Kingdom of Italy/Italian Social Republic (1941-1945) Fighter – Approximately 60 Airframes Received
The Dewoitine D.520 was an advanced French fighter aircraft of the Second World War, which had been employed in large numbers during the Battle of France. After the French Campaign, the German forces captured dozens of Dewoitine D.520s in working order, of which 60 were delivered to the Italian Regia Aeronautica (Royal Air Force) in two separate batches of 30 planes.
Leftovers
Of those, some were never retrieved from the French airports they were left at, and others were disassembled, and cannibalized for spare parts. For these reasons, and the absence of data in Italian official documents, many of their stories have been lost to time.
Prior to being supplied any D.520 by the Luftwaffe, the Italian Regio Esercito (Royal Army) had captured about 30 Dewoitine D.520s during its involvement in the Battle of France. These were almost immediately delivered to the Regia Aeronautica. According to the official documentation, the first three specimens were assigned to 2° Stormo Caccia (Eng: 2nd Fighter Wing), even if it is not clear when they were delivered and to which squadron.
The command of the 2° Stormo was based at the Turin-Mirafiori airport after the 20th of January 1941, with 68 pilots and 119 mechanics, a total of 12 FIAT C.R. 42, and waiting for the new Macchi M.C. 202. For two months, they defended the largest industrial centers in northern Italy, such as Turin, Milan, Genoa, and Savona. At the end of February, the first Macchi M.C. 200 and some CR 42s arrived, bringing the department’s equipment to 62 MC 200s and 22 CR 42s, but with no mention of the Dewoitines.
There appear to have been three D.520s available. Due to a lack of spare parts and 20 mm ammunition (the Hispano-Suiza did not fire the same 20 mm cartridges produced in Italy), these were rarely used by pilots, except for training to fight against the French aircraft.
The remaining Dewoitines captured by Italy were kept at the airports of Montélimar, Orange, Istres, and Aix-en-Provence, and at the Toulouse factory until the beginning of 1943, when some Italian pilots, including Pilot Sergeant Luigi Gorrini (19 kills and 9 probable) had the task of transferring them to Italy.
Of these new D.520s taken over by the Regia Aeronautica, 8 went to equip the 22° Gruppo Autonomo Caccia Terrestre (22nd Autonomous Terrestrial Fighter Group) in late February 1943 at the airport of Capodichino. The French aircraft were deployed alongside the Macchi M.C. 202, the Reggiane Re. 2001, and some pre-series Reggiane Re. 2005. These aircraft were used to intercept the American B-24 bombers which increasingly hit the city of Naples.
The Dewoitine proved to be very efficient in this task, managing to damage several bombers, often causing the bombers to abort their missions. They were helped by their powerful 20 mm cannon, which at the time had no equivalent on the Italian fighters of the unit (except for the Re. 2005). This is not particularly surprising, as the cannon firing through the propeller hub, a feature of the D.520, and in general most French fighters of the era, was found to be highly accurate in most situations, though limited by a magazine of only 60 rounds. The Italian planes, such as the Macchis and the FIATs, were less precise, but had increased magazines that guaranteed the possibility to commit to several attacks.
On March 1st, 1943, Major Vittorio Minguzzi, commander of the 22° Gruppo Autonomo Caccia Terrestre, and a Reggiane Re. 2005 veteran, shot down a B-24 in the middle of a bombing run over Naples with a D.520. This kill, considered probable for a long time until the discovery of the bomber’s wreck, was the first recorded victory by a D.520 of the Regia Aeronautica, even if it is likely some Allied aircraft had already fallen victim to Italian D.520s in the previous weeks.
On 19th May 1943 in Littoria, the 371ª Squadriglia Caccia Terrestri (371th Terrestrial Fighter Squadron) officially presented the French fighter to General Renato Mazzucco, commander of the 3ª Divisione Aerea (3rd Air Division), who had come to visit their airbase. This confirms that the 371ª Squadriglia Caccia Terrestri also had a certain number of Dewoitines in service.
On 21st May 1943, the Regia Aeronautica delivered 39 Lioré et Olivier LeO 451 bombers previously captured in the SNCASE factory in Lyon’s Ambérieu-en-Bugey to the Luftwaffe in exchange for the delivery of 30 French Dewoitine D.520s captured by the Germans and apparently never used after the French surrender.
Apparently, these aircraft were delivered without ammunition, without any spare parts, and with evident damage to the weapons and equipment on board. It is supposed this damage was sabotage performed by French pilots, before their aircraft fell into Axis hands during the Battle of France.
After Italian mechanics disassembled some of them to cannibalize the spare parts, these Dewoitines were supplied to the 161° Gruppo Autonomo Caccia Terrestre (161st Autonomous Terrestrial Fighter Group) based at several airports in southern Italy. The numbers are not known, but they were used by the 163a SquadrigliaCaccia Terrestri (163rd Terrestrial Fighter Squadron) in Grottaglie, 162a SquadrigliaCaccia Terrestri (162nd Terrestrial Fighter Squadron) in Crotone, and 164a SquadrigliaCaccia Terrestri (164th Terrestrial Fighter Squadron) in Reggio Calabria together with a force of Italian fighters.
Other units that used the D.520 were the 355a Squadriglia (355th Squadron) and the 370a Squadriglia (370th Squadron), with both units receiving three each, under the 24° Gruppo Autonomo Caccia Terrestre (24th Autonomous Terrestrial Fighter Group).
The 232a Squadriglia Caccia (232nd Fighter Squadron) of the 59° Gruppo Bombardamento Terrestre (59th Terrestrial Bombardment Group) received an unknown number of D.520s for escort duties alongside Savoia Marchetti S.M. 79 three-engine bombers. An unspecified number were used by the 167º Gruppo Autonomo Intercettori (167th Autonomous Interceptor Group) based in Guidonia with the specific task of defending the city from bombers. It is also known that D.520s were used by the 60° Gruppo Bombardamento Terrestre (60th Terrestrial Bombardment Group), and the 13° Gruppo Caccia (13th Fighter Group), the latter being stationed at the Arena Metano Airport near Pisa.
According to official records, on July 31st, 1943, the Regia Aeronautica still had 47 Dewoitine D.520s in service, which were used mostly in the role of bomber interceptors.
In the confusion that followed after the armistice of 8th September 1943, the departments of the Royal Italian Army parted ways. Some, continuing to fight for the Axis, became part of the Aeronautica Nazionale Repubblicana or ANR (Republican National Air Force). The Aeronautica Cobelligerante Italiana (Italian Co-belligerent Air Force) fought for the Allies, but did not use the D.520.
Many Dewoitines were destroyed by pilots and mechanics, or were captured by the Germans, who re-used them in the Luftwaffe.
The ANR took possession of three D.520s previously in service with the 24° Gruppo Autonomo Caccia Terrestre. These three aircraft were assigned to the recently established 101º Gruppo autonomo caccia (101st Autonomous Fighter Group) in Turin-Mirafiori for training tasks with Macchi M.C. 200 and FIAT C.R. 42 and, disbanded some time later, without ever taking part in combat.
Italian Evaluation
The Italian judgment of the Dewoitine D.520 was not entirely positive for two reasons. The first is to be found in a nationalist perspective, which gave a negative perception for the foreign D.520. Secondly, pilots such as the ace Luigi Gorrini, who had the opportunity to test it in simulated combat against other fighters, did not consider it agile enough compared to contemporary aircraft, such as the Macchi M.C. 200. Italian pilots considered the D.520 inferior to the Macchi in all areas except armament.
However, the spacious cockpit, the very efficient communication system (when not tampered with), and the 20 mm cannon were praised. These would only be introduced on Italian aircraft starting from 1943. Against US bombers, the guns made a marked difference even if the little ammunition on board was often a limiting factor. The same had been found by French pilots during the campaign of France, who often had to rely on the machine-guns if the mission went on for too long; this was more of an issue against the more robust bombers which were being fielded by 1943.
Italian camouflage and markings
The typical camouflage used on the Italian planes was similar to the original French one. The coat of arms of the French Air Force was covered with new layers of paint, adding a band on both sides of the wings and one on the fuselage with white paint. The Croce di Savoia was painted on the rudder, a distinctive symbol of Italian aircraft since June 1940. An interesting note is that the Croce di Savoia on the Dewoitines was painted without the coat of arms of the Italian royal family.
At least one specimen was painted in an aluminum color (since the photo is in black and white, for a long time, it was believed to be in Olive Green). It had the typical coat of arms of Italian fighters, the Fasci Littori, on the sides of the cockpit and the ‘Fasci Littori Alari’ symbol of the Regia Aeronautica on the wings. This unique example was painted on the occasion of General Mazzucco’s visit to Guidonia.
The 59° Gruppo Bombardamento Terrestre aircraft received the standard camouflage used in North Africa by the Royal Italian Air Force, khaki with dark green spots. These D. 520s were painted with the Savoia royal family coat of arms.
The ANR specimens were painted in light gray with dark gray spots, a tricolor on the fuselage and rudder and the ‘Fasci Littori Alari’ on the wings. According to evidence, at least one specimen remained in the classic French camouflage, perhaps being repainted into the ANR camouflage at a later time.
Conclusions
Despite the little information on the operational history of the Dewoitine D.520s in Italian service, we can suppose that it was appreciated by the Italian pilots, even for their rancor against all aircraft of foreign origin. The limited numbers received and deployed by the Italian units did not permit a great service of these French aircraft by the Regia Aeronautica. For much of their service, these planes were held at airports for maintenance.
Dewoitine D.520C-1 specifications
Wingspan
10.18 m
Length
8.75 m
Height
2.55 m
Wing Area
16 m²
Engine
Hispano-Suiza 12Y-45
Power at Critical Altitude
935 hp at 4,200 m
Max RPM
2,400 RRM
Propeller
Three-bladed Ratier or Chauvière (3 m diameter)
Empty Weight
2,050 kg
Maximum Takeoff Weight
2,740 kg
Wing Load
195 kg/m²
Fuel Capacity
400 liters standard
640 liters with wing fuel tanks
Time to Altitude
4,000 m in 5’13”
6,000 m in 7’57”
8,000 m in 13’24”
Maximum Speed
425 km/h at sea level
535 km/h at 6,750 m
Cruising Speed
400 km/h
Stall Speed
125 km/h
Range
Around 900 km with a standard fuel load
1,500 km at max fuel load (equipped w/ wing tanks)
Maximum Service Ceiling
11,000 m /
Crew
1 Pilot
Armament
20 mm HS-404 firing through the propeller hub with 60 rounds
4x MAC34M39 machine guns with 675 rounds per gun in the wings
Number Completed
60 officially delivered to Regia Aeronautica unknown used in active service
Illustrations
Credits
Written by Arturo Giusti
Edited by Henry H.
Illustrations by Oussama Mohamed “Godzilla”
Sources
Dimensione Cielo Aerei italiani nella 2ª guerra mondiale, 3° Volume, Edizioni Bizzarri, Rome, 1972
Danel and J. Cuny, Docavia n°4: le Dewoitine D.520, Editions Larivière, Paris 1966
Democratic People’s Republic of Korea – (1960s – Present)
The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) is one of the world’s lesser-known nations, but one that is periodically mentioned in Western media for diplomatic incidents with neighboring nations after testing ballistic missiles. This article attempts to shed light on Korea’s most famous, and numerous family of ballistic missiles, the Hwasŏng, in English literally “Star of Fire”, which in the Korean language (Hangŭl) indicates the planet Mars.
Creation of the DPRK Missile Program
Going back in the history of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, the first rockets it had available were various artillery rocket systems from the Soviet Union, such as the BM-8, BM-13 and BM-31 ‘Katyusha’ Multiple Rocket Launchers. These systems first arrived between 1948 and 1950 in Korea and were used against UN forces during the Korean War with great results.
In the following years, several ‘Katyushas’ remained in service with the KPA, and in the early 1960s they were joined by the modern 122 mm, BM-21 ‘Grad’, and Chinese produced MLRs such as the 107 mm Type 63. Both systems were studied and reverse engineered in late 1960s, with the creation of the 122 mm BM-11 MRLs and 107 mm Type 75.
North Korean-produced 122 mm BM-11 on ZiL-151 trucks. These are the most common Korean copies of the BM-21 ‘Grad’ MLRS distinguishable for the presence of 30 tubes instead of 40 divided in two blocks of 15 tubes. Source: KCBC https://i.imgur.com/4fBuab4.jpg
Between 1968 and 1970, North Korea purchased several S-2 ‘Sopka’ coastal defense missiles from the Soviet Union, enough to equip 5 batteries. With the help of the People’s Republic of China, North Korea created the first maintenance and assembly facilities for the S-2 missiles, and newly purchased HY-1 Chinese anti-ship missiles. The deliveries of these anti-ship missiles were made both from Chinese military stocks, and kits that were assembled in Korea at the Mangyongdae Facility, to allow Korean scientists to become familiar with the systems.
North Korean S-2 ‘Sopka’ coastal defense missiles during a parade in early 1970s. Source: KCBC https://i.imgur.com/EEwPx7t.png
Later in the 1960s, the Soviet Union supplied the DPRK with heavy artillery rockets, defined by NATO as Free Rockets Over Grounds (FROGs). More precisely these were 3R9 Luna and 3R10 Luna-2 rockets in 2K6 complexes (FROG-3 and FROG-5), and 9M21 Luna-M rockets in 9K52 complexes (FROG-7). An important note is that the USSR refused to help Korea create its own missile program for political issues, and only aided Korea in building facilities to assemble anti-ship and S-75 missiles. On the other hand, China delivered many types of reverse engineered Soviet Surface-to-Air Missiles (SAM), anti-ship missiles, and associated technologies to DPRK. Chinese assistance would probably have been greater, but the PRC did not possess the same systems, and level of knowledge, as the Soviet Union.
In 1972, the DPRK created its first missile plant for the production of Chinese anti-ship missiles but, for their assembly, they still needed some hi-tech components from China. These SAMs, and coastal defense anti-ship missiles, provided the Korean engineers with material to familiarize themselves with modern missile technologies, such as rocket guidance and propulsion. By 1973, North Korea had enough missiles to equip its navy with 10 Komar-class, and 8 Osa-class missile boats armed with P-15 and HY-1 missiles.
Some sources claim that the DPRK received 24 Luna, Luna-2 and Luna-M and an equal number of 2P16 Transporter Erector Launcher (TEL) but this number has never been confirmed with certainty, in fact, another source says that the DPRK received between 27 and 63 missiles, and 9 TELs, from the Soviet Union. Some also state that the DPRK acquired between 24 and 56 9M21 Luna-Ms between 1975 and 1976, together with 6 or 8 TELs from Egypt, but these deliveries have never been confirmed.
Nomenclature
Missiles
NATO
TEL
Complex
3R9 Luna
FROG-3
2P16
2K6
3R10 Luna-2
FROG-5
2K6
9M21 Luna-M
FROG-7
9K52
The first copies of these missiles appeared in the following years, being renamed Hwasŏng.
The code Hwasŏng-1 being uncertain to which missile it refers to, but all sources seems to agree that it is the Korean designation of the indigenous production of the 2K6 Luna, while Hwasŏng-3 is the Korean designation of the indigenous production of the 9K52 Luna-M missiles.
The two missiles had a range of 45 and 65 km (28 and 40 miles), and carried a High-Explosive warhead of about 400 kg (881 lb). The Soviet models could be equipped with small nuclear warheads, but the Koreans, at that time, did not have miniaturized nuclear weapons, as the first tests on a nuclear reactor were only carried out in 1958. It is, however, very likely that the DPRK developed chemical warheads for such missiles.
Data on the missiles designated Hwasŏng-2 and Hwasŏng-4 are unknown, but they never reached mass production.
Some sources speculate that the designation Hwasŏng-2 was given to the Korean copy of the S-75 surface-to-air missile, a hypothesis rejected thanks to Korea itself, that calls the S-75 copy Pongae-1. The Hwasŏng-4 may have been given by the Koreans to the joint project of a Short-Range Ballistic Missile (SRBM), between DPRK and People’s Republic of China, referred by the Chinese sources to Dōngfēng-61 (DF-61). This project was born at the end of the 1970s at the behest of Kim Il-sung himself, who in April 1975, traveled to Beijing where Oh Jin-u, North Korean defense minister, asked the People’s Republic of China to purchase their SRBM missiles.
The DF-61 program, born in late 1976 to develop a missile with a range of 600 km (372 miles) and possess a warhead of 1,000 kg (2,200 lb), had a very short life due to the fact that in 1978 its main Chinese supporter, Chen Xilian was limited in his powers and eventually purged for political reasons in 1980. The failure of the DF-61, however, was not a defeat for the DPRK technicians, as thanks to the exchange of knowledge with the Chinese, had greatly increased their knowledge of missile design. In these years, the DPRK gradually diminished their imports of anti-ship missile technology from China, in favor of indigenously produced equipment.
The Hwasŏng-5 – The First Korean SRBM
Due to the deterioration of relations with Moscow, and the unsuccessful joint project with China, the DPRK, as soon as the DF-61 project was closed, decided to turn to another country. A nation that possessed Soviet-made missiles and that, at the same time, was in debt to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea: the Arab Republic of Egypt.
International relations between Korea and Egypt have always been very close from the mid 1950s. In early 1973, after political issues, Egyptian president Anwar Sadat expatriated all the Soviet advisors, pilots and instructors from its country. It was a bad idea, considering that the Arab nation was preparing to launch an attack on Israel, and its military was dependent on Soviet equipment. In March 1973, a delegation from the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea led by Kang Ryang-uk, Vice President of the Supreme People’s Assembly of the DPRK, visited Egypt, and the Egyptians asked for Korean technical assistance with their missile program.
In June 1973, 20 MiG-21 pilots and 19 ground crew members from the Korean People’s Air Force were sent to Egypt to train the Egyptian pilots. When the Yom Kippur War broke out on 6th October 1973, the DPRK’s pilots (joined by others that arrived later) supported Egyptian troops against the Israeli Defense Force.
This was only the last of a series of diplomatic and military trades between the Arab country and the small Asian country; and it was a good excuse to ask a favor to Egypt, with Kim Il-sung requesting Soviet-produced SRBMs from Egypt. Some sources claim that the missiles were received in 1976 while other claims they were received by Korea in 1981. Despite the discordant sources, Egyptian president Sadat agreed to sell to the DPRK SCUD-B missiles received from the Soviet Union in the early 1970s for use against Israel. It seems that the agreement was not signed until 1981.
The Short-Range Ballistic Missiles received from Egypt were the R-17E ‘Elbrus’ (also known as 8K14E, or with the NATO name SS-1C SCUD-B). These were purchased together with a Soviet-made TEL, a MAZ-543P. A missile production factory, Factory 125 in P’yŏngyang, the Research and Development Institute in Sanum-dong, and the Musudan-ri Launch Facility were also set up in the DPRK at that time with the help of Soviet Union, which by the early 1980s changed had changed their policy about helping Korea in its missile program.
It should be noted, however, that a Korean defector claimed that in 1972, 20 SCUD-Bs were provided by the Soviet Union in exchange for the secret material found aboard the USS Pueblo in 1968, which was provided by the DPRK to the USSR. This claim however has never been confirmed, and in fact, in the 1970s and early 1980s, no SCUD-B tests were reported, and it is very likely that his information was a misidentification or totally false.
The R-17E had a slow process of reverse engineering which led DPRK engineers to develop a slightly modified domestic version, which was christened Hwasŏng-5, the first SRBM produced by DPRK. To finance the reverse engineering program, funds were allocated from Islamic Republic of Iran. Prime Minister Mir-Hosein Musavi and Defense Minister Colonel Mohammad Salimi in October 1983, signed an agreement with North Korea to finance the Korean program in exchange for receiving missiles when the program concluded.
In 1984, the first Korean copies of the R-17E were produced and the first test launch took place in April of the same year with some others occurring for the rest of the year, with at least two failures. It seems that all the R-17E in Korean arsenals were dismantled and studied to copy their components, even if some statements hypothesize that some missiles tested in 1984 were R-17Es, and were launched to confuse the analysts on the real results of the missile program. Incredibly, the first official appearance of the Hwasŏng-5 was on 7th April 2007 and a year after one camouflaged Hwasŏng-5 was shown to a Myanmar delegation.
The first version, however, saw a very limited pilot production and was replaced by a new version of the Hwasŏng-5 in 1985, when the full scale production also started.
This version had a length of about 12 meters (39 feet), a diameter of about 0.8 meters (2.6 feet) and a range of 330-340 km or 205-211 miles (compared to 300 km -186 miles – of the R-17E) and a 1,000 kg warhead that could be standard High Explosive, Cluster, Chemical and probably even Biological. The Hwasŏng-5 was produced until 1989 when it was replaced by the Hwasŏng-6. The number of Hwasŏng-5s produced is unknown.
The Hwasŏng-6 was developed on the basis of the Hwasŏng-5 starting in 1987, when Korean engineers began working on the missile guidance system to reduce the Circular Error Probable (CEP), the maximum distance the missile could miss the target.
According to North Korean sources, the CEP of the Hwasŏng-6 was decreased from several hundred meters of the Hwasŏng-5 to 50 meters (164 feet). The increased accuracy of the missile allowed the warhead to be decreased to 750 kg (1,653 lb), and increased to size of the rocket’s fuel tanks which brought the estimated total range to 500-700 km (310-434 miles).
The first test of the Hwasŏng-6 took place in 1988, immediately after which the assembly lines were modified, and mass production began in 1989. According to some Western estimates, in 1999, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea was estimated to have produced 600 to 1,000 Hwasŏng-6, of which 300 to 500 had been exported, and 300 to 500 were in service with the Korean People’s Army Strategic Rocket Force, and 25 were used in tests.
The Hwasŏng-5 and Hwasŏng-6 enabled the DPRK to work on its missile program by providing a good deal of knowledge, and laying the foundation for the Korean People’s Army to become independent of the Soviet Union and the People’s Republic of China in the development of Ballistic Missiles.
1990s Development: New Leader, New Threats
The new decade brought a number of changes to the DPRK: first, though not the most important, the collapse of the Soviet Union, followed a few years later by the death of Kim Il-sung. On 8th July 1994 North Korea’s Great Leader Kim Il-sung died suddenly from a heart attack leaving his first-born son Kim Jong-il, the leader of the nation which, after the fall of the Berlin Wall, and the collapse of the Soviet Union, had been almost completely isolated. The collapse of the Soviet Union resulted in the cessation of the supply of wheat and other edibles to Korea drastically decreasing the food supply in the country, which was also due to several crop damage recorded in the late 80s and early 90s. The famine occurred between 1994 to 1998 and is known in Korea as the Arduous March which caused an estimated number of 240,000 to 3,5 millions of deaths from starvation or hunger-related illnesses. Kim Jong-il instead of investing funds in agricultural growth to get out of famine, launched the Songun policy, a sort of “Military-First” policy aimed at improving North Korean military capabilities at the expense of the population.
This increased Western fears of Kim Jong-il, who was seen as an unscrupulous dictator and thus capable of starting a war against South Korea. South Korean and US analysts were already predicting that he was a much more dangerous character than his father because of a number of bombings against South Korea that had occurred in previous years, under his initiative. These included the Rangoon Bombing of 9th October 1983, an attempt to kill the South Korean president Chun Doo-hwan, and the Korean Air Flight 858 Bombing on 29th November 1987 to intimidate travelers to the South Korean Olympic Games.
The new decade did not bring only bad news to Korea, however. The destabilization of the Soviet Union in 1989 allowed Korea to bring some Soviet scientists closer to its cause on the pretext of lack of work, if the Cold War ended. In April 1991 Korean agents contacted Soviet solid-state physicist Anatoliy Rubtsov in Beijing during a meeting. They offered to Rubtsov to recruit Soviet physicists and scientists for them in the Soviet Union, in exchange for compensation from the North Korean embassy in Moscow. The proposal was attractive, and it was clear that the Soviet Union would not last long, and so Rubtsov accepted.
Dr. Rubtsov began recruiting Soviet strategic weapons specialists at the Makeyev Rocket Design Bureau in Miass in February 1992. His offers to work in Korea were quite interesting, with monthly salaries ranging from $1,500 to $4,000 to work on North Korean missile and nuclear programs; however, the program included assistance to other unknown nations, likely Iran and Syria.
The total number of Russian scientists that were recruited by Dr. Rubtsov is unknown, some analysts quote the number to be about 60 scientists, but according to Russian and Western sources, at least 64 were blocked in Russian airports before their departure to Korea.
In January 1994, a Japanese newspaper claimed,quoting Russian reports, that the Russian missile specialists in DPRK were 17, including Dr. Rubtsov, plus another 9 nuclear scientists. Along with these scientists, there may have been many others since upon arrival in Korea, some not only received Korean citizenship but also changed their names.
In the late 1980s, the DPRK began development of a new missile that was essentially a scaled-up version of the earlier Hwasŏng-5 and 6: the Hwasŏng-7, also known by its unofficial Western nickname of Nodong-1 ,or Rodong-1 depends which type of translation is used.
The Hwasŏng-7 was first uncovered by the West in May 1990 at the Musudan-ri Test Launch Facility, when it was still under development and later tested 1992.
With a length of about 18 meters (59 feet), a diameter of 1.35 meters (4.1 feet), and a speed of mach 10 (12.348 km/h – 7,672 miles per hour). This new missile is a step forward compared to previous DPRK designs. There are two versions of the Hwasŏng-7: a version with a standard conical nose with a 1,000 kg warhead, and a range estimated at around 1,000 km (621 miles), and a version with a double conical nose that decreases the warhead to about 700 kg (1543 lb), but increases its range to an estimated maximum of 1,500 km (932 miles).
A big step forward for the DPRK, was that it could now threaten Japan with a missile capable of carrying a small atomic warhead.
Due to the restricted airspace of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, not many Hwasŏng-7 tests have ever been reported. However, we can take as an example the Islamic Republic of Iran which has purchased the Hwasŏng-7, and has produced several indigenous variants called Shahab-3 which, although possessing some differences with the original missiles. These have a range of 1,280 km (795 miles) for the 1,000 kg warhead version and 1,930 km (1,199 miles) with the lighter warhead. According to some estimates, the KPA-SF have about 300 Hwasŏng-7 but have fewer than 50 TELs to transport and launch them.
Kim Jong-il did not slow down the missile development started by his father, and under his leadership was presented a new missile designed Hwasŏng-8 appears to be a modified Hwasŏng-6 variant with a 500 kg (1,102 lb) warhead and a length increased to 12.4 meters (40.6 feet) allowing the missile to reach a maximum range of 700 km (1,543 miles).
Despite the characteristics suitable to hit targets in South Korea, it seems that this missile has never been used by the KPA but only by Syria that tested it in September 2000. For unknown reasons, the Hwasŏng-8 reappeared in 2021, but it seems that the name was simply given to another missile based on the first stage of the Hwasŏng-14. The new Hwasŏng-8 is claimed to be the first North Korean Hypersonic Medium-Range Ballistic Missile with Hypersonic Glide Vehicle (HGV), becoming a dangerous threat for South Korea because of its speed and ability to change trajectory, which results in greater difficulty of being intercepted by anti-ballistic missile.
The Hwasŏng-9 (US Department of Defence – DoD designation KN-04) first appeared in 1994, but remained relatively unknown in the west West until 2016. This is the last missile in the Hwasŏng series to have ties to the Soviet R-17E.
The diameter has increased to just over a meter while the length is about 12.8 meters (42 feet).
The structure appears to be made of an aluminum alloy, combining the Korean copy of the Isayev RD-21 engine with a 500 kg warhead that can be launched against a target about 1,000 km away, making it a Medium-Range Ballistic Missile (MRBM). Unfortunately, estimates of how many Hwasŏng-9 missiles the Korean People’s Army – Air and Anti-Air Force (KPA-AF) has in service are unknown, some estimates refer to as few as 15 while others exaggerate that number to as many as 100.
In 1999 the Korean People’s Army’s Ground Force Artillery Commands subordinate to the KPA-AF were reorganized into the new Korean People’s Army – Strategic Rocket Force (KPA-SRF).
The beginning of the new century – The Beginning of a New Missile Era for DPRK
First appearing in 2010, the first Intermediate-Range Ballistic Missile (IRBM) to enter service was the Hwasŏng-10, which has received several unofficial nicknames including: Nodong-2, Taepodong-X, BM-25 and Musudan. In appearance the missile is really similar to the Soviet-designed R-27 ‘Zyb’ Submarine-Launched Ballistic Missiles (SLBM).
Despite its late appearance, it is certain that its development began in the mid-1990s, and is thanks to the knowledge brought to the country by the Russian scientists led by Dr. Rubtsov, now member of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Science Academy.The first presentation to Kim Jong-il took place in 2004, but was kept secret. Also the absence of missile tests for such a long time made many believe that this missile was a fake created to confuse Western secret agencies. The missile can be equipped with a conventional warhead of about 1,000 kg or with a nuclear warhead with an estimated power between 80 and 200 kilotons.
Obviously, the missile received some modifications to better suit Korean requirements.
The TEL designated to carry this missile could carry 20 tons of cargo, while the R-27 weighed only 14 tons, and so it was decided to enlarge the missile, bringing it from 8.8 meters (28.8 feet), to about 11 meters (36 feet) in length, thus increasing the previous range of about 600 km (372 miles) to 2,400 km (1,491 miles). Another big difference seems to be the fuel supply of this missile, which appears to be a hypergolic mixture of Unsymmetrical DiMethylHydrazine (UDMH) as fuel and Nitrogen TetrOxide (NTO) as oxidizer.
As for the UDMH, it was a step forward since previous Korean missiles used a Soviet version of the Tonka German-designed rocket propellant, a mixture of Nitric Acid and Kerosene also known as TM-185. As for the Oxidizer, it is unknown which was used, the original R-27 used AK-27P Inhibited Red Fuming Nitric Acid (IRFNA) and was very similar to the one used on the R-17 Elbrus missiles. This would have led the DPRK to not have to modify its chemical plants to produce this oxidizer, but later this hypothesis was denied.
The DPRK used a new oxidizer on the upgraded version of the Soviet R-27U missile, namely N2O4 which gave the new version a range of 3,000 km (1,864 miles).
It is true that N2O4 is more refined and powerful, and would increase the range of the missile, but it is also more difficult to handle because it is more volatile and toxic than the already extremely dangerous AK-27P IRFNA and in fact is rarely used as oxidizer for ground ballistic missiles. NTO also has a narrow range of temperatures for the liquid form, forcing the user to periodically make environmental controls.
Despite these issues, Western analysts and technicians have stated that NTO is the best match for the flight path of the Hwasŏng-10 in the June 2016 ballistic test. Despite the switch to such an oxidizer, the missile has a range of “only” 3,000 km and is unable, for example, to reach new strategic targets such as the Island of Guam, and so while it is a big step in DPRK missile development, it does not amplify its offensive capabilities.
According to Korean sources, a version of the missile was tested with solid fuel in 2016; it would be a Korean version of the Julang-1 SLBM. The use of solid fuel would increase the missile’s range to 3,500 km (2,174 miles). The Hwasŏng-10 was spotted rarely in parades and only a few test launch were made, this suggests that the Koreans had found serious problems during its testing and preferred to abandon the project when newer missiles were completed.
In the first decade of the new millennium, the DPRK continued to improve its missile program, such that after the Hwasŏng-10, the next ballistic missiles are powered by solid fuel. This has led to a substantial modification of chemical plants and fuel production, in fact, producing liquid fuels is cheaper, easier and less dangerous. This modification will certainly cost a lot to the DPRK, but it has brought a series of unprecedented innovations.
First of all, the solid fuels are more energy dense than liquid fuels guaranteeing to missile of the same size and weight to possess superior range than it were to it be using liquid fuel. They also do not need a lengthy fueling process before the launch, which makes the TEL and the missile very vulnerable to enemy attacks. Liquid fuels are more volatile and could cause catastrophic explosions in the event of an accident To avoid this, the missiles were fueled immediately before launch from specialized tanker trucks. In the case of short-range ballistic missiles, this operation can take a short time, less than an hour, but with medium-range and intermediate-range ballistic missiles, this operation can take much longer. This period of time when the TEL and the missile are stationary in the launch zone can be easily detected by enemy spy satellites, and South Korea or the United States may then decide to launch preemptive strikes to prevent its launch.
With solid-fueled missiles, the fueling phase is eliminated, dramatically decreasing the time to battery and launch the missile. At the same time, the missile does not need specialized vehicles in its vicinity, this reduces the logistics and total cost for Korea, and the risk of being intercepted by spy satellites.
The earliest example of a North Korean solid-fuel missile is the Hwasŏng-11 tactical ballistic missile ,US DoD designation KN-02, a copy of the Soviet 9K79M ‘Tochka’. Its unofficial western nickname is ‘Toksa’ (Eng: Viper). First appearing in 2004, and with still debated origins, some sources speculate that the Hwasŏng-11 may be reverse engineered from Soviet missiles purchased in the 1990s from Syria, while other sources do not exclude the possibility that the missiles were purchased from Russia itself, perhaps even with the signing of a contract for Russian development support in the late 1990s or early 2000s.
The debate becomes even more complex when considering that the South Korean Media reports the first test of the Hwasŏng-11, which was unsuccessfully tested in 2004, was based on a Soviet 9K79-1 ‘Tochka-U’ model missile that Syria did not yet possess at that time.
This claim by the South Korean media cannot be confirmed and most importantly, the missile externally is much more similar to the 9K79M rather than the 9K79-1.
As Israeli military sources stated in 1989, Syria and the DPRK cooperated in developing Surface-to-Surface Missiles (SSMs). Thanks to this agreement, Korean engineers were able to study other solid-fuel missiles, such as the 4K44 ‘Redut’, P-20 ‘Rubezh-A’, and also the Tupolev Tu-143 ‘Reys’ Unmanned Reconnaissance Aircraft with solid-fuel engines, whichSyria delivered in exchange for Korean help. In 1994, the missiles were exported to Korea which began reverse engineering them.
The Hwasŏng-11 is a small missile compared to the others of the Hwasŏng series. With 6.4 meters (21 feet) long and 0.65 meters (2.1 feet) in diameter, it has a shorter range than previous missiles, reaching about 220 km (136 miles) but it has a CEP reduced to less than 100 meters (328 feet). With a payload capacity of 485 kg (1,069 lb), quite exceptional for a 2 tons missile, its warhead can be a single HE, HE submunition, thermonuclear, chemical, and probably biological. This missile is considered by the KPA-SRF as an emergency missile, capable of being launched in a short time, and thanks to its dimensions, it is easily concealable. It must be launched as close as possible from the Demilitarized Zone without being spotted, due to its short range.
Despite its reduced dimensions, this missile is considered to be a great threat from Democratic Republic of Korea missile experts. Analysts have hypothesized, that given the nuclear weapons progress of the DPRK, it could be armed with a reduced nuclear warhead of 100 kilotons, therefore being able to hit Seoul from P’yŏngyang. The big problem is that such missiles, and their TELs, are very difficult to keep under observation due to their small size and can therefore, in case of conflict, be even more dangerous than the Hwasŏng behemoths that are easier to identify and keep an eye on. The reduced dimensions also translate in cheaper production and maintenance costs,even for the TELs, meaning that North Korea could increase its arsenal of Hwasŏng-11s and launch them in salvos against South Korea as first strike weapons to saturate anti-missile defenses before the arrival of more powerful ballistic missiles.
Its maximum speed is estimated to be around mach 5 (6.174 km/h – 3,836 miles per hour), being able to reach Seoul from P’yŏngyang in only one minute and forty seconds.
Its speed is not its biggest advantage, in fact, the missile has a trajectory similar to MRLs and is difficult to intercept and counter by South Korean missile countermeasures.
Despite some speculations, the first successful test took place in 2005 and mass production likely started the following year. According to some ROKA estimates, the KPA-SRF has 100 Hwasŏng-11 missiles in active service and 30 TELs to launch them. Also according to South Korean estimates, TEL commissioning operations are around 16 minutes with 2 minutes to launch the missile and another 20 minutes to reload the TEL increasing the threat along the southern half of the peninsula.
2010s – New Leader, New Program
In the decade that saw the death of the second member of the Kim dynasty, there were developments unexpected by a nation like Korea. Kim Jong-il died from a heart attack on 17th December 2011 leaving the country in the hands of his third son, Kim Jong-un.
The money gained by illicit activities of the DPRK, such as counterfeiting foreign currency, drug trade, and other traffic allowed the new leader, Kim Jong-un to invest billions in the development of new ICBMs.
North Korea new leader Kim Jong-un inspect a Hwasŏng-12 missile on its TEL shortly before the missile test in May 2014. Source: brookings.edu https://i.imgur.com/yzjEdQ0.jpg
Going in numerical order, the Hwasŏng-12 (US DoD designation KN-17) was first spotted on 2014, some sources suspect it is a Korean copy of the Soviet two-stage liquid fuel Inter-Continental Ballistic Missile UR-100.
The new Korean missile lies somewhere between an Intermediate-Range Ballistic Missile and an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM), and has a diameter of about 1.5 meters (4.92 feet), and a height of 16 meters (52.5 feet). The propulsion of the first stage is about 100 tons of thrust, provided by 4 auxiliary engines, and an engine of 85 tons of thrust. This being the Paekdusan-1B (or Baekdusan-1B depending which type of translation is used), the Korean name of which seems to be an engine derived from the Glushko RD-250, used on some Soviet ICBMs. Initially, it was not clear how the Koreans had the opportunity to study such an engine, at first it was assumed that they had the support of Russian or Ukrainian engineers after the fall of the Soviet Union, and maybe even some samples of the engine. It is more plausible that Korea came into possession of the official blueprints, stolen from the Yuzhonoye Design Office in Ukraine. In fact, in May 2012 two North Korean citizens were arrested in Ukraine on charges of stealing confidential documents from that office. Due to the possibility of this missile hitting Guam island, many western sources nicknamed it “The Guam Killer”.
It seems however that the Korean variant is equipped with only one nozzle instead of the two of the original model, suggesting that the Korean variant actually incorporates features of the RD-250 engine, and the copy of the Soviet 4D10 engine, used on the Hwasŏng-10.
It has an estimated range of 3,700 km (2,299 miles) with a 650 kg (1,433 lbs) warhead, 4,500 km (2,796 miles) with a 500 kg (1,102 lbs) warhead, up to a maximum of 6,000 km (3,728 miles) with a lower weight warhead (to be classified as an ICBM it must reach 5,500 km – 3,417 miles thus double identification). Korean sources have presented a nuclear warhead for such a missile that, according to western analysts, could have a power of 1 megaton.
Also a great introduction is the Maneuverable Re-entry Vehicle (MaRV) used to change the trajectory of the warhead in flight when detached from the last stage of the missile. This, driven by a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), dramatically decreases CEP, and also makes the warhead more difficult for adversary radar detectors to intercept.
According to some estimates, the warhead has a speed, during descent, from 15 to 24 Mach (18,375 km/h – 11,509 mph to 29,400 km/h – 18,414 mph).The missile entered service and quickly replaced the Hwasŏng-10 which was plagued by 4D10s engine reliability issues.
Little is known about this missile’s service history apart from that, on 1st January 2023 the Korean leader Kim Jong-un visited the Thaesong Machine Factory (also known as the Jamjin missile factory), located on the western edge of P’yŏngyang. In the images published by the Korean Propaganda Ministry, there are at least 26 Hwasŏng-12 awaiting for final assembly. This meant that the missile is in service and is currently in production.
https://i.imgur.com/17GLxwE.jpg Images released by DPRK’s Propaganda Ministry on 1st January 2023 showing the North Korean leader accompanied (in second photo) by his daughter Kim Ju-ae inspecting the production lines of Hwasŏng-12 missiles. Source: KCTV https://i.imgur.com/buu8Wvh.jpg
In 2011, the People’s Republic of China supplied the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea with 8, some sources mention 6, WS51200, super heavy duty trucks. Almost immediately, the UN accused China of militarily supporting the DPRK by violating international embargoes, but China argued that these vehicles were for timber harvesting.
In spite of this defense, the West looked with suspicion at this transaction, expecting something very big in the coming years in the Korean missile program.
The long-awaited moment for analysts came in April 2012, when at the Kim Il-sung 100th Birth Anniversary parade, the mockup of the Hwasŏng-13 (US DoD designation KN-08) three-stage liquid-fuel ICBM was first spotted in 2008.
The Hwasŏng-13 or NK-08 on parade in Kim Il-sung Square in April 2012. The TEL is a WS51200 super heavy duty truck converted by DPRK’s factories into a missile transporter. Source: twitter.com @KPA_bot https://i.imgur.com/xM0inrm.jpeg
In 2012, it was labeled as part of the disinformation campaign to misdirect Western analysts.
It was later discovered that in fact, the design of this massive three stage missile was slowed down by the problem of the engines being nothing more than two 4D10 engines produced under license and coupled together. In addition to the suspicion of Chinese trucks, the West expected a missile of this size after an engine test occurred at the Sohae Satellite Launching Ground in September 2016.
This system gave many problems as it did on the Hwasŏng-10. It seems that the Koreans have decided to set aside the twin 4D10s in favor of the derivative of the RD-250 engine that generates less power, and decreases the range, but gives less problems in terms of reliability. This missile in the Korean terminology has not changed its name, but has become for the US DoD designation KN-08 Mod. 2 or KN-14. According to estimates, the first model of Hwasŏng-13 with twin engine 4D10s would have a maximum range of 11,500 km (7,145 miles) while the second two stage model has a range of 10,000 km (6,213 miles), placing it under the category of Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles. These are the first Korean ICBMs, and the first Korean missiles capable of threatening the east coast of North America, thus being able to reach far inland cities, like Chicago and Toronto. According to analysts,the range was not wide enough to hit Washington DC with a nuclear warhead presented in March 2016, estimated at 500-700 kg (1,102 – 1,543 lbs) although specifications were never provided by the Koreans.
According to the estimates of Western analysts on the first model, the first stage of the missile (which is the same as the Hwasŏng-12) would have dimensions of 17 meters (55.7 feet), the second about 2 meters (6.56 feet) while the third would have a total size of 1.25 meters (4.10 feet) for a total height of about 20 meters (65.6 feet) while the second model with the RD-250 engine, with only two stages would be shorter reaching a total height of about 16 meters (52.5 feet).
The Hwasŏng-14 (US DoD designation KN-20) first shown in 2017, has a diameter of 1.7 meters (5.5 feet) and a length of about 19 meters (62.3 feet).With its two stages, it is capable of reaching a range of 10,000 km thus able to hit the east coast of the United States. This missile was developed mostly as a testbed to develop more powerful ICBMs that will later be seen in service with the KPA-SRF. Despite its purpose, it can be armed with a 750 kg nuclear warhead with a power of 1.44 megatons, the same warhead that was tested on 3rd September 2017 during the sixth Korean nuclear test.
The two-stage Hwasŏng-15 (US DoD designation KN-22) was, up until 2020, the largest ICBM in the world, with a diameter of more than 2 meters (6.56 feet), and an overall length of about 24 meters (78 feet). It surpasses the Russian RS-24 and the Chinese DF-41 and is capable of carrying a warhead of 1,000 kg therefore, able to carry a warhead of 1.44 megatons as the Hwasŏng-14, or more likely Multiple Re-entry Vehicles (MRV)and several decoys at a range of 13,000 km (8,077 miles), and at a maximum apogee of 4,500 km (2,796 miles).
Other hypotheses are that the missile can be equipped with Multiple Independently-targetable Re-entry Vehicles (MIRVs) that are nuclear (or biological) submunitions and guided by GNSS on to multiple targets. This would allow, for example, to hit more cities on the east coast of the United States, or the capitals of nations in Europe, capable of threatening the most prominent world powers.
The first stage of the Hwasŏng-15 has a two-chambered main engine developed by the RD-250 powered by a turbopump to increase thrust at takeoff that missile experts and analysts say increases thrust by 170 percent over the Hwasŏng-14.
The second stage, it is assumed, will be powered by two smaller engines developed in DPRK. Some estimations speculate that the DPRK is in possession of about 40 Hwasŏng-15s thus capable of seriously endangering the many European nations and the United States.
2020s -The Best was not Enough for Kim Jong-un
For Kim Jong-un, the Hwasŏng-15 was not enough, and on 10th October 2020 for the 75th anniversary of the founding of the Workers’ Party of Korea parade, he presented to the world the Hwasŏng-17 (US DoD designation KN-27). Until 24th March 2022, this missile was known in Western nations with the name of Hwasŏng-16. This is because the real name was not revealed by the Koreans until the first launch test took place on that date. Previously, analysts, news outlets, and other enthusiasts fans had named it Hwasŏng-16 continuing the chronological numeration.
This two-stage, liquid-fueled ICBM with a length of 24 to 26 meters (78 to 85 feet) and a diameter of just under 3 meters (9.84 feet) is capable of launching a 2,000 to 3,500 kilogram warhead (2.2 ton to 3.3 ton) at a range, according to some experts, of 13,000 kilometers (8,077 miles).
Its warhead is supposed to be a series of MRVs or MIRVs, with decoys, representing a threat to nations with anti-ballistic missile programs,such as the United States. Some analysts surmised that such ICBM will retain the same range as the previous Hwasŏng-15, which is enough to hit almost any target on the globe. Its increased size allows it to carry warheads of greater weight, making it significantly more destructive than the previous missile.
Supposedly, the warhead could be: a single one-megaton one or several submunitions of several tens,or hundreds, of kilotons each. To give an idea of the destructive power of such devices, the US atomic bombs that hit Hiroshima and Nagasaki had a power between 15 and 30 kilotons each.In both cases the missile was probably equipped with some decoys to deceive the tracking systems for Anti-Ballistic Missiles.
Because of the missile’s huge diameter, it has also been speculated that the missile’s first stage (approximately 17.5 m – 57.4 feet in length) could accommodate four RD-250 engines, for a power output never before developed for a Korean ICBM. Quoting US and South Korean sources, the Hwasŏng-17 is powered by a mixture of nitrogen tetroxide and Unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine.
While the Hwasŏng-17 seemed to be the apotheosis of North Korean missile power, during the parade for the 75th Anniversary of the founding of the Korean People’s Army on 8th February 2023, the new Hwasŏng-18 was presented to the crowds. The new three stage solid-fuel ICBM has an estimated length of 25 meters (82 feet) and an estimated payload of 1,5 tonnes, and an increased range of 15,000 km (9,320 miles).
The official presentation of the Hwasŏng-18 on 8th February 2023. Source: twitter.com @KPA_bot https://i.imgur.com/zqWDeIS.jpg
Last but Probably not Latest
On 2nd April 2024 the North Korean technicians tested a new missile of the Hwasŏng-16Na (‘Na’ meaning B in Hangŭl). The Hwasŏng-16Na is the second North Korean hypersonic missile with a Hypersonic Glide Vehicle after the Hwasŏng-8 in 2021. The current information available on the weapon, as of publication, describes the Hwasŏng-16Na as a two-stage solid-fuel missile with a length estimated in 20-21 m and a diameter between 2.1 to 2.3 m. Probably to save up money and development, the two-stages of the Hwasŏng-16Na are the same ones of the Hwasŏng-18.
Obviously the presence of the ‘B’ in the name makes it plausible that there is another version of this missile but it is not yet confirmed or shown to mass media.
Brief Nomenclature
Name
US DoD Designation
Other Designations
Hwasŏng-1
FROG-3
Hwasŏng-3
FROG-5
Hwasŏng-4
DF-61
Hwasŏng-5
SS-1C SCUD-B
Hwasŏng-6
SS-1C SCUD-C
Hwasŏng-7
SS-1C SCUD-D
Nodong-1
(Rodong-1)
Hwasŏng-9
KN-04
SCUD-ER
SCUD-D
Nodong-1M
(Rodong-1M)
Hwasŏng-10
Nodong-2
(Rodong-2)
Taepodong-X
Musudan
BM-25
Hwasŏng-11
KN-02
Toksa
Hwasŏng-12
KN-17
“The Guam Killer”
Hwasŏng-13
KN-08
KN-08 Mod. 2
KN-14
Hwasŏng-14
KN-20
Hwasŏng-15
KN-22
Hwasŏng-16Na
Hwasŏng-17
KN-28
Hwasŏng-18
DPRK’s TEL, MEL and TEs
The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea has had problems, since the beginning of the development of its missile program, in developing and producing Transporter Erector Launchers, the vehicles for transporting, lifting and launching missiles. The first available were 2P16 TELs on the PT-76 amphibious light tank chassis received from the Soviet Union, along with the 3R9 Luna, 3R10 Luna-2 and 9M21 Luna-M missiles.
It does not appear, from sources, that Korea produced the TEL 2P16 under license, although they were producing the PT-76B amphibious tank under license ,according to Korean sources, since 1967 at the Sinhung Tank Plant.
Instead, it appears that the Koreans switched to wheeled vehicles such as the TEL 9P113, derived from the Soviet ZIL-135LM heavy duty truck with which they transported the Hwasŏng-1 and Hwasŏng-3, and FROG rockets supplied by the Soviet Union during the 1970s. In that period the DPRK also developed a TEL on a indigenous truck, the Sungri Number 2, a Korean copy of the Soviet KrAZ-255.
As the KrAZ-255, the Sungri 2 was an heavy duty 10-ton 6×6 off-road truck with a 1,486 cm3 engine delivering 240 hp, enough to transport the missiles of the early Hwasŏng series.
This was the first missile carrier developed in North Korea and was for some decades, the only one.
In the following years, with the arrival of the new R-17E Elbrus from Egypt, also came an example of 9P117M1 TEL on the chassis of the Soviet heavy duty truck MAZ-543P. The Korean technicians of the Second Academy of Defense Sciences together with the Korean Workers’ Party Munitions Industry Department through its subordinate Second Economic Committee ( the developer of every other Korean carrier missile to date) tried in every way to copy it, but with poor results until 1984, when the Hwasŏng-5 entered service. Mass production at the Sungri General Automotive Factory, where Korean missile carriers are still produced today, was however very slow to start. To speed up adoption, North Korea bought some Japanese Nissan UD 8×8 or HINO 8×8 trucks from China or Soviet MAZ which were then modified by the Koreans into TELs.
In other cases, vehicles will be produced in Korea but with foreign sourced parts such as Isuzu engines. To fulfill a 1985 Iranian order for a hundred missiles and 12 TELs, both 9P117M1 and modified Nissan UDs were supplied until 1987.
The original MAZ-543P, on which the 9P117 and 9P117M1 TELs were based, according to western sources, were shipped in kits and assembled in Korea.The MAZ-543 was developed by the Belarusian Minsk Prime Mover Plant, weighed 23 tons, and was 11.65 meters (38.2 feet) long, with a fully loaded top speed of about 60 km/h (37 mph) thanks to its 520 hp D12 diesel engine.
Being based on the R-17 SCUD, also the Hwasŏng-9 was transported and launched by a slightly modified MAZ-543P.
With the presentation of the Hwasŏng-7, a considerably larger weapon than the previous Hwasŏng-5 and -6 missiles, a new version of the 9P117 was introduced. It was modified in Korea and has no official name.
Such a TEL has a fifth axle of rear wheels, lengthening the size of the MAZ-543P by about two meters, from the original 11.65 meters to about 14 meters (46 feet). It does not seem that the last axle is connected to the transmission, transforming the vehicle into an 8×10, and probably decreasing the top speed. It is also noticeable the modification of the erection mechanism, that due to the lengthening of the chassis, has been moved back. These types of modifications allowed North Korean automotive technicians to gain experience in developing and producing heavy trucks, which proved extremely useful in the next decades.
For the Hwasŏng-10, the TEL used is a Korean variant of the MAZ-547W 12×12 with a launching cab in the center of the chassis, and a modified cockpit with a new top position on the right side of the vehicle. Such modifications, together with the fact that transportation from Belarus, where they are produced, would be impossible without being spotted by Western analysts and satellites, suggests that the DPRK has received them dismantled. The Korean workers had then assembled and modified them independently.
After initial testing of the Hwasŏng-10, the Koreans realized that on takeoff, the force and heat generated by the missile damaged the TELs, so steel covers were added to the wheels to prevent extensive damage. These modifications were carried over to only a few TELs while most likely keeping some unchanged for parades, in fact, such vehicles without covers have a more massive and characteristic appearance than the true TELs.
For the Hwasŏng-11, the MAZ-6303 series trucks were used. According to some sources, the vehicles were the MAZ-630308-224 6×6 or MAZ-630308-243 6×4 model produced in Belarus and derived as civilian models later modified in TELs by the North Korean. This showed once again that the DPRK had problems in producing even small TELs in the mid-2000s.
These trucks have however a great advantage, thanks to the smaller dimensions of the Hwasong-11. The missile is kept inside the launcher bay, which opens at the top to erect the launcher rail and the missile along with it. This makes storage and transport safer, and makes the vehicle much more difficult to distinguish from standard transport trucks using spy satellites.
While most of the characteristics of the vehicle remain similar or identical to those of the Belarusian model, the TEL of the Hwasong-11 has a weight of about 14 tons, a 330 hp engine, and a top speed of about 80 km/h (49.7 mph) when fully loaded.
Also used for the Hwasŏng-12, were the same versions of MAZ-547W used for the Hwasŏng-10. This suggest that the Belarusian MAZ trucks were largely sent to the DPRK in the early 2010s to guarantee an adequate number of TELs for the Hwasŏng-12 that is still produced today. It’s also possible that the Koreans slowly started to produce their own copy of this heavy duty truck, probably with the help of Belarusian or Russian technicians.
New WS51200s heavy duty trucks were used for the Hwasŏng-13 and -14. These trucks were supplied by the Chinese and had, in order to circumvent international embargoes on the sale of weapons and military material, the fictitious purpose of transporting wood and were delivered with a red coloration typical of civilian vehicles produced by Wanshan Special Vehicle.
Subsequently, the KPA has modified these vehicles for the transport of missiles with a hydraulic ramp that rises at 90°. The power developed by the missile’s engines during take-off would destroy or damage a common TEL so the Koreans had to develop an alternative solution, developing it into a Transporter Erector (TE), a vehicle that transports and lifts the missile but is not able to launch it. This would mean that the missile would have to be launched only in certain positions easily detectable by western satellites. This is why the majority of North Korean missiles, from Hwasŏng-13 onwards, have a launching pad that allows the crews a margin of maneuver on where to launch the missile, and are able to launch the missiles on unprepared terrain, and not from fixed launching positions.
The pad is erected together with the missile by the TE erection system, which then moves away. Once the commissioning operations are completed, the missile is then launched.
Another positive side of TEs is that in case of an enemy attack on the launch site, the missile carrier is not involved in the launch, improving its chance to remain unharmed, and to be used in other launches.
The WS51200 is a heavy duty truck produced by Wanshan Special Vehicle of Wanshan in China based on trucks developed by MAZ and MZKT such as the MAZ-7912 and MZKT-79221. This 20-meter-long 8-axle truck weighs 42 tons and is capable of carrying up to a maximum of about 45-50 tons of cargo.
It is equipped with Cummins Diesel KTTA19-C700, a 6-cylinder in-line engine with an output of 700 hp at 2,100 rpm 19,000 cm³. It is equipped with a direct injection pump, with a weight of 2,073 kg (4,570 lbs), and a fuel tank that can hold approximately 800 liters. At full load, its consumption is estimated at 300 liters per 100 kilometers, more or less like a MZKT-79221. Although some sources claim that this vehicle, thanks to the Cummins engine, has a range of 1,000 kilometers without specifying whether full load or not.
The power of the engine allows this juggernaut to travel at a maximum speed of 60 km/h when unloaded. Of the eight axles, the first three are steerable, the last three are counter steerable, and all six are traction, allowing the vehicle a reduced turning radius.
For the massive Hwasŏng-15, at least four WS51200s have been modified in Korea by removing the hydraulic missile lift system, the instrument panel, and cockpit and replacing them with new models. More importantly, a ninth wheel axle was added between the sixth and seventh front wheel axles, making it the largest ICBMs transport vehicle in the world, as well as the only TE ever made with 9 axles. Although the traction was changed from 16×12 to 18×12 it seems that the original engine remained unchanged, thus decreasing the TE’s top speed.
It can be assumed that perhaps more WS51200s were supplied from China, or that Korea started to produce them under license. Analysts, after seeing the modification to the Chinese heavy duty truck, assumed that in the future Korea would also eventually display independently produced heavy duty TEs, and so it happened in 2020.
An 11-axle Transporter Erector appeared for the Hwasŏng-17, a unique vehicle capable of carrying the missile with estimated weight between 80 and 150 tons. It is as of publication, the largest TEL in the world.
Given the remarkable strides made by the Korean industry, it is likely that this new heavy duty truck will be manufactured in Korea. This is confirmed in more recent years by the appearance of the new TEL for the Hwasŏng-18, a 9 axle truck that seems to be assembled in North Korea. The Hwasŏng-16Na TEL had similar characteristics to the Hwasŏng-18’s one but is shorter, with just 7 axles instead of 9. It also had a curious shaped cover for the Hypersonic glide vehicle fixed on the TEL’s cab. Both models seem derived from Chinese trucks but produced in North Korea. As satellite images suggest, at the Kusong Tank Production plants in the past years , new facilities were created to assemble these heavy trucks.
The number of TELs available to North Korea has roughly doubled in recent years, but that’s not the end of the story. The DPRK is currently decommissioning its “Soviet” TEL models, their heavy duty trucks with eight or more axles. These are heavy, and hard to produce and maintain in service. The Kim’s nation now has its attention on the MEL (Mobile Erector Launcher) models, a prime mover that pulls a trailer or a semitrailer on which the missile is mounted. These models, much more similar to the Chinese Dōngfēng carrier series than to the Soviet/Russian ones, entered service only in recent years.
In the last period, a TEL very similar to the Chinese DF-31, has been seen with a 6×4 prime mover and a 3-axle semi-trailer. It has been speculated that the prime mover used by the Korean People’s Army Strategic Rocket Force is a licensed copy, or a Korean modification of the Chinese HOWO T7H civilian prime mover. If the Korean version has similar characteristics to the Chinese one, the engine will be a copy of the MAN MC11 6-cylinder in-line diesel engine, 440 hp, 10,518 cm³ with a manual gearbox with 16 gears and a fuel tank capacity of 600 liters. Tire size 315/80R22.5, a net weight of 9,500 kg (20,944 lbs) and a maximum load of 55,000 kg (60.62 tons).A South Korean source says that this vehicle is a TIR version of the 6×6 Taebaeksan-96 licensed copy of the 6×6 KamAZ-55111 truck. This TIR is said to be a joint civilian truck project developed between Russia and Korea, and after producing a few examples with Russia, Korea exported them back home and converted them into MELs without informing the Russians.
These MELs are easier to produce, easier to maintain, are easier to conceal, and are cheaper, necessary for an industry like Korea that, until the late 2010s, had difficulty producing heavy duty missile carriers on its own. Some were used in multiple parades to show Kim Jong-un and the Korean population Submarine Launched Ballistic Missiles, and therefore not launchable from TELs or MELs, such as the Pukguksong. Others were equipped with canisters of about 2 meters in diameter, and therefore are unable to carry the latest ICBMs of the Hwasŏng series, while others have been seen carrying Hwasŏng-14, and not being able to launch them. It is assumed that they are not used by the KPA only as parade vehicles, but can also act as “ammunition carriers” following the TEs,reloading them after the first launch.
Another example of missile carriers used by the DPRK are tracked TELs on tank chassis which, although it seems anachronistic, the DPRK has less difficulty in producing instead of standard wheeled TELs. The advantages of the TELs on tank chassis are, first of all, the ease of production compared to the production of TELs of Belarusian or Chinese origin, and allow for the possibility to cross rougher terrain that wheeled vehicles cannot overcome, thus increasing the number of launch sites and making it more difficult for spy satellites to identify all the favorable positions.
The disadvantages with respect to wheeled TELs are that the increased vibrations of a tracked chassis, that could damage the sensitive electronics of Korean missiles, and the creation of a new tracked vehicle production line that could slow down the already slow Ch’ŏnma and Songun-915 production lines.
These TELs are a good idea if they are converted from old disused tank hulls, as the Soviet Union did in the 1960s by converting the now obsolete IS-2 Mod. 1944 into renamed 2P19 TELs that mounted R-17 Elbrus missiles, and became the 8U218 missile complex.
The experienced crews of these TELs and TEs are considered invaluable by the KPA and prior to each test launch they are removed to a safe distance along with their vehicles to avoid losing them in accidents. Training such crews requires time and obviously a very high cost and it is not easy for Korea to replace them or their carriers in case of an accident, even now that Korea has reached a certain autonomy in the production of missile carriers.
Export
Although the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea is often referred to as the “Hermit Kingdom” by the Western media, Korea has more exports than can be expected, in 1985 it signed a contract with Iran for the purchase of an unspecified number of Hwasŏng-5 ranging (according to western sources) from a minimum of 90 to a maximum of 100, and 12 TELs for a total of 500 million USD. Part of the deal was also to help Iran develop its own production line for the autonomous production of SRBMs. The first missiles arrived in Iran in 1985, beginning a reverse engineering program that led the Iranians to produce their first copy of the Hwasŏng-5, the Shahab-1 in 1987. By the same year, all missiles and TELs ordered by Iran had been delivered.
Two years later, in 1989, the United Arab Emirates purchased a number of Hwasŏng-5 and some MLRS but due to “unsatisfactory quality” according to some sources or, due to US pressure according to other sources, decommissioned them very quickly.
In 2008, Myanmar and the DPRK signed a contract for a missile technology transfer so that Myanmar could also develop its own missile program. According to some analysts, and the People’s Republic of China, the DPRK delivered the Hwasŏng-5 to Myanmar to familiarize themselves with the operation of the missiles. The North Korean-Myanmar relationship was confirmed by the weapon’s arrival in Myanmar’s harbors, with the merchant ships being loaded not only with missiles, but also small arms and artillery rockets.
The Hwasŏng-6 was exported to Iran in the latter half of the 1980s, before being studied and then produced under license under the name of Shahab-2 from 1990 onwards.
In January 1993, General Mohsen Rezaee Commander of Iranian Revolution Guard Corps went to P’yŏngyang to sign a 2.7 billion dollars contract purchasing 300 Korean SRBMs for Iranian oil.
A few Hwasŏng-6 were sent to Syria to be studied and produced under license with the support of the People’s Republic of China. In 1996, some Syrian technicians went to Korea for 2 weeks to study missile development techniques directly from Korean technicians.
Some missiles have been supplied to Yemen since the 1990s. In 2002, the North Korean merchant ship ‘So San’ was boarded in the Arabian Sea, after being detained by Spanish and US warships. In the cargo bay, covered by bags of concrete, there were 15 Hwasŏng-5 or 6 SRBMs. However the US did not have the authority to seize the cargo and the ship docked in Yemen. This was not the only North Korean merchant ship who arrived in Yemen, and in the years to follow, some unconfirmed sources claimed a total number of 45 North Korean Hwasŏngs arrived in Yemen.
In 2009, some Hwasŏng-6 were supplied to Myanmar for the development of its own variant but nothing is known about this deal. According to SIPRI, the Socialist Republic of Vietnam purchased a total of 25 Hwasŏng-6 in 1997. An unsurprising development as Vietnam has a limited missile arsenal, and is unable to produce them. Unfortunately, no other news about their service is available. To date, the only Vietnamese unit using ballistic missiles is the 490th Missile Brigade, which had in service not only the Hwasŏng-6, but also the Soviet R-17 Elbrus variants known in west as SCUD-B and SCUD-C, fielding an unknown number of examples. For what is currently known, Vietnam is only equipped with conventional high-explosive warheads, and as Army Recognition and Defence Leaders reports, in 2023, Vietnam started upgrading its SCUD fleet with “foreign partners” to reduce the missile’s original CEP.
In 1999, according to US intelligence, Pakistan signed a contract with the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea for the development of a MRBM.Beginning in 1993, some North Korean scientists and engineers arrived in Pakistan and began working with the Pakistani Khan Research Laboratories (KRL) to aid in the development of a new MRBM. The work proceeded expeditiously, though against strong international pressure for the Pakistanis to give up Korean aid.
In April 1998, the first launch of the missile was made 120 km from Islamabad. The Ghauri reached 350 km of apogee but during the re-entry, the conical nose of the missile melted due to the heat and the test failed. The new Pakistani administration, under international pressure, exploited the failure of the test, kicking North Korean missile engineers out of the country and ordering the KRL to continue development.
By 2003, the tests were completed and the missile, with the name Ghauri-I, officially entered service with the Pakistan Army. The Ghauri-I had a maximum range of 1,500 km, a payload of 750 kg of conventional explosive or nuclear warhead and a total weight of 15.8 tonnes. It is estimated that Pakistan has 30 Ghauri-I missiles in service and the tests of the newer all-Pakistani variant occurred in 2004, 2010, 2012 and 2015. The Circular Error Probable (CEP) is estimated at 190 meters. Now, the Ghauri-I is substituted in first strike units from its upgraded versions: the Ghauri-II and Ghauri-III.
In the 1990s, Iran also began to develop its own version of the missile nicknamed Shahab-3, which was tested from 1998, and entered service in 2003. There are four different versions of this missile, the first one is not very different from the original Korean version, while the last one has a range of 2,000 km (1,242 miles) and a warhead composed of 5 submunitions of 280 kg each (617 lbs).
Egypt and Libya have also had or have in service a number of Hwasŏng-7. Of the Egyptian missiles not much is known, while the Libyan ones were dismantled in 2003 when dictator Mu’ammar Gaddafi agreed to the disarmament of most of the weapons of mass destruction in his country. Some analysts were skeptical of the complete destruction of this arsenal but, there is no evidence of Hwasŏng-7 launches during the Libyan Civil War or subsequent fighting between Libyan militias, therefore, we can assume that Libyan Hwasŏng were all destroyed by 2004.
Not a single Hwasŏng-9 has been exported beyond the Korean borders, while the last missile known to have been exported is the Hwasŏng-10.Some sources and rumors have claimed that the Hwasŏng-10 has been sold to Iran. It is correct to say that such a missile has been proposed for export, in fact in the report of a Myanmar delegation that visited several military facilities and factories in the DPRK in 2008, made a reference to a SCUD-F with a range of 3,000 kilometers. This more or less confirms the maximum range of the Hwasŏng-10, and also that such a missile has been proposed for export.
In 2010, it seems that Iran has purchased 19 Hwasŏng-10 missiles according to a leaked classified report from the US State Department, even if the number has never been confirmed, and at first it was thought that this information was false since Iran did not show anything similar until 2017. In January, an MRBM with similar characteristics to the Korean missile nicknamed by the Iranians Khorramshahr, from the name of an Iranian city, was tested. According to some analysts this missile is the direct descendant of the Hwasong-10.
In the 2000s, Saddam Hussein’s Iraq bought parts of Korean missiles in order to integrate them into their missile development. A 9 million USD contract was purchased for parts such as guidance and control systems, inertial navigation systems, on-board computers, gyroscopes, and accelerometers that were probably used on the Al-Fat’h and Al-Samud missiles. The parts were taken by ship to Syria and from there were delivered to the Iraqis. It does not appear that any Korean parts were found in any of the Iraqi missile facilities by the US in 2003 during Operation Iraqi Freedom, so either they never arrived in Iraq or the Iraqis had already integrated them.
Brief Korean Hwasŏng Tests
The first documented North Korean missile test occurred in 1984 when the Hwasŏng-5 was successfully tested while a few years later the Hwasŏng-6 was tested.
In 1990 the Hwasŏng-7 was tested for the first time, resulting in a successful launch test. On 29th-30th May 1993, another missile test of the Hwasŏng-7 was conducted and launched from the Hwadae missile base near Wonsan in the Sea of Japan to demonstrate it to the Iranian delegation that had come to Korea.
In 1994 Kim Il-sung, father of the nation, died. Under his government, in 9 years a total of 15 missile tests were made, of which only the one in 1993 created international problems.
Since 1994 and under Kim Jong-il, there have been 16 missile tests, in 2005 some SRBMs of the Hwasŏng series were launched in the Sea of Japan causing alarm among Western analysts.
Between the 2nd and 4th of July 2009, a total of 9 Short-Range Ballistic Missiles and two Hwasŏng-7 were launched into the Sea of Japan in violation of a UN Security Council resolution. The incident created minimal international tension with the Republic of Korea, the United States, Japan, Russia and China condemning such provocative testing.
With the death of Kim Jong-il in December 2011, there has been an increase in terms of Korean missile tests, in fact, from 1984 to 2011 31 missile tests were carried out against 119 tests carried out by Kim Jong-un, third of the Kim dynasty from 2011 until 2022. (in this number are counted also tests of missiles not belonging to the Hwasŏng series)
Between 18th and 20th May 2013, a couple of weeks after the issuance of the sentence to the US student Kenneth Bae arrested months earlier, Korea began another provocation by launching a total of six Hwasŏng-11 in the Sea of Japan.
On 27th February 2014, five Short-Range Ballistic Missiles were launched from Kittaeryong Missile Base in protest of joint exercises between the US Army and the Republic Of Korea Army. On 3rd March of the same year, two SRBMs were launched from Wonsan Kalma International Airport likely to test the ability to launch missiles from airstrips.
On 26th March 2014, in conjunction with an International meeting in Netherlands to discuss the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s nuclear threat, as a show of force the DPRK launched 2 Hwasŏng-7s. These missiles flew about 500 km (310 miles) into the Sea of Japan.
From 26th-29th June 2014, North Korea launched three SRBMs into the Sea of Japan landing them near the sea border with South Korea. Between 2nd and 13th July of the same year, South Korea and Japan accused the DPRK of launching six SRBMs in three separate dual launches and then crashing them into the Sea. The missiles were launched from Kaesong and Hwangju.
On 14th August 2014 a Hwasŏng-11 was launched from Wonsan while Pope Francis was visiting South Korea. In September, another Hwasŏng-11 was launched from Wonsan.
On 8th February 2015, five Short-Range Ballistic Missiles were launched into the Sea of Japan; they flew less than 200 km (124 miles) before crashing into the sea.
On March 2, SRBMs were launched into the sea as a protest to a large joint military exercise between Republic Of Korea Army and US Army. On the 5th of April, SRBMs were launched from the West Coast into the Yellow Sea; the missiles flew about 100 km (62 miles).
In 2016, several missile tests were reported, the first one was on February 7, when both South Korea and Japan detected a missile of unknown model, probably a Hwasŏng-9 from the Dongchang-ri launch site, neither South Korea nor Japan released more details.
On March 10 the DPRK launched two Short-Range Ballistic Missiles which flew about 350 km (217 miles) and crashed into the sea. On 18th March 2016 two Hwasŏng-7 were launched traveling about 600 km (372 miles) before crashing.
On 15th April 2016 the Hwasŏng-10 was tested for the first time but the test was a failure.
On 18th April and 31st May there were tests of 3 more Hwasŏng-10 without success.
On 22nd June 2016 there was the first successful missile test of the Hwasŏng-10, the missile reached an altitude of over 700 km (434 miles) and then fell into the sea.
On 18th July 2016, two SRBMs (probably Hwasŏng-6) and one Hwasŏng-7 were launched into the Sea of Japan.
On 2nd August 2016, 2 Hwasŏng-7 were launched of which one flew 1,000 km (621 miles) and ended up in the Exclusive Economic Zone of Japan. In September, a few SRBMs were launched to coincide with the end of the G20 that year.
In October 2 more Hwasŏng-10 tests failed.
In March 2017, four Hwasŏng-6 modified to have increased range, were tested by launching them towards Japan crashing 250 km (155 miles) off the Japanese coast.
On 22th March Hwasŏng-10 was tested again, the test failed.
On 5th April 2017 a Hwasŏng-12 was tested which, launched from Simpo Base flew about 50 km (31 miles) before crashing into the ocean.
On 16th April another Hwasŏng-12 was tested from Simpo Base, the launch failed on takeoff.
On 29th April, another Hwasŏng-12 missile exploded during a test.
On 15th May 2017, another Hwasŏng-12 was tested, this time successfully, the missile flew nearly 500 km (310 miles) crashing into the Sea of Japan.
On 29th May, an SRBM was launched.
On 4th June the Hwasŏng-14, the first North Korean ICBM tested, was successfully tested, another test on 28th 2017 June was again a success, flying the missile for 45 minutes.
In August other tests were done, the first one on 25th August where three SRBMs were launched and the second one on the 28th when a missile, probably Hwasŏng-12 flew 2,000 km (1,242 miles) over Japan at 400 km (248 miles) altitude. Always in 2017 a missile Hwasong-15 flew for 53 minutes at an altitude of about 4,475 km (2,780 miles) and with a range of 950 km (590 miles).
In 2018, there was a pause in missile launches given the rapprochement of international relations between South Korea, DPRK, and the United States with the Summit between the US President Donald J. Trump and Korean leader Kim Jong-un in Singapore on 12th June 2018.
Due to the failure of the second summit between the two on 28th February 2019 in Hanoi, Vietnam, missile testing resumed.
On 4th May 2019 some Short-Range Ballistic Missiles were tested, ending up in the Sea of Japan.
In the following months more missiles were tested, dozens of KN-23 Short-Range Ballistic Missiles, and a Pukguksong-3 Submarine Launched Ballistic Missile in October.
In 2020 due to the Covid-19 pandemic testing was less sparse within testing of a few SRBMs in March.
On 21st March 2021 another test of two missiles, probably Hwasŏng-11 was successfully completed.
On 24th March 2022, when nearly all the western media outlets were focused on the Russo-Ukrainian war, tests of the new Hwasŏng-17 were carried out at the presence of the Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un.In this test, the Hwasŏng-17 was launched by its TE from the P’yŏngyang International Airport, where it flew for 67.5 minutes at a distance of 1,090 km (677 miles) and at a maximum altitude of 6,248.5 km (3,882 miles) and accurately hit a target in the sea, near Aomori, Japan, as reported by North Korean Central National Television. This information was confirmed by Japan and South Korea’s analysts, which note that this is the longest North Korean launch ever, even more than North Korea’s last ICBM test in 2017.
The Hwasŏng-17 during erection on the 24th March 2022 on one of the P’yŏngyang International Airport’s auxiliary airstrips. Source: KCNA https://i.imgur.com/knABqw6.jpeg
On 26th November 2023, after a complex period for the Democratic People Republic of Korea, North Korean Leader Kim Jong-un participated to view an Hwasŏng-17 launch. On this occasion, he also presented to the North Korean population and to the world his young daughter, Kim Ju-ae.
The North Korean Central National Television claimed that in the test, the Hwasŏng-17 had flown for 999,2 km (620 miles) with an apogee of over 6,000 km and for a flight time of 68 minutes.
On 2nd April 2024 the Hwasŏng-16Na was first flight tested. According to North Korean sources it flew for 1,000 km in 10 minutes (6,000 km/h) whileaccording to South Korean sources the maximum distance was 600 km. Japanese reported an altitude of 650 km beingreached, and confirmed a maximum apogee reached of 101 km. After reaching the maximum apogee, the glide vehicle flew to a height of 72.3 km, the first to land in the Japanese Sea (this was also confirmed by Japanese sources).
The total number of tests in this list are only tests of Hwasŏng series missiles.
From 1984 to 2021, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea conducted 151 missile tests including Hwasŏng series missiles, Submarine Launched Ballistic Missiles, space launches, and other land-based missiles not part of the Hwasŏng series.In 37 years, 15 tests were completed under Kim Il-sung’s government, 16 under Kim Jong-il and a total of 120 under Kim Jong-un’s government for an 80% of missile tests in the last 10 years.
North Korean Hwasŏng-3 loaded on a Soviet-produced 9P113 Transporter Erector Launcher.
North Korean Hwasŏng-5 loaded on a Belarusian-produced 9P117M1 Transporter Erector Launcher.
North Korean Hwasŏng-6 loaded on a Belarusian-produced 9P117M1 Transporter Erector Launcher.
North Korean Hwasŏng-7 (second version) loaded on a Belarusian-produced 9P117M1 Transporter Erector Launcher modified in North Korea to fit the new missile.
North Korean Hwasŏng-11 loaded on a Belarusian-produced MAZ-630308 Transporter Erector Launcher.
Illustrations
Credits
Written by Arturo Giusti
Edited by Henry H.
Illustrated by Carpaticus
Sources:
The Armed Forces of North Korea, On The Path Of Songun – Stijn Mitzer & Joost Oliemans
Reuters; various
autoopt.ru; Product Catalog
sinotruk.com; Product Catalog
missilethreat.csis.org
Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the Director of Central Intelligence on Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction, 30 September 2004, Volume 2 – Central Intelligence Agency
Korean People’s Army Journal Volume 1 Number 2 – Joseph S. Bermudez Jr.
After three years of extreme tension between the Arab Republic of Egypt and the State of Israel in October 1973, Egyptian president Muhammad Anwar el-Sadat signed an agreement with the Arab Republic of Syria to launch a combined attack on the State of Israel. The war began on the 6th October 1973 and lasted for 19 days. Not many know that 20 pilots of the Korean People’s Army Air and Anti-Air Force (KPAAF) were involved in Egyptian air force operations.
Egyptian-Korean Relations
The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea had always maintained a good relationship with the Arab Republic of Egypt, beginning in the early 1950s.The Asian country always supported the position of the former Egyptian president ,Nasser, to nationalize the Suez Canal, and financially helped the country during the Suez Crisis of 1956. The conflict saw the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) launch an attack in the Sinai peninsula, supported by British and French forces that simultaneously landed in Port Said, Egypt. On 3rd November 1956, the DPRK issued a statement of solidarity with Egypt and sent the symbolic figure of 60,000 DPRK’s Wons (about 5,000 USD) to support the Egyptian Army. Between 1957 and 1963 the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and the Arab Republic of Egypt signed some cultural and commercial agreements and opened in the capital cities of both countries.
During the 1960s, Egypt maintained an unclear relationship with North Korea, abstaining from some votes in favor of the DPRK during United Nations meetings until 1962, when Israel, and the Republic of Korea chose not to pursue diplomatic and trade relations.
After the Six Days War, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea sent Egypt 5,000 tons of cereals as aid. In response, Egyptian delegations supported the North Korean regime at the United Nations meetings and in the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) meetings.
The Non-Aligned Movement was created after a meeting in Belgrade, in the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia on 1st September 1961. Among its founders was Egyptian president Nasser, Yugoslavian leader Tito, Indian Prime Minister, Ghanaian President and Indonesian President. This movement was created because, after the Korean War, some nations did not want to take sides against Cold War opponents and be drawn into potential conflicts. In 1975 the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea joined the movement with Egyptian support.
Egyptian MiG-21
The Arab Republic of Egypt received its first MiG-21s from the Soviets in 1963. By the end of that year, the Egyptian Air Force had in its service a total of 60 MiG-21F-13s. These were followed, until the end of the decade, by 40 or 50 MiG-21PFs.
The MiG-21F-13 was an upgraded version of the MiG-21 platform with upgraded on-board radar, new optics, a single 30 mm cannon and the possibility to load 2 Vympel K-13 short-range infrared homing Air-to-Air Missiles (AAMs). In the designation, the ‘F’ refers to ‘Forsirovannyy’ (English: Uprated) and ‘13’ refers to the K-13 missiles.
The MiG-21PF was a heavily updated version of the MiG-21 bringing it to the “Second Generation” of fighters. The upgrades included new turbojet engine and rails for RS-2US Adams instead of K-13 missiles.
The first deployment of the Egyptian MiGs was during the Six Days War where the majority of them were destroyed at their airfields by Israeli preemptive air attacks. The few brave Egyptian pilots that had the possibility to take off in these hours were quickly overwhelmed by better-trained Israeli pilots. The Israeli attack was divided in 4 different waves; in the first one, Israeli pilots claimed to have shot down 8 Egyptian planes, 7 of which were MiG-21s while Egypt had claimed 5 planes shot down by MiG-21PFs.In the second wave, Israeli pilots claimed 4 MiG-21s shot down. At the end of the attacks, Egypt had lost about 100 MiG-21s out of 110 owned by its Air Force.
The few surviving MiG-21s were used in the last days of war to try and slow down the Israeli ground forces in the Sinai peninsula. They were however, only armed with unguided 57 mm rockets. These few MiGs were manned by the surviving pilots of the different squadrons whose aircraft had been lost the previous days. Some of them were deployed for air defense in an air base near Cairo, while the rest were deployed at Inshas air base, north of Cairo, and took part in the attacks against Israeli ground force Israeli forces.
After the Six Days War, Egypt quickly restored its MiG-21 inventory, buying some second-hand MiG from the Soviet Union, and others from Algeria.
About a month after the war, on 15th July 1967, Egyptian MiGs shot down an Israeli Mirage III CJ over Sinai skies at the cost of two MiGs. By the end of 1968, the Egyptian Air Force had in service 115 MiG-21s that were extensively used against Israeli Air Force Mirages, with results still debated today. The Egyptian pilots were not as well trained as the Israeli pilots, and this often led to heavy losses when flying against the IAF.
1969 was a year full of changes for the Egyptian Air Force, in the early months of the year, the radar equipped MiG-21PFMs were equipped with GP-9 gun pods, delivered by the Soviet Union. The gun pods were a great advantage for the MiGs giving them more possibilities of success in dog-fights where the distances between the planes were less than 1,000 meters, where their R-3S missiles (AA-2 Atoll) were less useful.
In late 1969, the MiG-21Ms, with four missile rails and a new internal 23 mm GSh-23L automatic cannon arrived from the Soviet Union. On the 11th of September 1969, Egyptian MiG-21 pilots shot down 3 Israeli Mirages III, two of those manned by Israeli veterans. This battle was widely publicized in Egypt, but the Egyptian government did not mention that to shoot down the three Israeli planes, Egypt lost 5 MiGs and 3 other planes. Between February and March 1970, a total of 80 MiG-21MFs with improved radars and new engines arrived in Egypt.
According to a Soviet report, from July to December 1969, during the War of Attrition fought between the Six Days War and the Yom Kippur War, the Egyptian Air Force lost 72 war planes, 53 of them shot down by Israeli forces. The majority of them were MiG-21s. Due to the poor results of the Egyptian Air Force in the War of Attrition, Egyptian President Nasser was forced to ask the Soviet Union for more help. In March 1970, the first Soviet pilots, and Surface-to-Air Missile (SAM) battery technicians, arrived in Egypt.
On the 13th of April 1970, there was the first Soviet-Israeli air battle in which two MiG-21MFs manned by Soviet pilots, attacked two Israeli F-4 Phantom II. It is not clear if the Israeli planes were shot down or not. In a similar situation, 5 days later, a Soviet MiG-21MF damaged an Israeli RF-4E recon plane. From March to August of 1970, Egypt, thanks to Soviet forces deployed in the country, shot down 8 Israeli planes with S-125 (NATO code SA-3 Goa) Surface-to-Air Missiles, and 13 other planes were shot down by MiG-21s. Egypt would only lose 5 MiG-21s.
In October 1973, the Egyptian Air Force had at its disposal 770 combat aircraft of which about 150 of these were in storage. In total they could rely on 620 aircraft and over 100 helicopters. The planes were: 220 MiG-21s, 200 MiG-17 Fighter bombers, 120 Su-7 Fighter bombers, 18 Tupolev Tu-16 Bombers, 40-50 Il-14 and An-12 Cargo planes, 10 Il-28 Bombers and 100-140 MiL Mi-1; Mi-4; Mi-6 and Mi-8 helicopters. These were integrated with a squadron of MiG-21F-13 from Algeria, another squadron of MiG-21PFs from Algeria that was mainly deployed to defend Cairo region skies, and some Pakistani Instructors that flew some Egyptian MiGs during the war.
The Soviet MiG-21 was less modern than the American F-4 air superiority fighter, although it was more maneuverable than the early models of the Phantom and was much simpler to keep running. During the air combat in the Arab-Israeli conflicts, the difference was often made by the pilot’s experience, giving an advantage to the Israeli pilots who, in some cases, had more experience than the US pilots deployed in Vietnam. The Egyptian pilots had, for the most part, deficient training and lacked experience.
The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea was also familiar with the MiG 21, and received its first MiG-21F-13’s in late 1962, receiving more until 1965 for a total of 14 fighters. In the following years, many MiG-21PFMs arrived in the Asian country. This was a big step forward for the Korean Air Force as the MiG-21s introduced the possibility for the Korean pilots to use Air-to-Air Missiles (AAMs) such as the R-3S (AA-2 Atoll) infrared homing missiles. The later MiG-21PFM would give them the ability to to use both the R-3S and the RS-2U, also known as Kaliningrad K-5M (NATO Code AA-1 Alkali), beam-riding guided missile.
Korean Squadron in Egypt
After the deterioration of diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union, the new Egyptian president Sadat chased the Soviet advisors out of the country and stopped buying their military equipment, and this decision led to a very serious problem.
Not only were Soviet advisors deployed in the Arab Republic of Egypt, but also instructors, the technicians of Surface-to-Air Missiles batteries, and even some combat pilots.
Roughly 30% of the 400 Egyptian combat planes were manned by Soviet pilots and even the 20% of the SAM batteries were manned by Soviets that were leaving the country.
Few Egyptian pilots were well trained, and many had to finish their training very hastily due to the expatriation of Soviet trainers. The last Soviet soldiers deployed in Egypt left the country in July 1973.
The loss of Soviet expertise would force the Egyptians to look elsewhere for training and technical advisors. Between 1st to 7th March 1973 a delegation from the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea led by Kang Ryang-uk, Vice President of the Supreme People’s Assembly of the DPRK, visited Egypt. It was during this visit that Egyptian Military’s Chief of Staff, Saad Al Shazly, asked the Korean politician to help Egypt by sending a single squadron of pilots to give to the Egyptian pilots reliable combat training.
After solving the bureaucratic problems, starting from 6th to 13th April 1973, General Al Shazly went to the DPRK, and during his trip he met Korean leader Kim Il-sung. They finalized the plan and signed an agreement, and a few months later the Korean pilots arrived in the country. For the Korean pilots, it was not difficult to fly the Egyptian aircraft because they were also flying the same variants of the MiG-21 in Korea. Even for the Korean SAM battery technicians, it was not a problem to use the Egyptian SAM batteries because, in Korea, they operated S-75 and the HQ-2, their Chinese copy, which proved similar enough to the systems in Egyptian service.
A total of 20 pilots, 8 ground crew guides, 5 translators, 3 administrative staffers, 1 political commissar, 1 military doctor, and 1 military chief left Korea, reaching Moscow dressed as foreign students, and arrived in Egypt in late June. They started their deployment in Bir Alida air base in southern Egypt in July 1973, the same month that Soviet forces abandoned the country.
These events are mentioned in an article written by analyst Joseph S. Bermudez Jr. about the DPRK’s deployment in other nations in the KPA Journal magazine. The analyst mentions the arrival of 30 pilots while other less reliable sources like newspaper articles sometimes claim 10 pilots arrived in Egypt. However, the commander of this small Korean squadron was Major General Cho Myong-rok (also transliterated as Jo Myong Rok). The numbers were also confirmed by Captain Lee Chol-su, a North Korean defector pilot who crossed the Korean Demilitarized Zone in a MiG-19 in May 1996. During some interviews, Capt. Chol-su confirmed the source of the 20 pilots.
Although it may seem strange today, North Korea had well trained pilots before the fall of the Soviet Union, when their economy could support sizable training programs. Many were trained by North Korean veterans that participated in the Korean War, Soviet advisors, or even at facilities in the Soviet Union together with Soviet rookies. An unknown number of the pilots under Cho Myong-rok were veterans, who had already seen combat in Vietnam, where they flew Vietnamese planes against the United States Air Force. Some of them had more than 2,000 flight hours on the MiG-21. The news of the Korean pilots in Egypt did not remain secret for long.
On 15th August 1973, the Israeli Military Command reported that Israeli Intelligence discovered that between 10 and 20 Korean pilots were flying Egyptian fighter planes. This Israeli claim was confirmed on the same day by the US State Department that also stated that probably they were more than 20.
12 days after the war broke out, on 18th October 1973, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea announced officially that they would send a contingent of pilots to support the Arab Coalition air forces. The KPA Journal states that a North Korean defector, during an interrogation, said that 500 North Korean pilots were sent to Egypt and Syria to pilot their planes after the DPRK’s announcement. This seems like an exaggerated number, as before the war, Egypt had only 620 planes and a maximum of 140 helicopters, while Syria had 200 MIG-21s, 80 MIG-17s, 80 SU-7s and 36 MiL Mi-4, Mi-6 and Mi-8 helicopters. If this statement is true, the DPRK alone had sent enough pilots to fly about 30% of the Arab Coalition planes and helicopters. The number probably also included ground crews, translators, chiefs, officers, and other assorted personnel.
The Korean pilots left Egypt shortly after the war probably between late 1973 to early 1974 leaving the Arab country with a small contingent of veteran pilots for training. There is little information about Korean People’s Army Air Force pilots during the Yom Kippur war, even if some unconfirmed reports mention the deployment of Korean pilots that flew Egyptian and Syrian planes. South Korean newspaper, Kyong Hyang Shimbun, states that the Israeli Ministry of Defence declared that Korean pilots flew 8 MiG-21s during the war and shot down several Israeli F-4 Phantoms, however, this information is not confirmed.
Engagement of 6th December 1973
On 6th December 1973, two Israeli F-4E ‘Kurnass’ from the 69th Squadron, one crewed by Yiftach Shadmi and Meir Gur, while the second was piloted by Shpitzer and Ofer together, flew a mission at the Egyptian border. They were supported by another two ‘Kurnass’ of the 119 Squadron.
These four planes, took off from Ramat David Air Base and were sent on the West sector to patrol the Egyptian border. The pilots were allowed to trespass into Egypt, and after a couple of low level crosses, they entered Egyptian territory at high altitude, and then flew back over the Suez Canal and continued patrolling their side of the border.
Israeli pilots kills
Pilot’s name
Kills
Meir Gur
3
Yiftach Shadmi
3
They were sent in the area because the Israeli command wanted to patrol the southern area of Egypt, where they thought the Egyptians were preparing something.
Pilot Meir Gur reported that at some point, they received orders to search for targets in Egyptian territory. He and his wingman were flying at 20,000 – 25,000 feet while the two ‘Kurnass’ of 119 Squadron were apparently above them.The on-board radars were not working very well, and that day saw heavy overcast and fog. Gur noticed a pair of ‘blips’ on its radar display, and they closed the distance to investigate.
When the Israeli pilots found the ‘Blips’ they dropped their external fuel tanks and continued to search at high speed, but they could still see the bright spots on the radar, and the distance didn’t change. This meant that the two ‘Blips’ were flying at a similar speed to them. Meir’s radar performed a high to low search but it was very difficult to aim with the interference of the ground clutter.
Thanks to a GCI (Ground Control Intercept) station, the Israeli F-4Es of the 69th Squadron were able to track the enemy targets that were now in the range of their AIM-7 Air-to-Air missiles. However the Israeli pilots preferred to wait to engage the targets because of the bad weather, they did not know if the ‘blips’ were warplanes. Another problem was the fog that prevented the wingmen from being seen, so the Israeli pilots decided not to launch the missiles.
A few moments later, two Egyptian MiG-21s appeared in the Israeli pilot’s field of view and the two ‘Kurnass’ of the 69 Squadron immediately engaged.
One of the two MiGs escaped the skirmish while the other one remained for a 1 vs 2 air battle. From the Israeli pilots’ testimonies, the MiG-21 pilot, revealed to be a Korean some years later, was extraordinarily good with excellent reaction times and great knowledge in the maneuverability of his plane.
The Korean People’s Army Air Force pilot was probably a Vietnam War veteran, or otherwise a very well trained pilot. He tried many times to force the Israeli pilots to fight a low speed duel, where he had the advantage, but the Israeli pilots insisted on maintaining high speed.
The 119 Squadron pilots, above the 69th Squadron planes, asked by radio for their fellows to step aside, but the 69th Squadron’s F-4Es did not step aside, forcing the Korean pilot to maintain high speed, putting him at a disadvantage against the faster Israeli F-4s.
After a long chase, the MiG-21 was in range of Air-to-Air missiles and Yiftach Shadmi and Meir Gur’s F-4 launched two AIM-9Ds Air-to-Air missiles. Immediately after, Shpitzer and Ofer’s F-4 that was behind the other 69 Squadron plane, about 200 meters on a side, launched an AIM-9D too. This was a dangerous maneuver, the two Israeli planes risked shooting down each other with the missiles and, at the same time, Shpitzer and Ofer’s F-4 ‘Kurnass’ were at risk of ending up in the jet wake of the F-4 of Shadmi and Gur.
The first AIM-9D went close to the target and exploded but the MiG-21 emerged intact from the explosion and continued its flight. The second and third AIM-9Ds exploded near the target too but, for unknown reasons even in this case, the MiG-21 emerged from the fireballs intact. The Israeli pilots, now desperately low on fuel, were forced to disengage and return to base. Meir Gur was the Radar Intercept Officer (RIO) of one of the two F-4Es, and looking back he saw the MiG was intact, but trailing white smoke. From Meir’s testimony, it is known that the Korean pilot turned his plane west and descended to a low altitude. Meir continued to keep an eye on it to check if it crashed on the ground but no explosions were seen.
While the Israeli planes were near the Suez Canal, Gur saw something that seized his attention. Meir is said to have seen the characteristic smoke trail of a Surface-to-Air Missile launched by the Egyptians. A few tenths of seconds later a giant explosion was visible at about 20,000 feet. Copilot Gur checked on his radar, but all the four ‘Kurnass’ were leaving the Egyptian airspace. By mistake, the Egyptian Anti-Aircraft missile batteries shot down one of their own MiGs manned by the Korean pilot.
When the planes landed safely home the credit was split between the two 69 Squadron plane crews. Meir Gur reported what he saw to the command, and some time later Israeli Intelligence confirmed his story: Egyptian Air Defense forces shut down their own MiG.
Unfortunately nothing is known about the nameless Korean pilot, if he survived ejecting , or if he died by friendly fire. Only in 2019 did the Israeli Air Force and Intelligence service make public the events of that day, informing the world and the Israeli pilots involved in the affair that the MiG pilot was from the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.
Aftermath & Conclusion
After the Yom Kippur War, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea maintained a small training squadron in Egypt and also some other training units for the SAM batteries and other tasks.
Sadat agreed, the DPRK’s request to receive some R-17 Elbrus (NATO Code SS-1C Scud-B) tactical ballistic missiles and a MaZ TEL (Transporter Erector Launcher) to start its own missile program.
In 1990s the Arab Republic of Egypt bought from Korea an unknown number of Scud-C missiles, they seem to be Hwasŏng-7 Medium Range Ballistic Missiles (MRBMs). In 2008 Egyptian telecommunication company Orascom had the permission to create a 3G phone network called Koryolink in Korea.
At the same time Egypt permitted Korea, until the mid 2010s, to use Port Said as safe harbor to unload military equipment that would be sent all over the African continent.To give an example, the United Nations had declared that in 2016 a Korean merchant ship loaded with 30,000 RPGs arrived in Port Said. They were probably later delivered to the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). In 2017 after the US slashed roughly $300 million due the Egyptian help in Korean illegal trades and due some failure to respect human rights. Afterwards, Egyptian Defense Minister Sedki Sobhi, during a visit to the Republic of Korea, said that Egypt had cut all military relationships with Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.
Illustrations
Gallery
Credits
Written by Arturo G.
Edited by Henry H.
Illustrated by Godzilla
Sources
Air Operations During The 1973 Arab-Israeli War And The Implications – Global Security
The Savoia-Marchetti S.M. 79 was a three-engine medium aircraft developed by Savoia-Marchetti, also known as the Società Idrovolanti Alta Italia (SIAI) later SIAI-Savoia. Initially developed as a fast passenger transport aircraft, it was later adapted for use as a racing aircraft, and later as a medium bomber. From 1936 until 1939 it broke several records, both in the civil and military spheres with the Regia Aeronautica (Italian Royal Air Force), also becoming the fastest medium bomber in the world at the time. It was one of the most produced aircraft by Italy during the Fascist dictatorship and was used by 12 different air forces, both civil and military and remained in service until 1951 as a bomber for the Aeronautica Militare (Italian Air Force), and until 1959 as a bomber for the Lebanese Air Force.
History of the Project
During the 1930s, the Italian Air Force was among the world’s leading air forces, with cutting-edge manufacturing and designers.
Italo Balbo, a fervent fascist and Air Marshal, managed to break several records aboard several seaplanes of the Società Idrovolanti Alta Italia (Northern Italy Seaplane Company). In 1928 he made a bold request for the time, asking SIAI for an aircraft capable of taking off from Italy and reaching any location in Libya carrying 8 to 10 passengers. All in the shortest possible time.
It must be emphasized that the Italian fascist regime tended to support domestic efforts in any field or industry in order to bolster publicity and popular support, which is why Italo Balbo required a fast plane, to be able to outcompete French and British air transports on Africa-bound routes to Libya, Somalia, and Eritrea.
In early 1933, Australian nobleman Sir Mac Pherson Robinson created a challenge to reach Melbourne from London in a single intercontinental flight. In 1933 the SIAI decided to compete for the Mac Robinson Cup, and at the same time to satisfy Balbo. Seasoned engineer Alessandro Marchetti (1884-1966) was put at the helm of the project.SIAI put so much emphasis on the project, that Marchetti’s initial blueprints for the new S.79 were dated February 21, 1933.This cutting-edge project featured low wings, retractable landing gear, Handley Page flaps and three Isotta Fraschini Asso 750 engines of 900 hp each.
Subsequently Marchetti was forced to modify the blueprints, first with three FIAT A. 59 RC engines developed by the American Pratt & Whitney R-1690, finally ending up on Piaggio P. IX R.C. 40 engines of 610 hp developed from the French Gnome-Rhône 9K ‘Mistral’.
History of the Civilian Prototype
In May 1934, the last modifications to the project, and design of the first prototype were completed. The new plane was identified as S.79P or Passeggeri ( Passenger). It received the serial number 19001 and codename I-MAGO.
Through August and September of 1934, various parts of the aircraft were produced in SIAI factories in Sesto Calende in Lombardy, and were sent to the Novara Air Base in Piedmont . After being reassembled on October 8, 1934, and with SIAI test pilot Adriano Bacula and engineer Merizzi at the controls, the 19001 prototype made its first test flight.
The aircraft proved promising during the tests. There were excellent results as the aircraft had excellent handling, was easy to fly, and had a comfortable passenger cabin. On the other hand the engines, with only 610 hp at maximum power was not enough for SIAI and Alessandro Marchetti.
Piaggio sent one of its technicians during flight tests, engineer Risaliti, to try to increase the power of the engines, but he failed, managing to bring the aircraft to only 360 km/h at an altitude of 100 meters, and 390 km/h at 3,000 meters, while carrying 3 tons of ballast.
These results were impressive for the time, the Junkers Ju 52 for example had a top speed of 290 km/h, but not enough for a modern plane like the S. 79.
These problems forced the Italian technicians to change the engines with more powerful and reliable ones.
This decision was taken also because the Piaggio P. IX R.C. 40 engines led to two different incidents. The first occurred on 28 October when they attempted a record Novara-Rome route which had to be canceled due to engine failures and the plane returned to Novara.The second accident led to the fire of the engines which fortunately was shut down before the prototype was destroyed.
SIAI therefore decided to remove the Piaggio engines in February 1935, and replaced them with the 650 hp Alfa Romeo 125 RC.35, developed from the British Bristol Pegasus.
Due to the larger diameter, the engines received a new cowling, and finally, on April 5, 1935 Bacula and Merizzi took the re-engineered prototype into the air again.
The new tests yielded very favorable results and the plane claimed several records, the first was to be the first three-engine civil transport to break 400 km/h, and the second to travel from Novara to Rome (500 km) in just 70 minutes, which they accomplished on May 10, 1935.
In Rome, Adriano Bacula had the opportunity to familiarize some Italian pilots on the S. 79. Interestingly a delegation of French aviators led by Minister of the Air Denain with the aces Mermoz and Rossi was in the Italian capital. The French pilots admired the new three-engine plane for its modern design and maximum velocity.
Among the Italian aviators who tested the aircraft there were Maggior Biseo and his colleagues, elites of the 1st Experimental Center who expressed much praise for the Chief of Staff of the Regia Aeronautica, General Valle, on the new vehicle.
Returning to Novara to receive some modifications, such as increased range, on May 26, 1935 the S. 79 was back in Rome with all the required changes including 2 new tanks in the wings for a total of 820 liters of fuel.
The aircraft was registered by the Royal Air Force MM. 260 (Matricola Militare /Military Serial Number) and assigned on June 14 to the 1st Experimental Center.
On August 1, 1936 General Valle flew from Rome to Massawa, Eritrea in just 12 hours of actual flight with a stopover in Cairo for refueling, and returned to Italy 4 days later.
On October 3, 1935 the Kingdom of Italy start the invasion of the neutral Ethiopian Empire to colonize it. The Savoia-Marchetti S. 79 prototype was deployed as liaison plane by General Valle.
The second flight was made on January 6, 1936 when the plane carried General Valle, Biseo, Tondi as well as technicians and specialists Gadda, Ghidelli and Bernazzani.
During the representative trip to Ethiopia which ended on January 18 in Grottaglie, Puglia, the plane traveled 15,000 km proving to be very fast and efficient.
The prototype, MM. 260, was assigned to the Experimental Center but was employed by the 12° Stormo Bombardamento Terrestre (12th Ground Bombing Wing), and was modified to carry 6 100 kg bombs. It was tested on 20 May 1936 by Lieutenant Colonel Biseo and Captain Lippi on the Furbara shooting range.
The tests were repeated with captains Paradisi and Moscatelli of the 12° Stormo who demonstrated that the aircraft was an excellent platform for bombing.
Bomber Variant
In December 1935, SIAI-Savoia proposed a military version of the S. 79 powered by the powerful Gnome-Rhône 14K Mistral Major 14 cylinders with a output of 725 hp at 2,000 rpm, hence the name of the prototype S. 79K. However, the General Staff of the Regia Aeronautica rejected the idea of powering their bombers with foreign engines, and ordered 24 S. 79Ms (M for Militare / Military) to be equipped with Italian-made engines.
S.M. 79 Racing Aircraft or Medium Bomber?
From the first batch of the S.M. 79M, 5 aircraft were modified during production to be used in the civil field, and initially renamed Savoia-Marchetti S.M. 83C, and then returned to the designation Savoia-Marchetti S.M. 79C for Corsa (Racing).
This variant flew without armament, the observer gondola and bomb bay also lost its characteristic hump to increase the aerodynamics of the fuselage.
The autopilot system was then enhanced, the on-board instrumentation adjusted, the door on the left side replaced by a smaller hatch above the wing, and its range was increased by adding tanks instead of the bomb bay for a total of 7,000 liters of fuel.
Other improvements concerned the compressors which, when upgraded, allowed the use of 100 octane petrol Also the transceiver system was replaced with a Telefunken model of greater power and reliability. The propellers were substituted with new variable pitch propellers produced by the French Ratier. New larger radiators were added to better cool the engines and finally, the landing gear was fitted with tires capable of withstanding the maximum weight of the plane fully loaded.
This version was created to participate in the tender organized by the French Aero Club for August 1937 which was to fly to the Istres (Southern France) – Damascus – Le Bourget (near Paris) route for a total of 2,900 km.
For the race it was planned to involve a Caproni Ca. 405 ‘Procellaria’ and two FIAT B.R. 20 but due to delays the Ca. 405 could not participate and the SIAI-Savoia produced a sixth S.M. 79C.
Flying the six aircraft were all pilots of the 205ª Squadriglia da bombardamento “Sorci Verdi” of the 12° Stormo Bombardamento Terrestre, the only Italian pilots who had received a pilot’s license for this aircraft.
Apart from the eight Italian aircraft, there were four French aircraft, a Bloch M.B.160, a Farman F.223, a Caudron C-640 and a Breguet 470 Fulgur, the only English one, the De Havilland D.H.88 Comet.
All took off from 1725 hrs on 20 August 1937, the first plane to land in Damascus was the I-FILU after 6 hours and 51 minutes at an incredible speed of 426.42 km/h.
Partial ranking in Damascus
Pilots
Aircraft Name
Racing Number
Qualified
Average Speed
Biseo and Mussolini
I-BIMU
I-5
Terzo
Cupini and Paradisi
I-CUPA
I-11
Secondo
415 km/h
Fiori and Lucchini
I-FILU
I-13
Primo
426.42 km/h
Lippi and Castellani
I-LICA
I-7
Ottavo
352 km/h
Rovis and Trimboli
I-ROTR
I-12
Quinto
Tondi and Moscatelli
I-TOMO
I-6
Quarto
The partial ranking podium was all Italian, in fact in Damascus five to six of the S. 79Cs arrived before the other aircrafts, the sixth and seventh were the FIAT B.R. 20s with an average speed of 299 km/h and 382 km/h.
I-LICA had problems with the constant pitch of the right propeller forcing the drivers Lippi and Castellani to travel the Istres-Damascus route for another six hours with only two engines.
The ninth plane to arrive in Damascus was the De Havilland D.H.88 Comet with an average of 356 km/h while the first French plane landed with an average speed of 305 km/h.
During the stop, the planes refueled and fixed the propeller. Due to bad weather it was decided to change course for the return and to fly in formation, thus loading an additional 500 liters of fuel.
During take-off, one of the two FIAT B.R. 20 experienced rudder damage while the unfortunate I-LICA ended up hitting a pothole on the runway with the left wheel, breaking the landing gear and yawing violently to the left and making take-off impossible.
One hour after departure, the I-TOMO reported that it had a deficiency of 2,000 liters of fuel, while I-ROTR reported that it had to land in Ronchi due to excessive fuel consumption.
It was therefore decided to have the three remaining SM-79s arrive in Paris in formation. The plan was about to succeed, in fact I-BIMU sighted I-FILU and the I-CUPI but due to the lightning storms masking the transmissions, they could not make radio contact.
Biseo and Bruno Mussolini then decided to overtake the other two S.M. 79 to be recognized and make the formation, but when they reached the Alps they had to climb to 6,500 meters. However in doing so, they were forced to reduce the pitch of the propeller, and during the movement the central propeller went to the minimum pitch and jammed.
The two pilots then decided to land in Cameri where there were technicians who could repair their Ratier propellers. However, after a careful examination, during which the plane was refueled, the two pilots were informed that the propeller problem could not be repaired quickly. It was therefore decided to bring the central propeller to maximum pitch and the plane that had stopped for about 30 minutes took off again towards Paris.
The I-ROTR was unable to reach Ronchi due to lack of fuel and had to land in Pula where, after refueling, it was unable to restart because the electrical circuit of the starter magnet of the central engine had been damaged by hail.
Having repaired the fault, the plane continued the next morning to Bourget and was classified in 8th and last place.
The I-TOMO was unable to reach Ronchi and, again due to bad weather, had to land at the Lido of Venice where it ran aground, as the field was reduced to a quagmire by torrential rain, but thanks to the joint efforts of the airport staff and crew, the aircraft was able to leave after refueling.
The two FIATs also had to land due to problems.
Despite the bad weather and the unsatisfactory reliability of the propellers, at Le Bourget there were three S.M. 79s in the first three positions. The I-CUPI arrived at 1547 hrs on the 21st and circled up to 1602 hrs before running out of fuel, waiting in flight for the I-BUMU as the victory of Benito Mussolini’s son would have been a great benefit for the fascist propaganda. Then it was the turn of the I-FILU which landed at 1617 hrs, and finally at 1637 hrs Biseo and Mussolini arrived who, despite the stop, took a significant third place.
Fourth was the De Havilland D.H.88 Comet which landed at 1701 hrs; fifth the Fulgur Breguet at 1737 hrs; then came the Bloch 160, but having started much earlier than the I-TOMO which arrived at 2002 hrs it was ranked seventh, while the I-TOMO was sixth. The others were all withdrawn or unclassified.
Final ranking in Paris
Pilots
Aircraft Name
Racing Number
Qualified
Average Speed
Biseo and Mussolini
I-BIMU
I-5
Third
Cupini and Paradisi
I-CUPA
I-11
First
350 km/h
Fiori and Lucchini
I-FILU
I-13
Second
Lippi and Castellani
I-LICA
I-7
Unqualified
Rovis and Trimboli
I-ROTR
I-12
Eighth
tondi and Moscatelli
I-TOMO
I-6
Sixth
On 29 August from 1500 hrs to 1530 hrs all the Corsa type planes and the I-MAGO, which had been brought to Paris to witness the triumph of the other S.M. 79 returned to Italy at the Littorio Airport.
From Damascus, however, on 22 August, the organization of the return of the I-LICA to Italy began. The plane was disassembled and the fuselage, engines, tailings and systems were recovered and sent to Beirut, Lebanon and embarked on a merchant ship bound for Italy. The wing, not transportable by road, and other material, was sold in Damascus.
The victory was celebrated in Italy as overwhelming as both the Savoia-Marchetti S.M. 79C and FIAT B.R. 20A were bomber aircraft adapted to racing aircraft while British and French aircraft were specially developed aircraft for air racing.
Despite the victory there were, especially abroad, those who criticized the planes, claiming that the Savoia-Marchetti S.M. 79C would not have been able to participate in the New York – Paris (race which was canceled in favor of Istres – Damascus – Paris).
The Decisive Test: Rome – Dakar – Rio
It was decided for various reasons to make a second record setting flight with the Savoia-Marchetti S.M. 79C. This was mainly to disprove some articles that appeared in newspapers and magazines of the sector of foreign nations that had stated that the S.M. 79 were:
“expressly built for a vain policy of prestige and therefore unsuitable for military uses, difficult to maneuver, excessively loaded, too delicate: in short, devices unable to withstand comparisons of practical use with similar foreign ones”
The French newspapers accused the Savoia-Marchettis saying that they could never win in a Paris – New York race due to limited range.It was also decided to test the possibility of transporting passengers and letters from Italy to South America with land based planes.The 3 S.M. 79Cs, I-BIMU, I-FILU and I-CUPA were taken and modified by SIAI-Savoia technicians, Direttorato Generale Costruzioni Aeree or DGCA (General Directorate of Aeronautical Construction) and the aeronautical military engineers.
The changes concerned the replacement of the propellers with the classic SIAI-Savoia propellers, a complete overhaul of the engines, an enlargement of the fuel fillers to reduce refueling time, improved radio, navigation aids, and autopilot.
The maximum take-off weight of the new version, now renamed Savoia-Marchetti S.M. 79T for Transatlantico (Transatlantic) was now nearly 14,000 kg, 3.5 tons more than the S.M. 79M.
After numerous test flights and tests carried up to December 1937, it was decided that the flight could be done.
The three aircraft were reassigned to different teams of pilots, Biseo and Paradisi took the I-BIMU now renamed I-BISE (MM. 359). Bruno Mussolini and Mancinelli took the I-FILU renamed I-BRUN (MM. 356) while Moscatelli and Castellani took the I-CUPA now named I-MONI (MM. 358).
On the morning of January 24th and at 0728 hrs, the three S.M. 79T took off from Guidonia airport for Dakar, the first leg of the Italy – Brazil.
The planes would have been in constant radio contact with Guidonia and Rio de Janeiro, periodically communicating their position.
At 0830 hrs the planes reported that they had flown over Capo Carbonara in Sardinia and at 0915 hrs they flew over Bona starting to fly over the mountains of the Saharan Atlas. At 1130 hrs the formation commander announced that he had slightly changed the planned route, turning north due to strong wind. At 1330 hrs the devices signaled strong wind with sand clouds and at 1530 hrs they communicated that they were within sight of the Atlantic at Villa Cisneros. At 1630 hrs they flew over Port Etienne and at 1745 hrs San Louis.
Landing in Dakar took place regularly at 1845 hrs Italian time. All navigation took place at an altitude ranging between 4,000 and 5,000 meters where the engines gave maximum power.
The actual distance traveled by the aircraft was over 4,500 km in 10 hours and 50 minutes, the average speed of 419 km/h.
On the morning of January 25 at 0910 hrs (Italian time) the three planes left Dakar for Rio de Janeiro with a wing load of 220 kg due to the greater quantity of fuel and lubricant transported.
The navigation was done in close formation, which took place at an average altitude of 3,800 meters, but was disrupted in the central area of the Atlantic by thunderstorms, headwinds, lightning and sudden showers of rain that forced the pilots to instrumental flight.
The I-MONI, due to a failure of the usual propeller, was forced to continue the flight with only two engines for 2,000 km of the crossing, significantly slowing its average speed to 312 km/h.
At 1730 hrs I-BISE and I-BRUN sighted the Brazilian coast and continued towards Rio de Janeiro, arriving at 2245 hrs at Dos Afensos airport in the midst of a crowd of people who arrived to celebrate the event.
Following a direct order from the commander of the I-MONI formation it headed to Natal where it landed at 1919 hrs for the necessary repairs. It should be noted that the plane could have made it to the finish line without any problems but the crew, tired from the crossing, preferred to land and repair the plane.
I-BISE and I-BRUN had thus completed an effective route of over 5,350 km (of which 5,150 km offshore) in 13 hours and 35 minutes at an average speed of 395 km/h.
The Rome – Rio de Janeiro connection took place within 39 hours and 17 minutes with 24 hours and 22 minutes of actual flight for an average of about 406 km/h on a route of 9.800 km. The I-MONI departed from Natal at 1158 hrs on January 28, and arrived regularly in Rio de Janeiro at 1742 hrs on the same day.
This showed that the Savoia-Marchetti S.M. 79 were not “too delicate” aircraft as foreign press had claimed, capable of reaching South America even with a failed engine.
It should be emphasized that the crossing was not a mere move by fascist propaganda, in fact, it was specifically chosen to lengthen the journey going from Dakar to Rio de Janeiro (5,350 km) instead of Natal (3,150 km).
Another factor was the speed, an average of 406 km/h for 9,800 km had never been sustained, in a single crossing the S.M. 79T broke two records, the speed one on the Rome – Rio de Janeiro route and the highest average speed one on the 5,000 km journey.
Brazil
After the 24 January 1938 race, the three S.M. 79 Transatlantico were then presented to the Aviacao Militar Brasileira (Brazilian Military Aviation). On 27 April 1938 I-BISE, I-BRUN were bought and renumbered K-422, K-420 while I-MONI was donated by Italy and renumbered K-421.
On 9 May 1938 they were assigned to the Escola de Aviacão Militar (Military Aviation School), where Maggiore Nino Moscatelli acted as instructor on at least three flights on 28 June (serial not reported) and then 1 July 1938 with K-421 and 8 July 1938 with K-420 before to returning in Italy acting as a bomber pilot.
On 28 October 1938 K-420 (Italian military serial number MM. 356) was flown by Brazilian pilot Loyola Daher, experienced an accident during a take off but luckily was later repaired, for it was recorded as flying in September 1941. The K-420 retired from service from the Escola de Aviacão on 12 February 1943.
On 9 July 1939 an unidentified S.M. 79T flown by Major Rubens Canabarro Lucas set a speed record by flying from Porto Alegre to Rio in 2 hours and 50 minutes at an average speed of 423 km/h (263 mph).
On 29 June 1943 was the last flight of an S.M. 79T for the Brazilian Air Line made by K-422 piloted by pilot Maldonado.
The service of the S.M. 79T as a training aircraft ended on 25 October 1944 when K-421 and K-422 were officially grounded by the Escola de Aeronautica.
Civil Service
The I-TOMO, I-ROTR and the reconstructed I-LICA aircraft were modified with a cabin for 4 passengers, the rest of the plane was used for cargo transport. They were used for the Rome – Rio de Janeiro route since 1939 by the Italian civil airline Linea Aerea Transcontinentale Italiana or LATI (Eng: Italian Transcontinental Airlines) part of the Ala Littoria.
The three aircraft, whose name does not seem to be clear since some sources call them Savoia-Marchetti S.M. 79C, others S.M. 79T and others S.M. 79I, were used mainly for the transport of mail on the route Rome – Seville (Spain) – Lisbon (Portugal) – Villa Cisneros (Morocco) – Ilha do Sal (Cape Verde) – Recife (Brazil) – Rio de Janeiro.
At least one was diverted to the Regia Aeronautica in June 1940 when the Kingdom of Italy joined the Nazi Germany in the Second World War. The aircraft, I-ALAN was requisitioned by the Regia Aeronautica and used to transport military equipment from Italy to Abyssinia (Italian name for Ethiopia) while maintaining its civilian livery.
Unfortunately only 6 days after the beginning of the war, on the 16th of June 1940 the I-ALAN had some problems during a take-off from Benghazi in Libya and was forced to abort the departure.
During re-landing the undercarriage collapsed and the aircraft crashed on the runway without causing too much damage and without casualties.
The aircraft, impossible to repair due to lack of parts, was moved to the side of the runway and probably cannibalized for spare parts to be used on other Savoia-Marchetti.
The carcass of the I-ALAN remained abandoned on the side of the runway of Benghazi for a long time and the British troops found it there in February 1941 when they conquered the Libyan city.
Not much is known about the other two aircraft, but they were probably used on the Atlantic route together with the Savoia-Marchetti S.M. 83 (civil version of the S.M. 79) and the Savoia-Marchetti S.M. 75.
At the beginning the crossing was carried out weekly: departure on Thursday from the Italian territory and collecting the Italian mail on the way, then, landing in the two Iberian countries, the Spanish and Portuguese mail was collected, arriving in Brazil, the Brazilian mail directed to the three European countries was loaded and the return journey was made.
After June 10, 1940, with the Italian declaration of war against France and the United Kingdom, the transatlantic flight had to be reduced to only one crossing per month. They were finally stopped on December 19, 1941 as a result of the entry into war of the United States, which controlled the Atlantic airspace and especially because the US government forced Brazil to break all diplomatic relations with Fascist Italy and therefore also to block the possibility of using their airports.
Camouflage and Markings
The planes were painted in a very flamboyant livery: Ruby Red with green and white lines.
The rudder had the Italian tricolor with the Savoia coat of arms in the center.
The lictor beams, symbol of the Italian Fascist Party, were painted on the engine cowlings, while on the fuselage, under the cockpit was written “S.M. 79. Savoia-Marchetti”.
In the center of the fuselage, the aircraft codes were written on the sides, inside a white rectangle with black borders.
Also on the sides were painted three green mice intent on laughing at each other, this was the symbol of 205ª Squadriglia da bombardamento “Sorci Verdi”, and in fact, in Italian, “Sorci Verdi” means green mice.
This symbol will then also be painted on the S.M 79M of the squadron during the Spanish Civil War and the Second World War.
On the Savoia-Marchetti S.M. 79T the livery was the same except for the codename written bigger without the white rectangle, and also because on the tail was added a small white rectangle with the codename of the aircraft during the first race.
After being delivered to the Aviacao Militar Brasileira, the aircraft were repainted green, with a yellow rudder. Brazilian serial numbers were then applied, painted in black on the sides and the “Brazilian Stars” on the wings.
The livery of S.M. 79C converted for civilian use was on an ivory white background with a blue line on the side.
Behind the cockpit was the inscription ‘ALA LITTORIA S.A. LINEE ATLANTICHE’, S.A. stands for “Società per Azioni” in English Joint-stock Company, the identification mark (in that case) I-ALAN and a Kingdom of Italy flag on the tail.
The Avia S-199 was a post Second World War fighter produced in Czechoslovakia. A total of 532 airplanes of different versions were built and used by the Czechoslovenské letectvo (Czechoslovak Air Force) from 1947 to 1955, and 25 planes were used by the Israeli Air Force (IAF) of the newly formed State of Israel between 1948 and 1949.
After the Second World War, the fate of many European Jewish survivors of the Holocaust was bleak. Some returned to their homes across war-ravaged Europe, starting their lives from scratch. Others, who had lost entire families in the concentration camps or had lost everything for the war, decided to move to Palestine to establish the State of Israel.
Many of these, however, were blocked at the border of Palestine by the British, who were worried that the thousands of Jewish migrants could overrun the region. Others still ended up in British camps for displaced persons in Cyprus.
Some World War II veterans of different nationalities, Jewish or not, decided to take matters into their own hands. One such person was Lou Lenart ,who had lost 14 relatives in concentration camps, who wanted to retaliate and help displaced persons by joining the Haganah, an Israeli military organization, and becoming a so-called ‘Mahal’ ,Mitnadvei Hutz LaAretz’ or “volunteer from abroad”. During the Independence War, the Mahal numbered about 3,500 persons from 58 different countries. At the start of the hostilities, of the 18 fighter pilots of the Haganah, 15 were Mahal.
Czechoslovakian Necessity
After World War Two, Czechoslovakia had a shaky democracy dominated by communists, many of whom were of Jewish descent and pro-Zionist, despite discrimination and oppresion of Jewish people by the Soviets.
Czechoslovakia had found itself in possession of a large quantity of German weapons, many of which had been produced under occupation within its borders. Some types remained in production after the war ended with raw materials left in warehouses and factories or surrendered by the Anglo-Americans.
The Czechoslovakian arms stockpile would continue to grow as its soldiers returned, often with foreign supplied weapons.
Czechoslovakia was looking for a way to restore its economy, which was at an all-time low after the German occupation and the destruction caused by the war. Selling weapons was an excellent way to do this.
Mutual Aid
The Czech delegation to the UN voted for a Jewish state only a few months before a communist coup turned Czechoslovakia into a Soviet satellite state. Czechoslovakia then became one of the most important partners in helping arm the Jewish people.
Surplus German and Czech arms from World War II were purchased by the Czechoslovakian government and shipped to Palestine. Not only did they provide light weapons, but the country became a center for all forms of material aid.
While light weapons were important, the Israelis needed tanks and an air force to counter neighbouring Arab armies. All of this aid incurred a huge financial burden for the Czechs. Joseph Stalin allowed support to continue after the Czechoslovak communist coup, not so much as to support the Israelis, but to undermine the British Empire. The first contract was signed on January 14th, 1948 by Jan Masaryk, the Czech foreign minister.
The contract included 200 MG 34 machine guns, 4,500 K98 rifles, and 50,400,000 7.92 x 57 mm Mauser rounds for these rifles and machine guns.
Syria also purchased a quantity of weapons from Czechoslovakia for the Arab Liberation Army, but the shipment arrived in Israel due to the intervention of the Haganah.
After the communist coup in Czechoslovakia in February 1948, military support for the nascent state of Israel increased temporarily. However, Stalin’s brief policy of support for the state of Israel soon faded, and in the wake of the Tito-Stalin split, all Communist parties had to put their foreign policy on par with that of the Kremlin in order to prove their loyalty. In this context, the Czechoslovakian communists put an end to arms sales to Israel.
The first shipment of 200 rifles, 40 MG 34 machine guns and rounds landed secretly on the night of March 31st-April 1st 1948 at an improvised airport in Beit Daras on an American Douglas C-54 Skymaster cargo plane. The second larger shipment, covered with onions and potatoes, consisting of 450 rifles, 200 machine guns and rounds, arrived at the port of Tel Aviv aboard the merchant ship Nora on April 2nd, while a third shipment of ten thousand rifles, 1,415 machine guns and rounds reached Israel by sea on April 28th. Finally, the Haganah command had a stockpile of thousands of small arms on hand, but, as mentioned, other equipment was also needed to create an air force and armored units.
The Aircraft
In the final phase of the Second World War, it was decided that the factory of the Avia company located in Prague-Cakovice would assemble the Messerschmitt Bf109G-6, Bf109G-14 fighters and the Bf109G-12 two-seater trainer aircraft for the needs of the Luftwaffe. This production was based around components supplied by German factories.
After the war, a large stock of remaining spare parts was left and it was studied, along with the original blueprints, by the new authorities in order to begin local production of the aircraft. With the remaining spare parts, some aircraft were assembled, but there was a shortage of engines.
On 31st July 1945, at about 15:30, the ammunition depot at Krásný Březno exploded, killing 27 people and injuring several dozen more. The explosion and subsequent fire destroyed the depot, including the chemical plant buildings. The explosion was interpreted as being a result of sabotage carried out by the local Germans. In retaliation, the locals carried out the Ústí Massacre, killing about 80-100 ethnic Germans.
In addition to munitions, the warehouses that exploded also contained almost all Daimler-Benz DB 605 engines available in Czechoslovakia.
As a result, the Czechoslovak Air Force had to equip the aircraft with the Junkers Jumo 211 F-12 engine ,produced in Czechoslovakia as M-211F, of which there were several left after the war.
The Jumo 211 was not very suitable for installation on fighters, as it was originally intended only for bombers, such as the Heinkel He 111, Focke-Wulf Ta 154 and Junkers Ju 87. It was less powerful and heavier than the Daimler-Benz DB 605 engine, at 720 kg and 1,350 hp versus the DB 605AM’s 700 kg and 1,775 hp (on the Bf109G-14 variant).
In addition, the Junkers engines did not provide for the installation of synchronizers, so it was necessary for the Avia engineers to modify them to synchronize the turn of the propellers with the aircraft’s guns, and create a new propeller. The first Avia S-199 fighter ,C-210, took off on April 25th, 1947 from Prague-Kakovice airport, flown by test pilot Petr Široký. After solving some mechanical problems, the series production of the machine began almost immediately.
The Avia fighter differed from the original Messerschmitt Bf.109 only in terms of propulsion and armament. Because of the new engine, the engine cowling, propeller, and spinner were modified.
The armament of the S-199 consisted of two 13 mm Mauser MG 131 machine guns with 600 rounds above the engine, and either two 7.92 mm machine guns in the wings or two 20 mm MG 151 cannons mounted under the wings in gunpods.
Because of the new engine, the Czechoslovakian aircraft was inferior to the German Bf 109 G-10. The maximum speed of the S-199 was 590 km/h compared to 690 km/h of the Messerschmitt. The maximum altitude was 9,000 m compared to 11,000 m. The worst problem was the change in the center of gravity of the aircraft, which greatly complicated takeoff and landing.
The S-199 had another serious defect: the machine guns placed under the engine hood were not always synchronized with the propeller, which led to serious accidents.
Several plants were set up for the production and assembly of the Avia S-199, the Prague Automobile Plant, Plant No. 2 of Avia, and the plants of the Aero company where they assembled the aircraft. Rudders and ailerons were supplied by Letecké Závody in Letňany. The Letov company in Malešice produced the M-211 engines and the propellers and spinners were manufactured in Jinonice.
A total of 450 S-199 single-seaters and 82 CS-199 two-seaters were produced for training purposes, of which 24 were later converted from single-seater fighters.
First Aircrafts
The Czechoslovaks helped create the Israeli Air Force by selling the nascent Israeli state 25 Avia S-199 fighter planes in 1948.
The agreed cost was 180,000 USD (~2 million USD adjusted for inflation) per aircraft, including armament, ammunition, spare parts, pilot training and support equipment. This was a disproportionate price for what was, by now, a mediocre aircraft. At that time, an American surplus P-51D Mustang was sold second hand for only 4,000 USD (~44,000 USD adjusted for inflation).
Unfortunately, due to the embargoes imposed on Israel, it would have taken weeks or months to find other offers, time that Israel did not have given the conflict with the neighboring Arab states. A few weeks could make the difference between destruction and survival for the new state.
David Ben Gurion, the Prime Minister of Israel, did not hesitate and gave the order to buy the planes and to send the pilots to training as quickly as possible. A contract was signed for 25 Avia S-199 at a total cost of 4.5 million USD (~50 million adjusted for inflation).
Pilot Training
The first 10 Israeli pilots departed from Sde Dov on 6th May 1948 and arrived at the Czechoslovakian air base in České Budějovice on May 11th, 1948. Of the 10 pilots, 2 were US volunteers and one was South African, these last three were veteran pilots of the Second World War, having served with the US Army Air Force and Royal South African Air Force respectively. The other seven were British or Palestinian Jews, some of which were World War II veterans, while others had only completed Royal Air Force training in Rhodesia in early 1945, failing to actively participate in World War II.
The first to fly the Czechoslovakian fighter was former Marine Corps pilot Lou Lenart. As soon as he started to gain speed, due to the larger propeller, the aircraft started to yaw to the left. He was aware of this problem but he was likely unable to do anything about it.
When he returned to the runway, he managed to take off after several attempts, having to fight against the plane to avoid going off the runway. After a few minutes, he returned to the airfield and the pilot again had to fight to keep the plane straight during landing.
When all 10 pilots made their first flights, they gave their impressions of the plane. None were positive. The landing gear was narrow and made the S-199 difficult to keep straight during take off due to the huge torque of the propeller. The plane was unwieldy and very hard to handle, the cockpit was cramped and the canopy was hard to open.
The Jewish volunteers discovered that the Czech pilots called the S-199 ‘Mezec’, which means “mule,” and they quickly understood why.
The Jewish volunteers were accustomed to spacious, agile and fast Allied fighters, such as the Spitfire, P-51D Mustang and P-47 Thunderbolt. The shock of flying an aircraft with completely different characteristics upset them, but the Avia was all they had and they had to make do.
After only 4 days from the beginning of the training, on May 15th, the pilots of the Sherut Avir, Air Service in Hebrew, the ancestor of the Israeli Air Force, were recalled to Israel.
During training in Czechoslovakia, only five of the volunteers, those with World War II experience, had qualified to fly the Avia and none had flown it more than twice. The first S-199s were disassembled and loaded, along with other equipment, onto a Douglas C-54 Skymaster named Black-5. This plane landed on May 20th, 1948 at Be’er Tuvia, 40 km south of Tel Aviv, with the first disassembled Avia S-199, some bombs, Avia’s machine-gun rounds for the aircraft’s guns, artillery spare parts, and five fighter pilots who had “completed” their training in Czechoslovakia, American Lou Lanart, American Milton Rubenfeld (former RAF and USAF), South African Eddie Cohen (former RAF), Israeli Ezer Weizmann (former RAF) and Israeli Mordecai ‘Modi’ Alon (former RAF).
On the night between 23rd and 24th May 1948, one of the Douglas C-54 Skymasters carrying the fifth Avia for the fifth pilot crashed during landing due to poor visibility. The navigator, Moses Rosenbaum, died crushed by the fuselage of the Avia S-199 they were carrying, while the other three crew members were only injured.
Some sources report that the number of Avia S-199s that arrived in Israel was only 24. This could be a simple error or it could mean that Czechoslovakia delivered all the Avia but that the one that crashed on the night of May 23rd, perhaps because of the damage suffered, could not fly anymore and was used for spare parts.
Operational Use
The Israeli Air Force gave the Czechoslovakian fighter the nickname “סכין”, meaning “knife” in Hebrew. After being reassembled, the aircraft received the Israeli air force’s coat of arms and a number ranging from 100 to 125 for identification.
After the outbreak of hostilities, the war was going badly for the State of Israel, which had been invaded by anArab force composed of Egyptians, Syrians and Iraqis with the support of other nations such as Jordan and Lebanon. The Egyptian Army was advancing north along the Mediterranean coast, arriving less than 30 km from Tel Aviv.
Despite the fact that the Israeli engineers of the Givati Brigade had blown up the bridge over the Lachish river, the Egyptians continued to amass along the south bank of the river. It would take them a few hours to repair the bridge and they could arrive in Tel Aviv during the next day.
That evening, the last phases of the assembly of the first four aircraft had been completed in a hangar. An attack was being organized for the following days against the Royal Egyptian Air Force airport in El Arish, in order to take the REAF by surprise and announce in a very daring way the existence of the IAF.
Due to the proximity of the Egyptians to Tel Aviv, the Israeli pilots were ordered to take off with the only four S-199s that had arrived from Czechoslovakia. The planes had not yet been tested in flight, not all four had radios and those that had them did not work. The guns had never been tested, not even during the training of the pilots, who had flown on these fighters only twice.
The four S-199s, piloted by Lou Lenart, Ezer Weizman, Modi Alon and Leonard Cohen, took off one hour before dark. Lenart, who commanded the unit, had never flown in Israel before, and he did not know where Ashdod, which was less than 15 km away from their airport, was located.
Anachronistically, he gestured to the other pilots the direction to go. Having clarified the direction to go, there was another problem, as the villages along the coast looked similar. Fortunately, columns of smoke were seen and, shortly afterwards, a column of Egyptian trucks and light armored vehicles was spotted stretching for more than a mile south of the Ashdod bridge. These belonged to engineering units trying to repair the bridge for the forces that were to take Tel Aviv the next day.
The pilots of the four planes attacked the column, which immediately dispersed. The Egyptians were not aware of the existence of an Israeli air force, lacked sufficient anti-aircraft weapons and, in some cases, had never seen an aircraft before.
The fighters swooped down on the Arabs, dropped the two 70 kg bombs they had and started to strafe the scattering soldiers. After a few shots, the guns jammed. In reality, the bombs and the following machine gun strafing did little damage. However, the psychological impact on the Egyptian troops was so devastating that, the next day, the order to attack Tel Aviv was cancelled. After that, the Egyptian offensive strategy became purely defensive.
During the attack, South African Leonard ‘Eddie’ Cohen’s Red Four plane was shot down by anti-aircraft fire. Cohen was the first loss of the Israeli Air Force. During landing, Modi Alon’s Red Two aircraft went off the runway and was damaged.
At 0530 hrs on May 30th, in order to take advantage of the surprise appearance of the IAF, the two remaining S-199s, piloted by Weizman ,Red 1, and Milt Rubenfeld,Red 3, attacked the village of Tulkarm in northern Israel, which controlled by a Jordanian-Iraqi force.
In this case as well, the real damage was insignificant but the psychological effect was devastating. A bomb had hit the police station where the Arabs were hiding themselves and 4 tanks were machine-gunned.
Rubenfeld’s plane was hit, probably by two anti-aircraft cannon shots, one in the wing and one in the fuselage. Due to the damage sustained by the aircraft, he could only return to the territory controlled by the Israeli Defense Force and then bail out at low altitude into the sea. He jumped from about 370 meters, but the parachute did not open properly and he fell into the water and was injured. He swam towards the shore, andafter two hours, he realized that the water in which he was swimming was very shallow and he had reached land.
He became the target of rifle shots from a nearby kibbutz, being mistaken for an Arab pilot ,the Israeli Air Force had remained a secret until the day before. He was then rescued and, after treatment, brought back by cab to Tel Aviv and then returned to the United States.
On May 30th, the unit was officially named the 101st Squadron or First Fighter Squadron, a name that was very impressive for a unit that had two fighters, one of which was operational, and four pilots, one of which was wounded.
On June 3rd, 1948, two Douglas C-47 Dakotas, escorted by two Egyptian Supermarine Spitfires, arrived from over the sea to bomb Tel Aviv. This practice had been ongoing for a long time and had cost the lives of hundreds of civilians in the city. The Egyptian tactic was to drop bombs out the back door onto the city below.
That day, late in the afternoon, 101st Squadron was alarmed that the Egyptian bombers were again on their way to Tel Aviv. Modi Alon took the only available S-199 and took off.
Arriving in the skies over the city, he spotted the two C-47s with two Spitfires escorting them.
Modi Alon first flew west over the Mediterranean Sea, thus being able to approach with the sun behind him. The enemy aircraft would thus have a hard time seeing him, a tactic RAF instructors in Rhodesia had taught him.
Arriving behind the first C-47, he hit it with a long burst of cannons and machine guns and sent it crashing to the ground. With a very risky maneuver, he passed in front of a Supermarine Spitfire and then turned around again to attack the second C-47 head-on.
The slow and clumsy Douglas tried to turn around to get rid of the attacker while the two Spitfires tried to line up the Avia, trying to hit it to defend the bomber.
Alon’s S-199 shots hit the second C-47, which crashed into the Mediterranean shortly after. Alon then pushed the throttle to full and sped away at top speed, without the Spitfires being able to hit it.
On June 8th, 1948, during his first mission aboard an S-199, Gideon Lichtman, who had trained for only 35 minutes aboard the Avia, flew the first dogfight of the war against an Egyptian Spitfire that was strafing civilians in Tel Aviv.
Lichtman didn’t even know which trigger to fire, so he kept pressing buttons, levers and switches until he found the right one, and chasing one of the Spitfires, he opened fire, shooting it down. The U.S. pilot was forced to land without fuel because he had only 40 minutes of fuel when he intercepted the enemy plane.
Exactly one month later, on July 8, (some other sources claim 18 July) Modi Alon left with other 2 Avias to attack an Egyptian reinforcement column at Bir Asluj in the Negev Desert.
After the successful attack, on their way back Alon noticed two Egyptian Spitfires Mark VCs in flight, attacked them and managed to shoot down one of them which was the one of the Wing Commander Said Afifi al-Janzuri.
Although the career of the few Israeli Avias seemed good, due to its poor handling characteristics on the ground, no more than four planes were operational together, recalled pilot Mitchell Flint, veteran of the Pacific Campaign.
On the morning of July 9 Lou Lenart was ordered to attack the Egyptian air base of El Arish with four fighters. The fuel was low and the tanks could not be filled to capacity.
During takeoff the Avia S-199 number two piloted by ex-USAF aviator Stan Andrews swerved to the left during takeoff, flipped over and blocked the runway for 15 minutes causing the other fighters to consume fuel.
The three remaining operational S-199s running out of fuel hit the much closer Egyptian-controlled Gaza port.
Only two S-199s returned to base while the third, piloted by former USAF Bob Vickman, had not returned. Despite efforts Vickman was never found again.
The next day there was a similar situation, a pair of S-199s attacked two Syrian bombers near the Sea of Galilee. Ex-RAF pilot Maury Mann, shot down one of the two bombers within seconds while his South African ex-RAF wingman Lionel Bloch , in aircraft 108 .ד, attacked the second one chasing it as it retreated into Syria.That was the last time Bloch was seen, neither he nor his S-199 returned to base.
The next morning Sydney ‘Syd’ Cohen, a former South African medical student, member of 101 Squadron and future leader of the squadron, took off to search for Bloch or the remains of his plane.
Syd had spent more time training in Czechoslovakia so he realized that there was something wrong with the disappearance of two planes in two days, he acted on instinct and fired a very short burst with the machine guns mounted in the engine cowling.
When he landed, everyone noticed that all three propeller blades had bullet holes in them. The synchronizer was faulty, Vickman, Bloch and some thought also Leonard Cohen had all likely shot their own propellers while firing their guns.
On October 16, 1948, Airman Rudy Augarten, a former USAF pilot who had shot down two Messerschmitt Bf.109s during World War II, was on a reconnaissance mission over El Arish Air Base, which had been attacked the previous day. As he flew south toward the coast in the distance, he saw two Spitfires flying in formation.
Augarten followed the two Egyptian planes, trying not to be detected.
Augarten lined up with one of the Spitfires and fired a burst, sending the Egyptian plane plunging toward the Israeli lines. The other Spitfire, pursued by Augarten’s wingman Leon Frankel, fled the battle.
That same day Alon and Weizmann departed at 1658 hrs for a mission near Ashdod where both had done the first IAF mission. After the success of the mission Alon had returned and during the approach to the runway he reported by radio that he had a problem with the landing gear, a common problem on Avias that was never solved. One or both of the pistons that lowered the struts would not extend fully. The Israeli pilots learned the hard way that they had to pull the nose of the fighter up and down to get the landing gear fully retracted into the wing.
While Alon was working out his problem, observers on the ground noticed something more troubling. A trail of gray smoke was coming out of his fighter’s nose.
Alon was told over the radio to check the temperatures of the plane’s various gauges. “They were fine” Alon replied seconds before his fighter crashed in flames next to the runway, killing him. His daughter born 6 months later could not meet him but served in the same squadron as her father.
From that moment on, the Avia S-199 were more and more rarely used by the Israelis.
Very few of them were still operational and, starting from September 25, 1948, about fifty ex-Czech Supermarine Spitfires IX were arriving in Israel, which would have been much more reliable.
The S-199 fighters flew with the Coat of Arms of the Israeli Air Force until June 1949.
The aircraft maintained the Czechoslovakian sand coloration but the Israeli Air Force coat of arms (Stars of David) were applied in light blue on a white circular background on the sides of the fuselage and on the wings, top and bottom.
During the first missions the Stars of David were painted without paying attention to size, but later they were painted in standard size. Behind the David’s Star there were three bends white-light blue-white and the Israeli identification number, from 100 .ד to 125 .ד.
In front of the propeller nosepiece (which was painted red or blue in some cases) was painted the 101 Squadron coat of arms, a skull with wings inscribed in a red circle.
From September 1948 the rudders were painted with red and white oblique lines but photographic evidence shows that not all aircraft received them, at least until December 1948.
At least one aircraft, towards the end of the war, was painted in two-tone camouflage, dark brown and sand yellow with the underside of the aircraft in Mediterranean blue.
Conclusion
The Avia S-199, although an extremely unreliable aircraft, was the first aircraft of the Israeli Air Force, the only one that at that time they could acquire due to UN embargoes.
During the 13 months of IAF service the Israeli pilots shot down a total of 8 Arab aircraft without losing a single Avia to Arab aircraft.
The major losses were due to mechanical problems of the aircraft leading to the conclusion that the Avia S-199s were more dangerous for the Israeli pilots than for the Arab pilots.
The Macchi M.C. 200 ‘Saetta’ (Lightning) was a fighter aircraft developed by Aeronautica Macchi (AerMacchi) of Italy around the mid-1930s, resulting in one of the most produced and used aircraft of the Regia Aeronautica (Italian Royal Air Force) during the Second World War. It yielded good results on all fronts where the Italian forces operated, from the hot and dusty desert of North Africa, to the cold and snowy Russian steppes.
After 8th September 1943, both the Luftwaffe and Aeronautica Nazionale Repubblicana (Eng: Italian National Air Force) on the Axis side, and the Aeronautica Cobaelligerante Italiana (Eng: Italian Co-belligerent Air Force) on the Allied side used the surviving aircraft.
After the war, the Aeronautica Militare (Eng: Italian Military Air Force) used the few Macchi 200 that were still functioning for another two years, until 1947, for training tasks.
Development
Before the Macchi 200, the Regia Aeronautica was equipped with fighter biplanes, such as the FIAT C.R. 30 and C.R. 32, which were considered among the best biplanes produced in Europe at the time.
During the early 1930s the Regia Aeronautica had in service some of the best biplanes of the world, not for nothing it was considered one of the best air forces in the world, with records in both civilian and military spheres.
In the mid-30s it became clear to the Italians that the biplane configuration was more than outdated and they needed new, state-of-the-art, low-wing, all-metal monoplane aircraft, and, only one year after the biplane FIAT C.R. 32 appeared in 1935, the leaders of the Royal Air Force issued a request for a new aircraft.
On 10th February 1936, the Direzione Generale Costruzioni Aeronautiche or DGCA ( General Directorate of Aeronautical Construction) requested the development of a low-wing monoplane ground interceptor fighter with retractable landing gear. The maximum speed was to be 500 km/h (310 mph), with a range of 2 hours, and a climb rate of 6,000 meters (19,685 ft) in 5 minutes. The requested armament was to be composed of one or two 12.7 mm (.50 in) machine guns, the engine had to be the FIAT A.74 radial with an entirely metal fuselage.
The largest aeronautical companies in Italy responded to this order. Aeronautica Macchi presented the Macchi M.C. 200, FIAT Aeronautica, a subsidiary of FIAT, had the FIAT G.50, Aeronautica Umbra S.A. (AUSA) had the AUSA AUT 18, Caproni the Caproni Vizzola F.5 and Industrie Meccaniche Aeronautiche Meridionali (IMAM) had the IMAM Ro. 51.
In 1938, Officine Meccaniche Reggiane also responded to the request by presenting the Reggiane Re. 2000 which did not see great success, however it was used to develop the more powerful Re. 2001 and Re. 2002.
Two winning projects were chosen. The Macchi M.C. 200 was found to have excellent flying characteristics, meeting most requirements that were stipulated in the original request. The FIAT G.50 was not as highly praised, but still accepted into service. The prototypes of both aircraft first flew in 1937, and both would enter service in 1939.
The Macchi MC 200 was designed by a team of engineers led by Mario Castoldi (1888-1968), a successful designer who had already worked on the Macchi M. 39 and M.C. 72, the latter still holding the speed record for a seaplane powered by a non-standard engine.
The initials M.C. stood for Macchi-Castoldi to emphasize the prestige that the company gave to its chief engineer.
Prototypes
Hastily produced, the prototype, with serial number MM. 336 (Matricola Militare; Military Serial Number), flew for the first time on 24th December 1937 from the Lonate Pozzolo runway, piloted by test pilot Giuseppe Burei that I judge the driving of the aircraft positively. Due to Burei’s untimely death during a flight test of the seaplane Macchi M.C.94, the subsequent test flights of the first prototype were conducted by Ambrogio Colombo.
On March 1st, 1938, Colombo was asked to impress the ministerial commission composed of General Ferdinando Raffaelli, Lieutenant Colonel Torre and Major Lippi. The reason for this request was simple. Macchi was late with developing the aircraft. FIAT and IMAM had already completed test flights months before, and there was a risk that the Macchi fighter would not be taken into consideration by the Regia Aeronautica.
During the exhibition flight for the commission, Ambrogio Colombo performed 38 exercises with the prototype fully loaded and at an altitude of 3,300 meters (10,827 ft).
There were no major differences between the first and second prototypes apart from a few small details, such as a one-piece rear canopy, anti-rollover structure and shorter exhaust pipes.
On 11th June 1938, during the test flights at the Guidonia runway with the 1° Centro Sperimentale Aviazione (1st Experimental Aviation Center), the body responsible for evaluating aircraft for the Regia Aeronautica, it was found that the aircraft tended to flipping if turns were too tight, with consequent loss of control (in 1940, two pilots of the 1st Wing, Lieutenant Tinti and Sergeant Major De Bernardinis, were killed during training on 1st March and in May due to this problem).
Mario Castoldi immediately began to design new wings to solve the problem (which was common to all the monoplanes presented for the competition), a solution that would take an excessive amount of time to design and implement.
Engineer Sergio Stefanutti of the Società Aeronautica Italiana Ambrosini (another Italian aeronautical company), was commissioned by the Experimental Aviation Center to find the cause of the Macchi’s control problems, solved the problem more simply, by gluing layers of balsa wood on the center and ends of the wings. Castoldi did not waste time, and the new wings were then mounted on the successor of the ‘Saetta’, the Macchi M.C. 202.
Around 1941, some Seattas of the 1st Fighter Wing, belonging to the first production series, were withdrawn from first line service due to the problems with the defective wing profile.
With this problem corrected, the Macchi M.C. 200 proved to be a reliable, manageable aircraft. Despite the radial engine, it still had enough speed to compete with the Hawker Hurricane, which it bested in combat maneuverability, but was outmatched in firepower. As the war went on, the Saetta’s maneuverability, sturdy construction, and the reliability of the radial engine were the fighter’s only remaining strengths.. Primarily thanks to the experience of the pilots did the type manage to obtain some aerial victories.
The prototype serial number MM 336 remained in the Breda factory for a period of time, and was then returned to Macchi on 23rd August 1940, where it was left in disrepair. Due to the lack of engines caused by the war, at an unknown date, the MM 336’s engine was disassembled and mounted on the Macchi M.C. 200 serial number MM 8836. The prototype, without the engine, returned to Varese in September 1942 and from there, nothing more is known about it.
The second prototype was used for camouflage tests after the conclusion of flight tests, before being overhauled and sent to Rimini.
Structure
The structure of the MC 200 was entirely metal, a big step forward for the Italian aircraft industry at the time. The only other Italian aircraft with an all-metal structure before the MC 200 was the Breda Ba. 27, of which only 14 units were produced and otherwise remained at the prototype stage, along with the competing FIAT G. 50.
The new fuselage turned out to be quite robust, but was heavier, and let to longer production times It was made of molded duralumin and was covered with super avional plates (a special duralumin alloy) riveted with countersunk-head rivets, reducing aerodynamic drag.
Like the fuselage, the wings, mounted on the lower part of the fuselage, were also a single structure consisting of two spars with ailerons and ventral flaps. The whole wing structure was made of duralumin, apart from the ailerons, which retained the doped and painted canvas.
The prototype Macchi prototypes were equipped with a constant airfoil that increased the speed by a few kilometers per hour but caused autorotation problems which risked making the aircraft impossible to maneuver with the risk that the pilot could not even parachute out. On the production models, this was replaced by a variable airfoil.
Cockpit
The cockpit had a single hand-control column. On the left side was the throttle, along with the controls for take-off and the flaps controls. The instrument panel had a gyroscope, speedometer, altimeter and other basic instruments for flight and an onboard ammunition gauge that ran up to 650 rounds per weapon. In the center of the instrument panel was the compass with a San Giorgio collimator located just above, for aiming the onboard armament.
On the first series of the Macchi MC 200, the windshield was a 5 centimeter (1.96 in) thick piece of glass, and the steel pilot’s seat had a thickness of about 3 centimeters (1.18 in) to protect the pilot. Behind the seat were oxygen cylinders, and those of the fire extinguishing system. The ARC 1 radio system and its batteries were located in front of the cockpit.
From the 26th Macchi MC 200 produced onward, a new tubular roll bar was introduced behind the armored seat. This was meant to protect the pilot if the plane landed inverted. It is not clear whether this was introduced after an accident or as a precaution. However, from the 3rd Series onward, this feature was again eliminated, the cockpit was open and unpressurized, and the rear canopy, no longer made of glass, was reinforced to act as the anti-roll structure.
The semi enclosed cockpit was introduced in August 1941, starting from the 12th aircraft of the 5th production series of Macchi and starting from the 65th aircraft of the 1st production series of Breda.
In the late production versions, an antenna fixed to the back of the canopy was added. This reduced the reception problems of the onboard radio.
Landing Gear
There were several types of landing gear covers used on the Macchi MC 200. On the first prototypes, the landing gear door completely covered the strut and the wheel. During landing, the lowest part was raised to avoid hitting the ground. This version was very complex to manage, and in case of malfunction the landing gear would break. Often the planes were forced to take off on makeshift runways on lawns, in case of malfunction the cover, due to the speed, would be stuck in the ground causing the breakage of the strut or worse, that the plane would fall on one side leading to the total destruction of the fuselage and wings.
The models of the first series adopted a different type of outer landing gear doors, with a small inner gear door at the wing attachment points.
The rear wheel on the first 146 examples was retractable, which slightly increased top speed but slowed production. In addition, during firefights, enemy fire could damage the mechanism that lowered and raised the wheel, leading to the risk that it would not come out during landing.
The tires were of the FAST type, produced by Pirelli of Milan. The dimensions of the front ones were 236 x 85 x 79 inches, while the rear wheel model had the Spiga type, also made by Pirelli, which was 82 x 31 inches.
Engine
The M.C.200 engine was the radial two-row FIAT Aeronautica 74 RC 38 ‘Ciclone’ ( Cyclone). It had 14 cylinders and was air-cooled, with a displacement of 31.25 liters (1,907 in³).
It had been developed by Engineer Tranquillo Zerbi and Professor Antonio Fessia based on the American Pratt & Whitney R-1535. The 600 kg (1,322 lbs) engine delivered a take-off power of 870 hp at 2,500 rpm, 840 hp at 2,400 rpm at an altitude of 3,800 meters (12,467 ft), and a maximum power of 960 hp at 3,000 rpm, which could only be maintained for short periods.
This engine guaranteed a maximum speed of 503 km/h (313 m/h) at 4,500 meters (14,763 ft). Its low fuel consumption also guaranteed a range of 570 km (354 miles) with two fuel tanks, one in the wings and the other under the cockpit, and a third auxiliary tank behind the pilot’s seat. In total, there were 313 liters (82.6 US gallons) of fuel. This could be extended to 870 km (540 miles) with an external tank of 450 liters (118 US gallon), at an average speed of 465 km/h (288 m/h) at an average height of 6,000 meters (16,685 ft) . Its climb rate was 6,000 meters in 7 minutes and 33 seconds.
This engine, despite being outdated in performance and power compared to the most contemporary modern in-line engines of the war, was appreciated by pilots and technicians for its simplicity, ease of maintenance and ease of operation. This was true even in unsuitable climates, such as the deserts of North Africa and the freezing Russian steppes. However, there were problems with the carburetors that had quality issues in addition to not being suitable for such extreme climates.
The engine cowling featured “bubbles” that protected the rocker arms of the cylinders.
This allowed a decrease of the diameter of the cowling, increasing visibility compared to the G. 50, which was equipped with the same engine.
In June 1940, all Fiat A.74 engines, produced under license by Reggiane, were replaced due to failures that brought oil temperatures to dangerous levels after an inspection by a captain of the Aeronautical Engineers and an engineer of the company.
In the first series, the cockpit was equipped with a fully enclosed canopy, which was prone to several problems. Over time, the glass became opaque which affected visibility, and it was also difficult to open above a certain airspeed, so it was opted to go for an open cockpit with only frontal protection.
The new fighters were required to have variable pitch propellers. On the two prototypes, and on the first 25 specimens produced, the propeller was the three-blade FIAT-Hamilton 34D-1. The first 25 production planes were equipped with an aerodynamic spinner to protect the propeller hub but. From the 26th plane onwards, the Piaggio P. 1001 propeller, designed by Castoldi himself, was mounted with the spinner removed. In both cases, the propellers had a diameter of 3.05 meters.
Armament
The armament consisted of two 12.7 mm (.50 in) Breda-SAFAT machine guns positioned on the engine cowling and synchronized with the propeller. They weighed 29 kg (64 lbs) each and were fed with two 370-round 12.7 x 81 mm SR Breda belts. This ammunition developed from British Vickers .5 V/565 Semi-Rimmed round.
There were various types of bullets produced by the Società Italiana Ernesto Breda per Costruzioni Meccaniche and by the Società Anonima Fabbrica Armi Torino (SAFAT). In addition to the classic full metal jacket bullet, the weapon could fire ammunition produced in Italy of the following types: tracer, perforating, explosive-incendiary, and explosive-incendiary-tracer (or multi-effect).
On average, these bullets weighed 34 grams each, for a total of 25.160 kilograms (55.46 lbs) of ammunition. The machine-gun firing rate was 700 rpm, but this was decreased to 574 rpm when synchronized with the propeller.
Although quite powerful, these machine guns proved insufficient to deal with enemy threats as the war continued. Another big problem encountered was the small number of rounds on board. Only 740 rounds guaranteed just over a minute of continuous fire.
After the 25th plane, the machine guns were equipped with a flash hider so as to not blind the pilot when firing. The ammunition reserve was also increased to 740 rounds, as it consisted of only 600 rounds in total on the first planes. The spent cartridges, after being shot, were not ejected from the plane but stored onboard, so that they could be reused.
In 1937, engineer Castoldi proposed the adoption of two 7.7 mm (.303 in) Breda-SAFAT machine guns in the wings to the Regia Aeronautica. This required a consequent strengthening of the wing structure, and subsequent loss of speed, but the proposal was ignored.
On the Macchi MC 200CB, or Cacciabombardiere (fighter-bomber), version, the aircraft was equipped with two 3 kg (1.86 lbs) underwing pylons, capable of carrying bombs weighing up to 160 kg (353 lbs) each.
The bombs were used for infantry support missions. Although the maximum load was 320 kg (705 lbs), four 15 kg bombs (33 lbs) per pylon were commonly carried .
The aircraft could also carry two bombs up to a maximum of 160 kg (353 lbs) each or two 150-liter (40 US gallons) auxiliary tanks, increasing the range. The two 150-liter tanks could also be equipped together with the 450-liter centerline tank, effectively doubling the aircraft’s maximum range.
In Italy
The first M.C. 200s were ready in the spring of 1939 and were delivered to the Regia Aeronautica during the same year. As of September 1st, 1939, 29 Macchi M.C. 200s had been delivered, of which 25 were allocated to front-line units, with the others given to flight training schools. In comparison, the Regia Aeronautica had 19 FIAT G. 50s and 143 FIAT C.R. 42s.
At the time of the Kingdom of Italy’s entry into the war on the 10th of June 1940, the number of M.C.200s in the Regia Aeronautica was 156. Of these, only 103 were in the front-line units and not all were combat ready. Similarly, there was in increase in other fighters on hand with 118 FIAT G. 50s and 300 FIAT CR 42s.
These 156 aircraft were split between different units, such as the 16º Gruppo Autonomo da Caccia Terrestre (16th Autonomous Land Fighter Group) of the XVI° Gruppo (16th Group) and the 181ª Squadriglia (181st Squadron) of the 6° Gruppo Caccia (6th Fighter Group) of the 1º Stormo Caccia Terrestre (1st Ground Fighter Wing), based at an unknown airport in Sicily.
7 Saetta had gone to the 369ª Squadriglia, 6 to the 370ª Squadriglia and 6 to the 371ª Squadriglia of the 152º Gruppo commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Giovanni Melotti, based at Vergiate airport in Lombardy. Another 7 Macchi MC 200 were in service with the 372ª Squadriglia, 6 with the 373ª Squadriglia and 6 with the 374ª Squadriglia of the 153º Gruppo of Captain Alberto Benefonti at the Caselle airport. The 152º Gruppo and 153º Gruppo were under the command of the 54º Stormo of Colonel Enrico Guglielmotti, with headquarters in Airasca.
The very first Macchi aircraft were delivered to the 91ª Squadriglia of the 10º Gruppo of the 4º Stormo, which was considered an elite unit. The 4th Wing received the MC 200 shortly before entering the war, but preferred to go to battle in Libya with the old FIAT CR 42 biplanes in late June 1940.
The reason for this downgrade was that the pilots of the 4° Stormo were all veterans of the Spanish Civil War, or possessed years of experience in aerobatic performances around the world, and were far more accustomed to their FIAT C.R. 32 and C.R. 42 biplanes. While they received the latest generation monoplane fighters, they did not have enough time to properly train on them, and subsequently turned down the opportunity to fly the Macchi M.C. 200.
It should also be emphasized that the pilots of the 4th Wing were the only ones not to appreciate the Macchi initially. On October 23rd, 1939, a few weeks after delivery, General Velardi, commander of another air unit, wrote to the General Staff of the Italian Royal Army that his pilots were more than satisfied with the new plane, and that within a few weeks of training they could use the new Macchi for aerobatic performances.
The first victim of the new Macchi MC 200 was a British Short S.25 Sunderland four-engined seaplane on a reconnaissance mission on 1st November 1940, near Augusta in Sicily.
In the last weeks of December 1940, the pilots of the 181st Squadron of the 6th Fighter Group of the 1st Ground Fighter Wing had the task of escorting the Junkers Ju 87 ‘Stuka’ dive bombers of the I/StG.1 and II/StG.2 of the X Fliegerkorps. The Messerschmitt Bf 109 of 7./JG 26, which were supposed to escort the Stukas on their missions to Malta, had not yet arrived in Sicily.
During this mission, the Saettas proved effective and without any particular defects in dogfighting against the Hawker Hurricane. They were able to outclass the old Gloster Gladiator biplanes without much difficulty.
In Sicily, two Saettas of the 70th Squadron of the 23rd Autonomous Fighter Group based at Boccadifalco airport were used for night missions. Lieutenant Colonel Tito Falconi, commander of the group and Captain Claudio Solaro, commander of the squadron, were, according to documents, the only ones to fly the two Macchi at night.
According to the documents, between September and December 1941, these two fighters flew dozens of missions over Palermo, also participating in several engagements against British aircraft, but without managing to shoot any down. By the end of the year, the 23rd Group was sent back to the Turin Mirafiori airport to be reorganized.
After the North African Campaign, in July 1943, Allied troops invaded Sicily. At that time, the Regia Aeronautica had 81 Macchi M.C. 200, 41 with the 2nd Wing, 3 in the 22nd Group, 13 in the 157th Group, 4 in the 161st Group and 20 aircraft in the 82nd and 392nd Squadrons.
One of the last battles occurred a few days before the Armistice of Cassibile in September 1943. On 2nd September 1943, while on patrol around the naval base at the port of La Spezia, Lieutenant Petrosellini of the 92nd Squadron of the 8th Group intercepted a group of 24 American Boeing B-17 Flying Fortresses that were approaching to bomb the port facilities and industrial areas of the city. Petrosellini carried out two attacks on the behemoth US bombers alone, managing to shoot down one and damage a second. He then performed an emergency landing on Sarzana airport due to damage sustained from heavy defensive fire.
As of the 8th of September 1943, 33 Macchi M.C. 200 were in the ranks of the Regia Aeronautica.
Until September 1943, the ‘Saetta’ was the most widely used Italian fighter on all fronts. The first examples of its successor, the Macchi M.C. 202, entered front-line service in late September 1941, with the first examples of Macchi M.C. 205V appearing in February 1943.
Malta
Malta, or “L’Isola Maledetta” (The Damned Island), a British stronghold in the Mediterranean, was the setting for dozens of air battles in which the Macchi M.C. 200 took part.
Just above the Island of Malta, the first loss of an M.C. 200, a casualty of the Royal Air Force, was recorded on 23rd June, 1940. Nine Macchi M.C. 200s of the 79th Squadron, eight of the 88th Squadron, and one of the 81st Squadron, all belonging to the 6th Group, escorted ten Savoia Marchetti SM.79s of the 11th Bomber Wing to the island.
Immediately, the British launched two Gloster Gladiators to intercept them. Sergeant Major Molinelli of the 71st Squadron attacked one of the two British planes that were, in turn, attacking a bomber off Sliema. The ‘Saetta’ was hit and fell into the sea. It is not clear whether Major Molinelli survived.
Franco Lucchini, an Italian ace of the 90th Squadron of the 10th Fighter Group of the 4th Wing with 26 kills, took off on 27th June 1941 from Trapani Airport in Sicily. He was on an attack mission during which he shot down a Hawker Hurricane. Afterward, he shared many other victories with his companions of the 4th Wing.
Another loss recorded occurred on the morning of 25th July 1941, when about 40 Macchi M.C. 200s of the 54th Wing and were tasked with escorting a CANT Z.1007bis of the 30th Wing for photographic reconnaissance on Valletta. The mission was meant to photograph an English naval convoy that had been attacked the day before by torpedo bombers.
Above the island, about 30 Hurricanes descended upon the formation, causing the CANT Z. 1007 bis to fall into flames. The Saetta of second Lieutenant Liberti was shot down, with the loss of the pilot, as was that of Lieutenant De Giorgi, whose fate is unknown. The Italian fighter pilots declared the downing of four Hurricanes, two by Sergeant Major Magnaghi, one by Captain Gostini and one by Sergeant Omiccioli of the 98th Squadron.
On 27th of October 1940, Carlo Poggio Suasa of the 81st Squadron, 6th Group, assigned to the 1st Terrestrial Fighter Wing stationed at Catania-Fontanarossa airport, shot down a Hawker Hurricane over Malta.
On July 11th, 1941, during an attack on the Maltese airbase of Micabba, three Italian Aces, belonging to the 10th Group of the 4th Wing were engaged by seven or eight enemy Hurricanes. They were Leonardo Ferrulli (with 21 kills between the war), Carlo Romagnoli (11 kills and 6 probable) and Franco Lucchini (22 kills). After a grueling dog fight, the three MC 200s managed to disengage and were pursued for 40 km before the British gave up the chase and, with their aircraft damaged but still able to fly, they were able to return to Sicily safely.
On June 27th, 1941, the same units of the 10th Group, 4th Wing, commanded by Ace Carlo Romagnoli, took off from Catania-Fontanarossa airport in Sicily to escort a Savoia-Marchetti S.M. 79 on a reconnaissance mission.
Arriving at Malta, they were immediately intercepted by a group of Hawker Hurricane Mark I of RAF No. 46 Squadron that forced them to abort the mission and return to Sicily.
On September 4th, Romagnoli led a reconnaissance mission over Malta with a formation of 17 M.C. 200 ‘Saetta’. Their goal was to confirm the sinking of a merchant ship that had been hit that night by a Junkers Ju.87B Picchiatello of the 101st Autonomous Dive Bombardment Group piloted by Sergeant Major Valentino Zagnoli, in the vicinity of Kalafrana.
Once in Valletta, the Macchi carried out a reconnaissance of the port at 6,000 meters and, having found nothing, returned to Sicily. At this point, 21 Hawker Hurricane Mark II fighters of No.126 and No.185 Squadrons were waiting for them (thanks to Maltese radars) at about 7,500 meters. After the furious battle that followed, Second Lieutenant Andrea Della Pasqua of the 91st Squadron was missing after being seen bailing out with a parachute. He was never found.
The 76th Squadron of the 7th Group of the 5th Terrestrial Fighter Wing took part in the Battle of Pantelleria between 12th and 15th June 1942. There, the Axis forces, with 92 aircraft of the Regia Aeronautica and 48 of the Luftwaffe, destroyed two, and damaged four merchant ships at the cost of 29 lost aircraft and 12 dead pilots.
Due to the three-engined reconnaissance aircraft flying over Malta being easy targets, some mechanics modified about ten Macchi MC 200 with an Avia RB 20/75/30 camera positioned behind the pilot’s seat. This strategy decreased the fighter’s maximum speed, but made the reconnaissance aircraft unrecognizable to the enemy, as well as being far more agile and faster than the three-engined aircraft they replaced.
Greece
For air combat during the Greek Campaign, which started on October 28th, 1940, the 54th Wing was employed. Its 372nd Squadron had 12 Macchi MC 200, based at the Brindisi-Casale Airport in southern Italy.
Between November and December, the 373rd Squadron, with 11 MC 200s, also arrived at the Bari-Palese Airport, the 374th Squadron with 12 MC 200s at the Taranto-Grottaglie Airport and the 370th, with 8 MC 200, at Foggia Airport, all in Southern Italy.
These squadrons mainly carried out escort missions for Italian FIAT B.R. 20 and Savoia-Marchetti S.M. 79 bombers used against Greek strategic targets.
Sergeant Luigi Gorrini of the 85th Squadron of the 18th Fighter Group of the 3rd Ground Fighter Wing, an Italian ace with 19 confirmed and 9 presumed kills, took training courses to learn how to fly the Macchi M.C. 200 and FIAT G. 50 held at Caselle Torinese and Torino Mirafiori airports between August 29th and December 10th, 1940. After this, he and his squadron were transferred to Araxos airport in Greece, where he flew escort flights for naval convoys and aircraft from Italy to Greece and vice versa.
On December 17th, 1940 during a patrol over the island of Cephalonia, Gorrini spotted two Bristol Blenheims, hitting one of them (which he considered probably shot down) and damaging the second.
In March 1941, the 22nd Autonomous Land Fighter Group was sent to Greece. Its 371st Squadron went to Vlora, while the rest of the group, with 36 Macchi MC 200s and an unknown number of FIAT CR42s, moved to the airport of Tirana, both cities of occupied Albania. During their first fights, they went up against the Hawker Hurricanes and Gloster Gladiators of the RAF.
Thanks to reinforcements that arrived in Albania in April, the 18th Group was sent back to Italy to train on the Macchi MC 200CB. The training lasted until mid-July, by which time the Greek Campaign was over. The Group was subsequently transferred to North Africa.
During the Greek campaign, which lasted until April 1941, Royal Italian Air Force fighters claimed to have shot down 77 Hellenic Air Force (HAF) aircraft (plus another 24 presumed), of which 52 were shot down and 25 destroyed on the ground, at a loss of 64 Italian aircraft. During engagements against the RAF, the British claimed to have destroyed 93 Italian aircraft (and another 26 probable) for just 10 aircraft lost. However, at the end of the campaign, the British losses amounted to 150 pilots (dead or prisoners) and 209 aircraft lost, 72 shot down by Italian fighters, 55 destroyed on the ground and 82 destroyed or abandoned during the evacuation.
Yugoslavia
At the outbreak of hostilities against Yugoslavia, the only air units assigned to the sector were the 4th Wing, equipped with 96 Macchi MC 200, the 7th Group in Treviso, and the 16th Group in Ravenna, which had 22 each, the 9th Group in Gorizia and the 10th Group in Altura di Pola, which had 23 each, and, finally, 6 that were in service with the 256th Squadron in Bari.
At dawn on April 6th, 1941, before the Declaration of War, four M.C.200s of the 73rd Squadron took off without an exact mission, flew over the port of Pula and then arrived at the island of Cres, attacking a tanker and setting it on fire.
There were no noteworthy actions for the rest of the brief Yugoslavian campaign. The Macchi of the 4th Wing flew against Yugoslavia for the last time on April 14th, when 20 Saetta of the 10th Group patrolled the airspace 100 km south of Karlovac, but without encountering enemy aircraft.
In March 1941, in order to counter the new British Hawker Hurricanes, the Regia Aeronautica was forced to withdraw the FIAT CR 42 of the 150th Group from Albania, replacing them with 36 Macchi MC 200s of the 22nd Group based at Tirana airport and the 371st Squadron, which moved from the Rome-Ciampino Airport to Valona.
Despite its lower top speed compared to the Hurricane, in the hands of experienced Italian pilots who were well trained in aerobatic flight, the Macchi MC 200 proved to be a tough adversary for the British pilots.
Ground operations on the Yugoslav front ended on April 17th. According to the official report of the 4th Wing, in eleven days there were no losses, 4 enemy aircraft were shot down and 45 Yugoslav aircraft were destroyed on the ground, damaging another ten.
Other victories were achieved by destroying an oil tanker, a tanker truck and an unspecified number of mechanized vehicles, as well as destroying airport facilities.
Another 5 Yugoslav aircraft, Dornier Do 17Ks, were destroyed on the ground at a Greek airport where they had taken refuge during an Italian attack.
North Africa
The North African desert was the most important theater of operations for the Italian pilots and their Macchi M.C. 200 ‘Saetta’.
At the end of the operations in Yugoslavia, the 153rd Group returned to Italy. It was based at Grottaglie airport, in southern Italy, with the task of defending the Port of Taranto against RAF attacks.
One of its squadrons, however, was ordered to go to North Africa to support Rommel’s offensive in Cyrenaica.
The first eleven M.C.200s of the 374th Squadron, under Captain Andrea Favini (later to become Wing Chief), arrived on April 19th, 1941 at Castel Benito airfield, 35 km south of Tripoli. Until the end of June 9th, the Macchi aircraft remained under Favini’s command. During the period of activity, the squadron never reached more than 7 operable Macchi at the same time.
An interesting fact is that Captain Andrea Favini was still using a pre-production Macchi MC 200 with a FIAT-Hamilton 34D-1 spinner and propellers. This is very strange, as all the pre-production aircraft and the very first production series should have been modified by that point.
Given the continuation of operations, on July 2nd, 1941, Macchi M.C. 200 of the 372nd Squadron of the famous 153º Gruppo ‘Asso di Bastoni’ (Eng: 153rd Group ‘Ace of Wands’) arrived in North Africa. Later, the 373rd Squadron from Greece, together with the 157th Group, also arrived.
The 76th Squadron of the 7° Gruppo Autonomo Caccia Terrestre, commanded by Major Marcello Fossetta, also arrived with 22 Macchi M.C. 200. However, they lost almost all of their fighters during a British air attack on the Benina base 19 km east of Benghazi, where the unit was stationed.
The data of both Italian and British units report some skirmishes between Macchi and British aircraft.
On December 8th, 1941, a Macchi MC.200 of the 153rd Group clashed with Hawker Hurricanes of the British 974th Squadron. During a fight, a Macchi engaged a Hurricane. After a succession of very tight turns, the Macchi struck the Hawker’s cockpit, which then flipped over and plummeted in a dive, killing New Zealand RAF Flight Lieutenant Owen Vincent Tracey, who had 6 kills credited to his name.
The 153rd Group, in its July-December report, claimed to have flown 359 missions for a total of 4,686 flight hours by its pilots, and 19 enemy aircraft destroyed in flight, plus 12 probable, in addition to 35 aircraft destroyed on the ground.
In December 1941, the Macchi M.C. 200 began to be accompanied by Macchi M.C. 202 of the 8th and 150th Groups based at El-Nofilia airport.
In the early months of 1942, the 8th, 13th and 150th Groups were mainly used on escort missions for FIAT CR 42s in the ground attack configuration.
On July 20th, 1942 the 18th Group of the 3rd Wing arrived in Tripoli with the 83rd, 85th and 95th squadrons, with a total of about 40 MC 200s, of which 21 in the M.C. 200CB configuration. These new arrivals, which were positioned at the Abu-Aggag airbase, 370 km from Cairo, meaning that the Macchi 200 was still the most numerous Italian fighter in North Africa, with 76 units (of which about three quarters were operational), 37 of which were in the 2nd Wing.
The Macchi M.C. 200CB of the 18th Group carried out dozens of ground attack missions. One of the most famous was stopping the British attempt to recapture Tobruk by sea in July 1942, sinking the destroyer Zulu and seriously damaging two troop carrier ships.
On April 18th 1942, between 1725 hrs and 1830 hrs, five Macchi M.C. 200CBs attacked a column of tanks of the 1st Armored Division of the British 8th Army at Sidi Bou Ali, in the governorate of Susa, in Tunisia. 22 M.C. 202s of the 54th Wing escorting the ‘Saetta’ clashed with a formation of P-40s and Spitfires that had arrived to support the armored units. Captain Sergio Maurer, Lieutenant Giuseppe Robetto and Sergeant Mauri each shot down a Spitfire, while Sergeant Rodoz brought down a P-40.
Despite the Regia Aeronautica’s gradual transition to the Macchi MC 202, the ‘Saetta’ remained the most widely used fighter aircraft. It was widely used as a secondary fighter by pilots when their MC 202s were undergoing repairs.
The 364th Squadron of the 150th Fighter Group, 52nd Wing, equipped with the Macchi M.C. 200 ‘Saetta’, operating from the airports of El Agheila, Benghazi and Martuba, participated intensively in intercept operations, surveillance flights, strafing ground targets, and escorting bombers.
The Macchi MC 200s were also able to successfully deal with Allied four-engined aircraft, despite their armament. On 14th August, Lieutenant Vallauri of the 2nd Wing intercepted four Consolidated B-24 Liberators during a reconnaissance mission in the skies above Tobruk. Instead of waiting for support from other fighters, he attacked them alone, managing to shoot down one of them.
A few days later, on 23rd August 1942, three M.C.200s intercepted and attacked a group of B-24 Liberators en route to Tobruk. Sergeant Zanarini and Second Lieutenant Zuccarini shot down one Liberator while the third pilot damaged another. The entirety of the 2nd Wing was 198 aircraft in August 1942 (including Macchi M.C. 200 and M.C. 202,) which flew an unspecified number of missions that lasted a total of 394 hours of missions over Tobruk and 1,482 hours escorting 77 Axis convoys from Southern Italy to the North African coast.
The Allied air superiority was becoming more and more overwhelming. Unfortunately, precise data for the actions of the following months is not available. In October, ten Macchi 200 were lost by the 2nd Wing.
At the beginning of November 1942, there were only 15 ‘Saetta’ on the front line in the 2nd and 3rd Wings (there is no data on the losses of the 54th Wing during the period). This was a very limited number. In July, there had been 76, meaning an average loss rate of about 12 aircraft per month.
The M.C. 200s were now outclassed in speed and armament by the latest versions of the Hawker Hurricane, Curtiss P-40s, and the more powerful Supermarine Spitfires. Despite this, the Macchi still managed to score a few victories.
In November, Lieutenant Savoia and Sergeant Major Baldi shot down two Bristol Beaufighters, while Sergeant Turchetti managed to shoot down two aircraft.
During the same month, some replacements arrived but they were not enough. On the 1st of December, the 2nd Wing had only 42 ‘Saetta’, of which 19 were in flying condition, while the others were under repair.
After the Battle of El Alamein, the Macchi were used to cover the retreat of the Italian-German troops. However, the lack of spare parts, fuel and the overwhelming technological and numerical Allied superiority meant that many aircraft were lost.
In October 1942, the 18th Group received the Macchi MC 202 of the 4th Wing, which, after months of actions, had been repatriated for reorganization.
On 11 January 1943, units of the 3rd Wing were used in the attack against some British airbases in the Wadi Tamet area.
The Macchi MC 202 escorted the Macchi MC 200CB fighter-bombers in bombing operations. Luigi Gorrini managed to shoot down the Spitfire Mark V of Flying Officer Neville Duke of the 92nd Squadron, as reported by the British pilot himself in one of his books.
In January 1943, all non-operational units were repatriated, with very few Macchi MC 200s remaining in North Africa as part of the 384th Squadron in Tunis and the 13th and 18th Groups in El Hamma.
The last group to be equipped with MC 200s was the 18th Group of Major Mario Becich, which fought with the ‘Saetta’ until the end of the campaign. The last major air battle of the Macchi MC 200 in North Africa was on 29th March 1943. Then, in the Gabès sector, 15 M.C.200s of various units intercepted an unknown number of P-40s and Spitfires, shooting down 4 enemy aircraft at the cost of one damaged aircraft forced to land on the way back.
Soviet Union
A contingent of Macchi M.C. 200s was sent to the front in the Soviet Union, despite the fact that they had an open cockpit.
The Comando Aviazione del Corpo di spedizione italiano in Russia (Aviation Command of the Italian Expeditionary Corps in Russia) was officially constituted on July 29th, 1941 at the Tudora airport. Major Giovanni Borzoni Group landed at this airport on 12th August with the 359th Squadron of Captain Vittorio Minguzzi, which had 11 other pilots, including Captain Carlo Miani and Lieutenant Giovanni Bonet. The 362nd Squadron of Captain Germano La Ferla also arrived with 11 other pilots. The 369th Squadron, commanded by Captain Giorgio Jannicelli, which had 13 pilots, and, finally, the 371st Squadron of Captain Enrico Meille, which had 11 pilots, completed the setup, all belonging to the 22nd Autonomous Land Fighter Group.
On August 16th, the 61st Aerial Observation Group arrived with 32 Caproni Ca.311 (34th, 119th, and 128th Squadrons) and a Savoia-Marchetti S.M.82 for support.
The 22nd Autonomous Land Fighter Group had a total of 51 MC 200s, two Savoia Marchetti S.M. 81 and three Caproni Ca. 133s. It was sent to the Eastern front from the Tirana Airport ( where they were located after March 1941). For its first missions, starting from August 27th, 1941, it was stationed at the Krivoi Rog airport.
On the same day, some aircraft of the 22nd Autonomous Group and some others of the 6th Group assigned to the 1st Ground Fighter Wing arrived in the Soviet Union. In total, eight Soviet aircraft, two Poliakov I-16s and six Tupolev SB-2s. were shot down.
Carlo Poggio Suasa, of the 81st Squadron of the 6th Group, shot down two Poliakov I-16s in a single day.
Due to the lightning advance of Axis troops in the Soviet Union, at the end of August, the unit had to move to the Kryvyi Rih airport and to Zaporižžja by the end of September. On 9th November, the 371st Squadron moved to the Donetsk sector, breaking away from the rest of the group.
Between August and the beginning of December, the 22nd Autonomous Fighter Group shot down another 8 Soviet fighters and bombers, apparently without suffering any losses. 4 more Soviets were downed in December.
During the Soviet Christmas ground offensive against Italian troops at Novo Orlovka, Italian pilots attacked Soviet troops in the Burlova sector. During these actions, they also shot down five Soviet fighters without any losses.
During one of these missions on December 28th, the ‘Saetta’ of the 359th Squadron shot down nine Soviet aircraft in the Timofeyevka and Polskaya areas, including six Polikarpov I-16 fighters and three bombers, without suffering losses.
On December 29th, 1941 the 369th Squadron lost its commander, Captain Giorgio Jannicelli. During a solo reconnaissance mission, he was intercepted by more than ten I-16 and Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-3 fighters and, after a grueling air battle, he was shot down. For his bravery, he was awarded the posthumous Gold Medal.
The Italian Macchis in the Soviet Union were unable to carry out any missions throughout January, and the first few days of February 1942 due to bad weather. On February 4th and 5th, the Regia Aeronautica launched an operation to destroy Soviet air bases. The first was at Kranyi Liman, where the MC 200 destroyed 21 Soviet aircraft on the ground and another 5 fighters were shot down during dogfights over the airport.
Between March and April, the airports of Luskotova and Leninsklij Bomdardir were also attacked.
By the end of March 1942, the 22nd Gruppo Autonomo Caccia Terrestre had scored a further 21 aerial victories against the Soviet Air Force.
On May 4th, 1942, the 22nd Autonomous Land Fighter Group, which still had a few operational aircraft, was replaced by the 21st Autonomous Land Fighter Group, consisting of the 356th, 382nd, 361st and 386th Squadrons. The 21st Group, commanded by Major Ettore Foschini, brought with it 12 new Macchi M.C. 202 fighters and 18 new Macchi M.C. 200s, probably the fighter-bomber version.
During the second battle of Kharkov, fought between May 12th to 30th 1942, Italian pilots carried out escort missions for German scouts and bombers. They earned the admiration of the commander of the German 17th Army, in particular for their daring and effective attacks in the Slavyansk area on Soviet fighters trying to shoot down German bombers.
In the summer of 1942, following the German advance, the 21st Group moved first to the Makeyevka airfield, and, later, to those of Tazinskaya, Voroshilovgrad and Oblivskaya.
The group shoots down 5 enemy aircraft in May, 5 in June and 11 in July.
Increasingly, Italian pilots were asked to escort German planes, but the Macchi aircraft wore out very quickly because of the lack of spare parts. On July 25th and 26th, five M.C.200s were shot down during aerial combat with the Soviets.
In the summer, 17 Macchi 202 ‘Folgore’ arrived from Italy to reinforce the line-up of ‘Saette’, by then worn out by incessant use. At the beginning of December, the Macchi MC 200s still on the line numbered 32 plus 11 Macchi MC 202s. The losses suffered became more and more consistent due to the technological advancement of the Soviet aircraft.
On 6th August 1942, some MC 200CBs carried out a bombing mission east of the Don, hitting Soviet artillery and infantry with their 50 kg bombs.
In December, only 32 Macchi M.C. 200s and 11 Macchi M.C. 202s were available. The Soviet Air Force, which was starting to become better combat trained, as well as the increasing prevalence of anti-aircraft fire also caused additional losses. In fact, over half of the missions that the Macchi were requested to carry out were ground attacks against Soviet tanks and infantry.
The last Italian action that employed a large number of aircraft was on 17th January 1943, when 25 Macchi MC 200 and MC 202 machine-gunned troops on the ground in the Millerovo sector.
On January 18th, 1943, commander Ettore Foschini received the order to withdraw, first to the airport of Stalino in Donetsk, and from there to Zaporižžja. On February 20th, 1943, the Group was at Odessa airbase, waiting to return to Italy. On 15th April, the Group left Odessa and, after four stops, arrived at the Florentine airport of Peretola at the end of the month.
Thirty Macchi M.C. 200s and nine M.C. 202s returned to Italy, while 15 damaged aircraft were dismantled and used for spare parts, abandoning them at airfields during the retreat.
A total of 66 Italian fighter planes had been lost on the Eastern Front for various reasons, but they managed to shoot down 88 enemy aircraft during 17 months of operation in the theater of war.
In a postwar document written in Italy, it is stated that, in 17 months, the fighters of the Regia Aeronautica on the Eastern Front carried out 3,759 actions against the Soviets, 511 in support of the infantry by dropping bombs, 1,310 machine-gun attacks on ground targets, 1,938 escorts to bombers or scouts. 88 enemy planes were destroyed at the expense of the loss of 15 Macchi M.C. 200 lost in combat. The best Italian unit in the Soviet Union was Captain Germano La Ferla’s 362nd Squadron, which destroyed 13 Soviet aircraft on the ground and shot down 30 fighters and bombers in air engagements.
Luftwaffe
After the armistice of September 8th, 1943, the German Army managed to recover a small number of Macchi M.C. 200s from Italian airports and put them in service with the Luftwaffe, mostly as training aircraft.
As far as known, these never took part in actions against Allied targets.
Aeronautica Nazionale Repubblicana
After the Armistice of 1943, of the 33 Macchi MC 200s operational at the time, 10 remained in the German-occupied territories. Not much is known about these 10 units, but it can be assumed that almost all of them were confiscated by the Luftwaffe.
Several Macchi M.C. 200s remained in service with the Aeronautica Nazionale Repubblicana (Eng: National Republican Air Force) for training purposes. Some of these vehicles had probably been recovered from depots or hangars and returned to service after an overhaul period.
Aeronautica Cobelligerante Italiana
As many as 23 Macchi MC 200s managed to reach the south of Italy after the Armistice of September 8th, 1943. Almost all of these belonged to the 8th Group, which had escorted the Regia Marina fleet (Eng: Italian Royal Navy) from La Spezia to Malta. In the summer of 1944, the 23 Macchi were assigned to the Fighter School of Leverano, where they were used for training until they could no longer be maintained.
Aeronautica Militare
Unfortunately, not much is known about the Macchi M.C. 200 in service with the Aeronautica Militare (Italian Air Force) after the war. A number of these, probably the surviving aircraft from the 23 Saettas used by the Aeronautica Cobelligerante Italiana, were kept in service using spare parts found all over the Italian peninsula, some with new parts that were produced after the war. They were used until 1947.
Being obsolete by the war’s end, the Macchi MC 200s were used in the 2ª Squadriglia of the Scuola Caccia (Fighter School) of Lecce for the training of a new generation of Italian fighter pilots.
Others
The MM337 prototype was presented at the Yugoslavian Belgrade Air Show in June 1938 and immediately attracted worldwide interest.
Spain, Finland, Sweden and Romania asked to evaluate the aircraft but, due to political problems and the Italian government’s ban on exports, these negotiations did not move forward.
Only the request of the Royal Danish Navy for 12 Macchi M.C. 200 to replace their old Hawker Nimrods was accepted. However, when Germany invaded Denmark in 1940, the delivery was canceled and the aircraft remained in Italy.
Switzerland also requested 36 examples. Italy responded by offering the first batch of 24 and the second one of 12. All examples would have been without radios and would have cost 58,000 USD (equivalent to about 1.1 million USD today) each without ammunition. Due to the imminent entry into the war, the General Staff of the Royal Army blocked the negotiations before Switzerland allocated the funds.
The USAAF 86th Fighter Squadron of the 79th Fighter Group of the 9th Air Force Division came into possession of a Macchi MC 200 at Grottaglie. This one had belonged to the 357th Squadron, from where it was later transferred to Gerbini in Sicily. It was piloted by Captain Jack H. Kauffman, who used it to train his fellow soldiers to fight against Italian aircraft.
British Evaluation on the Macchi M.C. 200
Former Squadron Leader D. H. Clarke wrote in 1955 in one of his books that, in Sorman, North Africa, he came into possession of a Macchi M.C. 200, serial no. MM 5285. After three days of overhaul, the British officer boarded the Macchi and took it to their base at El Assa.
Clarke stated that the Macchi had excellent visibility, a spacious cockpit with an open cabin (which he regarded very positively), was rustic but simple and had comfortable controls. The engine was quiet and easy to maintain and the vehicle was very maneuverable.
During simulated combat against a Hawker Hurricane II, a Curtiss P-40 and a Spitfire V, it could outturn all three. The downsides that Clarke pointed out were the poor armament (although he considered the ammunition reserve adequate) and the flipping problem.
The RAF captured more aircraft during the war. Another one was captured in North Africa and was shipped to the USA, while other aircraft were captured intact in Sicily and used for training British pilots, to familiarize them with enemy aircraft.
Camouflages and Coat of Arms
Being one of the most long-lived and most produced aircraft of the Regia Aeronautica during the Second World War, it is easy to understand that the Macchi M.C. 200 had many camouflage schemes during its operational life on the various fronts on which it operated.
The prototypes, at the time of their test flights and their presentation to the Army Staff in Guidonia, had no camouflage or paint applied, with the natural aluminum being exposed. On the rudder, there was the Italian Tricolour with the Savoia symbol in the middle. This was the flag of the Kingdom of Italy until 1947. On the side of the cockpit, there was the Fascio Littorio painted inside a round frame with a blue background.
The Fascio Littorio was the symbol of the Partito Fascista Italiano (Eng: Italian Fascist Party) which, after Benito Mussolini’s rise to power, became the symbol of the dictatorship, like the swastika for Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Party.
On both sides of the wings, there were also the “Fasci Littori Alari” (Eng: Wing Fasci Littori), circular rosettes 96 cm in diameter with a black outline and white background inside which were painted 3 stylized Fasci Littori. As the war progressed, the Fasci Littori Alari were slightly modified. The ones on the underside were painted white, with a black background.
The first examples produced by Macchi and then used in Italy and those used in the Soviet Union were painted in dark green (Verde Mimetico 2; Eng: Green Camouflage 2) with dark brown spots (Bruno Mimetico; Eng: Brown Camouflage) with yellow outlines (Giallo Mimetico 4; Eng: Yellow Camouflage 4).
Some variations existed.. For example, the brown spots could be covered by small yellow mottling or, as in the case of the 79th Squadron of the 6th Group of the 1st Wing, the dark green background was covered with yellow spots and brown spots.
Starting from June 1940, the planes of the Regia Aeronautica received a new feature. In order to avoid incidents of friendly fire, the Italian Tricolor, which could be confused with the tricolor of French planes, was replaced by the Croce di Savoia (the Italian Savoia royal family symbol), a white cross by ministerial order.
However, the dispatch did not specify the exact dimensions of the cross and the units painted different types before a standard model of the Croce di Savoia was chosen.
Also, the Macchi, Breda and, later, SIA Ambrosini production plants painted the crosses differently. Macchi painted a cross with longer vertical arms, while Breda painted a Greek cross (all arms of equal length) and SIA Ambrosini painted the cross on the whole height of the rudder.
The white band on the fuselage was introduced at the beginning of 1941 with the same purpose.
Between the spring and summer of 1941, a rule issued by the Ministry of War ordered that all Regia Aeronautica fighters be painted with a yellow nose to avoid incidents of friendly fire.
The order lasted only a few months, but many pictures show Italian aircraft with a characteristic yellow nose.
Also, in this case, the dispatch was misunderstood and some units (especially in the Soviet Union) painted the fuselage line and the wingtips in yellow.
The two planes of the 70th Squadron of the 23rd Autonomous Group were repainted by the unit completely in pitch black. They also covered all the markings.
SIA Ambrosini painted its M.C. 200 in dark green (Verde Oliva 2; Eng: Olive Green 2) and only in rare cases did the units repaint them. In North Africa, there were many camouflages, all on a khaki base (Nocciola Chiaro 4; Eng: Light Hazelnut 4 or Giallo Mimetico 4; Eng: Yellow Camouflage 4) with dark green spots (Verde Mimetico 2; Eng: Camouflage Green 2).
After the fall of Fascism in Italy, on July 25th, 1943, pilots were ordered to obscure the Fascio Littorio, which were covered with the paint the units had available.
After the Armistice of 8th September, a number of Macchi MC 200s remained in the hands of Italian pilots who fought for the Aeronautica Cobelligerante Italiana. They were ordered to cover the tricolor coat of arms on the wings and on the fuselage, and to obscure all previous insignia, such as the white band on the fuselage, the coat of arms of the unit and the Croce di Savoia (although some were retained). The Aeronautica Cobelligerante Italiana used Macchi MC 200 with both dark green monochrome camouflage and that used in North Africa, khaki with dark green irregular spots.
After the war, the few surviving examples were used in aluminum color with tricolor cockades on the fuselage and wings.
The specimens captured by the British and the Americans had Allied coat of arms to cover the Italian ones. For example, the US specimen retained squadron identification numbers, but all other symbols were obscured or covered with US symbols.
The upper right wing and lower left wing beams were covered with paint while the upper left and lower right wing were covered with the United States Army Air Forces insignia.
The fuselage fascia was repainted yellow and received another USAAF insignia and the tail received a British tricolor.
Production
In total, 1,153 examples of Macchi M.C. 200 ‘Saetta’ were produced between May 1939 and October 1942 ,including the two prototypes and 12 different production series.
It is difficult to classify the production of MC 200 fighters based on “series” because the plane was produced by 3 different companies. Different “series” have to be defined per company.
With the slow rate of production, some updates were initiated by one company in one production series, and by another company in another production series. Some series had substantial differences, others only small changes to speed up production or to try to keep the aircraft up to date with the most modern Allied fighters.
The companies that produced them were Aeronautica Macchi, which produced 395 planes plus the two prototypes starting from May 1939 in the Varese plant, the Società Italiana Ernesto Breda per Costruzioni Meccaniche, which produced 556 planes, and the Società Aeronautica Italiana Ambrosini, which produced a total of 200 planes.
In late 1939, it was proposed thay FIAT should produce the Macchi M.C. 200 in their factories in Turin. Needless to say, FIAT refused, criticizing the Macchi as too complex to produce.
In 1939, 62 Macchi 200 were produced, 10 between May and July, 26 between August and October and another 26 between November and December. An interesting fact is that these aircraft were ‘produced’ but not ‘tested’ or ‘delivered’ to the Regia Aeronautica.
In fact, as in many other cases with the Italian war industry of that period, small components were missing that forced the aircraft to be kept in depots for weeks. There were also problems with a lack of test pilots or, even worse, a lack of air force pilots to deliver the new aircraft.
Variants
Macchi M.C. 200 prototype – With fully retractable landing gear and closed cabin, 2 planes were produced by Macchi. Their first flight was on 24th December 1937.
Macchi M.C. 200 Pre-series – Serial numbers MM. 4495 to MM. 4520. Like the prototypes, it had retractable landing gear and a closed cabin, solved the overturning problems, and had a FIAT-Hamilton 34D-1 propeller with a hub cap.
Macchi M.C. 200 – Serial numbers MM. 4520 to MM. 4641. After the 146th model, the rear wheel of the landing gear was fixed.
Macchi M.C. 200 – Serial numbers from MM. 4641 to MM. 4736. After the 241st model, the cabin was left open.
Macchi M.C. 200 A2 – Equipped with wings and retractable landing gear taken from the successor, Macchi M.C. 202. The wings, redesigned by Mario Castoldi, no longer needed to be ballasted and solved the problem of overturning.
Standardized in 1942 to speed up production at Breda and SIAI, which were producing the Macchi M.C. 202 simultaneously. It also simplified the logistic line of front-line units.
Macchi M.C. 200 B2 – This version received only the wing attachment of the M.C. 202, the rest of the wing was of the Macchi MC 200. Like the A2 version, it was produced to speed up production and simplify the logistic line.
Macchi M.C. 200 AS – AS stands for Africa Settentrionale (Eng: North Africa). It was equipped with a sand filter for the carburetor.
Macchi M.C. 200CB – CacciaBombardiere or CB (Eng: Fighter-Bomber). With two wing pilons for bombs up to 160 kg or 150-liter auxiliary tanks.
Proposal
Better armed Macchi M.C. 200 – Proposal by engineer Castoldi to equip the M.C. 200 with two 7.7 mm Breda-SAFAT machine guns in the wings.
The idea was not approved by the Regia Aeronautica.
Macchi M.C. 200 Bis
Designation of a prototype produced by Breda (MM. 8191) with a 14-cylinder Piaggio P. XIX engine delivering a maximum power of 1,175 hp. It was derived from the Gnome-Rhône 14K Mistral Major and used on the Reggiane Re. 2002. It was tested during April-May 1942 by test pilot Acerbi. Castoldi was very annoyed because he did not approve the project.
Macchi M.C. 201
Two prototypes were built, with serial numbers MM 437 and MM 438. Given the availability of other, more powerful engines, Castoldi and Macchi spent very few resources on this project.
It was planned to equip the aircraft with the 1,000 hp FIAT A.76 RC.40 14-cylinder radial engine and some aerodynamic improvements, such as a more streamlined fuselage and a pressurized cabin.
Since the engine was not yet available, the prototypes were equipped with the 840 hp FIAT A.74 RC.38. The first prototype was flown for the first time on August 25th, 1941, by test pilot Guido Carestiato. It reached a speed of 512 km/h, while the second prototype was flown in September of the same year.
The two homologated vehicles, MM 8616 and MM 8617, were flown to Guidonia by Marshal Gori and Sergeant Staube on June 28th, 1942. The aircraft was not pursued because the expected engine was not available until 1943, by which time Italy had already started producing German inline engines under license for more than a year.
Surviving Macchi M.C. 200
Given the large production numbers, there are still three MC 200s exhibited in museums.
A destroyed fuselage and radial engine are exhibited at the Museo dell’Aeronautica Gianni Caproni in Trento, North-East Italy. Serial number unknown.
An example is exhibited at the Museo Storico dell’Aeronautica Militare in Vigna di Valle near Rome. Original serial number MM.8307, serial number exhibited MM.7707.
The last surviving example is on display at the National Museum of the United States Air Force in Riverside, Ohio. This aircraft belonged to the 372ª Squadriglia of the Regia Aeronautica. In order to replace losses, the plane was transferred in November 1942 to the 165ª Squadriglia in North Africa.
Due to the Battle of El Alamein and the hasty retreat from the Benghazi airport, the plane was abandoned with the coat of arms of the 372nd Squadron and did not receive the 165th Squadron coat of arms. It was captured by British troops and was subsequently shipped to the United States, where it was displayed around the country to sell war bonds.
It was later sold to the New England Air Museum, where it remained on display until 1989, when it was purchased by a private owner who had it restored in Italy by a team from Aermacchi (the new name of the company) and then sold to the US museum. Fortunately, the aircraft is displayed with the original coat of arms of the 372nd Squadron of the Regia Aeronautica and MM. 8146 serial number.
Conclusion
The Macchi M.C. 200 was one of the most produced fighters in Italy during the Second World War. It proved to be a reliable fighter, easy to produce and fly, with adequate power and speed and served on all fronts where the Regia Aeronautica was employed.
As the war progressed, it became increasingly obsolete against newer, more powerful types, but still saw service until the end of the war and even after.