine guns

Illustration

Credits

  • Written by Marko P.
  • Edited by Henry H.
  • Illustrated by Godzilla

Source:

  • A. Pelletier (2002) French Fighters Of World War II in Action, Squadron/Signal Publication
  • J. R. Beaman (1983) Messerschmitt  Bf 109 in action part 2, Squadron publication
  • V. V. Mikić, (2000) Zrakoplovstvo Nezavisne Države Hrvatske 1941-1945, Vojno  istorijski institut Vojske Jugoslavije.
  • T. Likso and Danko Č. (1998) The Croatian Air Force In The Second World War, Nacionalna Sveučilišna Zagreb
  • J. R. Smith and A. L. Kay (1990) German Aircraft of the Second World War, Putnam
  • D. Monday (2006) The Hamlyn Concise Guide To Axis Aircraft OF World War II, Bounty Books
  • C. Chants (2007) Aircraft of World War II, Grange Books.

 

 

 

 

Me 209A

Nazi Germany (1943)

Fighter: Four prototypes Built

Upon its introduction before the outbreak of the Second World War, the German Me 109 emerged as one of the premier fighter designs globally. While it proved formidable during the conflict, rival aircraft gradually matched and even exceeded its performance in several key areas. In a bid to secure a successor for the Me 109 late in the war, Messerschmitt endeavored to develop the Me 209A, a highly modified design based on its predecessor. Despite demonstrating promising flight attributes, logistical constraints hindered its adoption for active service.

The Me 209A Source: www.luftwaffephotos.com

History

While the Germans acknowledged the effectiveness of the Me 109, it became evident that a new fighter design, or serious enhancements to the existing model, would be necessary. In early 1941, Messerschmitt began developing a successor to the Me 109. This exploration resulted in the creation of the Me 309. It was a brand-new fighter aircraft that incorporated a new fuselage design, larger wings, and a tricycle undercarriage. It was powered by a 1,750 hp DB 603A-1. A few different armament systems were to be tested including four 13 mm MG 131 (300 rounds), two 2 cm MG 151 (150 rounds), and two 30 mm MK 108 (65 rounds) cannons. Alternatively, it could be outfitted with two 15 mm MG 151 cannons and three 13 mm MG 131s.

By June 1942, the prototype underwent flight testing. Despite an initially promising design, testing revealed that the Me 309 did not offer significant improvements over the Me 109G, which was already in mass production. Consequently, recognizing the impracticality of further investment, the Me 309 project was ultimately terminated.

The Me 309 was one of the Messerschmitt failed attempts to develop a successor for the Me 109. Source: www.luftwaffephotos.com

As the development of the Me 309 proved fruitless, Messerschmitt continued to strive towards a suitable replacement for the Me 109. Fortunately for the company, the German Air Ministry (RLM) initiated the development of a new high-altitude fighter on April 23, 1943. In response, Messerschmitt introduced the Me 209. Interestingly, this name was recycled from an earlier project, the original Me 209, which had been crafted specifically to set world-breaking speed records. However, it was ill-suited for military purposes and the project was ultimately shelved having fulfilled its original purpose. Despite this, Messerschmitt endeavored to develop a viable fighter based on the Me 209 but met with little success. To avoid potential confusion, the new project, which bore no resemblance to the record-breaking aircraft, was designated as the Me 209A (also occasionally referred to as the Me 209-II).

The Me 209 which had been crafted specifically to set world-breaking speed records, proved to be unsuited for fighter adaptation. Source: ww2fighters.e-monsite.com

In order to expedite development and minimize costs, the design of this new fighter used many components from the Me 109. A powerful engine was essential for achieving optimal flight performance. Thus, the prototype, powered by a 1,750 PS DB 603A-1 engine, underwent completion and testing in early November 1943, with Fritz Wendel as the pilot. To avoid confusion, it was designated as the Me 209V-5 (SP-LJ), distinguishing it from the original Me 209 prototypes, V-1 to V-4.

The success of the first prototype led to the completion and testing of a second prototype by the end of 1943, both exhibiting impressive flight characteristics. Encouraged by this achievement, construction of another prototype commenced. However, due to shortages of the DB 603A-1 engine, the decision was made to utilize the 1,750 hp Jumo 213E instead. This third prototype underwent flight testing in May 1944, prompting a designation change to Me 209A. The prototypes, with their alternate engine configurations, were then distinguished with the suffixes A-0, A-1, and A-2 for the first, second, and third, respectively.

Technical characteristics

Unfortunately given the obscurity of this project, its overall technical specifications are somewhat ambiguous. What is known is that it incorporated some 65% of its construction from the Me 109G. The original Me 109 fuselage was a monocoque design that was divided into two halves. These halves would be placed together and connected using simple flush rivets, thus creating a simple base on which remaining components, like the engine, wings, and instruments would be installed.

In order to accommodate the retracting landing gear, Messerschmitt deliberately opted for a single wing spar positioned towards the rear of the wing. This spar needed to be robust enough to withstand the flight’s load forces. The wings were attached to the fuselage by four sturdy bolts, simplifying the overall wing construction and reducing production costs. The Me209A boasted a larger wingspan and area, consequently increasing wing loading by 25% compared to the original Me 109. Furthermore, alterations were made to the wings and tail to address the Me 109’s strong yaw forces on takeoff. Whether these adjustments successfully rectified the issue in the Me 209A remains unclear according to available sources.

Initially, it was powered by a 1,750 hp DB 603A-1 engine which was provided with an annular radiator and a three-blade propeller. With this engine, a maximum record speed achieved was 724 km/h 450 mph at an altitude of nearly 7 km (22,960 ft). The third prototype (A-2) received a new 1,750 hp Jumo 213E engine. It too was provided with an annular radiator. With it, a maximum speed of 660 km/h (410 mph) was achieved at an altitude of 6 km (19/680 ft)

The canopy was placed in the center of the fuselage. It was a fully enclosed compartment that was riveted to the fuselage.

The Me 109 boasted an unconventional landing gear arrangement, at least for German standards, with the landing gear primarily affixed to the lower center base of the fuselage. This configuration centralized the aircraft’s weight at this pivotal point, while the two landing gear struts extended outward toward the wings. In contrast, the Me 209 utilized a wide-track undercarriage unit, with the pivot points being out on the wings.

Various sources have proposed different armament configurations for the Me 209. One suggestion was the installation of two 3 cm MK 108 cannons, each equipped with 70 rounds of ammunition, alongside two 2 cm MG 151 cannons with 250 rounds per cannon, all to be housed within the aircraft’s wings. Alternatively, another proposal suggested the placement of four MK 108 cannons within the wings and two MG 151 cannons positioned above the engine compartment. However, it remains unclear whether any of these proposed armament configurations were ever implemented on the Me 209A.

The side view of the only photograph of the Me 20A first prototype. Source: http://www.luftwaffephotos.com/lme2091.htm

Fate

In 1944, further testing ensued, yet for Messerschmitt, the advent of the new Fw 190D posed a challenge. The Fw 109D, slowly making its way into production, boasted better performance, being faster in both high and low altitudes. What ultimately sealed the fate of the Me 209A project was the swiftness and cost-effectiveness with which the Fw 190D could be put into production. While the Me 209 incorporated many components from the Me 109, setting up its production would demand considerable time. A luxury in short supply for the Germans in 1944. Additionally, Messerschmitt’s focus at that time was squarely on the new Me 262 production, leaving scant resources to spare for yet another piston-powered fighter.

Despite these challenges, Messerschmitt made a final push to advance the Me 209 project with the construction and testing of the fourth prototype, designated Me 209H V-1, in June 1944. This iteration underwent several modifications, including enlarged wings and propulsion by a DB 603G engine. Unfortunately, the first prototype fell victim to an air raid on August 14, 1944, casting uncertainty over the fate of the remaining aircraft. Although there were intentions to export the Me 209A to Japan, these plans never materialized. It was also competing with the Ta 152H, which was easier to put into production while also having better performance, at least on paper.

Prototypes

  • Me 209A-0- First prototype powered by a  1,750 hp DB 603A-1 engine
  • Me 209A-1- Secon aircraft is essentially a copy of the first prototype 
  • Me 209A-2- Third tested with a new 1,750 Jumo 213E engine
  • Me 209H V-1 – The fourth prototype powered by a DB 603G engine  and received  larger wings

Conclusion 

The Me 209A project ultimately reached a dead end, not because it was a poorly designed aircraft, but simply because it didn’t offer significant enough improvements to justify production. The new Fw 109D, boasting similar flight performance, was already in the production phase. Introducing yet another new design without any notable advancements in this fighter category would have been illogical and a waste of already meager resources.

Me 209A-2 Specifications

Wingspans 10.95 m / 35  ft 11  in
Length 9.62 m / 31  ft 6 in
Height 3.65 m /  12 ft  2 in
Wing Area 17.15 m² /  184.53 ft²
Engine 1,750 hp Jumo 213E
Empty Weight 3,475kg / 7,662 lbs
Maximum Takeoff Weight 4,200 kg / 9,261 lbs
Maximum Speed 660 km/h / 410 mph
Cruising speed 490 km/h / 305 mph
Range 690 km / 430 miles
Maximum Service Ceiling 13,000 m  / 42,650 ft
Crew 1 pilot
Armament
  • None

Illustration

Credits

  • Written by Marko P.
  • Edited by Henry H.
  • Illustrations by Oussama Mohamed “Godzilla”

Source:

  • D. Nesić  (2008)  Naoružanje Drugog Svetsko Rata-Nemačka. Beograd.
  • D. Monday (2006) The Hamlyn Concise Guide To Axis Aircraft OF World War II, Bounty Books.
  • J. R. Smith and A. L. Kay (1972) German Aircraft of the WW2, Putnam
  • D. Myhra (2000) Messerschmitt Me 209V1, Schiffer Military History
  • B. C.Wheeler, German Fighters of WWII, Aeroplane Special
  • R. Jackson (2005) Infamous Aircraft, Pen and Sword
  • M. Griehl () X-planes German Luftwaffe prototypes 1930-1940, Frontline Book

 

Mitsubishi G4M1 Model 11 “Betty”

Empire of Japan (1941)

Multirole Medium Bomber: 1170 built

Ponderous looking, yet agile, the G4M1 proved to be among the most dangerous weapons in Japan’s Naval Arsenal for early years of WWII. (SDASM)

Designed as a replacement for the aging G3M ‘Nell’, as a long range bomber and torpedo attack aircraft, the G4M represented a comprehensive improvement. In this plane, the Imperial Japanese Navy found a high speed bomber capable of carrying out raids, and engaging enemy ships at sea at otherwise unheard of ranges. During the campaigns in China, and first year of war in the Pacific, the G4M wrought havoc on Allied forces on land and at sea. However, its range and speed were achieved in sacrificing crew and fuel protection, and as the tide of war turned, the same design philosophy that gave the G4M its lethal edge, would see the crews flying the aircraft endure staggering losses.

The Road to War

The Imperial Japanese Navy rose to rapid prominence in the late 19th to early 20th centuries, alongside the equally rapid pace of Japan’s industrialization. Its victory against the Qing during the first Sino Japanese war saw them claim Korea and lay the ground for future Imperialistic inroads into continental Asia. Against Russia in the Russo Japanese war, they shocked the world after demolishing two major fleets and seizing Port Arthur, this being the first time a European country had lost to a non-european industrial power. The rise of Japan’s naval strength was a necessity of its mission, accepted since it first began industrialization, to expand its economic sphere and gain access to the necessary resources which home islands lacked. Oil, rubber, and ore were the foremost of its material needs, but there was also a desire to prove the racial superiority of the Japanese over the people of Asia, and rise above the Europeans and Americans who dominated the region. In the long term, this set the stage for brutal wars of expansion, conducted using the most advanced weapons available, over distances that dwarfed nearly every military campaign that had since been conducted. However, to fight such wars, the newest weapons of war and methods of manufacture had to be sought out.

The United Kingdom would prove an ideal partner in this, and would prove to be a critical source for military aid and equipment, and an alliance began in 1902, lasting two decades. Britain’s aim in this agreement was to ensure that the Russian Empire would not become a challenge to them in Asia. Among the earliest and most visible boons of the alliance was the Battleship Mikasa, purchased from Britain, and serving as the Japanese flagship during the Russo Japanese war. Over the coming decades, the exchange would bring invaluable experience, and modern equipment to Japan. By the end of the First World War, Japan had grown considerably as a naval and industrial power, with an economy now dependent on agricultural imports from continental Asia, and oil from Borneo and America. Their European colonial challengers were also diminished in number, with Russia’s navy diminished even further during the revolution, and Germany losing its Pacific and Asiatic holdings, to Japan’s gain.

Naval planners thus looked to new opportunities and conquests. The greatest of these was China, by then descended into warlordism, but an economic power nonetheless. By the start of the twenties, the Washington Naval treaty would affirm the integrity of Chinese territory in spite of the conflict there, and assure equal economic rights for those wishing to trade. While the Japanese government would maintain these two principles for the rest of the 1920’s, the Navy itself was becoming more dominated by voices seeking to challenge the treaty and other agreements as being strictly tools of European and American naval dominance and interests. A faction led by Vice Admiral Kato Kanji would hold to a different principle, asserting that “the United States, by its limitless economic resources, by its pursuit of policies of economic aggression, and, in China in particular, by its provocation of anti-Japanese activities, threatens the Japanese position in China for which our nation has risked its destiny.”

While Japan had yet to experience the era of political turmoil, assassinations, and the subsequent rule by the military, the roots of the eventual conflict with the US were found in the years after the Great War. In accordance with the anti-treaty faction, the United States was selected as the chief ‘hypothetical enemy’ when the nation’s Imperial Defense Policy was revised in 1923. Doing so not only meant challenging a materially and technologically superior opponent, but also claiming much of Asia for itself as a matter of industrial, and racial, destiny.

Building an Arsenal

To face the United State and European powers, modernization was paramount. In aviation, the greatest step came with the post-WWI Sempill Mission. While Japan had a nascent aviation industry which had begun development during the Great War, nearly every plane in use was imported, and what was domestically produced was of foreign design. As part of the last major exchanges in the dying Anglo-Japanese alliance, the Japanese Navy requested assistance in the field of aviation from the British in 1920. While there were major disagreements within Britain on such a technology transfer, the hopes for major partnerships and sales with the British aviation industry overcame such doubts. The mission arrived the following year, led by former RAF officer Baron Sir Williams Frances-Forbes, who had brought with him experts in aircraft design, construction, training, and use. Materially, he brought airplanes of nearly every type from fighters to torpedo planes, numbering over a hundred in total. The mission at Kasumigaura would prove to be nothing less than a spectacular leap for Japanese military aviation, putting it well on the path to self sufficiency. Combined with the Royal Navy’s advice on the construction of the Japanese aircraft carrier Hosho, the first carrier built from the ground up for the role, Japan would now possess some of the most essential tools in the wars to come. Just as the technical assistance ended, so too did the alliance with Britain, which lapsed in 1923.

By the end of the 1920’s, the Japanese Navy was a world leader in new naval theories, especially aircraft carrier development. Here the carrier Akagi sports a triple deck arrangement, which was soon done away with. (wikimedia)

The airplane industry grew slowly, first as a series of small shops producing a modest number of mostly foreign planes, but growing into larger enterprises. The largest of these manufacturers were Mitsubishi, Nakajima, and Kawasaki, which provided the nucleus for the rest of the cottage industry based aviation sector. Arguably the largest of these was Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, through its branch, the Mitsubishi Internal Combustion Engine Co. at Kobe. Concurrent with the Sempill mission, the company’s aircraft manufacturing effort was shifted to Nagoya, which would remain the center for Mitsubishi’s airplane development and production. In the years to come, additional production plants would sprout from the main facilities in Nagoya, with separate airframe and engine departments being founded by 1935.

While the aviation industry was slowly rising, the primary means of war against the United States navy was to draw in, and then attack the enemy fleet once it was deep within Japanese territory. It was hoped that through this single decisive engagement that any war could be quickly be settled, and thus Japanese supremacy over Asia was assured. It wasn’t until far later that the US would heavily outnumber the Japanese fleet, and serious changes would need to be made to this strategy. The general approach to this disparity was two contradictory schools of thought. The first was to overmatch the enemy on the technical and operational level, most clearly demonstrated in the development of highly effective oxygen fueled torpedoes, outranging the enemy with superior long range gunnery, and the development of keen night-fighting training. Against this program was the belief that any material disparities could be overcome by the superior, unique qualities of the martial spirit of the Japanese soldier, whose supposed unwavering morale and willpower could deliver victory against a better equipped enemy.

This strategy was entirely battleship focused until the thirties, with aviation playing a very small role until several crucial technical developments were rolled out. Aircraft at the time had a very limited range of action, small payloads, and were very fragile. Even though the Japanese Navy had been among the first to use aircraft in combat in the First World War, the airplane was seen as a tool for local defense and reconnaissance. Torpedo aircraft were particularly promising, but in a naval doctrine that required striking out with overwhelming force at long ranges, wood and canvas biplanes simply were not up to the task.

It was the development of all-metal, streamlined, monoplanes that proved to be the deciding factor in shifting the idea of the airplane as a defensive weapon, to one which could deliver deadly blows from afar. As the striking range of aircraft increased, so too did the potential range of the ‘decisive battle’, which by the late 1930s was planned for around the Marianas. As these technical developments progressed, Japan would find itself evermore under the influence of the military, whose factions would launch a war against China. They would seize Manchuria in 1932, and planned larger campaigns deep into the Chinese heartland. Given the vast distances involved, the Imperial Japanese Army and Navy sought new bombers with unprecedented range to reach targets over a thousand nautical miles away.

Rikko

The war against China, and the predicted war with America, would require the use of aircraft in roles that were restricted by available plane’s very modest performance. Crucially for the Army and Navy, by the mid 30’s, light and medium bombers were growing ever more capable, and Japan’s aircraft carrier program was world class. At this time, Rear Admiral Yamamoto Isoroku, the chief of the technical bureau of the Naval Aviation Department, was pursuing a program to achieve technical independence from foreign manufacturers. However, he had not merely wished for autonomy in aviation, but was interested in developing several new, critical weapons.

Among the first of these was a long range, land-based attack aircraft or, Rikujo Kogeki-ki. At the direction of Vice Admiral Matusyama Shigeru, Rear Adm. Yamamoto and his team were directed to research the requirements for a long range bomber capable of engaging targets with bombs or torpedoes in support of the battlefleet. With their findings, they approached Mitsubishi with the requirements for a new aircraft. This materialized in the Mitsubishi G1M, a modern twin engine bomber and reconnaissance aircraft. The experimental plane first flew in 1934 and was to provide the basis for a new bomber design.

The G3M was a thoroughly modern bomber, if fragile. It served to prove the viability of the long range torpedo bomber. (sdasm)

The new Mitsubishi G3M was developed by head designer Honjo Kiro. Much like the G1M, it was a sleek, all metal, twin engine aircraft. It had a range of 1540 nautical miles and an 800kg payload, presenting a very impressive level of performance for 1935. Particularly impressive was its range, which was beyond any other bomber save for the nascent Boeing B-17 under development in the United States. Achieving this range was largely a factor of streamlining, and some very extreme weight saving techniques. This included foregoing any protection for the fuel tanks and crew. Fragility aside, the aircraft was almost exactly what the Navy was looking for, with Captain Onishi Takijiro, head of the Instruction division at Koku Hombu, expressing great satisfaction with the new plane when he inspected the Kisarazu Air Group in 1936, this being among the first of the new Naval land attack units.

The G3M would serve the Navy well in China, where it attacked distant targets, being defensive positions, and cities, in an attempt to prevent their fortification and cow the Chinese government into capitulating. The bomber was as the Navy wished, but they found that it was extremely vulnerable to enemy fighters, given its lack of armor and modest defensive armament. Despite the experiences in China, and the heavy losses incurred, the Navy was largely disinterested in the succeeding design possessing any greater protection than the G3M. Instead, they requested a twin engined design with a maximum speed of 215 knots at an altitude of 3 km, a range of 2600 nautical miles, and a combat range of 2000 nautical miles. They did not request any increase in payload size, but the overall design requirements were extreme. Given the G3M was already a streamlined design, which required major compromises to its protection in order to achieve its speed and range, producing an aircraft some 27 knots faster and capable of flying 460 nm further would prove extremely challenging.

The G3M wrought destruction across China, from the raids on Nanjing and Shanghai, to the sustained bombardment of the city of Chongqing. (SDASM)

There would be no competition for the design, as Mitsubishi received the development contract directly from the Navy in September of 1937. Honjo Kiro would again be called upon to lead the design effort, though he would be in the United States until October of that year. Finding the Navy’s requirements for the new plane bordering on unreasonable, Kiro would instead suggest a four engined design, feeling the requested pair of 1000 hp Mitsubishi Kinsei engines being inadequate. During early design proposals with Naval staff officers, he would attempt to introduce a four engined rikko, but was angrily rebuffed by Rear Admiral Misao Wada, the chairman of the congress. The admiral, nearly losing his temper, shouted “The navy will decide matters of operational need! Mitsubishi should just keep quiet and build a twin engined attack aeroplane in accordance with navy specifications! Erase the drawing of the four engined aeroplane on the blackboard at once!”

Honjo was thus forced to return to the twin engined concept, and was also given a new requirement that the aircraft feature a defensive 20mm cannon at its tail. The list of requirements now completely eliminated the possibility that the new design could be a derivative of the previous G3M. Heading the team on his return to Japan in April of 1938, Honjo oversaw the program, joined by Kushibe Shiro and Hikada Tetsuro. He had the benefit of wind tunnel research conducted the previous December, but would have the unenviable task of designing to the Navy’s unchanged requirements. The G4M materialized as a bomber with a wide, but streamlined fuselage, built in two halves to ease production. Such was the diameter of the fuselage that visiting German engineers from Heinkel were confused that the wide bulkhead they were inspecting was for a twin engined aircraft. The wings were built incorporating a massive integral fuel tank between the spars, with the surfaces of the wings representing the other walls of the container. These massive, but unprotected, stores contributed much to the aircraft’s enormous fuel capacity.

Much to the relief of Honjo, he was able to argue for more powerful engines, shelving the 1000hp Kinsei radials, for the new 1530hp Mitsubishi Kasei. Aside from this reprieve, the design of the aircraft was a fairly chaotic affair, as the engineers at Mitsubishi were being reshuffled between the G4M, and the A6M Type Zero fighter under development by Horikoshi Jiro’s team. The first prototype would be completed in September of 1939, and was transported from Nagoya to Kagamigahara for flight tests, as Mitsubishi lacked a company airfield at their factory. It was first flown by Mistubishi test pilot Kazuo Shima on October 23, the tests revealed some issues with handling, but the aircraft performed well. Military trials were conducted at Yokosuka in early 1940, where it was joined by the second prototype. Both aircraft impressed the Naval staff there, with the plane well exceeding the requirements placed on it, reaching a top speed of 240 knots and possessing a range of 3000 nautical miles.

The G4M prototype, here sporting a ventral gunner position. (warfarehistorynetwork)

Unfortunately for the design team, these impressive performance figures inspired the navy to request Mitsubishi develop the G4M as a heavy fighter. They wished to provide a long range escort to the G3M squadrons in China, which were without air cover on deep raids. There were also concerns that switching to the production of a new bomber would result in too steep a drop in G3M supplies, and reduce the complement of squadrons currently deployed. The new G6M ‘wingtip fighter’ featured a reduced fuel load and a pair of 20mm cannons in a ventral pod. In any case, the new weight distribution of the aircraft ruined the good handling of the G4M, and it simply didn’t have the performance needed. Some 30 planes were built and shelved to later be converted into transport aircraft.

Pre-production of the bomber proceeded only after the futile attempt at converting it to a heavy fighter. In December of 1940, it would officially be designated the Type 1 land attack bomber, for the Imperial year 2601. In service, the aircraft was typically referred to either G4M, or more casually as Hamaki, or cigar, in reference to the shape of its fuselage. Among Honjo’s team it bore the far less flattering nickname of namekuji, or slug.

The model accepted for service was some 520 kg heavier, and some 9 kts slower than the prototypes, after the typical design modifications were made. It too now only had a range of 2315 nautical miles once it was at a full combat load. This was, however, more than enough to satisfy the Navy. They began receiving growing numbers of the plane as pre-production began at Mitsubishi’s No.3 aircraft plant, with these 13 planes proceeding mass production. Apart from some minor leaks in the integral wing tanks, the bombers entered service without issue on April 2, 1941.

Debut in China

The next war with China escalated from a minor border dispute into one of the bloodiest wars ever waged. By 1940, the Japanese Imperial Army and Navy had pushed into the Chinese heartland, seized many of the largest and most important coastal cities, and had taken the capital of Nanjing, leaving it unrecognizable after an orgy of violence. The Nationalist Kuomintang government was, however, resolved to continue the war by whatever means. Despite Japan’s air superiority, the Chinese Air Force stayed mobile and well outside the range of Japanese fighters. They could vacate their airfields quickly and inflict heavy losses on Japan’s bombers which had been despatched against their airfields, flying great distances without fighter protection. It was with the introduction of the high performance G4M, and the extremely long ranged A6M fighter, that this strategy was to unravel.

The key feature of the G4M was its phenomenal range, achieved through its wide fuselage stores, and integral wing tanks. (rodswarbirds)

The first G4M’s to see combat were part of the Imperial Japanese Naval Air Service’s 11th Air Fleet, formed in January in 1941. This force was composed mostly of the old G3M, but had received 30 examples of the new model bomber in July. They were to continue the aerial bombardment of many Chinese cities, beginning with Chengtu, but were soon to attempt the further destruction of the Chinese air force. The A6M fighters that had made their debut the year prior had the range to pursue targets deep within China, but were unable to hold formation with the old G3M bombers without weaving, reducing their range, and left them unable to follow them at night. However, the new G4M had a cruising speed that the fighters could match.

These two aircraft were thus essential to operation O-Go, a gambit intended to cripple the Chinese air force in some three months. The raids were launched in the early morning well before sunrise, with the bombers acting as the navigational leaders for the fighters, which kept the formation with the bombers in single-file. The force would then arrive at sunrise, to give little warning, and allow the bombers to attack as many of the grounded planes as possible, with those who were able to get off the ground being attacked by the A6Ms. The first attack was carried out on August 11, against an airfield near Ichang. The Chinese’s air force SB-2 bombers had scrambled, leaving two unserviceable planes to be destroyed, and had sent up fighters to break up the attack. To their surprise, they found fighters guarding the formation, one far more advanced than their Soviet-made I-153 biplanes. The Japanese fighters, and the gunners of the G4M’s, would claim five victories against the defenders, suffering no casualties themselves.

The operation, however, would be canceled as tensions with America and Europe had risen to the point of conflict. O-Go was suspended, but had demonstrated the long range strike abilities of the IJNAF, and the shocking capability of its long range fighter escorts. Against the bases near Ichang, the raiders had flown 47 miles further than the distance from London to Berlin. Such a feat would not be replicated until P-51B was introduced with the US Army Air Forces, and flown deep into Germany some three years later. These distances also show the long range character of the war to be fought across the Pacific, and explains the otherwise seemingly unreasonable range requirements requested by the Navy.

Setting the Board

While the Japanese invasion of China had at first been decisive, and horrifically destructive in its opening phases, their lines of communication stretched on, and the Chinese Army was growing into a more dangerous opponent. Relations with other powers with major economic interests in China collapsed, spectacularly in the case of the United States, leading to the cancellation of the US-Japan Commercial treaty. The concerns of European powers were growing too, but far less so in the face of the German-Soviet invasion of Poland in August of 1939. Meanwhile in Japan, the Navy’s ambitions were again stoked, remembering their own territorial gains of the last major war between the European powers. The most vital of these potential spoils were oil fields of Borneo, held by the forces of the now occupied Netherlands. This would grant Japan energy independence from the US, against which they had been planning an inevitable war for over a decade.

Planning and theory, however, were swept aside when the US imposed a total trade embargo in August of 1941, with the UK and Netherlands following shortly after. Rather than be an incentive to pursue diplomatic means, it instead drove the hawks in Japan’s military-dominated government to at last embark on a conflict it had long been expecting. The Imperial Japanese Navy and Army thus began working on the arrangements in what would be a rapid series of offensives across the Pacific that would wreck the American Pacific fleet before it had a chance to be mobilized, seize the vital defensive perimeter of Malaya, and oil rich colonies of the Dutch.

The G4M1 was to be a decisive weapon across the Southern Asian theater. As the carrier was to the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Rikko was to the offensive which spanned from Malaya to Borneo. (aviocampo)

In regard to the land based Naval Air forces, their task would be to decimate enemy air forces before they had a chance to strike at the fleets and armies that would soon take and occupy vast swaths of South East Asia. Squadrons of G3M and G4M bombers were thus based at Formosa, to strike the American Army Airforce in the Philippines, and from what was formerly French Indochina, to assault the British forces in Malaya. Of chief importance were two targets, the Royal Navy battleship Prince of Whales and battlecruiser Repulse, which were enroute to Malaya, and the large contingent of American aircraft based in the Philippines. From the 26 of November to the 7th of December, the Japanese Navy embarked on a silent offensive, as its fleets crept toward their targets in Thailand, Malaya, Borneo, Guam, and Hawaii. Even before the war was declared, bombers were enroute to attack their targets as part of an offensive that dwarfed all others in regard to time and space.

Bombing of the Philippines

The attack force set against the Philippines was the 11th Air Fleet, which had at its disposal 81 G4M bombers and a number of the old G3M, along with a complement of 90 A6M fighters. Based in Formosa, their targets were the American Army Air Corps’ Nichols and Clark’s airfields. The American complement at these bases was considerable, numbering 35 of the new Boeing B-17 bombers, and 107 P-40 fighter aircraft, for a total of 227 aircraft, representing a very modern, and heavy strike force.

The G4Ms would however, not be the first to attack, with the air wing of the aircraft carrier Ryujo having hit positions in Mindanao, to the South, and the Army’s bombers, hitting Luzon, in the north. Thick fog had delayed the launching of the December 8th attack, and the Nichols airfield mission shifted to attack the airfield at Iba. Clark airfield remained a vital target, with two waves of G4M’s departing under the commands of Commander Suda Yushio and Lt. Commander Nonaka Taro. Commencing several hours after the Pearl Harbor attack, the commanders led the Takao and Kanoya Air Groups up to an altitude of 7000m with their A6M escorts, expecting a grueling fight to the targets ahead.

The Kanoya Air Group would prove to be among the oldest and well accomplished of the Rikko units, playing a crucial role across the Southern Asian front. (SDASM)

When news of the war broke out, the commander of the Far Eastern Air Force, Lt. General Lewis Brereton, attempted to launch an immediate attack against the Japanese forces in Formosa, using his in all likelihood, inadequate 35 B-17s. However, when he attempted to receive permission to launch the attack from the theater commander, General Douglas MacCarthur, he was instead held up by the General’s chief of staff, Maj. Gen. Sutherland. Unable to launch the attack, and uninterested in rebasing his bombers to a smaller airfield which he felt was unsuitable for his formation which was soon to receive further bombers, he instead kept his aircraft prepared for the attack, and sent out an early morning fighter patrol as cover.

By the time the Japanese strike force was well underway, Brereton’s fighters were turning back home to be refueled. Observers would spot the massive Japanese formation, but all attempts to warn Clark field failed, its only hope now was were its cover fighters from Del Carmen field. However, dust storms had kept all aircraft at Del Carmen grounded, and thus Commander Suda’s forces came upon a perfect target. With much of the US FEAF’s planes cleanly lined up around Clark field, the destruction was swift and overwhelming. Bombs smashed everything from the planes parked in ready positions, to airbases facilities, with the anti-aircraft batteries trying to hit the raiders using old and defective ammunition, the most recent of which was produced in 1932. Only four P-40’s were able to get airborne, and were soon lost, with the Japanese A6M fighters descending and attacking targets that had escaped the bombers. The Iba attack was equally one sided, and also claimed the only working American radar station in the Philippines. In all, both airfields were knocked out, the B-17’s were lost, and about 24 of the P-40’s were written off with many more damaged, representing a combat loss of two squadrons. The Japanese would only lose 7 planes, the only bomber lost to a landing accident on its return home.

The timing and breadth of the Southern Asian offensive seemed almost unimaginable before the war.  (campaigns of the pacific war)

The combined Japanese preparations, and the dysfunction of General MacCarthur’s command, had created a perfect storm that had largely annihilated the FEAF on the first day of the war. Even the staff of the Japanese Navy’s 11th Air fleet, Capt. Takahashi Chihaya believed, at the very least that, the B-17’s might have been rebased to the southern, and more defensible Del Monte airbase, which would have created serious challenges to the ongoing campaign to invade the Philippines. Few could have imagined the G4M’s strike could have been so decisive.

Force Z

While the FEAF was no longer mission capable, the next greatest threat in Southern Asia were the British garrison forces in Singapore, who were largely a responsibility of the Japanese Army, and Force Z, a pair of powerful warships dispatched weeks earlier to strengthen the British position after Japan had seized France’s Vietnamese colony. A battleship and battlecruiser, they represented a massive boost to British capabilities in the region, though the carrier support they were to receive was lost when HMS Indomitable ran aground and was laid up for repairs. Before the war had begun, these ships were merely intended to dissuade the Japanese from threatening Malaya and Singapore, as most of the Royal Navy was still tied down in Europe and the Atlantic. With the mission of deterrence gone on the morning of December 7th, the force’s commander, Admiral Tom Phillips, decided to take the most aggressive plan of action possible and attempt to thwart Japanese landing operations. Rather than choose to remain a fleet-in-being and attempt to shore up the defense of Singapore, or wait and attempt to merge with the joint Dutch-American naval forces, the Admiral gave the order to deploy his battleship, battlecruiser, and four destroyers into the sea of Siam.

The extreme range of the G4M1 allowed the IJN to strike at many targets once believed to be at a safe distance. Many western observers believed it to only have a range comparable to their own twin engine bombers. (sdasm)

It may seem foolish to have charged out without dedicated air cover, but until then, no heavy warship had ever been sunk by air attack, and he would have been out of range for nearly any other conventional torpedo bomber. The Royal Navy’s experience in Norway the previous year only reinforced this, as while German bombers had damaged several Allied cruisers, none had been lost. Beyond this, the airfield at Kota Bharu that would have supported him had been overrun by the rapid advance of the Japanese Army down the Malaysian peninsula. The Japanese Navy too had been landing marines down the coast, and when the Admiral received word at midnight December 9th that a landing force was unloading its forces at Kuantan, he set course to catch them at sunrise the next day.

As one of the Japanese Navy’s primary targets, Force Z was under considerable surveillance even before the war had begun. When they sortied on the 8th, Vice Admiral Osawa Jisaburo, the commander of the Southern Fleet, gave the Rikko units the mission to find and sink Force Z. Unable to pursue them the following day due to bad weather, the British fleet was spotted by submarine I-56 and its position was relayed to bombers. The next day, three Chutai comprising 88 planes of both the new G4M and the older G3M, launched at 06:44, to find and sink HMS Prince of Wales and Repulse. Most of the force carried torpedoes, with the 27 G3M’s carrying armor piercing bombs. Force Z was again discovered by a Genzan Air Group Rikko, and when they were joined by the bomb-laden Mihoro units, made the first attack on British warships. The attack began in a text book fashion, with a high altitude unit carrying out a level bomb attack while the torpedo aircraft made their attack runs in the confusion. 9 G3M’s dropped strings of bombs on the warships, scoring one hit, while 16 G4Ms carried out their torpedo attack. One bomb struck Repulse amidships, with the rest sending up torrents of water around the heavy warships in a shower of near misses. Some ten minutes later, the G4Ms carried out a multi-direction ‘hammer and anvil’ attack against HMS Prince of Whales, and despite the intensive evasive maneuvers, one torpedo struck the battleship on its port aft section. The explosion disabled its portside propellers and caused water to surge up the shaft into the portside engine space. With the battleship now flooding and navigationally impaired, the Japanese bombers departed, leaving the British warship in a poor state while the next attack wave assembled.

The G3M’s carried out level bombing attacks on the two warships, while the newer bombers carried out torpedo runs. The assault would comprise elements of the Kanoya, Genzan, and Mihoro Air Groups (Wikimedia)

With the position and course of Force Z relayed, the assembled formation now turned to engage them, with Lt. Cmdr. Shichiso Miyauchi as formation leader. Even with the information on the position and course of the British fleet, they were still hidden by low cloud cover. When they reached the reported position, Lt. Cmdr. Shichiso spotted a seaplane launched from the HMS Repulse and gave the order to descend through the clouds. The bombers found themselves 11 nautical miles away from the British force, HMS Prince of Wales showing a list.

The Lt. Cmdr. lead the first 9 plane Chutai against HMS Prince of Wales, which in response increased its speed to 28 knots, and began veering to starboard. The second and third divisions of this force were unaware of the damage the battleship had sustained, and set course to anticipate it making an evasive maneuver to port. When this never came, they broke off and went for HMS Repulse. This left Lt. Cmdr. Shichiso’s 3 plane unit to deal the finishing blow. He ordered the plane’s pilot and co-pilot to refrain from releasing the torpedo until they were within 500 meters of the target, then his plane and the number 3 aircraft, dropped their torpedoes, the second having lost sight of the target through heavy anti-aircraft fire. HMS Prince of Wales was struck on the starboard bow, and below the bridge. Now mortally wounded, most of the formation turned its attention to HMS Repulse.

Unlike the battleship, HMS Repulse was mostly undamaged, and taking extreme evasive maneuvers in an attempt to throw off the attack of six incoming torpedo bombers. Well trained against evasive targets, the Rikko approached from both sides and all but one plane launched their weapon was released, the battlecruiser taking a hit on its port side. The plane that was unable to make its attack then turned its attention to the HMS Prince of Wales and launched its torpedo, striking the battleship on its aft starboard side.

The second Chutai, under Lt. Higashi was next, dividing its attention between stricken British warships. They succeeded in striking HMS Prince of Wales again, though failing to hit Repulse, as it maneuvered through the spread of torpedoes launched against it. The last strikes came from Lt. Haruki Iki’s Chutai, and after an appraisal of the two damaged ships, decided that HMS Repulse was the more important target. Lt.Haruki’s plane led the attack from an altitude of 30m, nearly grazing the ship as he passed it. With both of his wingmen going down in flames from anti-aircraft fire, but their torpedoes launched, Lt. Haruki’s shotai scored three hits on Repulse, with the opposing side of the attack scoring one hit as well. The order to abandon Repulse was given at 12:30 with the ship quickly succumbing to flooding, this quick decision allowing several hundred men to escape the ship before it capsized. HMS Prince of Wales went down about an hour later, taking with it Captain John Leach, and Admiral Tom Phillips.

For the Japanese airmen, only four aircraft had been lost and they had proven a decisive lesson which all Navies were quick to learn, ships without air support were in mortal danger from aircraft. While theoretically, it had seemed possible a capital ship could be sunk from the air, this was the first time two such warships had been sunk in true combat conditions. Not only had the Rikko crews proven air power was now the deciding factor at sea, but in a strategic sense they had cleared the sea of Allied capital ships from India to Hawaii, and the IJN could land troops along the coast without fear of ambush.

Lt. Haruki’s two wingmen were the only aircraft losses with fatal results, with one G3M crash landing on its return to Vietnam, and four more planes needing a great deal of repairs. On his next flight over this area, the Lieutenant dropped two bouquets over the scene of the battle.

The Attack on USS Lexington

While the Rikko enjoyed great success in the early days of the war, one encounter would prove to be a sign of the difficulties to come. In the opening weeks of the New Guinea campaign, a task force centered around the fleet carrier USS Lexington was preparing to raid Rabaul, a newly captured Japanese Naval anchorage which would prove pivotal to the Japanese thrusts into New Guinea and the Solomon Islands. Detecting the force at long range, the 4th Air Groups was given the task of intercepting it on February tenth, 1942. 17 G4Ms were sortied in two groups against the task force, but without fighter escort, as the A6M units available lacked the necessary external fuel tanks needed for the mission. Led by Lt. Cdr. Ito Takuzo, they carried an armament of bombs. Detected, and set upon by Lexington’s fighters, several of the bombers were downed before having the chance to attack their target. The remaining aircraft of both units scored no hits.

The Lt. Cdr’s foiled attempt at Jibaku, or self destruction with the intent of dealing a blow to the enemy, his plane was struck by anti-aircraft fire as it neared USS Lexington. (WW2DB)

Lt. Cdr. Ito’s aircraft was badly damaged, one engine being entirely shot away by an American fighter. In their fatally damaged plane, the crew then attempted to try and fly into the USS Lexington. However, on the approach, their plane was riddled by anti-aircraft fire, and sent flying into the sea. In all, only two aircraft of the attack force were able to make it home, showing that unescorted attacks on ships with fighter cover were unlikely to succeed, and could only be made with extremely high casualties. Over succeeding campaigns, it would not be a lesson that would be taken to heart.

Battle for Port Moresby & The Bombing of Australia

While the IJN’s Fast Attack Force failed to eliminate the American Carriers in the Pacific, the loss of the American Battlefleet was a catastrophe, one that would allow the Japanese to advance swiftly through the central and southern Pacific. MacArthur would flee the Philippines, and Lt. General Arthur Percival would surrender Singapore, both after botched attempts at defending their territories. The Japanese Army and Navy would surge south, capturing rubber plantations, and the crucial Borneo oil fields. During this southern advance, the G4M would play a crucial role, in suppressing the RAF around Singapore, engaging American shipping around the Philippines, and harassing the joint American-British-Dutch-Australian cruiser force before its first, and only battle with the Japanese fleet.

With the vital resources of the Indies secured, the goal of the next phase was to build a defensive perimeter around the heart of this vast stretch of newly conquered territory. The next target was the anchorage of Port Moresby in Southern New Guinea, which if captured, would prove an excellent stronghold which directly threatened Australia. Before the carrier battle of the Coral Sea, G4M units were providing support to the amphibious landings in New Guinea. Lae and Salamaua were the first to fall in March, with the campaign continuing until the entire northern coast was held by the Japanese Navy. These operations would continue without challenge until the forces at Port Moresby were reinforced, first by a P-40 equipped squadron of the RAAF, and later by an American squadron flying P-39’s.

Against the defenders were the 4th and Tainan Air Groups.Their target was Port Moreseby itself, hoping to harass shipping and deplete the air strength of the defenders. The first major aerial engagement occurred on April 6th, where 7 G4M’s encountered five Allied fighters, surprisingly none were lost, though five returned with damage, and the loss of one crewmember. This encounter aside, the bomber units launched near daily raids against the Allied stronghold through May, even after the invasion force had been turned back after the Battle of the Coral Sea. After mid May, they sought to replenish their numbers, and returned to Port Moresby on June 16th, in support of an upcoming overland campaign by forces on the other side of the island.

Morale among the Rikko crews was exceptionally high after the initial victories across Southern Asia, remaining so until the Solomons. (rodswarbirds)

The loss of the four fleet carriers at Midway sent a shock through the entire Japanese war effort, and while it was not the fatal injury, or turning point, as it commonly seen, it forced a complete re-evaluation of how the war was being fought. In the shake up, many of the Rikko were redeployed, leaving the 4th and the Genzan Air Groups to continue the offensive at port Moresby. They would continue the bombing of Port Moresby, notably sinking the Australian transport ship Macdhui on the 18th of June. Air losses to enemy fighters were fairly light, as the bombers were given a considerable number of A6M fighters as escorts, and the night raiders met no meaningful resistance. Attrition was nonetheless an issue, as the Rikko were also tasked with the double duty of maritime patrols, which saw the men and machines of these units considerably overworked. While they had not demolished the Allied air forces in the region, the landing at Buna on the opposite side of the Island had succeeded, preparing the way for the Kokoda track campaign.

Concurrent with the operations to suppress Port Moresby were the raids on the city of Darwin, Australia, and its surrounding airfields. The first of these raids were unopposed, with the Takao Air Group flying over Western Australia in mid March. Their first encounter with enemy aircraft came on the 28th, during an unescorted raid by 7 G4Ms on the RAAF base at Darwin, which sent up a number of the American P-40E’s based there. They claimed one of the bombers, which returned the next day with nine A6M’s as escort, and bombed the airfield again without resistance. Hoping to keep up the pressure, the remaining aircraft of Takao Air Group returned from their mission in the Philippines, to the new base in Celebes. There they would launch the largest raid against Darwin on April 25th, with a force of 36 bombers and 15 fighters. This time however, the formation was met by a force of some 50 P-40’s, which claimed 6 bombers. In spite of these losses, they returned the next day with a strengthened 21 plane escort, seeing only the loss of one bomber. These raids saw a brief respite in May, before the Takao Air Group again made its appearance, bombing the city of Darwin with some 27 bombers on the 13th of June, suffering no losses. Having conducted the raid from a high altitude and with a large fighter escort, the P-40’s were unable to make the intercept. Losses remained low throughout the month, but given their position and strained resources, they switched to night bombing through the rest of the year.

Nocturnal nuisance raids remained the means of attack until March of the following year when the 753 Air Group launched a new series of daylight raids against Darwin. The first, launched on March 15, saw them target Darwin’s oil storage facilities with 19 G4Ms and 26 A6M’s. With the Australian air force having been substantially built up, the RAAF sent up a number of Spitfire Mk V’s. However, while they damaged some eight bombers, they suffered terrible casualties against the large escort force, and lost at least 14 of the new fighters. The IJN continued its assault on Darwin, focusing on its airbase, which had seen considerable build up. While they were generally successful against the RAAF bases at Darwin and Fenton, the slow accumulation of losses would see the last daylight raid flown on July 6th, 1943. The campaign was largely successful, as Darwin’s ability to host any significant naval forces was gone given its continued vulnerability to air attack, and the loss of its fuel stores.

Guadalcanal

With their homes now a warzone, these Papuan men became auxiliaries for the IJN (ww2incolor)

The loss of the fleet carriers Akagi, Kaga, Hiryu, and Soryu represented a grave loss for the Japanese Navy. However, it was not the decisive battle to end the war, as apart from the catastrophic loss of these ships and their airgroups, the IJN still possessed considerable offensive strength. The two most formidable IJN carriers remained, Shokaku and Zuikaku, and they were supplemented by the smaller fleet carriers Junyo and Hiyo, along with four light carriers.The IJN also retained its potent land based air arm. Against them were the American USS Enterprise, Saratoga, Hornet, and the smaller USS Wasp, along with a number of small escort carriers. While the United States could more than replace its losses the next year, if they suffered disastrous losses, like the one the Japanese Navy experienced at Midway, it could jeopardize Allied positions across the Pacific.

The area of greatest concern was the South Pacific, as while Port Moresby was still firmly in Allied hands, the Japanese Naval anchorage at Rabaul gave them control of the waters north of New Guinea. The Rabaul anchorage also proved a means of projecting force at the very edge of the Empire’s territory, which was soon to claim the otherwise unremarkable islands of Tulagi and Guadalcanal. In June, Japanese forces landed on these islands, and began the construction of an airfield on Guadalcanal. If completed, this outpost would give the Japanese Navy a powerful strategic position, allowing them to harass sea lines of communication from America to Australia. In a worst case scenario for the Allies, it could negate Australia as a position to build up forces for any major operation in the South Pacific. It would endanger the current operations to hold New Guinea, and force the main theater of the war from the Southern to central Pacific, where the Japanese Navy still held an advantage.

Before the completion of the airfield, the US Navy staged an amphibious assault with the First Marine Division going ashore on August 7th, with the support of a cruiser task force, the carriers USS Enterprise and Saratoga, and a screening force of sea planes for reconnaissance. This news came as a shock to the Japanese forces at Rabaul, with the first major response being a hastily assembled air raid of G4Ms of Rabaul’s 4th Air Groups. With such short notice, the Rikko were sent out with an armament of bombs, rather than switching to torpedoes before the 560 nautical mile flight. They flew out under the command of Lt. Egawa Renpei, a non-pilot officer, with 18 A6M fighters as escort, with one abort.

G4Ms of the Misawa Air Group (rodswarbirds)

The raiders were discovered first by coastwatchers, followed by USS Saratoga’s air search radar at 11:50. F4F wildcats from Enterprise and Saratoga were scrambled to meet them at 10,000ft. They met the bombers as they lined up on the cruiser task force, unaware of the presence of the American carriers. Under some disruption from the escorts, the Wildcats claimed two bombers outright, damaging another two which were lost to ditching. The raiders failed to claim any serious damage, and returned to Rabaul to prepare for an attack the following day. The 4th Air Group sortied 17 G4Ms under the command of Lt. Ikeda Hiromi, and were joined by a further 9 from the Misawa Air Group, for a torpedo attack on the American vessels at Guadalcanal. After several aborts, 23 planes flew to the target, joined by 15 A6M fighters.

With the American carriers having eluded Japanese reconnaissance efforts, the formation thus decided to attack the forces at the Guadalcanal beachhead. There they were met with a torrent of defensive fire from the task force’s cruisers and destroyers, and several wildcats from Saratoga and Enterprise. Only one torpedo found its mark in the destroyer USS Jarvis, and Lieutenant Junior Grade Takafumi Sasaki flew his fatally damaged bomber into the transport USS George F. Elliot, with the ensuing fire consuming much of the ship. In return, American forces would end up decimating the raiding force, which returned home with only five bombers and none of its officers, which would mark the highest losses for the entire campaign. Following the battle, the USS Jarvis would be found and sunk with all hands by patrolling G4Ms, and the George F. Elliot would be scuttled, its damage being too extensive to save the ship.

The Rikko pilots carried out attacks at extremely low altitudes, though often only the best of them would carry out the attack until the last possible moment. (WW2DBase)

The failure of the raid can be placed on the improved air defenses of American vessels, now mounting a considerable number of the 40mm Bofors guns capable of throwing out an enormous volume of fire, the presence of American fighter planes flown by aviators who had learned to fight the Zero, and also the decline of expertise of Japanese aircrews. One officer aboard the USS Astoria remarked that the Rikko of the 4th and Misawa air groups lacked the tenacity he’d seen in early battles, stating, “I’ve never seen them that bad before. Those crack Jap Navy pilots, the ones we tangled with in the Coral Sea, and at Midway–they don’t let up. Never. They come right at you, and they keep on coming until you get them or they get you. These punks–running away…”

While they had not faced the losses like the carrier based forces at Midway, casualty rates had been steady across the Southern Asian and Australian front, and the overly selective pilot training programs were now forcing these schools to rush students through to the Navy to try and meet demand. Pilots that went down in Rikko were also difficult to recover in the best cases, as their missions often took them to the limits of their own territory. In the case of the raid on October 8, 1942, those pilots who did survive took their own lives when the US Navy attempted to recover them. In the weeks to follow, many Rikko crews would refuse to bring parachutes, choosing to die, rather than bail out over enemy territory.

The day after the disastrous raid, a Japanese cruiser force would reach Guadalcanal, and in a night raid, destroy all but one of the American cruisers, and force the retreat of the amphibious forces, which had not had enough time to unload their cargo. The battle for Guadalcanal thus began in earnest, with the remote island being held by the First Marine Division against the Japanese 17th Army under Lt. Gen. Hyakutake Harukichi. Both sides were isolated on Guadalcanal, as the Japanese stronghold of Rabaul was nearly as distant as the American base at New Hebrides. The environment would prove dangerous, with malaria, dysentery, and dengue fever capable of sapping the strength of entire units, and the supply situation being so poor that some Japanese soldiers would begin calling Guadalcanal “Starvation Island”.

The Rikko would prove one of the only means of putting pressure on the now completed American airfield on the island, named Henderson for a pilot who had died at Midway. The naval air forces at Rabaul were also built up with the addition of the Kisarazu Air Group. Over the next few weeks, the assembled bombers would strike out at Henderson, with the first major raid comprising 23 planes against the airfield on August 25, suffering no losses of their own, as the American fighters were being used for ground support missions and were being rearmed when the bombers arrived. The next day, the Rikko returned with a strength of 16 planes under the command of Lt. Nakamura. Though suffering the total loss of two bombers, and two forced landings, the attack dealt a painful setback to the fledgling ‘Cactus Air Force’ at Henderson, as the bombers had torched 2000 gallons of avgas, and secondary munitions explosions damaged a number of planes. While they had escorts during these missions, the A6M’s had severe radio trouble due to their sets operating too close to the frequency of the faint radio emissions from their engine’s spark plugs. The fighter pilots typically opted to remove the troublesome sets to increase the range of their planes, but their situational awareness suffered accordingly.

 

The sheer size of the Solomon theater put the A6M’s endurance to the test. Most of the Rabaul Zeros had their radio sets removed due to onboard interference, and to further lighten the aircraft. Note the absence of the antenna aft of the cockpit (ww2db)

The raids would continue on a near daily basis, apart from a diversion to chase shipping around the area. For the most part, Guadalcanal was isolated, save for fast transports and deliveries by air. The Rikko claimed one of these transports on August 30th, sinking the USS Colhoun with a pattern of bombs. Heavy raids continued into September to support the Army on the Island, which would attempt to overrun the American positions in a night assault on the night of September 13-14. Defeated, the Imperial General Headquarters would reiterate that Guadalcanal was to be captured at any cost and placed more resources towards reclaiming the island. For the Rikko, this came in the form of two more Air Groups, the Kanoya and Takao, which had both arrived by the 23rd. This allowed them to rotate out the exhausted units at Rabaul, and continue the assault on Henderson.

Henderson however, had also seen some improvements. The Cactus Air Force was reinforced by USS Saratoga’s fighter squadrons while their carrier was sent away for repairs following an attack by Japanese Submarine I-26. They also had a new SCR 270 air search radar, set up in early September. They thus had a considerable number of Wildcats, and the ability to scramble them in time to the 8 km altitude the G4M’s flew. However, the radar system wasn’t perfect and could prove sensitive to the conditions on the ground. Sustained losses among the Rabaul’s squadrons grew considerably compared to earlier efforts. Naturally, daylight raids became less frequent, though they were still occasionally conducted and would inflict serious damage. On October 11th, a Japanese raiding force of 45 G4Ms under the command of Lt. Cdr. Nishioka Kazuo, departed to Henderson amidst poor weather. Several aircraft fell out due to the weather, but the remaining aircraft split into two units. As the first unit had completed its attack, the second made its way to Henderson and caught a dozen wildcats on the ground. They would return on the 13th, with Lt Makino Shigeji leading a 25 bomber raid on Henderson, this time failing to be intercepted due to weather obscuring the coast watchers. His force would set fire to a fuel depot, and destroy a B-17 on the ground.

The Kanoya Air Group was committed to the battle for Guadalcanal, during this deployment its fighter and bomber groups were divided, with the G4M1 units forming the 751st Air Group. (sdasm)

Night raids had begun in late August, and proceeded almost without end for a month. These were typically a single aircraft tasked with dropping a string of bombs on Henderson, with the intention of being disruptive, more than dangerous. As the conditions of the planes worsened, their engines began to grow desynchronized, leading to the aircraft making a terrible noise, earning these raiders the nickname ‘Washing Machine Charlie’. Contrary to popular myth, this sound was not intentionally created by mechanics tampering with the aircraft, the planes were simply badly worn out.

Fatigue, both of the air crews, and their equipment, resulted in the Rikko units being stood down for a time. Even with the reinforcements they had received, they had been pulling the quadruple duties of maritime patrol, anti-shipping, high altitude bombing, and night raider. From Rabaul to Henderson was about 565 nautical miles, which made for a flight time of about 6 hours. Near daily activity had rendered these units almost unserviceable.

The last major naval strike since the initial raid on the Guadalcanal came on November 12. Having detected a convoy of American ships, 19 G4Ms were sortied under the command of Lt. Cdr. Nakamura Tomo-o, who had an escort of 30 A6Ms. Led by Rear Adm. Daniel J. Callaghan, aboard the heavy cruiser San Francisco, Task Group 67.4 was primarily concerned with the presence of Japanese battleships in the area, but the air search radar on Guadalcanal informed them of an impending Japanese air attack. Detecting the force from over 100 miles away, they were able to vector a number of Cactus Air Force F4F and P-39 fighters to cover the formation.

Lt. Cdr. Nakamura brought in his formation just below the cloud cover, and after dividing his force into two units, sent them in after the American ships. As they did so, 16 American fighters rushed to intercept them. Keeping to almost wavetop height, the Rikko would attempt to press the attack while under heavy fire from the assembled American warships, and the enemy fighters which chased them frantically just over the sea. One unidentified F4F pilot went as far as resorting to ramming one of the bombers after his ammunition was expended.

Unlike the aviators that struck Repulse and Prince of Whales, many of the less experienced airmen were shaken by the volume of fire, and broke off their attacks as they closed in. None of the torpedoes hit their mark, but the pilot of one fatally damaged bomber chose to fly his plane into the USS San Francisco, rather than attempt to ditch on Guadalcanal. Anonymously, he flew his plane into the cruiser’s mainmast, the wreckage swinging over after impact, its pulverized engine and wing spilling burning avgas across the ship. The flames had spilled into the main battery director, and wrought havoc across the aft decks. In the end the fires were brought under control, but not before 22 lives were lost and further 22 were seriously injured.

USS San Francisco survived the air attack and played a crucial role in the first night of the Naval Battle of Guadalcanal the evening after the plane attack. It also suffered a good deal of friendly fire from another American cruiser. (USN)

Despite the Japanese aircrew having discarded their parachutes, committing themselves to death before capture over enemy territory, a number of survivors emerged from the wreckage of the low level planes. As boats were sent out to recover them, a bewildering series of encounters awaited them. One gunner aboard a floating wreck began firing on a nearby US destroyer in a very short encounter, an enraged petty officer aboard the USS Barton ignored the orders of his skipper and gunned down a dazed pilot climbing from a wreck, and one rescue team attempted to bring aboard a young airman, only to be prevented by his superior who shot him before turning the gun on himself. Of the 19 planes that were sent on the raid, only two returned to Rabaul in working order, two crews crash landed on Guadalcanal and later returned, and three others ditched in friendly territory. In all, 10 of the 19 crews were lost outright in one of the harshest engagements the campaign had seen. This all but decimated Rabaul’s attack force, leaving 3 of its 4 air groups in tatters.

Solomons

The greatest advantage of the G4M1 lay in its incredible range, but the sheer distance from Rabaul to the Southern Solomons proved grueling for near daily operation. (Dennis Burns)

The attempts to take the island of Guadalcanal failed, with the last major land battle occurring in late October, 1942. The now wearied Japanese Army clung to the South Western corner of the Island, where destroyers acting as fast transports left oil drums full of supplies, and brought in a trickle of reinforcements. At sea, the Japanese Navy had begun the campaign with a stunning victory off Savo Island, but in the months following, had lost the battleships Hiei and Kirishima in gun battles off the coast of Guadalcanal. Yet, they had managed to sink the American carriers, Hornet, Wasp, and critically damaged Enterprise, leaving Saratoga as the only American fleet carrier in the Pacific for some time. In return, they suffered the loss of the light carrier Ryujo, and the fleet carrier Shokaku had been seriously damaged, worse though, was the loss of experienced aircrews which the Navy’s training programs were struggling to replace. These victories would not be enough without Guadalcanal, the capture of which could have proven a decisive blow against the supply lines and, crucially, morale of American forces in the Pacific.

The Imperial Army Headquarters would finally admit the loss of Gudalcanal several weeks after the end of any serious engagements on the island, on December 31, 1942. The next year would see the American forces march further north in the Solomons, where they had once only had a foot hold. For the most part, the heaviest forces on both sides were spent, and USS Saratoga was too valuable to lose. It thus fell on the cruiser and destroyer forces to continue the battle for the Solomons. For the Japanese Navy, which had suffered the loss of a number of its heavier warships, it was hoped that the Rikko could partially take up their offensive ability.

During this time, raids to support the Army in New Guinea, to inflict losses on the Allied air base at Milne Bay, and nightly nuisance raids across the theater were carried out. Major daylight raids became very rare following last year’s losses, though this isn’t to say none achieved major success. One 23 bomber raid on January 17th destroyed numerous aircraft on the ground at Milne Bay, with no losses sustained. Regardless, some tactics were sworn off as far too costly, namely daylight torpedo attack missions. The combination of improved anti-air armaments on American ships, the slow, level approach of attacking planes, and the ever more present threat of fighters, thanks to early warning radar, made daylight attacks a costly, futile affair.

A switch to night attacks brought dangers of its own, but given the high level of blind flying ability of the more veteran Rikko crews, it was far from suicidal. They would soon prove their abilities on the night of 29/30 January, after a sizable force of American warships was spotted near Rennell Island. The force in question was a task force consisting of the heavy cruisers USS Wichita, USS Louisville, and USS Chicago, the only surviving cruiser of the ill fated battle of Savo Island at the beginning of the Guadalcanal campaign. They were joined by two escort carriers, three light cruisers, and six destroyers. However, the green commander of the force Rear Adm. Robert Giffen had steamed ahead of his slower escort carriers in order to make a timely rendezvous with a number of destroyers, before reaching Guadalcanal.

Lt. Cdr. Nakamura commanded the G4M’s sorties against this fleet, comprising a mostly veteran force from the 705th Air Group, and was joined by 15 older G3M bombers from the 701st. Departing before dusk, Nakamura led the formation against TF 18. The bombers of the 705th made their attack at 19:19 hours, in dim light. The G4Ms made their attack free of interruption from enemy aircraft, but failed to score any hits. They had lost only one aircraft in the attack, which was remarkable as this battle marked one of the first uses of radar fused, proximity shells aboard American warships. At 19:38, the second force, composed of the older G3M bombers undertook their attack in darkness, with a spotter aircraft dropping a string of flares over the American fleet. The string of flares was dropped in the heading of the force, colored coded to denote the types of ships. Against the light of the flares, the 701’s planes went in. USS Chicago found itself in the sights of Lt. Cdr. Higai Joji’s flight, and after downing one of his ‘Nells’ on a torpedo run, the burning, floating wreck of the bomber now illuminated the cruiser.

USS Chicago found itself at the center of the enemy attack, with the oncoming bombers scoring two hits, one hitting the after engine space and disabling three of its four propeller shafts and flooding its turbogenerators, and another striking the forward engine room destroying the remaining active shaft, leaving the cruiser dead in the water. Swift damage control efforts set flooding boundaries and allowed the crew to save the ship for the time being. For the heavily damaged cruiser, two of Lt. Cdr. Higai’s aircrews were lost, including the veteran commander himself. However, the engagement was not yet over, as Rikko were now aware of the survival of the stricken cruiser and sought to finish it.

The task of sinking the USS Chicago lay with the 751 Air Group, a unit now composed mostly of new crews, who lacked the skills needed for the night attack the evening before. Nonetheless, they sortied 11 G4M’s under the command of Lt. Cdr. Nishioka. They found the USS Chicago under tow by the fleet tug USS Najavo at 16:10. Under escort from the other warships and F4F’s from VF-10, two of the bombers were lost before the run. However, the remaining aircraft pressed the attack and put four more torpedoes into the cruiser, with the four surviving bombers departing at as best a speed as they could make. Surveying the damage, it was immediately clear that the Chicago could not be saved, and the Navajo was ordered to cut its line. Some 20 minutes after the attack, the cruiser capsized, with the attacks having claimed 62 men. The destroyer USS La Vallette was also hit, though damage control efforts saved the ship, then taken in tow by the then available USS Navajo.

Through 1943 the fragility of the G4M1 became ever more apparent, but with no replacement in sight, and the desperation of the Navy’s position in the South Pacific, it remained an essential tool against the Allies.(SDASM)

While the battle of Rennell island again demonstrated the lethality of the Rikko, it was again another sign that daylight usage of the aircraft could not be continued without significant losses. It was also indicative of a growing problem that had now reached a tipping point, one that was being felt across all of Japan’s air forces. A vast gap in ability between the fresh and veteran aircrews was not only being felt in the capability of their units, but was forcing restrictions on mission planning. The inability for new crews to even perform the same tasks as the veterans in theater would not only prevent them from embarking on the same missions together, but would leave them relegated to more dangerous missions, unable to fly under the cover of darkness.

I-Go and the Death of the Admiral

Wishing to avoid an entirely defensive campaign, Adm. Yamamoto would commit his South Eastern forces to an offensive to shore up the position of Rabaul, and its defensive circle from Bougainville to New Guinea. In this offensive, carrier air groups were based alongside their ground based counterparts for attacks on enemy shipping and air bases through the region. The Rikko, with new replacements, were to take a center role in the offensive and resumed raids against Port Moresby. Despite only modest damage being inflicted across the theater, the operation was judged a success.

Admiral Yamamoto Isoroku salutes gathered airmen at Rabaul, shortly after this meeting he would board a G4M1 bomber to survey his forces on a nearby island. (Wikimedia)

It was to be entirely overshadowed by what was supposed to be a typical inspection of frontline positions. Adm. Yamamoto and members of his staff boarded a pair of G4M’s to view their positions on Balalle from the air. Not expecting to encounter any enemy forces, the pair of bombers flew to the island with a modest escort of six A6M fighters. Unbeknownst to them, American code breaking efforts had succeeded in discerning the Admiral’s plans, and 18 P-38G fighters were in route. Coming upon the flight, they ignored the fighters and went straight for the bombers before withdrawing. Overwhelmed, the escorts brought down only one of P-38’s that day, with both G4M’s being shot down.

Veteran pilot FPO1/c Tanimura Hiroaki was able to bring the second plane to the beach below in one piece, saving the lives of his crew, Vice Adm. Ugaki Matome, and Yamamoto’ chief of staff. However, the first aircraft was riddled with bullets and went down out of control, with the Admiral being struck with gunfire at the start of the attack.

The Admiral’s wrecked aircraft after its descent into the jungle. (warhistoryonline)

The loss of Yamamoto was not the blow as it has often been remarked, indeed, he was a keen strategist, but one that had made his fare share of mistakes. His talents could never have been relied upon to salvage the then rapidly deteriorating Japanese position across the Pacific. However, the lack of a central figure with his prestige meant that the war would be directed by officers that often did not fight the war according to a single, realistic plan. The Admiral’s passing was a key point in the war, marking the definitive end of the period where a strategy was pursued with clear aims that might bring the Allies to the negotiating table. It was a purely attritional battle now, one that they were not prepared to fight, and with no plan beyond hoping to outlast their enemies.

Clinging On

With the loss of Admiral Yamamoto and the retreat from Guadalcanal, the Japanese Navy was now on the backfoot. It still possessed a number of carriers, but the quality of their aircrews had declined considerably, and the American carrier force was being introduced to the new Essex class, along with the excellent new F6F fighter. These new carriers were arguably the most capable of any class produced during the war, with 7 being commissioned in 1943 alone, a figure larger than America’s entire complement of pre-war fleet carriers.

Rather than assault the stronghold of Rabaul directly, American and Australian forces moved to cut them off to the West and South. (campaigns of the pacific war)

Despite the losses borne earlier in the year, new Rikko units were deployed to bases in New Guinea and the Solomon islands, with training programs rushing to help cope with a now permanent shortage in personnel. By mid 1943, they were typically being used only for maritime patrol missions, with the Allied air presence across New Guinea and the Solomons having been considerably strengthened. Aided by the introduction of new models of fighters in the theater, like the F4U-1 Corsair, the P-40F, and P-38G, they were now ever more confident in their control of the air. They were thus able to deal serious blows to Japanese raiding forces, and were able to cover their own raiders with the long range P-38. Extremely high losses among the Japanese Naval Aviators had also seen a shift in strength across the theater that now saw the Army Air Force shouldering the majority of effort in the theater.

As the American forces climbed ever northward in the Solomon Islands, the Rikko were again called upon to help shut down their advance. Near the end of June, a major amphibious landing was threatening forces around New Georgia, and 26 G4Ms under the command of Lt. Cdr. Nakamura Genzo were sortied to attack the assembled task force. They located the fleet between Rendova and New Georgia, and found it covered by F4F and F4U fighters. Regardless, they pressed their attack with 10 bombers making their way to the fleet. They would succeed in putting one torpedo into the transport USS McCawley. It exploded in the engine room, killing 15 and cutting power to the ship, which would remain afloat until being mistakenly torpedoed by friendly PT boats later that evening. Casualties among the Rikko were again exceedingly high, with 19 planes being lost.

The American advance to New Georgia, and soon Vella La Vella, would enable them to base aircraft in a far more northern position in the Solomons. This directly threatened the Japanese air bases, Army and Navy, on the Southern and Northern ends of Bougainville, the largest and northernmost island in the Solomons. The Rikko were directed to support ground operations, bombing enemy field positions in daylight raids, and despite the considerable presence of their own fighters, casualties soon became too heavy, and after a raid on the 15th of July, were called off.

Recuperation lasted as long as September, when Allied landings along Northern New Guinea threatened the important air base at Lae, which covered oversea communication with New Guinea and the stronghold of Rabaul. The Rikko were sent to raid shipping in the area to stifle the invasion, but through the month achieved little damage. Their tactics were largely switched to anti-ship level bombing, which saw significantly lower casualties but little success, until the end of the month when desperation forced them to launch a daylight torpedo attack. Of the 8 planes sent to attack the landing forces at Finschhafen, only one returned to base with another aircraft ditching, with no hits being reported to any allied ships.

The encirclement of Rabaul had begun in earnest and it would suffer a major air raid on November 3rd, and in retaliation, Admiral Koga Mineichi would order an anti-shipping operation that would include a deployment of carrier air groups to aid their strained land-based counterparts. The Rikko would begin the offensive with a night attack on US shipping around Bougainville on November 8th. A composite flight of G4Ms from the 702nd and 751st Air Groups were committed to a night attack against the forces that had recently landed American forces on Bougainville. They would be joined by carrier based bombers in the attack, and succeeded in torpedoing the light cruiser USS Birmingham, smashing a 30 foot hole in its hull, aft of its chain locker. Regardless of a near miss from a dive bomber, a torpedo strike, and a second bomb which struck turret no. 4, Birmingham’s crew raced to stop the flooding and succeeded miraculously. In spite of the beating, the cruiser could still make a speed of 30 kts, allowing them to keep up with the rest of the formation, and avoiding the fate of the USS Chicago. Only two crewmen were killed in the attack, though many more were injured.

By 1943 the A6M was growing increasingly obsolescent. Designed around a light, low power engine, it had limited capacity for improvement. Against new American models, some exceeding 2000hp, it was at a decided disadvantage. (SDASM)

In spite of the cover of darkness, losses among the Japanese forces were high, with 7 G4Ms being lost. Much improved gunnery from the American ships was showing that advancements in radar direction, proximity fusing, and training, enabled them to match the feats of the night torpedo bombers. At 19:58 hours, USS Birmingham used its 5 inch gun battery to down a single G4M engaged in illuminating the task force at a range of 14,000 yards. Worse for the Rikko was that while some of the new crews were proficient enough in low light flying for night attacks, they could still find themselves overwhelmed when committing to the final run of the attack.

Rikko sorties continued the following days, with fewer losses, but also marginal success. On the night of November 12/13, the Rikko attacked Task Force 39 in 04:53 in the early morning. Three G4Ms were able to box-in the light cruiser USS Denver in a hammer and anvil attack, scoring a hit. Struck along the starboard aft engine room, Denver quickly lost propulsion and took on a 15 degree list. As damage control efforts continued, the cruiser was brought under fighter protection at six in the morning, and was able to retreat to safety. Two of the three Rikko that attacked the cruiser were shot down, with the successful strike being made by Lt(jg) Maruyama Hidezumi, whose plane returned home with 380 holes in it.

Another major attack was launched on the night of 16/17. During this sortie, SFPO Kobayashi Gintaro would succeed in torpedoing the USS McKean, a destroyer being employed as a high speed troop transport. When attempts to evade the torpedo failed, it struck starboard, aft of the rear magazine, which caused an explosion that cast burning fuel oil across much of the ship and the water around it. Sinking at the stern, the order to abandon ship was called well before the explosion of the ship’s magazines. Sixty four sailors lost their lives, along with a further 52 marines, with the survivors picked up by the other destroyers of the force.

These attacks imposed some losses against the forces invading Bougainville, but they were unable to stop the northern stream of American forces that were soon to capture the southern flank of Rabaul. Regardless of the extreme overclaiming of the Rikko crew, they were unable to deal significant damage to the amphibious forces, and were themselves taking serious losses in operations, which earlier that year, had guaranteed a good deal of safety. Eventually, the forces in Rabaul would be encircled and subjected to attack from attacks from the South and the West, before American carrier forces returned to the region in strength to deal an even greater blow. During this period, only the Rikko of the 751st remained in theater, but after a massive air raid in February of 1944, the remaining forces withdrew.

The Retreat

While 1943 lacked the intensive surface battles of the previous year, and saw no new major aircraft carrier engagements, it represented a string of serioust defeats for the Japanese Army and Navy. By year’s end, they had completely lost the ability to threaten the sea lines of communication from Australia to America, and thus any major strategic position that could threaten the ability of the Allies to continue the war in the South Pacific. Worse, they were now fighting a lost battle to retain control of Rabaul, with New Guinea being remarked as a hell on Earth from which men did not return, and their positions in the Gilbert and Marshall Islands now being reduced to the outposts of Kwajalein, Enwitok, and Truk. The central pacific strategy was also non-viable, as the American carrier forces had been more than rebuilt, and had a year to build up their air groups, now flying the F6F fighter as the fleet’s standard, which was now more than a match for the A6M. Even moresow, now that Japan’s veteran naval airmen were either lost, or rotated out. This would leave all remaining air-fleet engagements extremely one sided.

The Rikko played a minor role in defending the Gilberts and Marshalls, apart from the base at Truk. At the beginning of 1944, this anchorage would find itself under attack numerous times by American carrier forces. The greatest blow came on February 17th and 18th, when it came under major air attack. Under siege from five American fleet carriers, the operation would thoroughly wreck the Japanese Navy’s air presence in the region, and prove that the anchorage was too vulnerable for any major use in the future. While there was largely very little the forces in the region could do against the American forces, one G4M flying from Tinian would make a solo night attack against the fleet carrier Intrepid.

This single plane managed to evade attention and make its attack against the carrier. The torpedo exploded 15 feet below the waterline, causing flooding, and jamming its rudder to port. Navigationally impaired, the crew had to fashion a sail to steer the ship back to Pearl Harbor for several months of repairs.

Now well established, the Allies conducted raids across New Guinea and the Solomons. Here an A-20G attacks grounded aircraft at Lae 1943. (ww2db)

Future attacks would take this form, as these night missions were less likely to be detected, and the pool of aviators who could actually carry out these attacks remained small. In the early months of 1944, the Rikko continued to make these attacks in piecemeal throughout the Pacific in response to the ever growing offensive on the part of the American Navy. The naval bombers also made their attacks in response to major landing efforts at Biak and Palau, while also making opportunistic bombing raids, such as one on June 5th against the airfield at Wakde island. There, a pair of G4Ms of the 753rd Airgroup destroyed six aircraft and damaged 80 more at the crowded air base, with a follow up attack hitting the base with three bombers on the 8th. However, for the most part, the effectiveness of most of these operations were indeterminate, as the scale of their operations diminished.

They also found themselves fighting more determined resistance in the air at night, as the USAAF and the Navy had advanced their own night fighter programs. Over Guadalcanal, the USAAF would first employ the P-70, a thoroughly disappointing conversion of the A-20 attack plane into the night fighter role. It had neither the speed, nor service ceiling, to catch a G4M at the 7km they typically flew during their nuisance raids over Henderson, and only one or two kills were made with this model over the course of the war. Frustrated with the P-70, Henderson resorted to using searchlight guided P-38G’s, and even modified some aircraft to carry an air search radar in a modified fuel tank. The pilot workload of the P-38G was already considered burdensome by many pilots, and the new device only worsened the situation. Greater success was found with the Marine’s converted Lockheed Ventura night fighters in the convoy defense role, but it wasn’t until the deployment of the P-61 in late 1943 that the G4Ms could effectively be pursued at night. Several dozen victory credits were tallied on the P-61, with two of the six aces made on the model being in the Pacific theater.

The US Navy’s solution to night torpedo attacks came in a more convenient form, as radar equipped models of existing carrier fighters. These were initially F6F-3N Hellcats, which placed an air search radar on the wing, which they would use in the final approach to the target after being vectored in by a supporting ship. Later models would become available, with more powerful engines, and a pair of 20mm cannons supplementing their .50 caliber guns. Marine and Naval aviators would shoot down considerably more aircraft than their land based counterparts, though fewer of them were G4Ms, with the majority being light patrol aircraft being used to track American warships at night. As was the case with American improvements in radar directed gunnery, the presence of these advanced night fighters made the Rikko’s night attack missions considerably more dangerous.

Replacement

The G4M1 Model 11 had served well past its prime, and was relieved by the improved G4M2 Model 22. The new model had Kasei Model 21 engines, which were rated at 1850 hp, with water injection. It had a new wing incorporating laminar flow research, increasing its size and fuel capacity, without increasing drag. However, it did not receive additional protection to its fuel tanks, nor did it implement anything more than token protection for its crew. Its defensiveness was somewhat improved by the installation of an additional 20mm machine gun in a powered dorsal turret, replacing the top 7.7mm machine gun mount. Later models carried the Type 3 Ku Mark 6 search radar, to allow for better target acquisition on night torpedo raids.

The G4M2 is easily distinguished by its elliptical vertical stabilizer tip, the expanded nose glazing, and powered turret, which isn’t visible from this angle. (ww2db)

The old G4M1 machines were considered old and outdated, both by Americans, and the Japanese Navy itself. The airframe itself was also somewhat dated, but better engines had improved its performance, and it was being supplemented by a lighter twin engine torpedo bomber, the P1Y Ginga, or Galaxy. Nevertheless, the Japanese position in the war was irrecoverable. The Japanese assembled carrier forces would be decimated by the loss of so many airmen in the battle of the Philippine sea, and leave the navy without a coherent strategy. The battle for the Philippines would be fought without a strategy that could even hope to bring victory. Even in the planning stage, it was evident that the remaining Japanese Naval forces could not hope to prevent an American amphibious operation in the Philippines, and they would only arrive well after the invasion force had disembarked all of its forces and cargo. With no hope of actually preventing the invasion, or claiming a victory of any strategic importance, the remainder of Japan’s Naval strength was sacrificed at Leyte Gulf.

1945 was a bleak year that saw the near collapse of Japanese society. In this last year of the war, a new model G4M3 was produced, in order to serve as a host aircraft for a rocket propelled kamikaze aircraft. It reflected the futile stubbornness of those who lead the country, with the military unwilling to terminate the war until it faced a near total blockade of the home islands, the loss of the USSR as a possible intermediary for negotiating the end of the war when it invaded Manchuria, the firebombing of most major cities, and the atomic bombing of two.

Peace

One of the Bataan flights taxis alongside guards. (ww2db)

In an unlikely coincidence, the G4M1 would play a role in ending the war that it had been engaged in since the first salvos. A renovated G4M1, and a transport model of a converted G6M heavy fighter, were selected to ferry the Japanese delegation to the base at Ie Shima. Under direction from Gen. Douglas McArthur, both planes were painted white, and marked with dark green capitulation crosses, so as to make them unmistakable. They also flew under the names Bataan 1 & 2, in remembrance of the first major battle between the US and Japanese Armies, and the forced march inflicted on the Allied troops.

A veteran pilot, Lt. Sudo Den of the Yokosuka airgroup, was selected to lead the delegation to Ie Shima. They departed Kisarazu on August 19th, and were joined by a pair of American B-25 Mitchells of the 345 Bomber Group, and a B-17H search and rescue plane. The trip went without issue, and Lt. Gen. Kawabe Torashiro and the other 15 delegates deplaned, and boarded a Douglas C-54, which would fly them to Manila. With the war over, they returned via the same track, but with Bataan 1 undergoing maintenance, they all boarded the G6M. In spite of a forced landing near the Tenryu river due to a fuel leak, the delegation made it home safely.

The final service of the G4M was in dispersing the remaining Rikko air and ground crew. It was on August 23 that the remaining serviceable Rikko were assembled at Komatsu. From there, the planes flew across Japan to deliver the former air and ground crews to airfields where they could make the last leg of their journeys home.

In spite of the high losses incurred by these units for much of the war, there were a number of aviators who had survived the entirety of the conflict. Perhaps the longest serving of them was Lt(jg) Tsuneo Otake, who had begun his service in the older G3M over China, before transferring to the Genzan Air Group, where he participated in the campaign over Guadalcanal until he returned back to Japan in May of the following year. From there he joined a transport squadron flying the G6M. By the war’s end he had flown 3022 sorties and accumulated 5255 flight hours. Another veteran was Lieutenant, later Captain, Haruki Iki. Capt. Iki was a veteran of the attack on Force Z, and dropped a bouquet of flowers in remembrance for those lost in the days after the battle. He was also among those who survived the war, and would go on to start an association for Rikko veterans.

Handling Characteristics and Tactics

As a design that was borne out of extreme compromises, the G4M nevertheless proved an easy aircraft to fly. It was easily controllable, even in bad conditions, and very stable, presenting a lighter workload for the pilot. Both of these would prove essential for an aircraft designed to fly over exceptionally long distances, and from bases that would be plagued with poor weather. Overall, pilots regarded the flight characteristics of the G4M as dependable. The only major drawback to the design’s airworthiness was the lack of feathering propellers, which made bringing the aircraft back a more strenuous job that required considerably more corrective flying to cope with the increased drag.

Under non-combat flight conditions, there were five members of the crew seated in the cockpit. The captain, navigator, and radioman pulled double duty as gunners. (9gag)

Protection was very poor. The only armor plate aboard the plane protected the ammunition for the 20mm, and was judged to be so useless that it was almost universally removed from the plane. All members of the crew were vulnerable to gunfire, which given the near universality of .50 caliber guns among American fighters, proved deadly. Worse was the lack of fuel tank protection, or self sealing containers. These aircraft were equipped with CO2 flushed atmospheres beside the wing fuel stores, and CO2 extinguishers, but these proved unreliable in combating fuel fires. Later aircraft were given rubber sheeting on the underside the wings to give some degree of self sealing protection from flak and ground fire, but provided no protection from enemy aircraft. Ironically, structurally the aircraft proved very durable thanks to its forward fuselage and wings built as a single unit. It was fairly common for aircraft to come home on one engine or in extreme states of damage, just so long as there were no fuel tank fires.

Most of the defensive guns were not particularly effective at defending the aircraft. None of the gun positions were powered, and the forward 7.7mm machine gun had a very limited angle of traverse, in addition to proving difficult to move against the air stream. The rear gunner position was the exception, and featured a 20mm machine gun. It was called a machine gun as this was a naval aircraft, and the IJN considered the 20mm a small cartridge compared to some of the others in their inventory. This weapon could seriously damage a trailing fighter, but was somewhat restricted by its use of a drum magazine, the reloading of which was quite cumbersome.

The aircraft was often called ‘Hamaki’ by its crews, over its cylindrical fuselage, though it carried a darker double meaning when the aircraft’s flammability began to become well known. Subsequent names like ‘one shot lighter’ or ‘flying lighter’ accumulated as its service continued through 1942. The official American callsign for the aircraft was “Betty”.

The aircraft was employed in many roles, as a level bomber, torpedo bomber, maritime patrol plane, photo reconnaissance aircraft, and transport. The typical combat deployment was the Kokutai, or Air Group. The airgroup itself was the Hikotai, led by its Hikotaisho, and supported by its Hikokai, which represented all of the ground based personnel and equipment, which included transport aircraft. An air group’s command staff was a distinct element, not considered part of its Hikokai. Each Hikotai comprised up to 27 planes, with an airgroup capable of fielding multiple, and not needing to be of the same model, such that some units operated both bombers and fighters. In March 1944, the Hikotai were given much broader autonomy and were capable of deploying to bases distant from their original ground based Kokutai staff and ground crew, and attaching themselves to ground based services in areas they were redeployed to.

The largest combat formation was composed of 3, nine plane Chutai, which were themselves composed of 3, three plane Shotai. In combat, these units could be broken down into whatever size formation was needed. During torpedo attacks, the shotai would be divided into their own sections and could be used to attack a target from multiple directions, preventing them from evading. At a larger level, Chutai would conduct attacks separately, waiting to see the results of proceeding attacks, before choosing and committing a target based on the damage they’d taken.

Construction

Bulkhead diagram (G4M1 Manual)

The G4M1 Model 11, was a multipurpose twin engine bomber, and was an all metal, mid wing design. Its semi-monocoque fuselage was built as two halves, joined at the 24th bulkhead for ease of construction. The forward section was built as a unified wing-fuselage section, both to increase its structural strength, and reduce weight. The rear section was simpler, and its construction was given to other firms. Structurally, the aircraft made use of ‘extra super duralumin’, produced originally by Sumitomo metals before the war. It was an exceptionally strong material in aircraft design, and an area where Japanese aviation had forged ahead of the rest of the world. Once joined, the fuselage consisted of 38 bulkheads. At the nose was a glazed section for navigation, behind which there was a flat panel in the floor for aiming the bombsight. Several windows were installed along the nose for navigation and reconnaissance purposes. The cockpit was long, containing five crew positions, and doubled as an observation platform. The cockpit was equipped with radio navigation equipment and a level autopilot. The arrangement of instruments was somewhat unorthodox, with the pilot and copilot having non-identical sets of instruments on their respective sides. Notably, the copilot’s side lacks several navigational instruments, with the intent that he likely use the central panel which does have them, in the case of emergency. The fuselage carried a centerline fuel tank, along with a trio of tanks, which were situated in the fuselage and inner wing panel.

The aircraft’s navigator takes watch alongside the radioman. (aviacaoemfloripa)

The captain of the aircraft sat behind the pilot and copilot, and also doubled as the top gunner. The navigator sat at the rear, left side of the cockpit, with the radio operator sitting opposite him. Both of them also acted as the waist gunners in combat, with the navigator also being the bombardier. The cockpit and nose also doubled as watch stations for maritime patrol missions. The rear gunner was the only position without a secondary duty. It also was the only one with armor, with two small 5mm steel plates installed to protect the 20mm ammunition, but they were rarely kept aboard the plane.

The wings were built into the forward fuselage and were composed of an inner panel, outer panel, the engine mount, removable inner leading edges, and the flaps and ailerons. The wings were built incorporating an integral fuel tank between the spars, running from the fuselage to the end of the inner panel, with the surfaces of the wings representing the other walls of the container. These stores, combined with those in the fuselage, gave the aircraft a 4780 liter fuel capacity. External sections of 30mm rubber sheeting, installed from the 663rd plane onwards, provided a modicum of self sealing ability from punctures from below the aircraft. This added 300kg to the aircraft, reducing its speed by 5kts and reducing its range by 170 nm. The only other protective measures were flushing the compartments fore and aft of the wing tank with CO2, and adding CO2 fire extinguishers. The wings also contained a pair of two 150 liter oil tanks. The flaps and landing gear were electrically operated.

The tail section comprised a three section horizontal stabilizer featuring a center section embedded in the fuselage, connected to two outer panels. The vertical stabilizer featured a smaller, innerpanel, and a considerably larger outer panel. All of the control surfaces were equipped with trim tabs.

The Kasei 11 and 15 were fitted with metal Sumitomo, 3.4 meter, constant speed propellers. They began receiving prop spinners between the spring and summer of 1942. (arawasi-wildwings)

The aircraft was initially fitted with the Mitsubishi Kasei 11, a 42 liter, 14 cylinder radial engine which was rated at 1460hp at 2350 rpm, and had a full throttle height of 4.6km. It had a length of 1705mm and a height of 1340mm. It was replaced in March of 1942 with the Kasei 15, which incorporated a larger supercharger which improved its performance at higher altitudes. Apart from the supercharger, it was visually indistinguishable from the previous model. It produced 1420 hp at 2350 rpm, and had a full throttle height of 6km. Both used direct fuel injection and were equipped with a single stage, two speed supercharger, with the Kasei 15’s being far larger. Initially, there were only two exhaust stacks, but later models included one exhaust stack per cylinder.

Armament

The G4M1 had a bomb bay which could accommodate 800 kg of munitions. The bomb bay did not have retractable doors, but rather a removable fairing that was carried on the aircraft for reconnaissance, transportation, and ferry flights. The bomb load could consist of a single 500kg bomb, four of 250 kg bombs, twelve 60 kg bombs, and a variety of other devices, such as parachute flares, and target marking smoke. They were configured to use the Navy’s bombs, and with few exceptions were unable to make use of the weapons for Imperial Army aircraft. The suspension methods between the two forces differed, and their fuses were not interchangeable without the use of an adapter.

Ground crew maneuver a Type 91 aerial torpedo into place (rodswarbirds).

As with other Japanese torpedo attack aircraft, the G4M1 carried the Type 91 torpedo. This weapon was produced in a number of marks going back to 1931, though wartime stockpiles and production were the Models I, II, and III, possessing a common diameter. These had a diameter of 45 cm, and were powered by an eight cylinder, wet-heater type, radial steam engine. The Mod. It could carry a 150 kg warhead out to a range of 2 kilometers at a speed of 42 knots. The Mod. II, a 205 kg charge out to the same distance, with the Mod. III carrying a 240 kg warhead. The Mod.III also possessed an interchangeable warhead, allowing it to be converted to a Mod. IV, 300 kg, a V-Head 305 kg warhead, a Kite head at 355 kg, or the Mod.VII at 420 kg.

The Type 92 machine gun in its deployed position. (ww2db)

The bomber was equipped with three 7.7 mm Type 92 machine guns, and a single 20mm Type 99 machine gun. The Type 92’s were modernized variants of the British Lewis gun, being a gas blowback machine gun with a cyclic rate of 600 rounds per minute, and loaded from 97 cartridge pan magazines. The 20mm machine gun was an Oerlikon FFL adapted for an aircraft mount. It was an advanced primer blowback weapon with a cyclic rate of 490 rounds per minute. It could be loaded from 45, 60, or 100 round drum magazines. The 100 round magazines were a late war addition. The machine gun enclosures were two part blisters where the rearward half could be pulled inside the aircraft. The rear section was a conical frame that articulated to move with the position of the 20mm gun. By late 1942, it was commonly modified in the field by removing the rear half of the enclosure to give better visibility and field of fire. Later, it was redesigned to incorporate a rear cone with a framing that was less restrictive.

A view from the rear gunner’s position. A very common field modification involved removing the outer frame of the enclosure to improve visibility and allow for a greater traverse of the weapon, as has been done here. (aviaocampo)

Production

The G4M1 model 11 was produced at Mitsubishi Airframe Works No. 3 at Nagoya, with production beginning in 1940, with the completion of a single aircraft. Production picked up the following year at a low rate, peaking at 28 aircraft per month in December with 182 made during the year. Monthly production increased the following year, with around 30 planes being produced per month, with 39 being produced in December. 1943 production sat at roughly between 45 and 60 planes being produced per month, being produced alongside its replacement, the G4M2. Production of the G4M1 terminated in January of 1944, with a total of 1170 aircraft built, excluding the two prototypes and the abortive G6M1 project.

No.3 works fabricated the airframes and skinning for all of the aircraft built there, though other items including electrical components, instruments, wheel assemblies, rubber parts, pumps, and calves were supplied from other manufacturers. Conscripted labor began to be used early in the production of the G4M1, with conscript workers appearing in October 1941. The factory operated in two 11 hour shifts, with one hour and ten minutes in breaks for lunch and smoking. In addition to the G4M1, the plant was concurrently producing the A6M fighter ‘Zeke’ or Type Zero, the J2M ‘Jack’, and the F1 ‘Pete’ recon seaplane. Production of the G4M1 model 11 was terminated in January of 1944. It was superseded by the G4M2 Model 22 which replaced it on the production line.

There exists no documented variants of this aircraft, regardless of the model of engine or other modification, the aircraft was always referred to as G4M1 Model 11.

Mitsubishi G4M1 Model 11Specification

Engine Mitsubishi MK4E Kasei 15 (early models used the Kasei 11)
Engine Output 2x1420hp ( 2x1460hp)
Empty Weight 7000kg
Operating Weights 8810-13300kg
Maximum Range 2315 nm
Maximum Speed 252 knots at 4200m (without rubber wing sheeting)
Armament (payload limited by space not weight) 4x 7.7mm Machine Gun, 1x 20mm Machine Gun, 800kg payload
Crew Pilot, Copilot, Navigator/bombardier, Radio operator, Commander, Rear Gunner
Dimensions
Length 19.97m
Wingspan 24.88m
Wing Area 78.12m^2

Conclusion

The G4M1’s career spanned from triumph to disaster. (SDASM)

The G4M1 was perhaps the perfect material representation of the philosophy and martial attitudes of those who led Japan to war. It was an aircraft built entirely to suit the most aggressive plans possible, with little consideration given to its use outside of its, admittedly, broad focus, or a changing wartime environment. It was an excellent aircraft in prosecuting a war that had been meticulously planned, and was to end very quickly. Yet, this wasn’t the war Japan was to fight, instead finding themselves facing a flexible, and determined adversary with superior material and technical resources. In this shift, the compromises that made the G4M1 a deadly, long range weapon, became serious liabilities that threatened the usefulness of the aircraft. While the virtue of self-sacrifice was paramount to the Japanese military, it was to prove self destructive when the lives of experienced airmen far exceeded that of the aircraft they flew.

Illustration

The Kanoya Air Group was among the first units to be supplied with the G4M1, and flew them to devastating effect against American forces in the Philippines and Force Z. Kanoya Kokutai, January 1942.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Misawa Air Group was formed after the Japanese entry to WWII, its first combat station was Rabaul. The white square around the Hinomaru emblem denotes this plane as being part of an operational training unit. Misawa Kokutai, June 1943.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bataan 2 joined a G6M1 transport in delivering the Japanese surrender delegation to Manilla.

Credits

Written By Henry H.

Edited By Henry H.

Illustrated by Oussama Mohamed “Godzilla”

Sources:

Primary

G4M1 Model 11 Manual

Japanese Aircraft Performance and Characteristics TAIC Manual No. 1. Technical Air Intelligence Center. 1944.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd (Mitsubishi Jukogyo KK) Corporation Report No. 1 (Airframes and Engines). United States Strategic Bombing Survey Aircraft Division. 1947.

The Japanese Aircraft Industry. United States Strategic Bombing Survey Aircraft Division. 1947.

USS Chicago (CA29) Loss in Action 29-30 January 1943 Guadalcanal Island. Buships War Damage Report No. 36.

TM 9-1986-4/TO 39B-1A-11. Japanese Explosive Ordnance (Bombs, Bomb Fuzes, Land Mines, Grenades, Firing Devices and Sabotage Devices. United States Government Printing Office.

Japanese Air Weapons and Tactics. Military Analysis Division. 1947.

Secondary:

The Cactus Air Force Air War Over Guadalcanal. Eric Hammel & Thomas McKelvey Cleaver. 2022.

Neptune’s Inferno The U.S. Navy at Guadalcanal. James D. Hornfischer. 2011.

Fire and Fortitude The US Army in the Pacific War 1941-1943. John C. McManus. 2019.

Mitsubishi Type 1 Rikko ‘Betty’. Osamu Tagaya. 2001.

Profile Mitsubishi G4M ‘Betty’ & Ohka Bomb. Rene J. Francillon Ph.D. 1971.

American Nightfighter Aces of World War 2. Andrew Thomas and Warren Thompson. 2008.

Conquering the Night Army Air Forces Night Fighters at War. Stephen L. McFarland. 1998.

Japanese Aircraft of the Pacific War. Rene J. Francillon Ph.D. 1970.

Sunburst. Mark R. Peattie. 2001.

Kaigun. Mark R. Peattie and David C. Evans. 1997.

McCawley II (AP-10). Naval History and Heritage Command.

Birmingham II (CL-62). Naval History and Heritage Command.

Denver II (CL-58). Naval History and Heritage Command.

McKean I (Destroyer No. 90). Naval History and Heritage Command.

Intrepid IV (CV-11). Naval History and Heritage Command.

USS San Francisco (CA38) Gunfire Damage Battle of Guadalcanal 13 November 1942. War Damage Report No. 26. 1942.

Lt(jg) Haruki Iki Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN), Kanoya Kokutai (Kanoya Air Group). Pacific Wrecks.https://pacificwrecks.com/people/veterans/iki/index.html