Tag Archives: Fighter

Official classification tag

Mitsubishi J2M Raiden “Jack”

Empire of Japan (1942)

Fighter – 621 Built

The Raiden proved to be an oddity during the Second World War. Beset by numerous technical challenges, it entered service amidst the most brutal air campaigns of the Second World War. (Phillip Jarrett)

Intro

The J2M Raiden, Japanese for Thunderbolt, was developed to provide the Japanese Navy with an interceptor for the defense of its bases in China and across the Pacific. While it was designed with many of the most advanced technologies available to Japanese aviation, its development was fraught with technical issues and resource competition with the Navy’s premier fighter, the A6M Zero. After several years in troubled development, it entered service in the last line of defense against the American Army Air Force and Navy, which had taken the war to the skies over Japan itself.

Foundations

Japanese military aviation began early, but ambitiously, with the Navy launching its first naval air attacks from the seaplane carrier Wakamiya against various German targets during the First World War. There was little damage done with these light, and very crude, seaplane bombers, yet it was clear that as the technology matured, aviation would take a key role in any future conflict.

Following the end of the first world war, Japan claimed former German territories across the pacific, and sought greater control over China, then embroiled in a brutal civil conflict. The Washington Naval treaty would affirm the integrity of Chinese territory regardless of the wars, and assure equal economic rights for those wishing to trade in the region, and the Empire of Japan would not contest these principles through the 1920’s. However, its armed forces nonetheless planned and lobbied for ambitious policies that would wrest control of most of Asia from the Chinese, and the Pacific from the Europeans and United States of America. However, as a still nascent industrial power, Japan had much to learn regarding the cutting military technologies that they would need to challenge their many planned opponents.

A longstanding alliance with the United Kingdom had brought rapid advancements in both military and related civil fields. This was only one part of a military partnership that had once challenged Russian ambitions in Asia, and had led them against the Germans in the Great War. By the end of that war, this alliance was wearing thin, with both sides now holding opposing goals across Asia and the Pacific. Yet one final major transfer of technology would catapult Japanese aviation ahead, before military coordination with Britain finally lapsed. Following a request for technological assistance in aviation in 1920, the Sempill mission was organized to bring Japanese expertise in aircraft design and development up to modern standards. While there were clear concerns that this technology might be used to challenge British interests in the future, major economic partnerships and sales with Japan proved a stronger motivation.

The mission arrived at Kasumigaura in 1921, led by former RAF officer Baron Sir Williams Frances-Forbes. Along with a cadre of experts in airplane design, construction, and use, the mission brought a collection of aircraft. Over a hundred planes in total were delivered to Kasumigaura, accounting for modern military aircraft of every type available to the mission planners. To the Japanese military, this technology exchange was as generous as they could have hoped for, and put them on a faster track to self-sufficiency. This massive leap in technical abilities would define Japanese aviation moving forward, giving their industry a firm grasp on modern construction techniques and technologies, but still lacking depth in manufacturing.

While they would continue to be reliant on licensed equipment for the years to follow, they now had a strong technical foundation from which to build on. Just as this assistance ended, so too did the alliance with Britain, which lapsed in 1923. The very same year, the Navy would select the United States as its chief ‘hypothetical enemy’, against which future war plans would be focused.

War Games

The aviation industry was slow growing, beginning with cottage industries that eventually grew into major enterprises, that later made the leap from licensed equipment to their own designs. The largest of these manufacturers were Mitsubishi, Nakajima, and Kawasaki, which provided the nucleus for the rest of the cottage industry based aviation sector. Arguably the largest of these was Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, through its branch, the Mitsubishi Internal Combustion Engine Co. at Kobe. Concurrent with the Sempill mission, the company’s aircraft manufacturing effort was shifted to Nagoya, which would remain the center for Mitsubishi’s aircraft development and production. In the years to come, additional production plants would sprout from the main facilities in Nagoya, with separate air frame and engine departments being founded by 1935.

Given the state of aviation in Japan in the late twenties, the first major war plans against the United States made very little use of aircraft, with the plan being to draw the US fleet into Japanese territorial waters where it could then be devastated in a decisive battle, the outcome of which would decide the fate of untold millions. The rationale and foundation for these plans was to develop superior technologies in key areas, and in all others, the supposed superior qualities of the Japanese soldier would allow them to persevere, confident in the belief that material shortcomings were minor impediments to seizing a victory that was destined. In practice, they initially sought to out-match the enemy in the areas of long range gunnery and torpedo warfare, to claim a decisive edge against an enemy which was beginning to eclipse them. Yet, in time, the need to master the air would come before all else, as it became clear air power could make up for disparities elsewhere.

The battleship defined naval might for nearly half a century. Against these behemoths, the airplane would maintain a small supporting role, before the technology matured and it took center stage. (oldtokyo)

Battleships defined the plan until the mid 1930’s, with aviation playing a very small role until several crucial technical developments were rolled out. Aircraft at the time had a very limited range of action, had small payloads, and were very fragile. The coming war for the Pacific would be waged against a number of very powerful opponents, and such a battlefield would be vast and feature the most powerful pieces of military equipment in existence, modern warships. It was the development of all-metal, streamlined, monoplanes that proved to be the deciding factor in shifting the idea of the airplane as a defensive weapon and reconnaissance tool, to a deadly offensive weapon. The ability to conduct strikes of greater power, and scout ever larger swaths of ocean continually pushed the boundaries of military planning. The hypothetical decisive battle was taking place further than the originally conceived battlefield in Japanese home waters, and by the late 1930’s, it was judged to take place around the Marianas.

In the Navy’s plans, torpedo and dive bombing aircraft were pursued enthusiastically, with fighters far less so. Seen as a mostly defensive weapon, there was little development in their advancement or tactics between the Sempill mission and the end of the 1920’s. This changed after a pair of RAF officers were invited to present a five month fighter course in 1930, and a larger fighter maintenance and employment course was provided the next year, again with RAF personnel. The naval air combat program would soon grow under Lt. Kobayashi Yoshito, Lt. Genda Minoru, and Lt. Okamura Motoharu at the Yokosuka Naval Air Base. By this time, there were two major issues with the program, the first being the general reluctance for defensive tactics by the Japanese Navy, and the fact that bombers by this time were capable of out-pacing their pursuers. With their relatively crude Nakajima Biplane fighters, there was little that could be done to face and bring down modern bombers. Yet the fighter advocates held out, and waited for new planes, ones that could demonstrate their necessity on carrier flight decks and naval air bases.

Horikoshi and the Zero

By the mid 1930’s, there was a swell of engineers who had been schooled in the advancements brought forth by the Sempill Mission, and a good number who had traveled abroad to see new technologies and techniques in use with the forerunners of aviation. It was this latter group that was the most pessimistic about Japan’s ability to wage war against the US, as they were witness to America’s vast manufacturing potential and technological expertise in all the fields relevant to the war in which their own work would one day contribute. During this time, Japan had invaded Manchuria, and planned for a greater war which could place China in their orbit. Needing to modernize, the Navy sought to push past the old Nakajima N4A, which had become very dated by 1934, and obtain a fighter which could match the performance of the bombers it chased. New high speed fighter requirements were prepared by Lt. Cmdr. Sawai Hideo from the Department of Engineering at the Naval Air Arsenal, and released to the industry.

Horikoshi Jiro had studied at the brand new Department of Aeronautics at the University of Tokyo, which at the time, numbered only 39 people, staff and students. From there he went on to work at the Mitsubishi Internal Combustion Engine Co. at its aircraft department, working first on the basic, yet essential tasks of running performance and strength calculations, and designing various components. In time, he would be selected to study foreign methods of aircraft construction, and would travel to Germany, France, Britain, and the United States to tour factories and study the planes they built. While Japan was clearly still lagging behind the leaders in aeronautics, he knew a quick path to design parity was only a few leaps away.

However, despite his belief Japan could find a way to produce its own cutting edge military aircraft, Jiro remained pessimistic about the Empire’s chances in a war with the United States, having toured the aircraft manufacturing plants in America himself. He would remark in later years, after learning of the attack on Pearl Harbor, that “-The majority of us who had truly understood the awesome industrial strength of the United States never really believed that Japan would win this war. We were convinced that surely our government had in mind some diplomatic measures which would bring the conflict to a halt before that situation became catastrophic for Japan.” Yet well before the dawning of the Pacific War, he continued his work in pushing the boundaries of aeronautics in Japan.

The Mitsubishi Ka-14 test aircraft would be developed into Japan’s first modern fighter, it was nothing less than the leap Horikoshi envisioned for Japanese aviation. (Aviation of Japan)

Understanding that the monowing fighter would be the future of its class, with its obvious advantages in drag reduction and strength, he would pursue designs of this type from his first attempt. It would not go well, as there were many technical challenges that had to be overcome, but overcome he would, and his next design would prove phenomenal. For the 1934 Naval requirements for the year 9 carrier fighter, he would submit the Mitsubishi Ka-14, later modified into the A5M fighter. A superlative modern fighter, it impressed the Navy enough to purchase a large number of the aircraft.

The A5M would prove to be the start of an exceptional career for one of the era’s foremost aeronautical engineers, a major leap for the Japanese aero industry, and it gave the Japanese Navy proof that fighters were an essential investment in any future war. It proved a decisive success in China, but as is always the case, a successor needed to be planned for. For the next carrier fighter, the Navy released the planning requirements for the year 12 carrier fighter. They had effectively asked for the impossible, a plane that needed to be able to act as an interceptor, a long range escort, and air superiority fighter. To make a long story short, Horikoshi managed to design a plane which met the requirements, and produced the A6M Type 0 fighter.

Horikoshi Jiro, pictured center. His meteoric rise with the A5M and A6M would see him at the center of a number of new projects. Soon overworked, he found himself trying to design two new fighters for the navy, while keeping the Zero up to date. (wikimedia)

In addition to this aircraft, which would become the primary fighter of the Japanese Navy, another design would be requested in October of 1938. A local fighter, a dedicated interceptor to defend Japanese positions in both China and the Pacific from enemy bombers. While a seemingly simple request, it represented a rapid and enormous shift in naval strategy. At the outset of the 1920s, the airplane was little more than a novelty which played a supporting role. Experience in the agonizing war in China showed that bombers could now threaten the Navy’s ports and airfields, such that a specialized aircraft was needed to counter them. Gone was the reluctance that dogged officers like Lt. Genda in pursuing a purely defensive aircraft.

The fact that the Navy was developing a land based fighter at all, while the Army had several designs at its disposal, was a factor of the vicious inter-service politics that defined their relationship. Both vied for supremacy over control of national politics and industrial resources, and so competitive that they denied each other use of the same designs. Concurrent with the Navy interceptor project, the Army was also seeking an aircraft for the same role, in their case the Ki 44 Shoki. Resources spent on these parallel efforts were a major handicap to both the Army and Navy, and would prove catastrophic to the overall Japanese war effort as later events would show.

The Navy’s request for the interceptor called for a maximum speed of 323 kts at an altitude of 6 km, a landing speed no greater than 70 kts, an endurance of 45 minutes, a take off run of 300 m at full load and with no wind, and it had to have the same armament as the A6M fighter, being two 20 mm machine guns, and a pair of 7.7mm guns. It was also the first Japanese fighter required to carry an armored plate behind the seat back to protect the pilot.

It was in many respects the reverse of the Zero, where maneuverability and range were sacrificed to achieve the highest possible rate of climb. However, unlike the Zero, significantly fewer resources would be available for the engineers working on the aircraft. With the Zero being made the premier fighter of the Japanese Navy, a constant stream of improvements would be ordered over the next several years, straining both the development of the Raiden, and other Mitsubishi aircraft, namely the G4M bomber.

A Troublesome Development

The original design of the Raiden featured only two exhaust stacks, and a cooling fan driven by airflow. Like many of its early features, they proved inadequate in their purpose and were replaced. (japanese-warship)

The first major design decision came in the form of the choice of engine, with two major contenders. The Aichi Atsuta, a 1200 hp V-12, and the Mitsubishi Kasei 13, a new 14 cylinder radial. The Atsuta was a licensed development of the Daimler Benz DB 601A, and as was the case with most licensed foreign designs, was being sold as it was no longer a cutting edge design in its own country. Nevertheless, the Army would use the licensed engine in their own Ki 61 fighter, developed by Kawasaki as the Ha40. Aichi was within the Naval military industrial sphere, and thus unavailable for Army orders. Despite both engines looking identical and being derived from the same common model, they had few interchangeable components and fittings due to differing Army and Navy requirements, and the different manufacturing practices between the firms. This level of parallel effort was both extremely expensive, and not at all uncommon. For the Raiden design team, the DB 601 derivative presented a light, streamlined engine, but also one with more limited paths for improvement.

The Kasei was still in its teething period, but was substantially more powerful and had better prospects for further development. While the engine’s higher fuel consumption was not problematic given the short range requirements, its size forced some compromises. To reduce drag, the engine was set much further back from the nose of the aircraft, with an extension shaft running through the tapered cowling to the propeller. The space was also shared by the oil cooler, supplied with air from an air flow driven fan. Further aerodynamic streamlining came from setting the canopy in a shallow frame, and the use of an advanced high-speed wing with aerofoils incorporating research in laminar flow. While maneuverability was not a primary concern of the aircraft, it would receive ‘fowler flaps’ which could be deployed via a button on the yoke, enabling the aircraft to make tighter turns in combat, at the cost of speed.

The Raiden incorporated a number of advancements in aerodynamics, most notably “laminar flow” aerofoils. As with other nation’s attempts, they did not achieve laminar flow, but reduced drag and improved dive performance. (Lancero99)

The Raiden’s development was plagued by numerous technical issues from a very early stage. There were issues with the engine, the cooling system proved inadequate given the small inlet for air at the nose, and the canopy proved to be extremely cramped with major restrictions in visibility. Worse, it competed for resources with the Zero, which included the already overworked engineer Horikoshi himself, who was also tasked with designing its successor. While being developed well before the coming war with the United States, the prototype wasn’t ready until February, 1942.

The Raiden first flew on March 20, 1942 at Kasumigaura, revealing a number of major faults. Numerous engine related issues cropped up, most notably trouble with the propeller’s constant speed governor and heavy vibration. Navy pilots who went on to test the aircraft were also extremely frustrated with the curved canopy, which not only restricted the range of view, but also caused optical distortions at certain angles, which were especially pronounced on the landing approach.

However, it flew notably well, featuring high stability and responsive controls. These were not able to overshadow the aircraft’s more visible faults, and inability to meet project goals. It failed to exceed 311 kts at its target altitude, and failed to reach its time to altitude requirements. Beyond the need to increase its overall performance, members of the IJNAF’s Air Arsenal required a redesign of its canopy, and improvements to its constant speed propeller mechanism, which proved to be one of the most troublesome issues in their several weeks of testing.

The canopy was most easily remedied, replaced with a more conventional design with flat windscreen panels. However the engine remained a more vexing problem. Several issues were intertwining to make further development far harder. First was the relatively new Kasei 13 engine itself, with its own teething issues, second was the inadequate oil cooler, and there was the fact that the engine itself was to be replaced with an even newer model to allow the plane to reach its required performance, which brought its own uncertainties. The Kasei Model 23 would prove much more powerful, and a later model would add methanol-water injection, the anti-detonation properties of which allowed the engine to run at higher manifold pressures, allowing it to produce 1800 hp. There were also more minor improvements, such as the introduction of a new oil cooler beneath the nose, the air driven cooling fan was replaced with a mechanically driven one, and the addition of exhaust stacks for each cylinder. Along with the engine came a new four bladed VDM propeller with a re-balanced governor, to address the unreliability of the previous model. There was much confidence in the new engine, which was premature.

The J2M1 also had a low set canopy with a curved front windshield. While it was aerodynamically clean, it proved a serious handicap to pilots. The fowler flaps are shown deployed. (Aces Flying High)

Operating the engine at a high output would prove troublesome, with excessive exhaust smoke, and extreme vibration being apparent from the outset. The smoke proved simple enough to address via the fuel injection system, but the vibration would remain with the aircraft through its entire career. It was brought up to Horikoshi that the use of the extension shaft might be the cause, though he adamantly denied this. He was at least partially correct, as the propeller design left much to be desired. In time, the vibration issues were addressed through the use of rubber buffers on the engine mounts, which along with the redesigned propeller governor, reduced vibration to manageable, but still noticeable levels. While Japanese aviation had a number of enviable technologies at its disposal, its propeller designs lagged behind that of the US. Harmonics were thus an issue that limited the performance of all Japanese high performance engines, but were particularly harsh on the J2M.

The J2M2 resolved the canopy issues, added additional exhaust stacks, and an engine driven cooling fan. Later in its development an additional nose mounted oil cooler was added to improve cooling during long climbs in tropical heat. (zbiam)

The aircraft was re-designated J2M2, but prototyping and pre-production continued at an extremely slow pace. To make matters worse, a pair of J2M2 were lost in early testing, just as the aircraft was being prepared for large scale introduction. One was lost on a basic test flight on June 16, 1943. The test pilot, Lt. Hoashi Takumi, lost control of the aircraft and struck a barn after trying to regain control after take off. He died when the aircraft caught fire shortly after the crash. In a non-fatal incident that occurred a month later, test pilot CPO Sasakibara Masao managed to land the J2M2 after encountering major handling issues. This incident offered no explanation for its cause, which was only discovered weeks later. On another test flight, a Mitsubishi test pilot, Shibayama Eisaku, found that the yoke was pulled forward when the landing gear was retracted. Being at a higher altitude than Lt. Takumi was when he started to retract the gear, he was able immediately lower it, and regained control of the aircraft. On some aircraft, it was found that the retracting tail wheel was coming to rest against the elevator controls. The problem was remedied, though only by late 1943.

While technical issues continued to plague the development of the Raiden, the Navy was still conducting tactical and performance tests with the prototypes. In the autumn of 1943, the Navy had several prototypes of the new fighter at its disposal, a number of them the older J2M1. The Yokosuka Air Corps would put these aircraft in mock dogfights against their A6M3 Zeros, finding the J2M1 was at a serious disadvantage when using the typical Navy fighter tactics, which favored horizontal maneuvering over climbing and diving. Its true strength was in energy fighting, with the pilot keeping to a high speed and expending little energy through more aggressive horizontal maneuvers, and outmaneuvering them by attaining a higher energy state. Unfortunately, this point was not stressed in their reports, and pilots stuck to the more traditional tactics that the aircraft was less suited to.

Their attempts in mock interceptions of bombers also proved troublesome, not for any purely performance related reasons, but that the J2M1 fighters they were using were very unreliable. As was the case in earlier tests, the propeller governor failed when the aircraft was put through harsh maneuvers, and in another instance, a throttle had gotten stuck in the forward position. Veteran pilot and Ace, CPO Oh-hara Ryoji, experienced both such failures, and performed multiple unpowered landings in the fighter.

The J2M2 and J2M3 eventually resolved into a serviceable, but still rough around the edges interceptor. Its development was slow, as Mitsubishi was primarily concerned with producing the vital G4M bomber, and A6M fighter for the Navy, whose fortunes had turned for the worse. (Japanese-warship)

Troubles aside, development of the fighter continued, resulting in a new J2M3 model with a heavier armament of four 20 mm guns, and an improved oil cooler. The weight of the new equipment would again put it behind the performance figures set in place then five years ago, though the heavier armament would prove important in facing the resilient heavy bombers in service with the US. These improvements aside, they were unable to trace the issues of the harsh vibrations from the engine, and proceeded to production regardless, believing the measures in place to be sufficient. After much delay and considerable frustration, the Raiden was moved toward mass production at the end of 1943, at a relatively low figure of some 20 aircraft per month. Only 90 would be built in 1943, with only another 274 the following year, most being the J2M3 Model 21.

Its production was mostly motivated out of desperation. The Navy had at its disposal only one major fighter model at that time, the Zero, which had gone from dated, to obsolete, from mid 1943 to early 1944. It was supposed to have been succeeded by the A7M, which failed to proceed past prototyping. Making matters far worse, in the land based land interceptor role, the Raiden was now years behind schedule, leaving vital forward anchorages to be defended by the aging Zero. The Navy’s alternative to the troubled Raiden was the N1K-J Shiden, though it would not materialize in the numbers needed for many months. Thus the Raiden was to be produced in limited numbers, being the only fighter the Navy was confident could intercept American bombers, especially the newly discovered B-29 which intelligence services had identified well before its debut.

In dealing with this particular threat, there were attempts to fit the Raiden with a high altitude engine. A J2M4 was thus created with a turbo-supercharged Kasei engine, and a J2M5 was built with a three speed supercharger. The turbo-supercharger proved far too unreliable for service, with the three speed supercharger proving to be somewhat more manageable. While both experimental models did have much better high altitude performance, neither were able to be employed, leaving the Navy without a high altitude interceptor.

The Whirlwind

By the start of 1944 the war had been fully reversed against the fortunes of the Japanese. The long, grueling Solomons campaign had drained them of the corps of elite airmen they had carefully cultivated since before the start of the war, and US industry was producing enormous amounts of war materiel. The situation was soon to grow even worse as the United States began to prepare the deployment of one of its newest, and most advanced weapons.

Japanese intelligence services first became aware of the B-29 after reading of the death of a test pilot flying a new Boeing bomber in early 1943. They would soon produce speculative performance capabilities for the new bomber based on what they knew of the known abilities, and likely new improvements, of the US aviation industry. They proved to be reasonably correct in their efforts, and concluded that major raids against Japan could be expected by early summer 1944. The bomber was first deployed to a base in China, at the Chengtu complex, a distant and difficult to reach airfield, which proved to be far from ideal to keep supplied, and offered a limited ability to strike at the Japanese mainland. They first raided the rail lines in Bangkok in June of 1944, as they prepared for a greater offensive. Their first raid over Japan took place on the night of June 15/16, and mirrored the operations of RAF Bomber Command, with pathfinders going ahead of a long, dispersed line of bombers to mark targets. This effort, and the many that would follow would prove unsuccessful, night raids were an exceedingly difficult affair that demanded the highest levels of flying proficiency, and high altitude operations would be complicated by the powerful jet stream, which also reduced the accuracy of daylight raids considerably.

Basing the B-29’s would prove to be a challenge, with most locations being either too exposed, or too remote. American victories in the central Pacific opened the route for raids against Japan. (National Archives)

These many issues aside, the B-29 made a considerable impression across Japan. It was an opponent that was advanced as it was elegant, its tendency to catch fire due to the use of a magnesium alloy accessories case, was unknown to those who faced it in combat, or the civilians who endured its presence. Author Kosaka Masataka would note its “beauty and technological perfection” which to his mind symbolized the mark of “higher civilization” achieved by the United States. One of the first Japanese airmen to encounter the new bombers, ace and night fighter pilot 1st Lt. Isamu Kashiide, would be awestruck at the sight of a B-29 that had been coned by searchlight. Remarking, “I was scared! It was known that the B-29 was a huge plane, but when I saw my opponent it was much larger than I had ever expected. There was no question that when compared with the B-17, the B-29 was indeed the ‘Superfortress’!”

These encounters would grow in frequency and lethality as the raids mounted. The Chengtu complex was supplemented by new bases in the Western Pacific, notably the enormous base on Tinian, and the appointment of a new, aggressive commander, General Curtis LeMay. Against them was the dwindling cadre of experienced Japanese airmen, who had relatively few advanced interceptors to call on.

The Raiden In Combat

With the end of its less than ideal development cycle, the Raiden made its service debut with the 381st Air Group, in October of 1943. However, after constant teething issues with the aircraft, and a fatal accident resulting from an unidentified air frame failure, the squadron would have its Raidens exchanged for Zeros before their deployment to the Philippines, and the Dutch East Indies, in March of the following year. In September, after several months in combat, they received some ten J2M3 Raidens while deployed to the Celebes. The combat debut of the new aircraft came with some success, as during an intercept of a large number of American B-24 bombers, one victory was credited to the new fighter. They continued their service there, and found the new aircraft to be a potent combatant, with noted success against American P-47 and P-38 fighters, as unlike the zero, Raiden pilots could escape them at lower altitudes and were still able to comfortably outmaneuver them.

Long accustomed to the Zero, many struggled to make use of a plane whose strengths lay in its energy retention and dive speed. (Japanese-warship)

The 381st continued its service through the Battle for the Philippines, defending Japanese positions around Manilla, and later, the oil industries in the region. There were also Raidens in service with other units, notably the 301st Air Group which served in the central Pacific, which struggled, making use of the older and less reliable J2M2, and facing considerable opposition from massed American air power in the region. There were otherwise a handful of other aircraft serving in outlying theaters on a mostly provisional basis, with very little known of their use.

Aluminum Overcast

The American air raids against Japan were to enter their penultimate and most brutal stage in early 1945. Earlier raids were done from high altitude, and did so with the difficulties of having to juggle the difficult basing situation in Chengtu China, and the weather. The weather proved frustrating for lack of access to intelligence gathering in the region, save for the Soviets who refused the use of their services to maintain their neutrality, and whose broadcasts were shrouded by constantly changing codes. However, General Curtis LeMay would employ new tactics allowing him to side-step the issue of the weather, and the Americans had constructed new bases in the Marshall Islands which would allow for the comparatively easy amassing of bombers. LeMay chose low altitude, incendiary saturation bombing, the most blunt, and brutal of the methods available to him. Earlier, smaller scale incendiary raids, including one against the Mitsubishi works at Nagoya had proven successful, though they soon pivoted toward targeting cottage industries in urban areas, and the civilian population. This shift in tactics can occurred rapidly, seen in a single raid on February 25 of 1945, where some 200 B-29’s raided Tokyo which saw fires burn uncontrolled across a large swath of the city.

The B-29 was among the most advanced aircraft of the Second World War. Once they ranged over the skies of Japan in large numbers, the Pacific war was to enter its final phase. (National Archives)

To make a desperate situation worse, when LeMay’s XXI Bomber Command began raiding Japan in force, they weren’t alone. On February 16th, a major incursion performed by carrier based aircraft swept across the shores of Honshu, launched from Task Force 58, which accounted for 16 fleet carriers, and 116 warships in total. Admiral Mitscher would sortie 1,187 planes; 895 fighters, 201 torpedo bombers, and 91 dive bombers. They would contest control of Japanese airspace, and strike at the targets LeMay had not, mostly factories producing materiel for the Japanese war effort. The next day, he launched another 1,574 sorties before departing southward to engage the Japanese forces on Iwo Jima. In this uneven fighting, he lost only 80 planes to all causes with the Japanese claiming 134 kills. With the subsequent loss of Iwo Jima, came the first encounters with P-51 mustangs, now based from that island. They first came north on April 7th, where they quickly showed themselves to be a dangerous opponent.

The Japanese defensive situation during this time period grew from difficult to dire. The quality of the aircrews had declined even further after the disastrous encounter in the Philippine sea, and the following American invasion of the Philippines itself. There, the Navy had spent its last strength in an attempt to prevent American forces from staging a landing, following a plan which could never have hoped to succeed. The merchant marine had also been decimated, and the heart of the Empire was thus seeing shortages of every kind. There were no offensive means by which the war could be fought, and the enemy was closing in from all sides. Despite a situation which could only resolve itself in a painful defeat, the Japanese armed forces chose to continue the war in the hope for a conditional end to hostilities.

There was little hope for anything approaching a favorable outcome in continuing the war, yet fatalism ruled, and the country marched on. The exuberance of the early victories was gone, the hopeful energy of the early Solomon campaign had faded, and China remained vast and unconquered. In the Autumn of 1944, ace Navy Pilot Lt.jg Sakai Saburo returned to Tokyo, after several years on campaign and the loss of an eye. “The city appeared drab and lifeless. – Most of the stores were closed, their windows empty. The significance was clear. There were no goods to sell, and the owners were away, working in war plants. The few stores that remained open hardly resembled the colorful and well-stocked establishments I once knew. Few goods were on display, and for the most part these were crude substitutes.” It was this city that was to become a battleground in the months to come.

Just as pressing as the approaching American forces, the division between Japan’s air forces, Army and Navy, would prove a critical fault which saw them face this storm almost totally unprepared. Despite the early warning of the B-29 threat, there was no comprehensive plan for the defense of the Japanese mainland from air attack, the strategic outlook of both forces was one defined by delusion and self-sabotage. From the outset, the Army and Navy each had their own jealously guarded industrial complexes, possessed few compatible munitions, and operated aircraft with no common base for components. Army and Navy aircraft of similar design did not even possess a common voltage. They pursued aircraft development and research separately, further dividing the pool of expertise and industrial base, which were dwarfed by their rivals in America. The Navy commissioned some 53 models of aircraft for which there were 112 variants, and the Army 37 models with 52 variants. Making matters worse was the failure to prepare, and expand aircraft production in wartime. The Ministry of Munitions was only finally established in 1943 to better convert Japanese industries for military use. In 1944, its head, Fujihara Ginjiro, found that with the ideal utilization of Japan’s industries, the level of annual aircraft production could have been as much as 53,000, rather than the 8,000 to 10,000 which were being turned out. While the figure is purely theoretical, it nonetheless demonstrates the widely impractical decision making that dominated Imperial Japan’s industrial planning.

The P-51 would become a major threat to Japanese defenders, just as it had been over the skies of Germany. Here a fighter squadron flies assembled alongside a B-29. (National Archives)

Even critical pieces of equipment, such as early warning radar, were developed separately, and hoarded to build separate networks with little collaboration. The Army used its Tachi-6’s and 7’s, and the Navy its ground based Mark I radar system, serving only to divide the already relatively small Japanese radio industry. Any real potential for the defense of Japan had been sacrificed in favor of inter-departmental politicking. When the Americans returned to the skies of Japan in strength, the two Japanese air forces would meet them with too few aircraft, too poor early warning capabilities, and no real strategic plan.

What few hopes there were could be found in a new generation of fighters. During 1943 and 1944, Japanese fighters had lagged behind considerably their American opponents, largely due to their engines being less powerful. In the last months of the war, there were new models in service which gave some parity with the Allies. These new fighters were the Ki 84, N1K-J, Ki 100, and to an extent, the J2M3 Raiden, which was  at one point to be phased out by the Navy’s new N1K-J fighter. Given the desperate situation over the looming bomber offensive, and concerns over shortfalls in the supply of fighters, its production was instead boosted. With the proper planning, one or two of these fighter types could have taken up the bulk of the defensive effort in greater numbers, but the division of resources and the lack of any coherent strategy would prove fatal. In early 1945, the Japanese Air Forces had only some 500 fighters between acting in the defense of the homeland.

The Last Line – 302nd Air Corps

The 302nd Air Group would be the longest serving of the three units supplied with the Raiden to serve in the defense of Japan. The unit was formed March first, 1944, and was to be equipped with 48 Raidens, and 24 J1N1 night fighters, which was not irregular, as many other Japanese air corps operated more than one type of aircraft. This was often a mix of fighters and maritime bombers, though in the case of the home defense units, the combination of interceptors and night fighters was to give them a 24 hour, all weather defense capability.

Japan’s defenders employed a bewildering number of single-engined fighter types, mostly spawned from the total non-cooperation between the Army and Navy in developing and procuring aircraft. Left to right: J2M, N1K-J, A6M, Ki 44, Ki 61, Ki 84, Ki 100. The top three are Navy aircraft, the rest belonged to the Japanese Army Air Forces (wikimedia, rodswarbirds)

The 302nd was deployed to Kisarazu, and later Atsugi, in Tokyo, to act in the defense of the Kanto region. The 302nd was the first, and among the most colorful of the three Raiden units established for the defense of Japan. It was a mix of mostly green airmen with a few veterans, among whom was possibly the most irregular officer in the service of the Japanese navy. Lieutenant Junior grade, Akatsumaki Saadaki had nearly a decade of service under his belt, and had built a steady reputation for disorderly conduct, drinking, womanizing, casual violence, and being an otherwise first rate combat pilot. His stories of his combat prowess and carousing were legendary, and according to fellow airman Lt.jg Sakai Saburo, all lies. Nevertheless, he would be a pillar of the unit alongside CPO Nakamura Yoshio, a veteran of the withering Solomon Island campaign, and Ensign Isozaku Chitose, an ace pilot with over ten years experience, from China to Rabaul. The unit was led by the fiercely patriotic Captain Kozono Yasuna, another Solomon island veteran, and a night fighter pilot with considerable experience.

Along with its odd mixture of experience, the 302nd also lacked for its new aircraft, with the priority of new Raidens being the 301st, elsewhere in the central pacific. The unit thus initially flew a considerable number of zeros, and older Raidens that had remained in Naval inventory, these being old preproduction J2M2’s, delivered in their orange test liveries. These proved to be a more challenging aircraft for the green pilots that made up much of the air group, and Lt.jg Akamatsu set aside the Raidens for his veterans, ensuring they were well versed in emergency procedures and dead stick flying. This would prove vital, given the poor quality of many of the aircraft they were given. It was only in May of the following year that they would eventually receive their 48 Raidens, though the Zeros would remain to substitute for unserviceable planes, and for the use of pilots not experienced enough for the more powerful Raiden.

The self proclaimed “King of Aces”, Lt.Jg Akamatsu Sadaaki. (wikimedia)

The 302nd attempted several intercepts through 1944, most of these being lone, high flying F-13’s. They typically ended in failure. These aircraft were the photo reconnaissance model of the B-29 bomber, and free of a heavy bomb load, could prove very difficult to intercept without ample warning thanks to their high speed, and operating altitudes at and above 9 km. Other attempts to intercept larger formations also proved difficult, and success wasn’t noted until late in the year. On December 3, 1944, the 302nd sent 24 of its Raidens amongst the 74 Japanese fighters sortied against a raiding force of B-29’s. They saw some success, bringing down three B-29’s, with another two lost to the 244th Sentai’s “special attack” unit of the Japanese Army Air Force. Flying specially prepared, and armored, Ki-61’s, they performed ramming attacks against the American bombers. The ramming pilots survived their attacks, but Lt.jg Saadaki was deeply frustrated by these tactics, enough to discourage their use among his younger, and more impressionable airmen. There would be considerably more of these novices in their number, as many older veterans were eventually transferred away to establish new fighter units. In time, Lt.jg Akamatsu would also be transferred near the end of the war to train for a posting for a potential rocket-powered interceptor unit.

Shorn of some of its most venerable airmen, including Ens. Chitose, the 302nd would also soon find that following February, 1945, B-29 raids would be conducted at night, when only the unit’s J1N1s could pursue them. Despite the reduction in daylight raids, they would still have to contend with the presence of American fighters which began constant operations over Japan. The first encounters came as a result of Admiral Mitscher’s raids in mid February, 1945. Against them the Raiden crews proved their worth, claiming to have brought down eight Hellcats, for the loss of two Zeros, and three damaged Raidens. On the second day, they claimed a further seven Hellcats for the loss of two zeros, though the Raidens did not see combat that day. While they could contend well with the Hellcats, they would find a more dangerous opponent in the F4U Corsair, and the P-51D Mustangs, which they first encountered on April 7th.

In addition to the 302nd near Tokyo, two other Raiden units were raised for the defense of Japan, this included the 332nd near the Kure Naval arsenal, and the 352nd, near the Sasebo Arsenal. Here airmen of the 332nd pose before one of their interceptors. (rods warbirds)

Flying long sorties from Iwo Jima, American airmen fought cramps and the Pacific heat during their seven hour missions. Fatigued and bored, they nonetheless made for deadly opponents over Japan. The Mustang’s Packard Merlin engine was powerful from the sea level to high altitudes thanks to its two stage supercharger, its aerodynamic form saw it lose little speed in performing acrobatic maneuvers, and its laminar flow wings and sealed and balanced control surfaces gave it near unparalleled maneuverability at speeds other aircraft had stiff, and even unworkable controls. On the day they were first seen over the Kanto plain, they claimed three J1N1 night fighters, one D4Y2 dive bomber, and a Raiden. The heavier aircraft were capable bomber hunters when enemy fighters were of no concern, but as the Mustang had done in Germany when it made its appearance the previous year, it denied the use of these otherwise effective aircraft.

Despite complaints from Japanese Airmen, the Raiden could outperform the Hellcat comfortably, and its combat flaps gave it an edge in close-in maneuvers over the newer American P-51 and F4U Corsair. (Japanese-warship)

The 302nd would struggle to cope with the influx of Mustangs which made their presence immediate, and known. On April 12, while XXI Bomber Command was raiding the Musashino aircraft plant, they were joined by 104 P-51, who engaged Japanese fighters attempting to scramble, and strafed their airfields. Around the Kanto region, it thus became very difficult to actually reach the bombers given the presence of the P-51s, who were tasked with engaging the Japanese interceptors before they had a chance to make contact with the B-29s.

A small detachment of the 302nd was also sent to the southern home island of Kyushu, where they had more success against the smaller formations of raiders, which flew with a more modest escort. They still remained difficult targets, as bringing down a B-29 could take three passes, and the bombers were well defended by computer-assisted defensive guns.

In the last months of the war, the 302nd continued to take action against the American air forces which had become an immovable presence over Japan. However spirited the defenders may have been, they were contending almost exclusively with American fighter forces, and the B-29s were left to put entire cities to the torch by night. Between poor command and control facilities, crude early warning radar, and the constant inter service rivalry between the Navy and Army Air Forces, the defense of the Home Islands was failing. Despite having nearly two years to prepare for a potential strategic bombing campaign, there was no effective plan for the air defense of the Home Islands. In the final accounting, interceptors brought down a confirmed 74 Superfortresses, which flew some 31,300 sorties.

In the face of a disintegrating effort against an enemy that was only growing more numerous, the Japanese air forces continued their defense, largely without success. The Mustang, Hellcat, and Corsair, continued to roam the skies of Japan. On August 15th, In the last major battle between the air forces of the Japanese and US Navy’s, four Raidens and eight Zeros took off to engage a detachment of F6F Hellcats. Incensed by the declaration of surrender, the airmen of the 302nd ambushed the flight. Outnumbered and weighed down by external fuel and munitions, the Hellcats fought to escape, and in the ensuing dogfight, two Raidens and a Zero were lost for four of the US Navy’s fighters. An ace pilot was made in one Lt. Morio Yutaka, and the flight returned to base, concluding the final combat mission of the Raiden. The 302nd would mutiny in an attempt to continue fighting, but were discouraged when their messengers to other units were rebuffed and their commander fell ill. Divided and disheartened, they returned home.

Flight Characteristics and Pilot’s Remarks

Many Japanese Navy fighter pilots were unsure what to make of the stout, yet, powerful fighter. (lancero99)

The Raiden was fairly unique in that it was viewed very poorly by most Japanese airmen, yet American test pilots gave a fairly glowing account of it. Before all else, it must again be said that the strengths of the aircraft were not impressed upon Japan’s Naval Airmen before they were issued their planes. Its excellent rate of climb and impressive dive characteristics were noted in technical evaluations, but they were not emphasized enough in training. However, throughout its service, it did gain some good marks from Japanese pilots, notably from pilots in the Philippines who engaged American bombers at lower altitudes and found it far superior in this task than the other fighters available to them.

Both Japanese and American pilots were complimentary of the spaciousness of the cockpit. Of note is the large armor glass pane above the instrument panel, combined with the 8mm steel headrest, the Raiden provided considerably more protection than most Japanese fighters. (rods warbirds)

Most Japanese airmen coming to this aircraft did so with experience on the supremely agile, if slow, A6M Zero. The Raiden was practically the antithesis of this aircraft, with their strengths and weaknesses reversed. It thus proved categorically unpopular among Japanese Naval Pilots. The Raiden’s vibration at cruise and the poor build quality of the aircraft did nothing to improve its reputation. Poor visibility over the nose, rear, and the higher landing speed also presented challenges to those familiar with flying the Zero. They did, however, recognize it made for a superior interceptor over the A6M Zero, featuring an impressive rate of climb, and powerful armament. Its vertical maneuverability was also among the highest of all late war Japanese fighters, giving it a number of strengths over its allied opponents that the Zero lacked.

A wartime TAIC calculated performance report claims the Raiden was capable of climbing 4700 feet per minute (23.9 m/s) at its highest for its first supercharger speed at 4000 ft (1220 m), and 4100 feet per minute (20.828 m/s) at its second at 15,000 ft (4572 m). Its top speed was projected at 304 knots at sea level, 321 knots at 6,000 ft, and 369 knots at 17,500 ft. These figures are likely suspect and calculated based on an incomplete model, disagreeing considerably with other claims elsewhere.

A figure of top speed of 330 kts at 6km appears elsewhere in numerous, including Japanese publications, likely with better access to resources on the aircraft. It is also likely that its true performance lies somewhere in the middle. While this top speed isn’t particularly impressive, its maximum climb rate of approximately 4650 feet per second at sea level, was. This is considerably higher than the Mustang’s maximum rate of climb of 3600 feet per minute, when running at 67” manifold pressure and with a bomb rack on each wing, which would have been the case for those over Japan. These figures are likely more in line with its true performance, given that the aircraft was designed to achieve a very high climb rate, rather than the highest speed in level flight. Concurrently, its sustained turn performance was excellent compared to allied fighters, thanks to high power to weight ratio.

A veteran with over a decade of experience, Lt.jg Akamatsu taught the Raiden pilots of the 302nd how to best employ their fighter, ensuring his pilots knew how best to pursue their targets, and how to disentangle from unfavorable engagements. (TooBadAtNamingAccounts)

One of the most notable pilots to use the Raiden in combat was Lt.jg Akamatsu Sadaaki of the 302nd Air Group, who was as far removed from the picture of a Japanese wartime officer as was possible. He received his wings in the Naval Air Force in 1932, was a borderline dysfunctional alcoholic who was prone to insubordination, womanizing, striking those who irritated him, managed to survive the war without major injury, and he was said to have flown combat sorties drunk, among other wild claims. He would claim to have shot down over 200 enemy aircraft when sober, and 300 after a few drinks. He was officially credited with 27 victories. His eccentricities aside, he proved the Raiden was a capable combat aircraft in his role at the 302nd. In one engagement, he showed the excellent energy-fighting capabilities of the Raiden on April 19, 1945 when he and his wing man encountered a flight of five P-51s. With a height advantage, he dove beneath, and crept behind the enemy, shooting one fighter down, then and brought down another in a head-on pass before both sides broke away. His only real complaint was that the aircraft’s radius of action was short, but was otherwise seemingly the only advocate of this troubled aircraft.

A Raiden in American colors alongside a Seafire Mk IX, and an F6F Hellcat. In spite of its roughness, the aircraft was given favorable remarks by American evaluators. (National Archives)

With several airworthy Raidens having been captured in the battle for the Philippines, American evaluators were able to give an alternate perspective on the aircraft. Overall, it earned good remarks. The cockpit was spacious and well ventilated, especially valuable in the tropical climates of the pacific. The plane was judged stable on all axes, with good stall characteristics. Apart from a lack of warning, recovery was easy with no inclination to go into spins. Maneuverability was judged good, especially with the deployable fowler flaps that allowed for tighter turns. Harmony of control was acceptable but less than ideal, as the ailerons were heavy at cruise and became very stiff at 325 mph, the elevators also being noted for being light up to this speed, and with the rudder being judged effective at all speeds.

The engine ran roughly at the RPM’s for cruise, but at combat and takeoff power this was less pronounced. However, this rough running caused vibration and considerable noise, not enough to be considered excessive or uncomfortable, but enough to be noteworthy. The poor workmanship of the engine would make itself known during testing when an oil delivery hose failed during a long flight, causing the engine to seize and force the pilot to make a dead stick landing.

One Allied evaluation pilot, who filed a detailed report on the plane, would claim it to be the best of the Japanese aircraft he’d flown, which notably included the Ki 84. Overall, the aircraft judged well thanks to its good stability, stall characteristics, comfort, good combat related performance, and its combat flaps. Ironically, it was also said to have had good landing characteristics, which suggests much about the different expectations in aircraft handling between American and Japanese airmen.

Construction

Featuring numerous new advancements in aviation, the Raiden would be a remarkable, if flawed, interceptor. (rods warbirds)

The fuselage of the J2M was of a traditional construction, save for the deeper placement of the aircraft’s engine. This resulted in the spindle-like shape of the aircraft’s fuselage,  allowing for the fitment of a larger engine while still retaining a clean aerodynamic shape. It was of a typical duralumin monocoque construction, with 18 structural bulkheads and former sections from the engine to the tail. It was, however, noteworthy for the use of Sumitomo Super Duralumin, which could boast of higher strength than its contemporaries, comparable with post war 7075 grade aluminum alloy, and late war American alloys which had been developed in response to captured Japanese examples.

It was among the few Japanese fighters to incorporate protection for the pilot, though compared to foreign designs it was very lightly armored. This consisted of an armored steel headrest with a thickness of 8mm, and an armored glass screen, 50mm thick, at the front of the cockpit. In service, these plates were occasionally removed to lighten the aircraft.

From the prototype to the production models there were two major fuselage alterations, namely the addition of a canopy which sat higher atop the air frame to improve visibility and resolve optical issues, and the addition of an additional oil cooler for the engine. A more minor, yet essential, alteration was to shift the position of the tail wheel retracting mechanism, as on early models it could press against the elevator control, and render the aircraft uncontrollable.

The wings incorporated laminar flow theories into their design, which gave the aircraft improved dive performance, and provided high drag reduction. They also improved control through high speed ranges by keeping the destabilization of airflow across the wing’s surface, known as compressibility, from occurring up until the aircraft reached higher mach numbers. Each wing had landing gear which deployed outward, driven by an electric motor which also actuated the tail wheel and flaps. Fowler flaps were used to give the aircraft a tighter turning circle at the cost of speed, they could be deployed via a button on the control yoke, and set the flaps at a 16 degree deflection so long as the button was held.

Cooling was originally provided by an airflow, and later engine driven, fan which drew air through a small annular radiator at the nose of the aircraft. This proved to be inadequate due to the small inlet at the nose of the aircraft and the limitations of the engine driven cooling fan, forcing the addition of an under-nose radiator on the J2M2 model. This cooler was also enlarged on the next model, the J2M3, to provide better cooling for the longer, higher power climbs these interceptors would be making.

The plane was powered by various models of the Mitsubishi Kasei, a 42.1 liter, two-row, 14 cylinder radial engine equipped with a Mitsubishi fuel injection system, and a single stage, two speed supercharger. The original was the Kasei 13, MK4C, which operated at a reduced output of 1,420hp, this was done to try and keep issues of vibration to a minimum, but this failed due to issues with the constant speed propeller governor, which drove a three bladed propeller. It was noteworthy for its air driven cooling fan which sat at the front of the engine, and a 50cm extension shaft which was shrouded in an elongated reduction gear housing unit. Technical issues with this engine, and its insufficient output saw it abandoned for the Kasei 23.

The Kasei 23, note the propeller shaft extension and mechanically driven cooling fan. (sagamiharaheikishou)

The Kasei 23, MK4R, reduced the length of the extension shaft to 30cm, incorporated an engine driven cooling fan. Vibration issues were eventually relieved through the use of rubber buffers on the engine mounts and adjusting the propeller balancing mechanism along with replacement of the constant speed unit, which then drove a four bladed Sumitomo metal propeller. Some vibration was still noted in flight, but not enough to significantly affect the combat performance of the aircraft. It likely had an impact on the serviceability of Raiden, but far less so than most of the aircraft being produced by an inexperienced workforce.

This engine was further developed into the Kasei 23a, MK4R-A, with the addition of a methanol-water injection system. The anti-detonation properties thus allowed the engine to run at higher manifold pressures, allowing for an output of 1800hp. It was also equipped with individual exhaust stacks, providing thrust augmentation. This was the primary engine for the J2M2 and J2M3, after the Raiden’s protracted development. The engine had a bore and stroke of 150x170mm. It had a diameter of 134 cm, with a length of 274.32 cm.

At an RPM of 2600 and +450 mmhg over atmospheric pressure, the engine produced 1800 hp at takeoff. It produced 1575 at its first supercharger speed at 1800 m (5905 ft), and 1410 hp at its second speed at 4800 m (15748 ft). It could hold its maximum power setting for 1 minute, and military power, 2500 RPM at +300 mm hg, for 30. Its maximum continuous rating was at 2300 RPM and +150 mm hg of manifold pressure.

Fuel tankage comprised a pair of tanks at the wing roots containing 90 liters of aviation gasoline, along with a fuel tank ahead of the cockpit which initially contained 410 liters, later reduced to 390 liters after plane 3003. A centerline detachable drop tank could also be carried, increasing fuel supply by 250 liters. The oil tank was mounted aft of the engine and had a capacity of 60 liters. The methanol-water tank was sandwiched between the oil and fuselage fuel tank for a capacity of 120 liters. The aircraft was serviced with 92 octane aviation gasoline.

A Raiden carrying the more or less standard armament of four 20 mm Type 99 machine guns. (Japanese-warship)

The initial armament of the J2M2 Raiden comprised a pair of 7.7mm Type 97 machine guns mounted in the engine cowling, and a pair of wing mounted 20mm Type 99 Model 2 machine guns. The Type 99 was designated a machine gun, as compared to other calibers in use by the navy it was quite small and did not warrant being referred to as a “cannon”.

The Type 97 was a derivative of the Vickers class E aircraft machine gun. Each weighed 11.8 kg, was 104 cm in length, was belt fed, and had a rate of fire of 900 rounds per minute. The Type 99 no.1 model 4 20mm machine gun weighed 23 kg, measured 133 cm in length, was belt fed, and fired 520 rounds per minute, supplied with a 210 round belt.

This armament was also to be used for the J2M3 before the cowling machine guns were removed and a second pair of wing mounted 20 mm machine guns were added. These Type 99 no.2 model 4 20mm machine guns were mounted inboard of the initial guns, weighed 34 kg, measured 189 cm in length, were belt fed, and fired at 490 rounds per minute, with a 190 round belt. These featured a longer barrel and had a higher muzzle velocity.

A rare Raiden sporting a heavier 30 mm armament, a considerable upgrade in firepower though one that saw little to no operational use. (japanese-warship)

A very small number of J2M3’s were equipped with a pair of 30 mm Type 5 machine guns in place of the Type 99 no.2’s. These each weighed 70 kg, had a length of 207 cm, fired 500 rounds per minute, and were belt fed.

A very small number of Raidens received an upward firing 20mm mounted behind the cockpit for use against bombers. It was used only with the 302nd air group, and installed at the insistence of its commanding officer, a night fighter pilot who thought it would be useful against heavy bombers. Little has been written of its configuration or use, with the modification being stated to have been very unpopular with pilots who disliked the added weight of the questionable weapon.

A pair of 60 kg general purpose aviation bombs could be carried on outer wing shackles. They were compatible with air to air phosphorous bombs, though this capability was likely never used.

Attempts to produce high altitude series were made, though none produced a combat ready aircraft. The J2M4 possessed a turbosupercharged Kasei 23c engine with a slightly lengthened fuselage to accommodate the turbine, but it proved too unreliable for service. It proved capable of reaching 315 kts at 9.2 km. A second high altitude series was attempted in the J2M5, which took a more modest path in using a Kasei 26a, utilizing a three speed supercharger. It proved a far more reliable means of boosting high altitude performance, allowing it to make 331 kts at 6.8 km. It had a fairly small production run, but the escalating bombing raids against the Japanese mainland made any major modifications to the Raiden unacceptable, as they would have reduced the production output of an already much needed aircraft.

Variants

J2M1: Prototype series, Kasei 13, early windscreen. 3 produced. First aircraft completed March, 1942, flown March 23.

J2M2 Model 11: Kasei 23, new canopy design, air driven cooling fan replaced with engine driven, chin oil cooler added, propeller changed with new governor, numerous other mechanical improvements. Two Type 97 7.7mm guns in cowl, two Type 99 20mm guns in wings. Kasei 23a later retrofitted, vibrations issues reduced. First aircraft completed October 1942, first flown October 13.

J2M3 Model 21: Kasei 23a, oil cooler enlarged. Four Type 99 20mm guns in wings. Most produced type. First aircraft built October 1943.

J2M4 Model 32: Prototype series, Kasei 23c turbosupercharged engine, unreliable. Only 2 produced. First aircraft built August 1944, first flown September 24. Project canceled in February 1945.

J2M5 Model 33: Production series, finished trials May 1944, shelved. Kasei 26a with three speed supercharger. Enlarged cockpit frame to improve rearward visibility. 34 produced. First flown May, 1944.

J2M6 Model 31: Prototype, J2M3 with canopy and cockpit from J2M5. First aircraft built February 1944.

J2M7 Model 23: J2M3 with fuselage modifications to improve rearward visibility. None built.

Production

The Raiden was built at Mitsubishi Airframe Works No. 3 at Nagoya, and later at dispersal facilities and the Naval depot at Kanagawa. Production varied drastically, especially early on when cancellation of the program was being considered, only for it to be brought back when the need for interceptors of any kind became dire. The relationship between the plant and government was deeply strained during wartime, production decisions with long term impacts were judged to have been made too often by post war American evaluators, and the plant officials were disparaging of the government’s involvement in their business. Stress was felt strongest over production orders, where the military changed its mind too often in regards to order sizes and modifications. Where Mitsubishi would have preferred large orders with little modifications between batches, the military vacillated in their procurement.

The main works at Nagoya were a prime target for allied air raids, and the failure to properly disperse production had major effects on the supply of aircraft for the Navy. (National Archives)

As the war continued, more and more conscripted labor was used, and in its last year, a large number of teenage workers. They were not only inexperienced, but were categorized by the plant managers as “inefficient, inept, and indifferent”. To complicate matters, they had friction with the regular plant employees, a factor that was likely also cultural as these conscripts often came from territories outside Japan. Morale at the plant was low.

Nagoya Airframe Works No. 3, and its dispersal facilities produced 493 aircraft, with a further 128 being produced by the Koza Naval Air Arsenal in Kanazawa. Unlike in Germany, dispersal efforts largely failed due to poor long term planning and the USAAF’s ability to track the progress of alternate production sites. Production never ceased, but the quantity and quality of the aircraft that left the production lines was heavily impacted. According to Horikoshi Jiro, the efforts to disperse the factory were conducted too blatantly, and had the effect of dividing up experienced plant personnel and construction crews at a time where they were already spread too thin. The build quality of the J2M was thus fairly dubious during 1944 and 1945, which was well understood by aircrews.

Production Mitsubishi, Nagoya, All Types January February March April May June July August September October November December
1942 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2
1943 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 4 5 16 21 22
1944 17 26 9 22 39 44 34 22 16 20 18 7
1945 17 12 29 16 0 8 7 27
Production Koza, Kanagawa Naval Depot January February March April May June July August September October November December
1944 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 6
1945 13 8 23 15 10 20 22 0

Specifications

J2M3 Raiden Specification
Engine Kasei 23a MK4R
Engine Output 1800 hp
Gross Weight 2861 kg
Empty weight 2191 kg
Maximum Range 968 nmi (calculated)
Maximum speed 330 kts at 6km
Armament 4x 20mm  Type 99 Model 2, no.’s 1&2
Crew 1, Pilot
Length 9.69264 m
Height 3.93192 m
Wingspan 10.78992 m
Wing Area 11.7058 m2

Conclusion

The only fully intact Raiden, at the Planes of Fame museum in Chino, California. (Planes of Fame Air Museum)

Few full-scale production aircraft had the developmental difficulties of the J2M Raiden, and of those that did, few of those ever reached the front line in appreciable numbers. Despite its development running through nearly the entire war, Horikoshi’s troubled plane did eventually find its way into service. Unfortunately it did so without pilots being well informed of the aircraft’s strengths, with most taking a dim view of the aircraft, one which ran roughly and was less maneuverable than the Zeros they traded it for. Yet, in service, the aircraft proved quite capable in combat, and received glowing endorsements from Allied evaluators.

Illustration

J2M3 Model 21. Flown by Akamatsu Saadaki of the 302nd Air Corps. He claimed 2 P-51 Mustangs in this aircraft.
J2M3 Model 21. Flown by Aoki Yoshihiro of the 352nd Air Corps.

 

Credits

Written By Henry H.

Edited By Henry H.

Illustration by Oussama Mohamed “Godzilla”

Sources:

Primary:

Flight Tests on the North American P-51D Airplane, AAF No. 44-1534. Memo Report No. TSCEP5E-1908. 15 June 1945.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd (Mitsubishi Jukogyo KK) Corporation Report No. 1 (Airframes and Engines). United States Strategic Bombing Survey Aircraft Division. 1947.

Army Air Arsenal And Navy Air Depots. Corporation Report No.XIX (Airframes and Engines). United States Strategic Bombing Survey Aircraft Division. 1947.

Japanese Air Weapons and Tactics. Military Analysis Division. 1947.

Japanese Aircraft Performance and Characteristics TAIC Manual No. 1. Technical Air Intelligence Center. 1944.

Secondary:

Price, Alfred. Instruments of Darkness: the History of Electronic Warfare, 1939-1945. 2017.

Overy, Richard. The Air War 1939-1945. 2005.

Francillon R.J. Japanese Aircraft of the Pacific War. 1970.

Goodwin, Mike. Japanese Aero Engines. 2017.

Williams, Anthony G. Flying Guns of World War II. 2003

Izawa, Yasuho; Holmes, Tony. J2M Raiden and N1K1/2 Shiden/Shiden-Kai Aces. 2016.

Peattie, Mark R. Sunburst: The Rise of Japanese Naval Air Power, 1909-1941. 2013.

Horikoshi Jiro. Eagles of Mitsubishi: The Story of the Zero Fighter. 1992.

Editorial staff of Maru Mechanic. Mechanic of World Aircraft, Series no. 4 Raiden/Reppu/Type 100 Reconnaissance. 1993.

Tacitus Publications. Fighter Combat Comparisons No.1 Grumman F6F-5 Hellcat Vs. Mistubishi J2M3 Model 21 Raiden (‘Jack’). 1989.

Samuel J. Cox. H-051-1: The Last Sacrifices. 2020.

Mitsubishi Kasei 23 ‘Ko’, Ha 32 Model 23 ‘Ko’, Radial 14 Engine. Smithsonian Air and Space Museum.

Masatake, Okumiya; Horikoshi Jiro; Caidin Martin. ZERO! The Story of Japan’s Air War in the Pacific 1941-1945. 1956.

 

Fairey Fulmar

UK Union Jack United Kingdom (1940)
Carrier-Based Fighter Number built: 600

In the late 1930s, the British Royal Navy was in desperate need of a modern carrier-based fighter. No existing aircraft in the British inventory could effectively fulfill this role; fortunately, the aircraft manufacturer Fairey was developing a versatile light bomber. Upon closer examination, it became clear that this aircraft could be adapted for carrier operations. The result was the Fairey Fulmar, which entered service in 1940.

With little time or resources on hand as a new World War loomed, the Royal Navy’s  need for a carrier-based fighter was the found in the Fairey Fulmar. (wikimedia)

History

By the late 1930s, Japan was expanding across Asia, and there were increasing signs that a new war in Europe was on the horizon. This prompted nations such as the United Kingdom to invest in new military developments, focusing on new weapons, aircraft, and nascent technological fields which might yield decisive advantages. The Royal Air Force (RAF) saw a surge of new aircraft designs, some of which would prove to be war-winning weapons, such as the Spitfire and Hurricane fighters.

In contrast, the British Royal Navy struggled to find a suitable fighter aircraft to protect its ships. Few existing designs met the requirements, and while some older designs still had some use left in them, like the venerable Gloster Gladiator, the need for modern fighters was becoming apparent. The main airborne threats were maritime patrol aircraft that could reveal the position of the Royal Navy’s fleets, but with rapid advancements in aviation happening year over year, new dangers were soon to emerge.

Ruggedness, endurance, and advanced navigational equipment were key aspects of carrier-based fighters, but for a short-legged, landbased day fighter, these design goals were secondary at best. As a result, the Royal Navy’s requirements for a new fighter prioritized long-range radio navigation equipment and a multi-crew design. While these additions reduced the aircraft’s speed, the trade-off was considered necessary for the sake of improved coordination and operational effectiveness. In addition, the new fighter needed to carry enough fuel for a flight of at least three hours.

Developing an entirely new design was likely to take years, and given the rising tensions in Europe, the Navy wanted a solution as soon as possible. Fortunately for them, the RAF had been experimenting with a high-speed light bomber concept. In response, several companies, including Fairey Aviation and Hawker Aircraft, submitted proposals, the Fairey P.4/34 and the Hawker Henley.

However, before either of these designs reached flight testing, the RAF abandoned the fast bomber concept altogether. The Navy, on the other hand, remained highly interested in a potential fighter based on the designs. Both aircraft demonstrated impressive speed and an endurance of over four hours, making them strong candidates for the naval fighter role the navy was seeking.

To further improve their options, a third aircraft, the Phillips and Powis M.9 Kestrel, was included in the evaluation as a private venture. However, as it was initially intended as a trainer, it lacked the long-range capabilities required for naval operations and was quickly rejected.

In January 1938, after meeting with representatives from the Air Ministry, it was suggested that the Navy select the Fairey entrant as the winner. This recommendation was not based primarily on overall performance, but rather on Hawker’s already overloaded production schedule. The company was heavily engaged in manufacturing the much-needed Hurricane fighter and could not afford to divert time and resources to another project.

After analyzing its limited options, the Navy agreed to the proposal but issued a series of requirements for the new fighter. Among these were an endurance of six hours at a speed of 220 km/h (138 mph) and three hours at 427 km/h (265 mph), all at an altitude of over 3,000 meters (10,000 feet). The aircraft’s armament was to consist of at least eight 7.62 mm (0.303 in) Browning machine guns. Navy officials determined that a rear-mounted machine gun would not be necessary. While not specifically intended for attacking enemy ships, the aircraft was to be capable of carrying two 113 kg (250 lb) bombs if needed.

A more significant requirement was that the fighter should be adaptable for floatplane operations, with the ability to be equipped with floats in the field by a four-man crew in a relatively short time. Additionally, the aircraft had to be built with a sufficiently strong structure to allow for carrier landings and catapult launches.

In February, representatives from the RAF and the Navy met to discuss the proposal further and refine the specifications. During these discussions, several additional modifications were agreed upon, including raising the canopy to improve visibility during landings, and the rear observer/navigator’s compartment was to be equipped with the necessary navigational instruments. If these requirements were met, production was estimated to begin in September 1939, with a planned output of 8 aircraft per month. The new fighter was designated as Fairey Fulmar.

In March 1938, Fairey was informed of the Navy’s request for a new fighter aircraft. After examining the details, Fairey’s engineers began assessing whether the necessary modifications could be made without compromising the aircraft’s performance. By May, they informed Navy officials that their P.4/34 prototype could be adapted for the role. Following this, Fairey received a production order for 127 aircraft. Interestingly, the contract did not include the construction of an additional P.4/34 prototype for testing.

However, the project came to a halt that same month. The main issue was that Fairey was already overwhelmed with other commitments. The P.4/34’s designer, Marcel J. O. Lobelle, was instead assigned to work on the Fairey Barracuda and Albacore torpedo bombers. With his focus diverted, he was unable to dedicate time to yet another project. Despite this setback, work on the fighter continued, albeit at a slow pace.

The Munich Crisis of September 1938, in which Britain and France negotiated the fate of Czechoslovakia with Germany, further heightened tensions in Europe. With the possibility of war increasing, the order for the new fighter was expanded to 250 aircraft. However, given the existing delays, Fairey informed Navy officials that production could not commence before March 1940, seven months later than originally intended. To compensate for lost time, the monthly production was to be increased to 25 aircraft and carried out at the newly constructed Stockport factory.

First Production Aircraft

During the spring of 1939, the P.4/34 prototype was modified and tested as a potential new fighter. Following its success, two more pre-production aircraft were completed in late 1939. The first of these underwent flight testing in January 1940, while the second was not tested until May of that year. The delay occurred because the designers wanted to evaluate the installation of the Rolls-Royce RM3M engine. However, despite this test, the production aircraft that were to be gradually introduced were to be powered by the Merlin VIII engine instead.

One of the five pre-production aircraft was used as a test prototype. (D. Brown Fairey Fulmar Mks I and II Aircraft Profile 254)

Testing of the first aircraft revealed that its performance was below expectations. It achieved a maximum speed of 410 km/h (255 mph), which was lower than intended, and its climb rate was also deemed insufficient. More importantly, its operational endurance was an hour below the originally promised six hours. The primary issue was that once armament and additional equipment were installed, the aircraft’s weight increased considerably, which negatively impacted its overall performance.

On the 6th of April 1940, the first production aircraft underwent flight testing at the Aeroplane & Armament Experimental Establishment in Boscombe Down, Wiltshire. The aircraft was described as pleasant to fly and highly responsive. However, much like the prototype, its performance was subpar compared to modern land-based fighters.

Further testing was conducted by No. 770 Squadron, a trial unit stationed at Lee-on-Solent Naval Air Station. The aircraft arrived at its unit on May 10, 1940—the same day Germany launched its invasion of Western Europe. There, it was used for takeoff and landing trials, both on solid ground and on a wooden dummy flight deck designed to simulate aircraft carrier runways.

In early June 1940, the aircraft underwent flight tests aboard the newly built HMS Illustrious. The Fairey Fulmar proved easy to land, thanks to its excellent forward visibility and responsive controls. However, during takeoff, pilots noticed a tendency for the aircraft to veer to the left.

Despite its mediocre capabilities, and with no viable alternative available, the Fairey Fulmar was put into production. Manufacturing began in April 1940, and between April and December of that year, approximately 159 aircraft of this type were built.

Despite the urgent need for such fighters, production was delayed. When it finally began, it began at a slow pace, meaning the aircraft were never available in significant numbers during the war. (https://hushkit.net/2020/03/24/fairey-fulmar-how-an-absurd-lumbering-thing-became-britains-top-scoring-naval-fighter/)

Improved Mk. II Model

As Fulmar production was underway, Fairey proposed an improved variant. Essentially, it was the same aircraft but powered by a 1,260 hp Merlin 30 engine. Additionally, it was estimated that the new model could have its weight reduced by approximately 160 kg (350 lb). Once approval was granted, Fairey modified one of its already-built Fulmar aircraft to create the prototype for the new version, designated as the Fulmar II (Mk. II). The prototype modification was completed by the end of 1940, and flight testing began after nearly a month. The conversion proved successful and straightforward, requiring no major retooling of the production process. As a result, manufacturing soon transitioned to the new Fulmar II. However, despite the more powerful engine, its overall performance saw only marginal improvement. The aircraft built using older airframes, but fitted with the new engine, were designated as Fulmar I/II. By February 1943, a total of 600 aircraft of both variants had been produced.

Night Fighter Role

When the war in Europe began, Britain was among the many countries that lacked a dedicated night fighter. By 1940, the situation had not improved significantly. In particular, night raids by the Italian Air Force inflicted damage on several British ships stationed in the Mediterranean. The Royal Navy’s Fulmar fighter was ill-equipped to counter these nighttime attacks, and naval officials requested Air Interception Radar Mk. VI sets from the RAF. However, the experiment proved disappointing, as the radar performed poorly at the low altitudes where anti-ship attacks were conducted.

From 1942 onward, the older Mark IV radar system replaced the Mk. VI. This upgrade involved installing three antenna masts on the wings and in front of the aircraft. Unfortunately, this installation further reduced the Fulmar’s already slow speed by an additional 32 km/h (20 mph). Due to these challenges, none of the 100 modified aircraft were deployed to the front lines until February 1944, and it remains doubtful whether they ever saw combat.

While the Fulmar failed in its night fighter role, approximately 50 aircraft were repurposed as night-fighter trainers, making up half of the originally modified night-fighter fleet.

Long-Range Reconnaissance Role

Beginning in April 1942, some Fulmars were tested with lightweight H/F W/T radio sets. The installation proved successful, leading to further modifications for use as long-range reconnaissance aircraft equipped with improved radio equipment. These aircraft were primarily deployed for extended patrols over the Indian Ocean.

In Combat

Northern Europe

As the first Fairey Fulmars entered service in 1940, Europe was already engulfed in war. The first operational unit to receive the aircraft was No. 806 Squadron. Initially, Fulmars operated from airfields in the UK, from which they were deployed to support the defense of Norway, and later played a role in the evacuation of Allied forces from Dunkirk. Their first assigned aircraft carrier deployment was aboard the newly commissioned Illustrious, beginning in August 1940.

Later in 1941, Fulmars were used to patrol, and escort convoys bound for the Soviet Union in the North Sea. While engagements with enemy fighters were rare, one notable encounter took place in late July 1941. During this engagement, a group of Fulmars intercepted German aircraft, resulting in the destruction of two Bf 109s and one Me 110. However, the Fulmars suffered losses as well, with two aircraft being shot down in the process.

Additional units were formed as more aircraft became available. Interestingly, some Fulmars from No. 804 Squadron were assigned to operate from Fighter Catapult Ships, escorting Atlantic convoys. These were actually modified merchant ships equipped with catapult rams. Once the fighter was launched, the pilot was to fly it until he ran out of fuel. After that, the pilot would use his parachute or ditch the aircraft in the path of a ship that could recover him.

While they were intended to function as carrier-based fighters, their early operational life saw them deployed from coastal airfields in the UK. (https://www.reddit.com/r/WeirdWings/comments/c2ivcq/fairey_fulmar/)

The last recorded sortie from an aircraft carrier occurred on the 8th of February 1945. On that day, a Fulmar night fighter was dispatched to intercept an enemy aircraft approaching a convoy destined for the Soviet Union. However, en route to its target, the Fulmar’s radar equipment malfunctioned, forcing the pilot to return to the carrier. During landing, the aircraft missed the arrestor wire and instead crashed into the safety barrier.

Mediterranean Theater of War 

As production increased, additional units were formed. Such as No. 804 Squadron, which was assigned to operate Fulmars from merchant ships fitted with catapults, escorting Atlantic convoys. These vessels would launch the aircraft when an enemy target was identified. Between June and September 1940, this tactic saw limited use, with the Fulmars managing only to inflict minor damage on a German Fw 200 bomber. The Fulmars also participated in the hunt for the German Bismarck battleship but played a minor reconnaissance role.

Their combat service was primarily seen in the Mediterranean, and in September 1940, HMS Illustrious was deployed to that theater of war. At the time, the British Navy operating there lacked any form of fighter support. This role was then fulfilled by the 18 aircraft of No. 806 Squadron.

For the remainder of the year, the squadron was mainly tasked with targeting Italian reconnaissance aircraft and enemy bombers. Despite their limited numbers, they managed to shoot down 26 Italian aircraft by the end of 1940. This success was achieved by effectively coordinating their operations with Illustrious‘ radar system.

However, the situation changed drastically in 1941 when the German Luftwaffe arrived in greater numbers. Illustrious was heavily damaged, forcing No. 806 Squadron to relocate—first to Malta and then to Crete in February 1941. There, they were attached to another carrier, Formidable, and effectively merged with No. 803 Squadron.

The squadron continued operations from Formidable until May 1941, when the carrier was severely damaged by German attacks. By that time, the Fulmars had managed to shoot down at least 56 enemy aircraft, but these successes came at a cost—more than half of their already limited numbers were lost.

In April 1941, the aircraft carrier Ark Royal was tasked with protecting Gibraltar, supported by No. 807 and No. 808 Squadrons. These squadrons remained active until August 1941, when Ark Royal was sunk. Following its loss, No. 808 Squadron was disbanded, while No. 807 Squadron continued operating in the area. They were primarily assigned to patrol missions, occasionally engaging German submarines. In June, while conducting operations around Malta, they managed to shoot down five enemy aircraft but suffered the loss of three of their own. Afterward, they were redeployed to the United Kingdom.

During August 1942, No. 807 Squadron played a role in protecting a supply convoy to Malta. The British forces were supported by 18 Fulmars from No. 809 and No. 884 Squadrons. Between the 11th to 12th of August, intense battles with Axis fighters took place. The Fulmars successfully shot down at least two enemy aircraft but lost three of their own in the process.

On a few occasions, they also engaged Vichy French aircraft near Syria. In one such encounter, a group of Fulmars clashed with French D.520 fighters. Although they failed to bring down any of the French aircraft, the British lost three of their own.

The Fairey Fulmar was predominantly employed in the Mediterranean against Axis maritime patrol aircraft. (https://www.armouredcarriers.com/fairey-fulmar-models)

Deployment to China Bay

In February 1942, a small contingent of Fairey Fulmar aircraft was dispatched to China Bay to support the Royal Air Force’s General Reconnaissance No. 273 Squadron. The Fulmar equipped two squadrons, No. 803 and No. 806. No. 803 Squadron suffered heavy losses in April 1942 when four of its six aircraft were shot down during an engagement with Japanese fighters. However, the squadron managed to achieve one air victory during the battle.

On April 9, the Fulmars saw action again when they engaged Japanese bombers attacking the British aircraft carrier HMS Hermes. Despite being at a disadvantage, they successfully shot down three enemy bombers but lost two of their own aircraft in the process.

End of Service

By 1943, most Fulmar aircraft that had been deployed as day fighters were withdrawn from frontline service. The remaining aircraft were repurposed for training or used as second-line night fighters for the remainder of the war. As the war in Europe neared its end, nearly all Fulmars were replaced by the improved Fairey Firefly. In total, approximately 40 Fulmars were lost in combat by the war’s conclusion.

Technical characteristics

The Fulmar was a single-engine, all-metal carrier-based fighter. Its monocoque fuselage was constructed using metal panels placed over a tubular framework. A similar design approach was employed for the rest of the aircraft, including the wings and tail assembly.

Since the aircraft was intended to operate from smaller aircraft carriers, where space was limited, its wings needed to be foldable to maximize available room. As a result, the inner section of the wings was fixed to the fuselage, while the outer sections were designed to fold back efficiently against the sides of the aircraft. The tail assembly followed a more conventional design, featuring two horizontal stabilizers and a single vertical stabilizer.

Since it was designed to operate from an aircraft carrier, where space was limited, its wings were modified to fold. (https://www.armouredcarriers.com/fairey-fulmar-models)
Its landing gear consisted of two main wheels that retracted inward into the fuselage, along with a small fixed tail wheel. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairey_Fulmar)

The first prototype developed from the P.4/34 was powered by a 1,030 hp Rolls-Royce Merlin II V-12 engine. It was later replaced with a slightly more powerful Merlin VIII engine, producing 1,080 hp. With this upgrade, the aircraft achieved a maximum diving speed of 724 km/h (450 mph) and a cruising speed of 398 km/h (247 mph). The final improved variant was instead equipped with a Merlin 30 engine, delivering 1,300 hp. This modification increased the cruising speed to 417 km/h (259 mph).

Initially powered by a 1,030 hp engine, it was soon replaced with a later variant that produced 1,300 hp. While this upgrade didn’t significantly increase its maximum speed, it was certainly a welcome improvement in its rate of climb and sustained turn rate. (https://www.armouredcarriers.com/fairey-fulmar-models)

Beneath the fuselage, there were sets of catapult spools along with an arrestor hook. These components were essential for launching the aircraft from a carrier. The arrestor hook featured a V-shaped design and was secured in place by a snap lock. The pilot could release it when needed, and when not in use, only a small portion of the hook remained exposed.

The cockpit consisted of a position for the pilot and a rear, extended radio operator/observer cabin. To provide the best forward visibility, the pilot’s canopy was slightly elevated. The remaining crew compartment was fully glazed to ensure the best possible view of the surroundings. Given the distance between them, the crew communicated using a speaking tube or, when necessary, a sidetone. However, due to engine noise, the latter method was not always the most effective.

The Fulmar featured a raised pilot’s canopy, providing an excellent forward view. Additionally, its rear crew compartment was fairly long and enclosed by a glazed canopy, offering a good all-around view. (https://hushkit.net/2020/03/24/fairey-fulmar-how-an-absurd-lumbering-thing-became-britains-top-scoring-naval-fighter/)

The armament of this aircraft consisted of eight 7.62 mm machine guns mounted in the wings. Each gun was initially supplied with 750 rounds of ammunition, which was later increased to 1,000. While eight machine guns may sound formidable, in practice, they lacked the firepower needed to inflict serious damage on larger targets, given their relatively small caliber.

The ground crew in the process of loading each gun with 750-round belts. Later, this was increased to 1,000 rounds per machine gun. (https://www.destinationsjourney.com/historical-military-photographs/fairey-fulmar/)

For example, the British recorded an incident in which three Fulmar fighters engaged a single Blohm & Voss BV 138, a long-range maritime reconnaissance aircraft. Despite firing nearly 18,000 rounds at it, the German aircraft suffered no significant damage and managed to escape.

To address this issue, the British considered equipping the Fulmar with heavier 12.7 mm (0.5 in) machine guns. While the installation proved feasible, a shortage of these weapons meant that very few aircraft were ever fitted with them. Around 100 units were slated for modification to carry four of these heavy machine guns, but only a small number actually received the upgrade.

Despite having enough space, no attempt was made to mount a rear-positioned machine gun, despite the crew’s insistence on doing so. Instead, the crew improvised with whatever defensive weapons they could find. Some used Thompson submachine guns, while others relied on signal pistols. The most unusual weapon employed for self-defense was a bundle of standard-issue toilet paper, secured with an elastic band. When thrown out of the aircraft, the band would snap, creating an explosion of paper that, on rare occasions, helped distract or deter enemy pursuers.

The Fulmar was originally designed to carry a bomb load consisting of either two 45 kg or 113 kg (100-250 lbs) bombs. However, this was never actually implemented, as no bomb racks were installed to accommodate such a load. On rare occasions, small 9 to 18 kg (20-40 lbs) bombs were carried to engage enemy anti-aircraft batteries during support missions.

Production 

Production of this aircraft began in May 1940 and ended in February 1943. During that time, 250 units of the Mk. I variant was built, followed by 350 of the later Mk. II variant. In total, approximately 600 aircraft of this type were produced during the war.

Production Versions

  • Fairey Fulmar Mk.I– First production variant
  • Fairey Fulmar Mk.II– Second production variant equipped with a Merlin 30 engine
  • Night Fighter/trainer– Modified to act as a night fighter, supplied with radio equipment. In total 100 were converted to this role of which half were reused as night fighter trainers
  • Long-Range Reconnaissance – Equipped with long-range radio equipment

Surviving Aircraft

Only one of the approximately 600 aircraft of this type has survived to this day. This surviving example is actually the first prototype, which was later used for civilian purposes after the war. Today, it is on display at the Fleet Air Arm Museum in Yeovilton.

The only surviving Fairey Fulmar  can be seen at the Fleet Air Arm Museum in Yeovilton. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairey_Fulmar)

Conclusion 

The Fairey Fulmar was an attempt to adapt an existing aircraft design into a fighter type that was in high demand by the British Royal Navy. While it met most of the required specifications, it was too slow and heavy to compete effectively against faster, purpose-built fighters. Its

armament, despite featuring multiple machine guns, was also still somewhat underpowered. However, this did not prevent the Fulmar from achieving remarkable success for a relatively large fighter. Despite its small production numbers, it proved effective against Italian aircraft and, on occasion, even German fighters. By 1943, however, it was becoming obsolete, and by the end of the war, all remaining Fulmars had been retired from service. Nonetheless, it paved the way for later, more advanced naval aircraft.

Fairey Fulmar MK.I  Specifications

Wingspans 14.14 m /  46  ft 4 in
Length 13.42 m /  40 ft 2 in
Height 4.27 m / 14 ft
Wing Area 31.8 m² / 342 ft²
Engine 1.080 hp Merilin VIII V-12 piston engine
Empty Weight 3,955 kg / 8,720 lbs
Maximum Takeoff Weight 4,853 kg / 10,700  lbs
Maximum Speed km/h /450  mph
Cruising speed 398 km/h / 247 mph
Maximum Service Ceiling m / 16,000 ft
Crew One pilot, one observer/navigator
Armament
  • Eight 7.62 mm Browning machine guns

Illustration

Credits

Source:

  • D. Brown (1973) Fairey Fulmar Mks I and II Aircraft Profile 254, Profile Publication
  • D. Nešić (2008) Naoružanje Drugog Svetskog Rata Velika Britanija, Vojnoizdavački zavod
  • D. Monday (2007) British Aircraft of World War Two, Chancellor Press
  • F. Crosby (2006) The Complete Guide to Fighters and Bombers Of The World, Hermes Hause
  • https://www.armouredcarriers.com/fairey-fulmar-models

 

 

Fw 189A

Nazi flag Nazi Germany (1940)

Type: Reconnaissance aircraft

Number built: 864

In the late 1930s, the Luftwaffe received substantial resources which allowed for the development of many new series of aircraft. While the Luftwaffe would take on numerous new roles in the new modern military, reconnaissance of enemy territory would remain a crucial aspect of their operations. This reconnaissance work involved identifying weak points and reporting any enemy activity which could prove threatening to the situation on the ground, or presented an opportune target for the air force. The primary responsibility for these tasks fell to light, tactical reconnaissance aircraft. Initially, the Hs 126 was chosen for this role, early combat experience revealed the need for a modern replacement. This led to the development, and introduction, of the well-known twin-engine Fw 189, designed by Kurt Tank.

Fw 189A was Germany’s first modern tactical reconnaissance aircraft. Source: www.luftwaffephotos.com

History

Following the rise of the Nazi party in Germany, significant investments were made in both the Army and the Airforce. The latter, in particular, experienced rapid expansion, through the introduction of a series of new aircraft designed to fulfill various roles. This was no easy task for the Germans, as following the end of the First World War, they were prohibited from developing new aircraft. As a result, they essentially had to start from scratch. For short reconnaissance flights, the Hs 126 was selected. Despite its outdated appearance, this high-wing parasol aircraft proved to be well-suited for the role. However, it was not without flaws.

As production began, the first aircraft of this type was field-tested during the Spanish Civil War. While it performed excellently in its intended role, two major issues were identified. First, the rear gunner also served as the observer, requiring him to switch between these roles depending on the combat situation. The gunner/observer’s primary responsibility was to act as a vigilant lookout, constantly scanning for potential threats while simultaneously surveying the battlefield. This dual role required sharp focus and the ability to quickly assess and respond to emerging dangers, and naturally proved challenging. Second, the aircraft’s low speed, while beneficial for reconnaissance, made it vulnerable to enemy fighters. Essentially, a third crew member was needed, along with an increase in speed, to address these shortcomings.

The Hs 126 was chosen as the Luftwaffe’s first operational tactical reconissance aircraft. Source: en.wikipedia.org

The initial deployment of the Hs 126 in Spain quickly demonstrated to the Germans that the aircraft would soon become obsolete. In response, the Reichsluftfahrtministerium, or German Air Ministry, issued a request for a potential replacement in February 1937. The requirements were straightforward: the new aircraft needed to accommodate a crew of three, provide excellent all-around visibility, achieve a higher maximum speed, and carry an improved defensive armament. Additionally, the RLM decided to include a bomb rack capable of carrying at least 200 kg, reasoning that it would be advantageous to drop bombs during reconnaissance missions.

Three companies reached the final stage of this competition: Arado with the Ar 198, Focke-Wulf with the Fw 189, and Blohm & Voss with the BV 141. Among these, only the Ar 198 had a conventional design by the standards of the time. The Fw 189 featured a central glazed nacelle flanked by two tail boom-mounted engines. The BV 141, however, stood out with its highly unconventional asymmetrical design.

The Arado entry to this competition, the Ar 198. Source: en.wikipedia.org
Blohm & Voss’ asymmetrical BV 141. Despite its unusual design, the aircraft performed surprisingly well, but did not enter mass production. Source: en.wikipedia.org

The Focke-Wulf design team, led by renowned German aircraft designer Kurt Tank, and supported by E. Kosel conceived a twin-boom aircraft powered by two engines. The central section featured a large, fully enclosed, and heavily glazed fuselage. They also proposed that the aircraft could be adapted for various roles by simply using different fuselage sections. The paper proposal and calculations were completed quickly and presented to the RLM in February 1937. Although the RLM officials were initially uncertain about the Focke-Wulf design, they eventually placed an order for the construction of three prototypes. Interestingly, when the request for a potential replacement for the Henschel Hs 126 was issued, there was no specification that the aircraft had to be powered by a single engine.

Work on the first prototype, designated Fw 189V1 (D-OPVN), began in April 1937. This aircraft was powered by two 430-horsepower Argus As 410 engines. By 1938, the prototype was ready and underwent flight testing by Kurt Tank himself in July of that year. The prototype demonstrated excellent performance and had no major issues.

The first prototype, Fw 189V-1. Source: en.wikipedia.org

The second prototype, designated D-OVHD, was flight-tested in August 1938. It was used to test the installation of armaments, including machine guns and bombs. Two 7.92 mm MG 17 machine guns were mounted inside the wings, one (or possibly three, depending on the source) machine gun was installed in the aircraft’s nose, one in the dorsal position, and another in the cone-shaped turret at the rear of the fuselage. Four bomb racks were also added under each wing, each capable of carrying up to 50 kg of bombs. If necessary, the aircraft could be equipped with chemical containers filled with either poison gas or smoke.

A third prototype, designated D-ORMH, followed and was flight-tested in September 1938. This variant was essentially a direct copy of the previous two but without armament. It was primarily used for testing the installation of Argus automatic variable-pitch propellers.

All three prototypes demonstrated excellent overall performance, while their competitors were less fortunate. The Ar 198 was quickly eliminated from consideration due to its poor performance, with only one prototype ever built. RLM officials were uncertain about the next steps, as both the Fw 189 and BV 141 were unconventional designs that were considered unproven. It is not far-fetched to suggest that the RLM had concerns about whether the BV 141 could even be flown reliably in field conditions, leading them to favor the Fw 189 instead. As a result, Focke-Wulf received a production order for four additional prototypes.

Anticipating a major production order, the fourth prototype (D-OCHO) was designated as the basis for the first production variant, named the Fw 189A-0. This variant was powered by two more powerful Argus As410A-1 engines, each producing 465 horsepower. The armament was reduced to just two machine guns.

While Focke-Wulf was making plans for the potential production of the first Fw 189A-0 aircraft, the company’s officials were disappointed and shocked when the RLM informed them that the Hs 126 would not be replaced by the new Fw 189. The Luftwaffe had changed its mind, deciding that the Hs 126 did not, in fact, need to be replaced.

Finally, into the production

Despite its potential, Focke-Wulf could do little to advance the design at the time given the news from the Luftwaffe. Not wanting to waste a promising project, Kurt Tank and his team continued working on it at a slow pace, and at low cost. However, following the successful conclusion of the campaign in France in June 1940, Luftwaffe officials reassessed their opinion on the Hs 126. It became clear that this aircraft was obsolescent in its intended role, and an urgent replacement was needed. The only available aircraft that could potentially fill this role in a short time was the Fw 189.

As a result, Focke-Wulf received its first production order for 10 Fw 189A-0 models in the summer of 1940. The company was also instructed to proceed with the development of the A-1 variant, which was to enter production as soon as possible. However, Focke-Wulf was already heavily involved in the development and production of the new Fw 190 fighter, making it difficult to meet the demands for the Fw 189.

To expedite production, an aircraft manufacturer in Prague was contacted to assist with manufacturing. Even this was not sufficient, so Focke-Wulf moved the production of the Fw 189 to France, utilizing several captured aircraft manufacturing facilities. The Focke-Wulf factories in Bremen and the Aero factories in Prague ceased Fw 189 production in late 1942 and 1943, respectively. Production continued in the French factories until January 1944, when it was finally halted.

The production by years was as follows.

Year of Production Production numbers 
1939 6
1940 38
1941 250
1942 327
1943 226
1944 17
In total  864

 

Main Production Variants 

The A-series was based on the V4 prototype. Unlike the prototype series, it did not include the nose-mounted machine guns. Instead, its main armament consisted of two machine guns mounted in the front wing roots, with an additional one or two located at the rear. If needed, a bomb rack could be installed. Given the aircraft’s specific reconnaissance roles, it could be equipped with various types of cameras. The A-1 model was essentially a direct copy of the fourth prototype, with slight modifications made to the engine cowling to enhance its aerodynamic profile.

The V4 prototype served as the base for the Fw 189 A-0 series. Source: www.warbirdphotographs.com
Early produced Fw 189A-1 aircraft. Source: Pinterest

At least 30 Fw 189A-1 aircraft were modified for use as night interceptors for use against slow, low flying biplanes on the Eastern Front. To fulfill this role, they were equipped with a FuG 212 C-1 aerial interception radar, distinguished by its forward antenna. Additionally, a fixed MG 151 cannon, either 1.5 cm or 2 cm in caliber, was installed in the rear, angled upward to target enemy aircraft from below.

One of the 309 Fw 189A was modified to be used as a night interceptor. They can be easily identified by the front-mounted antenna and the rear MG 151 cannon. Source: www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org

Combat experience quickly revealed that the Fw 189 needed a stronger defensive armament. In response, the Fw 189V9 prototype was tested with the installation of two twin 7.92 mm MG81Z (Z stands for Zwilling – twin) mounts. As these proved reliable, they were adopted for the A-2 variant, which entered production around mid-1941.

Shortly after its introduction into service, it became evident that a dual-control training variant was necessary to properly train pilots. Since the B variant did not enter mass production, a solution was required. The most cost-effective option was to modify an existing Fw 189A with dual controls. This led to the creation of a small production series of training aircraft, designated as the A-3. Some of the older aircraft from the A-0 and A-1 series, as well as prototypes, were repurposed for this variant.

The A-4 was designed as a light ground-attack variant. It was armed with two forward-mounted 20 mm cannons and two MG 17 machine guns. Additionally, armor was added to protect vital components such as the fuel tanks, engines, and central fuselage. An unknown number of these variants were produced beginning in late 1942.

A few aircraft adapted for the African theater of war were equipped with dust filters and designated as the Fw 189A-1 Trop.

Nicknames

Interestingly, Kurt Tank himself nicknamed this aircraft Eule (Eng. Owl). Allegedly, the inspiration for this name came from the large, owl-like shape of the cockpit. The RLM media referred to it as Das Fliegende Auge (Eng. The Flying Eye), while those who operated it on the front lines called it Uhu (Eng. Eagle Owl).

In Combat

During 1940, the first produced Fw 189 aircraft were allocated to various Luftwaffe experimental and training units. Their purpose was to test and evaluate the new Fw 189’s performance. For example, the Lehrgeschwader 2 (Eng. Training Squadron) was supplied with five Fw 189A-0 aircraft, which were flight-tested against the Hs 126. After a series of evaluation flights, the Fw 189 was declared superior in all aspects. This conclusion was a key reason why Luftwaffe officials decided to adopt the Fw 189.

Due to the slow pace of production, when the war with the Soviet Union broke out in June 1941, only about 250 Fw 189s were available for service. This number was barely enough to outfit all units, so the Hs 126 had to remain in use.

By 1942, the Fw 189 began gradually replacing the Hs 126 as the main German tactical reconnaissance aircraft. According to German records from September 1942, out of 317 short-range reconnaissance aircraft, 174 were Fw 189A-1 and A-2 models.

Their service on the Eastern Front demonstrated that these aircraft, despite their seemingly fragile appearance, were quite robust and capable of withstanding heavy damage. For example, on the 19th  May  1942, a lone Fw 189 was attacked by Soviet fighters near the Taman Peninsula. The left engine of the Fw 189 sustained such severe damage that it fell off. Assuming the aircraft was doomed, the Soviet fighters broke off the attack. However, the pilot did not give up and managed to fly the damaged Fw 189 back to German lines, where he executed an emergency landing. The aircraft suffered additional damage during the crash landing, yet it was eventually repaired and returned to service. Despite their durability, several Fw 189s were lost, along with other equipment, during the encirclement of German forces at Stalingrad. In one unusual incident, a Soviet fighter pilot, after running out of ammunition, rammed a Fw 189 near Stalingrad, successfully severing its tail.

By 1943, the Soviet Union’s increased fighter production made short-range operations too dangerous even for the Fw 189. Reconnaissance missions became nearly impossible without a fighter escort. After 1943, the Fw 189 was primarily employed for ground attack operations against Soviet Partisan positions, achieving notable success. However, with the Soviet fighter force continually growing, the days of the Fw 189 were numbered. By 1944, it was rarely used in its original reconnaissance role and often became a priority target for Soviet fighters once spotted. Despite this, the aircraft remained effective in some areas, such as Finland, where it continued to be used until September 1944.

The Fw 189 was primarily operated on the Eastern Front, including Finland. The only other front where it saw limited use was in North Africa. A small number of night interceptor variants, some 30, were assigned to two units, Nachtjagdgeschwader 5 and 100 (NJG, or Night Fighter Squadron), and served late into the war. Tasked specifically with countering Soviet Po-2 biplanes that harassed German railroad lines, NJG 100 earned the nickname Eisenbahn-Nachtjagd (Eng. Railway Night Hunt). The Fw189 performed excellently in this role, bringing down many Soviet night bombers in the process.

Beyond its original role, the Fw 189 also saw service as a light bomber and VIP staff transport. For example, the A-1 variant was used as a personal transport for Field Marshal Albert Kesselring. By late 1944, most of the surviving Fw 189 aircraft were relegated to training duties.

Despite their modest numbers, the Fw 189 would see extensive use on the Eastern Front. Source: www.asisbiz.com
Near the end of the war, the few surviving Fw 189 were used as training aircraft, easily identified by the large painted number on their tails. Source:. G. Punka Focke-Wulf Fw 189 in Action

Failed Proposals 

Although the Luftwaffe initially did not adopt the A variant, they showed an interest for the crew training variant designated as the Fw 189B. This version featured a less-glazed fuselage and dual control units. However, only a small number of these variants were produced.

The Fw 189B variant. Source: /www.warbirdsresourcegroup.or

The first year of the war revealed that the Germans lacked a dedicated armored close support aircraft. In response, Focke-Wulf proposed the Fw 189C as a potential solution. This variant featured a small, cramped, but well-protected cockpit, replacing the previous large fuselage. However, due to poor visibility and handling issues, it was not adopted for service.

The Fw 189D was proposed for naval use and was equipped with twin floats. It was essentially based on the Fw 189B variant, but no further developments materialized.

Focke-Wulf also experimented with various engines. The Fw 189E was tested with the French GR14M 700 hp engine. Unfortunately, the prototype was lost in an accident while being transported from France to Germany in 1943. The Fw 189F, based on the A-2 variant, was powered by the As 411MA-1 600 hp engine and used to test electrically powered landing gear. Although the tests were successful, only 17 units were built in 1944 before the production of the Fw 189 was discontinued.

The Fw 189F-2 was an improved version with enhanced armor protection, but it did not progress beyond the proposal stage. The last proposed variant, the Fw 189G, was intended to be powered by As 402 950 hp engines, but it also failed to materialize.

Other operators 

During the later stages of the war, the Hungarians received over 28 Fw 189 aircraft. Despite the relatively small number of planes, these were used extensively by Hungarian forces. The Slovakians also received 14 Fw 189A-1s between 1942 and 1943, which were employed in the Crimea. Some surviving aircraft were even used against the Germans during the failed Slovakian uprising in late 1944, with at least six managing to escape to the Soviet Union. Bulgaria received several Fw 189s, which were deployed on the Eastern Front. Additionally, eleven Fw 189s were supplied to Romanian forces, primarily for training purposes, but most were eventually captured by the Soviets. After the war, one aircraft was operated by the RAF for evaluation purposes, but it was lost in a storm while being stored.

Hungarian operated Fw 189. Source: G. Punka Focke-Wulf Fw 189 in Action
A Soviet operated Fw 189, possibly one of the Slovakian managed to escape in late 1944. Source: www.luftwaffephotos.com
Smaller numbers were also allocated to the Bulgarian Air Force. Source: G. Punka Focke-Wulf Fw 189 in Action

After the war

When the war ended, there were few surviving Fw 189. The British managed to capture one in working condition. It was  extensively used by the British pilot Captain Eric Brown, who was the chief test pilot of the Royal Aircraft Establishment at Farnborough. He was involved in a British project tasked with taking over German war research installations and interrogating technical personnel after the war.

He was quite impressed with the overall performance of the Fw 189. After many hours of flying, he noted only one instance of engine failure. Even with just a single engine, the aircraft remained pleasant to fly without significant issues. The main drawback Captain Brown observed was the rather poor forward visibility, despite the extensive glass coverage in the front section. This limitation was primarily due to the shape of the nose. Nevertheless, Captain Brown described the Fw 189 as;

“… A Versatile little beauty to fly and a great asset to the German Army’s ground troop..”

Technical characteristics

The Fw 189 was designed as a twin-engine reconnaissance aircraft with a unique construction. Its centrally positioned fuselage featured extensive glazing and housed the cockpit at the front, followed by a small crew area and a gunner’s compartment at the rear. The fuselage was bulkier at the front and tapered toward the rear. Access to the crew area was provided through two hatches above the cockpit and a larger hatch at the rear. Although the extensive glazing left the crew more exposed to enemy fire, it was ideal for its reconnaissance role, offering excellent all-around visibility.

Font view of the Fw 189 pilot cockpit. Source: www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org
Side view of the glazed fuselage. Source: www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org
Access to the crew area was provided through two hatches above the cockpit and a larger hatch at the rear. Source: www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org

The wings are composed of two distinct sections. The central, square-shaped panel connects the nacelle and engines, while the second section extends outward from the booms. The wings feature a metal base covered with duralumin, though the ailerons and split flaps are clad in fabric. At the rear, the twin-tail assembly includes two large rudders, which are joined by a single long elevator. Both control surfaces on the tail are also covered in fabric.

 

A close-up view of the Fw 189 rear twin-tail unit. Source: www.luftwaffephotos.com

The aircraft was powered by two 465 hp Argus As 410 A-1 12-cylinder air-cooled V-12 engines. These engines demonstrated remarkable effectiveness and reliability, even under the harsh winter conditions of the Eastern Front. With these engines, the Fw 189 achieved a maximum speed of 335 km/h, though exact figures may vary between sources. Each engine drove a two-blade, constant-speed propeller. Fuel was stored in two 110-liter tanks, which were housed in the tail booms. The Fw 189 had a maximum operational range of approximately 670 km.

The landing gear consisted of larger road wheels positioned under each engine nacelle, with a pair of smaller wheels extending from the elevator. Initially, the aircraft used an ‘H’-shaped landing gear leg design, but this was modified during production. To enhance stability during landing, each landing gear leg was equipped with a shock absorber. The front landing gear units were lowered using hydraulic systems, while the rear smaller landing gear units descended under their own weight. When the aircraft’s speed dropped below 160 km/h, the landing gear automatically deployed in preparation for landing. If the pilot wished to override this action, they had the option to disable it by pressing a switch inside the cockpit.

The early prototypes had a single-leg landing gear unit. Source: www.luftwaffephotos.com
Later into production, these were replaced by more stable ‘H’ shaped landing gear legs. Source: www.luftwaffephotos.com

The aircraft’s crew consisted of three members: the pilot, the navigator, and the rear gunner. The pilot occupied the front of the cockpit, while the navigator sat directly behind him. In addition to navigation, the navigator operated the camera equipment and managed the upper rotating machine gun mount. He was also responsible for radio operations. The rear gunner, the final crew member, served as both machine gun operator and the flight engineer.

Most of the pilot’s instruments were were positioned near the cockpit roof, as shown here. Source: /www.luftwaffephotos.com

The primary armament of the Fw 189 consisted of two forward-mounted 7.92 mm MG 17 machine guns, operated by the pilot. The early design included a single machine gun in a rotating mount positioned on the dorsal side. A rear cone-shaped rotating turret housed additional machine guns, initially equipped with drum-fed MG 15s. These were later replaced by four belt-fed MG 81s, which offered a higher rate of fire. Additionally, the aircraft was equipped with two bomb racks under each wing, capable of carrying a 50 kg bomb or, alternatively, smoke gas or chemical containers though the latter were never actually used in combat.

The rear gunner operated a drum feed MG 15 or 17. Source:www.luftwaffephotos.com
These would be on A-2 variant replaced by two faster-firing MG 81 that were instead belt fed. Source: www.luftwaffephotos.com
A good view of the late improved twin machine guns in a rotating mount positioned on the dorsal side. Source: www.luftwaffephotos.com
The Fw 189 could also carry four 50 kg bombs. In this role as a light ground attack aircraft it achieved great success against Soviet partisans. Source: www.luftwaffephotos.com

For conducting reconnaissance operations, various camera equipment was utilized. Typically, an RB 20/30 camera was employed. However, depending on the specific task, this could be augmented or replaced by other models such as the RB 50/30, RB 21/18, or R.R 15/18. Additionally, the navigator was equipped with smaller handheld cameras. For communication, the FuG 25 radio was used.

Production Versions

  • Fw 189V– Small prototypes series
  • Fw 189A0 – Small pre-production series
  • Fw 189A-1 –  Main production variant
    • Fw 189A-2 – Improved model with better defense armament
    • Fw 189A-3 – Dueal control trainer, limited production only
    • Fw 189A-4 – Ground attack variant armed with two 2 cm cannons
  • Fw 189 Trop – A small number of aircraft modified for use in North Africa

Prototype and Proposed  Versions

    • Fw 189B – Trainer variant that was built in small numbers
  • Fw 189C – Ground attack variant, did not go beyond a prototype stage
  • Fw 189D -Experimental variant equipped with twin-floats,
  • Fw 189E – Powered by an As 411MA-1 600 hp strong engine. After the prototype was lost in 1943 the project was abandoned
  • Fw 189F-1 – Powered by an As 411MA-1 600 hp strong engines, A small series of 17 aircraft of this type were built in 1944
    • Fw 189F-2 – Slightly improved model, none were built
  • Fw 189G – Paper project powered by As 402 950 hp engines

Operators

    • Germany – Main use of this aircraft
    • Hungary – Operated less than 30 of these aircraft
    • Slovakia –  Received 14 Fw 189A-1s between 1942 and 1943,
    • Romania – Used an unknown number but mostly for training
  • Bulgaria –Opertaed 14 such aircraft
    • Soviet Union – The Red Army on occasion managed to capture some Fw 189 that they put into use
  • UK – British Force captured at least one working Fw 189 after the war

Surviving aircraft

It is believed that only one Fw 189 aircraft has survived to this day, and it has a remarkable history. The aircraft was shot down by Soviet fighters in May 1943 near Murmansk in northern Europe. It crash-landed in the woods, resulting in the deaths of the navigator and the rear gunner. The pilot, Lothar Mothes, survived the crash landing and managed to reach the German defense lines two weeks later. Although the Soviets recorded the crash site, they did not recover the wreckage. It remained there until 1992, when British aircraft enthusiast and restorer Jim Pearce initiated a recovery effort. Using a helicopter, Pearce salvaged the relatively well-preserved Fw 189 wreckage and transported it back to the UK for possible restoration.

The aircraft was publicly displayed at the Biggin Hill Air Show in 1996, where pilot Lothar Mothes had the opportunity to see his lost aircraft once more. Despite his hopes, Pearce was unable to secure the funds necessary for a full restoration, so the aircraft was sold to G. Allen’s Flying Heritage Collection in 2007. Over the following years, the aircraft underwent nearly complete restoration. Hopefully, one day, this sole surviving Fw 189 will once again take to the skies.

The only known Fw 189 that is being under restoration. Sourcewww.scramble.nl

Conclusion

Despite its unusual design, especially for the early stages of the war, the aircraft proved to be remarkable in many respects. Its glazed cockpit provided an excellent all-around view. The engine was reliable, with no major mechanical issues reported. Although it had a somewhat fragile appearance, the aircraft was noted for its robust performance.

Although originally designed for reconnaissance operations, the Fw 189 also proved successful in various other roles. In conclusion, the Fw 189 was undoubtedly one of the best German aircraft designs to see service during the Second World War.

Fw 189A-1 Specifications

Wingspans 18.4 m / 60 ft 4 in
Length 12 m / 39 ft 5 in
Height 3.1 m / 10 ft 2 in
Wing Area 38m² / 410 ft²
Engine Two 465 hp Argus As 410 A-1 engines
Empty Weight 2,805 kg / 6,185 lbs
Maximum Take-off Weight 3,950 kg / 8,708 lbs
Maximum Speed 335 km/h / 208 mph
Cruising Speed 315 km/h / 196 mph
Range 670 km / 416 miles
Maximum Service Ceiling 7,000 m / 22,965 ft
Crew pilot, rear gunner, and navigator
Armament
  • Four 7.92 mm machine guns
  • Four 50 kg (110 lb) bombs

Illustration

Credits

Source:

  • D. Donald (1996) German Aircraft of World War II, Orbis Publishing
  • D. Nesic  (2008)  Naoružanje Drugog Svetsko Rata-Nemacka
  • D. Monday (2006) The Hamlyn Concise Guide To Axis Aircraft OF World War II, Bounty Books
  • J. R. Smith and A. L. Kay (1972) German Aircraft of the WW2, Putnam
  • G. Punka (1993) Focke-Wulf Fw 189 in Action, Signal Publication
  • Captain E. ‘Winkle’ Brown (2010) Wings of the Luftwaffe, Hikoki Publication
  • T. Boiten () Nachtjagd Combat Archive – Eastern Front and The Med, Red Kite
  • https://vintageaviationnews.com/warbirds-news/unique-focke-wulf-fw-189-offered-for-sale.html

 

Source:  https://www.luftwaffephotos.com/#fightermenu

 

Fiat G.50 In Finnish Service 

Finnish flag Finland (1940-1944)
 Fighter – Number operated: 35

In late 1939, the rapid expansion of the Soviet Union in Eastern Europe caused great alarm in Finland. As a politically isolated nation with limited funds, Finland struggled to equip its military for a potential war with the Soviets. Despite the challenges they faced, they achieved some limited success in finding the equipment they needed. While the Finnish armed forces lacked for many modern weapons, they possessed a small number of advanced fighter aircraft, though not enough in the face of a Soviet invasion. To address this, they approached the Kingdom of Italy and acquired 35 Fiat G.50 Freccia fighters. While the G.50 was not an exceptional fighter in terms of overall performance, it was sufficient for the Finnish Air Forces and remained in frontline service until 1944.

The Fiat F.50 in Finnish service. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiat_G.50_Freccia

Finland’s Early Struggle to Survive 

Following the collapse of the Russian Empire, and the subsequent Civil War, Finland emerged as an independent state. While it did not have great relations with the neighboring Soviet Union, Finland’s first two decades of independent existence proved to be mostly peaceful. This changed drastically on 27th August 1939, when a secret meeting between German Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop and Soviet Foreign Minister Vyacheslav Molotov resulted in the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. This non-aggression pact had secret protocols dividing Eastern Europe into spheres of influence, which directly affected Finland. As part of the agreement,  Germany agreed to let the Soviets occupy former territories that had belonged to the Russian Empire. By September, the Soviets were in the process of occupying the Baltic states under the pretext of defending against a possible German attack. These countries were mostly too small to offer any real resistance to the Soviet demands.

Fearing a potential war with the rapidly expanding Soviet Union, Finnish military officials sought to acquire as many weapons and as much material as possible, including aircraft. As part of this, a delegation was dispatched to Italy. This delegation visited Turin in 1939, where new G.50 fighter was being tested. The Finnish representatives were impressed with the aircraft’s performance and promptly placed an order for 35 brand-new G.50s.

In November 1939, while testing the G.50’s capabilities, Finnish pilot Tapani Harmaja took a sharp dive from an altitude of over 3.5 km, reaching a remarkable speed of 830 km/h during his descent. Ironically, this was the highest speed achieved by any Italian aircraft up to that date.

Purchasing the 35 aircraft was the easy part; transporting them to Finland proved to be a much more challenging task. By then, the Second World War had already begun in Europe with the German invasion of Poland. With limited options, the aircraft were disassembled into smaller parts and transported by train to northern Germany. From there, they were loaded onto ships bound for neutral Sweden. Due to various delays, the first aircraft was not fully assembled until mid-December 1939, and the last of the 35 ordered fighters did not arrive in Finland until June 1940.

In the hope of acquiring more modern fighters Finland purchased 35 new Fiat G.50 fighters from Italy. Source:  airpages.ru

The Fiat G.50, a Brief History

During the 1930s, the Italian Ministry of Aviation (Ministero dell’aeronautica) was interested in adopting a new, all-metal monoplane fighter and ground-attack aircraft for the Italian Air Force (Regia Aeronautica). In April of 1935, engineer Giuseppe Gabrielli began working on a new low-wing, all-metal aircraft designated G.50. On 28th September 1935, Gabrielli submitted his project to the Ministry of Aviation. Military officials were impressed by the design and ordered him to proceed with his work. As Fiat’s production capacities were overburdened, work on this new project was instead moved to the Costruzioni Meccaniche Aeronautiche (CMASA) works at the Marina di Pisa, which had been a part of Fiat since 1931. By 1936, Giuseppe Gabrielli had completed his last drawings and the list of needed materials and equipment in.

The prototype was completed in early 1937 and was transported to the city of Turin for further testing. The prototype, under registration number MM 334, made its first test flight on 26 February 1937. Once accepted for service, the Fiat G.50 would become the first Italian all-metal monoplane fighter. Between 1938 to 1943, some 774 to 791 G. 50s would be built. These saw combat service starting from 1938 in the Spanish Civil War, until 1943 when the few surviving aircraft were reassigned to secondary roles.

G.50s flying in formation with a German Bf-110, possibly during the Battle of Britain Source; Wikipedia

In Finnish Service

While the G.50 proved to be a fairly modern fighter, they arrived too late and in too few numbers to have any real impact in the Winter War. The Soviet Union then demanded territorial concessions from Finland, particularly the lease of the Karelian Isthmus and other areas near Leningrad. The Finns were reluctant to comply, leading to unsuccessful negotiations. When diplomatic negotiations failed, the Soviet Union launched a military offensive against Finland on 30 November 1939. Despite being outnumbered and outgunned, the Finnish military, with their knowledge of the terrain and effective guerrilla tactics, inflicted significant casualties on the Soviet forces. The harsh winter conditions also worked to Finland’s advantage.

With the gradual arrival of the G.50, these aircraft were assigned to the  Lentolaivue 26, or shortened, LeLv 26 (REng. 26th Fighter Wing). This unit was based at Haukkajärvi. Although the G.50s arrived late, they still saw significant action. Between February and March 1940, Finnish pilots flying these aircraft managed to shoot down 11 Soviet planes, losing only one of their own.

There is some disagreement among sources and authors regarding the use of the Fiat G.50 during the Winter War. According to P. Vergnano (Fiat G.50), the aircraft was deployed in this conflict. However, other authors, such as G. Cattaneo (The Fiat G.50), state that 14 aircraft reached Finland by February 1940, and were assigned to the 26th Fighter Wing, but they did not see action until after March 1940. D. Monday (The Hamlyn Concise Guide to Axis Aircraft of World War II), simply mentions that they arrived too late to participate in the Winter War.

Despite the Finns’ valiant resistance, they were eventually forced into peace negotiations with the Soviets. The war concluded with the signing of the Treaty of Moscow on 12th March 1940. Though brief, the conflict was costly for both sides, and Finland was compelled to cede roughly 10% of its territory to the Soviet Union, including the Karelian Isthmus. Finnish military officials, however, recognized the need to prepare for future conflicts.

Camouflage And Marking

Initially, the G.50 would use camouflage of Italian origin, featuring a combination of green, brown, and sand backgrounds. In 1941, at the insistence of the Germans, the original Italian camouflage colors would remain unchanged for the Finnish planes. However, the Italian paint was prone to peeling, so ground crews used whatever was available to repair the damage. After 1942, most aircraft were repainted with Finnish camouflage colors, such as black, olive green, and light blue.

The first aircraft that arrived in Finland was designated with the code SA-1. This was later changed to FA-1 (up to FA-35) in late January 1940, with the capital ‘F’ standing for Fiat.

The standard Finnish Insignia was a Hakaristi cross, commonly referred to as a swastika, on either side of the fuselage. The Finnish Hakaristi is often conflated with the swastika used by Nazi Germany, however, the Hakaristi was not derived from the German swastika and had been used in Finland since 1918, drawing from much older cultural use. The Hakaristi markings were blue with a round shape and a white background.

Additionally, commanding fighters often had large numbers painted on their tails. The first squadron fighter leader’s aircraft had a light blue number, followed by a black number with yellow trim for the second, and a yellow number for the third. After 1942, the light blue color was replaced by a simpler white.

The first G.50 (initially marked as SA-1 later changed to FA-1) reached Finland. This aircraft used for initial testing and crew training. Source: en.topwar.ru
The standard Finnish roundel was a Hakaristi cross which as painted on the fuselage sides. Source: ww2aircraft.net
The first squadron fighter leader’s aircraft had a light blue number, followed by a black number with yellow trim for the second, and a yellow number for the third. After 1942, the light blue color was replaced by a simpler white. Source: ww2aircraft.net

Continuation War 

While not fully aligned with Nazi Germany, Finland did allow the Wehrmacht access to Northern Finland. Finland later signed the Anti-Comintern Pact, which was initially an anti-communist pact between Germany and Japan, with other minor nations signing throughout the war. Prior to this, relations had already been previously established, which was convenient for both nations, as Germany could stage their military in Lapland, and other areas of Finland, for Operation Barbarossa. In turn, Finland would be granted the military assistance they needed. However, this ended all support, both material and political, from the Western Allies. On the 22nd of June 1941, Germany’s invasion of the Soviet Union began, assisted by some Finnish forces. Three days later, the Soviets staged air raids against nearby Finnish cities, thus beginning the Continuation War. Finland never sought to gain any additional territory from the conflict, only to regain control of what was initially lost during the Winter War.

Just before the outbreak of the Continuation War, the Finns observed that the newly arrived G.50 aircraft were somewhat ill-suited for operating in the harsh Northern climate. This was not entirely unexpected, as the aircraft had been designed in Italy, a much warmer region, and the designers had not anticipated the need for the G.50 to function in colder parts of the world. In response, the Finnish Army attempted to modify the G.50 to enhance its effectiveness in these conditions.

The G.50s that the Finns received were from the first production series, which featured enclosed cockpits. This design element was not well received by Finnish pilots, leading to the replacement of the enclosed cockpits with open ones. Additionally, the aircraft’s variable-pitch propeller mechanism had a tendency to freeze in low temperatures, risking critical component failure. To address this issue, the Finns turned to Sweden for assistance, importing Swedish propeller spinners that were better suited for cold climates. These spinners were originally used on Swedish-imported CR.42 and J11 biplanes, which had faced similar issues.

Further modifications included replacing the original G.50 fins and rudders with improved versions. Finnish engineers also experimented with the installation of landing skis for use in snowy conditions.

To avoid freezing of some parts of the propellers, Finish engineers added a new Swedish propeller spinner, as seen here. Source: P. Verganano Fiat G.50

When the war resumed, the 26th Fighter Wing, stationed at an airfield near Utti, was tasked with defending the area around Lake Ladoga, where they saw the bulk of their action. From the outset, Finnish pilots operating the G.50 achieved remarkable success. On the first day of the conflict, the six G.50s managed to shoot down ten Soviet bombers without suffering any losses. One pilot, Oiva Tuominen, alone shot down four of these bombers within a matter of minutes. Tuominen would go on to become one of Finland’s top fighter aces, credited with a total of 23 air victories (though some sources claim 33 or even 43), with around 15 of these achieved while flying the G.50. For his service, he was awarded the Mannerheim Cross, Finland’s highest military decoration at the time. In 1941, following the German invasion, the number of Soviet aircraft on this front sharply declined.

In late August 1941, they successfully shot down nine Soviet fighters. By the end of the war, pilots of the 26th Fighter Wing had achieved approximately 88 air victories, with the loss of 11 G.50 aircraft. Of these, only two were downed by Soviet fighters, one was lost to anti-aircraft fire, and eight were lost due to accidents or mechanical failures.

By 1943, the introduction of newer Soviet fighter models and better-trained pilots forced the Finnish Air Force primarily into a defensive role. At this point, the G.50 was clearly obsolete as a frontline fighter, but due to a lack of alternatives, it remained in service until 1944. After May 1944, the surviving aircraft were withdrawn and relegated to secondary roles, such as training. However, by the end of the war, several operational G.50 fighters remained in use, with some continuing to serve until 1947.

Technical characteristics

The G.50 was a single-seat, low-wing, all-metal fighter plane. The fuselage was made from four angular longerons. The wing construction consisted of a center section which was made of a steel tube connected to the lower fuselage and two metal spars connected with ribs. The fuselage, wing, and tail were covered with duralumin sheets. The only fabric-covered parts of the aircraft were the movable control surfaces in the wings and the tail. The G.50 was powered by the 840 hp (626 kW) Fiat A 74 RC 38, a 14-cylinder radial piston engine, which drove an all-metal three-blade propeller produced by Fiat.

The G.50 was equipped, like most modern aircraft of the time, with inward retracting landing gear, but the rear tail wheel was fixed. In later improved versions, the rear tail wheel was changed to a retractable type as well.

The armament consisted of two forward-firing 12.7mm Breda-SAFAT heavy machine guns, with 150 rounds of ammunition for each gun. The guns were placed behind the upper engine cowl and were synchronized in order not to damage the propeller.

In Finnish service, these aircraft received several modifications as mentioned earlier. This included an open pilot cockpit, enlarged tail control surfaces, and propeller spinners which protected the variable pitch mechanism from the cold climate.

The Finnish version could be easily identified by the open cockpit and the use of an engine spinner, Source: www.militaryimages.net

Conclusion

The acquisition of the Fiat G.50 provided Finnish pilots with a more modern fighter aircraft. While the design was not exceptional from the start, the Finns managed to put it to good use, achieving relatively good success against the Soviet Air Force. The G.50 remained in service well into the later stages of the war.

Specification G.50 Fighter
Wingspan 35 ft 11 in / 10.9 m
Length 26 ft  3 in / 8 m
Height 10 ft 7 in / 3.28 m
Wing Area 196.5 ft² / 18.25 m²
Engine One 840 hp (626 kW) Fiat A.74 RC.38, 14 cylinder radial piston
Empty Weight 4,353 lbs / 1,975 kg
Maximum Takeoff Weight 5,324 lbs / 2,415 kg
Fuel Capacity 316 l
Maximum Speed 292 mph / 470 km/h
Range 267 mi / 445 km
Maximum Service Ceiling 35,100 ft (10,700 m)
Climb speed Climb to 19,700 ft (6,000 m) in 7 minutes and 30 seconds
Crew One pilot
Armament
  • Two 12.7 mm Breda-SAFAT heavy machine guns

Illustration

Credits

  • Article written by Marko P.
  • Edited by  Henry H.
  • Illustration by Haryo Panji

Sources 

  • V. Nenye (2016) Finland At War  The Continuation And Lapland Wars 1941-45, Osprey Publishing
  • V. Nenye (2015) Finland At War The Winter War, Osprey Publishing
  • P. Jowett and B. Snodgrass (2006) Finland At War 1939-45, Osprey Publishing
  • D. Nesic (2008)  Naoružanje Drugog Svetsko Rata-Italija. Beograd
  • C. Shores (1979) Regia Aeronautica Vol. I, Signal publication.
  • D. Monday (2006) The Hamlyn Concise Guide To Axis Aircraft OF World War II, Bounty Books.
  • V. Nenye (2016) Finland At War The Continuation And Lapland Wars 1941-45, Osprey Publishing
  • V. Nenye (2015) Finland At War The Winter War, Osprey Publishing
  • P. Jowett and B. Snodgrass (2006) Finland At War 1939-45, Osprey Publishing
  • P. Verganano (1997)  Fiat G.50, La Bancarella Aeronautica
  • A, Brioschi (2000) I Colori Del Fiat G.50, La Bancarella Aeronautica
  • G. Cattaneo The Fiat G.50, Profile Publication

 

Dewoitine D.520 in Regia Aeronautica Service 

italian flag Kingdom of Italy/Italian Social Republic  (1941-1945)
Fighter – Approximately 60 Airframes Received

The Dewoitine D.520 was an advanced French fighter aircraft of the Second World War, which had been employed in large numbers during the Battle of France. After the French Campaign, the German forces captured dozens of Dewoitine D.520s in working order, of which 60 were delivered to the Italian Regia Aeronautica (Royal Air Force) in two separate batches of 30 planes.

Leftovers

Of those, some were never retrieved from the French airports they were left at, and others were disassembled, and cannibalized for spare parts. For these reasons, and the absence of data in Italian official documents, many of their stories have been lost to time.

Prior to being supplied any D.520 by the Luftwaffe, the Italian Regio Esercito (Royal Army) had captured about 30 Dewoitine D.520s during its involvement in the Battle of France. These were almost immediately delivered to the Regia Aeronautica. According to the official documentation, the first three specimens were assigned to 2° Stormo Caccia (Eng: 2nd Fighter Wing), even if it is not clear when they were delivered and to which squadron.

Regia Aeronautica D.520 of an unidentified squadron. The planes have by this point received Italian markings, such as the cross and the white band, but the base camouflage appears to remain the one featured on the original French planes, with the exception of the red propeller hub. Source: Pinterest

The command of the 2° Stormo was based at the Turin-Mirafiori airport after the 20th of January 1941, with 68 pilots and 119 mechanics, a total of 12 FIAT C.R. 42, and waiting for the new Macchi M.C. 202. For two months, they defended the largest industrial centers in northern Italy, such as Turin, Milan, Genoa, and Savona. At the end of February, the first Macchi M.C. 200 and some CR 42s arrived, bringing the department’s equipment to 62 MC 200s and 22 CR 42s, but with no mention of the Dewoitines.

There appear to have been three D.520s available. Due to a lack of spare parts and 20 mm ammunition (the Hispano-Suiza did not fire the same 20 mm cartridges produced in Italy), these were rarely used by pilots, except for training to fight against the French aircraft.

A Regia Aeronautica D.520. This picture is referred to as having been taken either in France, before the aircraft was transferred to Italy, or on an airfield in Southern Italy. Source: Pinterest

The remaining Dewoitines captured by Italy were kept at the airports of Montélimar, Orange, Istres, and Aix-en-Provence, and at the Toulouse factory until the beginning of 1943, when some Italian pilots, including Pilot Sergeant Luigi Gorrini (19 kills and 9 probable) had the task of transferring them to Italy.

Of these new D.520s taken over by the Regia Aeronautica, 8 went to equip the 22° Gruppo Autonomo Caccia Terrestre (22nd Autonomous Terrestrial Fighter Group) in late February 1943 at the airport of Capodichino. The French aircraft were deployed alongside the Macchi M.C. 202, the Reggiane Re. 2001, and some pre-series Reggiane Re. 2005. These aircraft were used to intercept the American B-24 bombers which increasingly hit the city of Naples.

The Dewoitine proved to be very efficient in this task, managing to damage several bombers, often causing the bombers to abort their missions. They were helped by their powerful 20 mm cannon, which at the time had no equivalent on the Italian fighters of the unit (except for the Re. 2005). This is not particularly surprising, as the cannon firing through the propeller hub, a feature of the D.520, and in general most French fighters of the era, was found to be highly accurate in most situations, though limited by a magazine of only 60 rounds. The Italian planes, such as the Macchis and the FIATs, were less precise, but had increased magazines that guaranteed the possibility to commit to several attacks.

On March 1st, 1943, Major Vittorio Minguzzi, commander of the 22° Gruppo Autonomo Caccia Terrestre, and a Reggiane Re. 2005 veteran, shot down a B-24 in the middle of a  bombing run over Naples with a D.520. This kill, considered probable for a long time until the discovery of the bomber’s wreck, was the first recorded victory by a D.520 of the Regia Aeronautica, even if it is likely some Allied aircraft had already fallen victim to Italian D.520s in the previous weeks.

Details of the nose of a D.520 during the plane’s showcase to General Mazzucco, 19th of May 1943. Source: Pinterest

On 19th May 1943 in Littoria, the 371ª Squadriglia Caccia Terrestri (371th Terrestrial Fighter Squadron) officially presented the French fighter to General Renato Mazzucco, commander of the 3ª Divisione Aerea (3rd Air Division), who had come to visit their airbase. This confirms that the 371ª Squadriglia Caccia Terrestri also had a certain number of Dewoitines in service.

On 21st May 1943, the Regia Aeronautica delivered 39 Lioré et Olivier LeO 451 bombers previously captured in the SNCASE factory in Lyon’s Ambérieu-en-Bugey to the Luftwaffe in exchange for the delivery of 30 French Dewoitine D.520s captured by the Germans and apparently never used after the French surrender.

Apparently, these aircraft were delivered without ammunition, without any spare parts, and with evident damage to the weapons and equipment on board. It is supposed this damage was sabotage performed by French pilots, before their aircraft fell into Axis hands during the Battle of France.

After Italian mechanics disassembled some of them to cannibalize the spare parts, these Dewoitines were supplied to the 161° Gruppo Autonomo Caccia Terrestre (161st Autonomous Terrestrial Fighter Group) based at several airports in southern Italy. The numbers are not known, but they were used by the 163a Squadriglia Caccia Terrestri (163rd Terrestrial Fighter Squadron) in Grottaglie, 162a Squadriglia Caccia Terrestri (162nd Terrestrial Fighter Squadron)  in Crotone, and 164a Squadriglia Caccia Terrestri (164th Terrestrial Fighter Squadron)  in Reggio Calabria together with a force of Italian fighters.

Other units that used the D.520 were the 355a Squadriglia (355th Squadron)  and the 370a Squadriglia (370th Squadron), with both units receiving three each, under the 24° Gruppo Autonomo Caccia Terrestre (24th Autonomous Terrestrial Fighter Group).

The 232a Squadriglia Caccia (232nd Fighter Squadron) of the 59° Gruppo Bombardamento Terrestre (59th Terrestrial Bombardment Group) received an unknown number of D.520s for escort duties alongside Savoia Marchetti S.M. 79 three-engine bombers. An unspecified number were used by the 167º Gruppo Autonomo Intercettori (167th Autonomous Interceptor Group) based in Guidonia with the specific task of defending the city from bombers. It is also known that  D.520s were used by the 60° Gruppo Bombardamento Terrestre (60th Terrestrial Bombardment Group), and the 13° Gruppo Caccia (13th Fighter Group), the latter being stationed at the Arena Metano Airport near Pisa.

According to official records, on July 31st, 1943, the Regia Aeronautica still had 47 Dewoitine D.520s in service, which were used mostly in the role of bomber interceptors.

In the confusion that followed after the armistice of 8th September 1943, the departments of the Royal Italian Army parted ways. Some, continuing to fight for the Axis, became part of the Aeronautica Nazionale Repubblicana or ANR (Republican National Air Force). The Aeronautica Cobelligerante Italiana (Italian Co-belligerent Air Force) fought for the Allies, but did not use the D.520.

Many Dewoitines were destroyed by pilots and mechanics, or were captured by the Germans, who re-used them in the Luftwaffe.

The ANR took possession of three D.520s previously in service with the 24° Gruppo Autonomo Caccia Terrestre. These three aircraft were assigned to the recently established 101º Gruppo autonomo caccia (101st Autonomous Fighter Group) in Turin-Mirafiori for training tasks with Macchi M.C. 200 and FIAT C.R. 42 and, disbanded some time later, without ever taking part in combat.

Italian Evaluation 

The Italian judgment of the Dewoitine D.520 was not entirely positive for two reasons. The first is to be found in a nationalist perspective, which gave a negative perception for the foreign D.520. Secondly, pilots such as the ace Luigi Gorrini, who had the opportunity to test it in simulated combat against other fighters, did not consider it agile enough compared to contemporary aircraft, such as the Macchi M.C. 200. Italian pilots considered the D.520 inferior to the Macchi in all areas except armament.

However, the spacious cockpit, the very efficient communication system (when not tampered with), and the 20 mm cannon were praised. These would only be introduced on Italian aircraft starting from 1943. Against US bombers, the guns made a marked difference even if the little ammunition on board was often a limiting factor. The same had been found by French pilots during the campaign of France, who often had to rely on the machine-guns if the mission went on for too long; this was more of an issue against the more robust bombers which were being fielded by 1943.

Italian camouflage and markings 

The typical camouflage used on the Italian planes was similar to the original French one. The coat of arms of the French Air Force was covered with new layers of paint, adding a band on both sides of the wings and one on the fuselage with white paint. The Croce di Savoia was painted on the rudder, a distinctive symbol of Italian aircraft since June 1940. An interesting note is that the Croce di Savoia on the Dewoitines was painted without the coat of arms of the Italian royal family.

A Dewoitine D. 520 of the 24° Gruppo Autonomo Caccia Terrestre with its distinctive coat of arms. Olbia, Sardinia 1943. Source: Pinterest

At least one specimen was painted in an aluminum color (since the photo is in black and white, for a long time, it was believed to be in Olive Green). It had the typical coat of arms of Italian fighters, the Fasci Littori, on the sides of the cockpit and the ‘Fasci Littori Alari’ symbol of the Regia Aeronautica on the wings. This unique example was painted on the occasion of General Mazzucco’s visit to Guidonia.

The 59° Gruppo Bombardamento Terrestre aircraft received the standard camouflage used in North Africa by the Royal Italian Air Force, khaki with dark green spots. These D. 520s were painted with the Savoia royal family coat of arms.

The ANR specimens were painted in light gray with dark gray spots, a tricolor on the fuselage and rudder and the ‘Fasci Littori Alari’ on the wings. According to evidence, at least one specimen remained in the classic French camouflage, perhaps being repainted into the ANR camouflage at a later time.

Conclusions 

Despite the little information on the operational history of the Dewoitine D.520s in Italian service, we can suppose that it was appreciated by the Italian pilots, even for their rancor against all aircraft of foreign origin. The limited numbers received and deployed by the Italian units did not permit a great service of these French aircraft by the Regia Aeronautica. For much of their service, these planes were held at airports for maintenance.

Dewoitine D.520C-1 specifications

Wingspan 10.18 m
Length 8.75 m
Height 2.55 m
Wing Area 16 m²
Engine Hispano-Suiza 12Y-45
Power at Critical Altitude 935 hp at 4,200 m
Max RPM 2,400 RRM
Propeller Three-bladed Ratier or Chauvière (3 m diameter)
Empty Weight 2,050 kg
Maximum Takeoff Weight 2,740 kg
Wing Load 195 kg/m²
Fuel Capacity 400 liters standard

640 liters with wing fuel tanks

Time to Altitude 4,000 m in 5’13”

6,000 m in 7’57”

8,000 m in 13’24”

Maximum Speed 425 km/h at sea level

535 km/h at 6,750 m

Cruising Speed 400 km/h
Stall Speed 125 km/h
Range Around 900 km with a standard fuel load

1,500 km at max fuel load (equipped w/ wing tanks)

Maximum Service Ceiling 11,000 m /
Crew 1 Pilot
Armament 20 mm HS-404 firing through the propeller hub with 60 rounds

4x MAC34M39 machine guns with 675 rounds per gun in the wings

Number Completed 60 officially delivered to Regia Aeronautica unknown used in active service

Illustrations

Credits

  • Written by Arturo Giusti
  • Edited by Henry H.
  • Illustrations by Oussama Mohamed “Godzilla”

Sources

 

CR.32bis in Austrian Service

Austria (1936)

Biplane Fighter: Number operated 45

In the search for more modern fighters, Austria acquired some 45 CR.32bis biplane fighters from Italy. These were some of the best biplane designs in the years before the war, but were quickly deemed obsolete once they encountered more modern fighters. In Austrian hands, these would only have a limited service life, as two years later this country would be annexed by Nazi Germany.

Austrian-operated CR.32bis biplane fighter. Source: https://www.airhistory.net/photo/304058/177

History

Following the end of the First World War, the once mighty Austro-Hungarian Empire ceased to exist. Its territories were taken by its neighbors, or given to newly created states that emerged following the war. What was left of Austria was deprived of its military force and sounded by not-so-friendly countries.

To acquire some modern aircraft for its air force, an Austrian delegation visited Italy. After examining various designs, the Austrian Federal Ministry of National Defence agreed to buy 45 CR.32bis biplane fighter aircraft at the start of 1936. These were better-armed and slightly improved versions, with two additional machine guns positioned in the wings. Once in Austria, they were used to equip  Jagdgeschwader II stationed at Wiener Neustadt.

In total, Austria acquired 45 of the CR.32bis from Italy in early 1936. Source: forum.axishistory.com

A Brief CR.32  History

The success of the CR.30 prompted the Italians to further improve this design. A prototype of the improved CR.32 was completed and flight-tested in April 1933. Following the successful test trials, the aircraft was accepted to service and put into mass production, proving to be one of the better biplane designs that arose just before the Second World War. It achieved great export success as it was sold worldwide such as in China, Hungary, Spain, Venezuela, and Austria. While it performed well during the Spanish Civil War, the days of the biplane fighter were gone, replaced by the more modern single-wing fighter. Thus the Cr.32s in service by the Italian Air Force suffered heavy losses when they encountered more modern fighters.

The Italian CR.32 biplane fighter. Source: Wiki

In Austrian Service

As mentioned, the CR.32bis was allocated to the Jagdgeschwader II. this unit was divided into three squadrons (Jagdstaffeln) 4/II, 5II, and 6/II. Their service life within the Austrian Air Force was rather limited and besides some military exercises, they did not see any combat action.

Austria was never in a good geopolitical situation. From the north, they were constantly under pressure from Nazy Germany, who tried several times to direct the Austrian government to its side. For example, in 1934 Nazis organized the assassination of Austrian Chancellor Engelbert Dollfuss. While this did not change the political situation to Germany’s favor, due to Italian intervention, the Austrian government remained in a great crisis. By 1938, the relationship between Germany and Italy was improving, determining the fate of Austria. In March 1938, the German Army moved into Austria and essentially took over the country in an event known today as the  Anschluss.

The equipment of the Austrian Army and Air Force were captured by the Germans. The Jagdgeschwader II was renamed to I.Gruppe – Jagdgeschwader 138 and was relocated to Aspern. The Germans never tried to incorporate the CR.32 into their forces, they were only briefly used as training aircraft. Eventually, the 36 available CR.32 aircraft would be sold to Hungary which already had this aircraft.

A total of 45 CR.32 were allocated to the Jagdgeschwader II. Source: /fighters.forumactif.com
In German service, the CR.32 would see quite limited service as a training aircraft. Seeing no proposal to operate them any further, these would be sold to Hungary. Source:acesflyinghighthesurvivors.wordpress.com
At least one CR.32 would be damaged during a landing accident by the new owners. Source: Pinterest

Camouflage and Marking

The Austrians used a combination of silver paint and natural metal for this aircraft’s liveries. In addition, the wings struts were painted in black.  Regarding national marking, they added an Austrian flag which was painted on the aircraft tail. On the fuselage sides, a red circle with a white triangle was painted followed by a vertical red stripe.

The Austrians added a red-white-red flag which was painted on the aircraft tail. On the fuselage sides, usually a red circle with a white triangle was painted followed by a vertical red stripe. On occasions some aircraft such as this one received additional markings. Source:  fighters.forumactif.com

Technical Specification

The Fiat CR.32 was designed as a biplane, mixed-construction fighter. The fuselage frame was made using four longerons connected to a triangle-shaped framework. The fuselage was covered in sheet metal, except with some minor parts which were covered in fabric. Wings were made of two spars connected with a duralumin tube and then covered in fabric. The landing gear consisted of two forward-mounted wheels which were connected to the fuselage and a tail wheel. The armament consisted of two 7.7 cm (0.3 in), or two 12.7 cm (0.5 in) machine guns. The ammunition load for the former was 750 and the latter 350 per machine gun. Both of these were mounted above the engine compartment.

The CR.32bis was a slightly improved version that incorporated the addition of two lower-wing positioned machine guns. Source: acesflyinghighthesurvivors.wordpress.com

Conclusion

The CR.32bis was the best available Austrian fighter aircraft. Unfortunately for them, the geopolitical situation in this part of Europe was not in their favor. The rising Nazi Germany for years tried to annex this small country, which they eventually achieved in 1938. The annexation of Austria also meant the end of their short-lived Air Force.

CR.32bis  Specifications

Wingspans 9.5 m / 31  ft 2  in
Length 7.45 m / 24 ft 5  in
Height 2.63 m / 8  ft 7  in
Wing Area 22.1 m² / 238 ft²
Engine One 600 hp Fiat A.30 RA bis 12-cylinder piston engine
Empty Weight 1,400 kg / 3,086 lbs
Maximum Take-off Weight 1,970 kg / 4,343 lbs
Maximum Speed 350 km/h / 217 mph
Range 680 km / 422 miles
Maximum Service Ceiling 8,800 m / 28,870 ft
Crew 1 pilot
Armament
  • Two 12,7 mm or two 7.7 mm machine guns in the upper fuselage
  • Two 7.7 mm in the lower wings

Illustration

 

Credits

  • Written by Marko P.
  • Edited by Henry H.
  • Illustrations by Oussama Mohamed “Godzilla”

Source:

  • D. Nesic  (2008)  Naoružanje Drugog Svetsko Rata-Italija
  • (1996) CR 32 Ali D’ITalia, La Bancarella Aeronautica Torino
  • G. Cattaneo (1965) The Fiat CR.32, Profile Publication
  • G. punka (2000) Fiat CR 32/CR 42 In Action, Signal publication
  • D. Monday (2006) The Hamlyn Concise Guide To Axis Aircraft OF World War II, Bounty Books

 

 

 

Me 109 in Independent State of Croatia Service

Independent State of Croatia flag Independent State of Croatia (1944-1945)
Fighter –  15 to 30 Operated

Following the collapse of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia after the Axis invasions in April of 1941, the Nezavisna Država Hrvatska (Eng. Independent State of Croatia) was created. It immediately began forming its military, including an air force. This air force, while managing to acquire a few hundred aircraft of various types, always lacked fighter planes. Nothing major was done to improve them in this regard up to 1944, when finally, Germany agreed to send a small group of Me 109’s to the NDH to bolster their fighter force.

An Me 109G in NDH Service. Source: www.britmodeller.com

History

After Italy’s unsuccessful invasion of Greece, Benito Mussolini was forced to ask his German ally for help. Adolf Hitler agreed to assist, fearing that a possible Allied attack through the Balkans would reach Romania and its vital oil fields. In the path of the German advance towards Greece stood Yugoslavia, whose government initially agreed to join the Axis side. This agreement was short-lived, as the Yugoslav government was overthrown by an anti-Axis, pro-Allied military coup at the end of March 1941. Hitler immediately gave an order for the preparation of the invasion of Yugoslavia. The war that began on 6th April 1941, sometimes called the April War, was a short one and ended with a Yugoslav defeat and the division of its territory between the Axis powers.

With the collapse of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, Croatia, with German aid, was finally able to declare independence, albeit becoming a fascist puppet state. It was officially formed on the 10th of April 1941. The new state received a significant territorial expansion by annexing most of western Yugoslavia, including Bosnia, parts of Serbia, and Montenegro.

While the conquest of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia proved to be an easy task for the Axis, holding these territories proved to be much more difficult. This was mainly due to two major resistance movements that were actively engaged in sabotage, destroying railways and bridges, and attacking isolated occupation units’ positions and strong points. Despite attempts to suppress these attacks, the resistance movements, especially the Communist Partisans, grew rapidly, forcing the Germans and their Allies to introduce ever-larger occupation forces. The NDH forces were especially targeted by the resistance as they committed numerous war crimes, including mass murders and deportations to concentration camps. Thanks to German help, they managed to form a small air force that had in its inventory all kinds of obsolete, and in rare cases, modern equipment. By 1943, it was in the process of reorganization, and the NDH officials during this period often asked their German overlords for more modern aircraft. Sometimes they even portrayed their own Air Force as being weaker than it was in the hope of getting military aid. Eventually, near the end of the war, several dozen Me 109s were sent from Germany to NDH.

A Brief Me 109 History

The Me 109 was Willy Messerschmitt’s response to the German Air Force’s request for a modern fighter in 1934. Despite being a completely unknown aircraft designer, his aircraft, thanks to its simplicity and performance, easily beat the competition. Soon after it entered mass production in 1936. It was quite an advanced design for its time and superior to most fighters around the world. Over the years various versions were built, each introducing various modifications. Some were even specially made for various other roles, such as training or reconnaissance. By the end of the war over 30.000 were built making it the second most produced military aircraft in history. Given the sheer number of produced aircraft, it should not be surprising that many were sold or given to various nations in Europe.

One of the most iconic fighters of the Second World War was the Me 109. Source: Wiki

The Need of the NDH Air Force

Following the collapse of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, the NDH began organizing its newly created armed forces. Its air force was created on the 19th of April, 1941. Immediately, work began on creating an adequate structural organization, acquiring manpower, and procuring equipment. Initially, plans for arming this Air Force were ambitious and included acquiring the newest German aircraft design. For example, the main fighter aircraft was to be the Me 109E. A single fighter group would consist of 22 such aircraft. The Germans on the other hand decided to ignore this request, as these planes were needed for the upcoming invasion of the Soviet Union. They also did not fully trust the NDH officials. As a compromise, the NDH air force was to be equipped with the stockpiles of captured Yugoslavian aircraft. The Germans, once again disappointed in the state of their air force, gave the NDH only those aircraft that were mostly obsolete while transferring the better aircraft, like the Hurricanes, to Romania instead.

Prior to the war the Kingdom of Yugoslavia operated a number of modern Me 109E fighters. Despite the NDH’s constant requests to the Germans to deliver at least some of these nothing came of this. Source:  www.paluba.info

Under German Command

While the Germans did not provide the NDH with the Me 109, the Croatian pilots still got the chance to fly on them. While receiving no major import of equipment from their ally, the NDH still wanted to have a good relationship with the Germans. When the massive invasions on the Soviet Union were launched, while the NDH did not directly participate in this attack, its government issued a proclamation for volunteers at the start of July 1941. It called for volunteers among the Croatian population to join the German Army. The NDH Air Force also contributed to this voluntary enlisting. While it lacked equipment, it did not have shortages of personnel willing to go and fight the Soviets.  For this purpose, the 4th Air Force Regiment was formed. It consisted of the 4th Air Force Fighter Group and the 5th Air Force Bomber Group. The 4th Group had in total over 200 members. Once assembled, the fighter group was transported to Furth in Germany where their training was to commence. The training officially began on the 19th of July 1941. For this purpose, the Germans provided some Bu 133, Ar 96, and even some older Me 109D planes. During the training process, one pilot was killed in an accident. During this period the 4th Group was divided into two newly created 10th and 11th squadrons

At the end of September 1941, elements from the 10th Squadron were sent to fight on the Eastern Front. They arrived on the 6th of October and were allocated to the Jagdgeschwader (Eng. Fighter wing) 52. They were to pilot five allocated Me 109Es, with six more being expected to arrive later. Their first combat flight mission occurred on the 9th of October.  They were patrolling the area around Ahtijevka-Krasnograd when the unit spotted a lone Soviet aircraft. It was engaged and shot down by a German pilot who served as a liaison officer in this unit. The following month saw the unit mainly tasked with patrolling and protecting the German airfields in this region. On the 2nd of November, the first air victory was achieved by Croatian pilots. Seven days later another victory was scored. On the 16th of November, the German liaison officer  Lieutenant Baumgarten managed to achieve another victory. He died two days later when he collided in mid-air with a Soviet Aircraft. At the end of November, a Soviet I-16 fighter was shot down. At the start of the following month, the first Croatian pilot, Ivan Karner, lost his life in an accident.

During December they were stationed in the Azov area. During January, pilots from this unit managed to shoot down some 23 Soviet aircraft. By April 1942, 12 more enemy aircraft were shot down over the Kerch Peninsula. In May, the whole unit was renamed to Jagdgruppe Džal (Eng. Fighter Group Džal) which was a common thing for the Germans to name particular military groups for their commanders, in this case, Colonel Franjo Džal. By that time the unit operated the older Me 109E and requested the delivery of newer models. In July 1942, the first Me 109G-2 version began to reach this unit. July and August were quite successful for the Croatian pilots who achieved many air victories, some 137 at that point, against various types of Soviet aircraft, despite being used mainly for support missions.

The Croatian pilots returned to the NDH at the end of 1942 for rest and recuperation. By this point, they had achieved 164 confirmed air victories over 3,300 flights. The best fighter ace of this unit was Cvitan Galić who was credited with 24 air victories, plus 7 more that were not confirmed. The unit was not without casualties as six pilots were lost.  After a few months spent resting, they returned to the Soviet Union in February 1943. They were stationed in Crimea and saw heavy action there. Interestingly they encountered Allied-supplied Spitfires and P-39s. While they continued bringing down many more Soviet pilots, the rapid deterioration on the frontlines caused some of these pilots to second-guess their place in the war. In May and June, at least three pilots defected to the Soviet Union. Fearing that more would follow, the Germans prohibited any further flights by Croatian pilots. The unit commander was temporarily removed from this post but reinstated later in September 1943. In late October more combat flight patrols with new pilots were initiated. The 4th Group in October had only 8 fully operational aircraft.

The 4th Group mainly operated the Me 109E with a better model arriving later into the war. Source: www.destinationsjourney.com
In July 1942 first Me 109G-2 fighter versions began to reach this unit, followed by many more different versions. Source; T. Likso and D. Čanak The Croatian Air Force In The Second World War

This unit would remain active on the Eastern Front in 1944. In September 1944, two more pilots defected to the Soviet Side, forcing the Germans to once again forbid the remaining Croatian pilots from flying. In November, the unit was disbanded and its personnel received infantry training.  In early 1945 these saw action as standard infantry in Poland. After March 1945 those that survived were sent back to the NDH. In total the 4th Group that served over four years on the Eastern Front was credited with the destruction of over 300 enemy aircraft.

Despite being a small unit the 4th Squadron pilots managed to claim 300 enemy aircraft. Source: T. Likso and D. Čanak The Croatian Air Force In The Second World War

In NDH service

It was not until early 1945 that the first Me 109 began to arrive in the NDH itself. These included the G-6, 14, and 10 variants. These aircraft were acquired for the 4th Fighter Group (11th and 12th Squadrons). While nominally part of the NDH Air Force, the 4th Fighter Group was actually under the direct control of the Germans. While 15 aircraft were to be delivered, 5 of them never reached Croatia as they were lost during the transit. These numbers are according to T. Likso and D. Čanak. (The Croatian Air Force In The Second World War). However, both authors expressed their doubts about the precise number of delivered aircraft. They believe that that number was actually higher and that more than 15 aircraft were delivered.

Author V. V. Mikić (Zrakoplovstvo Nezavisne Države Hrvatske 1941-1945) gives a different account. According to him, some 30 Me 109s were allocated to the NDH service. The first 10 aircraft arrived at the end of November 1944. The second group of 10 aircraft reached NDH  at the end of 1944. The last 10 were to arrive in January 1945. On transit flight two of them accidentally collided, with one more benign heavily damaged during the landing.

In The Balkans 

Given that these fighters arrived late into the war, there is little surviving documentation that mentions their use in combat. In March, two Me 109s were used to attack a partisan airfield Smrdan but without any success.

During March and April 1945, some of these newly arrived aircraft were used for crew training.  These flights mainly lasted between 10 to 15 minutes, and the older Me 109G-6 was used for this purpose. On the 26th of March, and later on the 2nd of April, ground attacks against Partisan-held airfields were made.

By 1945, defections from the NDH’s forces became a common occurrence, and they were having a hard time keeping the Army intact. The Air Force was not an exception to this, as its pilots often managed to escape either to the Allies in Italy, or the Yugoslav Partisans. On the 16th of April 1945, while flying a patrol mission, two Me 109s escaped to Italy and surrendered to the Allies. These were piloted by Josip Ceković, flying aMe 109G-10, and Vladimir Sandtner, in a Me 109G-14. The first pilot escaped to Falconara and the latter to Ancona. Allegedly, these two fighters had acted as a guard to a secret NDH delegation that was to fly to Italy and ask the Allies for peace, and possibly even switch sides.

In late April 1945 pilot Josip Ceković while flying a Me 109G-10 escaped to Falconara in Italy and surrendered to the Allies. Source: www.britmodeller.com

Two more pilots deserted with their aircraft, both flying Me 109G-10s, on the 20th of April. These were part of a group of four Me 109s that were tasked with attacking Partisan ground targets. Instead, two pilots defected and flew to the city of Mostar, which was at that time in Partisan hands. They were immediately put into partisan service after the NDH symbols were repainted. On the 7th of May, they saw action against the retreating Axis ground forces.

On the 23rd of April 1945 while on patrol, two NDH Me 109s spotted two Allied  P-51s. The Me 109 pilots managed to fly at a close range of some 80 meters and opened fire. One of the P-51s caught fire, and while the pilot tried to escape a second burst of cannon fire from the Me 109 brought it down. They were intercepted by two more P-51s. The NDH aircraft, despite receiving many hits, managed to damage another P-51. As more Allied fighters began to approach this engagement, the Me 109s began to fly away toward their base of operation, managing to escape the pursuers.

The few remaining Me 109s were used in the last days of the war. They tried to defend the Axis positions at the Sermian Front in the Eastern part of Croatia. This was a vital defense line for the remaining Axis Forces that was for some time besieged by the advancing Partisans. During this time, the Me 109 participated in a few skirmishes with the Partisan-operated Yak fighters. The NDH Me 109s generally avoided direct fights as they were severely outnumbered.

In the last days of the war, many of the Me 109 escaped to Austria. It is believed that up to 17 aircraft made this flight, and they were left abandoned, later to be put to use by the advancing Partisans

Camo and markings

The NDH Me 109s were left in German late time war-type camouflages. This usually consisted of  Dunkelgrun (Eng. Dark green) and Grau  (Eng. Grey) on the upper aircraft surfaces, and  Hellblau (Eng. Sky Blue) on the lower surfaces. A yellow-painted ring followed the black nose. To the rear, the usually yellow-painted band that goes around the fuselage was repainted in green. A standard Croatian white and red checkerboard coat of arms was painted on the tail unit. Starting from 24th February 1945 the NDH Air Force introduced the use of a black trefoil that was painted on the aircraft fuselage sides or wings.

A good view of the NDH Me 109 side view, notice the large black trefoil that was painted on the aircraft fuselage sides or wings. Source: falkeeins.blogspot.com

Technical Specification

The Bf 109 was a low-wing, all-metal, single-seat fighter. To keep the production of this aircraft as simple as possible, Messerschmitt engineers decided to develop a monocoque fuselage that was divided into two halves. These halves would be placed together and connected using simple flush rivets, thus creating a simple base on which remaining components, like the engine, wings, and instruments would be installed.

In order to provide room for the retracting landing gear, Messerschmitt intentionally used only a single wing spar which was positioned quite to the rear of the wing. This spar had to be sufficiently strong to withstand the load forces that acted on the wings during flight. The wings were connected to the fuselage by four strong bolts. This design enables the wings to have a rather simple overall construction with the added benefit of being cheap to produce. During the Bf 109’s later service life, the damaged wings could be simply replaced with others on hand. The wings were also very thin, which provided the aircraft with better overall control at lower speeds but also reduced drag which in turn increased the overall maximum speed

The cockpit was placed in the center of the fuselage. It was a fully enclosed compartment that was riveted to the fuselage. The Bf 109 cockpit itself was quite cramped. The Me 109 possessed quite an unusual landing gear arrangement. The landing gear was mainly connected to the lower center base of the fuselage, which meant that the majority of the weight of the aircraft would be centered at this point. The two landing gear struts retracted outward towards the wings.

As the production of this aircraft went on for years, various modifications and improvements were carried out to improve the flight performance. This included its overall shape, engine, armament, and instrumentation. For example, the Me 109B-1 which was introduced before the outbreak of the war in Europe, was powered by a 635 hp Jumo 210D engine and armed with three 7.92 mm MG 17 machine guns

The later Me 109G-6 which was introduced to service in early 1943 was powered by a much stronger  1,475 hp DB605A engine. In addition, the armament was improved with either one 30 mm (1.18 in), or two 20 mm (0.78 in) cannons and additional two 13 mm (0.51 in) machine guns  It was a mass-produced fighter aircraft that stayed in service up to the end of the war. There were several sub-variants of the G-6 some of which were the R-2 reconnaissance, R-3 with larger fuel load, and R-6 with stronger armament in the wings.

The G-14 variant incorporated some minor changes mainly intended to standardize some parts of the Me 109 series. This includes using the erla haube type canopy, a larger tail fin, and standardized the use of methanol-water injection. The G-14 was an attempt to consolidate all of the modifications that had accumulated with the G-6 into a common variant, the G-10 was converted from old airframes to get the newer DB 605D engine into service faster.

The G-10 (essentially modified G-14/G-6) was an attempt to increase the overall flight speed and high-altitude performance by introducing the new DB 605D engine equipped with a larger supercharger. In addition, this variant received several modifications such as a reinforced, lengthened tail wheel strut, using wider front wheels, somewhat larger wings, etc. It was introduced to service in late 1944 and saw relatively limited combat action due to this.

Conclusion

The Me 109 was the best NDH fighter during the war. Unfortunately for the NDH, these began to arrive at the end of 1944. It is way too late and in too few numbers to have any meaningful impact on the war in Yugoslavia. Lack of fuel, the Allied air supremacy, and the rapidly collapsing Axis resistance meant that these stood little chance to effectively fight back.

Me 109G-6 Specifications

Wingspans 9,92 m / 32  ft 6  in
Length 9 m / 29 ft 7  in
Height 2.6 m / 8  ft 6  in
Wing Area 16.2 m² / 175 ft²
Engine One 1,475 hp DB605 AM
Empty Weight 2,700 kg / 5,950  lbs
Maximum Take-off Weight 3,200 kg / 7,055  lbs
Maximum Speed 620 km/h / 373 mph
Range 600 km / 620 miles
Maximum Service Ceiling 11,550m / 37,895 ft
Crew 1 pilot
Armament
  • One 30 mm (1.18 in), or two 20 mm (0.78 in) cannons and two 13 mm (0.51 in) machine guns

Illustration

Credits

  • Written by Marko P.
  • Edited by Henry H.
  • Illustrated by Godzilla

Source:

  • A. Pelletier (2002) French Fighters Of World War II in Action, Squadron/Signal Publication
  • J. R. Beaman (1983) Messerschmitt  Bf 109 in action part 2, Squadron publication
  • V. V. Mikić, (2000) Zrakoplovstvo Nezavisne Države Hrvatske 1941-1945, Vojno  istorijski institut Vojske Jugoslavije.
  • T. Likso and Danko Č. (1998) The Croatian Air Force In The Second World War, Nacionalna Sveučilišna Zagreb
  • J. R. Smith and A. L. Kay (1990) German Aircraft of the Second World War, Putnam
  • D. Monday (2006) The Hamlyn Concise Guide To Axis Aircraft OF World War II, Bounty Books
  • C. Chants (2007) Aircraft of World War II, Grange Books.

 

 

 

 

Re.2000 (J20) In Swedish Service

sweden flag Sweden (1941)
Fighter – 60 Aircraft

To protect their airspace as the Second World war ravaged Europe, Sweden wanted to acquire more modern fighters. Initially, they purchased American fighters, but the few they could order  were insufficient and would be soon out of date. Luckily for Sweden,  Italy was in short supply of vital metal ore, so it was that the Swedish Air Force managed to acquire 60 Re.2000 fighters. These were immediately put to service and proved to be the best fighters that Sweden had in its inventory during the war.

J20 (Re.2000) in Swedish service. Source: www.destinationsjourney.com

History

As the war in Europe broke out in 1939, Sweden tried to use its geopolitical and geographic position to remain neutral. Despite its neutral position, it still needed to acquire weapons and other pieces of military equipment to protect its border in case of any potential attack. Just as the war in Europe started,  Sweden’s military officials purchased 120 P-35 Seversky fighters from the US to strengthen its air force. The first contingent of 60 aircraft reached Sweden in early 1940. The second group never reached Sweden, as the US Government canceled this agreement.

Despite ordering 120 P-35 Seversky fighters only half that number ever reached Sweden. Source: comandosupremo.com

The Swedish Armed Forces, not wanting to be left defenseless against an enemy air force, instead approached the Italians. Luckily for them, the Italians had developed and produced the Re.2000 which was essentially an improved copy of the US P-35. The Swedish government requested the purchase of 60 aircraft of this type. The official agreement was signed on the 28th of November 1940. As payment, Sweden agreed to give the Italians vital ore resources such as chrome and nickel.

Through Italy, Sweden managed to acquire 60 Re.2000 fighter aircraft in 1941. Source:www.destinationsjourney.com

Re.2000 Brief Development History 

In 1938, the development of the Re.2000 by Reggiane began at the request of the Italian Aviation Ministry. The Italian Air Force at that time wanted to introduce more modern, low-wing fighters. By then, several different fighter designs were in various states of development. Reggiane formed a team of engineers with the aim of creating such a fighter, led by the Technical Director Antonio Alessio, and Engineer Roberto Longhi. Due to a lack of time to design an aircraft from the ground up, a solution was made to utilize some elements of the design of the US Seversky P-35. The main reason why the Re.2000 was influenced by this US design was Roberto Longhi. He had spent some time working in the aviation industry in America before returning to Italy in 1936. While the two planes look very similar, there were some differences, like the cockpit, and landing gear. Due to the lack of interest of the Italian Air Force Officials, fewer than 170 aircraft of this type would be produced. Most were exported, and only small quantities of this fighter were ever operated by the Italian Air Force.

 

Italian Re.2000 fighter. Source: www.warbirdphotographs

In Swedish service 

The first Re.2000 reached Sweden in 1941. It was disassembled and then transported by rail through Germany and finally to Sweden. Once there, it was transported to the Swedish Air Force central workshop at Malment to be reassembled, after which the first trial and evaluation flights were carried out in September 1941. Once all 60 arrived, these were allocated to the F 10 Kung. Skanska Flyglottiljen (Eng. Fighter wing) unit. Their primary base of operation was the airfields at Bulltofta and Rinkaby. In Swedish Service, the Re.2000s were renamed to J20. The ‘J’ stands for Jacktplan, meaning a fighter. These received serial numbers from 2301 to 2360. The last two digits of these numbers were painted (in white color) on the aircraft tails and engine.

In general, the overall flight performance of the J20 was deemed sufficient. Its greatest downside was its poor mechanical reliability, and the difficulty in maintaining its engine. The Italians never tested the Re.2000’s performance in a cold climate, as it was intended for service in the Mediterranean. Because of this, the Swedish maintenance crews had to find out the hard way that the aircraft was simply not suited for the cold climate in the North. Trouble starting the engine in cold weather would prove a common, and frustrating exercise.

The J20 mainly saw service in the role of the interceptor. Their job was to intercept any aircraft that came near Sweden’s airspace. These were in the majority of cases, damaged Allied aircraft that were returning from bombing raids in  Germany. On rare occasions, some German aircraft would lose their way and be intercepted by the J20. The interception operations were not intended to engage incoming aircraft but to simply escort them to the Bulltofta airfield, where the plane and its crew would be interred.

During the war, some 16 J20s were lost in various accidents but only one was shot down in combat. During a routine patrol on the 3rd of April 1945, a J20 piloted by Erik Nordlund spotted a German Do 24 aircraft that was flying near Nahobukten. As the J20 approached the German plane it was hit by 2 cm cannon rounds. While the pilot disengaged and tried to fly back, the engine exploded in midair, destroying the aircraft and killing the pilot. The J20s that survived the war remained in the inventory of the Sweden Air Force up to 1955 before being finally removed from service.

Besides their national marking, the Swedish added two large two-digit designations to the J20. These large numbers were painted in white color. Source: www.destinationsjourney.com

Surviving aircrafts

Most were either lost or scrapped, and today, only one J20 is preserved. It is currently exhibited at the Swedish Air Force Museum at Linkoping.

The preserved Swedish J20 fighter (serial number 2340). Source: plasticfantastique.com

Technical characteristics

The Re.2000 was designed as a low-wing, mixed-construction, single-seat fighter plane. The fuselage consisted of a round frame covered with a metal sheet held in place using flush-riveting. The Re.2000 wings had a semi-elliptical design, with five spars covered with stressed skin. The central part of the wing held two integral fuel tanks. The tail section had a metal construction with the controls covered with fabric.

The landing gear system was unusual. When it retracted, it rotated 90° (a copy from the Curtiss model) before it entered the wheel bays. For better landing handling, the landing gear was provided with hydraulic shock absorbers and pneumatic brakes. The smaller rear wheel was also retractable and could be steered.

The Re.2000 engine was the Piaggio P.XI R.C.40 14-cylinder air-cooled radial engine, providing 985 hp, equipped with a three-blade variable pitch propeller made by Piaggio.

The cockpit canopy opened to the rear and the pilot had a good overall view of the surroundings. For pilot protection, a 8 mm (0.3 in) thick armor plate was placed behind the seat.

The Re.2000 possessed weak offensive capabilities, as it was armed with only two Breda-Safat 12.7 mm (0.5 in) heavy machine guns. The machine guns were installed in the forward front fuselage and fired through the propeller arc. For each machine gun, 300 ammunition rounds were provided. The Re.2000 also had two small bomb bays placed in each central wing section. Each bomb bay had a payload of twenty-two 2 kg (4.4 lb) anti-personnel or incendiary bombs.

Conclusion

The J20 was the best fighter in service within the Swedish Air Force. It was noted that during its service it possessed good overall flight characteristics. There were several issues with its maintenance, but this was mainly attributed to the cold Scandinavian Climate.  In conclusion, while not the best fighter of the Second World War, for the country as Sweden it was more than enough to protect its airspace.

Re.2000 Specifications  

Wingspans 11 m  / 36 ft
Length 8 m  / 26 ft 5 in
Height 3.15 m  / 10 ft 4 in
Wing Area 20.4 m² /  220 ft²
Engine One Piaggio P.XI RC.40 985 hp
Empty Weight 2,460 kg   / 5,424  lbs
Maximum Takeoff Weight 3,240 kg   / 7,140  lbs
Climb Rate to 6 km 6 minutes 10 seconds
Maximum Speed 515 km/h  / 320 mph
Cruising speed 450 km/h / 280 mph
Range 840 km / 520 miles
Maximum Service Ceiling 11,500 m /  34,450 ft
Crew 1 pilot
Armament
  • Two 0.5 in (12.7 mm) heavy machine guns
  • 44 kg bombs
Swedish J 20 (Re.2000) with 42 marking number

Credits:

  • Written by Marko P.
  • Edited by Henry H.
  • Illustration by Pavel

Source:

  • G. Punka (2001) Reggiane Fighters in Action, Squadron/signal publication
  • D. Nešić  (2008)  Naoružanje Drugog Svetsko Rata-Italija. Beograd.
  • D. Monday (2006) The Hamlyn Concise Guide To Axis Aircraft OF World War II, Bounty Books
  • M. D. Terlizzi. (2002). Reggiane Re 2000: Falco, Heja, J.20. IBN
  • G. Cattaneo () The Reggiane Re.2000, Profile Publication

 

A7He1 (He 112) in Japanese Service

Empire of Japan (1937)
Fighter Aircraft – Number Operated 30

During the war with China, the Japanese Air Forces encountered enemy fighters that were much better than what they currently had in their inventory. As their modern fighters were either under development or only available in limited numbers, they tried to acquire new fighters from aboard.  The options for acquiring such fighters were rather limited, and the Japanese turned to the Germans for a solution. This came in the form of 30 He 112 known in Japanese service as the A7He1.

The He 112 in Japanese service. Source: D. Bernard Heinkel He 112 in Action

A brief He 112 history

Before the Second World War, the Luftwaffe was in need of a new and modern fighter that was to replace the older biplane fighters in service, such as the Arado Ar 68 and Heinkel He 51.  For this reason, in May 1934 the RLM issued a competition for a new and modern fighter plane. While four companies responded to this request, only the designs from Heinkel and Messerschmitt were deemed sufficient. The Heinkel He 112 was a good design that offered generally acceptable flight characteristics and possessed a good basis for further improvements. The Bf 109 on the other hand had slightly better overall flight performance and was much simpler and cheaper to build. Given the fact that the Germans were attempting to accelerate the production of the new fighter, this was seen as a huge advantage over the He 112. Ultimately it would not be accepted for service, and only 100 or so aircraft would be built. These would be mainly sold abroad, with those remaining in Germany used for various testing and evaluation purposes.

He 112 the unsuccessful competitor of the Bf 109. Source: www.luftwaffephotos.com

While the He 112 project was canceled by the RLM, to compensate for the huge investment in resources and time into it, Heinkel was permitted to export this aircraft. A number of countries such as Austria, Japan, Romania, and Finland showed interest, but only a few actually managed to procure this aircraft, and even then, only in limited numbers.

Attempts to make a deal with Japan 

In 1937 a war between Japan and China broke out. While Japan had a better-equipped and more organized army, it faced stiff resistance. The Chinese were supported by the Soviet Union which supplied them with weapons and equipment, including aircraft. These caused huge concern within the Imperial Japanese Navy. Their newest fighters were either present only in small numbers or were still under development. As a temporary solution, IJN officials decided to approach Germany for assistance in the hope of acquiring new fighters.

For this reason, a military delegation was dispatched to Germany in the Autumn of 1937. Despite its later known fame, the German Air Force at that time was still in its early stage of rebuilding and realistically did not have much to offer, being in need of modern fighters themselves.  This would come in the form of the Messerschmitt Me 109. Its competing Heinkel He 112 lost the competition but was allowed to be sold abroad if anyone was interested. It was probably for this reason that the Japanese delegation visited the Heinkel factory at Marienehe. There they had the choice to observe the He 112 V9 aircraft. They were generally satisfied with what they saw and placed an initial order for 30 He 112Bs. If these proved to be as good as they hoped they would be, another, larger order for 100 more aircraft was to be given. As a confirmation of this agreement, the Japanese delegation returned with one He 112 aircraft that was to be used for familiarization and evaluation.

One of the 30 He 112 sold to Japan in 1938, Source: D. Bernard Heinkel He 112 in Action

Naming Scheme

As this aircraft was expected to enter service, it was designated as A7He1 by the IJN. The capital ‘A’ stands as a designation for a fighter. The number ‘7’ represents that this aircraft was to supersede the type 6 designation fighter. He stands for the Heinkel, and lastly the ‘1’ stands for the first variant of this type.  The Allied intelligence services discovered its existence within the IJP and awarded it the code name Jerry. 

Testing In Japan

Four aircraft arrived in 1937, and the last one arrived at the end of 1938. As the first aircraft began to arrive, the IJN began testing the A7He1’s performance in contrast to other fighters that they had in inventory, namely the Mitsubishi A5M2. While the A7He1 proved to be some 65 km/h faster, in other regards such as climbing speed and general maneuverability it proved equal or even worse than the Japanese fighter.  The Japanese were not satisfied with the A7He1 engine which was deemed too complex. These factors ultimately led the commission which examined it to propose that it should not be adopted, nor that any further orders should be given. After the arrival of the last A7He1, the order for an additional 100 aircraft was canceled.

Ultimate Fate 

As the A7He1 was not adopted for service, the IJN had to decide what to do with the 30 aircraft. They still represent a financial investment that could not be simply discarded. Some of these were allocated to various research institutes for future studies and evaluation, the remainder were given to training schools. None were ever used operationally in combat either in China or in the Pacific.

Quite surprisingly given their age and the rather limited numbers that were acquired, a few He1 survived the war and were captured by the Allies. One example was found in Atsugi airfield near Honshu in early October 1945. Unfortunately, the fate of these captured aircraft is not known but they were likely scrapped at some point after the war.

Despite the limited number of acquired aircraft, some of them survived the war and were later captured by the Allies. Source: www.destinationsjourney.com
Another aircraft (on the left) is being photographed by the Allied soldiers. It is possible that it was the same aircraft as in the previous photograph just taken later when it was being scraped. Source: www.destinationsjourney.com

Technical Characteristics

The He 112 was an all-metal single-engine fighter. The monocoque fuselage consisted of a metal base covered by riveted stress metal sheets. The wing was slightly gulled, with the wingtips bending upward, and had the same construction as the fuselage with a combination of metal construction covered in stressed metal sheets.

During its development life, a great number of engines were tested on the He 112. For the main production version, the He 112 B-2, the 700 hp Jumo 210G liquid-cooled engine was used, and some were equipped with the  680 hp Jumo 210E engine. The He 112 had a fuel capacity of 101 liters in two wing-mounted tanks, with a third 115-liter tank placed under the pilot’s seat.

The landing gear was more or less standard in design. They consisted of two larger landing wheels that retracted into the wings and one semi-retractable tail wheel. The He 112 landing gear was wide enough to provide good ground handling and stability during take-off or landing.

The cockpit received a number of modifications. Initially, it was open with a simple windshield placed in front of the pilot. Later models had a sliding canopy that was either partially or fully glazed.

While the armament was changed during the He 112’s production, the last series was equipped with two 7.92 mm MG 17 machine guns and two 2 cm Oerlikon MG FF cannons. The ammunition load for each machine gun was 500 rounds, with 60 rounds each for the cannons. If needed, two bomb racks could be placed under the wings.

Conclusion

While the He 112 was often portrayed as a modern fighter, from the Japanese point of view it proved to be disappointing in any case. While expecting a potentially effective fighter that was better with everything they had, the He 112 proved to be quite the opposite. After the 30 aircraft arrived no further orders were given. This only serves to prove that the old saying the grass is always greener on the other side is correct once in a while.

He 112B-2 Specifications

Wingspans 29  ft 10  in / 9.1 m
Length 30  ft 2 in / 9.22 m
Height 12 ft 7 in  / 3.82  m
Wing Area 180  ft² / 17 m²
Engine One 700 hp Jumo 210G liquid-cooled engine
Empty Weight 3,570  lbs / 1,620 kg
Maximum Take-off Weight 4,960 lbs / 2,250 kg
Climb Rate to 6 km In 10 minutes
Maximum Speed 317 mph / 510 km/h
Cruising speed 300 mph / 484 km/h
Range 715 miles / 1,150 km
Maximum Service Ceiling 31,170 ft / 9,500 m
Crew 1 pilot
Armament
  • Two 20 mm (1.8 in) cannons and two machine guns  7.92 mm (0.31 in) machine guns and 60 kg bombs

 

He 112 v5 as it was tested by Japan

Credits

  • Written by Marko P.
  • Edited by  Henry H.
  • Illustrations by Godzilla

Source:

  • Duško N. (2008)  Naoružanje Drugog Svetsko Rata-Nemаčaka. Beograd
  • J. R. Smith and A. L. Kay (1990) German Aircraft of the Second World War, Putnam
  • D. Monday (2006) The Hamlyn Concise Guide To Axis Aircraft OF World War II, Bounty Books
  • D. Bernard (1996) Heinkel He 112 in Action, Signal Publication
  • R.S. Hirsch, U, Feist and H. J. Nowarra (1967) Heinkel 100, 112, Aero Publisher
  • C. Chants (2007) Aircraft of World War II, Grange Books.
  • https://airpages.ru/eng/lw/he112_combat_use.shtml

 

MS 406 in Croatian Service

Independent State of Croatia flag Independent State of Croatia (1943-1945)
Fighter –  36 to 46 Operated

During the Second World War, the German puppet state the Nezavisna Država Hrvatska NDH (Eng. Independent State of Croatia), tried to develop its own Air Force. Unfortunately for them, its German and Italian allies simply did not have the industrial resources, nor spare planes to allow them to build a significant air force. Still, the NDH’s persistence in asking for such equipment paid off in 1944 when they received over 30 captured French MS 406 fighters.

The Morane-Saulnier MS 406 in NDH service. Source: T. Likso and Danko Č. The Croatian Air Force In The Second World War

History

After Italy’s unsuccessful invasion of Greece, Benito Mussolini was forced to ask his German ally for help. Adolf Hitler agreed to assist, fearing that a possible Allied attack through the Balkans would reach Romania and its vital oil fields. In the path of the German advance towards Greece stood Yugoslavia, whose government initially agreed to join the Axis side. This agreement was short-lived, as the Yugoslav government was overthrown by an anti-Axis pro-Allied military coup at the end of March 1941. Hitler immediately gave an order for the preparation of the invasion of Yugoslavia. The war that began on 6th April 1941, sometimes called the April War, was a short one and ended with a Yugoslav defeat, and the division of its territory between the Axis powers.

With the collapse of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, Croatia, with German aid, was finally able to declare independence, albeit becoming a fascist puppet state. It was officially formed on the 10th of April 1941. The new state received a significant territorial expansion by annexing most of western Yugoslavia, including Bosnia, parts of Serbia, and Montenegro.

While the conquest of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia proved to be an easy task for the Axis, holding these territories proved to be much more difficult. This was mainly due to two resistance movements that were actively engaged in sabotage, destroying railways and bridges, and attacking isolated occupation units’ positions and strong points. Despite attempts to suppress these attacks, the resistance movements, especially the Communist Partisans, grew rapidly, forcing the Germans and their Allies to introduce ever-larger occupation forces. The NDH forces were especially targeted as they committed mass murders and deportations to concentration camps. Thanks to the German help, they managed to form a small Air Force that in its inventory consisted of all kinds of obsolete, and in rarer cases, new equipment. By 1943, it was in the process of reorganization and the NDH officials during this time often asked their German overlords for more modern aircraft. Sometimes they even portrayed their own Air Force as weaker than it was.

The NDH Air Force was particularly poorly equipped with fighter aircraft. Luckily for them, the Germans at that time occupied what remained of Vichy France, capturing all kinds of military equipment. This also included the MS 406 fighters which was agreed to be sent to NDH by the end of 1943.

A Brief MS 406  History

At the start of the Second World War, the Morane-Saulnier MS 406 was one of the more modern French fighters built using metal components whose development began in mid-1930s. The first prototype under the designation MS 405 made its maiden test flight on the 8th of August 1935. Following successful testing and good performance, the French Ministry of Aviation issued a request for the first 50 aircraft in February 1938. Given the rising tension in Europe at that time the order was eventually increased to an additional 825 aircraft to be built. By the time, the French surrendered to the Germans over 1,000 aircraft of this type were built.

French Morane-Saulnier MS 406 fighter. Source: Wiki

The MS 406 was a good design that was nearly equal to the German Bf 109 models near the start of the war. During the War with the Germans in 1940, the MS 406 managed to achieve some success against the Germans but ultimately proved incapable of stopping the enemy. Some 300 aircraft of this type would be lost during this brief war, either due to the action of enemy fighters, ground anti-aircraft fire, or accidents. The MS 406 also achieved some success on the foreign market with 12 being sold to China, 30 to Finland, and the Swiss obtained a license for production. Poland also expressed interest in acquiring 150 aircraft of this type but nothing came of this as a result of the German invasion that began in September 1939.

In NDH service

The precise number of available MS 406 or the date when they arrived is not clear.  According to A. Pelletier ( French Fighters Of World War II in Action) the NDH received 46 MS 406 in early 1943. Author V. V. Mikić ( Zrakoplovstvo Nezavisne Države Hrvatske 1941-1945) on the other hand mentioned a lower number of 38 which began to arrive at the end of 1943 and early 1944. These aircraft received registration numbers from 2301 to 2338.  According to T. Likso and D. Čanak (The Croatian Air Force In Second World War) between 36 to 38 were sent to the NDH during 1944.

In late 1943, these aircraft, together with Italian-supplied Fiat G.50s, were to be used to equip the 11th Group consisting of three squadrons (21st, 22nd, and 23rd). The MS 406s were expected to arrive at the start of 1944. The first operational units were to be formed by mid-February. To help train the pilots, one Seiman 200 and ex-Yugoslav P.V.T aircraft were to be supplied. The training operations were carried out at Lučko airfield, starting from October 1943.

Once in Croatia, the MS 406 was used together with the Fiat G.50 fighter aircraft. Source: Wiki

The situation in the air and the ground significantly worsened for NDH at the start of 1944. It was especially hard-pressed as the Allies began bombing operations in occupied Yugoslavia. Thanks to their advances in Italy, they managed to set up many air bases from which these attacks could be launched. They bombed many military installations including ammunition depots, fuel production facilities, and NDH airfields.

An NDH MS 406 w heavily damaged during one of many Allied bombing attacks. The aircraft while damaged beyond repair was not written off, as it was used to cannibalize any usable spare parts. Source: T. Likso and D. Čanak The Croatian Air Force In The Second World War

On the 5th or 6th of April 1944, the Lazužani airfield where the NDH 5th Air  Base was located was bombed by the Allied 2nd SAAF Squadron. They managed to completely destroy 11 and damage 20 more aircraft. One MS 406 was destroyed when an Allied bomb landed next to it. The pilot Cvitan Galić did not survive the explosion. The loss in material was such that the 23rd Lovačko Jato was disbanded. Another MS 406 was lost during a second Allied bombing run on Borongaj and Lučko air bases that occurred on the 12th of April 1944.

In March 1944 Hrvatska Zrakoplovna Legija HZL (Eng. Croatian Air Force Legion) arrived at the NDH capital Zagreb. This unit was formed way back in 1941 and was in direct control by the Germans. Its pilots participated under German controls on the Eastern Front and were quite experienced. The Germans demanded that at least two MS 406s be given to this unit to be used as training aircraft. The NDH officials could do little not to comply.

By 15th September 1944, there were 19 available MS 406 aircraft. Of this number only 7 were fully operational. On September 18th, or on the night of the 21st the sources are not clear, the Partisan forces managed to capture an NDH airfield near Banja Luka. Some 30 ,or 11 depending on the source, aircraft stationed there were captured. The NDH personnel either joined the Partisans or fled leaving behind valuable equipment and supplies. The Partisans managed to capture 3 MS 406 fighters, two were under repair. These were used against their former owners, but one was damaged in an accident and was written off.

In late 1944, the few surviving MS 406 were used in desperate attempts to stop the victorious Partisans forces that were liberating Yugoslavia from the Axis occupiers. By this point, the NDH Air Force could do little to stop them given the chronic lack of fuel. Unfortunately, the precise information about the fate of many NDH aircraft in the last few months of the war was not recorded well. While the Partisans managed to capture a few MS 406 their use was limited at best, and unfortunately, none of them is known to have survived the war.

An MS 406duirng the winter of 1944. Source: T. Likso and D. Čanak The Croatian Air Force In The Second World War

Camo and markings

The MS 406 appears to have been left in German late time war type camouflage. This usually consisted of  Dunkelgrun (Eng. Dark green) and Grau  (Eng. Grey) on the upper aircraft surfaces, and  Hellblau (Eng. Sky Blue) on the lower surfaces. A standard Croatian white and red checkerboard coat of arms was painted on the wings and the fuselage sides. Starting from 24th February 1945 the NDH Air Force introduced the use of a black trefoil that was painted on the aircraft fuselage sides.

Near the end of the war, the NDH Air Force introduced the use of a black trefoil that was painted on the aircraft fuselage sides. Source: https://ww2aircraft.net/forum/threads/morane-saulnier-ms-406.50613/page-2

Technical Specification

The MS 406 was designed as a low-wing mix-construction fighter.  Its designers went for a conventional construction aircraft design. The fuselage frame was made using aluminum tubes connected and covered with Plymax. This is a  composite material that consists of layers of aluminum and plywood. The wings were constructed using a combination of spars and steel tubes also covered in this material. It was powered by one 860 hp Hispano-Suiza liquid-cooled engine. Most produced aircraft used a three-bladed two-pitch propeller, while some received variable-pitch propellers. The armament consisted of one 20 mm (0.78 in) Hispano-Suiza S9 cannon and two 7.5 mm (0.29 in) MAC 1934 machine guns. The cannon fired through the propeller shaft.  The total ammunition load for the cannon was 60 and for the two machine guns 600 rounds.

Conclusion

The MS 406 was one of the few more modern fighter aircraft that was available in any significant number. But despite that, it was already obsolete and could realistically do little against Allied bombers and fighters. It was mostly used to fight the advancing Partisan formations. Few remaining aircraft were used in this role up to the end of the war.

MS 406  Specifications

Wingspans 10.6 m / 34  ft 10  in
Length 8.13 m / 26 ft 9  in
Height 2.71 m / 8  ft 10  in
Wing Area 17.1 m² / 184 ft²
Engine One 860 hp Hispano-Suiza 12Y-31 liquid-cooled engine
Empty Weight 1,900 kg / 4,190  lbs
Maximum Take-off Weight 2,426 kg / 5,790  lbs
Climb Rate per minute 850 m / 2,790 ft
Maximum Speed 485 km/h / 302 mph
Range 1,000 km / 620 miles
Maximum Service Ceiling 9,400 m / 30,840 ft
Crew 1 pilot
Armament
  • One 20 mm (0.78 in) cannon and two 7.5 mm (0.29 in) machine guns

Illustration

 

Credits

  • Article written by Marko P.
  • Edited by  Henry H.
  • Illustration by Godzilla

Source:

  • A. Pelletier (2002) French Fighters Of World War II in Action, Squadron/Signal Publication
  • Duško N. (2008)  Naoružanje Drugog Svetsko Rata-Francuska. Beograd
  • V. V. Mikić, (2000) Zrakoplovstvo Nezavisne Države Hrvatske 1941-1945, Vojno  istorijski institut Vojske Jugoslavije.
  • T. Likso and Danko Č. (1998) The Croatian Air Force In The Second World War, Nacionalna Sveučilišna Zagreb
  • J. R. Smith and A. L. Kay (1990) German Aircraft of the Second World War, Putnam
  • D. Monday (2006) The Hamlyn Concise Guide To Axis Aircraft OF World War II, Bounty Books
  • T.L. Morosanu and D. A. Melinte Romanian (2010) Fighter Colours 1941-1945 MMP Books
  • D. Bernard (1996) Heinkel He 112 in Action, Signal Publication
  • R.S. Hirsch, U, Feist and H. J. Nowarra (1967) Heinkel 100, 112, Aero Publisher
  • C. Chants (2007) Aircraft of World War II, Grange Books.