Mitsubishi G4M1 Model 11 “Betty”

Empire of Japan (1941)

Multirole Medium Bomber: 1170 built

Ponderous looking, yet agile, the G4M1 proved to be among the most dangerous weapons in Japan’s Naval Arsenal for early years of WWII. (SDASM)

Designed as a replacement for the aging G3M ‘Nell’, as a long range bomber and torpedo attack aircraft, the G4M represented a comprehensive improvement. In this plane, the Imperial Japanese Navy found a high speed bomber capable of carrying out raids, and engaging enemy ships at sea at otherwise unheard of ranges. During the campaigns in China, and first year of war in the Pacific, the G4M wrought havoc on Allied forces on land and at sea. However, its range and speed were achieved in sacrificing crew and fuel protection, and as the tide of war turned, the same design philosophy that gave the G4M its lethal edge, would see the crews flying the aircraft endure staggering losses.

The Road to War

The Imperial Japanese Navy rose to rapid prominence in the late 19th to early 20th centuries, alongside the equally rapid pace of Japan’s industrialization. Its victory against the Qing during the first Sino Japanese war saw them claim Korea and lay the ground for future Imperialistic inroads into continental Asia. Against Russia in the Russo Japanese war, they shocked the world after demolishing two major fleets and seizing Port Arthur, this being the first time a European country had lost to a non-european industrial power. The rise of Japan’s naval strength was a necessity of its mission, accepted since it first began industrialization, to expand its economic sphere and gain access to the necessary resources which home islands lacked. Oil, rubber, and ore were the foremost of its material needs, but there was also a desire to prove the racial superiority of the Japanese over the people of Asia, and rise above the Europeans and Americans who dominated the region. In the long term, this set the stage for brutal wars of expansion, conducted using the most advanced weapons available, over distances that dwarfed nearly every military campaign that had since been conducted. However, to fight such wars, the newest weapons of war and methods of manufacture had to be sought out.

The United Kingdom would prove an ideal partner in this, and would prove to be a critical source for military aid and equipment, and an alliance began in 1902, lasting two decades. Britain’s aim in this agreement was to ensure that the Russian Empire would not become a challenge to them in Asia. Among the earliest and most visible boons of the alliance was the Battleship Mikasa, purchased from Britain, and serving as the Japanese flagship during the Russo Japanese war. Over the coming decades, the exchange would bring invaluable experience, and modern equipment to Japan. By the end of the First World War, Japan had grown considerably as a naval and industrial power, with an economy now dependent on agricultural imports from continental Asia, and oil from Borneo and America. Their European colonial challengers were also diminished in number, with Russia’s navy diminished even further during the revolution, and Germany losing its Pacific and Asiatic holdings, to Japan’s gain.

Naval planners thus looked to new opportunities and conquests. The greatest of these was China, by then descended into warlordism, but an economic power nonetheless. By the start of the twenties, the Washington Naval treaty would affirm the integrity of Chinese territory in spite of the conflict there, and assure equal economic rights for those wishing to trade. While the Japanese government would maintain these two principles for the rest of the 1920’s, the Navy itself was becoming more dominated by voices seeking to challenge the treaty and other agreements as being strictly tools of European and American naval dominance and interests. A faction led by Vice Admiral Kato Kanji would hold to a different principle, asserting that “the United States, by its limitless economic resources, by its pursuit of policies of economic aggression, and, in China in particular, by its provocation of anti-Japanese activities, threatens the Japanese position in China for which our nation has risked its destiny.”

While Japan had yet to experience the era of political turmoil, assassinations, and the subsequent rule by the military, the roots of the eventual conflict with the US were found in the years after the Great War. In accordance with the anti-treaty faction, the United States was selected as the chief ‘hypothetical enemy’ when the nation’s Imperial Defense Policy was revised in 1923. Doing so not only meant challenging a materially and technologically superior opponent, but also claiming much of Asia for itself as a matter of industrial, and racial, destiny.

Building an Arsenal

To face the United State and European powers, modernization was paramount. In aviation, the greatest step came with the post-WWI Sempill Mission. While Japan had a nascent aviation industry which had begun development during the Great War, nearly every plane in use was imported, and what was domestically produced was of foreign design. As part of the last major exchanges in the dying Anglo-Japanese alliance, the Japanese Navy requested assistance in the field of aviation from the British in 1920. While there were major disagreements within Britain on such a technology transfer, the hopes for major partnerships and sales with the British aviation industry overcame such doubts. The mission arrived the following year, led by former RAF officer Baron Sir Williams Frances-Forbes, who had brought with him experts in aircraft design, construction, training, and use. Materially, he brought airplanes of nearly every type from fighters to torpedo planes, numbering over a hundred in total. The mission at Kasumigaura would prove to be nothing less than a spectacular leap for Japanese military aviation, putting it well on the path to self sufficiency. Combined with the Royal Navy’s advice on the construction of the Japanese aircraft carrier Hosho, the first carrier built from the ground up for the role, Japan would now possess some of the most essential tools in the wars to come. Just as the technical assistance ended, so too did the alliance with Britain, which lapsed in 1923.

By the end of the 1920’s, the Japanese Navy was a world leader in new naval theories, especially aircraft carrier development. Here the carrier Akagi sports a triple deck arrangement, which was soon done away with. (wikimedia)

The airplane industry grew slowly, first as a series of small shops producing a modest number of mostly foreign planes, but growing into larger enterprises. The largest of these manufacturers were Mitsubishi, Nakajima, and Kawasaki, which provided the nucleus for the rest of the cottage industry based aviation sector. Arguably the largest of these was Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, through its branch, the Mitsubishi Internal Combustion Engine Co. at Kobe. Concurrent with the Sempill mission, the company’s aircraft manufacturing effort was shifted to Nagoya, which would remain the center for Mitsubishi’s airplane development and production. In the years to come, additional production plants would sprout from the main facilities in Nagoya, with separate airframe and engine departments being founded by 1935.

While the aviation industry was slowly rising, the primary means of war against the United States navy was to draw in, and then attack the enemy fleet once it was deep within Japanese territory. It was hoped that through this single decisive engagement that any war could be quickly be settled, and thus Japanese supremacy over Asia was assured. It wasn’t until far later that the US would heavily outnumber the Japanese fleet, and serious changes would need to be made to this strategy. The general approach to this disparity was two contradictory schools of thought. The first was to overmatch the enemy on the technical and operational level, most clearly demonstrated in the development of highly effective oxygen fueled torpedoes, outranging the enemy with superior long range gunnery, and the development of keen night-fighting training. Against this program was the belief that any material disparities could be overcome by the superior, unique qualities of the martial spirit of the Japanese soldier, whose supposed unwavering morale and willpower could deliver victory against a better equipped enemy.

This strategy was entirely battleship focused until the thirties, with aviation playing a very small role until several crucial technical developments were rolled out. Aircraft at the time had a very limited range of action, small payloads, and were very fragile. Even though the Japanese Navy had been among the first to use aircraft in combat in the First World War, the airplane was seen as a tool for local defense and reconnaissance. Torpedo aircraft were particularly promising, but in a naval doctrine that required striking out with overwhelming force at long ranges, wood and canvas biplanes simply were not up to the task.

It was the development of all-metal, streamlined, monoplanes that proved to be the deciding factor in shifting the idea of the airplane as a defensive weapon, to one which could deliver deadly blows from afar. As the striking range of aircraft increased, so too did the potential range of the ‘decisive battle’, which by the late 1930s was planned for around the Marianas. As these technical developments progressed, Japan would find itself evermore under the influence of the military, whose factions would launch a war against China. They would seize Manchuria in 1932, and planned larger campaigns deep into the Chinese heartland. Given the vast distances involved, the Imperial Japanese Army and Navy sought new bombers with unprecedented range to reach targets over a thousand nautical miles away.

Rikko

The war against China, and the predicted war with America, would require the use of aircraft in roles that were restricted by available plane’s very modest performance. Crucially for the Army and Navy, by the mid 30’s, light and medium bombers were growing ever more capable, and Japan’s aircraft carrier program was world class. At this time, Rear Admiral Yamamoto Isoroku, the chief of the technical bureau of the Naval Aviation Department, was pursuing a program to achieve technical independence from foreign manufacturers. However, he had not merely wished for autonomy in aviation, but was interested in developing several new, critical weapons.

Among the first of these was a long range, land-based attack aircraft or, Rikujo Kogeki-ki. At the direction of Vice Admiral Matusyama Shigeru, Rear Adm. Yamamoto and his team were directed to research the requirements for a long range bomber capable of engaging targets with bombs or torpedoes in support of the battlefleet. With their findings, they approached Mitsubishi with the requirements for a new aircraft. This materialized in the Mitsubishi G1M, a modern twin engine bomber and reconnaissance aircraft. The experimental plane first flew in 1934 and was to provide the basis for a new bomber design.

The G3M was a thoroughly modern bomber, if fragile. It served to prove the viability of the long range torpedo bomber. (sdasm)

The new Mitsubishi G3M was developed by head designer Honjo Kiro. Much like the G1M, it was a sleek, all metal, twin engine aircraft. It had a range of 1540 nautical miles and an 800kg payload, presenting a very impressive level of performance for 1935. Particularly impressive was its range, which was beyond any other bomber save for the nascent Boeing B-17 under development in the United States. Achieving this range was largely a factor of streamlining, and some very extreme weight saving techniques. This included foregoing any protection for the fuel tanks and crew. Fragility aside, the aircraft was almost exactly what the Navy was looking for, with Captain Onishi Takijiro, head of the Instruction division at Koku Hombu, expressing great satisfaction with the new plane when he inspected the Kisarazu Air Group in 1936, this being among the first of the new Naval land attack units.

The G3M would serve the Navy well in China, where it attacked distant targets, being defensive positions, and cities, in an attempt to prevent their fortification and cow the Chinese government into capitulating. The bomber was as the Navy wished, but they found that it was extremely vulnerable to enemy fighters, given its lack of armor and modest defensive armament. Despite the experiences in China, and the heavy losses incurred, the Navy was largely disinterested in the succeeding design possessing any greater protection than the G3M. Instead, they requested a twin engined design with a maximum speed of 215 knots at an altitude of 3 km, a range of 2600 nautical miles, and a combat range of 2000 nautical miles. They did not request any increase in payload size, but the overall design requirements were extreme. Given the G3M was already a streamlined design, which required major compromises to its protection in order to achieve its speed and range, producing an aircraft some 27 knots faster and capable of flying 460 nm further would prove extremely challenging.

The G3M wrought destruction across China, from the raids on Nanjing and Shanghai, to the sustained bombardment of the city of Chongqing. (SDASM)

There would be no competition for the design, as Mitsubishi received the development contract directly from the Navy in September of 1937. Honjo Kiro would again be called upon to lead the design effort, though he would be in the United States until October of that year. Finding the Navy’s requirements for the new plane bordering on unreasonable, Kiro would instead suggest a four engined design, feeling the requested pair of 1000 hp Mitsubishi Kinsei engines being inadequate. During early design proposals with Naval staff officers, he would attempt to introduce a four engined rikko, but was angrily rebuffed by Rear Admiral Misao Wada, the chairman of the congress. The admiral, nearly losing his temper, shouted “The navy will decide matters of operational need! Mitsubishi should just keep quiet and build a twin engined attack aeroplane in accordance with navy specifications! Erase the drawing of the four engined aeroplane on the blackboard at once!”

Honjo was thus forced to return to the twin engined concept, and was also given a new requirement that the aircraft feature a defensive 20mm cannon at its tail. The list of requirements now completely eliminated the possibility that the new design could be a derivative of the previous G3M. Heading the team on his return to Japan in April of 1938, Honjo oversaw the program, joined by Kushibe Shiro and Hikada Tetsuro. He had the benefit of wind tunnel research conducted the previous December, but would have the unenviable task of designing to the Navy’s unchanged requirements. The G4M materialized as a bomber with a wide, but streamlined fuselage, built in two halves to ease production. Such was the diameter of the fuselage that visiting German engineers from Heinkel were confused that the wide bulkhead they were inspecting was for a twin engined aircraft. The wings were built incorporating a massive integral fuel tank between the spars, with the surfaces of the wings representing the other walls of the container. These massive, but unprotected, stores contributed much to the aircraft’s enormous fuel capacity.

Much to the relief of Honjo, he was able to argue for more powerful engines, shelving the 1000hp Kinsei radials, for the new 1530hp Mitsubishi Kasei. Aside from this reprieve, the design of the aircraft was a fairly chaotic affair, as the engineers at Mitsubishi were being reshuffled between the G4M, and the A6M Type Zero fighter under development by Horikoshi Jiro’s team. The first prototype would be completed in September of 1939, and was transported from Nagoya to Kagamigahara for flight tests, as Mitsubishi lacked a company airfield at their factory. It was first flown by Mistubishi test pilot Kazuo Shima on October 23, the tests revealed some issues with handling, but the aircraft performed well. Military trials were conducted at Yokosuka in early 1940, where it was joined by the second prototype. Both aircraft impressed the Naval staff there, with the plane well exceeding the requirements placed on it, reaching a top speed of 240 knots and possessing a range of 3000 nautical miles.

The G4M prototype, here sporting a ventral gunner position. (warfarehistorynetwork)

Unfortunately for the design team, these impressive performance figures inspired the navy to request Mitsubishi develop the G4M as a heavy fighter. They wished to provide a long range escort to the G3M squadrons in China, which were without air cover on deep raids. There were also concerns that switching to the production of a new bomber would result in too steep a drop in G3M supplies, and reduce the complement of squadrons currently deployed. The new G6M ‘wingtip fighter’ featured a reduced fuel load and a pair of 20mm cannons in a ventral pod. In any case, the new weight distribution of the aircraft ruined the good handling of the G4M, and it simply didn’t have the performance needed. Some 30 planes were built and shelved to later be converted into transport aircraft.

Pre-production of the bomber proceeded only after the futile attempt at converting it to a heavy fighter. In December of 1940, it would officially be designated the Type 1 land attack bomber, for the Imperial year 2601. In service, the aircraft was typically referred to either G4M, or more casually as Hamaki, or cigar, in reference to the shape of its fuselage. Among Honjo’s team it bore the far less flattering nickname of namekuji, or slug.

The model accepted for service was some 520 kg heavier, and some 9 kts slower than the prototypes, after the typical design modifications were made. It too now only had a range of 2315 nautical miles once it was at a full combat load. This was, however, more than enough to satisfy the Navy. They began receiving growing numbers of the plane as pre-production began at Mitsubishi’s No.3 aircraft plant, with these 13 planes proceeding mass production. Apart from some minor leaks in the integral wing tanks, the bombers entered service without issue on April 2, 1941.

Debut in China

The next war with China escalated from a minor border dispute into one of the bloodiest wars ever waged. By 1940, the Japanese Imperial Army and Navy had pushed into the Chinese heartland, seized many of the largest and most important coastal cities, and had taken the capital of Nanjing, leaving it unrecognizable after an orgy of violence. The Nationalist Kuomintang government was, however, resolved to continue the war by whatever means. Despite Japan’s air superiority, the Chinese Air Force stayed mobile and well outside the range of Japanese fighters. They could vacate their airfields quickly and inflict heavy losses on Japan’s bombers which had been despatched against their airfields, flying great distances without fighter protection. It was with the introduction of the high performance G4M, and the extremely long ranged A6M fighter, that this strategy was to unravel.

The key feature of the G4M was its phenomenal range, achieved through its wide fuselage stores, and integral wing tanks. (rodswarbirds)

The first G4M’s to see combat were part of the Imperial Japanese Naval Air Service’s 11th Air Fleet, formed in January in 1941. This force was composed mostly of the old G3M, but had received 30 examples of the new model bomber in July. They were to continue the aerial bombardment of many Chinese cities, beginning with Chengtu, but were soon to attempt the further destruction of the Chinese air force. The A6M fighters that had made their debut the year prior had the range to pursue targets deep within China, but were unable to hold formation with the old G3M bombers without weaving, reducing their range, and left them unable to follow them at night. However, the new G4M had a cruising speed that the fighters could match.

These two aircraft were thus essential to operation O-Go, a gambit intended to cripple the Chinese air force in some three months. The raids were launched in the early morning well before sunrise, with the bombers acting as the navigational leaders for the fighters, which kept the formation with the bombers in single-file. The force would then arrive at sunrise, to give little warning, and allow the bombers to attack as many of the grounded planes as possible, with those who were able to get off the ground being attacked by the A6Ms. The first attack was carried out on August 11, against an airfield near Ichang. The Chinese’s air force SB-2 bombers had scrambled, leaving two unserviceable planes to be destroyed, and had sent up fighters to break up the attack. To their surprise, they found fighters guarding the formation, one far more advanced than their Soviet-made I-153 biplanes. The Japanese fighters, and the gunners of the G4M’s, would claim five victories against the defenders, suffering no casualties themselves.

The operation, however, would be canceled as tensions with America and Europe had risen to the point of conflict. O-Go was suspended, but had demonstrated the long range strike abilities of the IJNAF, and the shocking capability of its long range fighter escorts. Against the bases near Ichang, the raiders had flown 47 miles further than the distance from London to Berlin. Such a feat would not be replicated until P-51B was introduced with the US Army Air Forces, and flown deep into Germany some three years later. These distances also show the long range character of the war to be fought across the Pacific, and explains the otherwise seemingly unreasonable range requirements requested by the Navy.

Setting the Board

While the Japanese invasion of China had at first been decisive, and horrifically destructive in its opening phases, their lines of communication stretched on, and the Chinese Army was growing into a more dangerous opponent. Relations with other powers with major economic interests in China collapsed, spectacularly in the case of the United States, leading to the cancellation of the US-Japan Commercial treaty. The concerns of European powers were growing too, but far less so in the face of the German-Soviet invasion of Poland in August of 1939. Meanwhile in Japan, the Navy’s ambitions were again stoked, remembering their own territorial gains of the last major war between the European powers. The most vital of these potential spoils were oil fields of Borneo, held by the forces of the now occupied Netherlands. This would grant Japan energy independence from the US, against which they had been planning an inevitable war for over a decade.

Planning and theory, however, were swept aside when the US imposed a total trade embargo in August of 1941, with the UK and Netherlands following shortly after. Rather than be an incentive to pursue diplomatic means, it instead drove the hawks in Japan’s military-dominated government to at last embark on a conflict it had long been expecting. The Imperial Japanese Navy and Army thus began working on the arrangements in what would be a rapid series of offensives across the Pacific that would wreck the American Pacific fleet before it had a chance to be mobilized, seize the vital defensive perimeter of Malaya, and oil rich colonies of the Dutch.

The G4M1 was to be a decisive weapon across the Southern Asian theater. As the carrier was to the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Rikko was to the offensive which spanned from Malaya to Borneo. (aviocampo)

In regard to the land based Naval Air forces, their task would be to decimate enemy air forces before they had a chance to strike at the fleets and armies that would soon take and occupy vast swaths of South East Asia. Squadrons of G3M and G4M bombers were thus based at Formosa, to strike the American Army Airforce in the Philippines, and from what was formerly French Indochina, to assault the British forces in Malaya. Of chief importance were two targets, the Royal Navy battleship Prince of Whales and battlecruiser Repulse, which were enroute to Malaya, and the large contingent of American aircraft based in the Philippines. From the 26 of November to the 7th of December, the Japanese Navy embarked on a silent offensive, as its fleets crept toward their targets in Thailand, Malaya, Borneo, Guam, and Hawaii. Even before the war was declared, bombers were enroute to attack their targets as part of an offensive that dwarfed all others in regard to time and space.

Bombing of the Philippines

The attack force set against the Philippines was the 11th Air Fleet, which had at its disposal 81 G4M bombers and a number of the old G3M, along with a complement of 90 A6M fighters. Based in Formosa, their targets were the American Army Air Corps’ Nichols and Clark’s airfields. The American complement at these bases was considerable, numbering 35 of the new Boeing B-17 bombers, and 107 P-40 fighter aircraft, for a total of 227 aircraft, representing a very modern, and heavy strike force.

The G4Ms would however, not be the first to attack, with the air wing of the aircraft carrier Ryujo having hit positions in Mindanao, to the South, and the Army’s bombers, hitting Luzon, in the north. Thick fog had delayed the launching of the December 8th attack, and the Nichols airfield mission shifted to attack the airfield at Iba. Clark airfield remained a vital target, with two waves of G4M’s departing under the commands of Commander Suda Yushio and Lt. Commander Nonaka Taro. Commencing several hours after the Pearl Harbor attack, the commanders led the Takao and Kanoya Air Groups up to an altitude of 7000m with their A6M escorts, expecting a grueling fight to the targets ahead.

The Kanoya Air Group would prove to be among the oldest and well accomplished of the Rikko units, playing a crucial role across the Southern Asian front. (SDASM)

When news of the war broke out, the commander of the Far Eastern Air Force, Lt. General Lewis Brereton, attempted to launch an immediate attack against the Japanese forces in Formosa, using his in all likelihood, inadequate 35 B-17s. However, when he attempted to receive permission to launch the attack from the theater commander, General Douglas MacCarthur, he was instead held up by the General’s chief of staff, Maj. Gen. Sutherland. Unable to launch the attack, and uninterested in rebasing his bombers to a smaller airfield which he felt was unsuitable for his formation which was soon to receive further bombers, he instead kept his aircraft prepared for the attack, and sent out an early morning fighter patrol as cover.

By the time the Japanese strike force was well underway, Brereton’s fighters were turning back home to be refueled. Observers would spot the massive Japanese formation, but all attempts to warn Clark field failed, its only hope now was were its cover fighters from Del Carmen field. However, dust storms had kept all aircraft at Del Carmen grounded, and thus Commander Suda’s forces came upon a perfect target. With much of the US FEAF’s planes cleanly lined up around Clark field, the destruction was swift and overwhelming. Bombs smashed everything from the planes parked in ready positions, to airbases facilities, with the anti-aircraft batteries trying to hit the raiders using old and defective ammunition, the most recent of which was produced in 1932. Only four P-40’s were able to get airborne, and were soon lost, with the Japanese A6M fighters descending and attacking targets that had escaped the bombers. The Iba attack was equally one sided, and also claimed the only working American radar station in the Philippines. In all, both airfields were knocked out, the B-17’s were lost, and about 24 of the P-40’s were written off with many more damaged, representing a combat loss of two squadrons. The Japanese would only lose 7 planes, the only bomber lost to a landing accident on its return home.

The timing and breadth of the Southern Asian offensive seemed almost unimaginable before the war.  (campaigns of the pacific war)

The combined Japanese preparations, and the dysfunction of General MacCarthur’s command, had created a perfect storm that had largely annihilated the FEAF on the first day of the war. Even the staff of the Japanese Navy’s 11th Air fleet, Capt. Takahashi Chihaya believed, at the very least that, the B-17’s might have been rebased to the southern, and more defensible Del Monte airbase, which would have created serious challenges to the ongoing campaign to invade the Philippines. Few could have imagined the G4M’s strike could have been so decisive.

Force Z

While the FEAF was no longer mission capable, the next greatest threat in Southern Asia were the British garrison forces in Singapore, who were largely a responsibility of the Japanese Army, and Force Z, a pair of powerful warships dispatched weeks earlier to strengthen the British position after Japan had seized France’s Vietnamese colony. A battleship and battlecruiser, they represented a massive boost to British capabilities in the region, though the carrier support they were to receive was lost when HMS Indomitable ran aground and was laid up for repairs. Before the war had begun, these ships were merely intended to dissuade the Japanese from threatening Malaya and Singapore, as most of the Royal Navy was still tied down in Europe and the Atlantic. With the mission of deterrence gone on the morning of December 7th, the force’s commander, Admiral Tom Phillips, decided to take the most aggressive plan of action possible and attempt to thwart Japanese landing operations. Rather than choose to remain a fleet-in-being and attempt to shore up the defense of Singapore, or wait and attempt to merge with the joint Dutch-American naval forces, the Admiral gave the order to deploy his battleship, battlecruiser, and four destroyers into the sea of Siam.

The extreme range of the G4M1 allowed the IJN to strike at many targets once believed to be at a safe distance. Many western observers believed it to only have a range comparable to their own twin engine bombers. (sdasm)

It may seem foolish to have charged out without dedicated air cover, but until then, no heavy warship had ever been sunk by air attack, and he would have been out of range for nearly any other conventional torpedo bomber. The Royal Navy’s experience in Norway the previous year only reinforced this, as while German bombers had damaged several Allied cruisers, none had been lost. Beyond this, the airfield at Kota Bharu that would have supported him had been overrun by the rapid advance of the Japanese Army down the Malaysian peninsula. The Japanese Navy too had been landing marines down the coast, and when the Admiral received word at midnight December 9th that a landing force was unloading its forces at Kuantan, he set course to catch them at sunrise the next day.

As one of the Japanese Navy’s primary targets, Force Z was under considerable surveillance even before the war had begun. When they sortied on the 8th, Vice Admiral Osawa Jisaburo, the commander of the Southern Fleet, gave the Rikko units the mission to find and sink Force Z. Unable to pursue them the following day due to bad weather, the British fleet was spotted by submarine I-56 and its position was relayed to bombers. The next day, three Chutai comprising 88 planes of both the new G4M and the older G3M, launched at 06:44, to find and sink HMS Prince of Wales and Repulse. Most of the force carried torpedoes, with the 27 G3M’s carrying armor piercing bombs. Force Z was again discovered by a Genzan Air Group Rikko, and when they were joined by the bomb-laden Mihoro units, made the first attack on British warships. The attack began in a text book fashion, with a high altitude unit carrying out a level bomb attack while the torpedo aircraft made their attack runs in the confusion. 9 G3M’s dropped strings of bombs on the warships, scoring one hit, while 16 G4Ms carried out their torpedo attack. One bomb struck Repulse amidships, with the rest sending up torrents of water around the heavy warships in a shower of near misses. Some ten minutes later, the G4Ms carried out a multi-direction ‘hammer and anvil’ attack against HMS Prince of Whales, and despite the intensive evasive maneuvers, one torpedo struck the battleship on its port aft section. The explosion disabled its portside propellers and caused water to surge up the shaft into the portside engine space. With the battleship now flooding and navigationally impaired, the Japanese bombers departed, leaving the British warship in a poor state while the next attack wave assembled.

The G3M’s carried out level bombing attacks on the two warships, while the newer bombers carried out torpedo runs. The assault would comprise elements of the Kanoya, Genzan, and Mihoro Air Groups (Wikimedia)

With the position and course of Force Z relayed, the assembled formation now turned to engage them, with Lt. Cmdr. Shichiso Miyauchi as formation leader. Even with the information on the position and course of the British fleet, they were still hidden by low cloud cover. When they reached the reported position, Lt. Cmdr. Shichiso spotted a seaplane launched from the HMS Repulse and gave the order to descend through the clouds. The bombers found themselves 11 nautical miles away from the British force, HMS Prince of Wales showing a list.

The Lt. Cmdr. lead the first 9 plane Chutai against HMS Prince of Wales, which in response increased its speed to 28 knots, and began veering to starboard. The second and third divisions of this force were unaware of the damage the battleship had sustained, and set course to anticipate it making an evasive maneuver to port. When this never came, they broke off and went for HMS Repulse. This left Lt. Cmdr. Shichiso’s 3 plane unit to deal the finishing blow. He ordered the plane’s pilot and co-pilot to refrain from releasing the torpedo until they were within 500 meters of the target, then his plane and the number 3 aircraft, dropped their torpedoes, the second having lost sight of the target through heavy anti-aircraft fire. HMS Prince of Wales was struck on the starboard bow, and below the bridge. Now mortally wounded, most of the formation turned its attention to HMS Repulse.

Unlike the battleship, HMS Repulse was mostly undamaged, and taking extreme evasive maneuvers in an attempt to throw off the attack of six incoming torpedo bombers. Well trained against evasive targets, the Rikko approached from both sides and all but one plane launched their weapon was released, the battlecruiser taking a hit on its port side. The plane that was unable to make its attack then turned its attention to the HMS Prince of Wales and launched its torpedo, striking the battleship on its aft starboard side.

The second Chutai, under Lt. Higashi was next, dividing its attention between stricken British warships. They succeeded in striking HMS Prince of Wales again, though failing to hit Repulse, as it maneuvered through the spread of torpedoes launched against it. The last strikes came from Lt. Haruki Iki’s Chutai, and after an appraisal of the two damaged ships, decided that HMS Repulse was the more important target. Lt.Haruki’s plane led the attack from an altitude of 30m, nearly grazing the ship as he passed it. With both of his wingmen going down in flames from anti-aircraft fire, but their torpedoes launched, Lt. Haruki’s shotai scored three hits on Repulse, with the opposing side of the attack scoring one hit as well. The order to abandon Repulse was given at 12:30 with the ship quickly succumbing to flooding, this quick decision allowing several hundred men to escape the ship before it capsized. HMS Prince of Wales went down about an hour later, taking with it Captain John Leach, and Admiral Tom Phillips.

For the Japanese airmen, only four aircraft had been lost and they had proven a decisive lesson which all Navies were quick to learn, ships without air support were in mortal danger from aircraft. While theoretically, it had seemed possible a capital ship could be sunk from the air, this was the first time two such warships had been sunk in true combat conditions. Not only had the Rikko crews proven air power was now the deciding factor at sea, but in a strategic sense they had cleared the sea of Allied capital ships from India to Hawaii, and the IJN could land troops along the coast without fear of ambush.

Lt. Haruki’s two wingmen were the only aircraft losses with fatal results, with one G3M crash landing on its return to Vietnam, and four more planes needing a great deal of repairs. On his next flight over this area, the Lieutenant dropped two bouquets over the scene of the battle.

The Attack on USS Lexington

While the Rikko enjoyed great success in the early days of the war, one encounter would prove to be a sign of the difficulties to come. In the opening weeks of the New Guinea campaign, a task force centered around the fleet carrier USS Lexington was preparing to raid Rabaul, a newly captured Japanese Naval anchorage which would prove pivotal to the Japanese thrusts into New Guinea and the Solomon Islands. Detecting the force at long range, the 4th Air Groups was given the task of intercepting it on February tenth, 1942. 17 G4Ms were sortied in two groups against the task force, but without fighter escort, as the A6M units available lacked the necessary external fuel tanks needed for the mission. Led by Lt. Cdr. Ito Takuzo, they carried an armament of bombs. Detected, and set upon by Lexington’s fighters, several of the bombers were downed before having the chance to attack their target. The remaining aircraft of both units scored no hits.

The Lt. Cdr’s foiled attempt at Jibaku, or self destruction with the intent of dealing a blow to the enemy, his plane was struck by anti-aircraft fire as it neared USS Lexington. (WW2DB)

Lt. Cdr. Ito’s aircraft was badly damaged, one engine being entirely shot away by an American fighter. In their fatally damaged plane, the crew then attempted to try and fly into the USS Lexington. However, on the approach, their plane was riddled by anti-aircraft fire, and sent flying into the sea. In all, only two aircraft of the attack force were able to make it home, showing that unescorted attacks on ships with fighter cover were unlikely to succeed, and could only be made with extremely high casualties. Over succeeding campaigns, it would not be a lesson that would be taken to heart.

Battle for Port Moresby & The Bombing of Australia

While the IJN’s Fast Attack Force failed to eliminate the American Carriers in the Pacific, the loss of the American Battlefleet was a catastrophe, one that would allow the Japanese to advance swiftly through the central and southern Pacific. MacArthur would flee the Philippines, and Lt. General Arthur Percival would surrender Singapore, both after botched attempts at defending their territories. The Japanese Army and Navy would surge south, capturing rubber plantations, and the crucial Borneo oil fields. During this southern advance, the G4M would play a crucial role, in suppressing the RAF around Singapore, engaging American shipping around the Philippines, and harassing the joint American-British-Dutch-Australian cruiser force before its first, and only battle with the Japanese fleet.

With the vital resources of the Indies secured, the goal of the next phase was to build a defensive perimeter around the heart of this vast stretch of newly conquered territory. The next target was the anchorage of Port Moresby in Southern New Guinea, which if captured, would prove an excellent stronghold which directly threatened Australia. Before the carrier battle of the Coral Sea, G4M units were providing support to the amphibious landings in New Guinea. Lae and Salamaua were the first to fall in March, with the campaign continuing until the entire northern coast was held by the Japanese Navy. These operations would continue without challenge until the forces at Port Moresby were reinforced, first by a P-40 equipped squadron of the RAAF, and later by an American squadron flying P-39’s.

Against the defenders were the 4th and Tainan Air Groups.Their target was Port Moreseby itself, hoping to harass shipping and deplete the air strength of the defenders. The first major aerial engagement occurred on April 6th, where 7 G4M’s encountered five Allied fighters, surprisingly none were lost, though five returned with damage, and the loss of one crewmember. This encounter aside, the bomber units launched near daily raids against the Allied stronghold through May, even after the invasion force had been turned back after the Battle of the Coral Sea. After mid May, they sought to replenish their numbers, and returned to Port Moresby on June 16th, in support of an upcoming overland campaign by forces on the other side of the island.

Morale among the Rikko crews was exceptionally high after the initial victories across Southern Asia, remaining so until the Solomons. (rodswarbirds)

The loss of the four fleet carriers at Midway sent a shock through the entire Japanese war effort, and while it was not the fatal injury, or turning point, as it commonly seen, it forced a complete re-evaluation of how the war was being fought. In the shake up, many of the Rikko were redeployed, leaving the 4th and the Genzan Air Groups to continue the offensive at port Moresby. They would continue the bombing of Port Moresby, notably sinking the Australian transport ship Macdhui on the 18th of June. Air losses to enemy fighters were fairly light, as the bombers were given a considerable number of A6M fighters as escorts, and the night raiders met no meaningful resistance. Attrition was nonetheless an issue, as the Rikko were also tasked with the double duty of maritime patrols, which saw the men and machines of these units considerably overworked. While they had not demolished the Allied air forces in the region, the landing at Buna on the opposite side of the Island had succeeded, preparing the way for the Kokoda track campaign.

Concurrent with the operations to suppress Port Moresby were the raids on the city of Darwin, Australia, and its surrounding airfields. The first of these raids were unopposed, with the Takao Air Group flying over Western Australia in mid March. Their first encounter with enemy aircraft came on the 28th, during an unescorted raid by 7 G4Ms on the RAAF base at Darwin, which sent up a number of the American P-40E’s based there. They claimed one of the bombers, which returned the next day with nine A6M’s as escort, and bombed the airfield again without resistance. Hoping to keep up the pressure, the remaining aircraft of Takao Air Group returned from their mission in the Philippines, to the new base in Celebes. There they would launch the largest raid against Darwin on April 25th, with a force of 36 bombers and 15 fighters. This time however, the formation was met by a force of some 50 P-40’s, which claimed 6 bombers. In spite of these losses, they returned the next day with a strengthened 21 plane escort, seeing only the loss of one bomber. These raids saw a brief respite in May, before the Takao Air Group again made its appearance, bombing the city of Darwin with some 27 bombers on the 13th of June, suffering no losses. Having conducted the raid from a high altitude and with a large fighter escort, the P-40’s were unable to make the intercept. Losses remained low throughout the month, but given their position and strained resources, they switched to night bombing through the rest of the year.

Nocturnal nuisance raids remained the means of attack until March of the following year when the 753 Air Group launched a new series of daylight raids against Darwin. The first, launched on March 15, saw them target Darwin’s oil storage facilities with 19 G4Ms and 26 A6M’s. With the Australian air force having been substantially built up, the RAAF sent up a number of Spitfire Mk V’s. However, while they damaged some eight bombers, they suffered terrible casualties against the large escort force, and lost at least 14 of the new fighters. The IJN continued its assault on Darwin, focusing on its airbase, which had seen considerable build up. While they were generally successful against the RAAF bases at Darwin and Fenton, the slow accumulation of losses would see the last daylight raid flown on July 6th, 1943. The campaign was largely successful, as Darwin’s ability to host any significant naval forces was gone given its continued vulnerability to air attack, and the loss of its fuel stores.

Guadalcanal

With their homes now a warzone, these Papuan men became auxiliaries for the IJN (ww2incolor)

The loss of the fleet carriers Akagi, Kaga, Hiryu, and Soryu represented a grave loss for the Japanese Navy. However, it was not the decisive battle to end the war, as apart from the catastrophic loss of these ships and their airgroups, the IJN still possessed considerable offensive strength. The two most formidable IJN carriers remained, Shokaku and Zuikaku, and they were supplemented by the smaller fleet carriers Junyo and Hiyo, along with four light carriers.The IJN also retained its potent land based air arm. Against them were the American USS Enterprise, Saratoga, Hornet, and the smaller USS Wasp, along with a number of small escort carriers. While the United States could more than replace its losses the next year, if they suffered disastrous losses, like the one the Japanese Navy experienced at Midway, it could jeopardize Allied positions across the Pacific.

The area of greatest concern was the South Pacific, as while Port Moresby was still firmly in Allied hands, the Japanese Naval anchorage at Rabaul gave them control of the waters north of New Guinea. The Rabaul anchorage also proved a means of projecting force at the very edge of the Empire’s territory, which was soon to claim the otherwise unremarkable islands of Tulagi and Guadalcanal. In June, Japanese forces landed on these islands, and began the construction of an airfield on Guadalcanal. If completed, this outpost would give the Japanese Navy a powerful strategic position, allowing them to harass sea lines of communication from America to Australia. In a worst case scenario for the Allies, it could negate Australia as a position to build up forces for any major operation in the South Pacific. It would endanger the current operations to hold New Guinea, and force the main theater of the war from the Southern to central Pacific, where the Japanese Navy still held an advantage.

Before the completion of the airfield, the US Navy staged an amphibious assault with the First Marine Division going ashore on August 7th, with the support of a cruiser task force, the carriers USS Enterprise and Saratoga, and a screening force of sea planes for reconnaissance. This news came as a shock to the Japanese forces at Rabaul, with the first major response being a hastily assembled air raid of G4Ms of Rabaul’s 4th Air Groups. With such short notice, the Rikko were sent out with an armament of bombs, rather than switching to torpedoes before the 560 nautical mile flight. They flew out under the command of Lt. Egawa Renpei, a non-pilot officer, with 18 A6M fighters as escort, with one abort.

G4Ms of the Misawa Air Group (rodswarbirds)

The raiders were discovered first by coastwatchers, followed by USS Saratoga’s air search radar at 11:50. F4F wildcats from Enterprise and Saratoga were scrambled to meet them at 10,000ft. They met the bombers as they lined up on the cruiser task force, unaware of the presence of the American carriers. Under some disruption from the escorts, the Wildcats claimed two bombers outright, damaging another two which were lost to ditching. The raiders failed to claim any serious damage, and returned to Rabaul to prepare for an attack the following day. The 4th Air Group sortied 17 G4Ms under the command of Lt. Ikeda Hiromi, and were joined by a further 9 from the Misawa Air Group, for a torpedo attack on the American vessels at Guadalcanal. After several aborts, 23 planes flew to the target, joined by 15 A6M fighters.

With the American carriers having eluded Japanese reconnaissance efforts, the formation thus decided to attack the forces at the Guadalcanal beachhead. There they were met with a torrent of defensive fire from the task force’s cruisers and destroyers, and several wildcats from Saratoga and Enterprise. Only one torpedo found its mark in the destroyer USS Jarvis, and Lieutenant Junior Grade Takafumi Sasaki flew his fatally damaged bomber into the transport USS George F. Elliot, with the ensuing fire consuming much of the ship. In return, American forces would end up decimating the raiding force, which returned home with only five bombers and none of its officers, which would mark the highest losses for the entire campaign. Following the battle, the USS Jarvis would be found and sunk with all hands by patrolling G4Ms, and the George F. Elliot would be scuttled, its damage being too extensive to save the ship.

The Rikko pilots carried out attacks at extremely low altitudes, though often only the best of them would carry out the attack until the last possible moment. (WW2DBase)

The failure of the raid can be placed on the improved air defenses of American vessels, now mounting a considerable number of the 40mm Bofors guns capable of throwing out an enormous volume of fire, the presence of American fighter planes flown by aviators who had learned to fight the Zero, and also the decline of expertise of Japanese aircrews. One officer aboard the USS Astoria remarked that the Rikko of the 4th and Misawa air groups lacked the tenacity he’d seen in early battles, stating, “I’ve never seen them that bad before. Those crack Jap Navy pilots, the ones we tangled with in the Coral Sea, and at Midway–they don’t let up. Never. They come right at you, and they keep on coming until you get them or they get you. These punks–running away…”

While they had not faced the losses like the carrier based forces at Midway, casualty rates had been steady across the Southern Asian and Australian front, and the overly selective pilot training programs were now forcing these schools to rush students through to the Navy to try and meet demand. Pilots that went down in Rikko were also difficult to recover in the best cases, as their missions often took them to the limits of their own territory. In the case of the raid on October 8, 1942, those pilots who did survive took their own lives when the US Navy attempted to recover them. In the weeks to follow, many Rikko crews would refuse to bring parachutes, choosing to die, rather than bail out over enemy territory.

The day after the disastrous raid, a Japanese cruiser force would reach Guadalcanal, and in a night raid, destroy all but one of the American cruisers, and force the retreat of the amphibious forces, which had not had enough time to unload their cargo. The battle for Guadalcanal thus began in earnest, with the remote island being held by the First Marine Division against the Japanese 17th Army under Lt. Gen. Hyakutake Harukichi. Both sides were isolated on Guadalcanal, as the Japanese stronghold of Rabaul was nearly as distant as the American base at New Hebrides. The environment would prove dangerous, with malaria, dysentery, and dengue fever capable of sapping the strength of entire units, and the supply situation being so poor that some Japanese soldiers would begin calling Guadalcanal “Starvation Island”.

The Rikko would prove one of the only means of putting pressure on the now completed American airfield on the island, named Henderson for a pilot who had died at Midway. The naval air forces at Rabaul were also built up with the addition of the Kisarazu Air Group. Over the next few weeks, the assembled bombers would strike out at Henderson, with the first major raid comprising 23 planes against the airfield on August 25, suffering no losses of their own, as the American fighters were being used for ground support missions and were being rearmed when the bombers arrived. The next day, the Rikko returned with a strength of 16 planes under the command of Lt. Nakamura. Though suffering the total loss of two bombers, and two forced landings, the attack dealt a painful setback to the fledgling ‘Cactus Air Force’ at Henderson, as the bombers had torched 2000 gallons of avgas, and secondary munitions explosions damaged a number of planes. While they had escorts during these missions, the A6M’s had severe radio trouble due to their sets operating too close to the frequency of the faint radio emissions from their engine’s spark plugs. The fighter pilots typically opted to remove the troublesome sets to increase the range of their planes, but their situational awareness suffered accordingly.

 

The sheer size of the Solomon theater put the A6M’s endurance to the test. Most of the Rabaul Zeros had their radio sets removed due to onboard interference, and to further lighten the aircraft. Note the absence of the antenna aft of the cockpit (ww2db)

The raids would continue on a near daily basis, apart from a diversion to chase shipping around the area. For the most part, Guadalcanal was isolated, save for fast transports and deliveries by air. The Rikko claimed one of these transports on August 30th, sinking the USS Colhoun with a pattern of bombs. Heavy raids continued into September to support the Army on the Island, which would attempt to overrun the American positions in a night assault on the night of September 13-14. Defeated, the Imperial General Headquarters would reiterate that Guadalcanal was to be captured at any cost and placed more resources towards reclaiming the island. For the Rikko, this came in the form of two more Air Groups, the Kanoya and Takao, which had both arrived by the 23rd. This allowed them to rotate out the exhausted units at Rabaul, and continue the assault on Henderson.

Henderson however, had also seen some improvements. The Cactus Air Force was reinforced by USS Saratoga’s fighter squadrons while their carrier was sent away for repairs following an attack by Japanese Submarine I-26. They also had a new SCR 270 air search radar, set up in early September. They thus had a considerable number of Wildcats, and the ability to scramble them in time to the 8 km altitude the G4M’s flew. However, the radar system wasn’t perfect and could prove sensitive to the conditions on the ground. Sustained losses among the Rabaul’s squadrons grew considerably compared to earlier efforts. Naturally, daylight raids became less frequent, though they were still occasionally conducted and would inflict serious damage. On October 11th, a Japanese raiding force of 45 G4Ms under the command of Lt. Cdr. Nishioka Kazuo, departed to Henderson amidst poor weather. Several aircraft fell out due to the weather, but the remaining aircraft split into two units. As the first unit had completed its attack, the second made its way to Henderson and caught a dozen wildcats on the ground. They would return on the 13th, with Lt Makino Shigeji leading a 25 bomber raid on Henderson, this time failing to be intercepted due to weather obscuring the coast watchers. His force would set fire to a fuel depot, and destroy a B-17 on the ground.

The Kanoya Air Group was committed to the battle for Guadalcanal, during this deployment its fighter and bomber groups were divided, with the G4M1 units forming the 751st Air Group. (sdasm)

Night raids had begun in late August, and proceeded almost without end for a month. These were typically a single aircraft tasked with dropping a string of bombs on Henderson, with the intention of being disruptive, more than dangerous. As the conditions of the planes worsened, their engines began to grow desynchronized, leading to the aircraft making a terrible noise, earning these raiders the nickname ‘Washing Machine Charlie’. Contrary to popular myth, this sound was not intentionally created by mechanics tampering with the aircraft, the planes were simply badly worn out.

Fatigue, both of the air crews, and their equipment, resulted in the Rikko units being stood down for a time. Even with the reinforcements they had received, they had been pulling the quadruple duties of maritime patrol, anti-shipping, high altitude bombing, and night raider. From Rabaul to Henderson was about 565 nautical miles, which made for a flight time of about 6 hours. Near daily activity had rendered these units almost unserviceable.

The last major naval strike since the initial raid on the Guadalcanal came on November 12. Having detected a convoy of American ships, 19 G4Ms were sortied under the command of Lt. Cdr. Nakamura Tomo-o, who had an escort of 30 A6Ms. Led by Rear Adm. Daniel J. Callaghan, aboard the heavy cruiser San Francisco, Task Group 67.4 was primarily concerned with the presence of Japanese battleships in the area, but the air search radar on Guadalcanal informed them of an impending Japanese air attack. Detecting the force from over 100 miles away, they were able to vector a number of Cactus Air Force F4F and P-39 fighters to cover the formation.

Lt. Cdr. Nakamura brought in his formation just below the cloud cover, and after dividing his force into two units, sent them in after the American ships. As they did so, 16 American fighters rushed to intercept them. Keeping to almost wavetop height, the Rikko would attempt to press the attack while under heavy fire from the assembled American warships, and the enemy fighters which chased them frantically just over the sea. One unidentified F4F pilot went as far as resorting to ramming one of the bombers after his ammunition was expended.

Unlike the aviators that struck Repulse and Prince of Whales, many of the less experienced airmen were shaken by the volume of fire, and broke off their attacks as they closed in. None of the torpedoes hit their mark, but the pilot of one fatally damaged bomber chose to fly his plane into the USS San Francisco, rather than attempt to ditch on Guadalcanal. Anonymously, he flew his plane into the cruiser’s mainmast, the wreckage swinging over after impact, its pulverized engine and wing spilling burning avgas across the ship. The flames had spilled into the main battery director, and wrought havoc across the aft decks. In the end the fires were brought under control, but not before 22 lives were lost and further 22 were seriously injured.

USS San Francisco survived the air attack and played a crucial role in the first night of the Naval Battle of Guadalcanal the evening after the plane attack. It also suffered a good deal of friendly fire from another American cruiser. (USN)

Despite the Japanese aircrew having discarded their parachutes, committing themselves to death before capture over enemy territory, a number of survivors emerged from the wreckage of the low level planes. As boats were sent out to recover them, a bewildering series of encounters awaited them. One gunner aboard a floating wreck began firing on a nearby US destroyer in a very short encounter, an enraged petty officer aboard the USS Barton ignored the orders of his skipper and gunned down a dazed pilot climbing from a wreck, and one rescue team attempted to bring aboard a young airman, only to be prevented by his superior who shot him before turning the gun on himself. Of the 19 planes that were sent on the raid, only two returned to Rabaul in working order, two crews crash landed on Guadalcanal and later returned, and three others ditched in friendly territory. In all, 10 of the 19 crews were lost outright in one of the harshest engagements the campaign had seen. This all but decimated Rabaul’s attack force, leaving 3 of its 4 air groups in tatters.

Solomons

The greatest advantage of the G4M1 lay in its incredible range, but the sheer distance from Rabaul to the Southern Solomons proved grueling for near daily operation. (Dennis Burns)

The attempts to take the island of Guadalcanal failed, with the last major land battle occurring in late October, 1942. The now wearied Japanese Army clung to the South Western corner of the Island, where destroyers acting as fast transports left oil drums full of supplies, and brought in a trickle of reinforcements. At sea, the Japanese Navy had begun the campaign with a stunning victory off Savo Island, but in the months following, had lost the battleships Hiei and Kirishima in gun battles off the coast of Guadalcanal. Yet, they had managed to sink the American carriers, Hornet, Wasp, and critically damaged Enterprise, leaving Saratoga as the only American fleet carrier in the Pacific for some time. In return, they suffered the loss of the light carrier Ryujo, and the fleet carrier Shokaku had been seriously damaged, worse though, was the loss of experienced aircrews which the Navy’s training programs were struggling to replace. These victories would not be enough without Guadalcanal, the capture of which could have proven a decisive blow against the supply lines and, crucially, morale of American forces in the Pacific.

The Imperial Army Headquarters would finally admit the loss of Gudalcanal several weeks after the end of any serious engagements on the island, on December 31, 1942. The next year would see the American forces march further north in the Solomons, where they had once only had a foot hold. For the most part, the heaviest forces on both sides were spent, and USS Saratoga was too valuable to lose. It thus fell on the cruiser and destroyer forces to continue the battle for the Solomons. For the Japanese Navy, which had suffered the loss of a number of its heavier warships, it was hoped that the Rikko could partially take up their offensive ability.

During this time, raids to support the Army in New Guinea, to inflict losses on the Allied air base at Milne Bay, and nightly nuisance raids across the theater were carried out. Major daylight raids became very rare following last year’s losses, though this isn’t to say none achieved major success. One 23 bomber raid on January 17th destroyed numerous aircraft on the ground at Milne Bay, with no losses sustained. Regardless, some tactics were sworn off as far too costly, namely daylight torpedo attack missions. The combination of improved anti-air armaments on American ships, the slow, level approach of attacking planes, and the ever more present threat of fighters, thanks to early warning radar, made daylight attacks a costly, futile affair.

A switch to night attacks brought dangers of its own, but given the high level of blind flying ability of the more veteran Rikko crews, it was far from suicidal. They would soon prove their abilities on the night of 29/30 January, after a sizable force of American warships was spotted near Rennell Island. The force in question was a task force consisting of the heavy cruisers USS Wichita, USS Louisville, and USS Chicago, the only surviving cruiser of the ill fated battle of Savo Island at the beginning of the Guadalcanal campaign. They were joined by two escort carriers, three light cruisers, and six destroyers. However, the green commander of the force Rear Adm. Robert Giffen had steamed ahead of his slower escort carriers in order to make a timely rendezvous with a number of destroyers, before reaching Guadalcanal.

Lt. Cdr. Nakamura commanded the G4M’s sorties against this fleet, comprising a mostly veteran force from the 705th Air Group, and was joined by 15 older G3M bombers from the 701st. Departing before dusk, Nakamura led the formation against TF 18. The bombers of the 705th made their attack at 19:19 hours, in dim light. The G4Ms made their attack free of interruption from enemy aircraft, but failed to score any hits. They had lost only one aircraft in the attack, which was remarkable as this battle marked one of the first uses of radar fused, proximity shells aboard American warships. At 19:38, the second force, composed of the older G3M bombers undertook their attack in darkness, with a spotter aircraft dropping a string of flares over the American fleet. The string of flares was dropped in the heading of the force, colored coded to denote the types of ships. Against the light of the flares, the 701’s planes went in. USS Chicago found itself in the sights of Lt. Cdr. Higai Joji’s flight, and after downing one of his ‘Nells’ on a torpedo run, the burning, floating wreck of the bomber now illuminated the cruiser.

USS Chicago found itself at the center of the enemy attack, with the oncoming bombers scoring two hits, one hitting the after engine space and disabling three of its four propeller shafts and flooding its turbogenerators, and another striking the forward engine room destroying the remaining active shaft, leaving the cruiser dead in the water. Swift damage control efforts set flooding boundaries and allowed the crew to save the ship for the time being. For the heavily damaged cruiser, two of Lt. Cdr. Higai’s aircrews were lost, including the veteran commander himself. However, the engagement was not yet over, as Rikko were now aware of the survival of the stricken cruiser and sought to finish it.

The task of sinking the USS Chicago lay with the 751 Air Group, a unit now composed mostly of new crews, who lacked the skills needed for the night attack the evening before. Nonetheless, they sortied 11 G4M’s under the command of Lt. Cdr. Nishioka. They found the USS Chicago under tow by the fleet tug USS Najavo at 16:10. Under escort from the other warships and F4F’s from VF-10, two of the bombers were lost before the run. However, the remaining aircraft pressed the attack and put four more torpedoes into the cruiser, with the four surviving bombers departing at as best a speed as they could make. Surveying the damage, it was immediately clear that the Chicago could not be saved, and the Navajo was ordered to cut its line. Some 20 minutes after the attack, the cruiser capsized, with the attacks having claimed 62 men. The destroyer USS La Vallette was also hit, though damage control efforts saved the ship, then taken in tow by the then available USS Navajo.

Through 1943 the fragility of the G4M1 became ever more apparent, but with no replacement in sight, and the desperation of the Navy’s position in the South Pacific, it remained an essential tool against the Allies.(SDASM)

While the battle of Rennell island again demonstrated the lethality of the Rikko, it was again another sign that daylight usage of the aircraft could not be continued without significant losses. It was also indicative of a growing problem that had now reached a tipping point, one that was being felt across all of Japan’s air forces. A vast gap in ability between the fresh and veteran aircrews was not only being felt in the capability of their units, but was forcing restrictions on mission planning. The inability for new crews to even perform the same tasks as the veterans in theater would not only prevent them from embarking on the same missions together, but would leave them relegated to more dangerous missions, unable to fly under the cover of darkness.

I-Go and the Death of the Admiral

Wishing to avoid an entirely defensive campaign, Adm. Yamamoto would commit his South Eastern forces to an offensive to shore up the position of Rabaul, and its defensive circle from Bougainville to New Guinea. In this offensive, carrier air groups were based alongside their ground based counterparts for attacks on enemy shipping and air bases through the region. The Rikko, with new replacements, were to take a center role in the offensive and resumed raids against Port Moresby. Despite only modest damage being inflicted across the theater, the operation was judged a success.

Admiral Yamamoto Isoroku salutes gathered airmen at Rabaul, shortly after this meeting he would board a G4M1 bomber to survey his forces on a nearby island. (Wikimedia)

It was to be entirely overshadowed by what was supposed to be a typical inspection of frontline positions. Adm. Yamamoto and members of his staff boarded a pair of G4M’s to view their positions on Balalle from the air. Not expecting to encounter any enemy forces, the pair of bombers flew to the island with a modest escort of six A6M fighters. Unbeknownst to them, American code breaking efforts had succeeded in discerning the Admiral’s plans, and 18 P-38G fighters were in route. Coming upon the flight, they ignored the fighters and went straight for the bombers before withdrawing. Overwhelmed, the escorts brought down only one of P-38’s that day, with both G4M’s being shot down.

Veteran pilot FPO1/c Tanimura Hiroaki was able to bring the second plane to the beach below in one piece, saving the lives of his crew, Vice Adm. Ugaki Matome, and Yamamoto’ chief of staff. However, the first aircraft was riddled with bullets and went down out of control, with the Admiral being struck with gunfire at the start of the attack.

The Admiral’s wrecked aircraft after its descent into the jungle. (warhistoryonline)

The loss of Yamamoto was not the blow as it has often been remarked, indeed, he was a keen strategist, but one that had made his fare share of mistakes. His talents could never have been relied upon to salvage the then rapidly deteriorating Japanese position across the Pacific. However, the lack of a central figure with his prestige meant that the war would be directed by officers that often did not fight the war according to a single, realistic plan. The Admiral’s passing was a key point in the war, marking the definitive end of the period where a strategy was pursued with clear aims that might bring the Allies to the negotiating table. It was a purely attritional battle now, one that they were not prepared to fight, and with no plan beyond hoping to outlast their enemies.

Clinging On

With the loss of Admiral Yamamoto and the retreat from Guadalcanal, the Japanese Navy was now on the backfoot. It still possessed a number of carriers, but the quality of their aircrews had declined considerably, and the American carrier force was being introduced to the new Essex class, along with the excellent new F6F fighter. These new carriers were arguably the most capable of any class produced during the war, with 7 being commissioned in 1943 alone, a figure larger than America’s entire complement of pre-war fleet carriers.

Rather than assault the stronghold of Rabaul directly, American and Australian forces moved to cut them off to the West and South. (campaigns of the pacific war)

Despite the losses borne earlier in the year, new Rikko units were deployed to bases in New Guinea and the Solomon islands, with training programs rushing to help cope with a now permanent shortage in personnel. By mid 1943, they were typically being used only for maritime patrol missions, with the Allied air presence across New Guinea and the Solomons having been considerably strengthened. Aided by the introduction of new models of fighters in the theater, like the F4U-1 Corsair, the P-40F, and P-38G, they were now ever more confident in their control of the air. They were thus able to deal serious blows to Japanese raiding forces, and were able to cover their own raiders with the long range P-38. Extremely high losses among the Japanese Naval Aviators had also seen a shift in strength across the theater that now saw the Army Air Force shouldering the majority of effort in the theater.

As the American forces climbed ever northward in the Solomon Islands, the Rikko were again called upon to help shut down their advance. Near the end of June, a major amphibious landing was threatening forces around New Georgia, and 26 G4Ms under the command of Lt. Cdr. Nakamura Genzo were sortied to attack the assembled task force. They located the fleet between Rendova and New Georgia, and found it covered by F4F and F4U fighters. Regardless, they pressed their attack with 10 bombers making their way to the fleet. They would succeed in putting one torpedo into the transport USS McCawley. It exploded in the engine room, killing 15 and cutting power to the ship, which would remain afloat until being mistakenly torpedoed by friendly PT boats later that evening. Casualties among the Rikko were again exceedingly high, with 19 planes being lost.

The American advance to New Georgia, and soon Vella La Vella, would enable them to base aircraft in a far more northern position in the Solomons. This directly threatened the Japanese air bases, Army and Navy, on the Southern and Northern ends of Bougainville, the largest and northernmost island in the Solomons. The Rikko were directed to support ground operations, bombing enemy field positions in daylight raids, and despite the considerable presence of their own fighters, casualties soon became too heavy, and after a raid on the 15th of July, were called off.

Recuperation lasted as long as September, when Allied landings along Northern New Guinea threatened the important air base at Lae, which covered oversea communication with New Guinea and the stronghold of Rabaul. The Rikko were sent to raid shipping in the area to stifle the invasion, but through the month achieved little damage. Their tactics were largely switched to anti-ship level bombing, which saw significantly lower casualties but little success, until the end of the month when desperation forced them to launch a daylight torpedo attack. Of the 8 planes sent to attack the landing forces at Finschhafen, only one returned to base with another aircraft ditching, with no hits being reported to any allied ships.

The encirclement of Rabaul had begun in earnest and it would suffer a major air raid on November 3rd, and in retaliation, Admiral Koga Mineichi would order an anti-shipping operation that would include a deployment of carrier air groups to aid their strained land-based counterparts. The Rikko would begin the offensive with a night attack on US shipping around Bougainville on November 8th. A composite flight of G4Ms from the 702nd and 751st Air Groups were committed to a night attack against the forces that had recently landed American forces on Bougainville. They would be joined by carrier based bombers in the attack, and succeeded in torpedoing the light cruiser USS Birmingham, smashing a 30 foot hole in its hull, aft of its chain locker. Regardless of a near miss from a dive bomber, a torpedo strike, and a second bomb which struck turret no. 4, Birmingham’s crew raced to stop the flooding and succeeded miraculously. In spite of the beating, the cruiser could still make a speed of 30 kts, allowing them to keep up with the rest of the formation, and avoiding the fate of the USS Chicago. Only two crewmen were killed in the attack, though many more were injured.

By 1943 the A6M was growing increasingly obsolescent. Designed around a light, low power engine, it had limited capacity for improvement. Against new American models, some exceeding 2000hp, it was at a decided disadvantage. (SDASM)

In spite of the cover of darkness, losses among the Japanese forces were high, with 7 G4Ms being lost. Much improved gunnery from the American ships was showing that advancements in radar direction, proximity fusing, and training, enabled them to match the feats of the night torpedo bombers. At 19:58 hours, USS Birmingham used its 5 inch gun battery to down a single G4M engaged in illuminating the task force at a range of 14,000 yards. Worse for the Rikko was that while some of the new crews were proficient enough in low light flying for night attacks, they could still find themselves overwhelmed when committing to the final run of the attack.

Rikko sorties continued the following days, with fewer losses, but also marginal success. On the night of November 12/13, the Rikko attacked Task Force 39 in 04:53 in the early morning. Three G4Ms were able to box-in the light cruiser USS Denver in a hammer and anvil attack, scoring a hit. Struck along the starboard aft engine room, Denver quickly lost propulsion and took on a 15 degree list. As damage control efforts continued, the cruiser was brought under fighter protection at six in the morning, and was able to retreat to safety. Two of the three Rikko that attacked the cruiser were shot down, with the successful strike being made by Lt(jg) Maruyama Hidezumi, whose plane returned home with 380 holes in it.

Another major attack was launched on the night of 16/17. During this sortie, SFPO Kobayashi Gintaro would succeed in torpedoing the USS McKean, a destroyer being employed as a high speed troop transport. When attempts to evade the torpedo failed, it struck starboard, aft of the rear magazine, which caused an explosion that cast burning fuel oil across much of the ship and the water around it. Sinking at the stern, the order to abandon ship was called well before the explosion of the ship’s magazines. Sixty four sailors lost their lives, along with a further 52 marines, with the survivors picked up by the other destroyers of the force.

These attacks imposed some losses against the forces invading Bougainville, but they were unable to stop the northern stream of American forces that were soon to capture the southern flank of Rabaul. Regardless of the extreme overclaiming of the Rikko crew, they were unable to deal significant damage to the amphibious forces, and were themselves taking serious losses in operations, which earlier that year, had guaranteed a good deal of safety. Eventually, the forces in Rabaul would be encircled and subjected to attack from attacks from the South and the West, before American carrier forces returned to the region in strength to deal an even greater blow. During this period, only the Rikko of the 751st remained in theater, but after a massive air raid in February of 1944, the remaining forces withdrew.

The Retreat

While 1943 lacked the intensive surface battles of the previous year, and saw no new major aircraft carrier engagements, it represented a string of serioust defeats for the Japanese Army and Navy. By year’s end, they had completely lost the ability to threaten the sea lines of communication from Australia to America, and thus any major strategic position that could threaten the ability of the Allies to continue the war in the South Pacific. Worse, they were now fighting a lost battle to retain control of Rabaul, with New Guinea being remarked as a hell on Earth from which men did not return, and their positions in the Gilbert and Marshall Islands now being reduced to the outposts of Kwajalein, Enwitok, and Truk. The central pacific strategy was also non-viable, as the American carrier forces had been more than rebuilt, and had a year to build up their air groups, now flying the F6F fighter as the fleet’s standard, which was now more than a match for the A6M. Even moresow, now that Japan’s veteran naval airmen were either lost, or rotated out. This would leave all remaining air-fleet engagements extremely one sided.

The Rikko played a minor role in defending the Gilberts and Marshalls, apart from the base at Truk. At the beginning of 1944, this anchorage would find itself under attack numerous times by American carrier forces. The greatest blow came on February 17th and 18th, when it came under major air attack. Under siege from five American fleet carriers, the operation would thoroughly wreck the Japanese Navy’s air presence in the region, and prove that the anchorage was too vulnerable for any major use in the future. While there was largely very little the forces in the region could do against the American forces, one G4M flying from Tinian would make a solo night attack against the fleet carrier Intrepid.

This single plane managed to evade attention and make its attack against the carrier. The torpedo exploded 15 feet below the waterline, causing flooding, and jamming its rudder to port. Navigationally impaired, the crew had to fashion a sail to steer the ship back to Pearl Harbor for several months of repairs.

Now well established, the Allies conducted raids across New Guinea and the Solomons. Here an A-20G attacks grounded aircraft at Lae 1943. (ww2db)

Future attacks would take this form, as these night missions were less likely to be detected, and the pool of aviators who could actually carry out these attacks remained small. In the early months of 1944, the Rikko continued to make these attacks in piecemeal throughout the Pacific in response to the ever growing offensive on the part of the American Navy. The naval bombers also made their attacks in response to major landing efforts at Biak and Palau, while also making opportunistic bombing raids, such as one on June 5th against the airfield at Wakde island. There, a pair of G4Ms of the 753rd Airgroup destroyed six aircraft and damaged 80 more at the crowded air base, with a follow up attack hitting the base with three bombers on the 8th. However, for the most part, the effectiveness of most of these operations were indeterminate, as the scale of their operations diminished.

They also found themselves fighting more determined resistance in the air at night, as the USAAF and the Navy had advanced their own night fighter programs. Over Guadalcanal, the USAAF would first employ the P-70, a thoroughly disappointing conversion of the A-20 attack plane into the night fighter role. It had neither the speed, nor service ceiling, to catch a G4M at the 7km they typically flew during their nuisance raids over Henderson, and only one or two kills were made with this model over the course of the war. Frustrated with the P-70, Henderson resorted to using searchlight guided P-38G’s, and even modified some aircraft to carry an air search radar in a modified fuel tank. The pilot workload of the P-38G was already considered burdensome by many pilots, and the new device only worsened the situation. Greater success was found with the Marine’s converted Lockheed Ventura night fighters in the convoy defense role, but it wasn’t until the deployment of the P-61 in late 1943 that the G4Ms could effectively be pursued at night. Several dozen victory credits were tallied on the P-61, with two of the six aces made on the model being in the Pacific theater.

The US Navy’s solution to night torpedo attacks came in a more convenient form, as radar equipped models of existing carrier fighters. These were initially F6F-3N Hellcats, which placed an air search radar on the wing, which they would use in the final approach to the target after being vectored in by a supporting ship. Later models would become available, with more powerful engines, and a pair of 20mm cannons supplementing their .50 caliber guns. Marine and Naval aviators would shoot down considerably more aircraft than their land based counterparts, though fewer of them were G4Ms, with the majority being light patrol aircraft being used to track American warships at night. As was the case with American improvements in radar directed gunnery, the presence of these advanced night fighters made the Rikko’s night attack missions considerably more dangerous.

Replacement

The G4M1 Model 11 had served well past its prime, and was relieved by the improved G4M2 Model 22. The new model had Kasei Model 21 engines, which were rated at 1850 hp, with water injection. It had a new wing incorporating laminar flow research, increasing its size and fuel capacity, without increasing drag. However, it did not receive additional protection to its fuel tanks, nor did it implement anything more than token protection for its crew. Its defensiveness was somewhat improved by the installation of an additional 20mm machine gun in a powered dorsal turret, replacing the top 7.7mm machine gun mount. Later models carried the Type 3 Ku Mark 6 search radar, to allow for better target acquisition on night torpedo raids.

The G4M2 is easily distinguished by its elliptical vertical stabilizer tip, the expanded nose glazing, and powered turret, which isn’t visible from this angle. (ww2db)

The old G4M1 machines were considered old and outdated, both by Americans, and the Japanese Navy itself. The airframe itself was also somewhat dated, but better engines had improved its performance, and it was being supplemented by a lighter twin engine torpedo bomber, the P1Y Ginga, or Galaxy. Nevertheless, the Japanese position in the war was irrecoverable. The Japanese assembled carrier forces would be decimated by the loss of so many airmen in the battle of the Philippine sea, and leave the navy without a coherent strategy. The battle for the Philippines would be fought without a strategy that could even hope to bring victory. Even in the planning stage, it was evident that the remaining Japanese Naval forces could not hope to prevent an American amphibious operation in the Philippines, and they would only arrive well after the invasion force had disembarked all of its forces and cargo. With no hope of actually preventing the invasion, or claiming a victory of any strategic importance, the remainder of Japan’s Naval strength was sacrificed at Leyte Gulf.

1945 was a bleak year that saw the near collapse of Japanese society. In this last year of the war, a new model G4M3 was produced, in order to serve as a host aircraft for a rocket propelled kamikaze aircraft. It reflected the futile stubbornness of those who lead the country, with the military unwilling to terminate the war until it faced a near total blockade of the home islands, the loss of the USSR as a possible intermediary for negotiating the end of the war when it invaded Manchuria, the firebombing of most major cities, and the atomic bombing of two.

Peace

One of the Bataan flights taxis alongside guards. (ww2db)

In an unlikely coincidence, the G4M1 would play a role in ending the war that it had been engaged in since the first salvos. A renovated G4M1, and a transport model of a converted G6M heavy fighter, were selected to ferry the Japanese delegation to the base at Ie Shima. Under direction from Gen. Douglas McArthur, both planes were painted white, and marked with dark green capitulation crosses, so as to make them unmistakable. They also flew under the names Bataan 1 & 2, in remembrance of the first major battle between the US and Japanese Armies, and the forced march inflicted on the Allied troops.

A veteran pilot, Lt. Sudo Den of the Yokosuka airgroup, was selected to lead the delegation to Ie Shima. They departed Kisarazu on August 19th, and were joined by a pair of American B-25 Mitchells of the 345 Bomber Group, and a B-17H search and rescue plane. The trip went without issue, and Lt. Gen. Kawabe Torashiro and the other 15 delegates deplaned, and boarded a Douglas C-54, which would fly them to Manila. With the war over, they returned via the same track, but with Bataan 1 undergoing maintenance, they all boarded the G6M. In spite of a forced landing near the Tenryu river due to a fuel leak, the delegation made it home safely.

The final service of the G4M was in dispersing the remaining Rikko air and ground crew. It was on August 23 that the remaining serviceable Rikko were assembled at Komatsu. From there, the planes flew across Japan to deliver the former air and ground crews to airfields where they could make the last leg of their journeys home.

In spite of the high losses incurred by these units for much of the war, there were a number of aviators who had survived the entirety of the conflict. Perhaps the longest serving of them was Lt(jg) Tsuneo Otake, who had begun his service in the older G3M over China, before transferring to the Genzan Air Group, where he participated in the campaign over Guadalcanal until he returned back to Japan in May of the following year. From there he joined a transport squadron flying the G6M. By the war’s end he had flown 3022 sorties and accumulated 5255 flight hours. Another veteran was Lieutenant, later Captain, Haruki Iki. Capt. Iki was a veteran of the attack on Force Z, and dropped a bouquet of flowers in remembrance for those lost in the days after the battle. He was also among those who survived the war, and would go on to start an association for Rikko veterans.

Handling Characteristics and Tactics

As a design that was borne out of extreme compromises, the G4M nevertheless proved an easy aircraft to fly. It was easily controllable, even in bad conditions, and very stable, presenting a lighter workload for the pilot. Both of these would prove essential for an aircraft designed to fly over exceptionally long distances, and from bases that would be plagued with poor weather. Overall, pilots regarded the flight characteristics of the G4M as dependable. The only major drawback to the design’s airworthiness was the lack of feathering propellers, which made bringing the aircraft back a more strenuous job that required considerably more corrective flying to cope with the increased drag.

Under non-combat flight conditions, there were five members of the crew seated in the cockpit. The captain, navigator, and radioman pulled double duty as gunners. (9gag)

Protection was very poor. The only armor plate aboard the plane protected the ammunition for the 20mm, and was judged to be so useless that it was almost universally removed from the plane. All members of the crew were vulnerable to gunfire, which given the near universality of .50 caliber guns among American fighters, proved deadly. Worse was the lack of fuel tank protection, or self sealing containers. These aircraft were equipped with CO2 flushed atmospheres beside the wing fuel stores, and CO2 extinguishers, but these proved unreliable in combating fuel fires. Later aircraft were given rubber sheeting on the underside the wings to give some degree of self sealing protection from flak and ground fire, but provided no protection from enemy aircraft. Ironically, structurally the aircraft proved very durable thanks to its forward fuselage and wings built as a single unit. It was fairly common for aircraft to come home on one engine or in extreme states of damage, just so long as there were no fuel tank fires.

Most of the defensive guns were not particularly effective at defending the aircraft. None of the gun positions were powered, and the forward 7.7mm machine gun had a very limited angle of traverse, in addition to proving difficult to move against the air stream. The rear gunner position was the exception, and featured a 20mm machine gun. It was called a machine gun as this was a naval aircraft, and the IJN considered the 20mm a small cartridge compared to some of the others in their inventory. This weapon could seriously damage a trailing fighter, but was somewhat restricted by its use of a drum magazine, the reloading of which was quite cumbersome.

The aircraft was often called ‘Hamaki’ by its crews, over its cylindrical fuselage, though it carried a darker double meaning when the aircraft’s flammability began to become well known. Subsequent names like ‘one shot lighter’ or ‘flying lighter’ accumulated as its service continued through 1942. The official American callsign for the aircraft was “Betty”.

The aircraft was employed in many roles, as a level bomber, torpedo bomber, maritime patrol plane, photo reconnaissance aircraft, and transport. The typical combat deployment was the Kokutai, or Air Group. The airgroup itself was the Hikotai, led by its Hikotaisho, and supported by its Hikokai, which represented all of the ground based personnel and equipment, which included transport aircraft. An air group’s command staff was a distinct element, not considered part of its Hikokai. Each Hikotai comprised up to 27 planes, with an airgroup capable of fielding multiple, and not needing to be of the same model, such that some units operated both bombers and fighters. In March 1944, the Hikotai were given much broader autonomy and were capable of deploying to bases distant from their original ground based Kokutai staff and ground crew, and attaching themselves to ground based services in areas they were redeployed to.

The largest combat formation was composed of 3, nine plane Chutai, which were themselves composed of 3, three plane Shotai. In combat, these units could be broken down into whatever size formation was needed. During torpedo attacks, the shotai would be divided into their own sections and could be used to attack a target from multiple directions, preventing them from evading. At a larger level, Chutai would conduct attacks separately, waiting to see the results of proceeding attacks, before choosing and committing a target based on the damage they’d taken.

Construction

Bulkhead diagram (G4M1 Manual)

The G4M1 Model 11, was a multipurpose twin engine bomber, and was an all metal, mid wing design. Its semi-monocoque fuselage was built as two halves, joined at the 24th bulkhead for ease of construction. The forward section was built as a unified wing-fuselage section, both to increase its structural strength, and reduce weight. The rear section was simpler, and its construction was given to other firms. Structurally, the aircraft made use of ‘extra super duralumin’, produced originally by Sumitomo metals before the war. It was an exceptionally strong material in aircraft design, and an area where Japanese aviation had forged ahead of the rest of the world. Once joined, the fuselage consisted of 38 bulkheads. At the nose was a glazed section for navigation, behind which there was a flat panel in the floor for aiming the bombsight. Several windows were installed along the nose for navigation and reconnaissance purposes. The cockpit was long, containing five crew positions, and doubled as an observation platform. The cockpit was equipped with radio navigation equipment and a level autopilot. The arrangement of instruments was somewhat unorthodox, with the pilot and copilot having non-identical sets of instruments on their respective sides. Notably, the copilot’s side lacks several navigational instruments, with the intent that he likely use the central panel which does have them, in the case of emergency. The fuselage carried a centerline fuel tank, along with a trio of tanks, which were situated in the fuselage and inner wing panel.

The aircraft’s navigator takes watch alongside the radioman. (aviacaoemfloripa)

The captain of the aircraft sat behind the pilot and copilot, and also doubled as the top gunner. The navigator sat at the rear, left side of the cockpit, with the radio operator sitting opposite him. Both of them also acted as the waist gunners in combat, with the navigator also being the bombardier. The cockpit and nose also doubled as watch stations for maritime patrol missions. The rear gunner was the only position without a secondary duty. It also was the only one with armor, with two small 5mm steel plates installed to protect the 20mm ammunition, but they were rarely kept aboard the plane.

The wings were built into the forward fuselage and were composed of an inner panel, outer panel, the engine mount, removable inner leading edges, and the flaps and ailerons. The wings were built incorporating an integral fuel tank between the spars, running from the fuselage to the end of the inner panel, with the surfaces of the wings representing the other walls of the container. These stores, combined with those in the fuselage, gave the aircraft a 4780 liter fuel capacity. External sections of 30mm rubber sheeting, installed from the 663rd plane onwards, provided a modicum of self sealing ability from punctures from below the aircraft. This added 300kg to the aircraft, reducing its speed by 5kts and reducing its range by 170 nm. The only other protective measures were flushing the compartments fore and aft of the wing tank with CO2, and adding CO2 fire extinguishers. The wings also contained a pair of two 150 liter oil tanks. The flaps and landing gear were electrically operated.

The tail section comprised a three section horizontal stabilizer featuring a center section embedded in the fuselage, connected to two outer panels. The vertical stabilizer featured a smaller, innerpanel, and a considerably larger outer panel. All of the control surfaces were equipped with trim tabs.

The Kasei 11 and 15 were fitted with metal Sumitomo, 3.4 meter, constant speed propellers. They began receiving prop spinners between the spring and summer of 1942. (arawasi-wildwings)

The aircraft was initially fitted with the Mitsubishi Kasei 11, a 42 liter, 14 cylinder radial engine which was rated at 1460hp at 2350 rpm, and had a full throttle height of 4.6km. It had a length of 1705mm and a height of 1340mm. It was replaced in March of 1942 with the Kasei 15, which incorporated a larger supercharger which improved its performance at higher altitudes. Apart from the supercharger, it was visually indistinguishable from the previous model. It produced 1420 hp at 2350 rpm, and had a full throttle height of 6km. Both used direct fuel injection and were equipped with a single stage, two speed supercharger, with the Kasei 15’s being far larger. Initially, there were only two exhaust stacks, but later models included one exhaust stack per cylinder.

Armament

The G4M1 had a bomb bay which could accommodate 800 kg of munitions. The bomb bay did not have retractable doors, but rather a removable fairing that was carried on the aircraft for reconnaissance, transportation, and ferry flights. The bomb load could consist of a single 500kg bomb, four of 250 kg bombs, twelve 60 kg bombs, and a variety of other devices, such as parachute flares, and target marking smoke. They were configured to use the Navy’s bombs, and with few exceptions were unable to make use of the weapons for Imperial Army aircraft. The suspension methods between the two forces differed, and their fuses were not interchangeable without the use of an adapter.

Ground crew maneuver a Type 91 aerial torpedo into place (rodswarbirds).

As with other Japanese torpedo attack aircraft, the G4M1 carried the Type 91 torpedo. This weapon was produced in a number of marks going back to 1931, though wartime stockpiles and production were the Models I, II, and III, possessing a common diameter. These had a diameter of 45 cm, and were powered by an eight cylinder, wet-heater type, radial steam engine. The Mod. It could carry a 150 kg warhead out to a range of 2 kilometers at a speed of 42 knots. The Mod. II, a 205 kg charge out to the same distance, with the Mod. III carrying a 240 kg warhead. The Mod.III also possessed an interchangeable warhead, allowing it to be converted to a Mod. IV, 300 kg, a V-Head 305 kg warhead, a Kite head at 355 kg, or the Mod.VII at 420 kg.

The Type 92 machine gun in its deployed position. (ww2db)

The bomber was equipped with three 7.7 mm Type 92 machine guns, and a single 20mm Type 99 machine gun. The Type 92’s were modernized variants of the British Lewis gun, being a gas blowback machine gun with a cyclic rate of 600 rounds per minute, and loaded from 97 cartridge pan magazines. The 20mm machine gun was an Oerlikon FFL adapted for an aircraft mount. It was an advanced primer blowback weapon with a cyclic rate of 490 rounds per minute. It could be loaded from 45, 60, or 100 round drum magazines. The 100 round magazines were a late war addition. The machine gun enclosures were two part blisters where the rearward half could be pulled inside the aircraft. The rear section was a conical frame that articulated to move with the position of the 20mm gun. By late 1942, it was commonly modified in the field by removing the rear half of the enclosure to give better visibility and field of fire. Later, it was redesigned to incorporate a rear cone with a framing that was less restrictive.

A view from the rear gunner’s position. A very common field modification involved removing the outer frame of the enclosure to improve visibility and allow for a greater traverse of the weapon, as has been done here. (aviaocampo)

Production

The G4M1 model 11 was produced at Mitsubishi Airframe Works No. 3 at Nagoya, with production beginning in 1940, with the completion of a single aircraft. Production picked up the following year at a low rate, peaking at 28 aircraft per month in December with 182 made during the year. Monthly production increased the following year, with around 30 planes being produced per month, with 39 being produced in December. 1943 production sat at roughly between 45 and 60 planes being produced per month, being produced alongside its replacement, the G4M2. Production of the G4M1 terminated in January of 1944, with a total of 1170 aircraft built, excluding the two prototypes and the abortive G6M1 project.

No.3 works fabricated the airframes and skinning for all of the aircraft built there, though other items including electrical components, instruments, wheel assemblies, rubber parts, pumps, and calves were supplied from other manufacturers. Conscripted labor began to be used early in the production of the G4M1, with conscript workers appearing in October 1941. The factory operated in two 11 hour shifts, with one hour and ten minutes in breaks for lunch and smoking. In addition to the G4M1, the plant was concurrently producing the A6M fighter ‘Zeke’ or Type Zero, the J2M ‘Jack’, and the F1 ‘Pete’ recon seaplane. Production of the G4M1 model 11 was terminated in January of 1944. It was superseded by the G4M2 Model 22 which replaced it on the production line.

Mitsubishi G4M1 Model 11 Specification

Engine Mitsubishi MK4E Kasei 15 (early models used the Kasei 11)
Engine Output 2x1420hp ( 2x1460hp)
Empty Weight 7000kg
Operating Weights 8810-13300kg
Maximum Range 2315 nm
Maximum Speed 252 knots at 4200m (without rubber wing sheeting)
Armament (payload limited by space not weight) 4x 7.7mm Machine Gun, 1x 20mm Machine Gun, 800kg payload
Crew Pilot, Copilot, Navigator/bombardier, Radio operator, Commander, Rear Gunner
Dimensions
Length 19.97m
Wingspan 24.88m
Wing Area 78.12m^2

Conclusion

The G4M1’s career spanned from triumph to disaster. (SDASM)

The G4M1 was perhaps the perfect material representation of the philosophy and martial attitudes of those who led Japan to war. It was an aircraft built entirely to suit the most aggressive plans possible, with little consideration given to its use outside of its, admittedly, broad focus, or a changing wartime environment. It was an excellent aircraft in prosecuting a war that had been meticulously planned, and was to end very quickly. Yet, this wasn’t the war Japan was to fight, instead finding themselves facing a flexible, and determined adversary with superior material and technical resources. In this shift, the compromises that made the G4M1 a deadly, long range weapon, became serious liabilities that threatened the usefulness of the aircraft. While the virtue of self-sacrifice was paramount to the Japanese military, it was to prove self destructive when the lives of experienced airmen far exceeded that of the aircraft they flew.

Illustration

The Kanoya Air Group was among the first units to be supplied with the G4M1, and flew them to devastating effect against American forces in the Philippines and Force Z. Kanoya Kokutai, January 1942.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Misawa Air Group was formed after the Japanese entry to WWII, its first combat station was Rabaul. The white square around the Hinomaru emblem denotes this plane as being part of an operational training unit. Misawa Kokutai, June 1943.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bataan 2 joined a G6M1 transport in delivering the Japanese surrender delegation to Manilla.

Credits

Written By Henry H.

Edited By Henry H.

Illustrated by Oussama Mohamed “Godzilla”

Sources:

Primary

G4M1 Model 11 Manual

Japanese Aircraft Performance and Characteristics TAIC Manual No. 1. Technical Air Intelligence Center. 1944.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd (Mitsubishi Jukogyo KK) Corporation Report No. 1 (Airframes and Engines). United States Strategic Bombing Survey Aircraft Division. 1947.

The Japanese Aircraft Industry. United States Strategic Bombing Survey Aircraft Division. 1947.

USS Chicago (CA29) Loss in Action 29-30 January 1943 Guadalcanal Island. Buships War Damage Report No. 36.

TM 9-1986-4/TO 39B-1A-11. Japanese Explosive Ordnance (Bombs, Bomb Fuzes, Land Mines, Grenades, Firing Devices and Sabotage Devices. United States Government Printing Office.

Japanese Air Weapons and Tactics. Military Analysis Division. 1947.

Secondary:

The Cactus Air Force Air War Over Guadalcanal. Eric Hammel & Thomas McKelvey Cleaver. 2022.

Neptune’s Inferno The U.S. Navy at Guadalcanal. James D. Hornfischer. 2011.

Fire and Fortitude The US Army in the Pacific War 1941-1943. John C. McManus. 2019.

Mitsubishi Type 1 Rikko ‘Betty’. Osamu Tagaya. 2001.

Profile Mitsubishi G4M ‘Betty’ & Ohka Bomb. Rene J. Francillon Ph.D. 1971.

American Nightfighter Aces of World War 2. Andrew Thomas and Warren Thompson. 2008.

Conquering the Night Army Air Forces Night Fighters at War. Stephen L. McFarland. 1998.

Japanese Aircraft of the Pacific War. Rene J. Francillon Ph.D. 1970.

Sunburst. Mark R. Peattie. 2001.

Kaigun. Mark R. Peattie and David C. Evans. 1997.

McCawley II (AP-10). Naval History and Heritage Command.

Birmingham II (CL-62). Naval History and Heritage Command.

Denver II (CL-58). Naval History and Heritage Command.

McKean I (Destroyer No. 90). Naval History and Heritage Command.

Intrepid IV (CV-11). Naval History and Heritage Command.

USS San Francisco (CA38) Gunfire Damage Battle of Guadalcanal 13 November 1942. War Damage Report No. 26. 1942.

Lt(jg) Haruki Iki Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN), Kanoya Kokutai (Kanoya Air Group). Pacific Wrecks.https://pacificwrecks.com/people/veterans/iki/index.html

 

Dorand AR in Serbian service

Kingdom of Serbia (1918)
Reconissanance and light bomberNumber operated: Around 40

After the defeat of the Kingdom of Serbia in 1916, what was left of its army managed to escape to Albania, where they suffered from disease, starvation, and harsh winter conditions. However, with the help of their allies, particularly France, Britain, and Italy, the Serbian army was able to recover and become a formidable force once again. In addition to rebuilding the ground forces, the Serbian Air Force was also reconstituted. During this time, the French provided several aircraft, including the Dorand AR 1 and 2.

Dorand AR in Serbian service at the Solonica Front Source: www.wikiwand.com

A Brief History of Serbian Early Aviation Development 

The first airplane flight undertaken by the Wright brothers in 1903 inspired many aviation enthusiasts to try to develop and build their own powered aircraft. For the small Kingdom of Serbia, this was achieved by Ivan Sarić (Иван Сарић), who managed to build his own aircraft named ‘Sarić  No.1’ in 1909. Due to problems with the engine, the first test flight was made the following year in July. This was the first-ever flight made by an operational aircraft in Serbia. In the following years, the interest in aviation further grew with the arrival of several well-known foreign pilots with their planes.

The Serbian Army was also impressed with this new technology and saw potential military use. For this reason, the Vazdušna Komanda (Eng. Air Force Command) was formed in the city of Niš at the end of 1912. The first 30 aircraft were brought from France in the same year. Some of these saw service during the First Balkan War, where they were mainly involved in reconnaissance operations.

When the First World War broke out after the assassination of the Austro-Hungarian Arch-Duke  Franz Ferdinand, in June 1914, Serbia was accused of aiding the assassins and Austro-Hungary soon declared war on its neighbor. The Serbian situation was precarious, given the exhausted army having depleted its resources after the two Balkan Wars. Despite the numerical and technical disadvantages, the Serbian Army managed to defeat the enemy invaders at battles such as Cer and Kolubara in 1914, which was the first Allied victory of the war. The Serbian Army was inferior in numbers but was superior in experience, possessing battle-hardening soldiers, and an excellent command structure.

The Serbian Air Force in 1915 operated a few armed aircraft. This Blerior XI-2 Genie named Oluj was the first such Serbian aircraft operated during the war. Source: www.blic.rs

Despite its battlefield victories, by 1916, disease and mounting losses took their toll, and when the next enemy assault came under the leadership of Germany’s own forces, Serbian resistance finally collapsed. The few aircraft available saw extensive use in reconnaissance missions. What was left of the Army managed to reach Albania, where the surviving soldiers were transported by the Allies to Greece where a new front was formed.

Solonica Front 

Over 100.000 Serbian soldiers managed to cross the Albanian mountains and join the Entente forces in Greece, where a new front was formed. The surviving soldiers after recuperation were supplied with new weapons, including aircraft. These were supplied by the French who helped train Serbian pilots. In April 1916, an agreement was signed between Serbia and its Allies to form the Avijatika Srpske Vojske (Eng. Aviation of the Serbian Army). It consisted of five mixed squadrons, of which three were allocated under Serbian command. In inventory, these units had 24 Farman F.40, 6 Nieuport 12s, and 21 Nieuport 21s.

Thanks to this delivered equipment, the Serbian Air Force was once again able to take the fight to the enemy. During 1916, they performed mostly reconnaissance, bombing, and artillery correction missions. In rarer cases, enemy fighters were engaged. In late 1916, the Serbian pilots second lieutenant Miletić and Captain Vukosaljević managed to shoot down a Bulgarian aircraft over Kožuf mountain in southern Macedonia. This marked the first Serbian air victory in history. In 1917, the Farman F.40 would be replaced with Dorand AR.1 and AR.2s

Dorand AR.1 and AR.2

The rapid aviation developments during this time often meant that certain models of aircraft did not stay long in service before needing to be replaced by new ones. This was the case with the  Farman F.40, which was becoming obsolete. As it became inadequate in the role of scout, the French replaced it with the Dorand AR.1 aircraft. This was a two-seater biplane developed by Section Technique de l’Aéronautique- STAe in 1916. This aircraft was intended to perform the role of a scout and a light bomber. Interestingly, the lower wing was not directly connected to the Dorand fuselage but suspended under it. The pilot was seated to the front, with the observer/rear machine gunner placed just behind him. Its armament consisted of one forward-mounted Vickers 7,7 mm machine gun, and the rear gunner operated one or two Lewis 7.7 mm machine guns. In addition, a small bomb load consisting of 80 kg could be carried.

The French Dorand AR.1 reconnaissance and light bomber aircraft. Source: Wiki

There were a few different versions of this aircraft powered by various engines. Initially, a Renault 8Gb 160 hp engine was used, but it was later replaced by a stronger 8Gc 190 engine. The AR.2 version was powered by a stronger 8Bd 200 hp engine, and the wing design was changed. It entered service in 1917, and by the end of the war some 1,425 aircraft of these types were built. Besides the French Air Force, some models were given to the US, Greece, and Serbian Air forces.

In Serbian Service

Given their fairly large production numbers, the Dorand aircraft would see service almost on all fronts in Europe, except in the East.  They began to arrive at the frontline starting in February 1917. In the Balkans, they began to appear in greater numbers during mid-1917. Initially, these were mainly allocated to French units, replacing the G.40 aircraft.  Initially, four such aircraft were allocated to the Serbian F. 524 squadron in February of 1917. Given the lack of radiators, these were stored and not used up to June 1917. More extensive distribution to Serbian units did not occur before the end of the 1917 winter.  To train pilots, a training center was established at Termi town in Greece. Around 40 aircraft of the AR 1, of different sub-versions, were allocated to the Serbian Air Force which operates on this front. While at least one AR.2 also was used. The precise number of allocated aircraft of this type is unknown to this day.  In either case, these saw combat service during the Entente offensive launched in September 1918. Despite having around 40 such aircraft, due to a lack of properly trained pilots only 26 were used.

While the precise number of these aircraft allocated to the Serbian Air Force is unknown it is believed that at least 40 were received as aid. Source: flyingmachines.ru
These aircraft would see service during the Entente Offensive in September 1918. Source: www.paluba.info
Serbian King Aleksandar I Karađorđević visiting a workshop in Greece where a Dorand AR.1 was under repair. Source: www.paluba.info

With the collapse of the  Bulgarian forces, the Solonica front was breached by the Entante forces in late September 1918. Thanks to this victory, the Serbian Army finally liberated its homeland. Regarding the Dorand in Serbian service, their fate was unceremonious as some of them were left behind in Greece. Most of them were discarded and scrapped shortly after the end of the war. Some 13 surviving AR 1 aircraft were pressed into service with the new Air Force of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes. This new Air Force in its early years lacked a sufficient number of pilots and funds to maintain the Dorand aircraft. By 1920 this aircraft was rarely used, and soon after, it was removed from service and replaced by Brege 14 aircraft..  While no aircraft survived to this day, two of their propellers are preserved and stored at the Aeroklub Novi Sad.

A lone AR. 1 in use after the war in Novi Sad in 1919. Source: www.paluba.info

Conclusion

The Dorand AR.1 and AR.2 biplanes despite being designed to replace the obsolete F.40 were themselves, rather not impressive designs. Nevertheless over 1,000 such aircraft would be built by the end of the war. Those allocated to the Serbian Air Force at Salonika Front would see some combat service. But their service was rather short, being used mainly in late 1918. After the war most were removed from service and those that were used, did so only briefly before being replaced by better designs.

Dorand AR.1 Specification

Wingspans 13.3 m / 43 ft 8 in
Length 9.14 m /  29 ft  9 in
Height 3.3 m /  10  ft 8 in
Wing Area 50 m² / 540 ft²
Engine One Renault 190 hp engine
Empty Weight 890 kg / 1,960 lbs
Maximum Takeoff Weight 1,330 kg / 2,930 lbs
Maximum Speed 148km/h / 90 mph
Service ceiling 5.5 km / 18,000 ft
Range 276  km / 172 miles
Flight Endurance 3 hours
Crew Two – the pilot and the observer/rear gunner
Armament
  • One forward 7.7 mm  (0.31 in) Vickers
  • And one or two same caliber Levis machine guns
  • 80 kg of bombs

Illustration

 

Credits:

  • Written by Marko P.
  • Edited by Henry H.
  • Illustration by Godzilla

Source:

  • Č. Janić and O. Petrović, Kratka Istorija Vazduhoplovstva u Srbiji, Aero komunikacije
  • D. Cvetković and I. Cvetković (2016) Borbeni Avioni Prvog Svetskog Rata, Medija Centar Odbrana
  • D. Aleksić and N. Đokić (2008) Francuski vazduhoplovi U Naoružanju Vosjke i Mornarice Kraljevine Jugolsavije, INIS
  • http://www.vazduhoplovnetradicijesrbije.rs/index.php/clanak

 

Hwasŏng Missile Series and Missile Carriers

Democratic People’s Republic of Korea – (1960s – Present)

Hwasŏng-15 being launched during a test. Source: KCNA via The Diplomat https://i.imgur.com/eEJVew1.jpeg

The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) is one of the world’s lesser-known nations, but one that is periodically mentioned in Western media for diplomatic incidents with neighboring nations after testing ballistic missiles. This article attempts to shed light on Korea’s most famous, and numerous family of ballistic missiles, the Hwasŏng, in English literally “Star of Fire”, which in the Korean language (Hangŭl) indicates the planet Mars.

Creation of the DPRK Missile Program

Going back in the history of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, the first rockets it had available were various artillery rocket systems from the Soviet Union, such as the BM-8, BM-13 and BM-31 ‘Katyusha’ Multiple Rocket Launchers. These systems first arrived between 1948 and 1950 in Korea and were used against UN forces during the Korean War with great results.

In the following years, several ‘Katyushas’ remained in service with the KPA, and in the early 1960s they were joined by the modern 122 mm, BM-21 ‘Grad’, and Chinese produced MLRs such as the 107 mm Type 63. Both systems were studied and reverse engineered in late 1960s, with the creation of the 122 mm BM-11 MRLs and 107 mm Type 75.

North Korean-produced 122 mm BM-11 on ZiL-151 trucks. These are the most common Korean copies of the BM-21 ‘Grad’ MLRS distinguishable for the presence of 30 tubes instead of 40 divided in two blocks of 15 tubes. Source: KCBC https://i.imgur.com/4fBuab4.jpg

Between 1968 and 1970, North Korea purchased several S-2 ‘Sopka’ coastal defense missiles from the Soviet Union, enough to equip 5 batteries. With the help of the People’s Republic of China, North Korea created the first maintenance and assembly facilities for the S-2 missiles, and newly purchased HY-1 Chinese anti-ship missiles. The deliveries of these anti-ship missiles were made both from Chinese military stocks, and kits that were assembled in Korea at the Mangyongdae Facility, to allow Korean scientists to become familiar with the systems.

North Korean S-2 ‘Sopka’ coastal defense missiles during a parade in early 1970s. Source: KCBC https://i.imgur.com/EEwPx7t.png

Later in the 1960s, the Soviet Union supplied the DPRK with heavy artillery rockets, defined by NATO as Free Rockets Over Grounds (FROGs). More precisely these were 3R9 Luna and 3R10 Luna-2 rockets in 2K6 complexes (FROG-3 and FROG-5), and 9M21 Luna-M rockets in 9K52 complexes (FROG-7). An important note is that the USSR refused to help Korea create its own missile program for political issues, and only aided Korea in building facilities to assemble anti-ship and S-75 missiles. On the other hand, China delivered many types of reverse engineered Soviet Surface-to-Air Missiles (SAM), anti-ship missiles, and associated technologies to DPRK. Chinese assistance would probably have been greater, but the PRC did not possess the same systems, and level of knowledge, as the Soviet Union.

In 1972, the DPRK created its first missile plant for the production of Chinese anti-ship missiles but, for their assembly, they still needed some hi-tech components from China. These SAMs, and coastal defense anti-ship missiles, provided the Korean engineers with material to familiarize themselves with modern missile technologies, such as rocket guidance and propulsion. By 1973, North Korea had enough missiles to equip its navy with 10 Komar-class, and 8 Osa-class missile boats armed with P-15 and HY-1 missiles.

A North Korean S-75 ‘Dvina’ SAM battery (or its Chinese copy, the HQ-2). The Koreans later reached the goal of producing this system indigenously, calling it Pongae-1. Source: KCBC https://i.imgur.com/Ir2eVLP.png

 

Some sources claim that the DPRK received 24 Luna, Luna-2 and Luna-M and an equal number of 2P16 Transporter Erector Launcher (TEL) but this number has never been confirmed with certainty, in fact, another source says that the DPRK received between 27 and 63 missiles, and 9 TELs, from the Soviet Union. Some also state that the DPRK acquired between 24 and 56 9M21 Luna-Ms between 1975 and 1976, together with 6 or 8 TELs from Egypt, but these deliveries have never been confirmed.

North Korean 3R9 Luna loaded on 2P16 chassis. Source: KCTV https://i.imgur.com/Ewcyn7h.jpg

 

 

Nomenclature
Missiles NATO TEL Complex
3R9 Luna FROG-3 2P16 2K6
3R10 Luna-2 FROG-5 2K6
9M21 Luna-M FROG-7 9K52

The first copies of these missiles appeared in the following years, being renamed Hwasŏng.

The code Hwasŏng-1 being uncertain to which missile it refers to, but all sources seems to agree that it is the Korean designation of the indigenous production of the 2K6 Luna, while Hwasŏng-3 is the Korean designation of the indigenous production of the 9K52 Luna-M missiles.

A Soviet-produced 9P113 TEL equipped with 9M21 Luna-M in Korean service in a frame of a propaganda video. Source: twitter.com @KPA_bot https://i.imgur.com/Df5XEFd.jpeg

The two missiles had a range of 45 and 65 km (28 and 40 miles), and carried a High-Explosive warhead of about 400 kg (881 lb). The Soviet models could be equipped with small nuclear warheads, but the Koreans, at that time, did not have miniaturized nuclear weapons, as the first tests on a nuclear reactor were only carried out in 1958. It is, however, very likely that the DPRK developed chemical warheads for such missiles.

Data on the missiles designated Hwasŏng-2 and Hwasŏng-4 are unknown, but they never reached mass production.

Some sources speculate that the designation Hwasŏng-2 was given to the Korean copy of the S-75 surface-to-air missile, a hypothesis rejected thanks to Korea itself, that calls the S-75 copy Pongae-1. The Hwasŏng-4 may have been given by the Koreans to the joint project of a Short-Range Ballistic Missile (SRBM), between DPRK and People’s Republic of China, referred by the Chinese sources to Dōngfēng-61 (DF-61). This project was born at the end of the 1970s at the behest of Kim Il-sung himself, who in April 1975, traveled to Beijing where Oh Jin-u, North Korean defense minister, asked the People’s Republic of China to purchase their SRBM missiles.

The DF-61 program, born in late 1976 to develop a missile with a range of 600 km (372 miles) and possess a warhead of 1,000 kg (2,200 lb), had a very short life due to the fact that in 1978 its main Chinese supporter, Chen Xilian was limited in his powers and eventually purged for political reasons in 1980. The failure of the DF-61, however, was not a defeat for the DPRK technicians, as thanks to the exchange of knowledge with the Chinese, had greatly increased their knowledge of missile design. In these years, the DPRK gradually diminished their imports of anti-ship missile technology from China, in favor of indigenously produced equipment.

The Hwasŏng-5 – The First Korean SRBM

Due to the deterioration of relations with Moscow, and the unsuccessful joint project with China, the DPRK, as soon as the DF-61 project was closed, decided to turn to another country. A nation that possessed Soviet-made missiles and that, at the same time, was in debt to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea: the Arab Republic of Egypt.

International relations between Korea and Egypt have always been very close from the mid 1950s. In early 1973, after political issues, Egyptian president Anwar Sadat expatriated all the Soviet advisors, pilots and instructors from its country. It was a bad idea, considering that the Arab nation was preparing to launch an attack on Israel, and its military was dependent on Soviet equipment. In March 1973, a delegation from the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea led by Kang Ryang-uk, Vice President of the Supreme People’s Assembly of the DPRK, visited Egypt, and the Egyptians asked for Korean technical assistance with their missile program.

In June 1973, 20 MiG-21 pilots and 19 ground crew members from the Korean People’s Air Force were sent to Egypt to train the Egyptian pilots. When the Yom Kippur War broke out on 6th October 1973, the DPRK’s pilots (joined by others that arrived later) supported Egyptian troops against the Israeli Defense Force.

This was only the last of a series of diplomatic and military trades between the Arab country and the small Asian country; and it was a good excuse to ask a favor to Egypt, with Kim Il-sung requesting Soviet-produced SRBMs from Egypt. Some sources claim that the missiles were received in 1976 while other claims they were received by Korea in 1981. Despite the discordant sources, Egyptian president Sadat agreed to sell to the DPRK SCUD-B missiles received from the Soviet Union in the early 1970s for use against Israel. It seems that the agreement was not signed until 1981.

A Soviet SRBM R-17E Elbrus during training in the Soviet Union. The Transporter Erector Launcher is a MAZ-543P. Source: topwar.ru https://i.imgur.com/ENUceGk.jpg

The Short-Range Ballistic Missiles received from Egypt were the R-17E ‘Elbrus’ (also known as 8K14E, or with the NATO name SS-1C SCUD-B). These were purchased together with a Soviet-made TEL, a MAZ-543P. A missile production factory, Factory 125 in P’yŏngyang, the Research and Development Institute in Sanum-dong, and the Musudan-ri Launch Facility were also set up in the DPRK at that time with the help of Soviet Union, which by the early 1980s changed had changed their policy about helping Korea in its missile program.

It should be noted, however, that a Korean defector claimed that in 1972, 20 SCUD-Bs were provided by the Soviet Union in exchange for the secret material found aboard the USS Pueblo in 1968, which was provided by the DPRK to the USSR. This claim however has never been confirmed, and in fact, in the 1970s and early 1980s, no SCUD-B tests were reported, and it is very likely that his information was a misidentification or totally false.

The R-17E had a slow process of reverse engineering which led DPRK engineers to develop a slightly modified domestic version, which was christened Hwasŏng-5, the first SRBM produced by DPRK. To finance the reverse engineering program, funds were allocated from Islamic Republic of Iran. Prime Minister Mir-Hosein Musavi and Defense Minister Colonel Mohammad Salimi in October 1983, signed an agreement with North Korea to finance the Korean program in exchange for receiving missiles when the program concluded.

The warheads of Hwasŏng-5 or -6 presented to Kim Jong-il. Source: twitter.com @KPA_bot https://i.imgur.com/TWd63kC.jpeg

In 1984, the first Korean copies of the R-17E were produced and the first test launch took place in April of the same year with some others occurring for the rest of the year, with at least two failures. It seems that all the R-17E in Korean arsenals were dismantled and studied to copy their components, even if some statements hypothesize that some missiles tested in 1984 were R-17Es, and were launched to confuse the analysts on the real results of the missile program. Incredibly, the first official appearance of the Hwasŏng-5 was on 7th April 2007 and a year after one camouflaged Hwasŏng-5 was shown to a Myanmar delegation.

Camouflaged Hwasŏng-5 exposed in a DPRK’s underground missile facility to a Myanmar delegation in 2008. Source: The Armed Forces of North Korea https://i.imgur.com/YAalhbw.jpg

The first version, however, saw a very limited pilot production and was replaced by a new version of the Hwasŏng-5 in 1985, when the full scale production also started.

This version had a length of about 12 meters (39 feet), a diameter of about 0.8 meters (2.6 feet) and a range of 330-340 km or 205-211 miles (compared to 300 km -186 miles – of the R-17E) and a 1,000 kg warhead that could be standard High Explosive, Cluster, Chemical and probably even Biological. The Hwasŏng-5 was produced until 1989 when it was replaced by the Hwasŏng-6. The number of Hwasŏng-5s produced is unknown.

A Hwasŏng-5 night launch. Source: twitter.com @KPA_bot https://i.imgur.com/q6V1Cxt.jpeg

The Hwasŏng-6 was developed on the basis of the Hwasŏng-5 starting in 1987, when Korean engineers began working on the missile guidance system to reduce the Circular Error Probable (CEP), the maximum distance the missile could miss the target.

According to North Korean sources, the CEP of the Hwasŏng-6 was decreased from several hundred meters of the Hwasŏng-5 to 50 meters (164 feet). The increased accuracy of the missile allowed the warhead to be decreased to 750 kg (1,653 lb), and increased to size of the rocket’s fuel tanks which brought the estimated total range to 500-700 km (310-434 miles).

Another image of night launch of a Hwasŏng-5. Source: twitter.com @KPA_bot https://i.imgur.com/LUWdpnp.jpeg

The first test of the Hwasŏng-6 took place in 1988, immediately after which the assembly lines were modified, and mass production began in 1989. According to some Western estimates, in 1999, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea was estimated to have produced 600 to 1,000 Hwasŏng-6, of which 300 to 500 had been exported, and 300 to 500 were in service with the Korean People’s Army Strategic Rocket Force, and 25 were used in tests.

The Hwasŏng-5 and Hwasŏng-6 enabled the DPRK to work on its missile program by providing a good deal of knowledge, and laying the foundation for the Korean People’s Army to become independent of the Soviet Union and the People’s Republic of China in the development of Ballistic Missiles.

1990s Development: New Leader, New Threats

The new decade brought a number of changes to the DPRK: first, though not the most important, the collapse of the Soviet Union, followed a few years later by the death of Kim Il-sung. On 8th July 1994 North Korea’s Great Leader Kim Il-sung died suddenly from a heart attack leaving his first-born son Kim Jong-il, the leader of the nation which, after the fall of the Berlin Wall, and the collapse of the Soviet Union, had been almost completely isolated. The collapse of the Soviet Union resulted in the cessation of the supply of wheat and other edibles to Korea drastically decreasing the food supply in the country, which was also due to several crop damage recorded in the late 80s and early 90s. The famine occurred between 1994 to 1998 and is known in Korea as the Arduous March which caused an estimated number of 240,000 to 3,5 millions of deaths from starvation or hunger-related illnesses. Kim Jong-il instead of investing funds in agricultural growth to get out of famine, launched the Songun policy, a sort of “Military-First” policy aimed at improving North Korean military capabilities at the expense of the population.

The “Dear” Leader Kim Jong-il with its bodyguards at the P’yŏngyang International Airport await the Chinese president Yang Shangkun in April 1992. Source: cbsnews.com https://i.imgur.com/egAbEEW.jpg

This increased Western fears of Kim Jong-il, who was seen as an unscrupulous dictator and thus capable of starting a war against South Korea. South Korean and US analysts were already predicting that he was a much more dangerous character than his father because of a number of bombings against South Korea that had occurred in previous years, under his initiative. These included the Rangoon Bombing of 9th October 1983, an attempt to kill the South Korean president Chun Doo-hwan, and the Korean Air Flight 858 Bombing on 29th November 1987 to intimidate travelers to the South Korean Olympic Games.

The new decade did not bring only bad news to Korea, however. The destabilization of the Soviet Union in 1989 allowed Korea to bring some Soviet scientists closer to its cause on the pretext of lack of work, if the Cold War ended. In April 1991 Korean agents contacted Soviet solid-state physicist Anatoliy Rubtsov in Beijing during a meeting. They offered to Rubtsov to recruit Soviet physicists and scientists for them in the Soviet Union, in exchange for compensation from the North Korean embassy in Moscow. The proposal was attractive, and it was clear that the Soviet Union would not last long, and so Rubtsov accepted.

Dr. Rubtsov began recruiting Soviet strategic weapons specialists at the Makeyev Rocket Design Bureau in Miass in February 1992. His offers to work in Korea were quite interesting, with monthly salaries ranging from $1,500 to $4,000 to work on North Korean missile and nuclear programs; however, the program included assistance to other unknown nations, likely Iran and Syria.

The total number of Russian scientists that were recruited by Dr. Rubtsov is unknown, some analysts quote the number to be about 60 scientists, but according to Russian and Western sources, at least 64 were blocked in Russian airports before their departure to Korea.

In January 1994, a Japanese newspaper claimed,quoting Russian reports, that the Russian missile specialists in DPRK were 17, including Dr. Rubtsov, plus another 9 nuclear scientists. Along with these scientists, there may have been many others since upon arrival in Korea, some not only received Korean citizenship but also changed their names.

In the late 1980s, the DPRK began development of a new missile that was essentially a scaled-up version of the earlier Hwasŏng-5 and 6: the Hwasŏng-7, also known by its unofficial Western nickname of Nodong-1 ,or Rodong-1 depends which type of translation is used.

The Hwasŏng-7 was first uncovered by the West in May 1990 at the Musudan-ri Test Launch Facility, when it was still under development and later tested 1992.

The first version of the Hwasŏng-7, with single conical nose and interesting camouflage loaded on its TEL, ready to be tested. Source: twitter.com @KPA_bot https://i.imgur.com/tPhC2Qa.jpg

With a length of about 18 meters (59 feet), a diameter of 1.35 meters (4.1 feet), and a speed of mach 10 (12.348 km/h – 7,672 miles per hour). This new missile is a step forward compared to previous DPRK designs. There are two versions of the Hwasŏng-7: a version with a standard conical nose with a 1,000 kg warhead, and a range estimated at around 1,000 km (621 miles), and a version with a double conical nose that decreases the warhead to about 700 kg (1543 lb), but increases its range to an estimated maximum of 1,500 km (932 miles).

A big step forward for the DPRK, was that it could now threaten Japan with a missile capable of carrying a small atomic warhead.

The second version of the Hwasŏng-7, with double conical nose during a parade in Kim Il-sung Square in P’yŏngyang. Source: gladiusds.com https://i.imgur.com/bP2Q4Ah.jpg

Due to the restricted airspace of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, not many Hwasŏng-7 tests have ever been reported. However, we can take as an example the Islamic Republic of Iran which has purchased the Hwasŏng-7, and has produced several indigenous variants called Shahab-3 which, although possessing some differences with the original missiles. These have a range of 1,280 km (795 miles) for the 1,000 kg warhead version and 1,930 km (1,199 miles) with the lighter warhead. According to some estimates, the KPA-SF have about 300 Hwasŏng-7 but have fewer than 50 TELs to transport and launch them.

The Iranian copy of the Hwasŏng-7, the Shahab-3 during testing in Iran. Source: wikipedia.org https://i.imgur.com/1jBQ26b.jpg

Kim Jong-il did not slow down the missile development started by his father, and under his leadership was presented a new missile designed Hwasŏng-8 appears to be a modified Hwasŏng-6 variant with a 500 kg (1,102 lb) warhead and a length increased to 12.4 meters (40.6 feet) allowing the missile to reach a maximum range of 700 km (1,543 miles).

The Hwasŏng-8 missile before 2010. Source: pinterest.com https://i.imgur.com/kxCK5aE.jpg

Despite the characteristics suitable to hit targets in South Korea, it seems that this missile has never been used by the KPA but only by Syria that tested it in September 2000. For unknown reasons, the Hwasŏng-8 reappeared in 2021, but it seems that the name was simply given to another missile based on the first stage of the Hwasŏng-14. The new Hwasŏng-8 is claimed to be the first North Korean Hypersonic Medium-Range Ballistic Missile with Hypersonic Glide Vehicle (HGV), becoming a dangerous threat for South Korea because of its speed and ability to change trajectory, which results in greater difficulty of being intercepted by anti-ballistic missile.

New Hwasŏng-8 test launch occurred on 14th September 2021. Source: KCTV https://i.imgur.com/sqMJEwu.jpg

The Hwasŏng-9 (US Department of Defence – DoD designation KN-04) first appeared in 1994, but remained relatively unknown in the west West until 2016. This is the last missile in the Hwasŏng series to have ties to the Soviet R-17E.

The diameter has increased to just over a meter while the length is about 12.8 meters (42 feet).

Four Hwasŏng-9 simultaneously launched by their TELs on March 6, 2017. Source: militarywatchmagazine.com

The structure appears to be made of an aluminum alloy, combining the Korean copy of the Isayev RD-21 engine with a 500 kg warhead that can be launched against a target about 1,000 km away, making it a Medium-Range Ballistic Missile (MRBM). Unfortunately, estimates of how many Hwasŏng-9 missiles the Korean People’s Army – Air and Anti-Air Force (KPA-AF) has in service are unknown, some estimates refer to as few as 15 while others exaggerate that number to as many as 100.

 

Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un watching four successfully launched Hwasŏng-9 from a high quarter some kilometers away. Source: KCNA via twitter.com @KPA_bot

In 1999 the Korean People’s Army’s Ground Force Artillery Commands subordinate to the KPA-AF were reorganized into the new Korean People’s Army – Strategic Rocket Force (KPA-SRF).

The beginning of the new century – The Beginning of a New Missile Era for DPRK

First appearing in 2010, the first Intermediate-Range Ballistic Missile (IRBM) to enter service was the Hwasŏng-10, which has received several unofficial nicknames including: Nodong-2, Taepodong-X, BM-25 and Musudan. In appearance the missile is really similar to the Soviet-designed R-27 ‘Zyb’ Submarine-Launched Ballistic Missiles (SLBM).

Soviet R-27 ‘Zyb’ exhibited at the Peresvet museum, Moscow Oblast. Source: Stanislav Kozlovskij https://i.imgur.com/X6EgXvq.jpg

Despite its late appearance, it is certain that its development began in the mid-1990s, and is thanks to the knowledge brought to the country by the Russian scientists led by Dr. Rubtsov, now member of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Science Academy.The first presentation to Kim Jong-il took place in 2004, but was kept secret. Also the absence of missile tests for such a long time made many believe that this missile was a fake created to confuse Western secret agencies. The missile can be equipped with a conventional warhead of about 1,000 kg or with a nuclear warhead with an estimated power between 80 and 200 kilotons.

A Hwasŏng-10 being launched by its TELs with protections to cover the wheels from the heat generated by the launch. Source: KCNA https://i.imgur.com/vyjHEsT.jpg

Obviously, the missile received some modifications to better suit Korean requirements.

The TEL designated to carry this missile could carry 20 tons of cargo, while the R-27 weighed only 14 tons, and so it was decided to enlarge the missile, bringing it from 8.8 meters (28.8 feet), to about 11 meters (36 feet) in length, thus increasing the previous range of about 600 km (372 miles) to 2,400 km (1,491 miles). Another big difference seems to be the fuel supply of this missile, which appears to be a hypergolic mixture of Unsymmetrical DiMethylHydrazine (UDMH) as fuel and Nitrogen TetrOxide (NTO) as oxidizer.

As for the UDMH, it was a step forward since previous Korean missiles used a Soviet version of the Tonka German-designed rocket propellant, a mixture of Nitric Acid and Kerosene also known as TM-185. As for the Oxidizer, it is unknown which was used, the original R-27 used AK-27P Inhibited Red Fuming Nitric Acid (IRFNA) and was very similar to the one used on the R-17 Elbrus missiles. This would have led the DPRK to not have to modify its chemical plants to produce this oxidizer, but later this hypothesis was denied.

The DPRK used a new oxidizer on the upgraded version of the Soviet R-27U missile, namely N2O4 which gave the new version a range of 3,000 km (1,864 miles).

It is true that N2O4 is more refined and powerful, and would increase the range of the missile, but it is also more difficult to handle because it is more volatile and toxic than the already extremely dangerous AK-27P IRFNA and in fact is rarely used as oxidizer for ground ballistic missiles. NTO also has a narrow range of temperatures for the liquid form, forcing the user to periodically make environmental controls.

Despite these issues, Western analysts and technicians have stated that NTO is the best match for the flight path of the Hwasŏng-10 in the June 2016 ballistic test. Despite the switch to such an oxidizer, the missile has a range of “only” 3,000 km and is unable, for example, to reach new strategic targets such as the Island of Guam, and so while it is a big step in DPRK missile development, it does not amplify its offensive capabilities.

The Hwasŏng-10 during a parade. Interestingly the missiles are slightly elevated on their launch platforms. Source: KCBC https://i.imgur.com/8wMOiut.jpg

According to Korean sources, a version of the missile was tested with solid fuel in 2016; it would be a Korean version of the Julang-1 SLBM. The use of solid fuel would increase the missile’s range to 3,500 km (2,174 miles). The Hwasŏng-10 was spotted rarely in parades and only a few test launch were made, this suggests that the Koreans had found serious problems during its testing and preferred to abandon the project when newer missiles were completed.

In the first decade of the new millennium, the DPRK continued to improve its missile program, such that after the Hwasŏng-10, the next ballistic missiles are powered by solid fuel. This has led to a substantial modification of chemical plants and fuel production, in fact, producing liquid fuels is cheaper, easier and less dangerous. This modification will certainly cost a lot to the DPRK, but it has brought a series of unprecedented innovations.

First of all, the solid fuels are more energy dense than liquid fuels guaranteeing to missile of the same size and weight to possess superior range than it were to it be using liquid fuel. They also do not need a lengthy fueling process before the launch, which makes the TEL and the missile very vulnerable to enemy attacks. Liquid fuels are more volatile and could cause catastrophic explosions in the event of an accident To avoid this, the missiles were fueled immediately before launch from specialized tanker trucks. In the case of short-range ballistic missiles, this operation can take a short time, less than an hour, but with medium-range and intermediate-range ballistic missiles, this operation can take much longer. This period of time when the TEL and the missile are stationary in the launch zone can be easily detected by enemy spy satellites, and South Korea or the United States may then decide to launch preemptive strikes to prevent its launch.

With solid-fueled missiles, the fueling phase is eliminated, dramatically decreasing the time to battery and launch the missile. At the same time, the missile does not need specialized vehicles in its vicinity, this reduces the logistics and total cost for Korea, and the risk of being intercepted by spy satellites.

The earliest example of a North Korean solid-fuel missile is the Hwasŏng-11 tactical ballistic missile ,US DoD designation KN-02, a copy of the Soviet 9K79M ‘Tochka’. Its unofficial western nickname is ‘Toksa’ (Eng: Viper). First appearing in 2004, and with still debated origins, some sources speculate that the Hwasŏng-11 may be reverse engineered from Soviet missiles purchased in the 1990s from Syria, while other sources do not exclude the possibility that the missiles were purchased from Russia itself, perhaps even with the signing of a contract for Russian development support in the late 1990s or early 2000s.

The debate becomes even more complex when considering that the South Korean Media reports the first test of the Hwasŏng-11, which was unsuccessfully tested in 2004, was based on a Soviet 9K79-1 ‘Tochka-U’ model missile that Syria did not yet possess at that time.

This claim by the South Korean media cannot be confirmed and most importantly, the missile externally is much more similar to the 9K79M rather than the 9K79-1.

The Hwasŏng-11 on parade in late 2000s. The missiles were slightly erected on their launch platforms to be visible to the folks, normally they were stored inside with truck tops closed. Source: militarywatchmagazine.com https://i.imgur.com/tzHsxYv.png

As Israeli military sources stated in 1989, Syria and the DPRK cooperated in developing Surface-to-Surface Missiles (SSMs). Thanks to this agreement, Korean engineers were able to study other solid-fuel missiles, such as the 4K44 ‘Redut’, P-20 ‘Rubezh-A’, and also the Tupolev Tu-143 ‘Reys’ Unmanned Reconnaissance Aircraft with solid-fuel engines, whichSyria delivered in exchange for Korean help. In 1994, the missiles were exported to Korea which began reverse engineering them.

The Hwasŏng-11 is a small missile compared to the others of the Hwasŏng series. With 6.4 meters (21 feet) long and 0.65 meters (2.1 feet) in diameter, it has a shorter range than previous missiles, reaching about 220 km (136 miles) but it has a CEP reduced to less than 100 meters (328 feet). With a payload capacity of 485 kg (1,069 lb), quite exceptional for a 2 tons missile, its warhead can be a single HE, HE submunition, thermonuclear, chemical, and probably biological. This missile is considered by the KPA-SRF as an emergency missile, capable of being launched in a short time, and thanks to its dimensions, it is easily concealable. It must be launched as close as possible from the Demilitarized Zone without being spotted, due to its short range.

Despite its reduced dimensions, this missile is considered to be a great threat from Democratic Republic of Korea missile experts. Analysts have hypothesized, that given the nuclear weapons progress of the DPRK, it could be armed with a reduced nuclear warhead of 100 kilotons, therefore being able to hit Seoul from P’yŏngyang. The big problem is that such missiles, and their TELs, are very difficult to keep under observation due to their small size and can therefore, in case of conflict, be even more dangerous than the Hwasŏng behemoths that are easier to identify and keep an eye on. The reduced dimensions also translate in cheaper production and maintenance costs,even for the TELs, meaning that North Korea could increase its arsenal of Hwasŏng-11s and launch them in salvos against South Korea as first strike weapons to saturate anti-missile defenses before the arrival of more powerful ballistic missiles.

Its maximum speed is estimated to be around mach 5 (6.174 km/h – 3,836 miles per hour), being able to reach Seoul from P’yŏngyang in only one minute and forty seconds.

Its speed is not its biggest advantage, in fact, the missile has a trajectory similar to MRLs and is difficult to intercept and counter by South Korean missile countermeasures.

Despite some speculations, the first successful test took place in 2005 and mass production likely started the following year. According to some ROKA estimates, the KPA-SRF has 100 Hwasŏng-11 missiles in active service and 30 TELs to launch them. Also according to South Korean estimates, TEL commissioning operations are around 16 minutes with 2 minutes to launch the missile and another 20 minutes to reload the TEL increasing the threat along the southern half of the peninsula.

2010s – New Leader, New Program

In the decade that saw the death of the second member of the Kim dynasty, there were developments unexpected by a nation like Korea. Kim Jong-il died from a heart attack on 17th December 2011 leaving the country in the hands of his third son, Kim Jong-un.

The money gained by illicit activities of the DPRK, such as counterfeiting foreign currency, drug trade, and other traffic allowed the new leader, Kim Jong-un to invest billions in the development of new ICBMs.

North Korea new leader Kim Jong-un inspect a Hwasŏng-12 missile on its TEL shortly before the missile test in May 2014. Source: brookings.edu https://i.imgur.com/yzjEdQ0.jpg

North Korea new leader Kim Jong-un inspect a Hwasŏng-12 missile on its TEL shortly before the missile test in May 2014. Source: brookings.edu https://i.imgur.com/yzjEdQ0.jpg

Soviet UR-100K InterContinental Ballistic Missile. Source: b14643.de https://i.imgur.com/euFdOl1.jpg

Going in numerical order, the Hwasŏng-12 (US DoD designation KN-17) was first spotted on 2014, some sources suspect it is a Korean copy of the Soviet two-stage liquid fuel Inter-Continental Ballistic Missile UR-100.

The new Korean missile lies somewhere between an Intermediate-Range Ballistic Missile and an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM), and has a diameter of about 1.5 meters (4.92 feet), and a height of 16 meters (52.5 feet). The propulsion of the first stage is about 100 tons of thrust, provided by 4 auxiliary engines, and an engine of 85 tons of thrust. This being the Paekdusan-1B (or Baekdusan-1B depending which type of translation is used), the Korean name of which seems to be an engine derived from the Glushko RD-250, used on some Soviet ICBMs. Initially, it was not clear how the Koreans had the opportunity to study such an engine, at first it was assumed that they had the support of Russian or Ukrainian engineers after the fall of the Soviet Union, and maybe even some samples of the engine. It is more plausible that Korea came into possession of the official blueprints, stolen from the Yuzhonoye Design Office in Ukraine. In fact, in May 2012 two North Korean citizens were arrested in Ukraine on charges of stealing confidential documents from that office. Due to the possibility of this missile hitting Guam island, many western sources nicknamed it “The Guam Killer”.

Launching the Hwasŏng-12 near P’yŏngyang on 29th August 2017. Source: thediplomat.com https://i.imgur.com/585X6H3.jpg

It seems however that the Korean variant is equipped with only one nozzle instead of the two of the original model, suggesting that the Korean variant actually incorporates features of the RD-250 engine, and the copy of the Soviet 4D10 engine, used on the Hwasŏng-10.

It has an estimated range of 3,700 km (2,299 miles) with a 650 kg (1,433 lbs) warhead, 4,500 km (2,796 miles) with a 500 kg (1,102 lbs) warhead, up to a maximum of 6,000 km (3,728 miles) with a lower weight warhead (to be classified as an ICBM it must reach 5,500 km – 3,417 miles thus double identification). Korean sources have presented a nuclear warhead for such a missile that, according to western analysts, could have a power of 1 megaton.

Also a great introduction is the Maneuverable Re-entry Vehicle (MaRV) used to change the trajectory of the warhead in flight when detached from the last stage of the missile. This, driven by a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), dramatically decreases CEP, and also makes the warhead more difficult for adversary radar detectors to intercept.

According to some estimates, the warhead has a speed, during descent, from 15 to 24 Mach (18,375 km/h – 11,509 mph to 29,400 km/h – 18,414 mph).The missile entered service and quickly replaced the Hwasŏng-10 which was plagued by 4D10s engine reliability issues.

Little is known about this missile’s service history apart from that, on 1st January 2023 the Korean leader Kim Jong-un visited the Thaesong Machine Factory (also known as the Jamjin missile factory), located on the western edge of P’yŏngyang. In the images published by the Korean Propaganda Ministry, there are at least 26 Hwasŏng-12 awaiting for final assembly. This meant that the missile is in service and is currently in production.

Images released by DPRK’s Propaganda Ministry on 1st January 2023 showing the North Korean leader accompanied (in second photo) by his daughter Kim Ju-ae inspecting the production lines of Hwasŏng-12 missiles. Source: KCTV https://i.imgur.com/buu8Wvh.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/17GLxwE.jpg Images released by DPRK’s Propaganda Ministry on 1st January 2023 showing the North Korean leader accompanied (in second photo) by his daughter Kim Ju-ae inspecting the production lines of Hwasŏng-12 missiles. Source: KCTV https://i.imgur.com/buu8Wvh.jpg

In 2011, the People’s Republic of China supplied the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea with 8, some sources mention 6, WS51200, super heavy duty trucks. Almost immediately, the UN accused China of militarily supporting the DPRK by violating international embargoes, but China argued that these vehicles were for timber harvesting.

In spite of this defense, the West looked with suspicion at this transaction, expecting something very big in the coming years in the Korean missile program.

The long-awaited moment for analysts came in April 2012, when at the Kim Il-sung 100th Birth Anniversary parade, the mockup of the Hwasŏng-13 (US DoD designation KN-08) three-stage liquid-fuel ICBM was first spotted in 2008.

The Hwasŏng-13 or NK-08 on parade in Kim Il-sung Square in April 2012. The TEL is a WS51200 super heavy duty truck converted by DPRK’s factories into a missile transporter. Source: twitter.com @KPA_bot https://i.imgur.com/xM0inrm.jpeg

The Hwasŏng-13 or NK-08 on parade in Kim Il-sung Square in April 2012. The TEL is a WS51200 super heavy duty truck converted by DPRK’s factories into a missile transporter. Source: twitter.com @KPA_bot https://i.imgur.com/xM0inrm.jpeg

In 2012, it was labeled as part of the disinformation campaign to misdirect Western analysts.

It was later discovered that in fact, the design of this massive three stage missile was slowed down by the problem of the engines being nothing more than two 4D10 engines produced under license and coupled together. In addition to the suspicion of Chinese trucks, the West expected a missile of this size after an engine test occurred at the Sohae Satellite Launching Ground in September 2016.

This system gave many problems as it did on the Hwasŏng-10. It seems that the Koreans have decided to set aside the twin 4D10s in favor of the derivative of the RD-250 engine that generates less power, and decreases the range, but gives less problems in terms of reliability. This missile in the Korean terminology has not changed its name, but has become for the US DoD designation KN-08 Mod. 2 or KN-14. According to estimates, the first model of Hwasŏng-13 with twin engine 4D10s would have a maximum range of 11,500 km (7,145 miles) while the second two stage model has a range of 10,000 km (6,213 miles), placing it under the category of Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles. These are the first Korean ICBMs, and the first Korean missiles capable of threatening the east coast of North America, thus being able to reach far inland cities, like Chicago and Toronto. According to analysts,the range was not wide enough to hit Washington DC with a nuclear warhead presented in March 2016, estimated at 500-700 kg (1,102 – 1,543 lbs) although specifications were never provided by the Koreans.

Kim Jong-un in front of some Hwasŏng-13 warheads in a Korean bunker. On the wall is the motto ‘Advocating and observing the line of Songun with weapons productivity’. Source: twitter.com @KPA_bot https://i.imgur.com/jCIhJ43.jpeg

According to the estimates of Western analysts on the first model, the first stage of the missile (which is the same as the Hwasŏng-12) would have dimensions of 17 meters (55.7 feet), the second about 2 meters (6.56 feet) while the third would have a total size of 1.25 meters (4.10 feet) for a total height of about 20 meters (65.6 feet) while the second model with the RD-250 engine, with only two stages would be shorter reaching a total height of about 16 meters (52.5 feet).

Two-stages Hwasŏng-13s (KN-14) on parade on their new WS51200. Source: prokorea.ru https://i.imgur.com/LZyUnJS.jpg

The Hwasŏng-14 (US DoD designation KN-20) first shown in 2017, has a diameter of 1.7 meters (5.5 feet) and a length of about 19 meters (62.3 feet).With its two stages, it is capable of reaching a range of 10,000 km thus able to hit the east coast of the United States. This missile was developed mostly as a testbed to develop more powerful ICBMs that will later be seen in service with the KPA-SRF. Despite its purpose, it can be armed with a 750 kg nuclear warhead with a power of 1.44 megatons, the same warhead that was tested on 3rd September 2017 during the sixth Korean nuclear test.

The Hwasŏng-14 during the erection on its TE. Source: tg24.sky.it https://i.imgur.com/pXKDLjF.jpg

The two-stage Hwasŏng-15 (US DoD designation KN-22) was, up until 2020, the largest ICBM in the world, with a diameter of more than 2 meters (6.56 feet), and an overall length of about 24 meters (78 feet). It surpasses the Russian RS-24 and the Chinese DF-41 and is capable of carrying a warhead of 1,000 kg therefore, able to carry a warhead of 1.44 megatons as the Hwasŏng-14, or more likely Multiple Re-entry Vehicles (MRV)and several decoys at a range of 13,000 km (8,077 miles), and at a maximum apogee of 4,500 km (2,796 miles).

Other hypotheses are that the missile can be equipped with Multiple Independently-targetable Re-entry Vehicles (MIRVs) that are nuclear (or biological) submunitions and guided by GNSS on to multiple targets. This would allow, for example, to hit more cities on the east coast of the United States, or the capitals of nations in Europe, capable of threatening the most prominent world powers.

The Hwasŏng-15 showed off to the Great Leader. Source: bbc.com https://i.imgur.com/kc6bmEJ.jpg

The first stage of the Hwasŏng-15 has a two-chambered main engine developed by the RD-250 powered by a turbopump to increase thrust at takeoff that missile experts and analysts say increases thrust by 170 percent over the Hwasŏng-14.

The second stage, it is assumed, will be powered by two smaller engines developed in DPRK. Some estimations speculate that the DPRK is in possession of about 40 Hwasŏng-15s thus capable of seriously endangering the many European nations and the United States.

2020s -The Best was not Enough for Kim Jong-un

For Kim Jong-un, the Hwasŏng-15 was not enough, and on 10th October 2020 for the 75th anniversary of the founding of the Workers’ Party of Korea parade, he presented to the world the Hwasŏng-17 (US DoD designation KN-27). Until 24th March 2022, this missile was known in Western nations with the name of Hwasŏng-16. This is because the real name was not revealed by the Koreans until the first launch test took place on that date. Previously, analysts, news outlets, and other enthusiasts fans had named it Hwasŏng-16 continuing the chronological numeration.

This two-stage, liquid-fueled ICBM with a length of 24 to 26 meters (78 to 85 feet) and a diameter of just under 3 meters (9.84 feet) is capable of launching a 2,000 to 3,500 kilogram warhead (2.2 ton to 3.3 ton) at a range, according to some experts, of 13,000 kilometers (8,077 miles).

The Hwasŏng-17 during elevation in the P’yŏngyang International Airport. 24th March 2022. Source: KCTV https://i.imgur.com/Y2gKXum.jpg

Its warhead is supposed to be a series of MRVs or MIRVs, with decoys, representing a threat to nations with anti-ballistic missile programs,such as the United States. Some analysts surmised that such ICBM will retain the same range as the previous Hwasŏng-15, which is enough to hit almost any target on the globe. Its increased size allows it to carry warheads of greater weight, making it significantly more destructive than the previous missile.

Supposedly, the warhead could be: a single one-megaton one or several submunitions of several tens,or hundreds, of kilotons each. To give an idea of the destructive power of such devices, the US atomic bombs that hit Hiroshima and Nagasaki had a power between 15 and 30 kilotons each.In both cases the missile was probably equipped with some decoys to deceive the tracking systems for Anti-Ballistic Missiles.

Because of the missile’s huge diameter, it has also been speculated that the missile’s first stage (approximately 17.5 m – 57.4 feet in length) could accommodate four RD-250 engines, for a power output never before developed for a Korean ICBM. Quoting US and South Korean sources, the Hwasŏng-17 is powered by a mixture of nitrogen tetroxide and Unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine.

While the Hwasŏng-17 seemed to be the apotheosis of North Korean missile power, during the parade for the 75th Anniversary of the founding of the Korean People’s Army on 8th February 2023, the new Hwasŏng-18 was presented to the crowds. The new three stage solid-fuel ICBM has an estimated length of 25 meters (82 feet) and an estimated payload of 1,5 tonnes, and an increased range of 15,000 km (9,320 miles).

The official presentation of the Hwasŏng-18 on 8th February 2023. Source: twitter.com @KPA_bot https://i.imgur.com/zqWDeIS.jpg

The official presentation of the Hwasŏng-18 on 8th February 2023. Source: twitter.com @KPA_bot https://i.imgur.com/zqWDeIS.jpg

The Hwasŏng-18 during launch test on 13th April 2023. Source: KCBC https://i.imgur.com/jURIzuB.jpg

Last but Probably not Latest

On 2nd April 2024 the North Korean technicians tested a new missile of the Hwasŏng-16Na (‘Na’ meaning B in Hangŭl). The Hwasŏng-16Na is the second North Korean hypersonic missile with a Hypersonic Glide Vehicle after the Hwasŏng-8 in 2021. The current information available on the weapon, as of publication, describes the Hwasŏng-16Na as a two-stage solid-fuel missile with a length estimated in 20-21 m and a diameter between 2.1 to 2.3 m. Probably to save up money and development, the two-stages of the Hwasŏng-16Na are the same ones of the Hwasŏng-18.

The Hwasŏng-16Na during test flight of 2nd April 2024. Source: KCNA https://i.imgur.com/3j7umdM.jpeg

Obviously the presence of the ‘B’ in the name makes it plausible that there is another version of this missile but it is not yet confirmed or shown to mass media.

Brief Nomenclature
Name US DoD Designation Other Designations
Hwasŏng-1 FROG-3
Hwasŏng-3 FROG-5
Hwasŏng-4 DF-61
Hwasŏng-5 SS-1C SCUD-B
Hwasŏng-6 SS-1C SCUD-C
Hwasŏng-7 SS-1C SCUD-D Nodong-1

(Rodong-1)

Hwasŏng-9 KN-04 SCUD-ER

SCUD-D
Nodong-1M

(Rodong-1M)

Hwasŏng-10 Nodong-2
(Rodong-2)
Taepodong-X
Musudan
BM-25
Hwasŏng-11 KN-02 Toksa
Hwasŏng-12 KN-17 “The Guam Killer”
Hwasŏng-13 KN-08

KN-08 Mod. 2
KN-14

Hwasŏng-14 KN-20
Hwasŏng-15 KN-22
Hwasŏng-16Na
Hwasŏng-17 KN-28
Hwasŏng-18

DPRK’s TEL, MEL and TEs

The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea has had problems, since the beginning of the development of its missile program, in developing and producing Transporter Erector Launchers, the vehicles for transporting, lifting and launching missiles. The first available were 2P16 TELs on the PT-76 amphibious light tank chassis received from the Soviet Union, along with the 3R9 Luna, 3R10 Luna-2 and 9M21 Luna-M missiles.

A 2P16 TEL with an Hwasŏng-1 SRBM in a exercise filmed by the Korean Central Broadcasting Committee (KCBC). Source: pinterest.com https://i.imgur.com/skX337k.png

It does not appear, from sources, that Korea produced the TEL 2P16 under license, although they were producing the PT-76B amphibious tank under license ,according to Korean sources, since 1967 at the Sinhung Tank Plant.

A 9P113 TEL with a Hwasŏng-3 missile parading through Kim Il-sung Square in P’yŏngyang for the 80th Anniversary of the Kim Il-sung Birthday on 15th April 1992. Source: pinterest.com https://i.imgur.com/mUN0AIR.jpg

Instead, it appears that the Koreans switched to wheeled vehicles such as the TEL 9P113, derived from the Soviet ZIL-135LM heavy duty truck with which they transported the Hwasŏng-1 and Hwasŏng-3, and FROG rockets supplied by the Soviet Union during the 1970s. In that period the DPRK also developed a TEL on a indigenous truck, the Sungri Number 2, a Korean copy of the Soviet KrAZ-255.

North Korean Sungri Number 2 launchers loaded with 2K6 Luna or Hwasŏng-1. Source: KCTV https://i.imgur.com/3SFm367.jpg

As the KrAZ-255, the Sungri 2 was an heavy duty 10-ton 6×6 off-road truck with a 1,486 cm3 engine delivering 240 hp, enough to transport the missiles of the early Hwasŏng series.

This was the first missile carrier developed in North Korea and was for some decades, the only one.

In the following years, with the arrival of the new R-17E Elbrus from Egypt, also came an example of 9P117M1 TEL on the chassis of the Soviet heavy duty truck MAZ-543P. The Korean technicians of the Second Academy of Defense Sciences together with the Korean Workers’ Party Munitions Industry Department through its subordinate Second Economic Committee ( the developer of every other Korean carrier missile to date) tried in every way to copy it, but with poor results until 1984, when the Hwasŏng-5 entered service. Mass production at the Sungri General Automotive Factory, where Korean missile carriers are still produced today, was however very slow to start. To speed up adoption, North Korea bought some Japanese Nissan UD 8×8 or HINO 8×8 trucks from China or Soviet MAZ which were then modified by the Koreans into TELs.

In other cases, vehicles will be produced in Korea but with foreign sourced parts such as Isuzu engines. To fulfill a 1985 Iranian order for a hundred missiles and 12 TELs, both 9P117M1 and modified Nissan UDs were supplied until 1987.

Nissan UD 8×8 TEL with a Hwasŏng-5 missile in Iranian service. Source: The Armored Forces of North Korea https://i.imgur.com/6hVrnWE.jpg

The original MAZ-543P, on which the 9P117 and 9P117M1 TELs were based, according to western sources, were shipped in kits and assembled in Korea.The MAZ-543 was developed by the Belarusian Minsk Prime Mover Plant, weighed 23 tons, and was 11.65 meters (38.2 feet) long, with a fully loaded top speed of about 60 km/h (37 mph) thanks to its 520 hp D12 diesel engine.

North Korean MAZ-543P TELs with Hwasŏng-5 missiles in Kim Il-sung Square in P’yŏngyang. Source: pinterest.com https://i.imgur.com/qt18trT.jpg

Being based on the R-17 SCUD, also the Hwasŏng-9 was transported and launched by a slightly modified MAZ-543P.

A MAZ-543P TEL ready to launch a Hwasŏng-9 during live training. Source: KCTV https://i.imgur.com/1d26isO.jpg

With the presentation of the Hwasŏng-7, a considerably larger weapon than the previous Hwasŏng-5 and -6 missiles, a new version of the 9P117 was introduced. It was modified in Korea and has no official name.

Such a TEL has a fifth axle of rear wheels, lengthening the size of the MAZ-543P by about two meters, from the original 11.65 meters to about 14 meters (46 feet). It does not seem that the last axle is connected to the transmission, transforming the vehicle into an 8×10, and probably decreasing the top speed. It is also noticeable the modification of the erection mechanism, that due to the lengthening of the chassis, has been moved back. These types of modifications allowed North Korean automotive technicians to gain experience in developing and producing heavy trucks, which proved extremely useful in the next decades.

The 10×8 version of the MAZ-543P TEL loaded with second variant of the Hwasŏng-7. Source: KCTV https://i.imgur.com/nwpbOrn.jpg

For the Hwasŏng-10, the TEL used is a Korean variant of the MAZ-547W 12×12 with a launching cab in the center of the chassis, and a modified cockpit with a new top position on the right side of the vehicle. Such modifications, together with the fact that transportation from Belarus, where they are produced, would be impossible without being spotted by Western analysts and satellites, suggests that the DPRK has received them dismantled. The Korean workers had then assembled and modified them independently.

The Hwasŏng-10’s TEL on parade in Kim Il-sung on modified MAZ-547W. Source: edition.cnn.com https://i.imgur.com/G4W9VK9.jpg

After initial testing of the Hwasŏng-10, the Koreans realized that on takeoff, the force and heat generated by the missile damaged the TELs, so steel covers were added to the wheels to prevent extensive damage. These modifications were carried over to only a few TELs while most likely keeping some unchanged for parades, in fact, such vehicles without covers have a more massive and characteristic appearance than the true TELs.

Kim Jong-un salute the crew a Hwasŏng-10 on its MAZ-547W with protection sheets on the wheels after a successful launch. Source: KCNA https://i.imgur.com/lY5ZL3c.jpg

For the Hwasŏng-11, the MAZ-6303 series trucks were used. According to some sources, the vehicles were the MAZ-630308-224 6×6 or MAZ-630308-243 6×4 model produced in Belarus and derived as civilian models later modified in TELs by the North Korean. This showed once again that the DPRK had problems in producing even small TELs in the mid-2000s.

Hwasŏng-11 tactical ballistic missile transported by MAZ-630308s during a parade in P’yŏngyang. Source: missiledefenseadvocacy.org https://i.imgur.com/YY1koH4.jpg

These trucks have however a great advantage, thanks to the smaller dimensions of the Hwasong-11. The missile is kept inside the launcher bay, which opens at the top to erect the launcher rail and the missile along with it. This makes storage and transport safer, and makes the vehicle much more difficult to distinguish from standard transport trucks using spy satellites.

While most of the characteristics of the vehicle remain similar or identical to those of the Belarusian model, the TEL of the Hwasong-11 has a weight of about 14 tons, a 330 hp engine, and a top speed of about 80 km/h (49.7 mph) when fully loaded.

Also used for the Hwasŏng-12, were the same versions of MAZ-547W used for the Hwasŏng-10. This suggest that the Belarusian MAZ trucks were largely sent to the DPRK in the early 2010s to guarantee an adequate number of TELs for the Hwasŏng-12 that is still produced today. It’s also possible that the Koreans slowly started to produce their own copy of this heavy duty truck, probably with the help of Belarusian or Russian technicians.

The Hwasŏng-12 on parade. Its TEL had covers on the wheels to protect them from the heat generated during launch as on the Hwasŏng-10. Source: military-today.com https://i.imgur.com/u9QLxcA.jpg

New WS51200s heavy duty trucks were used for the Hwasŏng-13 and -14. These trucks were supplied by the Chinese and had, in order to circumvent international embargoes on the sale of weapons and military material, the fictitious purpose of transporting wood and were delivered with a red coloration typical of civilian vehicles produced by Wanshan Special Vehicle.

Wanshan WS51200 in its standard red livery. Source: Wanshan Sale Brochure https://i.imgur.com/RJHI9HY.jpg

Subsequently, the KPA has modified these vehicles for the transport of missiles with a hydraulic ramp that rises at 90°. The power developed by the missile’s engines during take-off would destroy or damage a common TEL so the Koreans had to develop an alternative solution, developing it into a Transporter Erector (TE), a vehicle that transports and lifts the missile but is not able to launch it. This would mean that the missile would have to be launched only in certain positions easily detectable by western satellites. This is why the majority of North Korean missiles, from Hwasŏng-13 onwards, have a launching pad that allows the crews a margin of maneuver on where to launch the missile, and are able to launch the missiles on unprepared terrain, and not from fixed launching positions.

The pads used to elevate the missiles and block them in elevated positions. Source: pinterest.com https://i.imgur.com/WiXbjaS.jpg

The pad is erected together with the missile by the TE erection system, which then moves away. Once the commissioning operations are completed, the missile is then launched.

Another positive side of TEs is that in case of an enemy attack on the launch site, the missile carrier is not involved in the launch, improving its chance to remain unharmed, and to be used in other launches.

The WS51200 is a heavy duty truck produced by Wanshan Special Vehicle of Wanshan in China based on trucks developed by MAZ and MZKT such as the MAZ-7912 and MZKT-79221. This 20-meter-long 8-axle truck weighs 42 tons and is capable of carrying up to a maximum of about 45-50 tons of cargo.

It is equipped with Cummins Diesel KTTA19-C700, a 6-cylinder in-line engine with an output of 700 hp at 2,100 rpm 19,000 cm³. It is equipped with a direct injection pump, with a weight of 2,073 kg (4,570 lbs), and a fuel tank that can hold approximately 800 liters. At full load, its consumption is estimated at 300 liters per 100 kilometers, more or less like a MZKT-79221. Although some sources claim that this vehicle, thanks to the Cummins engine, has a range of 1,000 kilometers without specifying whether full load or not.

The power of the engine allows this juggernaut to travel at a maximum speed of 60 km/h when unloaded. Of the eight axles, the first three are steerable, the last three are counter steerable, and all six are traction, allowing the vehicle a reduced turning radius.

One of Kim Jong-il’s last public appearances before his death on 17th December 2011. Clearly visible behind him is a WS51200 still in civilian livery equipped with the Hwasong-13 missile mockup. Source: pinterest.com https://i.imgur.com/ukvcWpc.jpg

For the massive Hwasŏng-15, at least four WS51200s have been modified in Korea by removing the hydraulic missile lift system, the instrument panel, and cockpit and replacing them with new models. More importantly, a ninth wheel axle was added between the sixth and seventh front wheel axles, making it the largest ICBMs transport vehicle in the world, as well as the only TE ever made with 9 axles. Although the traction was changed from 16×12 to 18×12 it seems that the original engine remained unchanged, thus decreasing the TE’s top speed.

The modified WS51200 TE for the Hwasŏng-15. Source: bulgarianmilitary.com https://i.imgur.com/GZ15PEh.jpg

It can be assumed that perhaps more WS51200s were supplied from China, or that Korea started to produce them under license. Analysts, after seeing the modification to the Chinese heavy duty truck, assumed that in the future Korea would also eventually display independently produced heavy duty TEs, and so it happened in 2020.

An 11-axle Transporter Erector appeared for the Hwasŏng-17, a unique vehicle capable of carrying the missile with estimated weight between 80 and 150 tons. It is as of publication, the largest TEL in the world.

The 11-axles TEL of the behemoth Hwasŏng-17 during the parade on 10th October 2020. Source: frontierindia.com https://i.imgur.com/ufR6BUF.jpg

Given the remarkable strides made by the Korean industry, it is likely that this new heavy duty truck will be manufactured in Korea. This is confirmed in more recent years by the appearance of the new TEL for the Hwasŏng-18, a 9 axle truck that seems to be assembled in North Korea. The Hwasŏng-16Na TEL had similar characteristics to the Hwasŏng-18’s one but is shorter, with just 7 axles instead of 9. It also had a curious shaped cover for the Hypersonic glide vehicle fixed on the TEL’s cab. Both models seem derived from Chinese trucks but produced in North Korea. As satellite images suggest, at the Kusong Tank Production plants in the past years , new facilities were created to assemble these heavy trucks.

Kim Jong-un and his daughter reaching the observation point before the Hwasŏng-18 launch test. In the background, the new North Korean-produced TEL with a protective tube. Source: KCTV https://i.imgur.com/vGiVYoL.jpg
Kim Jong-un reaching a safe area from which supervise the Hwasŏng-16Na launch test on 2nd April 2024. As clearly visible, the launching area is the same of the previous Hwasŏng-18 test. Note the curious shaped cover for the HGV warhead. Source: KCNA https://i.imgur.com/Vdq7Thg.jpeg

The number of TELs available to North Korea has roughly doubled in recent years, but that’s not the end of the story. The DPRK is currently decommissioning its “Soviet” TEL models, their heavy duty trucks with eight or more axles. These are heavy, and hard to produce and maintain in service. The Kim’s nation now has its attention on the MEL (Mobile Erector Launcher) models, a prime mover that pulls a trailer or a semitrailer on which the missile is mounted. These models, much more similar to the Chinese Dōngfēng carrier series than to the Soviet/Russian ones, entered service only in recent years.

 

Two examples of MELs in service with the Korean People’s Army. The first ones showing off an unknown type of missiles known as ICBM-1 and the second is loaded with a Submarine-Launched Ballistic Missile. In the last case, the vehicle is used only to show the missile in a parade. Sources: pinterest.com and Alamy.com https://i.imgur.com/qvEaWeT.jpg & https://i.imgur.com/JiIwQ3s.jpg

In the last period, a TEL very similar to the Chinese DF-31, has been seen with a 6×4 prime mover and a 3-axle semi-trailer. It has been speculated that the prime mover used by the Korean People’s Army Strategic Rocket Force is a licensed copy, or a Korean modification of the Chinese HOWO T7H civilian prime mover. If the Korean version has similar characteristics to the Chinese one, the engine will be a copy of the MAN MC11 6-cylinder in-line diesel engine, 440 hp, 10,518 cm³ with a manual gearbox with 16 gears and a fuel tank capacity of 600 liters. Tire size 315/80R22.5, a net weight of 9,500 kg (20,944 lbs) and a maximum load of 55,000 kg (60.62 tons).A South Korean source says that this vehicle is a TIR version of the 6×6 Taebaeksan-96 licensed copy of the 6×6 KamAZ-55111 truck. This TIR is said to be a joint civilian truck project developed between Russia and Korea, and after producing a few examples with Russia, Korea exported them back home and converted them into MELs without informing the Russians.

These MELs are easier to produce, easier to maintain, are easier to conceal, and are cheaper, necessary for an industry like Korea that, until the late 2010s, had difficulty producing heavy duty missile carriers on its own. Some were used in multiple parades to show Kim Jong-un and the Korean population Submarine Launched Ballistic Missiles, and therefore not launchable from TELs or MELs, such as the Pukguksong. Others were equipped with canisters of about 2 meters in diameter, and therefore are unable to carry the latest ICBMs of the Hwasŏng series, while others have been seen carrying Hwasŏng-14, and not being able to launch them. It is assumed that they are not used by the KPA only as parade vehicles, but can also act as “ammunition carriers” following the TEs,reloading them after the first launch.

Another example of missile carriers used by the DPRK are tracked TELs on tank chassis which, although it seems anachronistic, the DPRK has less difficulty in producing instead of standard wheeled TELs. The advantages of the TELs on tank chassis are, first of all, the ease of production compared to the production of TELs of Belarusian or Chinese origin, and allow for the possibility to cross rougher terrain that wheeled vehicles cannot overcome, thus increasing the number of launch sites and making it more difficult for spy satellites to identify all the favorable positions.

Tracked TELs for Pukguksong-2 or KN-15, it is not of the Hwasŏng missiles family. Source: twitter.com @KPA_bot https://i.imgur.com/K6v4VHt.jpeg

The disadvantages with respect to wheeled TELs are that the increased vibrations of a tracked chassis, that could damage the sensitive electronics of Korean missiles, and the creation of a new tracked vehicle production line that could slow down the already slow Ch’ŏnma and Songun-915 production lines.

These TELs are a good idea if they are converted from old disused tank hulls, as the Soviet Union did in the 1960s by converting the now obsolete IS-2 Mod. 1944 into renamed 2P19 TELs that mounted R-17 Elbrus missiles, and became the 8U218 missile complex.

 

The experienced crews of these TELs and TEs are considered invaluable by the KPA and prior to each test launch they are removed to a safe distance along with their vehicles to avoid losing them in accidents. Training such crews requires time and obviously a very high cost and it is not easy for Korea to replace them or their carriers in case of an accident, even now that Korea has reached a certain autonomy in the production of missile carriers.

Export

Although the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea is often referred to as the “Hermit Kingdom” by the Western media, Korea has more exports than can be expected, in 1985 it signed a contract with Iran for the purchase of an unspecified number of Hwasŏng-5 ranging (according to western sources) from a minimum of 90 to a maximum of 100, and 12 TELs for a total of 500 million USD. Part of the deal was also to help Iran develop its own production line for the autonomous production of SRBMs. The first missiles arrived in Iran in 1985, beginning a reverse engineering program that led the Iranians to produce their first copy of the Hwasŏng-5, the Shahab-1 in 1987. By the same year, all missiles and TELs ordered by Iran had been delivered.

Iranian Shahab-1 on its particularly camouflaged TEL near a camouflaged civilian SUV. Source: oryxblog.com https://i.imgur.com/oT4IBVD.jpeg

Two years later, in 1989, the United Arab Emirates purchased a number of Hwasŏng-5 and some MLRS but due to “unsatisfactory quality” according to some sources or, due to US pressure according to other sources, decommissioned them very quickly.

A Hwasŏng-5 on a MAN KAT-1 TEL in service with the United Arab Emirates army. Source: oryxspioenkop.com https://i.imgur.com/4aGq0bh.jpg

In 2008, Myanmar and the DPRK signed a contract for a missile technology transfer so that Myanmar could also develop its own missile program. According to some analysts, and the People’s Republic of China, the DPRK delivered the Hwasŏng-5 to Myanmar to familiarize themselves with the operation of the missiles. The North Korean-Myanmar relationship was confirmed by the weapon’s arrival in Myanmar’s harbors, with the merchant ships being loaded not only with missiles, but also small arms and artillery rockets.

The Hwasŏng-6 was exported to Iran in the latter half of the 1980s, before being studied and then produced under license under the name of Shahab-2 from 1990 onwards.

In January 1993, General Mohsen Rezaee Commander of Iranian Revolution Guard Corps went to P’yŏngyang to sign a 2.7 billion dollars contract purchasing 300 Korean SRBMs for Iranian oil.

The Shahab-2 SRBM on a one-axle trailer used only to transport it. Source: missilethreat.csis.org https://i.imgur.com/qM6Jc81.png

A few Hwasŏng-6 were sent to Syria to be studied and produced under license with the support of the People’s Republic of China. In 1996, some Syrian technicians went to Korea for 2 weeks to study missile development techniques directly from Korean technicians.

Some missiles have been supplied to Yemen since the 1990s. In 2002, the North Korean merchant ship ‘So San’ was boarded in the Arabian Sea, after being detained by Spanish and US warships. In the cargo bay, covered by bags of concrete, there were 15 Hwasŏng-5 or 6 SRBMs. However the US did not have the authority to seize the cargo and the ship docked in Yemen. This was not the only North Korean merchant ship who arrived in Yemen, and in the years to follow, some unconfirmed sources claimed a total number of 45 North Korean Hwasŏngs arrived in Yemen.

The So San merchant ship was seized by Spanish and US forces in 2002. Source: pinterest.com https://i.imgur.com/OzqNfbt.jpeg

 

In 2009, some Hwasŏng-6 were supplied to Myanmar for the development of its own variant but nothing is known about this deal. According to SIPRI, the Socialist Republic of Vietnam purchased a total of 25 Hwasŏng-6 in 1997. An unsurprising development as Vietnam has a limited missile arsenal, and is unable to produce them. Unfortunately, no other news about their service is available. To date, the only Vietnamese unit using ballistic missiles is the 490th Missile Brigade, which had in service not only the Hwasŏng-6, but also the Soviet R-17 Elbrus variants known in west as SCUD-B and SCUD-C, fielding an unknown number of examples. For what is currently known, Vietnam is only equipped with conventional high-explosive warheads, and as Army Recognition and Defence Leaders reports, in 2023, Vietnam started upgrading its SCUD fleet with “foreign partners” to reduce the missile’s original CEP.

Members of the 490th Missile Brigade with a Soviet SCUD or Hwasŏng-6 during a SCUD missile positioning training. Source: twitter.com @AnnQuann https://i.imgur.com/nGStA1F.jpg

In 1999, according to US intelligence, Pakistan signed a contract with the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea for the development of a MRBM.Beginning in 1993, some North Korean scientists and engineers arrived in Pakistan and began working with the Pakistani Khan Research Laboratories (KRL) to aid in the development of a new MRBM. The work proceeded expeditiously, though against strong international pressure for the Pakistanis to give up Korean aid.

The Pakistani Ghauri-I missile with the crew lined up. Source: defencetalk.com https://i.imgur.com/GYn3EKh.jpeg

In April 1998, the first launch of the missile was made 120 km from Islamabad. The Ghauri reached 350 km of apogee but during the re-entry, the conical nose of the missile melted due to the heat and the test failed. The new Pakistani administration, under international pressure, exploited the failure of the test, kicking North Korean missile engineers out of the country and ordering the KRL to continue development.

By 2003, the tests were completed and the missile, with the name Ghauri-I, officially entered service with the Pakistan Army. The Ghauri-I had a maximum range of 1,500 km, a payload of 750 kg of conventional explosive or nuclear warhead and a total weight of 15.8 tonnes. It is estimated that Pakistan has 30 Ghauri-I missiles in service and the tests of the newer all-Pakistani variant occurred in 2004, 2010, 2012 and 2015. The Circular Error Probable (CEP) is estimated at 190 meters. Now, the Ghauri-I is substituted in first strike units from its upgraded versions: the Ghauri-II and Ghauri-III.

The Ghauri-I on a semi-trailer used to present it to the public in a parade in Islamabad in the early 2000s. Source: X.com https://i.imgur.com/3YVgh57.jpeg

In the 1990s, Iran also began to develop its own version of the missile nicknamed Shahab-3, which was tested from 1998, and entered service in 2003. There are four different versions of this missile, the first one is not very different from the original Korean version, while the last one has a range of 2,000 km (1,242 miles) and a warhead composed of 5 submunitions of 280 kg each (617 lbs).

The Shahab-3 missile towed by an Iranian developed MEL. Source: fdd.org https://i.imgur.com/AOsJCzQ.jpeg

Egypt and Libya have also had or have in service a number of Hwasŏng-7. Of the Egyptian missiles not much is known, while the Libyan ones were dismantled in 2003 when dictator Mu’ammar Gaddafi agreed to the disarmament of most of the weapons of mass destruction in his country. Some analysts were skeptical of the complete destruction of this arsenal but, there is no evidence of Hwasŏng-7 launches during the Libyan Civil War or subsequent fighting between Libyan militias, therefore, we can assume that Libyan Hwasŏng were all destroyed by 2004.

Not a single Hwasŏng-9 has been exported beyond the Korean borders, while the last missile known to have been exported is the Hwasŏng-10.Some sources and rumors have claimed that the Hwasŏng-10 has been sold to Iran. It is correct to say that such a missile has been proposed for export, in fact in the report of a Myanmar delegation that visited several military facilities and factories in the DPRK in 2008, made a reference to a SCUD-F with a range of 3,000 kilometers. This more or less confirms the maximum range of the Hwasŏng-10, and also that such a missile has been proposed for export.

In 2010, it seems that Iran has purchased 19 Hwasŏng-10 missiles according to a leaked classified report from the US State Department, even if the number has never been confirmed, and at first it was thought that this information was false since Iran did not show anything similar until 2017. In January, an MRBM with similar characteristics to the Korean missile nicknamed by the Iranians Khorramshahr, from the name of an Iranian city, was tested. According to some analysts this missile is the direct descendant of the Hwasong-10.

The Iranian Khorramshahr Medium Range Ballistic Missile showed in an Iranian parade in Theran loaded on a MEL with IVECO prime mover. Source: wikipedia.com https://i.imgur.com/r7fkaa8.jpeg

In the 2000s, Saddam Hussein’s Iraq bought parts of Korean missiles in order to integrate them into their missile development. A 9 million USD contract was purchased for parts such as guidance and control systems, inertial navigation systems, on-board computers, gyroscopes, and accelerometers that were probably used on the Al-Fat’h and Al-Samud missiles. The parts were taken by ship to Syria and from there were delivered to the Iraqis. It does not appear that any Korean parts were found in any of the Iraqi missile facilities by the US in 2003 during Operation Iraqi Freedom, so either they never arrived in Iraq or the Iraqis had already integrated them.

Al-Samud SRBM of the Iraqi Army. Source: b14643.de https://i.imgur.com/hF8nkc7.jpeg

Brief Korean Hwasŏng Tests

The first documented North Korean missile test occurred in 1984 when the Hwasŏng-5 was successfully tested while a few years later the Hwasŏng-6 was tested.

In 1990 the Hwasŏng-7 was tested for the first time, resulting in a successful launch test. On 29th-30th May 1993, another missile test of the Hwasŏng-7 was conducted and launched from the Hwadae missile base near Wonsan in the Sea of Japan to demonstrate it to the Iranian delegation that had come to Korea.

In 1994 Kim Il-sung, father of the nation, died. Under his government, in 9 years a total of 15 missile tests were made, of which only the one in 1993 created international problems.

Since 1994 and under Kim Jong-il, there have been 16 missile tests, in 2005 some SRBMs of the Hwasŏng series were launched in the Sea of Japan causing alarm among Western analysts.

Between the 2nd and 4th of July 2009, a total of 9 Short-Range Ballistic Missiles and two Hwasŏng-7 were launched into the Sea of Japan in violation of a UN Security Council resolution. The incident created minimal international tension with the Republic of Korea, the United States, Japan, Russia and China condemning such provocative testing.

With the death of Kim Jong-il in December 2011, there has been an increase in terms of Korean missile tests, in fact, from 1984 to 2011 31 missile tests were carried out against 119 tests carried out by Kim Jong-un, third of the Kim dynasty from 2011 until 2022. (in this number are counted also tests of missiles not belonging to the Hwasŏng series)

Between 18th and 20th May 2013, a couple of weeks after the issuance of the sentence to the US student Kenneth Bae arrested months earlier, Korea began another provocation by launching a total of six Hwasŏng-11 in the Sea of Japan.

On 27th February 2014, five Short-Range Ballistic Missiles were launched from Kittaeryong Missile Base in protest of joint exercises between the US Army and the Republic Of Korea Army. On 3rd March of the same year, two SRBMs were launched from Wonsan Kalma International Airport likely to test the ability to launch missiles from airstrips.

On 26th March 2014, in conjunction with an International meeting in Netherlands to discuss the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s nuclear threat, as a show of force the DPRK launched 2 Hwasŏng-7s. These missiles flew about 500 km (310 miles) into the Sea of Japan.

From 26th-29th June 2014, North Korea launched three SRBMs into the Sea of Japan landing them near the sea border with South Korea. Between 2nd and 13th July of the same year, South Korea and Japan accused the DPRK of launching six SRBMs in three separate dual launches and then crashing them into the Sea. The missiles were launched from Kaesong and Hwangju.

On 14th August 2014 a Hwasŏng-11 was launched from Wonsan while Pope Francis was visiting South Korea. In September, another Hwasŏng-11 was launched from Wonsan.

On 8th February 2015, five Short-Range Ballistic Missiles were launched into the Sea of Japan; they flew less than 200 km (124 miles) before crashing into the sea.

On March 2, SRBMs were launched into the sea as a protest to a large joint military exercise between Republic Of Korea Army and US Army. On the 5th of April, SRBMs were launched from the West Coast into the Yellow Sea; the missiles flew about 100 km (62 miles).

In 2016, several missile tests were reported, the first one was on February 7, when both South Korea and Japan detected a missile of unknown model, probably a Hwasŏng-9 from the Dongchang-ri launch site, neither South Korea nor Japan released more details.

On March 10 the DPRK launched two Short-Range Ballistic Missiles which flew about 350 km (217 miles) and crashed into the sea. On 18th March 2016 two Hwasŏng-7 were launched traveling about 600 km (372 miles) before crashing.

On 15th April 2016 the Hwasŏng-10 was tested for the first time but the test was a failure.

On 18th April and 31st May there were tests of 3 more Hwasŏng-10 without success.

On 22nd June 2016 there was the first successful missile test of the Hwasŏng-10, the missile reached an altitude of over 700 km (434 miles) and then fell into the sea.

On 18th July 2016, two SRBMs (probably Hwasŏng-6) and one Hwasŏng-7 were launched into the Sea of Japan.

On 2nd August 2016, 2 Hwasŏng-7 were launched of which one flew 1,000 km (621 miles) and ended up in the Exclusive Economic Zone of Japan. In September, a few SRBMs were launched to coincide with the end of the G20 that year.

In October 2 more Hwasŏng-10 tests failed.

In March 2017, four Hwasŏng-6 modified to have increased range, were tested by launching them towards Japan crashing 250 km (155 miles) off the Japanese coast.

On 22th March Hwasŏng-10 was tested again, the test failed.

On 5th April 2017 a Hwasŏng-12 was tested which, launched from Simpo Base flew about 50 km (31 miles) before crashing into the ocean.

On 16th April another Hwasŏng-12 was tested from Simpo Base, the launch failed on takeoff.

On 29th April, another Hwasŏng-12 missile exploded during a test.

On 15th May 2017, another Hwasŏng-12 was tested, this time successfully, the missile flew nearly 500 km (310 miles) crashing into the Sea of Japan.

On 29th May, an SRBM was launched.

On 4th June the Hwasŏng-14, the first North Korean ICBM tested, was successfully tested, another test on 28th 2017 June was again a success, flying the missile for 45 minutes.

In August other tests were done, the first one on 25th August where three SRBMs were launched and the second one on the 28th when a missile, probably Hwasŏng-12 flew 2,000 km (1,242 miles) over Japan at 400 km (248 miles) altitude. Always in 2017 a missile Hwasong-15 flew for 53 minutes at an altitude of about 4,475 km (2,780 miles) and with a range of 950 km (590 miles).

In 2018, there was a pause in missile launches given the rapprochement of international relations between South Korea, DPRK, and the United States with the Summit between the US President Donald J. Trump and Korean leader Kim Jong-un in Singapore on 12th June 2018.

Kim Jong-un and Donald J. Trump shaking hands during the 12th June 2018 Singapore summit. Source: Shealah Craighead https://i.imgur.com/Lo4M42x.jpeg

Due to the failure of the second summit between the two on 28th February 2019 in Hanoi, Vietnam, missile testing resumed.

On 4th May 2019 some Short-Range Ballistic Missiles were tested, ending up in the Sea of Japan.

In the following months more missiles were tested, dozens of KN-23 Short-Range Ballistic Missiles, and a Pukguksong-3 Submarine Launched Ballistic Missile in October.

In 2020 due to the Covid-19 pandemic testing was less sparse within testing of a few SRBMs in March.

On 21st March 2021 another test of two missiles, probably Hwasŏng-11 was successfully completed.

On 24th March 2022, when nearly all the western media outlets were focused on the Russo-Ukrainian war, tests of the new Hwasŏng-17 were carried out at the presence of the Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un.In this test, the Hwasŏng-17 was launched by its TE from the P’yŏngyang International Airport, where it flew for 67.5 minutes at a distance of 1,090 km (677 miles) and at a maximum altitude of 6,248.5 km (3,882 miles) and accurately hit a target in the sea, near Aomori, Japan, as reported by North Korean Central National Television. This information was confirmed by Japan and South Korea’s analysts, which note that this is the longest North Korean launch ever, even more than North Korea’s last ICBM test in 2017.

The Hwasŏng-17 during erection on the 24th March 2022 on one of the P’yŏngyang International Airport’s auxiliary airstrips. Source: KCNA https://i.imgur.com/knABqw6.jpeg

The Hwasŏng-17 during erection on the 24th March 2022 on one of the P’yŏngyang International Airport’s auxiliary airstrips. Source: KCNA https://i.imgur.com/knABqw6.jpeg

On 26th November 2023, after a complex period for the Democratic People Republic of Korea, North Korean Leader Kim Jong-un participated to view an Hwasŏng-17 launch. On this occasion, he also presented to the North Korean population and to the world his young daughter, Kim Ju-ae.

The North Korean Central National Television claimed that in the test, the Hwasŏng-17 had flown for 999,2 km (620 miles) with an apogee of over 6,000 km and for a flight time of 68 minutes.

On 2nd April 2024 the Hwasŏng-16Na was first flight tested. According to North Korean sources it flew for 1,000 km in 10 minutes (6,000 km/h) whileaccording to South Korean sources the maximum distance was 600 km. Japanese reported an altitude of 650 km beingreached, and confirmed a maximum apogee reached of 101 km. After reaching the maximum apogee, the glide vehicle flew to a height of 72.3 km, the first to land in the Japanese Sea (this was also confirmed by Japanese sources).

The Hwasŏng-16Na being erected on 2nd April 2024. In the foreground Kim Jong-un and General Jang Chang-ha, head of the Missile General Bureau. Source: KCNA https://i.imgur.com/EhSG14q.jpeg

The total number of tests in this list are only tests of Hwasŏng series missiles.

From 1984 to 2021, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea conducted 151 missile tests including Hwasŏng series missiles, Submarine Launched Ballistic Missiles, space launches, and other land-based missiles not part of the Hwasŏng series.In 37 years, 15 tests were completed under Kim Il-sung’s government, 16 under Kim Jong-il and a total of 120 under Kim Jong-un’s government for an 80% of missile tests in the last 10 years.

North Korean Hwasŏng-3 loaded on a Soviet-produced 9P113 Transporter Erector Launcher.

North Korean Hwasŏng-5 loaded on a Belarusian-produced 9P117M1 Transporter Erector Launcher.

North Korean Hwasŏng-6 loaded on a Belarusian-produced 9P117M1 Transporter Erector Launcher.

North Korean Hwasŏng-7 (second version) loaded on a Belarusian-produced 9P117M1 Transporter Erector Launcher modified in North Korea to fit the new missile.

North Korean Hwasŏng-11 loaded on a Belarusian-produced MAZ-630308 Transporter Erector Launcher.

Illustrations

North Korean Hwasŏng-3 loaded on a Soviet-produced 9P113 Transporter Erector Launcher.

 

 

 

 

 

 

North Korean Hwasŏng-5 loaded on a Belarusian-produced 9P117M1 Transporter Erector Launcher.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North Korean Hwasŏng-6 loaded on a Belarusian-produced 9P117M1 Transporter Erector Launcher.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North Korean Hwasŏng-7 (second version) loaded on a Belarusian-produced 9P117M1 Transporter Erector Launcher modified in North Korea to fit the new missile.

North Korean Hwasŏng-11 loaded on a Belarusian-produced MAZ-630308 Transporter Erector Launcher.

Credits

Written by Arturo Giusti

Edited by Henry H.

Illustrated by Carpaticus

Sources:

The Armed Forces of North Korea, On The Path Of Songun – Stijn Mitzer & Joost Oliemans

Reuters; various

autoopt.ru; Product Catalog

sinotruk.com; Product Catalog

missilethreat.csis.org

Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the Director of Central Intelligence on Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction, 30 September 2004, Volume 2 – Central Intelligence Agency

Korean People’s Army Journal Volume 1 Number 2 – Joseph S. Bermudez Jr.

 

Re.2000 (J20) In Swedish Service

sweden flag Sweden (1941)
Fighter – 60 Aircraft

To protect their airspace as the Second World war ravaged Europe, Sweden wanted to acquire more modern fighters. Initially, they purchased American fighters, but the few they could order  were insufficient and would be soon out of date. Luckily for Sweden,  Italy was in short supply of vital metal ore, so it was that the Swedish Air Force managed to acquire 60 Re.2000 fighters. These were immediately put to service and proved to be the best fighters that Sweden had in its inventory during the war.

J20 (Re.2000) in Swedish service. Source: www.destinationsjourney.com

History

As the war in Europe broke out in 1939, Sweden tried to use its geopolitical and geographic position to remain neutral. Despite its neutral position, it still needed to acquire weapons and other pieces of military equipment to protect its border in case of any potential attack. Just as the war in Europe started,  Sweden’s military officials purchased 120 P-35 Seversky fighters from the US to strengthen its air force. The first contingent of 60 aircraft reached Sweden in early 1940. The second group never reached Sweden, as the US Government canceled this agreement.

Despite ordering 120 P-35 Seversky fighters only half that number ever reached Sweden. Source: comandosupremo.com

The Swedish Armed Forces, not wanting to be left defenseless against an enemy air force, instead approached the Italians. Luckily for them, the Italians had developed and produced the Re.2000 which was essentially an improved copy of the US P-35. The Swedish government requested the purchase of 60 aircraft of this type. The official agreement was signed on the 28th of November 1940. As payment, Sweden agreed to give the Italians vital ore resources such as chrome and nickel.

Through Italy, Sweden managed to acquire 60 Re.2000 fighter aircraft in 1941. Source:www.destinationsjourney.com

Re.2000 Brief Development History 

In 1938, the development of the Re.2000 by Reggiane began at the request of the Italian Aviation Ministry. The Italian Air Force at that time wanted to introduce more modern, low-wing fighters. By then, several different fighter designs were in various states of development. Reggiane formed a team of engineers with the aim of creating such a fighter, led by the Technical Director Antonio Alessio, and Engineer Roberto Longhi. Due to a lack of time to design an aircraft from the ground up, a solution was made to utilize some elements of the design of the US Seversky P-35. The main reason why the Re.2000 was influenced by this US design was Roberto Longhi. He had spent some time working in the aviation industry in America before returning to Italy in 1936. While the two planes look very similar, there were some differences, like the cockpit, and landing gear. Due to the lack of interest of the Italian Air Force Officials, fewer than 170 aircraft of this type would be produced. Most were exported, and only small quantities of this fighter were ever operated by the Italian Air Force.

 

Italian Re.2000 fighter. Source: www.warbirdphotographs

In Swedish service 

The first Re.2000 reached Sweden in 1941. It was disassembled and then transported by rail through Germany and finally to Sweden. Once there, it was transported to the Swedish Air Force central workshop at Malment to be reassembled, after which the first trial and evaluation flights were carried out in September 1941. Once all 60 arrived, these were allocated to the F 10 Kung. Skanska Flyglottiljen (Eng. Fighter wing) unit. Their primary base of operation was the airfields at Bulltofta and Rinkaby. In Swedish Service, the Re.2000s were renamed to J20. The ‘J’ stands for Jacktplan, meaning a fighter. These received serial numbers from 2301 to 2360. The last two digits of these numbers were painted (in white color) on the aircraft tails and engine.

In general, the overall flight performance of the J20 was deemed sufficient. Its greatest downside was its poor mechanical reliability, and the difficulty in maintaining its engine. The Italians never tested the Re.2000’s performance in a cold climate, as it was intended for service in the Mediterranean. Because of this, the Swedish maintenance crews had to find out the hard way that the aircraft was simply not suited for the cold climate in the North. Trouble starting the engine in cold weather would prove a common, and frustrating exercise.

The J20 mainly saw service in the role of the interceptor. Their job was to intercept any aircraft that came near Sweden’s airspace. These were in the majority of cases, damaged Allied aircraft that were returning from bombing raids in  Germany. On rare occasions, some German aircraft would lose their way and be intercepted by the J20. The interception operations were not intended to engage incoming aircraft but to simply escort them to the Bulltofta airfield, where the plane and its crew would be interred.

During the war, some 16 J20s were lost in various accidents but only one was shot down in combat. During a routine patrol on the 3rd of April 1945, a J20 piloted by Erik Nordlund spotted a German Do 24 aircraft that was flying near Nahobukten. As the J20 approached the German plane it was hit by 2 cm cannon rounds. While the pilot disengaged and tried to fly back, the engine exploded in midair, destroying the aircraft and killing the pilot. The J20s that survived the war remained in the inventory of the Sweden Air Force up to 1955 before being finally removed from service.

Besides their national marking, the Swedish added two large two-digit designations to the J20. These large numbers were painted in white color. Source: www.destinationsjourney.com

Surviving aircrafts

Most were either lost or scrapped, and today, only one J20 is preserved. It is currently exhibited at the Swedish Air Force Museum at Linkoping.

The preserved Swedish J20 fighter (serial number 2340). Source: plasticfantastique.com

Technical characteristics

The Re.2000 was designed as a low-wing, mixed-construction, single-seat fighter plane. The fuselage consisted of a round frame covered with a metal sheet held in place using flush-riveting. The Re.2000 wings had a semi-elliptical design, with five spars covered with stressed skin. The central part of the wing held two integral fuel tanks. The tail section had a metal construction with the controls covered with fabric.

The landing gear system was unusual. When it retracted, it rotated 90° (a copy from the Curtiss model) before it entered the wheel bays. For better landing handling, the landing gear was provided with hydraulic shock absorbers and pneumatic brakes. The smaller rear wheel was also retractable and could be steered.

The Re.2000 engine was the Piaggio P.XI R.C.40 14-cylinder air-cooled radial engine, providing 985 hp, equipped with a three-blade variable pitch propeller made by Piaggio.

The cockpit canopy opened to the rear and the pilot had a good overall view of the surroundings. For pilot protection, a 8 mm (0.3 in) thick armor plate was placed behind the seat.

The Re.2000 possessed weak offensive capabilities, as it was armed with only two Breda-Safat 12.7 mm (0.5 in) heavy machine guns. The machine guns were installed in the forward front fuselage and fired through the propeller arc. For each machine gun, 300 ammunition rounds were provided. The Re.2000 also had two small bomb bays placed in each central wing section. Each bomb bay had a payload of twenty-two 2 kg (4.4 lb) anti-personnel or incendiary bombs.

Conclusion

The J20 was the best fighter in service within the Swedish Air Force. It was noted that during its service it possessed good overall flight characteristics. There were several issues with its maintenance, but this was mainly attributed to the cold Scandinavian Climate.  In conclusion, while not the best fighter of the Second World War, for the country as Sweden it was more than enough to protect its airspace.

Re.2000 Specifications  

Wingspans 11 m  / 36 ft
Length 8 m  / 26 ft 5 in
Height 3.15 m  / 10 ft 4 in
Wing Area 20.4 m² /  220 ft²
Engine One Piaggio P.XI RC.40 985 hp
Empty Weight 2,460 kg   / 5,424  lbs
Maximum Takeoff Weight 3,240 kg   / 7,140  lbs
Climb Rate to 6 km 6 minutes 10 seconds
Maximum Speed 515 km/h  / 320 mph
Cruising speed 450 km/h / 280 mph
Range 840 km / 520 miles
Maximum Service Ceiling 11,500 m /  34,450 ft
Crew 1 pilot
Armament
  • Two 0.5 in (12.7 mm) heavy machine guns
  • 44 kg bombs
Swedish J 20 (Re.2000) with 42 marking number

Credits:

  • Written by Marko P.
  • Edited by Henry H.
  • Illustration by Pavel

Source:

  • G. Punka (2001) Reggiane Fighters in Action, Squadron/signal publication
  • D. Nešić  (2008)  Naoružanje Drugog Svetsko Rata-Italija. Beograd.
  • D. Monday (2006) The Hamlyn Concise Guide To Axis Aircraft OF World War II, Bounty Books
  • M. D. Terlizzi. (2002). Reggiane Re 2000: Falco, Heja, J.20. IBN
  • G. Cattaneo () The Reggiane Re.2000, Profile Publication

 

Junkers Ju 88S

Nazi Germany (1943)

Medium Bomber, Pathfinder: 362 Built

The fastest variant of the Ju 88, the S featured a massive increase in engine power and numerous aerodynamic improvements. (beeldbank)

The Junkers Ju 88 was among the most versatile and longest serving aircraft of the Second World War, and can be counted among the very few that weren’t completely obsolete at the end of hostilities. A modern design in the days preceding the war, it was intended to become the primary medium bomber in Luftwaffe service. In the following years, it to was to be replaced by the more modern Ju 288. However, production shortfalls made phasing out the dated Heinkel 111 unfeasible, and the Ju 288 would never see service, for a multitude of technical reasons. It thus fell on Junkers to keep the Ju 88 updated through the end of the war, producing a number of bombers, fighters, night fighters, and reconnaissance aircraft to service in whatever roles were needed. Among the last of these variants was the Ju 88S, which sought to produce the fastest bomber variant of the aircraft possible.

The Secret Airforce

The rearmament of the German air forces began as a covert program, with the government  hiding its efforts in both accumulating a pool of experienced airmen, and producing capable combat airplanes. The foundations of a new air force were laid during the Weimar period, where all of the existing civil airlines were merged into the state owned Deutsche Lufthansa enterprise under the directorship of Erhard Milch. Milch was a former Junkers employee, and future Inspector General of the Luftwaffe during the Second World War. In running Lufthansa, he created a pool of experienced pilots, aircrew, and maintainers under a single state enterprise, one which could provide the necessary expertise for providing the human resources necessary for any new military organization.

The task of arming this air force had to be achieved more covertly, and was pursued through two means. The first was simply to continue the production of civilian aircraft in order to maintain technical competence and an industrial base for building aircraft, and secondly, to design military equipment in secret abroad. The largest of these efforts was in the Soviet Union where several firms, the first being Junkers, built facilities supplied with shadow funding from the Weimar government. The Junkers plant at Fili, near Moscow, would sell military aircraft to the nascent USSR while gaining invaluable design and production expertise for facilities back in Germany.

Designed ostensibly as an airliner, the He 111 was the primary medium bomber of the Luftwaffe during the early stages of WWII. (wikimedia)

In the years to follow, German aircraft firms would go on to produce a number of dual-use civilian aircraft. Even before the rise of the Nazi party in Germany, this secret rearmament program was producing designs like the Junkers K-37 high speed mail plane, which was developed into a bomber in Japan as the Mitsubishi K-1 and 2. The designs of new military aircraft accelerated under the Nazi regime, who unlike their predecessors, were not simply interested in keeping pace in military aviation, but were now looking for weapons to defeat the United Kingdom, France, and the Soviet Union.

The new Luftwaffe was to have a very strong striking arm, and thus needed a bomber fleet. To meet this need, the government requested designs for high speed airliners and mail delivery aircraft that could double as light and medium bombers. By the end of 1935, this contest produced the Heinkel He 111, the Dornier Do 17, and the Junkers Ju 86. They were all capable, and very modern for their day, but with the expectation of conflict by around 1940 it was clear a second generation of aircraft would be needed to phase out these models once they began to show their age. The resources for this effort were in a competition between a large, four engine Uralbomber to strike at targets deep within the Soviet Union, and a smaller twin-engined Schnellbomber, a shorter ranged, more flexible medium bomber. The death of the Uralbomber’s strongest supporter, General Wever, and the more practical concerns of being able to support a fleet of heavy bombers, ensured the Schnellbomber’s ascendancy. Beyond this, the range of medium bombers was judged sufficient for war against France and Britain, who were seen as the primary opponents to the regime in the short term, and thus Germany would have the time to develop a heavy bomber later on for war against the Soviet Union.

This Schnellbomber was to be a fast medium bomber capable of engaging distant targets without need for an escort or heavy defensive armament. The requirements were listed as needing a top speed of 500 km/h, a 1000 kg bomb load, a range of 2500 km, and of course it needed to have a modest production impact, taking no more than 30,000 man hours to build. Junkers, and Willi Messerschmitt at the Bayerisch Flugzeugwerke, were the only major competitors, and though Messerschmitt’s Bf 162 was the simpler of the two, the design was not altogether finished at the time of its submission, and thus the Junkers Ju 88 was the clear front runner.

The Ju 88 went through lengthy prototyping, this being the fifth, and far from the last. (prints online)

The Junkers Ju 88 was a modern, but not revolutionary design, it represented the most up to date concepts in airplane design, did but not incorporate any cutting edge technology. It was originally developed as a high speed level-bomber, but after the death of General Weaver, Ernst Udet was made the general Flugzeugmeister, the general inspector for the Luftwaffe. This change would result in severe complications to its, and other aircraft’s, development. A fervent advocate of the newly refined techniques of dive bombing, he made it a requirement that new bombers be made able to perform these attacks, which would require a substantial number of modifications to the design. Udet was a famed Great War aviator, but had very little in the way of engineering knowledge, and this decision slowed the development of the Ju 88, and largely doomed the later heavy bomber projects.

This requirement saw the program shift from the aircraft being a Schnellbomber to the multipurpose ‘Wunderbomber’, which required significant structural strengthening and the installation of dive breaks with an automatic recovery system. This added drag, weight, and delays in prototyping, but in the end, the design changes were worked into the aircraft satisfactorily. Production however was not forthcoming, as the German aviation industry would struggle to shift a massive proportion of capacity to building the new plane at an overly optimistic, and unreachable, rate of 300 per month. The plans for the plane were delivered in 1934, and the first prototype flew in 1936, but serial production only began in 1939. It wasn’t until 1940 that the Ju 88A-1 medium bomber was being produced at about ⅔’s of the desired 300 planes per month. It was the massive number of design changes resulting from the typical industrial corrections, the mission changes from the Luftwaffe, and simply basic design tweaks, that caused delay after delay.

Teething issues notwithstanding, the Luftwaffe had its most advanced bomber in the form of the Ju 88A. While it wasn’t the supposedly untouchable high speed bomber it was originally supposed to be, it was a multipurpose aircraft capable of carrying out a much wider number of missions. While it was slower than the original concept, it traded that speed for being able to engage large, mobile targets such as trains, columns of vehicles on roads, ships, and static point targets too small to be hit with level bombing.

The Early Years

Following its slow production during 1939, the Ju 88A was not employed widely until 1940, during the invasion of Norway. Its pilots were immediately appreciative of the plane’s superior handling and speed over the older bombers in service, and its dive attack capabilities were soon put to use. Equipped with the new aircraft, elements of Kampfgeschwader 30 engaged a number of Allied ships during Operation Weserubung, badly damaging the cruiser HMS Suffolk, the French cruiser Emile, and sinking the destroyer HMS Gurkha.

While it was the fastest Luftwaffe bomber by a large margin, its crews were quick to learn that no matter its top speed, a bomber was always in danger without escorts. (albumwar)

It was during the invasion of Belgium and France that some of the design’s shortcomings became apparent, chief of which was its poor defensive armament and the limited fields of fire from the forward and top-rear machine gun positions. Not yet employed in significant numbers, the Ju 88 units on this front participated mostly in attacks against the French air force in suppressing their bases and attacking aircraft production. Beyond this they attacked port facilities and shipping to complicate the transportation of forces between Britain and the continent.

The attacks on the UK, culminating in the weeks that have come to be known as the Battle of Britain, would further demonstrate the destructive capabilities of the Ju 88, but also its vulnerability to fighters. In the end, bomber losses were high among all Luftwaffe units involved, with Ju 88 units specifically having trouble maintaining serviceability rates with their new aircraft. In short, both the RAF and Luftwaffe were pulverized and great damage was rained across much of Southern England, but in the end the defenders prevailed, and the Luftwaffe was forced to retreat and regroup.

As the campaign against England progressed, the Ju 88A was entering wider service and gradually replacing the obsolete Do 17. (rods warbirds)

Returning that fall, the Luftwaffe began the Blitz, nightly attacks against British cities conducted in the hope of breaking the resolve of the civilian populace. For the Germans, these raids would be less costly, but unlike earlier attacks on British production and shipping, there was little they could point to as a success beyond the acreage of burned out homes. The performance of the Ju 88 over the He 111 and Do 17 on these missions was largely a non-issue given the inaccuracy of nightly air defenses, and the small, but growing, RAF night fighter force. The true battle was being fought over the airwaves with the Luftwaffe using radio navigation aids to guide bombers to their targets, and the British sending out their own signals to disrupt them.

Adaptation

As with all military aircraft, design improvements were constantly being worked in via small changes, or different design variants. While there are few aircraft with as many variant designs as the Ju 88, these started simple. Initially there was a basic heavy fighter conversion of the Ju 88A-1, the Ju 88C-1 and 2. The glass ‘beetle’s eye’ nose glaze was replaced with a metal nose with fittings for 7.92mm machine guns, and 15 mm and 20 mm autocannons. These were built by modifying completed bombers, and in the earliest models, these fighters still had bombing gear and dive brakes. Beyond these easy converts, it was clear the basic bomber design itself could be significantly improved. The first major revision was in installing a set of long span wings and replacing the 1200hp Junker Jumo 111B’s for newer, more powerful models. While the more powerful Jumo 111J would not be produced in the numbers needed until 1941, implementing a new, longer span wing proved easy enough thanks to the modular construction of the aircraft. The revised design was the Ju 88A-5, which would go on to see service during the Blitz and the campaigns to follow.

The Ju 88A-4 offered a thorough improvement in performance, and a better defensive armament. (bundesarchiv)

The first thorough improvement to the design was the Ju 88A-4, which incorporated the long span wings, a redesigned rear canopy equipped with a second gun to improve firing arcs, better radio equipment, and the new Jumo 211J engines which each produced 200 PS more than the older Jumo 211B. This new design would prove to be the foundation for many more variants of the aircraft, all made to pursue different missions.

By the end of the Blitz, the Luftwaffe was having to contend with the nightly bombing of Germany by the RAF’s Bomber Command, and the Mediterranean theater, which featured action at very long ranges against maritime and ground targets alike. To suit these disparate needs, several new variant designs of the Ju 88A-4 were created. Mass produced heavy fighters were built to service long range day and night fighter squadrons, torpedo computers and shackles were added for anti-shipping units, and streamlined recon planes were built. Once the Jumo 211J was available in large numbers in 1942, Ju 88A-4 production would surge after pre-built airframes were finally receiving their new engines, and thus the number of Ju 88’s variants was expanded upon as well.

Mid War Service

By the end of 1942, the war had grown to four major fronts and the Ju 88 was used extensively on all of them. Over the Bay of Biscay Ju 88C-6 long range fighters flew cover for U-Boats, over Western Europe they served as night fighters, and across the Mediterranean and Eastern Fronts there were a great number of bomber, torpedo bomber, and photo reconnaissance units. However, near the end of 1942, the Ju 88A-4 derived models were starting to grow more vulnerable as the Luftwaffe’s fighter forces saw continued attrition. The Allied fighter forces were also growing considerably in strength, especially those of the UK and US who were building a considerable technological edge over their German opponents. With the Ju 288 having failed to materialize, Junkers would have to return to the drawing board with their old design.

This later Ju 88T recon aircraft features a number of aerodynamic improvements over the older models. With the aircraft’s lower ‘gondola’ section having been removed and having had the older ‘beetle’s eye’ nose replaced for a low drag glazing. This nose glazing first appeared on reconnaissance Ju 88s near the end of 1942.(asisbiz)

With the wings already having been modified, further performance improvements were to come through streamlining and new engines. In 1942, a proposed major redesign of the aircraft with a new, streamlined canopy was proposed and prototyped, but it was clear that the production delays in adopting this new Ju 88B would be unacceptable. The new design would be included in the later Ju 188, but no major fuselage changes would be made on the Ju 88 for the rest of the war. Instead, a streamlined nose glazing would be considered, as would a new rear streamlined canopy with a defensive 13mm Mg 131 gun mount.

The only new major change in equipment was the introduction of the BMW 801 engine, which was now available in greater numbers, no longer reserved for Fw 190 fighter production. The Jumo 111J, even in its improved form, was growing increasingly obsolete as it had reached its operational limits. A successor design, the Jumo 213 with an improved pressurized cooling system, and designed to operate at much higher RPMs, was in development, but Germany’s reliance on second rate ‘economy alloys’, and resources being spread thin across several competing engine designs had caused long, painful delays. Once Germany’s access to molybdenum, tungsten, cobalt, and nickel were restricted by the Allied blockade, engine development ran into significant barriers. Thus, modified versions of older designs presented some of the few ways forward.

The BMW 801 promised a power increase of over 300 PS per engine, and beyond that it featured a highly advanced engine control system that meant the pilot only needed to adjust the throttle, and the system would adjust the RPM, boost, and mixture as needed. It’s only major drawback was its relatively dated single stage supercharger. Regardless, it represented the way forward for the Ju 88, and several new designs were drafted using this engine. The first of these were heavy fighters, which were much improved thanks to this massive increase in horsepower. The Ju 88R series would be the first mass produced variants to use this engine, but it still used an otherwise unmodified bomber airframe. There was much to be improved in regards to aerodynamics, especially in the case of the lower underslung ‘gondola’ which carried a pair of autocannons and a position for a ventral gunner on the Ju 88R. Further developments would see the removal of this feature, and net a massive reduction in drag, which would lead to the development of the final series of production Ju 88s.

The Ju 88S was delivered in a factory standard green/off white pattern, once they reached squadrons they were immediately repainted for night use. (hugojunkers)

These new models would be the Ju 88G, a night fighter, the Ju 88T, a reconnaissance aircraft, and the Ju 88S, a high speed level bomber and pathfinding aircraft. Apart from a few pieces of specialized equipment, and the larger vertical stabilizer on the Ju 88G, these aircraft shared the same supply chain, and the technical differences between them were so minor that they shared basic manuals. This would prove vital, as during this period, Inspector General Erhard Milch was attempting to rationalize all aircraft production into as few airframes as possible in order to increase overall production, and to ease the requirements of servicing aircraft. As part of this scheme, the Ju 88 would prove essential, with its single airframe fulfilling many of the most essential roles in the Luftwaffe.

The new Ju 88S, would resemble the recon plane almost entirely save for its lack of camera mounts. It was fitted with the low drag nose cone first installed aboard the earlier recon models, BMW 801D engines, and the dive brakes were removed. Compared to the Ju 88A-4, the top speed in a clean configuration was increased from 470 km/h to 588 km/h, at 6 km. At its maximum cruise speed of 460km/h, the plane nearly reached the maximum speed of the previous model. Performance could be improved further at high altitudes using the GM-1 nitrous boost system. The system was simple, it used the nitrous as an oxygen carrier to increase the oxygen content of the air entering the manifold at altitudes where the supercharger’s effectiveness fell off, and recovered engine performance otherwise lost to the thinner air. Using this system saw these planes reach a top speed of 610 km/h at 8km. Of course, carrying an external bomb load would seriously affect these speeds, but this boost in performance was remarkable. While the Ju 88S had sacrificed its dive bombing capability, it more than made up for it in sheer speed, which put it in the same league as the otherwise incomparable DeHavilland Mosquito Bomber.

The first of these planes was the prototype Ju 88V-56, which was followed by 24 production aircraft delivered up until June of 1943. These were not new airframes, however, but rebuilt Ju 88A-4’s, converted at Junkers Flugzeugwerk Magdeburg. Few major changes to this design were made until later, though the engines were soon changed to BMW 801G-2s, which was geared specifically for use in bombers.

Schnellbomber Once More

The first unit to receive these aircraft was Gruppe I of Kampfgeschwader 66, this being a specialized pathfinding unit whose task was to lead bombers to their targets at night. They received the first of the aircraft of May of 1943, and were employed in small raids and reconnaissance operations over Southern England from their base in Chartres, France. One of the first losses came on the 30th, when one plane was shot down by a Mosquito night fighter, who pursued and intercepted them at 30,000ft. The crew bailed out, and the plane went down over England, its wreckage carefully picked over once the empty canisters of the GM-1 system were identified.

High contrast blue-gray and black patterns were preferred for night use as the upper sections would not stand out against clouds, and the countershading obscured the plane against the night sky. (rods warbirds)

The unit trained for raids conducted with conventional beam navigation systems, but also the newer EGON method. This system operated using one or more Freya radars which tracked the path of an aircraft by its Identify Friend-or-Foe transponder signal and guided it along its course toward the target via radio transmission. Such a system would require a well trained crew as the Freya’s lack of a height finding capability meant that careful attention would be needed to maintain the plane’s altitude while receiving directions from the ground controller. This system would be less vulnerable to jamming than the radio beam direction types that the British were already familiar with, but it still relied on the typical Luftwaffe communications systems, which they were also familiar with.

It wasn’t until 1944 that they were used for their intended purpose, during the revenge motivated Operation Steinbock, or ‘Baby Blitz’ as it came to be known. The previous year had seen an intensification of the Allied Bombing of Germany, especially with the highly destructive raids against the city of Hamburg, and the disastrous Bomber Command offensive against Berlin in the Winter. In the span of those six grueling months, Bomber Command went from its highest capability for destruction, to its worst blunder of the war so far. Despite the apparent futility of the assault on their own capital, Hitler wished to exact a cost on the British people, and Reichsmarshal Goering felt it was an opportunity to show the lethality of his air force. The Luftwaffe had seen some improvements, and the addition of the massive, if troubled He 177 heavy bombers, gave the force a destructive new weapon. In contrast to the highest echelons of leadership, Colonel Dietrich Peltz, who was to direct the operation, wished to use this concentration of bombers against Allied shipping, which he believed could damage their oceanic supply lines before an anticipated cross-channel invasion. He failed to convince either of his superiors, and thus proceeded with Operation Steinbock.

KG 66 was effectively the leading edge of the force which peaked at 524 planes, supplying a total 42 bombers, 23 being Ju 88S-1s. The general level of night flying proficiency among the raiders was poor, and thus the pathfinders were essential in leading the raiding force to their targets. The attack was to mirror the tactics of RAF’s Bomber Command, with light, specialized pathfinders plotting a route for heavy bombers carrying the heaviest types of bombs available, intermixed with smaller incendiaries, and fragmentation bombs on timers set to explode well after the raid ended. The assault began on the night of January 21/22, and it immediately became apparent that all of the existing guidance systems in use were compromised, even EGON to an extent. In spite of this, EGON was the primary system in use on these raids, and was capable of high accuracy on nights without interference. Early in the campaign, on a night of poor visibility, the pathfinders failed to illuminate London, and only some 30 of 500 tons of bombs fell on the city that night. The RAF and the city’s Flak batteries would claim 20 planes, with 15 being lost to accidents.

As fast as the Ju 88S was, it was vulnerable to interception by the newest models of DeHavilland Mosquito nightfighters, which represented the deadliest nightfighters in use over Europe. (asisbiz)

However, the Luftwaffe was committed to the offensive, and launched another attack at the end of the month, and they returned to the city 7 more times in February, when the pathfinders had shown serious improvement. In March, they shifted their attention somewhat to Hull, and Bristol, but London remained their primary target, attacked five more times in March before the last major raid on the city in mid April. The Germans had little to show for their attacks, as while they had done a great deal of damage to the city, the worst since the Blitz, they found the Londoners as immovable as they had been near the start of the war. For their efforts, the Luftwaffe had largely expended their bomber forces, with Luftflotte 3’s Fliegerkorps IX now being left with 130 serviceable bombers. Reserves were drawn upon for replacements, and forces were redeployed from the Mediterranean, but there was nothing that could hope to challenge the 7000 planes of the Allied Air Forces across the channel. What might have been a potent strike force against the invasion was blunted in a shortsighted disaster that not only failed to take into account the lessons from Blitz, but what they themselves faced from Allies only weeks ago.

The Last Effort

I./KG 66 did not escape Steinbock untouched, losing about half of their aircraft, with only their Ju 88S and Ju 188 bombers remaining. However, as a specialized unit, and one of the only users of the Ju 88S, they were soon supplied with fresh aircraft and set to a new mission. Steinbock had largely destroyed the Luftwaffe’s bomber forces, and thus there was little use for a pathfinder force tasked with directing large formations of bombers. The Luftwaffe’s fortunes had also declined since the futile offensive, as the American 8th and 15th air forces were employing long range escorts which now contested the airspace over all of Western Europe. When the Allies returned to France, they did so under the protective canopy of their fighter forces. To strike at the American and British armies now deployed to France, one of the few options available was to attack at night. With the bomber force having been depleted, it would thus fall to what remained, with assistance from night fighter squadrons, to carry out attacks against the Allied beachhead, supply lines, and frontline positions.

In this, I./KG 66 was perhaps the best equipped squadron for the task, having superior navigational training, and better aircraft than the typical raiders. Their operations were infrequent through the Autumn of 1944, while they rebased several times to keep ahead of the advancing Allied armies. Beyond this, there was a lull in night operations across the Western Front from roughly September to December. Their situation had deteriorated significantly, with chronic fuel shortages now being universal, and the Western Allies having succeeded in blinding German early warning systems by deploying ground based jammers to the continent.

A Ju 88S-1 in service with I. KG 66. (Cujo1970)

It was during the last month of 1944 that Germany’s remaining resources in the west were to be placed on an all-or-nothing offensive to stall the advance of the Allied armies. Operation Wacht Am Rhein would involve throwing what remained of the Heer’s offensive capabilities at the Allies at a moment where they had outpaced their supply lines. One of the major factors for the operation was the need for poor weather, to eliminate the Allied advantage in the air. For both sides of the coming battle, the only air units that could take part were those capable of instrument flying. For the Germans, this eliminated the use of all but the scarce remaining bombers, and their night fighters, which had become a second line night attack force since the Normandy landings. Against them were handful of American P-61 night fighters, with most of the RAF’s Mosquito squadrons having been transferred to the UK to refit to the new Mk XXX.

KG 66 was to take a vital and early lead in the air operations during the offensive, where it would again act as a pathfinder force. They now also operated the Ju 88S-3 from their base in Dedelsdorf, Germany, this being a new subtype that used the more reliable Jumo 213A engines. Operations began on the night of December 17/18, with the Luftwaffe mounting some 243 night attack sorties. KG 66’s role was to aid in the navigation of night fighters, and to illuminate targets along the roads between Sittard, Maastricht, and Liege. Given the Allied supply situation, and the chaotic road traffic experienced across the front, these strafing and cluster bomb attacks would inflict considerable losses and sow confusion along the roads. Losses among the night fighters themselves were steep, as despite the minor presence of allied night fighters, the use of proximity, radar-fused shells among Allied flak units proved lethal.

The night attack force would fly out the next night, with only limited success, but no losses. These attacks would continue throughout the offensive against rear line supply convoys, trains, and troop concentrations. They had some notable success, but at a very high cost to the night fighter force at a time when experienced aircrews could not be replaced. KG 66 would fare somewhat better given their less direct role in the assault, and would have an active strength of 29 Ju 88S-3s by January 10th, 1945. By this time, the S-3 was also found in the inventories of a number of standard bomber units. Outside of KG 66, the largest numbers of the aircraft were found in the first and second Gruppe of LG 1, a training unit now serving in combat, having been issued the aircraft the previous July.

As many Luftwaffe airfields were under threat from allied fighters through 1944, a reliance on secondary, concealed airfields was inevitable. (asisbiz)

For the next few weeks, what remained of the German bomber and night fighter forces of the Western front would be used as night harassment forces. Morale plummeted as there was little hope of anything being achieved in these costly actions, and the best of the RAF’s night fighter forces were again on the continent. During these night raids, crews felt a constant anxiety over the presence of the dreaded Mosquito, which possessed both incredible speed and an endurance that allowed it to pursue targets on long chases. When these planes were found to be operating in a certain region, night attack sorties for the night were called off. Such notices came at a great relief to the dwindling number of bomber and night fighter crews who were called upon to support the army as it retreated ever deeper into Germany itself. In the final weeks of the war, KG 66 was merged with KG 200 and participated in night harassment sorties until the capitulation of the German armed forces.

Handling and Use Characteristics

The Ju 88S retained the good flying characteristics the series was known for. It featured well harmonized, responsive controls that remained light at higher speeds, and possessed excellent take off and landing characteristics. The use of the highly automated BMW 801 and Jumo 213 engines also removed a substantial amount of workload for the pilot, who only needed to adjust the throttle to bring the aircraft to its various power settings. Combined with the level, azimuth only autopilot, the Ju 88 was an aircraft many Luftwaffe crews felt confident in flying hands off for extended periods of time. This would prove essential considering the mostly nocturnal use of the plane, where pilots flew by instruments and needed to pay close attention to the various navigational signals guiding them to their targets. Overall, the Ju 88 has been described as a viceless aircraft with very forgiving handling.

It would also prove to be incredibly fast, with a clean configuration allowing the Ju 88S-1 to reach 588 km/h at 6 km. Using various boost systems allowed the aircraft to reach higher speeds. GM-1 nitrous boosting allowed the S-1 to reach 610 km/h at 8 km, with the S-3 being able to reach 615 km/h. At lower altitudes, the S-3 could make use of methanol-water injection to allow the engine to produce considerably more power. While no data is extant on performance of the aircraft with this system, crew testimonies claim the heavier Ju 88G-6 night fighters were capable of exceeding 600 km/h at lower altitudes using MW50.

The Ju 88 gained a reputation for being easy to fly, both among Luftwaffe aircrews and foreign evaluators. (asisbiz)

Famed Royal Navy pilot Capt. Erik ‘Winkle’ Brown would also be among the few allied pilots to have had the opportunity to fly many models of the Ju 88, from bombers to night fighters. Capt. Brown felt the aircraft possessed largely the same excellent handling characteristics from the Ju 88A-5 medium bomber to the Ju 88G-6 nightfighter. He praised it for its easy ground handling, thanks to its excellent brakes, it’s good handling during climbs, and light controls at cruising speed.

Capt. Brown would spend more time with the G-6, a variant very similar in construction to the Ju 88S-3, and was able to put one through more demanding tests. Having previously flown several versions of the Ju 88, Brown was particularly impressed by the high speeds he reached in a Ju 88G-6 (Werk-nr 621965). The aircraft remained in line with his general, glowing remarks over the Ju 88. “It was a pilot’s airplane, first and last, it demanded a reasonable degree of skill in handling and it responded splendidly when such skill was applied. There was a number of very good German aircraft but, with the exception of the Fw 190, none aroused my profound admiration as did the Junkers ‘eighty-eight’.”

Perhaps the simplest, but greatest, advantage the aircraft had was in the close proximity of the crewmembers, which allowed them easy communication in the event of intercom failure or emergency. It also allowed the pilot to be seated beside the gunner and flight engineer, an ideal arrangement providing both easy communication and good situational awareness. This arrangement also provided good protection from rearward attacks, with the armored gunner’s position and the bulkhead armor between the crew and any attacker. Should all else fail, the bail out procedure was as simple as it could have been. The entire rear of the canopy detached, allowing for all of the crew to bail out from the shared compartment.

The general design of the aircraft was modular, with the wings, stabilizers, and engine units being attached to the aircraft by very robust, but easily removable connectors. Thus, the maintenance, replacement, or adjustment of any one of these components was made far easier. This lent to an overall ease of maintainability for the ground crews who could perform dreaded tasks like engine replacements rapidly, and without much exertion. The unified engine units could simply be disconnected and pulled away from the mount.

While it inherited the benefits of the original design, it also had its flaws. The most obvious of which was the poor visibility due to the bars of the reinforced cockpit frame, which reduced visibility, and the troublesome landing gear which had a tendency to buckle if the aircraft was brought down too hard. The landing gear was a hydraulically actuated set that rotated 90 degrees so that the wheels would lie flat within their nacelles. This greatly reduced drag, as the shallower landing gear bays contributed far less to the frontal area of the plane, but they could be broken in hard landings or harsh ground maneuvers while carrying a heavy payload. These types of accidents were typically handled by the local repair staff, but greater levels of damage often called for an aircraft to be disassembled and sent to repair depots, or factories, for restoration.

The most common accidents with the plane were landing accidents involving flipping the plane over onto its nose. Due to the forward placement of the engines, it wasn’t uncommon for the plane to flip over forward while landing, when less experienced pilots were too heavy on the brakes. These typically resulted in little more than damaged propellers and smashed nose cones, and thus didn’t remove an aircraft from service for very long. In more dramatic cases the plane could be flipped onto its back and injuring the crew.

Production

As one of the more minor variants of the Ju 88, the S was manufactured across several facilities, with both new built, and modified production models. The Ju 88S-1 was entirely an Umbau series, a modified production aircraft built from new Ju 88A-4 airframes. These were produced at the Junkers plant in Magdeburg, with the first deliveries arriving in the Spring. At Magdeburg, a total of 57 planes were manufactured in 1943, with 14 more being built the following year, with production being terminated in May.

The Ju 88S-3 incorporated the newer Junkers Jumo 213A engines, its performance was not significantly altered, but the engine was more reliable and in greater supply. It was the only variant to be mass produced as newly built, rather than modified, aircraft. (rods warbirds)

The Ju 88S-3 was built as both new airframes, and modified production aircraft. All of the new production aircraft were built at the Henschel Aircraft Factory in 1944, beginning in June. Here, they replaced the production of the Ju 88A-4, with a total of 264 rolling off the line in 1944, and 12 more the following year. The Henschel plant built another 15 from Ju 88A-4s. The Ju 88S-3 was by far the more prolific of the two and wasn’t just regarded as a specialized aircraft, with deliveries being made to standard bomber squadrons. Apart from these bombers, Deutsche Lufthansa at Berlin-Staaken converted 3 Ju 88S-3’s to high speed couriers and transports.

The production of the Ju 88S itself continued at a fairly high pace for a specialized design well into 1944, when bomber production was drastically cut in favor of fighters. There was also a declining interest in piston engine bombers, as the German aviation industry began to produce a growing number of jet aircraft. The Arado 234 was seen as an obvious successor, being the only reconnaissance plane that was truly non interceptable.

The build conditions of these aircraft declined precipitously between 1943 and 1944 as the German war effort ran short on key materials, and an ever growing number of factory workers were drafted. This hit a critical level in 1943, where the mass use of forced labor became the standard across most wartime German industries. In aviation, it had become an accepted practice the previous year, with concentration camp inmates being made to work at a number of plants. As the German labor pool continued to be drained, an even larger proportion of forced laborers were used, now drawing large numbers from the concentration camp system, and forcefully deported workers from Eastern Europe. This change saw a vast drop in working conditions and a large increase in sabotage; production quantities surged while quality backslid considerably. This process was overseen by Erhard Milch, inspector general for the air force, and armaments minister Albert Speer. They expanded upon the use of forced labor drastically in early 1944, following the American Air Forces targeting of German fighter production. This enabled them to build more aircraft than ever before, but saw a sharp increase in rates of sabotage and an overall decline in quality.

Much of this production strategy also relied on corner cutting and the implementation of extremely long work hours, with a 72 hour work week eventually becoming the standard. In terms of materials, they cut back the production of spare parts, began to accept well-used parts in new production aircraft, and recycled refurbished equipment from written-off planes. The production of all but a small, crucial number of fighter, night fighter, and reconnaissance models were cut drastically or eliminated. Overall, this strategy allowed them to drastically boost fighter production in the short term, but the rate could not be maintained and declined in the fall of 1944, only a few weeks after its peak.

Construction

Fuselage

The Ju 88A-4 was the most widely produced bomber variant and formed the basis of the Ju 88S’s design. This was also true in a literal sense, with many of the new models being built from existing A-4s. It was conventional all metal aircraft in its construction, and, while it pushed few technical boundaries, it was state of the art and versatile. It was primarily made of aluminum alloys, with cast parts used for load bearing elements. Some use of Elektron magnesium alloy was made to further reduce weight, but later in the war this had been replaced by steel, which was primarily used in the landing gear fittings. The fuselage cross section was rectangular with rounded corners and clad in large sheet aluminum stampings. It used a semi-monocoque structure made up of formers and bulkheads joined by connectors that ran front to aft, with the outer aluminum skin riveted to both elements, which allowed it to bear some of the structural load. Its structural load factor was 4.5 with a 1.1 multiplier for the first wrinkle, 1.3 for yield, and 1.8 for failure. In service, it proved very sturdy, with Junkers engineers claiming after the war that there had been no reported major structural failures over the service life of the airframe.

Modularity was a key feature of the Ju 88, allowing for simple modifications to the design, and ease of field maintenance.(Ju 88S flugzeug handbuch)

By the time of the Ju 88S, the construction process had been improved to the point where the fuselage was built from sub-assemblies that would become the upper and bottom halves of the fuselage. These would then be joined together after wiring and internal components were fitted. Wing construction followed a similar process, making heavy use of sub assemblies, followed by equipment installation, skinning, and painting.

Wings

The Ju 88’s wings were the heaviest part of the aircraft, comprising much of its total structural weight at over 1200 kg. A pair of massive main spars ran from the root to the wing tip, a rear spar ran across the entire span of the wing to support the flaps and aileron. One forward spar ran from the engine nacelles to the fuselage to transfer thrust from the engines and support loads from the landing gear. These spars were joined by relatively few airfoil shaped ribs and stiffened with corrugated aluminum. The wings were joined to the fuselage by means of four large ball-screw connectors, which made for easy assembly and alignment.

 

Wing connecting system (Ju 88A-4 Bedieungsvorscrift 1941)

The vertical stabilizer was fixed to the fuselage by means of the same ball-screw connectors as the wings. Installing it was simple, with the rudderless stabilizer being fitted to the fuselage, and the rudder fin being affixed afterwards. The horizontal stabilizers did not use the same fitting system. Instead, they were each inserted into the fuselage by two spars which were then bolted together.

As previously stated, the landing gear could prove troublesome due compromises in its design. During early prototyping, the landing gear was redesigned to use a single strut that would rotate so that it would lie flat beneath the wing when retracted. While this did remove frontal area that would have seriously impacted the aircraft’s high speed performance, it came at the cost of added complexity, and made for a far less robust landing gear arrangement. Differing from earlier series, the Ju 88S’s landing gear frames made use of welded cast steel instead of light weight alloys.

The wings were also equipped with an excellent de-icing system which took in air, ran it through a heat exchanger around the exhaust ejector stacks, drove it through channels in the wings, and then out over the ailerons. As the BMW 801 had no exhaust stacks compatible with this system, they made use of a petrol-fired heater to supply air to the de-icing system on the Ju 88S-1.

 

The highly effective de-icing system made Ju 88s a comparatively safe aircraft to fly under the worst winter conditions. (NACA)

 

Engines

In addition to its high power and automation, the BMW 801 was well protected, with armor plate ahead of the integral oil cooler. (smithsonian)

Apart from the initial use of BMW 801D’s, the Ju 88S used two engines in service, the BMW 801G-2 and the Junkers Jumo 213A-1. The BMW 801G-2 was a 14 cylinder, 41.8 liter radial engine which produced a maximum of 1715 PS at 2700 rpm. It had a bore and stroke of 156 mm by 156 mm, weighed 1210 kg, had a compression ratio of 7.22:1, and ran on C3 95 octane aviation gasoline. It was equipped with a single stage, two speed supercharger that gave the engine a full throttle height of 6 km. Despite its lackluster high altitude performance, the engine had a massive advantage in its high level of automation. Designed with an mechanical-hydraulic computer, called the Kommandogerät, the pilot needed only to adjust the throttle to bring the engines to a higher or lower power setting. RPM, mixture, and boost were all managed by this system, and massively reduced the pilot’s workload. The BMW 801G-2 would be installed aboard the Ju 88S-1 before later being replaced with the Jumo 213A-1 on the S-3.

The Jumo 213A was a 35 liter, inverted V-12 that was derived from the earlier Jumo 211. The new engine was designed to work at significantly higher RPMs and featured a new pressurized cooling system, which kept the internal pressure stable regardless of altitude. The engine ran on B4 gasoline, which was approximately 89 to 91 octane by the stage of the war this aircraft was used. The primary issue with the older Jumo 211 was its open cooling system which left it open to the effects of external air pressure. At higher altitudes, the lower boiling point of water severely its performance. The new engine possessed a smaller block, a more powerful supercharger, and an automated control device, like that on the BMW 801, called the Bediengerat. The A, being a low altitude model of the engine, had a single stage, two speed supercharger.  This gave the engine a full throttle height of around 6 km, roughly the same as the BMW 801. The engine had a bore and stroke of 150mm by 165mm, a weight of 940 kg, a compression ratio of 6.5:1, and it produced 1775 PS at 3250 RPM. A large annular radiator provided cooling for the engine’s pressurized cooling system, and oil.

The Jumo 213A was the preferred engine for Ju 88 crews, owing to its higher reliability. Note, this engine is displayed upside down. (aerofossile2012)

Both engines were installed in ‘Kraftei’ units which placed the engine and its associated cooling systems within a single, unified arrangement. These allowed for a great ease of maintenance, as the entire engine could be easily removed and replaced. These engines were fitted with VDM and VS-111 propellers on the BMW 801G and Jumo 213A respectively. Both engines employed direct fuel injection.

Fuel System

Fuel capacity varied dramatically depending on the mission loadout, as the rear fuselage tank would be removed in order to carry the GM-1 or MW 50 bottles. Fuel tankage consisted of multiple wing tanks contributing 1680 liters, a forward fuselage fuel tank of 1220 liters, a rear fuselage tank of 680 liters, and up to two external fuel tanks of 900 liters. At the lowest fuel capacity of 1680 liters, the Ju 88S-1 could fly a maximum of 1130 km at a cruise speed of 420 km/h, or 750 km at a maximum cruise speed of 460 km/h. At a maximum fuel capacity of 3580 liters, this was increased to 2415 km at low cruise, and 1590 km at high cruise.

The maximum fuel tankage of the Ju 88, 7 & 8 are oil, 9 is the emergency raft and beacon kit. (Ju 88A-4 Bedieungsvorscrift 1941)

Endurance with the Jumo 213A-1 powered Ju 88S-3 was somewhat lower, with a reduced fuel capacity of 1680 liters giving the aircraft a range of 1000 km at cruising speed of 410 km/h, and a range of 900 km at a maximum cruise speed of 450 km/h. The maximum operational fuel load was reduced to 2900 liters, which permitted a range of 2050 km at low cruise, and 1570 km at high.

Engine Boost Systems

The Ju 88S-1 could carry the GM1 high altitude boost system, and its successor, the S-3 could carry this system and the low altitude MW 50 low altitude boost system. The GM1 system was a nitrous boost system which provided high oxygen content to the engine at altitudes where the super charger failed to provide a boost with enough oxygen content to run the engine at its higher power settings. The mixture was delivered into the supercharger intake by means of compressed air. Activating the system was done by flipping the activation switch in the cockpit, which was accompanied by gauges showing the pressure remaining in the system. The activation time was approximately five minutes.

The high altitude boost systems allowed the Ju 88S to evade all but the fastest night fighters in Allied service. (candvt)

The chilled liquid nitrous was stored in insulated bottles, in either a three bottle arrangement, where each held approximately 90 liters, or a single large container containing approximately 284 liters. The flow of nitrous was either 3.26 kg per engine, per minute, or when set to the emergency setting, 5.98 kg per engine per minute. The emergency setting was typically ignored, as it was seen to cause engine trouble. In the three bottle version, the boost could be sustained for a non-consecutive 45 minutes, or 27 at the emergency setting. The chilled nitrous also aided in reducing knock via charge cooling. It should be understood that this system does not boost the maximum power output of the engine, but is rather a method of recovering power lost due to the thinner air at high altitudes. The activation height for the BMW 801 was 7 km, below which it offered no benefit.

MW 50 was a low altitude boost system to increase the maximum power output of the engine. This is done by reducing knock and allowing the engine to run at manifold pressures far higher than normal. This is achieved by increasing the overall octane rating of the fuel by adding methanol, rated at approximately 115, and water, which allows for a denser airflow at the manifold via charge cooling. This allowed the Jumo 213A to run at 2100 PS, roughly a 325 PS increase. Use of the system was rare on the Ju 88S.

It was not without its drawbacks. Firstly, the mixture was highly corrosive, and even with its anti-corrosion additive, it markedly shortened the lifespan of the engine. Second, was that it was restricted to use at lower altitudes. Unlike GM1 which delivered using pressurized air bottles, MW 50 was supplied into the supercharger via a pump. After rising above the supercharger’s maximum effective height, pressure in the system would fall until it offered no benefit to performance.

Crew Accommodations

The crew arrangement on all Ju 88 models would set the entire crew within the canopy and in close contact with one another. The bombardier sat to the pilot’s right, a flight engineer/gunner at the pilot’s back, and a ventral gunner sat beside the flight engineer or in a prone position inside the “gondola”, where his weapon was located. Aboard the Ju 88S, the ventral gunner’s position had been omitted with the removal of the gondola, however the positions of the other crew members remained largely unchanged. While these close quarters arrangements were somewhat claustrophobic, they ensured easy communication between the pilot and the rest of the crew at all times. It also made for a much simpler bail out procedure, as half the canopy would detach and allow for a quick escape for all aboard. In the Ju 88S, the crew entered the aircraft through a hatch below the cockpit.

Armament

The aircraft came equipped with a pair of ETC 500 underwing racks which could support a payload of up to 1800kg per shackle. These two pylon positions were plumbed to allow them to mount a pair of 900 liter external fuel tanks. It was possible to mount a second pair of ETC 500 racks could be added beside the standard two, though this does not seem to have been carried out in the field. The Ju 88S retained the internal bomb stowage, and could be used to carry small diameter bombs or extra fuel. Apart from flares and small incendiaries that could be accommodated by this bomb bay, most of the weapons used were larger diameter bombs mounted to the external shackles, being either conventional high explosive or anti-personnel cluster bombs.

The internal bay could only accommodate small diameter bombs, and was often used to carry either extra fuel, or GM 1 cannisters. (Ju 88A-4 Bedieungsvorscrift 1941)

The single 13 mm MG 131 was placed at the rear of the canopy within an armored glass mount and supplied with 500 rounds of armor piercing and high explosive shells in equal proportion.

Avionics

The Ju 88S was typically equipped with the following devices: FuB1 2 (Blind approach receiver), Fug 10P (radio set), FuG 25 (IFF), FuG 101 (Radio altimeter), and in rare cases the FuG 136 (pathfinder command receiver).

The FuB1 2 was a blind landing system that guided the aircraft onto a runway by way of two radio beacons placed at 300 m and 3000 m away from one end of the airstrip. It was a tunable device so that airfields could possess separate frequencies between 30 and 33.3 mHz. The aircraft itself carried the Eb1 2 beacon receiver, the Eb1 3F beam receiver, the FBG 2 remote tuner, the AFN 2 approach indicator, the U8 power supply unit, and either a mast or flush antenna.

The FuG 10 was designed to be easy to maintain with its universal frame and swappable modules. (pa0pzd)

FuG 10P was a radio developed by Telefunken and was coupled with the Pielgeräte 6 radio direction finder. The device consisted of numerous transmitters and receivers capable of operating at various ranges. Each component was fitted in a modular box which was connected to a wall rack to allow for the quick replacement of damaged components. One pair, E10 L and EZ 6, operated at between 150-1200kHz, and another, S10 K and E10 K, between 3-6mHz. Other components included the U10/S and U10/E power supply units, and the fixed antenna loading unit AAC 2. Numerous versions existed and made use of various other components.

FuG 25 “Erstling” was an IFF system manufactured by GEMA that would respond with coded impulses to the ground-based Wurzburg, Freya, and Gemse radar systems up to a range of 100 km. The receiver operated on a frequency of 125 mHz and the transmitter at 160 mHz. The entire unit was contained within the SE 25A unit, with the BG 25A control box in the radio operator’s station. This unit was used to facilitate the use of the EGON navigation system wherein a pair of Freya, or Wasserman, radar stations would ping the IFF. Finding its direction, gauging the signal strength, and triangulating its angle between the radar stations allowed the ground controllers to accurately set the position of the aircraft against a plotting table. Navigational commands were issued over wireless telegraph or a specialized device, the FuG 136 Nachtfee.

FuG 101 was a radio altimeter designed by Siemens/LGW with a maximum range of 150-170 m and operated on a frequency of 375 mHz at 1.5 kW. Accuracy was within 2 m and the entire system weighed 16 kg. It consisted of the S 101A transmitter, E 101A receiver, U 101 power supply unit, and the pilot’s panel indicator.

FuG 136 Nachtfee

On the right is the read out for the aircraft based receiver, the notch at twelve o’clock would represent one of over a dozen commands. Note the display is from the ground unit. (candvt)

This communication device consisted of a CRT indicator aboard the plane which received commands from a ground based control console, using the EGON navigation system. These commands were represented by a 12 position, clock-like display, where each position represented a different navigational command. These were sent to an aircraft’s onboard FuG 25 IFF system via transmission pulses from the ground based radar. In addition to the 12 commands, based on the position of the pulse, an additional 4 commands could be given with a double pulse. For example, a transmission of position 1 followed by position 2 would be an entirely different command than simply just one on position 1. The device required constant monitoring by a specialized crew member.

 

Conclusion

Out to pasture. (wiki)

The Ju 88S would prove a tremendous improvement to Junker’s ever versatile bomber, achieving extremely high speeds and proving a difficult target to intercept. In terms of its sheer performance, Junkers was successful both in keeping their bomber from falling obsolescence, developing an airframe which was very successful both as a medium bomber and night fighter. However, nothing could prevent the eventual undoing of the Luftwaffe, from both the British and American Air Forces, and the terrible, short sighted decision making that dominated the upper echelons of power in the Third Reich.

Variants

Ju 88S-1: Bomber-Pathfinder equipped with BMW 801G-2 engines. 71 Built.

Ju 88S-2: Bomber-Pathfinder equipped with BMW 801T turbocharged engines. Experimental, none built.

Ju 88S-3:Bomber-Pathfinder equipped with Junkers Jumo 213A-1 engines. 291 Built.

Ju 88S-3 Highspeed Courier: Deutsche Lufthansa fast transport and mail carrier. 3 converted.

Ju 88S-4: Bomber-Pathfinder equipped with Junkers Jumo 213A-1 engines and vertical stabilizer from Ju 188. None built.

Specifications

Ju 88S-1 (Ju 88S-3) Specification
Engine BMW 801 G-2 (Jumo 213 A-1)
Engine Output 2×1715 PS (2x 1775 PS [MW50: 2100PS])
Empty Weight 8350 kg (8420 kg)
Loaded Weight 13650 kg (14040 kg)
Maximum Range (no weapons, max fuel) 2415 km (2050 km)
Maximum Endurance 5hr 45min (5hr 20min)
Maximum Speed [at altitude] 588 km/h at 60 km (580 km/h)
Maximum Speed with w/ GM1 at 8km 610 km/h at 6km (615 km/h at ~5.5 km)
Armament 1xMG 131
Crew 1 Pilot, 1 Radar Operator, 1 Flight Engineer/Gunner
Dimensions
Length 14.36 m
Wingspan 20.08 m
Wing Area 54.5 m2

Combat range varied dramatically depending on the fuel, weapon, and boost system arrangement. A Ju 88S-1 carrying pair of 250 kg bombs, and equipped with GM-1, had a combat radius of 330km. Without GM 1, its combat range was otherwise comparable to the Ju 88A-4.

Illustration

 

This polka-dot pattern was used by the pathfinder unit KG 66 from the spring of 1943 until the end of the war.
This paint scheme was used by LG 1 during the last offensive on the Western Front and the following retreat into Germany.

Credits

Written and Edited by Henry H.

Illustration by Arte Bellico

Sources

Primary:

A.D.I. (K) Report No. 357/1945. Radio and Radar Equipment in the Luftwaffe II. 1945.

Ju 88S-1 Flugzeug Handbuch. Junkers Flugzeug und Motorenwerke A.G., Dessau. 1944.

Ju 88S-1 Flugzeug Handbuch Teil 12 G Rüstsätze (Stand Marz 1944). Der Reichsminister der Luftfahrt und Oberbefehlshaber der Luftwaffe, Berlin. 1944.

Ju 88S-1 Flugzeug Handbuch Teil 12 D Sondereinbauten Heft 4: Sonderstoffanlage (Stand Marz 1944). Der Reichsminister der Luftfahrt und Oberbefehlshaber der Luftwaffe, Berlin. 1944.

Ju 88A-4 Bedienungsvorschrift-FL Bedienung und Wartung des Flugzeuges. Der Reichsminister der Luftfahrt und Oberbefehlshaber der Luftwaffe, Berlin. Juli 19, 1941.

Ju 88G-1 Schusswaffenlage Bedienungsvorschrift-Wa (Stand Oktober 1943). Der Reichsminister der Luftfahrt und Oberbefehlshaber der Luftwaffe, Berlin. November 1943.

Ju 88 G-1,R-2, S-1,T-1 Bedienungsvorschrift-Fl (Stand November 1943). Der Reichsminister der Luftfahrt und Oberbefehlshaber der Luftwaffe, Berlin. December 1, 1943.

Ju 88 G-2, G-6, S-3, T-3 Bedienungsvorschrift-Fl (Stand September 1944). 1944.

Rodert, L. A., & Jackson, R. (1942). A DESCRIPTION OF THE Ju 88 AIRPLANE ANTI-ICING EQUIPMENT (Tech.). Moffett Field, CA: NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS. 1942.

Secondary:

Brown, Eric Melrose. Wings of the Luftwaffe. Hikoki, 2010.

Medcalf, William A. Junkers Ju 88 Volume One From Schnellbomber to Multi-Mission War Plane. Manchester, UK: Chevron Publishing Limited , 2013.

Medcalf, William A. Junkers Ju 88 Volume Two The Bomber at War Day and Night Operational and service history. Manchester, UK: Chevron Publishing Limited , 2014.

Green, William. The warplanes of the Third Reich (1st ed.). London: Doubleday. 1972.

Bergs, Christopher & Kast, Bernhard. STUKA The Doctrine of the German Dive-Bomber. Lulu Press. 2022.

Boitens, Theo. Nachtjagd Combat Archive 24 July – 15 October 1944 Part 4. Red Kite . 2021.

Boitens, Theo. Nachtjagd Combat Archive 16 October – 31 December Part 5 1944. Red Kite . 2021.

Boitens, Theo. Nachtjagd Combat Archive, 1 January – 3 May 1945. Red Kite . 2022.

Bauer, Arthur .O. Nachtfee-EGON. 2012. https://www.cdvandt.org/

Bauer, Arthur .O. Nachtfee. 2012. https://www.cdvandt.org/

Stipa-Caproni

italian flag Italy (1932)
Experimental Aircraft – One Prototype Built

In the history of aviation, there have been many projects that on paper promised outstanding flight capabilities, or offered other technical advantages. The time before the Second World War saw aviation advance at a breakneck pace, and is well known for such experiments. The so-called Stipa-Caproni was one such project, being an intriguing, and somewhat bizarre, experimental aircraft designed by Italian aeronautical engineer Luigi Stipa, and built by Caproni during the interwar period. It was characterized by its tubular fuselage, hence earning it the nickname Flying Barrel.

The unique design Stripa-Caproni experimental aircraft. Source: Wiki

History

In 1927 a young Italian aircraft engineer Luigi Stipa began working on an unusual tube-shaped aircraft. Like many other aviation enthusiasts, Stipa was very interested in how aircraft could achieve better performance through exploring unorthodox construction methods. Thanks to his studies in thermodynamics, he was aware of the so-called Venturi effect, named after Italian physicist Giovanni Battista Venturi. In essence, this effect describes the reduction of fluid pressure and increasing velocity when it’s moving through a cylinder of decreased diameter. In theory, using this principle, a special type of aircraft could be created that could achieve significantly higher speeds than the conventional models of the time. Stipa theorized that for this purpose, such an aircraft would have to have a tube-shaped fuselage with the engine being positioned near the front. After finding it theoretically possible, he moved forward to test if the Venturi effect could be implemented in his airplane concept. For this purpose, he began a series of different tests inside a wing tunnel, carried out at the Aerodynamic Laboratory in Rome, from 1928 to 1931. The main focus of this testing period was to find the adequate shape, and leading edges, of the tube-shaped fuselage. This also included finding the right position of the engine, its position inside that tube, and the ideal propeller rotation speed. Following a series of wind tunnel tests, Stipa concluded that it was possible to build a full-scale prototype by using a single tube-shaped fuselage.

Luigi Stipa in his younger years. Source: Wiki

At the end of his research, he concluded that such a project was viable and set the task of building a working prototype. To gain interest in his project, he wrote about his work in the Rivista Aeronautica journal in 1931, and even built a small working replica. The next logical step was to write to the Italian Minister of Aviation, in the hope of getting approval for the realization of his project. Luckily for Stipa, his work came to the attention of General Luigi Crocco, the Air Ministry’s director. Stipa’s work was well received and the project received a green light. To test the concept, a working prototype had to be constructed.  It is important to note, that both Stipa and the Italian Air Ministry were aware that this project was merely to test his theories, and would not entail any further development of the prototype. In addition, both were aware that Stipa’s proposed principle was only practical on larger aircraft types.

For this purpose, the prototype was to be powered by a small 120-hp engine. The reason behind this decision lay in the fact that this aircraft was primarily built for evaluation and academic purposes. The Italian Air Ministry was not quite willing to invest huge monetary resources in it, beyond those necessary for the construction of the working prototype.

To help build the test aircraft, the Caproni aircraft manufacturer from Milan Taliedo was chosen. It was designated as Stipa-Caproni (sometimes referred to as Caproni-Stipa) referring to its designer and constructor. The prototype was built quickly and was ready for testing in October 1932.

It is perhaps a little surprising that such an unusual design would receive the necessary support for its realization. However, the exploration of new and unorthodox ideas in aviation was very popular in pre-war Europe. During the 1930s, Italy led the way in this aspect, perhaps even more than other countries, testing many unorthodox designs. What’s more, the Italian Fascist regime even encouraged different and unusual projects like this one, although many of them did not produce any meaningful results.

The Stipa-Caproni prototype was used for testing during 1932 and 1933. Source: en.topwar.ru

Technical specification

The Stipa-Caproni was a two-seater, mixed-construction aircraft, designed to have the simplest and thus cheapest fuselage. Its fuselage consisted of a tube which internally consisted of two large wooden round-shaped rings at the nose, followed by a series of similar but smaller rings. All of them were then connected with horizontal ribs which in turn were covered in fabric. The outer wooden rings served as the foundation, on which the wing and the cockpit would be connected. The fuselage design was, in effect, a large tube shaped airfoil.

A close-up view of the Stipa-Caproni internal fuselage construction. The two larger wooden rings serve as a base to which wings and the cockpit would be attached. Source: www.thevintagenews.com

The wings were mounted centrally on each side of the fuselage. These had a simple wooden construction, and were covered in fabric. They were also connected to the fuselage through metal bracing wires, which as a consequence increased the aircraft’s drag.

To the rear, a fairly large tail assembly was placed. During the design work of this aircraft, Stipa intentionally placed the rear control surfaces as close to the slipstream as possible. He hoped that this arrangement would greatly improve the aircraft’s handling and maneuverability.

On top of the fuselage, an elevated two-seat cockpit was placed. These were top-open with a small windshield placed in front of each position. There were also a pair of small doors that opened on the left side to give access to the seats.

The 120-hp de Havilland Gypsy III engine was placed inside this fuselage. It was centrally positioned and suspended using several steel bars that held it strongly in place. This was necessary to do so, as a weaker mounting could potentially endanger the aircraft during flight. The engine propeller was the almost the same diameter as the tube-shaped fuselage.

Given its overall design, and the position of the propellers inside the fuselage, the landing wheels were small and quite close to the ground. It consisted of three fixed road wheels. Two larger on the front and one smaller on the rear. Initially, wheel fairings were used but at some point, and for unclear reasons, these were removed.

A front view of the unusual engine installation. The engine itself was held in place by several metal bars. Source: Wiki
It was provided with a small and fixed three-wheel landing gear. Source: en.topwar.ru

Testing and Final Fate

With this project approved, a prototype was constructed and air tested in October 1932 at the experimental field at Monte Celio near Rome. Despite its odd design, the prototype was able to take to the sky without any major problems. Furthermore, it made several successful flights around Taliedo and Guidnia. It was even presented to the Italian Air Force for future test flights. During this period the aircraft was jokingly nicknamed Flying Barrel or Aereo Botte (Eng. Wooden wine barrel aircraft) or Aereo Barile (Eng. Fuel-Barrel aircraft).

The weight of the aircraft during these flights was 800 kg (1,874 lb), while the calculated wing loading was 44,73 kg/m² (9,16 lb sq.ft.). The maximum speed achieved was 133 km/h (83 mph), and it needed 40 minutes to climb at a height of 3, 000 m. It needed an 800 m long airfield to be able to take to the sky.

The Stipa-Caproni during one of many test flights. Source: www.historynet.com

Despite Stipa’s hopes that the position and shape of the tail control surfaces would improve its mobility, several problems were noted by the test pilots. Firstly the elevator worked very well, which ironically proved to be a major problem. Even with a slight movement of the command control stick by the pilots, the aircraft could prove very sensitive to elevator inputs. On the other hand, the rudder controls were quite stiff,  as a consequence the pilot had to use considerable force in order to use it effectively.  Analyzing this problem showed that the rudder’s large surface area was to blame for its stiff control. But besides the two problems, the aircraft was reported to be easy to fly when being used in a gliding flight. These defects  were of a more or less technical nature, which were not necessarily irremediable through further development of the overall design.

The design of the rear tail assembly proved somewhat problematic. Specifically, the elevator control was overly sensitive while the rudder was quite the opposite. Source: en.topwar.ru

The final results of evaluation flights showed that the Stipa-Caproni does not have any particularly great advantages compared to other more standard aircraft designs.  In addition, Stipa-Caproni’s overall aircraft shape offered limited space within the fuselage for passengers or payload.

As Stipa predicted from the start, his principles would not offer any major advantage over a standard smaller-dimension aircraft. The real application of the Stipa-Caproni design was only feasible on larger aircraft. Stipa hoped that his further research would enable him to construct large aircraft powered by two to three tube-shaped engine mounts. Unfortunately for him, after a series of test flights during 1932 and 1933 the interest in his work died out. It was briefly used in various Italian aviation propaganda publications before being scrapped in 1939.

Despite being in general an unimpressive design, the French showed interest in it. Particularly the company ANF Lex Maureaux, which went so far as to acquire a license for the design in 1935. According to initial plans, a two-engine variant was to be built for testing and evaluation. The project did not go beyond basic work was later canceled.

Lastly, an interesting fact is that many people considered Stipa-Caproni to design some sort of proto-jet engine. Whether this was the case or not, Stipa felt his work was overlooked, and according to some sources, he remained bitter throughout his life until he died in the early 1990s.

Stipa hoped that with more resources he would be able to test his principle on a much larger scale, but ultimately nothing came of it. Source: L. Stipa, Stipa Monoplane with Venturi Fuselage

Replica

In 1996, aviation enthusiast Guido Zuccoli began working on a smaller replica of this aircraft.  However, the death of Zuccoli in a landing accident caused a delay in the replica’s final delivery. It was finally completed in 2001 when numerous small flights were achieved. The aircraft, powered by a 72 hp Simonini racing engine, managed to achieve a flight distance of 600 m (1,968 ft). After that, the aircraft replica was stored as an exhibit at the Zuccoli Collection at Toowoomba, in Australia.

A smaller-scale replica was built and flight-tested in 2001. Source: www.uasvison.com

Conclusion

The Stipa-Caproni represented an intended for the purpose of testing his new concepts in practice. While surely an interesting and unusual concept, Stipa-Caproni’s overall design was not that practical in reality, offering little improvement over a standard aircraft design of similar dimensions.

 

Stipa-Caproni  Specifications

Wingspans 14.3 m / 46 ft 10 in
Length 6.04 m / 19 ft 10  in
Height 3.2 m / 10  ft 7  in
Wing Area 19 m² / 204 ft²
Engine One 120 hp (89.5 kW) De Havilland Gipsy III
Empty Weight 595  kg / lbs
Maximum Take-off Weight 850 kg / 1,874 lbs
Maximum Speed 133 km/h / 83 mph
Landing Speed 68 km/h / 42 mph
Climbing speed to 3,000 m 40 min
Maximum Service Ceiling 3,700 m / ft
Crew 1 to 2 pilots
Armament
  • None

Illustration

 

Credits

  • Written by Marko P.
  • Edited by Henry H. & Ed J.
  • Illustration by Godzilla

Source:

 

 

 

A7He1 (He 112) in Japanese Service

Empire of Japan (1937)
Fighter Aircraft – Number Operated 30

During the war with China, the Japanese Air Forces encountered enemy fighters that were much better than what they currently had in their inventory. As their modern fighters were either under development or only available in limited numbers, they tried to acquire new fighters from aboard.  The options for acquiring such fighters were rather limited, and the Japanese turned to the Germans for a solution. This came in the form of 30 He 112 known in Japanese service as the A7He1.

The He 112 in Japanese service. Source: D. Bernard Heinkel He 112 in Action

A brief He 112 history

Before the Second World War, the Luftwaffe was in need of a new and modern fighter that was to replace the older biplane fighters in service, such as the Arado Ar 68 and Heinkel He 51.  For this reason, in May 1934 the RLM issued a competition for a new and modern fighter plane. While four companies responded to this request, only the designs from Heinkel and Messerschmitt were deemed sufficient. The Heinkel He 112 was a good design that offered generally acceptable flight characteristics and possessed a good basis for further improvements. The Bf 109 on the other hand had slightly better overall flight performance and was much simpler and cheaper to build. Given the fact that the Germans were attempting to accelerate the production of the new fighter, this was seen as a huge advantage over the He 112. Ultimately it would not be accepted for service, and only 100 or so aircraft would be built. These would be mainly sold abroad, with those remaining in Germany used for various testing and evaluation purposes.

He 112 the unsuccessful competitor of the Bf 109. Source: www.luftwaffephotos.com

While the He 112 project was canceled by the RLM, to compensate for the huge investment in resources and time into it, Heinkel was permitted to export this aircraft. A number of countries such as Austria, Japan, Romania, and Finland showed interest, but only a few actually managed to procure this aircraft, and even then, only in limited numbers.

Attempts to make a deal with Japan 

In 1937 a war between Japan and China broke out. While Japan had a better-equipped and more organized army, it faced stiff resistance. The Chinese were supported by the Soviet Union which supplied them with weapons and equipment, including aircraft. These caused huge concern within the Imperial Japanese Navy. Their newest fighters were either present only in small numbers or were still under development. As a temporary solution, IJN officials decided to approach Germany for assistance in the hope of acquiring new fighters.

For this reason, a military delegation was dispatched to Germany in the Autumn of 1937. Despite its later known fame, the German Air Force at that time was still in its early stage of rebuilding and realistically did not have much to offer, being in need of modern fighters themselves.  This would come in the form of the Messerschmitt Me 109. Its competing Heinkel He 112 lost the competition but was allowed to be sold abroad if anyone was interested. It was probably for this reason that the Japanese delegation visited the Heinkel factory at Marienehe. There they had the choice to observe the He 112 V9 aircraft. They were generally satisfied with what they saw and placed an initial order for 30 He 112Bs. If these proved to be as good as they hoped they would be, another, larger order for 100 more aircraft was to be given. As a confirmation of this agreement, the Japanese delegation returned with one He 112 aircraft that was to be used for familiarization and evaluation.

One of the 30 He 112 sold to Japan in 1938, Source: D. Bernard Heinkel He 112 in Action

Naming Scheme

As this aircraft was expected to enter service, it was designated as A7He1 by the IJN. The capital ‘A’ stands as a designation for a fighter. The number ‘7’ represents that this aircraft was to supersede the type 6 designation fighter. He stands for the Heinkel, and lastly the ‘1’ stands for the first variant of this type.  The Allied intelligence services discovered its existence within the IJP and awarded it the code name Jerry. 

Testing In Japan

Four aircraft arrived in 1937, and the last one arrived at the end of 1938. As the first aircraft began to arrive, the IJN began testing the A7He1’s performance in contrast to other fighters that they had in inventory, namely the Mitsubishi A5M2. While the A7He1 proved to be some 65 km/h faster, in other regards such as climbing speed and general maneuverability it proved equal or even worse than the Japanese fighter.  The Japanese were not satisfied with the A7He1 engine which was deemed too complex. These factors ultimately led the commission which examined it to propose that it should not be adopted, nor that any further orders should be given. After the arrival of the last A7He1, the order for an additional 100 aircraft was canceled.

Ultimate Fate 

As the A7He1 was not adopted for service, the IJN had to decide what to do with the 30 aircraft. They still represent a financial investment that could not be simply discarded. Some of these were allocated to various research institutes for future studies and evaluation, the remainder were given to training schools. None were ever used operationally in combat either in China or in the Pacific.

Quite surprisingly given their age and the rather limited numbers that were acquired, a few He1 survived the war and were captured by the Allies. One example was found in Atsugi airfield near Honshu in early October 1945. Unfortunately, the fate of these captured aircraft is not known but they were likely scrapped at some point after the war.

Despite the limited number of acquired aircraft, some of them survived the war and were later captured by the Allies. Source: www.destinationsjourney.com
Another aircraft (on the left) is being photographed by the Allied soldiers. It is possible that it was the same aircraft as in the previous photograph just taken later when it was being scraped. Source: www.destinationsjourney.com

Technical Characteristics

The He 112 was an all-metal single-engine fighter. The monocoque fuselage consisted of a metal base covered by riveted stress metal sheets. The wing was slightly gulled, with the wingtips bending upward, and had the same construction as the fuselage with a combination of metal construction covered in stressed metal sheets.

During its development life, a great number of engines were tested on the He 112. For the main production version, the He 112 B-2, the 700 hp Jumo 210G liquid-cooled engine was used, and some were equipped with the  680 hp Jumo 210E engine. The He 112 had a fuel capacity of 101 liters in two wing-mounted tanks, with a third 115-liter tank placed under the pilot’s seat.

The landing gear was more or less standard in design. They consisted of two larger landing wheels that retracted into the wings and one semi-retractable tail wheel. The He 112 landing gear was wide enough to provide good ground handling and stability during take-off or landing.

The cockpit received a number of modifications. Initially, it was open with a simple windshield placed in front of the pilot. Later models had a sliding canopy that was either partially or fully glazed.

While the armament was changed during the He 112’s production, the last series was equipped with two 7.92 mm MG 17 machine guns and two 2 cm Oerlikon MG FF cannons. The ammunition load for each machine gun was 500 rounds, with 60 rounds each for the cannons. If needed, two bomb racks could be placed under the wings.

Conclusion

While the He 112 was often portrayed as a modern fighter, from the Japanese point of view it proved to be disappointing in any case. While expecting a potentially effective fighter that was better with everything they had, the He 112 proved to be quite the opposite. After the 30 aircraft arrived no further orders were given. This only serves to prove that the old saying the grass is always greener on the other side is correct once in a while.

He 112B-2 Specifications

Wingspans 29  ft 10  in / 9.1 m
Length 30  ft 2 in / 9.22 m
Height 12 ft 7 in  / 3.82  m
Wing Area 180  ft² / 17 m²
Engine One 700 hp Jumo 210G liquid-cooled engine
Empty Weight 3,570  lbs / 1,620 kg
Maximum Take-off Weight 4,960 lbs / 2,250 kg
Climb Rate to 6 km In 10 minutes
Maximum Speed 317 mph / 510 km/h
Cruising speed 300 mph / 484 km/h
Range 715 miles / 1,150 km
Maximum Service Ceiling 31,170 ft / 9,500 m
Crew 1 pilot
Armament
  • Two 20 mm (1.8 in) cannons and two machine guns  7.92 mm (0.31 in) machine guns and 60 kg bombs

 

He 112 v5 as it was tested by Japan

Credits

  • Written by Marko P.
  • Edited by  Henry H.
  • Illustrations by Godzilla

Source:

  • Duško N. (2008)  Naoružanje Drugog Svetsko Rata-Nemаčaka. Beograd
  • J. R. Smith and A. L. Kay (1990) German Aircraft of the Second World War, Putnam
  • D. Monday (2006) The Hamlyn Concise Guide To Axis Aircraft OF World War II, Bounty Books
  • D. Bernard (1996) Heinkel He 112 in Action, Signal Publication
  • R.S. Hirsch, U, Feist and H. J. Nowarra (1967) Heinkel 100, 112, Aero Publisher
  • C. Chants (2007) Aircraft of World War II, Grange Books.
  • https://airpages.ru/eng/lw/he112_combat_use.shtml

 

Junkers J.I

German Empire (1917)

Reconnaissance and Infantry Liaison aircraft: 227 Built

Intro

The Junkers J.I represented a massive leap in aircraft design philosophy, while also being a truly exceptional combat airplane in its own right. Designed to fly close along the frontlines and support infantry operations, the J.I was uniquely capable thanks to its armor plated fuselage and duralumin construction. It was exceptionally durable, able to resist both machine gun fire and weather that kept its wood and canvas contemporaries grounded. As a reconnaissance, supply delivery, and ground harassment aircraft, the Junkers J.I was both the best of its day, and a sign of things to come.

Professor Junkers

Hugo Junkers holds a position of immense importance in aviation, being the creator of the all-metal airplane and the founder of one of history’s most famed airplane firms. Junkers himself was born in February of 1859 in the Rhineland Town of Rheydt, the third of eight children. He would not stay and work at the family textile company after leaving school, instead going on to study at the Universities of Berlin-Charlottenburg, Karlsruhe, and Aachen. He completed his studies in 1888, obtaining a degree as a Baumeister, or factory official, and entered the field of gas engine design in Wilhelm von Oechelhauser’s firm, the Deutsche Continental Gasgesellesschaft. In time, the two of them would go on to found a new joint venture, the Versuchsstation fur Gasmotoren von Oechelhaeuser und Junkers, a laboratory for gas engine development. His work at this laboratory would go on to see him develop the first opposed piston, two stroke engine, calorimeters for testing gasoline, and many smaller domestic appliances from gas stoves to water heaters. It was in 1895 that he founded Junkers and Co. in Dessau to manufacture these appliances, this venture also being the foundation for his later efforts in aviation.

Hugo Junkers circa 1920, following the end of the great war his firm built the first modern airliners. (wikimedia)

In 1897, he would both be made a Professor of Thermodynamics by the University of Aachen, and he would marry his wife Therese Bennhold. At the university, he was made head of the engineering laboratories, and founded his own workshop there to secure a place to continue his experiments. His work there would progress quickly from both his personal drive, and considerable funds from the patent revenue from the products he developed. This combination of experience with metalworking, a secure lab, and his considerable engineering talents, would see Prof. Junkers enter the field of aviation well equipped.

It was in 1910 that his colleague Prof. Hans Reissner would suggest he venture into the field of aviation, and the two would work together at the University of Aachen, building an experimental wind tunnel, and a very early all-metal airplane prototype. As these projects continued, he would go on to move all of his work to his own laboratory in Dessau. At this new lab, Dr. Junkers combined the experimental wind tunnel work from Aachen with his theories on aircraft design, notably, that of all-metal construction.

The Tin Donkey

Prior to the 1920’s the conventional materials and layout for airplane construction was a biplane made from wood, and skinned in fabric, with struts and bracing wires providing the structural support for the wings. Prof. Junkers felt that the inherently high parasite drag of biplanes, combined with the external supports, was a major handicap in aircraft design, and he believed that metal construction would completely revolutionize airplane development. Using a thick, rigid wing that was internally supported, the resultant aircraft would be aerodynamically cleaner, and the internal space within the wing could be used to store fuel or cargo.

His first major effort to build such an aircraft began near the end of 1914, as a privately funded venture with the assistance of the engineers Otto Reuter and Otto Mader. Initially, the project was funded by a large influx of cash from Junkers and Co., but they received Military support by June of 1915, and they were contracted by the Army to produce the new aircraft. Supplied with tooling and material’s from Dr. Junker’s own enterprise, they proceeded, and in four months they had built their plane.

 

The J.1 during its Army test flight. Despite their extremely similar designations the J.1 and J.I are completely different aircraft. (SDASM)

The Junkers J.1 was as revolutionary a design in airplane development as had been seen since the invention of the plane itself. It was a steel mono winged plane, and the first to feature cantilevered wings, which were spar-less and consisted of a steel framework welded to an inner, corrugated skin, over which it was skinned in smooth sheet steel. Aluminum alloys were sought after, but in the end, steel was all that was available. It proved to be an extremely sturdy, but also very heavy aircraft, weighing in at 1010 kg when set for takeoff. Beyond the original benefits Prof. Junkers envisioned for his new planes, the war, and the subsequent mass production of airplanes had shown there were more practical challenges in operating wood and fabric aircraft. As the number of airplanes increased, storage space became a premium, and canvas biplanes cannot be allowed to sit in poor weather lest their wooden frames and canvas skin become warped. Pilots in combat also soon discovered their greatest fear beyond the enemy’s guns, fire, which no matter how minor at first, often became a death sentence to anyone who’s plane began to burn. However, a metal aircraft with a canvas cover can sit in nearly any weather without issue, and a fire aboard such a plane isn’t liable to spread rapidly. A pilot could ditch his plane in most circumstances, saving him from a very grisly end.

The J.1 was taken to Doberitz where it would be tested by the Army, as Dessau lacked a proper airfield. Lt. Theodore von Mallinckrodt of the German Army would be the first to fly it, finding some novelty in a metal aircraft. Much of the test team was critical of the new plane, nicknamed the ‘tin donkey’, feeling that it would be too heavy to fly, and that it was suicide to fly a plane without bracing wires. Unbothered, the lieutenant began with short hops along the ground before the first full flight test in December. It flew well at first, but with harsh vibration being noted once the plane was brought to high speed. The Army team found the flight characteristics acceptable, but found that the wings had compressed the fuselage of the plane. They were also critical of its extremely low climb rate and lackluster turning performance, but all were impressed when the aircraft achieved a speed of 170 km/h in level flight, making it the fastest plane yet built. Even with its modest 120hp straight 6 Mercedes engine, its speed managed to impress ace pilot Oswald Bolcke who had a chance to inspect the aircraft the next year.

As an experimental aircraft, it was an undeniable success, having proven both that an all metal aircraft was well within the material restrictions of the time, and that massive reductions in drag were possible using this construction. The experimental plane was thus followed by a fighter aircraft, the Junkers J.2. Similar to, but far more refined than the ‘tin donkey’, the J.2 was the first all-metal fighter aircraft ever designed, but it was never accepted for service and the Idlfieg lost interest when it was clear certain performance metrics could not be met. As with the J.1, the fighter still used a 120hp engine, and with its smaller wings, it possessed even higher wing loading, as well as the sluggish climb rate of the experimental J.1. A new 160hp Mercedes engine also failed to bring the aircraft up to the necessary performance requirements.

 

The J2 featured some very modern design choices, including an underslung mid fuselage radiator. (Wikimedia)

However, the J.2 was not the only project of that year, as another design featuring new construction methods was also in the workshop through 1916. The Junkers J.3 would never be completed, but it was the first Junkers project to feature the famous corrugated duralumin skin. Given that it was still a fairly soft material, the bends in the skin would give it the necessary strength to not only act as lifting surfaces, but also structurally reinforce the entire structure by taking shear forces. It would also use a new tubular framework for the wings, built up around a set of stronger tubular spars. While this aircraft would never be finished, these new features would be carried over into the firm’s next design, which would prove to be its first major success.

Reconnaissance under fire

By the end of 1916, not only had the war on the Western front grown into a vicious battle for trench lines between an unsurvivable no man’s land, but aircraft had been proven to be an essential means of understanding the depth of this new and horrible form of warfare. Enemy trenches could only be surveyed from high ground, vulnerable to enemy fire, and the build up of forces were completely hidden from their traditional opponent, cavalry. Aerial reconnaissance thus became invaluable in mapping out labyrinthine trenchworks, finding the positions of enemy guns, and observing the movements of the enemy away from the front lines. Two-seater recon planes were adopted, and fighters were later developed to shoot them down and seize control of vital airspace, but through 1916 the offensive use of aircraft began in earnest. While a canvas biplane had no hope of attacking reinforced trench lines, unable to resist machine gun fire, they could attack enemy infantry at the foremost positions or as they moved through no-man’s land.

While Germany had employed ground attack squadrons in early 1916, it was the use of British infantry contact patrols using fighters and two-seaters through the battle of the Somme that spurred them to develop these tactics further. Moreover, they wanted specialized infantry harassment aircraft beyond their unmodified two-seater biplanes. Losses among these units were high, and the Idflieg, or the Inspector of Aviation forces, produced specifications for a specialized Infantry aircraft. This new plane was to be equipped with armor plate which would enclose the pilot, gunner, engine, and fuel stores with a minimum thickness of 5mm. They were also given a low minimum ceiling of 1500 meters, given they were designed for ground attack and low level reconnaissance. To make a note, this series was designated the I-type, but given the older German writing of I, it appeared as a J, and this series has subsequently been noted as the J type ever since.

The Halberstadt CL.II was built for reconnaissance and ground attack, though its wooden construction left it vulnerable to ground fire. (The Great War Channel)

Albatros and AEG both promised armored versions of their successful C.XII and C.IV models respectively, but Junkers approached the specification with a new concept entirely. While he was forced to build a biplane according to the Idflieg’s specifications, he was still granted considerable leeway with the design. Junkers himself would not be as hands on with this project as he had been the J.1 .2 and .3, over its necessity of being a biplane, so instead he elected to put the project in the hands of a team of engineers. The design of the Junkers J 4, would be managed by Dr-Ing Otto Mader, along with teams headed by the engineers Otto Reuter, Hans Steudel, and Franz Brandenburg.

While it was a biplane, the new aircraft still drew from the experiences and design philosophy of previous projects. Its wings featured corrugated duralumin skin over the multi-sparred, tubular duralumin framework and were in a sesquiplane arrangement, with the lower wing being significantly smaller in length and chord than top. They were connected by an inner set of struts, but being self supporting, they needed no bracing wires. Its armor protection was comprehensive, half of the fuselage consisted of an octagonal steel compartment which contained the engine, pilot, gunner, and fuel. Rear of this armored section was a tubular frame which ended with a conventional tail section. Unlike Junkers’ earlier underpowered efforts, this new plane was equipped with a significantly more powerful 200hp Benz B.IVa straight six engine. This model was among the more powerful aviation engines in German service, excluding those built for airships.

The massive Junkers J.I featured heavy armor protection and structurally redundant wings, it was exceptionally resistant to small arms fire. (SDASM)

Three prototypes were ordered on November 3rd 1916, and delivered the following January as J.425/17, 426/17, and 427/17. On the 28th, one prototype with the 200hp Benz IVa was flown by German officer Arved von Schmidt without armor plate for testing. Taking off from snow 20 cm deep, Schmitt took the plane up to 250 meters and reached a speed of 155 km/h, finding that the aircraft was stable, if tail heavy. The demonstration was impressive enough to get an order for 100 planes on February 19, 1917. The Junkers J 4 was thus accepted into service as the Junkers J.I, under the German Air Service’s designation system. Some minor changes before mass production included a redesigned vertical stabilizer, overhung balanced ailerons, and a balanced rudder.

Given that the workshops at Dessau had yet to receive an order for a mass produced aircraft, building the new planes at a fast enough rate proved difficult. There were two major challenges, first was that while Prof. Junkers was a brilliant inventor, he and his firm were fairly inexperienced when it came to aircraft production, and second, given that this was the first mass produced-all metal aircraft, the methods of mass producing an all metal plane would be learned with it. The Army foresaw this becoming an issue and brought in Anthony Fokker, a master in aircraft production, in order to set up an aircraft factory alongside Junker and Co. in Dessau. The new Junkers Fokker Werke AG. was thus established to build a completely new production line for planes, as subcontractors could not be used to build components, as was the case for wooden planes. The arrangement worked well, with Junkers and Co. engaged in the experimental work and providing designs, while JFA handled the job of meeting the production orders, which in total amounted to 350 planes. In spite of the new facilities, bottlenecking, and the loss of one of the armor plate manufacturers to flooding, would restrict the number of planes built to far below this number.

The Flying Tank

The first J.I to see service was the first off the production line, no. 100/17, which was sent to the front in August of 1917 where it served with the Flieger-Abteilug 19. On one of its first missions, the unit commander flew the plane on a low altitude recon mission near Ypres, Belgium, and found that the plane was not only faster and better handling than the Albatros and AEG J types, but that he had received 11 hits to his aircraft, without issue. FA-19 continued to fly the aircraft, and on one occasion on September 23, 100/17 was hit 85 times, without suffering serious damage.

 

The new armored two-seater would prove phenomenal, both in its resilience to enemy fire and less-than-ideal field conditions. (Wingnut Wings)

By October, the unit had accumulated enough experience to give an account on using the aircraft. In addition to its excellent protection from bullets and shrapnel, the plane could be flown confidently in weather that kept all others grounded, and it had an excellent glide ratio, which meant that in the event of engine failure, a pilot could still glide his plane back over to friendly lines and evade capture. However, it also required a long take off run and it had a higher landing speed than most aircraft. Luckily, these were issues that could be solved by instruction from more experienced pilots, and practice. Overall, the Junkers J.I proved to be an excellent aircraft from the appraisal of FA 19.

After its front line trials with FA 19, the Junkers J.I would begin to be distributed to the Schutzenstaffel, or protection flight units, whose job was to patrol the area between the opposing trench lines. This entailed a variety of missions from escorting two-seater recon aircraft to ground attack missions, with each unit consisting of some sixty seven men and six planes. Up until 1918, this role was filled by more versatile two seater aircraft like the Halberstadt CL.II, but come the winter of 1917, a small number of armored J type planes were entering service with them. This included four Junkers J.Is issued to the Schusta in December of 1917, a number which would grow to sixty by August of the following year, alongside 186 armored planes of other manufacturers. The nature of this change was revealed more fully when the Schusta were redesigned Schlachtstaffel, or attack flights, during the March offensive, as their escort role was dropped.

The Junkers J.I was used as a support aircraft whose role was primarily reconnaissance and infantry liaison work. The rear seat was equipped with a 7.62mm machine gun, and occasionally a 20mm Becker auto cannon in service, but ground attack was a secondary use of the aircraft. Its most important job was to survey areas of the battlefield that were in contention, to take photographs of bottlenecks in the terrain, or send reports of urgent developments directly to divisional HQ’s via wireless telegraph. First and foremost, the mission of J.I crews was to assist in communicating the state of the changing battlefield, an important task as in the spring of 1918 the war was again entering a mobile phase. Likewise, messages were also delivered from the HQ to the frontlines, as the telegraph wires were easily knocked out by artillery fire. Aircraft were directed by signalers, attached to infantry brigades, by the use of flares, lamps, and fabric strips to mark the position of friendly forces and enemy positions. Working with the signallers, the J.I’s crews could deliver messages to forward commanders from their headquarters, as well as supplies, like food and ammunition, to difficult to reach frontline positions.

A J.I crew prepares to drop canned food, water, and bread to a forward unit, an often overlooked task. While supply runners may not have been able to reach certain positions in daylight, crews like these could drop supplies from behind their aircraft’s armor plate. (SDASM)

In an offensive role, the most powerful tool accorded to the plane was its radio, which could be used to direct artillery, and could also be used to direct the plane to tenuous areas of the frontline to render support directly. While it was typically the job of the Schlachtstaffel to render support near friendly forces, and harass traffic behind the enemy lines, the lack of a bomb load and a standardized forward gun arrangement meant the offensive capabilities of the Junkers J.I were quite limited. The observer/gunner could engage using the mounted machine gun, but they were totally overshadowed by the lighter, unarmored two-seaters, which carried nose mounted guns and could be fitted with bomb racks.

In service, crews rendered excellent service with these aircraft, and many swore by them. One Lieutenant Wagner of Flieger Abteilung 268 flew a mission on March 28th, at an altitude of 80m over the front. During the mission, his observer was wounded, and his own helmet was shot through, but his plane, No. 128 received over 100 hits which did nothing to impede it. The Leutenant was amazed by this, as he’d overflown the enemy trenches, something that would have been suicidal in nearly any other aircraft. These encounters were fairly frequent, as one of the main tasks of the Junkers J.I units was to overfly the enemy trenches and locate the position and size of enemy reserves.

 

Ground crew maneuver a J.I in a photo for publication. (Wingnut Wings)

The Junkers J.I was considered totally unsuitable in aerial combat, given its low speed and ponderous maneuverability. Though, there is one known encounter between an American fighter and a Junkers J.I, which might very well be the only air engagement with the rare armored scout. Major Charles Biddle of the USAS 103rd Squadron, was flying his Spad XIII on May 15, 1918. While returning towards his side of the lines, after a weapon malfunction ruined an interception of a German recon plane, he encountered a ‘peculiar two seater’. Coming down to take a look, it lacked the hallmarks of most German planes of its type, but its unmistakable crosses marked it as an enemy plane. He also noted its extremely low speed, calling it ‘the slowest bus you ever saw’ and remarked he made two miles for its one. The Major dove on the plane and took up position fifty yards below its tail, then he made a mistake. He pulled up to take a shot at the Junkers, but he had misjudged the distance and ended up in the propeller wash of the German two-seater, shaking his aircraft and throwing off his aim. He dove to escape the view of the enemy gunner, but now was underneath his target. The German pilot then began to turn to bring the Spad into view of his gunner, and after several swerves to try to shake the American from beneath his plane, he succeeded. Now out of the Junker’s blind spot, Major Biddle was now the target of the gunner who, and in the words of the Major himself found himself in the crosshairs of “some of the quickest and most accurate bit of shooting that I had come up against”. The shot put a hole through the Spad’s radial engine and into Biddle’s left leg above the knee. He dove, to escape the gunner and head for friendly lines, wounded and with his engine failing. He landed in a field of shell craters, his plane turning over, in a fortunately escapable wreck. Major Biddle was likely the opponent of pilot Feldwebel Ernst Schafer, and Lieutenant Wilhelm Paul Schriber of Flieger Abteilung (A) 221, who subsequently overflew the plane and took photographs of their victory.

Construction

The all metal Junkers J.I used duralumin and steel for nearly everything but the engine braces and rear fuselage skin. (Peter M. Bowers via Fredrick Johnson)

The Junkers J.I was an all metal aircraft built from nickel-steel and duralumin. The forward fuselage was an octagonal compartment built from steel with an armor thickness of 5mm, though late production aircraft used a thickness of 3.5mm for their sides, and 6mm for the rear. The armor was impervious to small arms fire, and enabled the aircraft to overfly enemy trench lines at low altitude. The entire forward fuselage was built up around four large duralumin longerons, and joined to the rearward section, which had a tubular construction. The rear section was skinned with fabric, though the tail section was of duralumin construction with the rudder initially being fabric skinned, before it too was changed to corrugated duralumin later in production. Some very late examples of this aircraft had a corrugated aluminum skin over the rear fuselage, though these do not seem to have been delivered to the Army. The fuselage was joined to the wings by a series of steel tubes covered with protective aluminum fairings, and sat atop the lower wing. The undercarriage of the aircraft featured a conventional construction of two vees, connected to the axle through a shock absorber. The axel was a steel tube 9ft long, with it and the other structural elements being covered by aluminum fairings. The tail skid was of a simple wood construction.

 

The armored fuselage was manufactured at the Dillinger Panzerwerk from high tempered steel. (Flight)

The aircraft had a sesquiplane wing configuration with the upper wing having a span approximately 38% longer than the lower. The fine details are disputed, but the upper wing had a span of some 16m and a chord of 2.50/2.25m, the lower a span of some 6m and a chord of 1.50/1.08. The upper wing had a set of balanced, hanging ailerons. Both the upper and lower wings were built in three sections, consisting of an inner panel which was attached via steel tube struts to the fuselage, and two outer panels. The wings were built around multiple tubular spars made from 40mm tubular duralumin, with the upper wing possessing ten, the lower only five. These spars ran the length of the wing and were connected to a number of steel brackets which connected them to a framework of smaller tubes, which joined the spars and stiffened the wing. This design gave the wing both incredible strength, which needed no structural struts or bracing wires, and was extremely resilient to gun fire, as only when many of the brackets or spars were damaged would the wing become compromised. The wings were skinned in .3mm duralumin sheets which were corrugated to strengthen them, as the duralumin alloy was very soft, and was used as a structural element of the wing which bore shear forces. One aircraft, no. 749/18, was equipped with long span upper wings to lower the take off run of the aircraft, the modification did not make it into production.

 

The upper wing had ten tubular spars, not counting the aileron rod, and damage to any one of them was mitigated by others and the web of brackets through the wing. (Flight)

The control system of the aircraft also represented another departure from the conventional methods, eschewing the traditional wire control system for a more resilient push-rod system. The control systems were a duralumin stick and foot pedals for the rudders. The ailerons spanned the entirety of the outer wing panels and were connected to an aileron tube which ran parallel with the structural spars, which was articulated by linkages to the central control stick. The elevators had exterior stranded wires, which were articulated by the push rod system within the fuselage of the aircraft. The rudder operated much the same way. The cockpit furnishings were basic and the instrumentation consisted of a tachometer and fuel gauge, with a compass mounted on the wing.

The Junkers J.I was equipped with a 200 hp straight 6, Benz IVa engine. The similar 230 hp model had a dry weight of 370kg, a bore of 145mm, a stroke of 190mm, and a compression ratio of 4.91:1. It measured 1,990mm long, had a width of 530mm, and was 1150mm tall. It was water cooled, with the radiator mounted above the engine along the upper wing, its slats controlled by means of a lever above the cockpit. The fuel tank was a 98 liter seat-tank which took the place of the pilot’s typically wicker chair. It was made of sheet brass and had a channel through the back for the control rods for the tail section of the aircraft. It was divided into two sections so that a single bullet hole wouldn’t drain the entire tank. A pump drew fuel from this tank and delivered it to the gravity feed tank in the upper wing, if the pump broke the system could be driven by hand. A 38 liter oil tank was located behind the instrument panel. The engine was fitted with a 2.9m wooden propeller with a pitch of 1.9m. They were manufactured by Axial-Propeller Werke of Berlin and were issued with prop-spinners. The engine bay had two articulated panels which swung rearward to allow easy access to the Benz IVa engine, which was mounted atop two wooden engine bearers made from solid ash.

 

A Telefunken radio set, amplifier, and assorted gear. (stone vintage radio)

The plane could carry a variety of equipment for its missions, though these were mostly commonly a camera, and a wireless telegraph set. The observer, who was also the commander of the aircraft, operated both of these. The camera was a separate piece of equipment carried into and out of the aircraft by the observer and set within a built-in mount. This was set in the fuselage behind the armored section and accessible through a sliding sheet metal panel. The telegraph set was installed within the armored fuselage. Built by Telefunken, the W.T. was standardized across the service. It consisted of a sturdy, protected case and a 37 m aerial, with the alternative Huth made transmitter having a 38 m length.

In regular service, the aircraft carried no forward mounting weapons and carried only a rear mounted gun within a swivel mount, which was set within a turning wheel around the observer’s seat. This allowed him to traverse the gun 180 degrees and take aim at targets above and below the aircraft. This was a largely defensive weapon, but could also be used in a limited anti-infantry role. The gun was either a parabellum MG 14 or, more rarely, a Becker 20 mm autocannon.

 

An observer with an MG 14. Like the British Vickers gun, it was a redesigned Maxim variant that reduced the size of the weapon significantly. (airwar.ru)

The MG 14 was a 7.62mm machine gun derived from the common MG 08 in service with the German army. However, it was much more compact as the toggle-lock mechanism was reversed to a downwards action, it used an internal spring, and the ejection system was made to drop casings out the bottom of the receiver rather than the front. The result was that the receiver was narrower and slimmer compared to the more cumbersome infantry machine gun. They were also equipped with a buttsock and pistol grip, with some examples being equipped with an Oigee magnified reflector gunsight. The water cooling system was not used, and the jacket was perforated to reduce weight. The gun was fed from a cloth ammunition belt which was spooled within a metal drum, with one carried on the weapon and two in reserve. It had an adjustable rate of fire between 600-700 rounds per minute. An experimental armament of two fixed, downward facing machine guns for trench strafing was installed on one aircraft, but was not used in service.

A very advanced weapon for its day, the Becker autocannon would go on to influence the development of the 20mm Oerlikon gun. (mnemonic-shapeways)

The 2cm Becker autocannon was a powerful, if cumbersome weapon. It operated on API blowback and was loaded with ten and fifteen round box magazines. Ammunition loads could consist of solid shot or high explosive shells, which could prove absolutely devastating against canvas biplanes and effective at harassing infantry. It did however have a relatively low muzzle velocity of 490m/s and a slow rate of fire, between 250 and 300 rpm, depending on the manufacturer. These were installed aboard a few Junkers J.Is, but the machine gun armament was far more common.

Each plane came with a repair kit for surface damage and the following spare parts: 1 undercarriage axle, 2 spare wheels without tires, 1 tail skid with spring, 1 complete set of structural struts and associated connecting parts, 2 trestles, 1 lifting jack, 1 set of tools, and riveting materials.

Flying and Servicing

The Junkers J.I was a ponderous, but steady aircraft to fly. Its top speed was decent for a two-seater, at 145 km/h, but its climb rate was extremely low. It took 77 minutes to reach 3km, though in service it typically operated below 1km, which only took 12 minutes to reach. Coupled with its wide turning circle, the plane earned itself nicknames like the flying ‘Tank’ or ‘Mobelwagen’, or translated, moving van. Given its low speed, it was typically given escorts. Its controls were responsive, though were different enough from its contemporaries to need some practice getting used to. The stick for instance could become shaky and uncomfortable to use if inputs were harsh and jerky. Its landing speed was also notably high, and it required a longer run for take off and landing, preferably made on compacted ground. These issues aside, most pilots were fairly confident in the aircraft, and when flown it was a very stable, especially in the wind and rain, which kept everything else grounded.

 

The Junkers J.I was often a difficult adjustment for pilots, though its stable handling characteristics and robust construction made for a safe re-learning period. (Wingnut Wings)

Crewmen were also very appreciative of the incredible amount of protection the aircraft afforded, allowing missions that would have otherwise been considered suicidal to be completed with a high level of confidence. Not only were all of the critical components of the aircraft all located within a nearly impervious armored compartment, but the wings were extremely durable and unlikely to fail even when struck continuously by machine gun fire. Perhaps best of all, the risk of fire damage was extremely low, and the fire resistant construction would give the pilot time to set the plane down. When all else did fail, and the engine gave out, the aircraft had a good glide ratio, and despite its weight, it could travel some distance without power, allowing the crew to cross back to friendly lines, or look for a safe place to ditch. Overall, the Junkers J.I was in all likelihood, the most durable aircraft to see action during the Great War, and certainly the best of the armored J type aircraft in service with the German Luftstreitkrafte. In the end, only one confirmed combat loss was noted in over its one year of service, performing one of the most dangerous missions.

 

A high landing speed and a need for compact ground meant that numerous J.I’s that  were taken out of action in accidents like these. Few were serious and the planes were typically sent back to depots for repair. (Wingnut Wings)

Its metal construction also gave a number of advantages in the field. Most convenient of all was the fact that it could be stored outside in bad weather. While wood and canvas could not be allowed to stay wet and needed shelter from the rain, a Junkers J.I only needed to have its engine and crew compartments covered. The plane was also designed from the outset to be easily transportable, the wings, tail section, and struts could be easily decoupled and placed alongside the fuselage, allowing it to easily fit in a railcar or trailer. The lack of bracing wires made this easy, and also removed a great deal of the maintenance work. Basic repair tasks were fairly simple, and every plane came with a patching kit that made combat repairs easy, but specialized training was needed for larger components. Extensive repairs usually required the planes to be sent to depots where specialists could work on them, and was usually done in the case of extensive damage to the wings or fuselage. Larger single-piece components, like the struts, were simply replaced with spares if damaged.

Conclusion

The Junkers J.I proved to be a pivotal design in airplane development, as it not only introduced to the world a mass produced all-metal plane, but it also incorporated so many other innovations, such as its cantilevered wings and use of corrugated duralumin. They would provide a practically indestructible plane to what would have been very vulnerable crews, and in the years to come, these features would put Junkers well ahead in the civil air industry.

Junkers J.I
Engine Benz BIVa
Engine Maximum Output 200hp
Empty Weight 1766kg
Combat Load 410kg
Maximum Speed 155 m/h
Combat Ceiling 3km (operational)
Armament 1xMG 14 or 1 x 2 cm Becker Autocannon
Crew 1x observer 1x pilot
Length 9.20m
Height 3.45m
Wingspan 16m
Wing Area 50.84m

Illustrations

J.100/17 was the first to enter service with the Army testing it in frontline use in the Autumn of 1917.
As the Junkers armored planes began to enter more widespread service, crews began to fashion their own camouflage schemes. Mauve stripes became a fairly common pattern among these aircraft. Flieger-Abteilung 17, 1918.
Late production aircraft had their fabric skinned vertical stabilizers and tail sections replaced with duralumin sheeting. The fabric sections of the aircraft often went unpainted, and left in the dyed lozenge camo patterns it was delivered with. Unknown unit, based at Villiers de Chevres, 1918.

Credits

Written and edited by Henry H.

Illustrated by Arte Belico

Sources

Primary:

Instruction Manual for Junk. J. I Armored Biplane. Junkers-Fokker-Werke A.G. Dessau. Translated and reproduced in Flight The Aircraft Engineer & Airships Vol. 12. 1920.

Report on the Junker (sic) Armoured Two Seater Biplane, Type J.1*. Ministry of Munitions. Reproduced in Flight The Aircraft Engineer & Airships Vol. 12. 1920.

Secondary:

Junkers Aircraft of WWI Vol 1 Junkers J.1-J.4. Owens, Colin A. Aeronaut Books. 2018.

Junkers J.I. Grosz PM. Albatros Productions. 1993.

Junkers 52 A History 1930-1945. Forsyth, Robert & Creek, Eddie J. Crecy Publishing 2014.

German Observer’s Guns. Woodman, Harry. Albatros Productions 2001.

German Air Forces 1914-1918. Sumner, Ian. Osprey Publishing Ltd. 2005.

MS 406 in Croatian Service

Independent State of Croatia flag Independent State of Croatia (1943-1945)
Fighter –  36 to 46 Operated

During the Second World War, the German puppet state the Nezavisna Država Hrvatska NDH (Eng. Independent State of Croatia), tried to develop its own Air Force. Unfortunately for them, its German and Italian allies simply did not have the industrial resources, nor spare planes to allow them to build a significant air force. Still, the NDH’s persistence in asking for such equipment paid off in 1944 when they received over 30 captured French MS 406 fighters.

The Morane-Saulnier MS 406 in NDH service. Source: T. Likso and Danko Č. The Croatian Air Force In The Second World War

History

After Italy’s unsuccessful invasion of Greece, Benito Mussolini was forced to ask his German ally for help. Adolf Hitler agreed to assist, fearing that a possible Allied attack through the Balkans would reach Romania and its vital oil fields. In the path of the German advance towards Greece stood Yugoslavia, whose government initially agreed to join the Axis side. This agreement was short-lived, as the Yugoslav government was overthrown by an anti-Axis pro-Allied military coup at the end of March 1941. Hitler immediately gave an order for the preparation of the invasion of Yugoslavia. The war that began on 6th April 1941, sometimes called the April War, was a short one and ended with a Yugoslav defeat, and the division of its territory between the Axis powers.

With the collapse of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, Croatia, with German aid, was finally able to declare independence, albeit becoming a fascist puppet state. It was officially formed on the 10th of April 1941. The new state received a significant territorial expansion by annexing most of western Yugoslavia, including Bosnia, parts of Serbia, and Montenegro.

While the conquest of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia proved to be an easy task for the Axis, holding these territories proved to be much more difficult. This was mainly due to two resistance movements that were actively engaged in sabotage, destroying railways and bridges, and attacking isolated occupation units’ positions and strong points. Despite attempts to suppress these attacks, the resistance movements, especially the Communist Partisans, grew rapidly, forcing the Germans and their Allies to introduce ever-larger occupation forces. The NDH forces were especially targeted as they committed mass murders and deportations to concentration camps. Thanks to the German help, they managed to form a small Air Force that in its inventory consisted of all kinds of obsolete, and in rarer cases, new equipment. By 1943, it was in the process of reorganization and the NDH officials during this time often asked their German overlords for more modern aircraft. Sometimes they even portrayed their own Air Force as weaker than it was.

The NDH Air Force was particularly poorly equipped with fighter aircraft. Luckily for them, the Germans at that time occupied what remained of Vichy France, capturing all kinds of military equipment. This also included the MS 406 fighters which was agreed to be sent to NDH by the end of 1943.

A Brief MS 406  History

At the start of the Second World War, the Morane-Saulnier MS 406 was one of the more modern French fighters built using metal components whose development began in mid-1930s. The first prototype under the designation MS 405 made its maiden test flight on the 8th of August 1935. Following successful testing and good performance, the French Ministry of Aviation issued a request for the first 50 aircraft in February 1938. Given the rising tension in Europe at that time the order was eventually increased to an additional 825 aircraft to be built. By the time, the French surrendered to the Germans over 1,000 aircraft of this type were built.

French Morane-Saulnier MS 406 fighter. Source: Wiki

The MS 406 was a good design that was nearly equal to the German Bf 109 models near the start of the war. During the War with the Germans in 1940, the MS 406 managed to achieve some success against the Germans but ultimately proved incapable of stopping the enemy. Some 300 aircraft of this type would be lost during this brief war, either due to the action of enemy fighters, ground anti-aircraft fire, or accidents. The MS 406 also achieved some success on the foreign market with 12 being sold to China, 30 to Finland, and the Swiss obtained a license for production. Poland also expressed interest in acquiring 150 aircraft of this type but nothing came of this as a result of the German invasion that began in September 1939.

In NDH service

The precise number of available MS 406 or the date when they arrived is not clear.  According to A. Pelletier ( French Fighters Of World War II in Action) the NDH received 46 MS 406 in early 1943. Author V. V. Mikić ( Zrakoplovstvo Nezavisne Države Hrvatske 1941-1945) on the other hand mentioned a lower number of 38 which began to arrive at the end of 1943 and early 1944. These aircraft received registration numbers from 2301 to 2338.  According to T. Likso and D. Čanak (The Croatian Air Force In Second World War) between 36 to 38 were sent to the NDH during 1944.

In late 1943, these aircraft, together with Italian-supplied Fiat G.50s, were to be used to equip the 11th Group consisting of three squadrons (21st, 22nd, and 23rd). The MS 406s were expected to arrive at the start of 1944. The first operational units were to be formed by mid-February. To help train the pilots, one Seiman 200 and ex-Yugoslav P.V.T aircraft were to be supplied. The training operations were carried out at Lučko airfield, starting from October 1943.

Once in Croatia, the MS 406 was used together with the Fiat G.50 fighter aircraft. Source: Wiki

The situation in the air and the ground significantly worsened for NDH at the start of 1944. It was especially hard-pressed as the Allies began bombing operations in occupied Yugoslavia. Thanks to their advances in Italy, they managed to set up many air bases from which these attacks could be launched. They bombed many military installations including ammunition depots, fuel production facilities, and NDH airfields.

An NDH MS 406 w heavily damaged during one of many Allied bombing attacks. The aircraft while damaged beyond repair was not written off, as it was used to cannibalize any usable spare parts. Source: T. Likso and D. Čanak The Croatian Air Force In The Second World War

On the 5th or 6th of April 1944, the Lazužani airfield where the NDH 5th Air  Base was located was bombed by the Allied 2nd SAAF Squadron. They managed to completely destroy 11 and damage 20 more aircraft. One MS 406 was destroyed when an Allied bomb landed next to it. The pilot Cvitan Galić did not survive the explosion. The loss in material was such that the 23rd Lovačko Jato was disbanded. Another MS 406 was lost during a second Allied bombing run on Borongaj and Lučko air bases that occurred on the 12th of April 1944.

In March 1944 Hrvatska Zrakoplovna Legija HZL (Eng. Croatian Air Force Legion) arrived at the NDH capital Zagreb. This unit was formed way back in 1941 and was in direct control by the Germans. Its pilots participated under German controls on the Eastern Front and were quite experienced. The Germans demanded that at least two MS 406s be given to this unit to be used as training aircraft. The NDH officials could do little not to comply.

By 15th September 1944, there were 19 available MS 406 aircraft. Of this number only 7 were fully operational. On September 18th, or on the night of the 21st the sources are not clear, the Partisan forces managed to capture an NDH airfield near Banja Luka. Some 30 ,or 11 depending on the source, aircraft stationed there were captured. The NDH personnel either joined the Partisans or fled leaving behind valuable equipment and supplies. The Partisans managed to capture 3 MS 406 fighters, two were under repair. These were used against their former owners, but one was damaged in an accident and was written off.

In late 1944, the few surviving MS 406 were used in desperate attempts to stop the victorious Partisans forces that were liberating Yugoslavia from the Axis occupiers. By this point, the NDH Air Force could do little to stop them given the chronic lack of fuel. Unfortunately, the precise information about the fate of many NDH aircraft in the last few months of the war was not recorded well. While the Partisans managed to capture a few MS 406 their use was limited at best, and unfortunately, none of them is known to have survived the war.

An MS 406duirng the winter of 1944. Source: T. Likso and D. Čanak The Croatian Air Force In The Second World War

Camo and markings

The MS 406 appears to have been left in German late time war type camouflage. This usually consisted of  Dunkelgrun (Eng. Dark green) and Grau  (Eng. Grey) on the upper aircraft surfaces, and  Hellblau (Eng. Sky Blue) on the lower surfaces. A standard Croatian white and red checkerboard coat of arms was painted on the wings and the fuselage sides. Starting from 24th February 1945 the NDH Air Force introduced the use of a black trefoil that was painted on the aircraft fuselage sides.

Near the end of the war, the NDH Air Force introduced the use of a black trefoil that was painted on the aircraft fuselage sides. Source: https://ww2aircraft.net/forum/threads/morane-saulnier-ms-406.50613/page-2

Technical Specification

The MS 406 was designed as a low-wing mix-construction fighter.  Its designers went for a conventional construction aircraft design. The fuselage frame was made using aluminum tubes connected and covered with Plymax. This is a  composite material that consists of layers of aluminum and plywood. The wings were constructed using a combination of spars and steel tubes also covered in this material. It was powered by one 860 hp Hispano-Suiza liquid-cooled engine. Most produced aircraft used a three-bladed two-pitch propeller, while some received variable-pitch propellers. The armament consisted of one 20 mm (0.78 in) Hispano-Suiza S9 cannon and two 7.5 mm (0.29 in) MAC 1934 machine guns. The cannon fired through the propeller shaft.  The total ammunition load for the cannon was 60 and for the two machine guns 600 rounds.

Conclusion

The MS 406 was one of the few more modern fighter aircraft that was available in any significant number. But despite that, it was already obsolete and could realistically do little against Allied bombers and fighters. It was mostly used to fight the advancing Partisan formations. Few remaining aircraft were used in this role up to the end of the war.

MS 406  Specifications

Wingspans 10.6 m / 34  ft 10  in
Length 8.13 m / 26 ft 9  in
Height 2.71 m / 8  ft 10  in
Wing Area 17.1 m² / 184 ft²
Engine One 860 hp Hispano-Suiza 12Y-31 liquid-cooled engine
Empty Weight 1,900 kg / 4,190  lbs
Maximum Take-off Weight 2,426 kg / 5,790  lbs
Climb Rate per minute 850 m / 2,790 ft
Maximum Speed 485 km/h / 302 mph
Range 1,000 km / 620 miles
Maximum Service Ceiling 9,400 m / 30,840 ft
Crew 1 pilot
Armament
  • One 20 mm (0.78 in) cannon and two 7.5 mm (0.29 in) machine guns

Illustration

 

Credits

  • Article written by Marko P.
  • Edited by  Henry H.
  • Illustration by Godzilla

Source:

  • A. Pelletier (2002) French Fighters Of World War II in Action, Squadron/Signal Publication
  • Duško N. (2008)  Naoružanje Drugog Svetsko Rata-Francuska. Beograd
  • V. V. Mikić, (2000) Zrakoplovstvo Nezavisne Države Hrvatske 1941-1945, Vojno  istorijski institut Vojske Jugoslavije.
  • T. Likso and Danko Č. (1998) The Croatian Air Force In The Second World War, Nacionalna Sveučilišna Zagreb
  • J. R. Smith and A. L. Kay (1990) German Aircraft of the Second World War, Putnam
  • D. Monday (2006) The Hamlyn Concise Guide To Axis Aircraft OF World War II, Bounty Books
  • T.L. Morosanu and D. A. Melinte Romanian (2010) Fighter Colours 1941-1945 MMP Books
  • D. Bernard (1996) Heinkel He 112 in Action, Signal Publication
  • R.S. Hirsch, U, Feist and H. J. Nowarra (1967) Heinkel 100, 112, Aero Publisher
  • C. Chants (2007) Aircraft of World War II, Grange Books.

 

 

 

 

ANT-1

 USSR (1921)
Experimental Single-seat light aircraft – 1 Prototype Built

While the Russian Civil War was raging on, there were early attempts to rebuild its shattered aviation industry.  Aviation engineers and enthusiasts attempted, despite the chaos around them, to build small experimental aircraft to test their ideas and concepts. One such young individual was Andrei Nikolayevich Tupolev. His ANT-1 was a specialized design to test the concept of using metal alloys in aircraft construction.

The ANT-1 experimental aircraft. Source: www.globalsecurity.org/military

History

Tupolev began his career as an aircraft engineer in 1909, when he was admitted to the Moscow Higher Technical School. There he met Professor Nikolai Yagorovich who greatly influenced Tupolev’s interest in aviation. In the following years, he spent time developing and testing various glider designs. When the First World War broke out Tupolev managed to get a job at the Russian Dux Automotive factory in Moscow, which produced a variety of goods, including aircraft. There he gained valuable experience of aircraft manufacturing.

Andrei Nikolayevich Tupolev was one of the greatest Russian/Soviet aviation engineers and designers. Source: Wiki

In 1917, the October Revolution plunged the disintegrating Russian Empire into total chaos. The few aircraft manufacturing centers were either abandoned or destroyed. All work on the design and construction of new aircraft was essentially stopped. The Dux was one exception and continued to work at a limited capacity. It was renamed to Gosudarstvennyi aviatsionnyi zavod (Eng. State aircraft factory) or simply GAZ No.1. Given that he was one of few aviation engineers left, with most skilled either being killed or fled the country, Tupolev remained working for the GAZ No.1. He spent a few years working on various projects such as designs improving weapon mounts for older aircraft that were still in service.

In 1921, Tupolev was elected as the deputy of the Aviatsii i Gidrodinamiki AGO (Eng. Aviation and Hydrodynamics Department). This department was tasked with developing various aircraft designs but also including torpedo boats. In 1921 he and his team from AGO began working on a new aircraft design that was to test new concepts. Two new innovative features were that it should be a monoplane, and be built using mainly metal alloy. Its primary purpose was not to gain any production orders, but instead to serve as a test bed for new ideas and concepts. The aircraft was named ANT-1, where ANT stands for the initials of  Andrei Nikolayevich Tupovlev.  This designation should not be confused with a snowmobile developed by  Tupolev, which shared its name.

During this period, Soviet aviation officials and the German Junkers company spent years negotiating the possibility of producing a Duralumin alloy that could be used for aviation construction. Junkers proved the validity of this concept on the J.I saw service during the First World War. The German company wanted to avoid sanctions on arms and aviation development imposed by the Allies, while the Soviets wanted the technology for themselves, not wanting to depend on the Germans entirely. The Soviet Union in 1922, managed to produce their own copy of Duralumin known as Kol’schugaluminiyem alloy. The name was related to a small village Kol’chugino where this factory was located. Limited production of this alloy began in 1923.

Due to problems with the production of the new alloy, Tupolev was forced to postpone the development of his new aircraft until 1922. At that time the alloy was not yet available, so Tupovlev decided to go on with a mix-construction design, but mostly using wood. The benefit of using wood was that it was an easily available material, with almost unlimited supply in Russia. It was cheap and there were plenty of skilled woodworkers. However, there were also numerous flaws in using wooden materials. The greatest issue was a generally short service life in harsh climates as in Russia, in addition, standardization of spare parts is almost impossible to do.

Tupolev himself preferred the new metal technology believing that it would offer many benefits to the aircraft industry,  giving new aircraft a lighter and stronger overall construction. Tupolev eventually decided to go for a mixed-construction solution. His decision was based on a few factors, such as the general lack of this new material, and he wanted to be on the safe side as using metal in aircraft construction was still a new and not yet fully proven concept. In addition, he wanted to be sure about the Aluminum alloy material’s quality before proceeding to design a fully metal aircraft.

Once the choice for the construction material was solved the next step was to decide whether it was to be a single or two-seat configuration. The wing design was also greatly considered. After some time spent in calculations and small wind testing, the choice was made to proceed with a single engine and low-wing monoplane.

For the engine, three different types were proposed including 14hp and 18 hp Harley-Davidson and a 20 hp Blackburn Tomtit. Despite Tupovlev’s attempts, he failed to acquire any one of these three. It was not until early 1923 that he managed to get his hands on an old 35hp Anzani engine which was over 10 years old by that point. Despite its poor mechanical state, Tupovlev knowing that nothing else was available decided to try salvage it.

Testing and the Final Fate

The construction of this aircraft took over a year to complete. Given the general chaos at that time, this should not be surprising. It was finally completed in October 1923, and the first test flight was carried out on the 21st of October of the same year. Despite using the older engine, the flight proved successful. It was piloted by Yevgeni Pogosski.

The completed ANT-1 test aircraft. Source: www.globalsecurity.org

Following this, the ANT-1 was used mainly for various testing and evaluation. It would see service in this manner for the next two years. In 1925 the aging engine finally gave up, and this made the aircraft unflyable. Tupovlev tried to find a factory that could potentially refurbish it. He ultimately failed, as the engine was simply beyond repair by that point.

The aircraft was for some time stored at Factory No.156.  The fate of this aircraft is not clear in the sources, however, there are few theories about what happened to it. After Tupovlev’s imprisonment by Josef Stalin, his plans and documentation were confiscated. The aircraft was believed to be also confiscated and scrapped in the late 1930s. Another possibility is that it was moved to another storage facility where it was eventually lost during the Axis Invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941.

Specification

The ANT-1 was designed as a cantilever low-wing monoplane aircraft of mixed construction. The fuselage consisted of four spruce longerons. The lower two were connected to the wing spars and  were held in place with four bolts. The parts of the fuselage starting with the pilot cockpit to the engine were covered in the metal alloy. This alloy was also used to provide additional strength of some internal wooden components of the aircraft fuselage. The pilot Pilot cockpit was provided with a small windscreen. Inboard equipment was spartan consisting only of an rpm counter, oil pressure indicator, and ignition switch.

The cantilever wings were made of single pieces. At the end of the two tips  (on each side of the wings) large wooden spars were installed. Some parts of the wing were built using metal parts such as the wing ribs,  The rest of the wing was mainly covered in fabric. The tail unit was made of wood, its surfaces were covered with a metal-fabric cover.

The fixed landing gear consisted of two large wheels. These were connected to a metal frame which itself was connected to the aircraft fuselage. Small rubber bungees acted as primitive shock absorbers.

Given that nothing else was available, the ANT-1 was powered by an old, refurbished 35-hp strong Bristol Anzani engine.

A good view of the ANT-1 internal wing and fuselage construction. Source: www.globalsecurity.org
The cantilever wings received on each side one large wooden spar. Source: Wiki
The pilot cockpit received only a few basic instruments and a small windshield. Source:www.globalsecurity.org

Conclusion

The ANT-1 despite its simplicity, and being built a single, cobbled-together prototype, could be considered a great success for Tupolev. Through this experimental aircraft, Tupovlev gained valuable experience in designing an aircraft by using metal alloy. This success emboldened Tupovlev to go even further and design and build the Soviet first all-metal construction aircraft known as ANT-2. The ANT-1 was Tupovlev’s first stepping stone in a long and successful career as an aircraft designer in the following decades.

ANT-1 Specifications

Wingspans 7.2 m / 23ft 7 in
Length 5.4 m / 17 ft 8 in
Height 1.7 m / 5 ft 7 in
Wing Area 10 m²  / 108 ft²
Engine One 35 hp Bristol Anzani engine
Empty Weight 230 kg / 5,070 lb
Maximum Takeoff Weight 360 kg / 7,940 lb
Maximum Speed 125 km/h / 78 mp/h
Range 400 km / 250 miles
Maximum Service Ceiling 600 m /  1,970 ft
Maximum Theoretical Service Ceiling 4,000 m / 13,120 ft
Crew 1 pilot
Armament
  • None

 

Gallery

 

 

Credits

  • Article written by Marko P.
  • Edited by  Henry H.
  • Illustration by Godzilla

Sources:

  • Duško N. (2008)  Naoružanje Drugog Svetsko Rata-SSSR. Beograd.
  • Y. Gordon and V. Rigmant (2005) OKB Tupolev, Midland
  • P. Duffy and A. Kandalov (1996) Tupolev The Man and His Aircraft, SAE International
  • B. Gunston () Tupolev Aircraft Since 1922, Naval Institute press